Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival Among a Patient Cohort of Relapsed/Refractory Mycosis Fungoides in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom

Background and Aim: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) wherein those with advanced stage have a poor prognosis. The objective of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and survival in MF patients who were refractory or had relapsed after a first systemic therapy. Methods: A retrospective chart review study was conducted at 27 sites in Europe. Patients enrolled had a diagnosis of MF and proved to be relapsed/refractory (R/R) prior to 1-Jan-2016 after a first systemic therapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated from the date of R/R event (defined as the index date) using Kaplan-Meier estimates. PFS was defined as death, progression, second relapse or refractory, or presence of subsequent treatment after index date. Results: This study included 104 advanced R/R MF patients with a median age of 54.5 years (range: 21-82). The median follow-up was 3.5 years (range: 0-20.7) after index date. In total 80% of patients experienced a second R/R, with a median time to second R/R of 15.8 months (range: 0.6-174.6). The median age at death was 65 years (range: 42-85). In total 39 deaths (37.5%) were observed. Among those patients who had a known cause of death (N=35), 18 died of CTCL progression, 11 of CTCL complication or drug toxicity and 7 of other causes. The estimated median OS was 11.5 years (95% CI: 6.5 - not reached). The median PFS was 1.3 years (95% CI: 1.0-2.1). Conclusions: The high rate of R/R and low PFS suggest that the clinical burden of R/R MF is significant in five European countries, and recently approved targeted therapies have the potential of improving outcomes. Disclosures Bagot: Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Illidge:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Div of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Univ of Manchester, National Institutes of Health and Research Biomedical Research Center, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, Christie Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust: Employment. Dalal:Takeda: Employment. Zomas:Takeda: Employment. Trinchese:Takeda: Employment. Little:Takeda: Employment. Bent-Ennakhil:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG: Employment. Ortiz-Romero:Actelion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; 4SC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; miRagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PLCG1: Patents & Royalties; Kyowa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEDA: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

High-Dose Melphalan in 1 Day Versus over 2 Days Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation As Consolidation Treatment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147860 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3944-3944

Author(s):

Mesire Aydin ◽

Man Wai Tang ◽

Marielle Wondergem ◽

David C. de Leeuw ◽

Jurgen J. Wegman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Consolidation Treatment ◽

Cell Counts ◽

High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Background High-dose melphalan (HDM) at 200 mg/m2 is a myeloablative consolidation treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is administered in 1-day or divided over 2-days. Although the 1-day regimen (lower AUC) has been shown to result in significantly less gastro-intestinal toxicity, it is not completely clear whether this administration strategy has any deleterious effects on efficacy, compared to the 2-day regimen. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of 1- or 2-day dosing of HDM on disease remission, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with MM. Methods Data from two academic centers in Amsterdam that have recently merged were used for the analysis, with one of the centers using the 1-day regimen and the other the 2-days regimen. A total of 265 patients with MM divided over the 1-day group (n=174) and 2-day group (n=91) treated between July 2017 and February 2020, were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least very good partial remission (≥VGPR) at day ±90 post-ASCT. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of hospitalization post-ASCT, engraftment period of neutrophils and platelets, and complications (other than mucositis) during hospitalization. Results Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Remission status of ≥VGPR was comparable between the 1-day and 2-day groups (84% vs. 80% respectively). After a median follow-up of 21 months, OS (92% vs. 91%) and PFS (80% vs. 81%) were comparable in the 1-day and 2-day group respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of hematologic adverse events between the 1-day and 2-day groups (neutropenia; 98% vs. 100%, thrombocytopenia; 90% vs. 96% respectively). Median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC >0.5 x10 9 L -1) was significantly shorter in the 2-day group than in the 1-day group (14 days vs. 18 days, p = 0.002). Median time to platelet engraftment (platelets >20 x10 9 L -1) was comparable between the groups. Lower CD34+ cell counts were administered in the 1-day group compared to the 2-day group (2.6 vs. 3.4 x10 6/kg, p <0.0001). A significant negative correlation between the reinfused CD34+ cell counts and time to neutrophil engraftment was found (R= - 0.244). Table 2 shows the number of hospitalization days after ASCT. The median number was 18 days in the 1-day group and 15 days in the 2-day group (OR 1.22, 95% C.I. (1.10-1.35), p <0.0001). Incidences of infectious complications, febrile neutropenia and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions were not different between the groups. Conclusion The use of 1-day HDM as consolidation treatment in MM patients resulted in equal disease response, progression-free survival and overall survival as compared to 2-day HDM. Based on the results of this study showing comparable efficacy and earlier findings of reduced toxicity with the 1-day HDM administration, we recommend the 1-day protocol for HDM. Interestingly, our results also confirmed that patients might benefit from higher counts of reinfused CD34+/enucleated cells. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wondergem: Novartis: Honoraria. de Leeuw: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Biemond: Sanquin: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. van de Donk: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Research Funding. Zweegman: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nur: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Telomere Length Predicts for Outcome to FCR Chemoimmunotherapy in CLL

