scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study with Point-of-Care Manufacturing of Dual Targeted, Tandem Anti-CD19, Anti-CD20 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Modified T (CAR-T) Cells for Relapsed, Refractory, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4193-4193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirav N Shah ◽  
Fenlu Zhu ◽  
Carolyn Taylor ◽  
Dina Schneider ◽  
Winfried Krueger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: CAR-T cell therapy directed against the CD19 antigen is a breakthrough treatment for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell NHL. Despite impressive outcomes, not all pts respond and many that respond still relapse. Affordability and accessibility are further considerations that limit current commercial models of CAR-T products. Commercial CAR-T manufacturing is complex, time consuming, and expensive with a supply chain starting at the treating center with apheresis of mononuclear cells, cryopreservation, and shipping to and from a centralized third-party manufacturing site. We addressed these limitations in a Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating a first-in-human bispecific tandem CAR-T cell directed against both CD19 and CD20 (CAR-20.19-T) antigens for pts with R/R B-cell NHL. Through dual targeting we hope to improve response rates and durability of response while limiting antigen escape. We eliminated third party shipping logistics utilizing the CliniMACS Prodigy, a compact tabletop device that allows for automated manufacturing of CAR-T cells within a GMP compliant environment within the hospital. Most materials and reagents used to produce the CAR-T cell product were single-sourced from the device manufacturer. Methods: Phase 1 (NCT03019055), single center, dose escalation + expansion study to demonstrate feasibility and safety of locally manufactured second generation 41BB + CD3z CAR-20.19-T cells via the CliniMACS Prodigy. Feasibility was measured by ability to generate a target CAR-20.19-T cell dose for a minimum of 75% of subjects. Safety was assessed by the presence of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) through 28 days post-infusion. Dose was escalated in a 3+3 fashion with a starting dose of 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg, a target DLT rate <33%, and a goal treatment dose of 2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg. Adults with R/R Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Follicular Lymphoma (FL), Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) were eligible. CAR-T production was set for a 14-day manufacturing process. Day 8 in-process testing was performed to ensure quality and suitability of CAR-T cells for a potential fresh infusion. On Day 10, pts eligible for a fresh CAR-T infusion initiated lymphodepletion (LDP) chemotherapy with fludarabine 30 mg/m2 x 3 days and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 x 1 day, and cells were administered after harvest on Day 14. Pts ineligible for fresh infusion received cryopreserved product and LDP was delayed accordingly. Results: 6 pts have been enrolled and treated with CAR-20.19-T cells: 3 pts at 2.5 x 10^5 cells/kg and 3 pts at 7.5 x 10^5 cells/kg. Median age was 53 years (48-62). Underlying disease was MCL in 3 pts, DLBCL in 2 pts, and CLL in 1 patient. Baseline data and prior treatments are listed in Table 1. CAR-T production was successful in all runs and all pts received their target dose. Three pts received fresh CAR-T cells and 3 pts received CAR-T cells after cryopreservation. To date there are no DLTs to report. No cases of Grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity (NTX) were observed. One patient had Grade 2 CRS and Grade 2 NTX requiring intervention. The other had self-limited Grade 1 CRS and Grade 1 NTX. Median time to development of CRS was Day +11 post-infusion. All pts had neutrophil recovery (ANC>0.5 K/µL) by Day 28. Response at Day 28 (Table 2) is as follows: 2/6 pts achieved a complete response (CR), 2/6 achieved a partial response (PR), and 2/6 had progressive disease (PD). One subject with a PR subsequently progressed at Day 90. The 3 pts who did progress all underwent a repeat biopsy, and all retained either CD19 or CD20 positivity. Pts are currently being enrolled at the target dose (2.5 x 10^6 cells/kg) and updated results will be provided at ASH. Conclusions: Dual targeted anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 CAR-T cells were successfully produced for all pts demonstrating the feasibility of a point-of-care manufacturing process via the CliniMACS Prodigy device. With no DLTs or Grade 3-4 CRS or NTX to report, and 2/6 heavily pre-treated pts remaining in CR at 3 and 9 months respectively our approach represents a feasible and promising alternative to existing CAR-T models and costs. Down-regulation of both target antigens was not identified in any patient following CAR-T infusion, and in-process studies suggest that a shorter manufacturing timeline is appropriate for future trials (10 days). Disclosures Shah: Juno Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Lentigen Technology: Research Funding; Oncosec: Equity Ownership; Miltenyi: Other: Travel funding, Research Funding; Geron: Equity Ownership; Exelexis: Equity Ownership. Zhu:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Research Funding. Schneider:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Krueger:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Worden:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Hamadani:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; MedImmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellerant: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Ostuka: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Johnson:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Dropulic:Lentigen, A Miltenyi Biotec company: Employment. Orentas:Lentigen Technology Inc., A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Other: Prior Employment. Hari:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Shah ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
David S Siegel ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Deepu Madduri ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Immunomodulatory chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) has shown promising results for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in several phase 1 clinical studies in patients with advanced disease. Persistence of CAR T cells post infusion may be one determinant of duration of response. bb21217 is a next-generation anti-BCMA CAR T cell therapy based on investigational therapy bb2121 (Friedman 2018, Hum Gene Ther 29:585). It uses the same scFv, 4-1BB costimulatory motif and CD3-zeta T cell activation domain as bb2121 with the addition of phosphoinositide 3 kinase inhibitor bb007 during ex vivo culture to enrich the drug product for T cells displaying a memory-like phenotype. Evidence suggests that CAR T cells with this phenotype may be more persistent and more potent than unselected CAR T cells. CRB-402 is a first-in-human clinical study of bb21217 in patients with RRMM designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and duration of effect of bb21217. Methods: CRB-402 (NCT03274219) is an ongoing, multi-center phase 1 dose escalation trial of bb21217 in approximately 50 patients with RRMM who have received ≥ 3 prior regimens, including a proteasome inhibitor and an immuno-modulatory agent, or are double-refractory. During dose escalation, enrollment is restricted to patients with ≥ 50% BCMA expression by IHC on malignant plasma cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are collected via leukapheresis and sent to a central facility for transduction, expansion and release testing prior to being returned to the site for infusion. Patients undergo lymphodepletion with fludarabine (30 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) daily for 3 days, then receive bb21217 as a single infusion. Planned dose levels are 150, 450, 800, and 1,200 x 106 CAR+ T cells. The primary outcome measure is incidence of adverse events (AEs), including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Additional outcome measures are quality and duration of clinical response assessed according to the IMWG Uniform