Profound Lymphopenia at the Time of ATG Administration Is Not Predictive of Survivals after Allotransplant Using Purine Analogue/Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen

Introduction: Prophylactic T cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) remains a standard of care for GVHD prophylaxis during allotransplant (ASCT). Although the optimal ATG dosing strategy is still unknown, recent studies have reported that recipient absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) at the time of ATG administration may predict survivals in ASCT with unrelated donors, suggesting that the dose (especially at the cut off of <0.1x109/L) and timing of ATG administration must be taken into account (Soiffer et al, JCO 2017; Kennedy et al, BBMT 2018). Our experience on the impact of lymphopenia at the time of ATG administration during allotransplant is reported here. Materials & Methods: All adults transplanted in our department between 01/2009 and 03/2019 with a Purine analogue/Busulfan/ATG based conditioning regimen and PBSC as source of graft from a matched or 9/10 mismatched donor were eligible. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen consisted of fludarabine 30mg/m²/day (d) from d-6 to d-2, busulfan 3,4 mg/kg/d from d-4 to d-3 and ATG (Thymoglobuline, Sanofi, Lyon, France) 2,5 mg/Kg/d, d-2 and d-1 (FB2A2) or the same but with clofarabine 30mg/m²/d in replacement of fludarabine with 1 or 2 d of ATG (CloB2A2/CloB2A1). Reduced-toxicity myeloablative conditioning regimens (RT-MAC) consisted of the same as FB2A2 but with 3 or 4 d of busulfan instead of 2 (FB3A2/FB4A2). All grafts were administered freshly on the day of the collection while patients (pts) had already received ATG. GVHD prophylaxis was ciclosporine alone for pts with a sibling donor while pts grafted with a matched (MUD) or a 9/10 mismatch (mmUD) unrelated donor received ciclosporine+MMF. We exhaustively looked at pts for whom a blood differential was available at the time of ATG administration in order to study the impact on OS, DFS and GRFS (no grade 3-4 acute GVHD, no moderate/severe chronic GVHD and no relapse) of a profound lymphopenia vs not. Results: Of 395 eligible pts, 116 (median follow-up for alive pts: 49 months) were documented with a differential at time of ATG administration, confirming that this analysis is not a routine practice in our department and probably in many centers. RIC was administered in 80 (69%) of the pts including 39 FB2A2, 12 CLOB2A2 and 29 CLOB2A1. RT-MAC was administered in 36 (31%) pts, including 27 FB3A2 and 9 FB4A2. Seventy-six pts had a myeloid disease while 40 had a lymphoid disease. Donor types were siblings (n=33), MUD (n=70) or 9/10 mmUD (n=13). For the entire cohort, 4y OS, DFS and GRFS were 56.2% (47-66), 40.9% (32-51) and 34.5% (26-45), respectively. No difference in survivals was observed between lymphoid vs myeloid pts, pts transplanted with sibling vs other donors, pts receiving a RIC vs a MAC or a CloB2 vs a FB2 RIC regimen. Median ALC at time of start of conditioning was .915x109/L (range: .010-15.780). No difference in terms of survivals was observed when considering pts under this threshold vs others. ROC curve analysis failed to identify a cut-off allowing to predict better survivals according to ALC at the time of ATG administration (ALC/ATG). Median ALC/ATG was .070x109/L (range: 0-2.300). No difference in terms of survivals was observed when considering pts under this threshold vs others. The same was true when considering .100x109/L as ALC/ATG cut-off. Regarding MAC, the median ALC/ATG was .100x109/L with no difference in survivals between pts under or above this value. The same was true for RIC with ALC/ATG cut-offs < median (.055x109/L) or <.100 x109/L. Interestingly, considering pts with ALC/ATG <.100 x109/L within the RIC setting, survivals were similar between those who received 1d (n=25) vs 2d (n=28) of ATG. This analysis was not performed for pts with ALC/ATG >.100 x109/L as only 4 of them received 1d of ATG vs 23 2d. The dose of CD34+ and CD3+ T cells infused had no impact also on survivals. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that profound lymphopenia at the time of ATG administration as part of a RIC as well as a RT-MAC Purine analogue/Busulfan/ATG based conditioning regimen has no impact on outcomes. Moreover, a reduced dose of ATG in RIC pts with profound lymphopenia at the time of ATG administration did not translate into better survivals. Other unknown factors rather than recipient lymphopenia remain to be discovered to optimize individualized dosing of ATG. Disclosures Peterlin: AbbVie Inc: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy. Moreau:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Le Gouill:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Roche-Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support. Chevallier:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Reduced-Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Regimens for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT) in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHL)-a Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121849 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 319-319

Author(s):

Nilanjan Ghosh ◽

Sairah Ahmed ◽

Carlos Litovich ◽

Kwang Woo Ahn ◽

Manoj Khanal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Conditioning Regimens ◽