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114448 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1854-1854

Author(s):

Kevin Norris ◽

Peter Hillmen ◽

Andy Rawstron ◽

Robert K. Hills ◽

Duncan M Baird ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Telomere Length ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Genomic Instability ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

University Patents ◽

The Mean

Abstract Telomeres are structures that cap the ends of chromosomes and play a critical role in maintaining genomic integrity. Telomere length is a key determinant of telomere function, with short telomeres being subjected to aberrant DNA repair activity that leads to telomere fusion and large scale genomic rearrangements. Single telomere length analysis (STELA) is a high-resolution approach to determine telomere length and is capable of detecting telomeres within the length range at which fusions can occur. Using STELA, we have previously shown a link between short telomeres, telomere fusion and genomic instability in CLL. We went on to define the telomere length threshold at which the chromosome end-capping function is lost resulting in telomere fusion events and genomic instability, the so-called 'fusogenic' range. We have shown that dividing patients with CLL into those with telomeres inside the fusogenic range (IFR) and outside the fusogenic range (OFR) is powerful prognostic tool. Consequently, we developed a high-throughput version of the assay (HT-STELA) to allow for rapid evaluation of large numbers of clinical samples. In this study, we used HT-STELA to evaluate whether telomere length could predict for outcome following fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (FCR)-based treatment using samples collected from two concurrent phase II studies, ARCTIC and ADMIRE (n = 275). Patients with a mean telomere length IFR had significantly shorter progression-free survival (P<0.0001; HR=2.17) and shorter overall survival (P=0.0002; HR=2.44) when compared to patients with a mean telomere length OFR. In contrast, CD38 expression and β2-microglobulin were not informative and IGHV mutation status was only predictive of progression-free survival (P=0.0016; HR=1.9). Bifurcation of the IGHV-mutated and unmutated subsets according to telomere length revealed that patients with short, dysfunctional telomeres in each subset had shorter progression-free survival (HR = 4.35 and HR = 1.48 respectively) and shorter overall survival (HR = 3.81 and HR = 2.18 respectively). Although the mean telomere length of the IGHV-unmutated group was significantly shorter than the IGHV-mutated group (P<0.0001), patients with long (OFR) telomeres in both subsets has a significantly better overall survival (P = 0.025; 79% at 5 years and P = 0.006; 83% at 5 years respectively). Indeed, the overall survival of the OFR and IFR subsets were not significantly different regardless of IGHVmutation status (P = 0.61; HR = 1.24 and P = 0.41; HR = 1.47 respectively). In multivariate modelling using Cox proportional hazards with forward selection, telomere length was the dominant co-variable for progression-free survival (P=0.0002; HR=1.85) and overall survival (P=0.05; HR=1.61); when telomere length was added into the model no other parameter retained independent significance in the presence of telomere length. Taken together our data suggest that telomere length is a powerful predictor of outcome to FCR-based treatment and could be used to inform the design of future risk-adapted clinical trials. Figure 1. Stratification of patients by telomere length predicts for progression-free and overall survival following FCR-based treatment. Bifurcation of the patient cohort according to the previously defined telomere length threshold for telomere dysfunction was predictive of (A)PFSand (B) OS. Patients whose telomere length were ≤ the mean of the fusogenic range (IFR) showed shorter PFS and OS than those patients with mean telomere length outside of the fusogenic range (OFR). (C) In terms of OS, the short telomere subsets in both (C)IGHV-mutated and (D)IGHV-unmutated groups showed significantly reduced survival. It is of particular interest that the OS of patients with (E)long telomeres (OFR) and (F) short telomeres (IFR) were not significantly different in IGHV-mutated and IGHV-unmutated groups. Disclosures Norris: Cardiff University: Patents & Royalties: Telomere measurement patent. Hillmen:Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Hills:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria. Baird:Cardiff University: Patents & Royalties: Telomere measurement patents. Pepper:Cardiff University: Patents & Royalties: Telomere measurement patents. Fegan:Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Napp: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Phase II Multi-Center Trial Of Pentostatin Plus Cyclophosphamide With Ofatumumab (PCO) In Older Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4177.4177 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4177-4177 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Marco Montillo ◽