Response Criteria for MM, evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD), progression-free and overall survival, and quantification of CAR+ cells in blood. Results: Asof June 15, 2018, 8 patients (median age 64 [min;max 54 to 70]) have received bb21217. All patients to date received a dose of 150 x 106 CAR+ T cells. Four had high tumor burden, defined as ≥ 50% bone marrow plasma cells pre-infusion. Patients had a median of 9 (min;max 4 to 17) prior lines of therapy and 7/8 had prior autologous stem cell transplant; 50% had high-risk cytogenetics. Four of 8 (50%) had previously received Bort/Len/Car/Pom/Dara. Median follow-up after bb21217 infusion was 16 weeks (2 to 27 weeks) and 7 patients were evaluable for initial (1-month) clinical response. As of data cut-off, 5 of 8 patients developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 1 Grade 1, 3 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3) and responded to supportive care or tocilizumab. This included 1 patient with high tumor burden who experienced DLTs consisting of grade 3 CRS and grade 4 encephalopathy with signs of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome on MRI. This patient received tocilizumab, corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, improved neurologically and achieved a sCR. Following this event, the dose escalation cohort was divided into two groups based on tumor burden and dosing continued at 150x106 CAR+ T cells. No deaths occurred. With 1 to 6 months since treatment, 6 of 7 patients had demonstrated clinical response per IMWG criteria: currently 1 sCR, 3 VGPR, 2 PR. MRD negative results at 10-5 nucleated cells were obtained by next-generation sequencing in 3 of 3 evaluable responders. Robust CAR+ T cell expansion during the first 30 days was observed in 7 of 7 evaluable patients. Two of 2 patients evaluable at 6 months had detectable CAR vector copies. Conclusions: Early efficacy results with bb21217 CAR T therapy in RRMM at a dose of 150 x 106 CAR+ T cells are encouraging, with 6 of 7 patients demonstrating clinical responses. The adverse events observed to date are consistent with known toxicities of CAR T therapies. CAR+ T cells were measurable at 6 months post treatment in both evaluable patients. Enrollment in the study is ongoing; longer follow-up and data in more patients will establish whether treatment with bb21217 results in sustained CAR+ T cell persistence and responses. Disclosures Shah: Kite: Consultancy; Indapta Therapeutics: Consultancy; University of California San Francisco: Employment; Nekktar: Consultancy; Teneobio: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy; Bluebird: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Nkarta: Consultancy. Siegel:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Medicom: Speakers Bureau. Kaufman:Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Turka:bluebird bio, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lam:bluebird bio, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Massaro:bluebird bio, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hege:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: multiple; Mersana: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SITC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arcus Biosicences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Petrocca:bluebird bio, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berdeja:Glenmark: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bluebird: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Raje:AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Honoraria; Medscape: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4192-4192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy S. Abramson ◽  
Lia Palomba ◽  
Leo I Gordon ◽  
Matthew Lunning ◽  
Jon Arnason ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Based on promising results seen in patients treated with CD19-directed CAR-T cells in relapsed or refractory (R/R) pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Gardner, ASCO 2016) and adult B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Turtle, ASCO 2016), we are conducting a multicenter phase 1 trial of JCAR017 in R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02631044). JCAR017 is a second-generation, CD19-directed CAR-T cell product of defined cellular composition consisting of a 1:1 ratio of CD8+:CD4+ CAR+ T cells. Methods: Patients with R/R DLBCL (de novo or transformed from indolent lymphoma), follicular lymphoma grade 3B, or MCL and adequate organ function are eligible. There was no minimum absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) requirement for apheresis and no test expansion required. Treatment includes lymphodepletion (fludarabine 30 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 daily for 3 days) and JCAR017 given 2-7 days post-lymphodepletion at a starting dose of 5 x 107 CAR+ T cells (DL1). Single-dose and two-dose schedules are being evaluated. Primary objectives include safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of JCAR017 measured by flow cytometry and quantitative PCR. Secondary objectives include complete and overall response (CR, OR) rates and duration of response (DOR). Response is assessed using the Lugano (2014) criteria. Results: As of August 1, 2016, 39 patients have been enrolled and 28 patients apheresed. Fourteen patients have been treated, all at DL1. Eight were male and 6 female. Thirteen patients had DLBCL and 1 had MCL. Median age was 61 years (range 37-79) and median number of prior therapies was 5 (range 2-9). Ten patients had undergone prior transplant (7 autologous; 3 allogeneic). Of the 14 patients, there were no cases of severe cytokine release syndrome (sCRS); 3 patients had low grade CRS (21%) (2 grade 1; 1 grade 2) and none required treatment with tocilizumab. Two of the 14 treated patients (14%) had neurotoxicity: 1 grade 4 encephalopathy and 1 grade 4 seizure. Both were in patients with DLBCL and were dose-limiting toxicities. Two deaths were seen in the DLBCL group and were due to disease progression. Twelve patients had at least 1 post-treatment response assessment; 11 patients with DLBCL and 1 with MCL. The patient with MCL had progressive disease at day 29 (D29). In the DLBCL group, response rates were: 82% (9/11) OR, 73% (8/11) CR, 9% (1/11) PR and 18% (2/11) PD at the time of post-treatment assessment on D29. All but one patient who achieved a CR were in remission at the time of this data cut. One DLBCL patient in CR had a parenchymal brain lesion in the right temporal lobe that also completely resolved. Of note, this patient had no CRS or neurotoxicity associated with JCAR017 treatment. The PK profile of JCAR017 in the peripheral blood and bone marrow show cellular expansion in all patients with persistence out to at least 3 months in patients with adequate follow up. Exploratory biomarker analyses will be presented at the meeting along with updated clinical data. Conclusions: Treatment with the defined cellular composition product JCAR017 following lymphodepletion with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide results in high CR rates in patients with heavily pretreated DLBCL, including the first report of a CR in a patient with secondary CNS lymphoma. Observed toxicities are manageable and compare favorably to other reported CAR T-cell products. Disclosures Abramson: Gilead: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Gordon:Northwestern University: Patents & Royalties: Patent for gold nanoparticles pending. Lunning:Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myer-Squibb: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy. Arnason:Gilead: Consultancy. Forero-Torres:Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Albertson:Juno Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sutherland:Juno therapeutics: Employment. Xie:Juno Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Juno therapeutics: Employment. Siddiqi:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kite pharma: Other: Funded travel, 1 day registration, and 1 night hotel stay for EHA2016 so I could present trial data there.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4465-4465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirav N. Shah ◽  
Fenlu Zhu ◽  
Dina Schneider ◽  
Winfried Krueger ◽  
Andrew Worden ◽  
...  