The Impact ◽

Reduced Intensity

Introduction: Reduced-intensity and non-myeloablative (RIC/NMA) conditioning regimens are frequently used in alloHCT for NHL, because they are associated with decreased non-relapse mortality (NRM) risk in comparison with myeloablative conditioning regimens and allow older patients and patients with comorbidities to receive alloHCT. However, the optimal RIC/NMA regimen in allo-HCT for NHL is not known. Using the CIBMTR database we compared the transplant outcomes between the commonly used RIC/NMA regimens in NHL. Methods: 1823 adult (≥18 years) NHL patients in CIBMTR registry undergoing alloHCT using matched related or unrelated donors, between 2008-2016 were included. Analysis was limited to patients receiving four commonly used RIC/NMA regimens: fludarabine/ i.v. busulfan (6.4mg/kg) (Flu/Bu), fludarabine/melphalan (140mg/m^2) (Flu/Mel 140), fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Fly/Cy) and Flu/Cy with 2Gy Total Body Irradiation (Flu/Cy/TBI). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was limited to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens. Patients who received post transplantation cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included cumulative incidence of NRM, relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD. Probabilities of OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable regression analysis was performed for GVHD, relapse/progression, NRM, PFS, and OS. Covariates with a p<0.01 were considered significant. Results: The study cohort was divided into 4 groups; Flu/Bu (n=458), Flu/Cy/TBI (n=89), Flu/Mel 140 (n=885) and Flu/Cy (n=391). The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The 4 cohorts were comparable with respect to median patient age, gender, donor type, remission status at alloHCT, and use of prior auto HCT. There was no interaction between NHL histological subtype and type of conditioning regimen. Results of multivariate analysis are shown in Table 2. The Flu/Mel 140 regimen was associated with a higher NRM (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.37-2.31; p<0.001) when compared to Flu/Bu. Although the risk of relapse with Flu/Mel 140 was lower when compared to Flu/Bu (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.94); p=0.007), this did not result in an improvement in PFS. Moreover, the Flu/Mel 140 cohort had an inferior OS (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.13-1.59; p<0.001) when compared to Flu/Bu. There was no significant difference in terms of OS, PFS, relapse and NRM between Flu/Bu, Flu/Cy and Flu/Cy/TBI. There was no difference in risk of grade 3-4 acute GVHD across the four cohorts and compared to Flu/Cy/TBI, Flu/Mel 140 had a higher risk of chronic GVHD (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.65; p<0.001). Four year adjusted PFS was 38% for Flu/Bu, 51% for Flu/Cy/TBI, 39% for Flu/Mel 140 and 35% for Flu/Cy (p=0.07). Four year adjusted OS was 58% for Flu/Bu, 67% for Flu/Cy/TBI, 49% for Flu/Mel 140 and 63% for Flu/Cy (p<0.001). Disease relapse was the most common cause of death across all 4 cohorts. Conclusion: This is the largest analysis comparing the impact of various RIC/NMA conditioning regimens on the outcomes of NHL patients undergoing alloHCT. We report that the choice of RIC/NMA conditioning regimen significantly impacted OS. The most commonly used conditioning regimen, Flu/Mel 140 was associated with a higher NRM and an inferior OS. The Flu/Bu, Flu/Cy, and Flu/CY/TBI conditioning regimens appear to provide comparable OS. Disclosures Ghosh: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; SGN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kharfan-Dabaja:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Sureda:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Hamadani:Merck: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Otsuka: Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan Conditioning Regimen in Older Patients: Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122124 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 256-256 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Uday Popat ◽

Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽

Roland Bassett ◽

Amanda L. Olson ◽

Julianne Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Very High

Background: Traditionally, pre-transplant conditioning regimen is given over 4-6 days before hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Delivering higher dose chemotherapy preparative regimen over a longer time period has not been tested previously. We hypothesized that the delivery of myeloablative dose of busulfan over a 3-week period may reduce toxicity and non-relapse mortality (NRM), without affecting relapse, and tested this in a prospective phase II study. Methods: Patients between 18 and 70 years of age with hematological malignancies and adequate organ function, with 8/8-HLA matched related or unrelated donor were eligible. They received a fixed dose of busulfan 80mg/m2 as outpatient on days -20 and -13. Then, fludarabine 40mg/m2 was given on days -6 to -2 followed by busulfan dosed to achieve target area under the curve (AUC) of 20,000 mol/min for the whole course based on pharmacokinetic studies. GVHD prophylaxis was cyclophosphamide (PTCy) 50mg/kg on days 3 and 4 and tacrolimus. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was added to later unrelated donor recipients. All patients received standard supportive care. The primary endpoint was day 100 NRM. Results: We enrolled 52 patients with a median age of 62 (range, 39-69) years. Almost half (n=25, 48%) had AML or MDS and the other half (n=26, 50%) had had CML or MPD; 1 (2%) had multiple myeloma. Low, intermediate, high and very-high disease risk index (DRI) was present in 3 (6%), 34 (65%), 14 (27%) and 1 (2%). HCT-comorbidity index was >3 in 23 (44%) and 1-2 (n=23, 44%). A majority (n=32, 62%) had an unrelated donor. With a median follow up of 14 months (range, 3-23), NRM at day 100 was 1.9% (n=1) and 8% (95% CI, 0-15) at 1 year. Overall survival, progression-free survival and relapse at 1-year were 83% (95% CI, 73-95%), 78% (95% CI, 67-91%), and 14% (95% CI, 4-24%), respectively [Table]. There were no graft failures. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 17 days (range, 13-33) and that of platelets (> 20K/µL, n=45) was 24 days (range, 9-266). Day 100 grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD rates were 37% (95% CI, 23-50%) and 6% (95% CI, 0-12%), respectively; 1-year chronic GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD rates were 9% (95% CI, 0-17%) and 7% (95% CI, 0-14%), respectively. Overall survival at 1-year differed significantly among patients with low/intermediate DRI (94%; 87-100%) and those with high/very high DRI (53%; 31-91%), P=0.001. Conclusion: Myeloablative fractionated busulfan regimen with PTCy GVHD prophylaxis is feasible in older patients, has low incidence of severe acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and NRM and results in promising overall survival. Table Disclosures Popat: Bayer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Bashir:Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; StemLine: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Ciurea:Miltenyi: Research Funding; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: stock holder. Kebriaei:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy; Kite: Honoraria. Nieto:Astra-Zeneca: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Oran:AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Autolous: Consultancy; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Speaker: Other: Speaker; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Molldrem:M. D. Anderson & Astellas Pharma: Other: Royalties. OffLabel Disclosure: Fludarabine & Busulfan as conditioning agent prior to transplant