Davide Rossi ◽

Marina Motta ◽

Giulia Quaresmini ◽

Marianna Rossi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Anti Cd20

Abstract Introduction The seminal phase 3 trial conducted by the German CLL Study Group demonstrated that the addition of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody [mAb] rituximab to the FC platform (FCR) improved response rates, progression free survival and also overall survival. However, FCR showed considerable hematologic toxicity, particularly among patients over age 70. Pentostatin demonstrated similar response frequency to other purine analogues in CLL. Furthermore, its relative lack of myelotoxicity has allowed to use it with improved tolerability particularly when administered in combination with myelotoxic agents such as cyclophosphamide. Ofatumumab is a fully human anti-CD20 mAb with clinical activity as a single agent in patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL. Ofatumumab appears to have greater single agent clinical activity than rituximab in patients with previously treated CLL and also has activity in rituximab-refractory patients. Given the reported efficacy of chemo immunotherapy [CIT] in CLL and the activity and toxicity profile of pentostatin combinations, we designed a trial of pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and Ofatumumab for previously untreated older patients with CLL. Methods Patients with CLL who required therapy (2008 NCI-WG guidelines) aged ≥ 65 years and ECOG PS of 0-2 were enrolled to receive Pentostatin 2 mg/sqm and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/sqm both as intravenous infusions at day 1 of each 21 day cycle and Ofatumumab administered as intravenous infusions (Cycle 1: 300 mg day 1 and 1000 mg day 2, subsequent cycles: 1000 mg at day 1). Ofatumumab premedication included acetaminophen, antihistamine and glucocorticoid. Treatment duration was of 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) including detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) and secondary endpoints included, progression-free survival (PFS) overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients 49 patients from 12 centres from the italians regions of Lombardy and Piedmont were included. Baseline demographics were: Median age 72.8 years with 64% aged over 70, among them 32 were males (65%). Disease characteristics in 32 patients evaluable at this point were: 76% Binet stage B and 24% C; 45% of patients had unmutated IGVH, 7 % showed 17p deletions. Results ORR was 93.7% with 41% CR(11)/CR(2) with incomplete marrow recovery [CRi]. All six intended courses of treatment were administered to 30 (94%), and 90% of these patients received full-dose treatment. The reason for discontinuing treatment before completing six courses was myelosuppression occurring in 2 patients. The primary reason for dose reduction was again myelosuppression. Grade ≥3 AEs that occurred from start of treatment until 60 days after the last dose were experienced by 62% of patients receiving PCO with the most common being neutropenia [Total number of patients with at least one Grade 3 or 4 event: 19 patients] while anemia and thrombocytopenia were detected only as grade 1 to 2 in 41% and 25% of cases respectively. Of the grade 1 to 2 toxicities, fever occurred in 2 patients (6%), hypotension occurred in 2 patients (6%), nausea and vomiting occurred in 3 patients (9%), skin rash of grade 1 occurred in 2 patients. Grade 3 infusion-related AEs were reported in 12% of patients. There were no grade 4 toxicities associated with any Ofatumumab infusion. Grade 3 infection was reported in 1 patient (3%) being a pneumonia. No deaths during treatment occurred in these 32 subjects. Conclusion Ofatumumab added to Pentostatin and Cyclophosphamide demonstrated clinically important results and is well tolerated in patients with previously untreated CLL. In this preliminary report the efficacy of this ofatumumab-based CIT compares favorably to the historical rituximab-based CIT using the same chemotherapeutic agents with a more manageable side effect profile in this older population. Further data in a higher number of enrolled patients and including MRD detection will be presented at the Meeting. Disclosures: Montillo: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rambaldi:Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Italfarmaco: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Extending Metronomic Therapy to 28 Days (metro28) for Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5395.5395 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5395-5395

Author(s):