Introduction Chimeric Antigen Receptor modified T (CAR-T) cell therapies have revolutionized the relapsed, refractory B cell malignancy landscape. Due to the complex steps involved with cell production, some third-party companies require T cells to be cryopreserved prior to shipping, while most manufacturers deliver modified CAR-T cells to the treating center in a cryopreserved state. This is vastly different to the approach taken with traditional cell based therapies, specifically allogeneic transplant (allo-HCT), an immunological treatment that relies on a graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect to prevent disease relapse. Historically, "fresh" stem cells were felt to be superior to cryopreserved products due to concerns that cryopreservation may damage T cells and other mononuclear cells delaying engraftment and limiting GVT reactivity. As a result, in clinical practice most allo-HCT products are still given as fresh infusions without cryopreservation. In a Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating the safety of a bispecific anti-CD19, anti-CD20 CAR (LV20.19CAR), CAR-T cells were produced in a point-of-care fashion utilizing the CliniMACS Prodigy device. Local manufacturing allowed flexibility to administer either fresh LV20.19CAR-T cells without cryopreservation, or if indicated, thawed CAR-T cells post-cryopreservation. Methods Patients (pts) were treated on a Phase 1 dose escalation + expansion trial (NCT03019055) to demonstrate safety of 41BB/CD3z LV20.19CAR-modified T cells for adults with relapsed, refractory B cell NHL including DLBCL, MCL, FL, and CLL. The starting dose was 2.5x10^5 cells/kg with a target dose of 2.5x10^6 cells/kg. All pts received low dose fludarabine (30 mg/m2) x 3 days +cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) x 1 day for lymphodepletion. In the Phase 1 dose-escalation cohorts, pts received fractionated CAR-T cells over two days (30% on Day 0 and 70% on Day+1), while expansion cohort pts received CAR-T cells as a single infusion. The goal for all pts was to infuse fresh CAR-T cell prior to cryopreservation, however, CAR-T cell could be cryopreserved and infused at a later date for clinical / logistical reasons. Results A total of 20 pts received LV20.19CAR T cell therapy (Table 1). Fourteen pts received fresh CAR-T cells immediately post-harvest, 5 pts received post-thaw CAR-T cells, and 1 patient received a mixed fresh/cryopreserved product and was not included in this analysis. Reasons for cryopreserved administration was delay due to active infection (N=3), patient preference (N=1), and unexplained neutropenia (N=1). Among 19 evaluable pts, the CR rate (79% vs 40%), mean ferritin, mean CRP, and incidence of CRS and neurotoxicity were all higher in the fresh infusion group (Table 1), but not statistically significant. In terms of LV20.19 CAR-T product characteristics, mean cell viability at infusion was 93% for the fresh infusion group versus 63% for cryopreserved pts (p<0.01). Point-of-care administration allowed final cell doses to be adjusted for diminished viability among pts receiving cryopreserved product. Figure 1 demonstrates the in-vivo expansion and persistence of LV20.19CART cells among fresh versus post-thaw pts. The peak percentage of CAR-T cells within the CD3 compartment was higher in pts given fresh cell infusions (Figure 2), but was not statistically significant (p=0.08). Conclusions Cryopreservation is known to diminish cell viability and increase clinical costs associated with freezing and storage. To date, there is limited clinical data evaluating outcomes of pts receiving fresh CAR-T cells compared to thawed CAR-T cells post-cryopreservation. Although it is presumed that in-vivo CAR-T cell activity is comparable in both scenarios, among our pts, both cell viability and in-vivo expansion favored pts who received a fresh infusion. Unlike third-party CAR-T cell products where viability is unknown at the time of infusion, we adjusted the final dose to accommodate decreased cell viability. CR rates and incidence of CRS and NTX were higher among fresh infused pts suggesting greater in-vivo activity, although findings were not statistically significant, partially a result of the small sample size. While our findings are limited by small numbers in each cohort and variability in cell dose and diagnosis, these data suggest that cryopreservation of CAR-T cells may impact clinical responses and is a logistical step that needs further investigation. Disclosures Shah: Cell Vault: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Oncosec: Equity Ownership; Lentigen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Exelexis: Equity Ownership; Geron: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board; Incyte: Consultancy; Oncosec: Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Other: Advisory Board. Zhu:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Schneider:Lentigen Technology, A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Krueger:Lentigen Technology, A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Worden:Lentigen Technology, A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Hamadani:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dropulic:Lentigen Technology, A Miltenyi Biotec Company: Employment. Hari:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Johnson:Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2866-2866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassie Chou ◽  
Simon Fraessle ◽  
Rachel Steinmetz ◽  
Reed M. Hawkins ◽  
Tinh-Doan Phi ◽  
...  