Download Full-text

Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and Melphalan As Conditioning Regimen for Pediatric Patients with AML in 1st or 2nd CR: A Retrospective Analysis from the AIEOP HSCT Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111805 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2106-2106

Author(s):

Annalisa Ruggeri ◽

Marco Zecca ◽

Franca Fagioli ◽

Adriana Balduzzi ◽

Mattia Algeri ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Pediatric Patients ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Disease Status ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Donor Type

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is largely adopted as post-remissional therapy in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) but with high-risk characteristics (including high-risk cytogenetics or high levels of minimal residual disease at the end of induction therapy) or to rescue patients reaching CR2 after a previous relapse. Busulfan-based regimens represent the standard of care for these patients in association with alkylating agents. One of the most frequent drugs combination used in Europe in pediatric patients is Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide and Melphan (BuCyMel), which provide a potent anti-leukemic effect, despite remarkable extramedullary toxicities, especially in adolescents. We aimed at analyzing the results of children with AML receiving BuCyMel and reported to the AIEOP registry from 2008 to 2015. A total of 182 patients were reported by 15 transplant centers. Median age at HSCT was 9 years (range 0.3-18); 100 patients (55%) were male. Disease status at HSCT was CR1 in 159 (88%) patients and CR2 in the remaining 23 (12%). All patients received the same myeloablative conditioning regimen with BuCyMel and GVHD prophylaxis was mainly based on calcineurin inhibitors, with the addition of methotrexate in unrelated donors recipients. In vivo T-cell depletion/modulation with ATG was used in 90 cases (49.5%). In almost all cases, pharmacokinetics monitoring of Busulfan was performed, with the drug dosage adjusted according to the systemic exposure evaluated after the first dose. Donor type was an HLA-matched family donor (MFD) in 82 (45%) patients and an unrelated donor (UD) in 100 (55%); 154 (85%) patients received bone marrow (BM) as stem cell source, while the remaining patients (15%) were transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Median follow up for surviving patients was 39 months (range 1-111). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment. The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV and grade III-IV aGVHD was 35% (95%CI 28-42) and 11% (95% CI 7-16), respectively. The CI of aGVHD was not different according to the type of donor, being 37% (95%CI 28-50) and 32% (95%CI 24-46) in MFD and UD, respectively (p=0.38). The CI of chronic GVHD at 3 years was 17% (95%CI 12-24), while that of extensive cGVHD was 6% (95%CI 3-10). No difference was found in the CI of CGVHD according to the donor employed (MFD 15% and UD 19%, p=0.49). Overall, the CI of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years was 18% (95%CI 12-26) and 15% (95%CI 10-22), respectively. The CI of relapse and NRM was significantly different according to age at HSCT (using 12 years as cut-off): (Relapse age<12y: 21% (95%CI 15-32) and age>12y: 11% (95%CI 3-32), (p=0.003); NRM age<12y: 10% (95%CI 5-20) and age>12y: 24% (95%CI 15-37), (p=0.005). According to disease status at HSCT the CI of relapse and NRM were as follows: Relapse: CR1: 18% (95%CI 18-26), CR2 15% (95%CI 5-41) p=0.90) and NRM CR1: 14% (95%CI 9-21), CR2 19% (95%CI 8-46) p=0.38). Also, there was no difference in relapse and NRM by donor type, relapse: MFD 16% (95%CI 9-28), UD 19% (95%CI 11-32) p=0.38) NRM: MFD 19% (95%CI 11-34), UD 11% (95%CI 7-20) p=0.62). Causes of deaths were disease recurrence (39%), infections (27%), and GVHD (12%). Three- years overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 74% (95%CI 67-81) and 68% (95%CI 60-70). DFS was 70% (95%CI 60-77) and 67% (95%CI 47-87) for patients transplanted in CR1 and CR2 respectively, (p=0.39); and was 70% (95%CI 59-81) and 65% (95%CI 53-78), p=0.77, for UD and MFD HSCT recipients, respectively. In conclusion, our results confirm the efficacy of BuCyMel in preventing relapse in a large series of pediatric patients affected by AML in CR1 and CR2. Adolescents represent a population of more fragile patients at risk of developing transplant-related fatalities. Optimization of toxicity profile and supportive care could further improve outcomes. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted to assess the best conditioning regimen for children and adolescents with AML. Disclosures Zecca: Chimerix: Honoraria. Locatelli:Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Fludarabine and Melphalan Compared with Reduced Doses of Busulfan and Flurabine Improves Transplant Outcomes in Older MDS Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121970 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 253-253

Author(s):