Xenofon Papanikolaou ◽

Carolina Schinke ◽

Sharmilan Thanendrarajan ◽

Adam Rosenthal ◽

Nathan Petty ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Board ◽

University Of Arkansas ◽

Medical Sciences ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Despite the enormous progress in MM therapy brought about by the rapid development of many novel agents, many patients end up with limited treatment options. We have previously reported on the efficacy and safety of metro16 in RRMM (Papanikolaou, Haematology 2013). Here we are reporting on an extension of such treatment to 28 d (metro28). Patients and Methods: The treatment consisted of a cycle of 28d continuous iv infusions of ADR and DDP each at 1mg/m2/d, along with thalidomide 50 to 100mg/d x 28; bortezomib 0.8 to 1.0mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28; DEX 8 to 12mg on days 1-4, 7-10, 13-16, 19-22, 25-28; some patients also received vincristine 0.07mg flat dose by CI for 28 days. This was off-protocol therapy that patients provided written informed consent for. The IRB permitted data retrieval and analysis. Results: 150 patients were identified, virtually all had received prior tandem transplants, bortezomib, lenalidomide, carfilzomib and pomalidomide. The median age was 64yr; B2M was elevated >=3.5mg/L in 48%, abnormal cytogenetics (CA) were present in 86%, and 44% had GEP70-defined high risk MM. Figure 1 portrays clinical outcomes. As of April 2015, 60 patients had died, and the 2-yr OS estimate was 45% (Figure 1A); the 6-mo PFS estimate was 31% although 15% had no progression at 18mo (Figure 1B). Analysis by GEP70 and GEP5 risk revealed 18-mo OS estimates of 80% among the 53 patients with low risk in both models, whereas the presence of high risk (HRMM) in either model conferred a significantly reduced 18-mo OS estimate of 25% (p<0.0001) (Figure 1C). On Cox regression analysis, OS was independently adversely affected by GEP5 HRMM (47%, HR=3.43, p<0.001), LDH >=ULN (25%, HR=3.46, p<0.001), low albumin (39%, HR=2.68, p=0.003), B2M >=3.5mg/L (51%, HR+2.63, p=0.014) and thrombocytopenia <50,000/uL (15%, HR=2.3, p=0.043). GEP5 HRMM was the sole adverse variable affecting PFS (HR=2.37, p<0.001). Most patients received metro28 in the outpatient setting, and side effects were mild. Conclusion: Metro28 represents a well-tolerated additional tool in the treatment armamentarium for RRMM. Figure 1. Clinical outcomes A: Overall survival B: Progression-free survival C: Overall survival according to GEP70 and GEP5 risk designations Figure 1. Clinical outcomes. / A: Overall survival. / B: Progression-free survival. / C: Overall survival according to GEP70 and GEP5 risk designations Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures Schinke: University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Thanendrarajan:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Rosenthal:Cancer Research and Biostatistics: Employment. Petty:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Zangari:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Heuck:Celgene: Consultancy; Foundation Medicine: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Millenium: Other: Advisory Board. van Rhee:University of Arkansa for Medical Sciences: Employment. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Yaccoby:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Morgan:Weismann Institute: Honoraria; CancerNet: Honoraria; MMRF: Honoraria; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Davies:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Barlogie:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment.

Download Full-text

Interim or End of Treatment FGD-PET Complete Response Does Not Have Adequate Predictive Value in Mature T/NK Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1813.1813 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1813-1813

Author(s):