Background CD19 CAR T immunotherapy has been successful in achieving durable remissions in some patients with relapsed/refractory B cell lymphomas, but disease progression and loss of CAR T cell persistence remains problematic. Interleukin 15 (IL-15) is known to support T cell proliferation and survival, and therefore may enhance CAR T cell efficacy, however, utilizing native IL-15 is challenging due to its short half-life and poor tolerability in the clinical setting. NKTR-255 is a polymer-conjugated IL-15 that retains binding affinity to IL15Rα and exhibits reduced clearance, providing sustained pharmacodynamic responses. We investigated the effects of NKTR-255 on human CD19 CAR T cells both in vitro and in an in vivo xenogeneic B cell lymphoma model and found improved survival of lymphoma bearing mice receiving NKTR-255 and CAR T cells compared to CAR T cells alone. Here, we extend upon these findings to further characterize CAR T cells in vivo and examine potential mechanisms underlying improved anti-tumor efficacy. Methods CD19 CAR T cells incorporating 4-1BB co-stimulation were generated from CD8 and CD4 T cells isolated from healthy donors. For in vitro studies, CAR T cells were incubated with NKTR-255 or native IL-15 with and without CD19 antigen. STAT5 phosphorylation, CAR T cell phenotype and CFSE dilution were assessed by flow cytometry and cytokine production by Luminex. For in vivo studies, NSG mice received 5x105 Raji lymphoma cells IV on day (D)-7 and a subtherapeutic dose (0.8x106) of CAR T cells (1:1 CD4:CD8) on D0. To determine optimal start date of NKTR-255, mice were treated weekly starting on D-1, 7, or 14 post CAR T cell infusion. Tumors were assessed by bioluminescence imaging. Tumor-free mice were re-challenged with Raji cells. For necropsy studies mice received NKTR-255 every 7 days following CAR T cell infusion and were euthanized at various timepoints post CAR T cell infusion. Results Treatment of CD8 and CD4 CAR T cells in vitro with NKTR-255 resulted in dose dependent STAT5 phosphorylation and antigen independent proliferation. Co-culture of CD8 CAR T cells with CD19 positive targets and NKTR-255 led to enhanced proliferation, expansion and TNFα and IFNγ production, particularly at lower effector to target ratios. Further studies showed that treatment of CD8 CAR T cells with NKTR-255 led to decreased expression of activated caspase 3 and increased expression of bcl-2. In Raji lymphoma bearing NSG mice, administration of NKTR-255 in combination with CAR T cells increased peak CAR T cell numbers, Ki-67 expression and persistence in the bone marrow compared to mice receiving CAR T cells alone. There was a higher percentage of EMRA like (CD45RA+CCR7-) CD4 and CD8 CAR T cells in NKTR-255 treated mice compared to mice treated with CAR T cells alone and persistent CAR T cells in mice treated with NKTR-255 were able to reject re-challenge of Raji tumor cells. Additionally, starting NKTR-255 on D7 post T cell infusion resulted in superior tumor control and survival compared to starting NKTR-255 on D-1 or D14. Conclusion Administration of NKTR-255 in combination with CD19 CAR T cells leads to improved anti-tumor efficacy making NKTR-255 an attractive candidate for enhancing CAR T cell therapy in the clinic. Disclosures Chou: Nektar Therapeutics: Other: Travel grant. Fraessle:Technical University of Munich: Patents & Royalties. Busch:Juno Therapeutics/Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Equity Ownership; Technical University of Munich: Patents & Royalties. Miyazaki:Nektar Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Marcondes:Nektar Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Riddell:Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Lyell Immunopharma: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Turtle:Allogene: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Humanigen: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member; Nektar Therapeutics: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; T-CURX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor with staff from Juno Therapeutics; pending, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Other: Ad hoc advisory board member.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4810-4810
Author(s):  
Mark B. Geyer ◽  
Briana Cadzin ◽  
Elizabeth Halton ◽  
Peter Kane ◽  
Brigitte Senechal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Autologous CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell therapy leads to complete responses (CR) in patients (pts) with (w/) relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, &gt;80% CR rate) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, ~40-55% CR rate). However, following fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) conditioning and CAR T-cell therapy w/ a CD28 costimulatory domain (e.g. 19-28z CAR T-cells), rates of grade ≥3 ICANS and grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in pts w/ R/R DLBCL and morphologic R/R B-ALL exceed 30%. CRS and ICANS are associated w/ considerable morbidity, including increased length of hospitalization, and may be fatal. Host monocytes appear to be the major reservoir of cytokines driving CRS and ICANS post-CAR T-cell therapy (Giavradis et al. and Norelli et al., Nature Medicine, 2018). Circulating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) may also blunt efficacy of 19-28z CAR T-cells in R/R DLBCL (Jain et al., Blood, 2021). The CD45-targeted antibody radioconjugate (ARC) 131-I apamistamab is being investigated at myeloablative doses as conditioning prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in pts w/ R/R acute myeloid leukemia. However, even at low doses (4-20 mCi), transient lymphocyte and blast reduction are observed. Preclinical studies in C57BL/6 mice demonstrate low-dose anti CD45 radioimmunotherapy (100 microCi) transiently depletes &gt;90% lymphocytes, including CD4/CD8 T-cells, B-cells, NK cells, and T-regs, as well as splenocytes and MDSCs, w/ negligible effect on bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic stem cells (Dawicki et al., Oncotarget, 2020). We hypothesized a higher, yet nonmyeloablative dose of 131-I apamistamab may achieve more sustained, but reversible depletion of lymphocytes and other CD45 + immune cells, including monocytes thought to drive CRS/ICANS. We additionally hypothesized this approach (vs Flu/Cy) prior to CAR T-cell therapy would promote CAR T-cell expansion while reducing CSF levels of monocyte-derived cytokines (e.g. IL-1, IL-6, and IL-10), thus lowering the risk of severe ICANS (Fig 1A). Study design and methods: We are conducting a single-institution pilot study of 131-I apamistamab in lieu of Flu/Cy prior to 19-28z CAR T-cells in adults w/ R/R BALL or DLBCL (NCT04512716; Iomab-ACT); accrual is ongoing. Pts are eligible for leukapheresis if they are ≥18 years-old w/ R/R DLBCL (de novo or transformed) following ≥2 chemoimmunotherapy regimens w/ ≥1 FDG-avid measurable lesion or B-ALL following ≥1 line of multi-agent chemotherapy (R/R following induction/consolidation; prior 2 nd/3 rd gen TKI required for pts w/ Ph+ ALL) w/ ≥5% BM involvement and/or FDG-avid extramedullary disease, ECOG performance status 0-2, and w/ appropriate organ function. Active or prior CNS disease is not exclusionary. Pts previously treated w/ CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy are eligible as long as CD19 expression is retained. See Fig 1B/C: Post-leukapheresis, 19-28z CAR T-cells are manufactured as previously described (Park et al., NEJM, 2018). Bridging therapy is permitted at investigator discretion. Thyroid blocking is started ≥48h pre-ARC. 131-I apamistamab 75 mCi is administered 5-7 days pre-CAR T-cell infusion to achieve total absorbed marrow dose ~200 cGy w/ remaining absorbed dose &lt;25 cGy at time of T-cell infusion. 