Betul Oran ◽

Kwang Woo Ahn ◽

Caitrin Fretham ◽

Mithun Vinod Shah ◽

Ryotaro Nakamura ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Dose ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only potentially curative therapy in eligible patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens that have been developed to extend HSCT to older patients resulted in encouraging outcomes. However, several retrospective studies have raised concerns about disease control when RIC is used in MDS and the ideal conditioning regimen has not yet been found. In this study, we aimed to compare two most commonly used RIC regimens; intravenous use of fludarabine with busulfan (FluBu) and fludarabine with melphalan (FluMel). Study population: Through the CIBMTR, after excluding patients with ex-vivo T cell depletion, we identified 1045 MDS patients aged ≥ 60 years and underwent first HSCT with matched related or matched (8/8) unrelated donor (MRD and MUD) using RIC between 2007-2016. RIC was defined via CIBMTR criteria as a regimen that incorporated an IV busulfan (BU) total dose ≤ 7.2 mg/kg or low-dose melphalan (MEL) total dose ≤ 150 mg/m2. By that, we identified 697 MDS patients who received FluBu (BU 6.4 mg/kg: 87%, BU 3.2 mg/kg: 13%) and 448 receiving FluMel (MEL 140 mg/m2: 80%, MEL 100 mg/m2: 20%). Results: The two groups, FluBu and FluMel, were comparable for disease and transplant related characteristics except the more frequent use of ATG or Campath in FluBu group (39% vs. 31%). The median age was 67 in both groups, and 26% and 19% of FluBu and FluMel groups were aged ³70, respectively. Hematopoietic comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was ³3 in 61% and 59% of FluBu and FluMel groups and MDS risk score by CIBMTR at HCT was high/very high in 34% in both groups. FluMel was associated with a reduced relapse incidence (RI) after HSCT compared with FluBu as presented in Table 1 and Table 2. Adjusted RI at 1-year was 43% with FluBu and 25% with FluMel (p=<0.0001). On the other hand, transplant related mortality (TRM) was higher with FluMel compared with FluBu (27% vs. 15%, p=<0.0001). The difference persisted at 2- and 3-years after HSCT as presented in the figure. Since the magnitude of improvement in RI was greater with FluMel than the improvement in TRM with FluBu, disease-free survival (DFS) was improved at 1-year and beyond with FluMel compared with FluBu (48% vs. 41% at 1-year, p=0.030, and 38% vs 28% at 3-years, p=0.0030). These outcome differences remained significant when sensitivity analyses were performed excluding patients who received RIC with either BU 3.2 mg/kg or Mel 100 mg/m2. FluMel, did not lead to higher incidence of severe grade 3-4 aGvHD (HR=1.2, 95%CI, 0.9-1.6, p=0.3) or chronic GvHD (HR=0.9, 95%CI=0.7-1.06, p=0.2). However, grade 2-4 aGVHD was observed more often with FluMel than FluBu (HR=1.3, 95%CI, 1.1-1.6, p=0.006). This led to inferior outcomes of GRFS within the first 2 months with FluMel (HR=1.9, HR=1.4-2.6, p<0.001) but superior outcomes of GRFS beyond 2 months with FluMel compared with FluBu (HR=0.7, 95%CI=0.6-0.8, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that between the two most commonly used RIC regimens in older MDS patients, FluMel was associated with superior DFS and overall survival compared with FluBu due to reduced RI despite higher TRM. Disclosures Oran: AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nakamura:Kirin Kyowa: Other: support for an academic seminar in a university in Japan; Alexion: Other: support to a lecture at a Japan Society of Transfusion/Cellular Therapy meeting ; Celgene: Other: support for an academic seminar in a university in Japan; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scott:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Speakers Bureau. Popat:Jazz: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Alternative Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Sickle Cell Disease in Europe

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111129 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4645-4645 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Barbara Cappelli ◽

Graziana Maria Scigliuolo ◽

Fernanda Volt ◽

Selim Corbacioglu ◽

Josu de la Fuente ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Alternative Donor

Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from an HLA identical sibling is a well-established curative therapy for sickle cell disease (SCD). HSCT from an unrelated donor is a treatment option, but the likelihood of finding a donor varies according to ethnicity and results are still limited. HLA haploidentical relatives can be alternatively used but, to date, only small series of patients have been described. We report outcomes of patients (pts) transplanted with related haploidentical (Haplo) or unrelated (UD) donors grafts and reported to EBMT/EUROCORD databases. Sixty four pts transplanted in 22 EBMT centers between 1991 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Pts were described according to the donor type: haploidentical (n=40) and unrelated (n=24) [adult UD n=19; cord blood (CB) n=5]. The objective of the study was to describe alternative donor transplants for SCD in Europe without performing comparison analyses due to the size and heterogeneity of the groups. Primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS). Median follow-up (FU) was 28 months (range: 1.6-156) [29.5 months (range: 2.1 - 133.5) for Haplo and 24.6 (range: 1.6 - 156) for UD]. Median age at HSCT was 14.2 years (range: 3-31.7) in Haplo and 11.8 (range: 2.1-42.8) in UD, with a predominance of children (<16 years) in both groups (23/40 and 19/24, respectively). Before HSCT, 68% of overall pts were treated with hydroxyurea and 62% received more than 20 red blood cell (RBC) units. RBC alloimmunization occurred in 14% of transfused pts. In both groups, vaso-occlusive crisis and cerebral vasculopathy were the most frequent SCD complications and the main indications for HSCT. Other complications were acute chest syndrome (44%), liver disease (31%) and infection (23%). In Haplo, median year of transplant was 2014 (range: 1991-2017) and in UD 2011 (range: 2004-2015). In Haplo, two major protocols were used: (1) post -transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) with G-CSF primed bone marrow (BM) and a fludarabine+ cyclophosphamide+thiotepa+2Gy TBI conditioning regimen [16 pts and 2 centers performing most (n=13) of the transplants]; (2) a protocol (performed in 2 centers) consisting in the use of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with ex-vivo B and T cell depletion (BT depleted) (15 pts) and a fludarabine+thiotepa+ treosulfan conditioning regimen (14/15 pts). Haplo donors were most frequently the parents [mother (50%), father (29%), brother (14%) and cousin (7%)]. ATG was used in 95% of transplants and the most frequent combination for graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis was mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)+sirolimus in PTCY and MMF+ cyclosporine A (CSA) in BT depleted. In UD, graft source distribution was 14 BM, 5 PBSC and 5 CB. Conditioning regimens were mainly myeloablative (83%) with fludarabine+thiotepa+ treosulfan in 54% of HSCT. ATG was used in 87% and campath in 9% of transplants; GvHD prophylaxis was CSA and methotrexate in 50%. Neutrophil engraftment at 60 days was 95±4% in Haplo and 84±8% in adult UD, after a median engraftment time of 18 and 22 days, respectively. In Haplo, 7 pts experienced graft failure (3 primary and 4 late), of those 3 had a second allogeneic transplant and were alive at last FU, at 16, 16 and 63 months respectively; 1 patient died after rescue with autologous transplant and 3 were alive after autologous reconstitution. In adult UD, 3 pts had a primary and 1 a late graft failure, none of them had a second transplant and were all alive at last FU, at 2, 13, 28, 118 months respectively. Grade II-IV acute GvHD at 100 days was 25±7% in Haplo and 21±9% in adult UD; acute GvHD grade III-IV was observed in 3 pts in Haplo (none in BT depleted) and 2 pts in adult UD. Chronic GvHD was observed in 10 pts in Haplo (5 extensive, 3 of these in PTCY) and 3 pts in adult UD (2 extensive). OS at 3 years was 88±4%; being 89±5% in Haplo (88±8% for PTCY, 92±8% for BT depleted) and 94±5% in adult UD. 3-year event free survival was 58±7%; in detail, 60±9% in Haplo (56±12% for PTCY, 68±13% for BT depleted) and 60±12% in adult UD. Overall, 8 pts died (5 Haplo and 3 UD) due to infections or GVHD. Among the 5 pts receiving CB transplant 3 are alive (1 of which after graft failure and a second allogeneic transplant). Conclusion: This preliminary analysis shows that, despite an acceptable OS, rejection and chronic GvHD are still of concern; therefore alternative donor transplants for SCD should be performed in experienced centers with prospective clinical trials. Disclosures Pondarré: Blue Bird Bio: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Addmedica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zecca:Chimerix: Honoraria. Locatelli:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy. Bader:Medac: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Riemser: Research Funding; Neovii: Research Funding; Cellgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bernaudin:AddMedica: Honoraria; Pierre fabre: Research Funding; BlueBirdBio: Consultancy; Cordons de Vie: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

First Reported Case Series of Concomitant Ruxolitinib and Ibrutinib for Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148071 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4885-4885

Author(s):

Thomas A Gagliardi ◽

Jordan Milner ◽

Cassey Paula ◽

Mehmet Ozkayank ◽

Oya Levendoglu-Tugal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lung Biopsy ◽