Tatyana Feldman ◽

Larysa Sanchez ◽

Patrick Toth ◽

David Panush ◽

Lori A Leslie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Research Funding ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction: Cure rate of Mature T/NK cell lymphoma (TCL) is rather low and multiple trials are being conducted to improve frontline therapy outcomes. Consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant is becoming widely used as a mean of improving survival (SCT). Based on data from several retrospective trials, pts who achieve CR may not benefit from consolidative SCT. There is no data available on the role of PET-CR as defined by using Deauville criteria (which became standard in response assessment of NHL (The Lugano Classification 2014)). We performed retrospective analysis of 59 pts with TCL examining the correlation between PFS/OS and iPET and eotPET. Methods: 59 pts newly diagnosed pts with TCL treated between 2008-2016 for whom interim and eotPET scan were available. It was our routine practice to obtain baseline, interim (after 3 cycles of chemotherapy) and eotPET. Pathology slides of outside cases were centrally evaluated by a hematopathologist to confirm diagnosis. Baseline, interim and eotPET were centrally reviewed by a nuclear medicine radiologist blinded to clinical outcomes who assigned Deauville score (DS) to every PET. Responses were recorded according to the Lugano classification 2014. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate the Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS), two-sided Log-rank test was used to compare OS and PFS between PET groups. Results: Detailed demographic is presented in Table1. Median age at diagnosis is 59, sixty two percent males, 37% female; ALCL 34%, PTCLnos 22%, AITL 19%, and ATLL 10%; most of pts were advanced stage. Most common chemotherapy regimens used were CHOP/CHOEP, HCVAD, and CODOX, SMILE. Median follow up time for the entire cohort was 22.7mo. Forty nine percent of pts progressed and 29% of pts died during follow up. Cause of death for majority of pts was disease progression. Following Deauville scores were assigned on iPET and eotPET respectively: DS1 in 37% and 39%, DS2 in 30% and 35%, DS3 in 15% and 6%, DS4 in 9% and 4%, DS5 in 9% and 16%. We analyzed mPFS and mOS for PET-CR using DS1-2 or DS1-3 to define it. Sixty seven percent and 82% were considered in PET-CR on iPET based on DS 1-2 and DS 1-3 respectively. PET-CR went up to 77% and 83% respectively on eotPET. For final analysis, DS1-2 was used to define PET-CR as no statistically significant difference in mPFS and mOS was noted between DS1-2 and DS1-3. With median follow up of 22.7mo, two-year mPFS and mOS for the cohort were 50% and 74% respectively. Two- year mPFS for iPET-CR and eotPET-CR were 62%. Two-year mOS for iPET-CR and eotPET-CR were 86%% and 83%. Two-year mPFS for iPET-PR and eotPET-PR were 37% and 67%. Two-year mOS for iPET-PR and eotPET-PR were 70% and 100 % (not statistically significant difference with PET-CR mPFS and mOS). None of the pts with PD on iPET were alive at two year. Two-year mOS for eotPET-SD and eotPET-PD are 40%. Negative predictive value of iPET and eotPET is 61%, positive predictive value is 65% and 72% respectively. Conclusion: While PET-SD and PD is quite predictive of poor survivorship, significant number of PET-CR pts will relapse. Even though PET-CR rate to frontline therapy is high, it does not translate into durable responses for significant number of pts with TCL. Thus, PET-CR is not a sensitive enough measure to be considered as a predictor of long-term remission in TCL. It is important to develop response assessment tools which will correlate better with long term survivorship of TCL patients. Figure 1 Overall survival stratified on PET response Figure 1. Overall survival stratified on PET response Figure 2 Progression free survival stratified on PET response Figure 2. Progression free survival stratified on PET response Disclosures Feldman: Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Leslie:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Skarbnik:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Mato:Theradex: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; ProNAi: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Chow:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Protomastro:COTA: Employment. Leslie:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Goy:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Writing support, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Safety and Clinical Activity of Temsirolimus in Combination with Rituximab and DHAP in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma - Report of the Prospective, Multicenter Phase II STORM Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3028.3028 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3028-3028

Author(s):

Mathias Witzens-Harig ◽

Andreas Viardot ◽

Ulrich Keller ◽

Christian Buske ◽

Anne Crombé ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Multicenter Phase