19-28z CAR T-cells are administered as a single infusion (1x10 6/kg, B-ALL pts; 2x10 6/kg, DLBCL pts). The primary objective is to determine safety/tolerability of 131-I apamistamab 75 mCi given prior to 19-28z CAR T-cells in pts w/ R/R B-ALL/DLBCL. Secondary objectives include determining incidence/severity of ICANS and CRS, anti-tumor efficacy, and 19-28z CAR T-cell expansion/persistence. Key exploratory objectives include describing the cellular microenvironment following ARC and 19-28z CAR T-cell infusion using spectral cytometry, as well as cytokine levels in peripheral blood and CRS. The trial utilizes a 3+3 design in a single cohort. If dose-limiting toxicity (severe infusion-related reactions, treatment-resistant severe CRS/ICANS, persistent regimen-related cytopenias, among others defined in protocol) is seen in 0-1 of the first 3 pts treated, then up to 6 total (up to 3 additional) pts will be treated. We have designed this study to provide preliminary data to support further investigation of CD45-targeted ARCs prior to adoptive cellular therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Geyer: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Geoghegan: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Reddy: Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Berger: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Ludwig: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Pandit-Taskar: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Clarity Pharma: Research Funding; Illumina: Consultancy, Honoraria; ImaginAb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ymabs: Research Funding; Progenics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medimmune/Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding. Sauter: Genmab: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: 131-I apamistamab and 19-28z CAR T-cells are investigational agents in treatment of ALL and DLBCL


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 898-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liora M Schultz ◽  
Kara L. Davis ◽  
Christina Baggott ◽  
Christie Chaudry ◽  
Anne Cunniffe Marcy ◽  
...  

Abstract Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) therapy targeting CD19 achieves complete remission (CR) rates of 70%-90% in relapsed/refractory B-ALL. Relapse due to loss of the CD19 targeted epitope presents a therapeutic challenge as evidenced by the largest global pediatric CD19-CAR experience which showed 15 of 16 relapses to be explained by CD19 downregulation (Maude et al, NEJM 2018). Alternatively targeting CD22 using CD22-CAR therapy has demonstrated a CR rate of approximately 70% in both CD19+ and CD19- B-ALL, however relapse due to CD22 downregulation limits the curative potential of singularly-targeting CD22 (Fry et al, Nat Med. 2018). We hypothesized that simultaneous targeting of CD19 and CD22 via a bispecific CAR-T cell would be a safe and tolerable treatment strategy in relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL and address immune evasion. Here, we report the first clinical experience in pediatric patients using bispecific CD19-CD22 CAR T cells. We describe a single institution phase I dose escalation study in pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B cell ALL. We utilized lentiviral transduction of a bivalent CAR construct incorporating the fmc63 CD19 and m971 CD22 single chain variable fragments (scFvs) used in clinically tested CAR constructs and a 41BB costimulatory endodomain (Fry et al, Nat Med. 2018). Our primary objectives are feasibility of production of this bivalent CAR and safety at 3 dose escalation levels (1x106, 3x106 and 1x107 CAR T cells/kg). Clinical response assessment is evaluated as a secondary aim. All patients described received lymphodepletion with fludarabine (25mg/m2 x 3 days) and cyclophosphamide (900mg/m2 x 1) followed by fresh or cryopreserved CAR T cell infusion after a 7-9 day production time. Patients were prospectively monitored at predefined intervals for disease response and correlative assessments. Four pediatric patients with precursor-B ALL, age 2-17, have been enrolled and treated with CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR T cells at dose level 1 (1x106) [Table 1]. Three patients entered CAR therapy with low disease burden detected by minimal residual disease (MRD) alone and 1 patient initiated therapy with 12% bone marrow blasts. All patients were CNS1 at time of treatment. The toxicity profile mirrored that of the singular CD19 and CD22 CAR experience with 3 patients experiencing reversible CRS (2 Grade I, 1 Grade II), onset day 3-8, and 2 patients experiencing grade I neurotoxicity, onset day 3-9. In our cohort, we experienced lower grade toxicities than previously reported, likely due to a mean lower disease burden. Only 1 patient with CRS met criteria for tocilizumab and this patient was the singular study patient treated with higher burden disease. Neurotoxicity was managed with supportive care and fully reversible. Peripheral blood flow cytometry analysis detects circulating CAR by day 6 in all patients and demonstrates peak CAR expansion between day 6-10. Peak CAR T expansion reached levels of 10-25% of total T cells with inter-patient variability in CD4 and CD8 predominance, favoring CD8 expansion in 3 of 4 patients. Clinical symptoms and inflammatory markers expectedly correlate with peak CAR expansion. Four of 4 patients achieved complete remission (CR) at day 28 post-CD19/CD22 bispecific CAR therapy. Three of 4 patients demonstrated MRD- remissions by flow cytometry and of these, next generation sequencing (NGS) was negative where available (N=2). Multi-parametric CyTOF studies permitting CAR T cell phenotyping in conjunction with single cell TCR tracking, proteomics, epigenomics and cytokine profiling are ongoing and will be used to further characterize persisting CAR T cells and define inter-product and inter-patient variability. In this phase I study, we demonstrate safety and tolerability of this bispecific CD19/CD22 CAR at a dose of 1x106 CAR T cells/kg in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B cell ALL. The CD19/22-bispecific CAR mediated antileukemic activity in 100% of patients studied thus far. Long-term follow up and further accrual will be required to inform the effect of bispecific CAR targeting on surface antigen remodeling. Disclosures Muffly: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; Shire Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Miklos:Genentech: Research Funding; Kite - Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics - Abbot: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 742-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric L Smith ◽  