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Case Series ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Graft Versus Host ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) is a complication that occurs in 30-70% of hematologic malignancy patients post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) (Flowers, February 2021). Steroid refractory GVHD has led to studies approving ruxolitinib and ibrutinib as the first FDA approved therapies for steroid refractory GVHD. Ruxolitinib is approved to treat acute GVHD (aGVHD) and inhibits Janus associated kinase (JAK). Ibrutinib is approved to treat chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and functions by inhibiting Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK). Here we describe 2 cases of patients who received both drugs for their GVHD. Patient #1 was a 4-year-old female who had a diagnosis of NK cell dysfunction. The patient underwent a conditioning regimen with melphalan 140 mg/m2, fludarabine 30 mg/m2 X5, and alemtuzumab for 5 days. The allogeneic HCT was performed with cells from a 9/10 NMDP donor and received a CD34+ enrichment with T cell addback of 2.1 x10^5 CD3/kg. Tacrolimus was given for GVHD prophylaxis. The patient developed aGVHD stage 2, grade 3 of the gut on day +148. Patient received steroids, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), and cellcept, and the GVHD resolved. The patient then developed skin GVHD on day +189 (stage 1, grade 3) that resolved. Approximately 15 months post-transplant there was concern the patient was developing cGVHD of the skin and gut (chronic though stable diarrhea), and therefore ibrutinib was initiated day +490 at 140 mg daily. The cGVHD persisted despite ibrutinib, ECP, tacrolimus, and sirolimus. Ruxolitinib was then initiated 2.5 mg bid on day +883. Patient demonstrated stable to slightly improved GVHD and tapered ibrutinib to 110 mg between days +951 and +980. The patient remained on ruxolitnib and ibrutinib as of day +1172. Patient #2 was a 1-year-old male with sickle cell anemia. The patient was transplanted under a haploidentical protocol from the mother, receiving a CD34+ enrichment with T cell addback of 2x10^5 CD3/kg. The conditioning regimen was busulfan 2 mg/kg, fludarabine 30 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg, and thymoglobulin 2 mg/kg with tacrolimus as GVHD prophylaxis. Patient was experiencing fevers, dyspnea and CT was concerning for an infiltrative process. Broad spectrum antibiotics did not improve symptoms. A lung biopsy was performed and bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) was diagnosed on day +217 (pathology confirmed GVHD). The pathology report was reviewed at an outside institution, raising the question of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) in context of hemolysis markers (high LDH and low platelets). Patient was placed on Fluticasone, Azithromycin, and Montelukast (FAM). Due to persisting BOOP confirmed on lung biopsy on day +407, the patient started ibrutinib 140 mg daily on day +411 and was started on ruxolitinib 2.5 mg bid on day +412. ECP commenced on day +414. Within 1 month, symptoms improved. Lung CT imaging appeared stable since initiation of these modalities. Patient continued with ruxolitinib, ibrutinib and ECP (twice per week) for GVHD, though the ruxolitinib dose was tapered in half starting day +477. Symptoms have improved. Discussion: To our knowledge this is the first reported case series of concomitant use of ruxolitinib and ibrutinib. A literature search (PubMed and abstracts in society meetings) was conducted that found 1 paper focused on ruxolitinib for cGVHD with 3 patients on concomitant ibrutinib, but without further details (Ferreira et al., June 2021). Our cases represent a proof-of-concept approach to GVHD management and demonstrate the feasibility of administrating both agents. The combination was well-tolerated with no significant adverse events noted. Neither patient had to discontinue due to poor tolerance or interactions. We expect this dual-drug therapy will become more common going forward given FDA approvals for both ruxolitinib and ibrutinib. Recently, ruxolitinib underwent a successful trial for glucocorticoid-refractory cGVHD when compared to best available therapies, including ibrutinib, though the drugs were not tested in combination (Zeiser et al., July 2021). These findings may open the door for further concomitant use, especially if ruxolitinib is approved by the FDA for cGVHD. We propose further investigation into dual therapy of these drugs in cGVHD either compared to steroids or as a second line option. Disclosures Cairo: Jazz Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nektar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Ruxolitinib is being used here for chronic GVHD, while it is FDA approved for acute GVHD.

Download Full-text

Transplantation for Congenital Sideroblastic Anaemia Is Feasible and Offers Outcomes Comparable to Other Transfusion Dependent Anaemias. a Joint Retrospective Study of the Paediatric Diseases and Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Parties (PDWP/SAAWP) of EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142397 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 45-47

Author(s):

Josu de la Fuente ◽

Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽

Paul Bosman ◽

Robert F Wynn ◽

Miguel Díaz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Graft Failure ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Response To Treatment ◽

Variable Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade Ii

Congenital sideroblastic anaemias (CSA) are a rare group of disorders characterized by the presence of pathologic iron deposits within the mitochondria of erythroid precursors (ring sideroblasts) in the bone marrow due to heterogenous germline mutations leading to defects in mitochondrial heme synthesis, iron-sulfur (Fe-S) cluster biogenesis, or protein synthesis. Patients present with anaemia and relative reticulocytopenia, and systemic iron overload secondary to chronic ineffective erythropoiesis, leading to end-organ damage. The disease is heterogenous underlying the genetic variability and the variable response to treatment. Although a number of CSA patients have received a bone marrow transplant, the outcomes and toxicities are not known. This status makes it very difficult to understand the role of BMT in the management of CSA. A search in the EBMT database identified 28 patients receiving a HSCT for CSA between 1998 to 2018 by 24 participating centres. The median year of transplantation was 2014 (IQR 2004-2016). The distribution was equal between males (n=14) and females (n=14). The median age at transplantation was 7 years of age (3-10 years). Fifteen patients had a sibling HSCT (88%), one a family matched donor HSCT (6%) and one an unrelated matched (6%), the type of transplant being unknown in others (n=11). The source of stem cells was bone marrow in 20 cases (74%), peripheral blood in 4 cases (15%), cord blood in 2 (7%) and combined bone marrow and cord in one (4%). Five cases had a Bu/Cy based conditioning regimen, 4 had Bu/fludarabine based regimen and three fludarabine/treosulfan based conditioning with the rest having a variety of approaches. Eighty-six percent of cases had serotherapy with ATG or alemtuzumab. The median follow-up was 31.6 months (95% CI, 12.2-74.1%). The overall survival at 12 and 24 months was 88% (76-100) and 82% (66-99), respectively (figure 1). The median neutrophil engraftment was 18 (15-21) days and platelet engraftment >20 x 109/L was 29 (20-51) days, with a graft failure incidence of 7% (0-17) at 12 months. Two patients suffered from VOD. There were four deaths, three of which were related to transplant complications. The event free survival (survival without graft failure, relapse and second transplant) at 12 and 24 months was 85% (72-99) (figure 2). Six patients developed acute GvHD grade II and one case grade III; giving a grade II/III incidence of 28% (10-46). There was one case of limited and one of chronic GvHD, giving an incidence of 11% (0-26%) at 12 months and 24 months. In conclusion, whilst HSCT for CSA is a rare occurrence, these data demonstrate that HSCT for this condition is feasible and the outcomes are in keeping with those obtained for transplantation for transfusion dependent anaemias during the same time-period. Disclosures Handgretinger: Amgen: Honoraria. Moraleda:Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Sandoz: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses. Risitano:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samsung: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amyndas: Consultancy; RA pharma: Research Funding; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Achillion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Peffault De Latour:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Severe Aplastic Anemia Post Allogenic Stem Cell Transplant with Mycophenolate and Calcineurin Inhibitor for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-144995 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4879-4879