Abstract Purpose. To evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination of the mTOR inhibitor Temsirolimus and a standard salvage regimen (R-DHAP) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods. This is a prospective, multicenter, phase II, open-label study. Patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL with a maximum of two prior treatment lines were eligible. The STORM regimen consisted of Rituximab 375 mg/m² (day 2) and DHAP (Dexamethasone 40mg day 3-6, Cisplatine 100 mg/m² day 3, Cytarabine 2x2 g/m² day 4) with Temsirolimus added on day 1 and 8 of a 21 d cycle, with 2-4 cycles planned. In part I, dose levels of 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg for Temsirolimus were predefined. Based on the observed toxicity profile, the independent data safety committee recommended a Temsirolimus dose of 25 mg given on day 1 and 8 for the part II extension cohort of the trial. Results. We here report on 46 patients (pts), 15 from part I and 31 from part II. Seven pts were not evaluable for response. Of the evaluable 39 patients, median age was 63 and median number of prior regimen was 1. Temsirolimus dose was 50 mg on day 1 and 8 in 7 pts from the part I of the trial and 25 mg in the remaining 39 pts. The overall response rate was 82% (32/39pts) with 22 partial and 10 complete responses. After a median follow up of 10 months for the total study population, median PFS and OS have not been reached (Figure 1A and 1B). Early safety analysis includes preliminary data of 22 pts. The most frequent non-hematologic side effects were nausea (14 pts, 64%), epistaxis (11 pts, 50%), fatigue (12 pts, 55%), fever (11 pts, 50%) and diarrhea (11 pts, 50%). Frequent grade 3/4 events (n>2) included leukopenia (21 pts, 95%), thrombocytopenia (20 pts, 91%), lymphopenia (11pts, 50%), anemia (8 pts, 36%), neutropenia (10 pts, 45%), renal failure (3 pts, 20%) and infections (7 pts, 32%, bladder infection, esophagus infection, central venous access infection, soft tissue infection, mucositis). Two therapy-related deaths occurred (one patient died from sepsis during neutropenia, another from cerebral bleeding, both events occurring after cycle 3). Conclusion. Temsirolimus can be safely added to DHAP and Rituximab with promising activity. Figure 1 Progression free survival Figure 1. Progression free survival Figure 2 Overall survival Figure 2. Overall survival Disclosures Witzens-Harig: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Viardot:Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: travel support; Roche: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Keller:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Spectrum Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Buske:Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Meissner:Amgen: Other: Travel Support; Takeda: Other: Travel Support; Teva: Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Other: Travel Support. LaRosee:Pfizer: Honoraria. Marks:Pfizer: Honoraria. Hess:Celgene: Honoraria; Roche, CTI, Pfizer, Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Updated Analysis of Overall Survival in Randomized Phase III Study of Idelalisib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.231.231 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 231-231 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Andrew D. Zelenetz ◽

Jennifer R. Brown ◽

Julio Delgado ◽

Herbert Eradat ◽

Paolo Ghia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Opportunistic Infections ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Therapies able to improve overall survival in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) CLL are needed. We have previously reported that idelalisib (IDELA), a selective PI3K delta inhibitor, administered in combination withbendamustine/rituximab (BR) improves progression-free survival compared with BR alone after a medianfollowup of 12 months. This study (NCT01569295) was unblinded by the independent data monitoring committee at first interim analysis for efficacy. We now present updated data on overall survival (OS). Methods: Between June 2012 and August 2014, 416 patients (pts) with RR CLL were enrolled in the study across 19 countries. The current analysis data cutoff date of May 2016 represents a median follow-up of 21 months. Progression-free survival based on independent review committee assessment was the primary endpoint of this study, with OS as a secondary endpoint. All pts had completed study treatment with BR. Key eligibility criteria included pts with RR CLL requiring therapy, having received previous purine analog or bendamustine (ineligible if refractory to bendamustine); and anti-CD20 antibody; relapsing or progressing within 36 months of the completion of the last therapy. Patients were randomized to BR for 6 cycles Q 28 days (B = 70 mg/m2 D1, D2 of each cycle; R = 375 mg/m2 C1 and 500 mg/m2 C2-6) and IDELA 150 mg BID or placebo (administered until IRC-confirmed PD), death, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Stratification was based on presence/absence ofdel(17p) and/or p53 mutation (mut), immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV) mutated/unmutated (analysis performed by a central lab), and disease status refractory (CLL progression <6 months from completion of prior therapy) vs relapsed (CLL progression ≥6 months from completion of prior therapy). Crossover was not permitted at the time of PD or unblinding. Results: The ITT population reflects 207/209 pts in the IDELA + BR/BR + placebo arm: 76% male; 42% ≥65 years; Rai stage III/IV 46%; median time since completion of last prior therapy 16 months; pts with high-risk features (del[17p]/p53mut 32.9%, unmutated IGHV 83.2%, refractory 29.8%); median number of prior therapies: 2 (range 1-13); and median follow-up 21 months. All pts have completed study treatment with BR. A total of 65 pts remain on study treatment: 64 on IDELA monotherapy and 1 pt on placebo. Overall by ITT and IRC, 260/416 pts (IDELA/placebo 95/165) have met the primary endpoint of PD or death. Median OS (mo) of IDELA + BR vs BR + placebo was not reached vs 41 (HR = 0.67; p value 0.036; 95% CI 0.47, 0.96) (Figure 1). The safety findings were similar to what we previously reported: Serious AEs occurred in 147 (71%)/94 (5%) IDELA/placebo arms, respectively. The commonly occurring SAEs by system organ class were infections and infestations (41%/23%) and by MEDRA-preferred terms febrile neutropenia 43 (21%)/10 (5%) and pneumonia 35 (17%)/16 (8%) in the IDELA/placebo arms respectively. The total number of pts with opportunistic infections (Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia [PJP]/cytomegalovirus [CMV]) in the IDELA arm was 5/13 vs 0/3 in the placebo arm. Conclusion: IDELA in combination with BR is superior to BR alone with regard to OS in RR CLL. The improvement in OS was observed across risk categories. Opportunistic infections (PJP, CMV) and SAEs were more frequent in the IDELA vs placebo arm. Results of IDELA-containing regimens may be further improved with implementation of adequate PJP prophylaxis and CMV monitoring measures. This regimen represents an important new option for pts with RR CLL. Figure 1. Kaplan-MeierCurve: Overall Survival. Figure 1. Kaplan-MeierCurve: Overall Survival. Disclosures Zelenetz: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Brown:Celgene: Consultancy; Sun BioPharma: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Delgado:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK/Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy. Eradat:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ghia:Adaptive: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jurczak:Celltrion, Inc: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Loscertales:Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. MacDonald:Gilead Sciences: Speakers Bureau. Morschhauser:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. De la Serna:Abbvie: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Shadman:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pocock:Gilead Sciences: Other: Sponsorship to attend the EHA 2016 Meeting; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria. Adewoye:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Simpson:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stilgenbauer:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants , Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety (27 months) of the Biosimilar CT-P10 in Patients with Low Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-135999 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 27-28