Sham Mailankody ◽  
Arnab Ghosh ◽  
Reed Masakayan ◽  
Mette Staehr ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) rarely obtain durable remissions with available therapies. Clinical use of BCMA targeted CAR T cell therapy was first reported in 12/2015 for RRMM, and based on small numbers, preliminary results appear promising. Given that host immune anti-murine CAR responses have limited the efficacy of repeat dosing (Turtle C. Sci Trans Med 2016), our goal was to develop a human BCMA targeted CAR T cell vector for clinical translation. We screened a human B cell derived scFv phage display library containing 6x1010 scFvs with BCMA expressing NIH 3T3 cells, and validated results on human MM cell lines. 57 unique and diverse BCMA specific scFvs were identified containing light and heavy chain CDR's each covering 6 subfamilies, with HCDR3 length ranges from 5-18 amino acids. 17 scFvs met stringent specificity criteria, and a diverse set was cloned into CAR vectors with either a CD28 or a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. Donor T cells transduced with BCMA targeted CAR vectors that conveyed particularly desirable properties over multiple in vitro assays, including: cytotoxicity on human MM cell lines at low E:T ratios (&gt;90% lysis, 1:1, 16h), robust proliferation after repeat antigen stimulation (up to 700 fold, stimulation q3-4d for 14d), and active cytokine profiling, were selected for in vivo studies using a marrow predominant human MM cell line model in NSG mice. A single IV injection of CAR T cells, either early (4d) or late (21d) after MM engraftment was evaluated. In both cases survival was increased when treated with BCMA targeted CAR T cells vs CD19 targeted CAR T cells (median OS at 60d NR vs 35d p&lt;0.05). Tumor and CAR T cells were imaged in vivo by taking advantage of luciferase constructs with different substrates. Results show rapid tumor clearance, peak (&gt;10,000 fold) CAR T expansion at day 6, followed by contraction of CAR T cells after MM clearance, confirming the efficacy of the anti-BCMA scFv/4-1BB containing construct. Co-culture with primary cells from a range of normal tissues did not activate CAR T cells as noted by a lack of IFN release. Co-culture of 293 cells expressing this scFv with those expressing a library of other TNFRSF or Ig receptor members demonstrated specific binding to BCMA. GLP toxicity studies in mice showed no unexpected adverse events. We generated a retroviral construct for clinical use including a truncated epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFRt) elimination gene: EGFRt/hBCMA-41BBz. Clinical investigation of this construct is underway in a dose escalation, single institution trial. Enrollment is completed on 2/4 planned dose levels (DL). On DL1 pts received cyclophosphamide conditioning (3g/m2 x1) and 72x106 mean CAR+ T cells. On DL2 pts received lower dose cyclophosphamide/fludarabine (300/30 mg/m2 x3) and 137x106 mean CAR+ T cells. All pts screened for BCMA expression by IHC were eligible. High risk cytogenetics were present in 4/6 pts. Median prior lines of therapy was 7; all pts had IMiD, PI, high dose melphalan, and CD38 directed therapies. With a data cut off of 7/20/17, 6 pts are evaluable for safety. There were no DLT's. At DL1, grade 1 CRS, not requiring intervention, occurred in 1/3 pts. At DL2, grade 1/2 CRS occurred in 2/3 pts; both received IL6R directed Tocilizumab (Toci) with near immediate resolution. In these 2 pts time to onset of fever was a mean 2d, Tmax was 39.4-41.1 C, peak CRP was 25-27mg/dl, peak IL6 level pre and post Toci were 558-632 and 3375-9071 pg/ml, respectively. Additional serum cytokines increased &gt;10 fold from baseline in both pts include: IFNg, GM CSF, Fractalkine, IL5, IL8, and IP10. Increases in ferritin were limited, and there were no cases of hypofibrinogenemia. There were no grade 3-5 CRS and no neurotoxicities or cerebral edema. No pts received steroids or Cetuximab. Median time to count recovery after neutropenia was 10d (range 6-15d). Objective responses by IMWG criteria after a single dose of CAR T cells were observed across both DLs. At DL1, of 3 pts, responses were 1 VGPR, 1 SD, and 1 pt treated with baseline Mspike 0.46, thus not evaluable by IMWG criteria, had &gt;50% reduction in Mspike, and normalization of K/L ratio. At DL2, 2/2 pts had objective responses with 1 PR and 1 VGPR (baseline 95% marrow involvement); 1 pt is too early to evaluate. As we are employing a human CAR, the study was designed to allow for an optional second dose in pts that do not reach CR. We have treated 2 pts with a second dose, and longer follow up data is pending. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Smith: Juno Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: BCMA targeted CAR T cells, Research Funding. Almo: Cue Biopharma: Other: Founder, head of SABequity holder; Institute for Protein Innovation: Consultancy; AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP: Consultancy. Wang: Eureka Therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xu: Eureka Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Park: Amgen: Consultancy. Curran: Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Dogan: Celgene: Consultancy; Peer Review Institute: Consultancy; Roche Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Liu: Eureka Therpeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Brentjens: Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1680-1680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre V. Hirayama ◽  
Jordan Gauthier ◽  
Kevin A. Hay ◽  
Alyssa Sheih ◽  
Sindhu Cherian ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Autologous T cells engineered to express a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) have shown high overall response rates (ORR) in otherwise treatment-refractory CD19+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); however, not all patients (pts) achieve complete remission (CR). PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and/or other tissues could impair the function of PD-1+ CAR-T cells and the efficacy of CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy. PD-1 pathway blockade may enhance the function and antitumor activity of CD19 CAR-T cells. Here we report preliminary data from a phase 1 dose-finding study (NCT02706405) of the safety and feasibility of combination therapy with JCAR014 CD19-specific 4-1BB-costimulated CAR-T cells and escalating doses of durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, in adults with relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell NHL. Methods Pts are treated in one of two groups. All pts receive lymphodepletion chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by infusion of JCAR014. Pts in group 1 receive the first infusion of durvalumab (225 mg, 750 mg, or 1500 mg) 21-28 days after treatment with JCAR014. Pts in group 2 receive the first dose of