Author(s):

Omar Albanyan ◽

Hyejeong Jang ◽

Seongho Kim ◽

Andrew Kin ◽

Asif Alavi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Grade Ii ◽

Matched Donor

Abstract Introduction: Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare hematopoietic stem cell disorder characterized by hypocellular marrow and pancytopenia. Multiple factors play an important role in treatment approach include age, comorbidities, degree of pancytopenia and availability of stem cell donor to either immunosuppression irrespective (IST) or allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). The use of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen has improved the outcomes, however the choice for post-transplant GVHD prophylaxis remain a topic of debate. The use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used as an alternative for methotrexate (MTX) as has shown to be associated with lower incidence of mucositis and shorter time to engraftment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive adult patients with SAA who underwent alloSCT at Karmanoc Cancer Institute. All patients received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin for conditioning regimen with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. MMF was started at day -3 at 15 mg/kg three times daily and stopped at day +30 in the absence of active GVHD. The primary objectives were to estimate cumulative incidence of acute (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were to evaluate time to engraftment, days of hospitalization and incidence of mucositis. Results: From January 2005 and May 2019, 33 patients with SAA underwent alloSCT. Patient characteristics are detailed in Table 1. Median age was 36 years (range, 18-71). Twenty-seven patients received bone marrow stem cells (82%) and six patients received peripheral blood stem cells (18%). Thirty patients (91%) received 8/8 HLA matched donor and three patients (9%) received 7/8 HLA matched donor. Sixteen patients (48%) received stem cells from sibling donor and 17 patients (52%) received stem cells from unrelated donor. Thirteen patients (39%) had received IST prior to alloSCT, and 20 patients (61%) received upfront alloSCT. For GVHD prophylaxis all patients received MMF and CNI (tacrolimus=32, and cyclosporine=1). Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 15.8 months for patients who received IST prior to alloSCT and 2 months for patients who received upfront alloSCT. Median time to platelet engraftment was 13.5 days and neutrophil engraftment was 12 days, while one patient experienced graft failure. The median number of days for hospital stay were 25 days. Four patients (11%) developed grade I-II mucositis, no grade III-IV mucositis was observed in the first 30 days and 6 patients had CMV reactivation. The 100-day cumulative incidence rate of grade II-IV aGVHD was 21.2% (95% CI, 9.2 - 36.5), grade III-IV aGVHD was 9.1% (2.3-21.9) and 1-year CIR of cGVHD was 21.2% (95% CI, 9.2-36.5). Comparing patients who received IST prior to alloSCT versus upfront alloSCT, the 100-day CIR of grade II-IV aGVHD was 30.8% (95% CI, 8.2 - 56.5) and 15% (95% CI, 3.6 - 34.0), respectively, (Gray p=0.26) and the 3-year CIR of cGVHD was 39.6% (95% CI, 13.1 - 65.5) and 27.8% (95% CI, 9.2 - 50.3), respectively, (Gray p=0.37). Comparing patients who received alloSCT from related versus unrelated donor, 100-day CIR of II-IV aGVHD was 12.5% (95% CI, 1.9 - 33.6) and 29.4% (95% CI, 10.2 - 51.9), respectively, (Gray p=0.26), and the 3-year CIR of cGVHD was 34.2% (95% CI, 11.4 - 58.9) and 29.4% (95% CI, 10.1 - 52.0), respectively (Gray p=0.90). Median follow up of surviving patient was 5 years (95% CI, 3.1-6.8). Three-year OS was 87% (95% CI, 75.7- 99.9) and median OS was not reached. Six patients died by the time of the analysis, one patient died from graft failure (86 days after transplant from 8/8 HLA MUD), two patients died due infectious complications (808 days and 1637 days after transplant), three patients died due to multiorgan failure (215, 297 and 1097 days after transplant). Conclusion: Our data with use of CNI and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis for SAA following alloSCT with nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen showed that the rate of mucositis was low, engraftment time was rapid, and hospitalization was short, while OS, rates of acute and chronic GVDH were comparable to previously published rates with CNI and MTX-based GVHD prophylaxis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Modi: Genentech: Research Funding; Seagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MorphoSys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deol: Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

No Improvement of Overall-Survival in Children with High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Stem Cell Transplantation in 1st Complete Remission.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.320.320 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 320-320 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Dirk Reinhardt ◽

Bernhard Kremens ◽

Martin Zimmermann ◽

Josef Vormoor ◽

Michael Dworzak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

High Risk ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Children And Adolescents ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Hla Typing ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