Author(s):

Larry W Kwak ◽

Juan Manuel Sancho ◽

Seok-Goo Cho ◽

Hideyuki Nakazawa ◽

Junji Suzumiya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Time To Progression ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Travel Costs ◽

Single Transition ◽

Second Year

We assessed long-term safety and efficacy of CT-P10 and rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma (LTBFL), and following a single transition from rituximab to CT-P10. This double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled phase 3 trial randomized patients with CD20+ LTBFL to receive CT-P10 or US-sourced rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenous). Induction therapy (weekly for 4 cycles) was followed by a 2-year maintenance period for patients achieving disease control (CR, CRu, PR and SD). During the maintenance, CT-P10 or rituximab were administered every 8 weeks (6 cycles) in the first year and additional CT-P10 was administered every 8 weeks (6 cycles) in the second year. Secondary endpoints (reported here) were overall response rate during the study period, progression-free survival, time-to-progression, and overall survival. Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated over the study period. Between Nov 9, 2015 and Jan 4, 2018, 258 patients were randomised (130 CT-P10; 128 rituximab). Over the study period, 115 (88%; CT-P10) and 111 (87%; rituximab) patients achieved overall response. At a median follow-up of 29·2 months (IQR: 26·1-33·7), median progression-free survival, time-to-progression, and overall survival were not estimable. The KM estimates (95% CI) for OS at 36 months were 98% (93-99) and 97% (89-99) in the CT-P10 and rituximab groups, respectively. Corresponding values for PFS were 80% (70-87) and 68% (54-79), while results for TTP were 82% (72-88) and 68% (54-79) in the CT-P10 and rituximab groups, respectively. (Figure A. OS; Figure B. PFS and Figure C. TTP) Over the study period, 114 (88%) and 104 (81%) patients in the CT-P10 and rituximab groups, respectively, experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 14 (11%) patients in each group experienced TE-serious adverse events (TESAEs). There were no unexpected safety findings observed during the second year of the maintenance period after single transition from rituximab to CT-P10. Figure 1 Disclosures Kwak: Celltrion Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xeme Biopharma/Theratest: Other: equity; CJ Healthcare: Consultancy; Sellas Life Sciences Grp: Consultancy; Enzychem Life Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Antigenics: Other: equity; InnoLifes, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pepromene Bio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion, Inc.: Consultancy. Sancho:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; Gelgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Menne:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel costs, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel costs, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jurczak:Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland: Current Employment; Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Acerta: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; MeiPharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Trneny:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses. Ogura:Cellgene: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Denovo Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MejiSeika Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundi Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SymBio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TevaTakeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Pfizer: Research Funding; Donga: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirn: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; JJ: Research Funding. Lee:Celltrion, Inc.: Current Employment. Kim:Celltrion, Inc.: Current Employment. Ahn:Celltrion, Inc.: Current Employment. Buske:Roche, Janssen, Bayer, MSD: Research Funding; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Celltrion: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Rituximab monotherapy to LTBFL patients