durvalumab (7.5 mg, 22.5 mg, 75 mg, 225 mg, 750 mg, or 1500 mg) 1 day prior to JCAR014 infusion. Up to 10 doses of durvalumab are administered after JCAR014 at the highest identified safe dose at 4-week intervals until toxicity or disease progression. We evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the combination therapy and the pharmacokinetic profile of JCAR014 after infusion. Adverse events were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03, with the exception of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which was graded according to consensus criteria (Lee, Blood 2014). Positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed approximately 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months after JCAR014 infusion and the best anti-tumor response was reported according to the Lugano criteria (Cheson, JCO 2014). Results Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Fifteen pts have been treated, including 6 in group 1 who received post-JCAR014 durvalumab doses of 225 mg (n = 3) and 750 mg (n = 3), and 9 in group 2 who received pre-JCAR014 durvalumab doses of 7.5 mg (n = 1), 22.5 mg (n = 1), 75 mg (n = 3), or 225 mg (n = 4). Durvalumab dose escalation is ongoing. JCAR014 manufacturing was successful for all pts. All pts received 2 x 106 JCAR014 CAR-T cells/kg, except the first 2 pts treated on the study who received 7 x 105 CAR-T cells/kg. Of the 13 pts who received JCAR014 at 2 x 106 CAR-T cells/kg, 5 pts (38%) developed CRS (2 grade 1, 2 grade 2, and 1 grade 4) and one (8%) developed grade 1 neurotoxicity. CRS and/or neurotoxicity occurred within 4 weeks of JCAR014 infusion, and were not observed when durvalumab was administered after JCAR014. With the exception of B cell aplasia, no autoimmune adverse events were observed. Twelve of 13 pts who received 2 x 106 CAR-T cells/kg were evaluable for response. One patient, who had grade 4 CRS and biopsy evidence of extensive CAR-T cell infiltration into persistent sites of disease, elected to receive hospice care and died on day 32 after JCAR014 infusion without full response evaluation. The overall response rate was 50% (5 CR, 42%; 1 PR, 8%). Of the 5 pts who achieved CR, 3 were in CR at the first restaging after JCAR014 and 2 subsequently converted to CR after the first post-JCAR014 durvalumab infusion. Only one patient who achieved CR has relapsed (median follow-up 10.6 months, range 3.7-11.8). Continued stable disease or evidence of regression was seen in 4 of 6 (67%) initially non-responding pts who continued durvalumab therapy (median 5 doses, range 1-6). CAR-T cell counts expanded in the peripheral blood within 14 days of JCAR014 infusion in all pts. Higher peak and day 28 CAR-T cell copy numbers in blood by qPCR were observed in responding pts. CAR-T cells were detected for a median of 5.1 months (range, 1.7 to 9.1 months) in responding pts. In vivo re-accumulation of CAR-T cells after the first post-JCAR014 durvalumab dose was observed in the blood of two patients in group 2. Conclusion The combination of JCAR014 with durvalumab for the treatment of adult pts with aggressive B-cell NHL appears safe; however, dose escalation is ongoing. Complete responses were observed both at initial restaging after JCAR014 infusion, and also subsequently in pts continuing durvalumab therapy after initially failing to achieve CR. Disclosures Hirayama: DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Hay:DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Till:Mustang Bio: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kiem:Homology Medicine: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Shadman:Verastem: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Mustang Biopharma: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Cassaday:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Spouse Employment, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Acharya:Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria. Riddell:Cell Medica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; NOHLA: Consultancy. Maloney:Roche/Genentech: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Turtle:Precision Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eureka Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno Therapeutics / Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Caribou Biosciences: Consultancy; Aptevo: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2876-2876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhitao Ying ◽  
Pengpeng Xu ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Shu Cheng ◽  
Wen Wu ◽  
...  

Introduction JWCAR029 is a CD19-directed 4-1BB chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell product with a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, of which CD4 and CD8 CAR T cells are produced together and transfused in non-fixed ratio. We conducted a single arm, open-label, dose escalation Phase I trial of JWCAR029 in relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NCT03344367 and NCT03355859). Methods Eligible pts had confirmed B-cell NHL with R/R disease after ≥2 prior lines of therapy. All subjects received lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to receiving JWCAR029. After lymphodepleting chemotherapy, JWCAR029 was administrated as a single infusion in escalating dose levels, from 25×106 CAR T cells (dose level 1, DL1), 50×106 CAR T cells (dose level 2, DL2), 100×106 CAR T cells (dose level 3, DL3) to 150×106 CAR T cells (dose level 4, DL4) according to mTPI-2 algorithm. Circulating blood counts, serum biochemistry, coagulation status, and cytokines were followed up after infusion. Cytokines were assessed on a Luminex platform. Tumor evaluation was evaluated per the Lugano criteria by PET-CT (Cheson, 2014) and safety and disease status was followed at approximately 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months after receiving JWCAR029. PK was measured by flow cytometry and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction system. All the adverse events were recorded for 24 months after infusion. The study was approved by Beijing Cancer Hospital and Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital Review Board with informed consent obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results As of July 5, 2019, 44 patients were screened and 32 patients were enrolled and received treatment in two study sites in China. Twenty nine patients are evaluable and have been followed for at least 6 months: 20 diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 9 follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Median age was 52 years (range 29 to 68 years). The demographic characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. All patients received immunochemotherapy as induction and a median of four lines of salvage treatment (range 2 to 7). Eleven (34%) patients received bridging chemotherapy after T cell collection due to rapid tumor progression, followed by re-evaluation before CAR T cell infusion. Lymphodepletion consisted of fludarabine 25mg/m2/d and cyclophosphamide 250mg/m2/d on Day -4 to Day -2, followed by CAR T cell infusion on Day 