The Impact

Abstract One aim of the AML-BFM 98 study was to evaluate prospectively the impact of matched sibling donor (MSD)-SCT in 1st complete remission (CR) in children with high-risk (HR)-AML. Patients: Between 7/1998 and 3/2004 494 children and adolescents were enrolled in the studies AML-BFM 98 and the AML-BFM 98 Interim 2003. Patients with favorable cytogenetics [t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17)], corresponding morphology (AML FAB M1/2 with Auer rods, M4eo, M3) and < 5% blasts on day 15 were defined as standard risk (SR)-group (n=177). All others were stratified to HR-group (n=317) and eligible for SCT in 1st CR. Out of 275 patients achieving 1st CR (87%) 63 patients had a MSD and 188 had no MSD (intent-to-treat group, ITT) while 24 patients had to be excluded due to missing HLA typing or initial refusal to SCT. Thirty-six patients received MSD-SCT (=as-treated group), another two children were transplanted from a matched unrelated donor (MUD) although an MSD was available. The reasons not performing SCT in 1st CR in the remaining 25 children with a donor available were early relapse (n=7), death in CR (n=2), clinical reasons (n=8), or refusal of SCT (n=8). Chemotherapy (CHT) only was given in 192 patients (n=167 without MSD, n=25 with a MSD). Another 21 children were transplanted from an unrelated donor (n=18), family donor (n=1), haploidentical donor (n=2). The reasons were slow response, very poor cytogenetics or other clinical reasons. Treatment: All patients received double induction and consolidation. MSD-SCT in 1st was scheduled after 4 blocs of treatment. Children who were not transplanted in 1st CR received intensification and a 1-year maintenance therapy. The recommended conditioning regimen consisted in busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Results ITT analysis revealed no significant differences in of 5 year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between children with or without a donor (no donor vs. donor: DFS 43±4% vs. 47±7% plog rank 0.52; OS 56±4% vs. 58±9%, plog rank 0.16). The as-treated analysis gave similar results: CHT only vs. MSD-SCT: DFS 35±11% vs. 59±9% p Mantel-byar 0.13; OS 59±13% vs. 62±12%, p Mantel-byar 0.51). The major reasons of treatment failures were relapses in all groups [CHT only n=100 (52%), MSD-SCT n=13 (34%), MUD-SCT n=9 (50%)]. A 2nd CR was achieved in 71% of the CHT only group (n=74). After SCT in 2nd CR, OS was 40±6%. By contrast, only two children (9%) of 22 children after relapse following SCT in 1st CR could be salvaged. Severe late adverse events (e.g. severe chronic GvHD CTC grade IV, destruction of big joints, intracerebral bleedings) were more frequent in children transplanted in 1st CR (15%) than in those with CHT only (including SCT in 2nd CR; 5%, p×2< 0.05). Conclusion: In the population-based, prospective multi-center study AML-BFM 98 allogeneic MSD-SCT in 1st CR showed no advantage in children and adolescents with HR-AML. Considering the higher toxicity of allogeneic SCT, in the ongoing trial AML-BFM 2004, this SCT (MSD or MUD) is restricted to patients in 2nd CR and refractory AML.

Download Full-text

One Antigen HLA-Mismatched Related and 8/8 Allele Matched Unrelated Donors Are Associated with Similar Survival after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Leukemia.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.965.965 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 965-965

Author(s):

David Valcarcel ◽

Fangyu Kan ◽

Tao Wang ◽

Stephanie J. Lee ◽

Stephen R Spellman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Gvhd ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Free Survival ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Unrelated Donors ◽

Related Donor ◽

Disease Free

Abstract Patients in need of an allogenetic hematopoietic cell transplant but who lack an HLA genotypically identical sibling donor, are faced with the decision to consider a single HLA antigen mismatched related donor, or a search for a suitable 8/8 matched unrelated donor. We compared the outcomes of adult patients (≥18 years old) receiving a transplant for the treatment of AML or ALL in first or second remission from either a one-antigen mismatched related donor (MMRD group, N=89) reported to the CIBMTR or an 8/8 HLA-A, B, C and DRB1 allele matched unrelated donor (UD group, N=700) facilitated by the NMDP between 1995–2005. MMRD group was typed by serological or DNA-based methods for HLA-A, -B and –DR with all results verified by lab report review. The UD group was retrospectively typed for HLA-A, B, C and DRB1 by high resolution typing methods. Most received myeloablative conditioning regimens (77%), calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis (100%) and T cell replete grafts (100%). 13% received ATG with the conditioning regimen. Median follow-up was 54 and 38 months in the MMRD and UD groups, respectively. The MMRD group was younger (median age 35 vs 43, p=0.002), had more ALL patients with low-risk cytogenetics (43% vs 18%, p=0.005), had older donors (median age: 38 vs 34, p=0.047), were more likely to receive methotrexate for GVHD prophylaxis (89% vs 77%, p=0.014) and were more likely to be transplanted prior to 2001 (62% vs 24%; p<0.001). There were no differences in patient or donor gender, diagnosis, disease-status, cytogenetic-risk of AML, time from diagnosis to transplant, stem cell source, conditioning regimen, use of ATG and Karnofsky index. Univariate comparisons (MMRD vs. UD) showed: 3-year OS (42% vs 44%, p=0.647), 3-year DFS (41% vs 41%, p=0.931), 3-year TRM (39% vs 31%, p=0.136), 3-year incidence of relapse (20% vs 28%, p=0.094), grade III–IV acute GVHD by 100 days (22% vs. 15%, p=0.147), chronic GVHD by 1 year (35% vs 47%, p=0.029). All multivariate analyses were adjusted for patient and transplant characteristics and are shown in the table below. In summary, transplants utilizing one-antigen mismatched related and 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donors did not significantly differ in overall survival or disease free survival, but chronic GVHD was more frequent after UD transplantation. Outcome RR (MMRD vs. UD) 95% CI p-value Survival 0.99 0.73–1.34 0.94 Disease-free survival 1.06 0.80–1.41 0.69 Treatment related mortality 1.14 0.77–1.69 0.52 Relapse 0.81 0.50–1.30 0.38 Acute GVHD III–IV 1.53 0.91–2.57 0.11 Chronic GVHD 0.58 0.39–0.85 0.006

Download Full-text