0. Median time to peak CAR+ T cell expansion was 11 (8-15) days. No DLTs were reported. There were no treatment-related deaths. Seventeen patients (53.1%) reported cytokine release syndrome (CRS) with 16 grade 1 or 2 (50%) and 1 (3.1%) grade 3. No grade 4 or 5 CRS was observed. Main symptoms were fever (>39.0 degrees), fatigue, and muscle soreness. The rate of CRS was similar across dose level groups. Grade 1 and 2 neurotoxicity was observed in 5 patients (15.6%). No grade ≥3 neurotoxicity was reported. Most common adverse events (frequency >20%) included leukopenia (Gr 3-4: 21.9%, Gr 1-2: 43.8%), lymphopenia (Gr 1-2: 21.9%, Gr 3-4: 21.9%), neutropenia (Gr 1-2: 37.5%, Gr 3-4: 28.2%), thrombocytopenia (Gr 1-2: 21.9%, Gr 3-4: 3.1%), pyrexia (Gr 1-2: 21.9%) and immunoglobulins decreased (Gr 1: 28.1%). Among all 29 efficacy-evaluable patients (6 of DL1, 6 of DL2, 8 of DL3 and 9 of DL4), the best ORR was 89.7%; 85% for DLBCL patients. ORR/CRR of all evaluable patients at 1, 3 and 6 months were 86.2%/65.5%, 69%/62.1% and 58.6%/55.2%, respectively, and for the 20 DLBCL patients the ORR/CRR was 80%/60%, 55%/55%, and 45%/45%, respectively (Table 2). Conclusion Although longer follow-up is needed, the data from 29 evaluable patients in this Phase I trial have demonstrated high response rates and a favorable safety profile of JWCAR029 in relapsed and refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. A Ph II trial that further assess safety and efficacy of JWCAR029 in DLBCL and FL patients has been initiated and is open for enrollment. Disclosures Wang: JW therapeutics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hao:JW therapeutics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:JW therapeutics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lam:JW therapeutics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Li:JW therapeutics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zheng:JW therapeutics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 217-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L Maude ◽  
David M. Barrett ◽  
Susan R. Rheingold ◽  
Richard Aplenc ◽  
David T Teachey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Targeted immunotherapy with CTL019, CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells, can produce potent and sustained responses in children with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, a subset of patients has limited persistence, which can increase the risk of relapse. Most CAR single chain variable fragment (scFv) domains, including that of CTL019, are of murine origin; therefore, anti-mouse reactivity is one potential cause of immune-mediated rejection that may be overcome by fully human or humanized CAR designs. We developed a humanized anti-CD19 scFv domain and now report on treatment with humanized CD19-directed CAR T cells (CTL119). Design A pilot/phase 1 study of CAR-modified T cells containing a humanized anti-CD19 scFv domain (CTL119) enrolled children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL with or without prior exposure to a CAR T cell product. Patients previously treated with CD19-specific CAR-modified T cells were eligible if they met 1 of 3 criteria: 1) CD19+ relapse 2) no response to prior CAR T cell therapy or 3) early B cell recovery indicating poor persistence of CAR T cells. Patient-derived T cells were transduced ex vivo with a lentiviral vector encoding a CAR composed of CD3z, 4-1BB, and humanized anti-CD19 scFv domains and activated/expanded with anti-CD3/CD28 beads. The humanized scFv domain was developed by grafting the complementary determining regions of both the heavy and light chains onto human germline acceptor frameworks. Patients received lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine 1 week prior to infusion with CTL119. Results Thirty children and young adults aged 29 mo-24 yr were infused with CTL119. Eighteen patients had received prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). Eleven patients who previously received murine-derived CD19-specific CAR-modified T cells (CTL019, n=7; other, n=4) were retreated for B cell recovery (n=5), CD19+ relapse (n=5), or no response to prior CAR T cells (n=1). CNS disease or other extramedullary disease was the indication for enrollment in 6 and 3 patients, respectively. At assessment 1 month after infusion, 26/30 patients (87%) achieved a complete response (CR), defined as morphologic remission with B cell aplasia. Of 11 patients previously treated with murine CD19-specific CAR-modified T cells, 7 (64%) achieved a CR at 1 month, 4 demonstrated no response. Multiparameter flow cytometry for minimal residual disease (MRD) was negative at a detection level of 0.01% in 5/7 responding patients. Two responding patients with positive MRD progressed to CD19+ relapse at 1.6 and 3 mo. In patients with no prior exposure to a CD19 CAR T cell product, MRD-negative CR was achieved in 19/19 patients (100%). One patient relapsed with CD19+ extramedullary disease at 2.8 mo. With a median follow-up of 4.2 mo (range, 1.0-14.1 mo) for all responding patients in both cohorts, 23/26 remain in remission with 1 proceeding to SCT in remission. B cell aplasia, a functional marker of CD19-targeted CAR T cell persistence, continued for 3 months or more in 11/18 patients with adequate follow-up: 1/6 retreatment, 10/12 CAR-naïve. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 28/30 patients and mild in most patients (grade 1, n=6; grade 2, n=18). Three patients experienced grade 3 CRS requiring supplemental oxygen or low-dose vasopressor support and 1 experienced grade 4 CRS requiring high-dose vasopressor and ventilatory support. Severe CRS was successfully managed with the IL6R antagonist tocilizumab in 3 patients. Neurologic toxicity included encephalopathy (n=5) and seizure (n=4) and was fully reversible. Conclusion In the first study of humanized anti-CD19 CAR T cells, CTL119 induced remissions in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL, including 64% of patients previously treated with murine CD19-directed CAR T cells and 100% of CAR-naïve patients. Further investigation into CAR T cell persistence and anti-CAR responses will be vital to improve durable remission rates in this highly refractory population. Disclosures Maude: Novartis: Consultancy. Barrett:Novartis: Research Funding. Teachey:Novartis: Research Funding. Shaw:Novartis: Research Funding; Vitality Institute: Research Funding. Brogdon:Novartis: Employment. Scholler:Novartis: Patents & Royalties: Royalties, Research Funding. Marcucci:Novartis: Research Funding. Levine:GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences: Consultancy; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Frey:Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Genentech: Employment. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Research Funding. June:Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celldex: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Honoraria; Immune Design: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tmunity Therapeutics: Equity Ownership. Grupp:Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document