Download Full-text

Progressive but Previously Untreated CLL Patients with Greater Array CGH Complexity Exhibit A Less Durable Response to Chemoimmunotherapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2406.2406 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2406-2406

Author(s):

Neil E. Kay ◽

Jeanette Eckel Passow ◽

Esteban Braggio ◽

Scott Van Wier ◽

Tait Shanafelt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcome ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Copy Number ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Genomic Complexity ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Gains And Losses

Abstract Abstract 2406 The outcome for a given CLL patient is difficult to predict. While there are promising models, they require collation of multiple clinical and laboratory parameters, and it remains to be seen whether they will apply to typical CLL patients in the community. To further dissect out explanations for this dramatic clinical heterogeneity, we sought to understand genomic complexity of clonal B-cells as a possible explanation of clinical variability with specific application to genomic complexity as a predictor of therapeutic response and clinical outcome in CLL. Thus we wished to identified global gains and losses of genetic material in order to define copy-number abnormalities (CNA) in 48 clinically progressive CLL patients who were about to be treated on a chemoimmunotherapy protocol. This protocol was previously reported by us (Blood. 109:2007) and had an induction phase with pentostatin (2 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles and then responding patients were followed ever three months until relapse. In order to estimate CNA, we employed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) using a one-million oligonucleotide probe array format on the leukemic B-cells from the 48 patients entering this trial. In those same patients, the aCGH data were compared to a) FISH detecxtable data using a panel for the common recurring genetic defects seen in CLL and b) to their clinical outcome on this trial. With aCGH we found that 288 CNA were identified (median of 4 per patient; range 0–32) of which 215 were deletions and 73 were gains. The aCGH method identified most of the FISH detected abnormalities with a complete concordance for 17p13.1- deletion (17p-) between aCGH and FISH. We also identified chromosomal gain or loss in ≥6% of the patients on chromosomes 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 17. We found that CLL patients with ≥15 CNA had a significantly worse progression free survival (PFS) than patients with <15 CNA (p=0.004)(figure). Patients with ≥15 CNA also had a shorter duration of response than those with <15 CNA (p=0.0726). Of interest, more complex genomic features were found both in patients with a 17p13.1 deletion and in more favorable genetic subtypes such as 13q14.1. Thus, for 5 patients with >15 CNAs the following FISH patterns were seen: +12/13q14.1-x1/13q14.1 -x2, 13q14.1 ×1 (n=2), and 17p13.1 (n=2). In addition, a 17p- by FISH was positively associated with the number of CNA and total deletion size. The odds of having an overall response decreased by 28% (95% CI: 5–55%; p=0.015) with each additional CNA for the 17p13.1- patients. In addition to defining genomic complexity as the total number of CNA for each patient, we also defined complexity as the sum of the lengths of all interstitial chromosomal gains and losses. When defined as the total size of chromosomal gains or losses, genomic complexity was significantly associated with 17p13.1 and worse overall clinical response. In summary, this analysis utilized the global assessment of copy number abnormalities using a high-resolution aCGH platform for clinically progressive CLL patients prior to initiation of their treatment. One outcome was that we found higher genomic complexity was associated with shorter progression-free survival, reduced duration of response and predicted a poor response to treatment. In addition since we did find genomic complexity in more traditionally favorable FISH categories, such as 13q14.1 type defects, this may explain why some of the latter patients do not fare as well as might be expected even with aggressive chemoimmunotherapy approaches. This study adds information on the association between inferior trial response and increasing genetic complexity as CLL progresses. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Pentostatin. Kipps: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Memgen: Research Funding; Igenica: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Tandem Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants (AuHCT) with or without Maintenance Therapy (auto-auto) Versus Single AuHCT Followed by HLA Matched Sibling Non- Myeloablative Allogeneic HCT (auto-allo) for Patients with Standard Risk (SR) Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results From the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 0102 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.41.41 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 41-41 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Amrita Krishnan ◽

Marcelo C Pasquini ◽

Marian Ewell ◽

Edward A. Stadtmauer ◽

Edwin P Alyea ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Response Rates ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Matched Sibling

Abstract Abstract 41 AuHCT improves survival in patients with MM, but disease relapse and progression remain a challenge. Both tandem AuHCT and post transplant maintenance therapy improve progression-free survival (PFS). Alternatively, allogeneic HCT has the potential to reduce disease progression through a graft-versus-myeloma effect. Use of nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens allows the latter approach to be used with reduced treatment-related mortality (TRM). BMT CTN 0102 was a multicenter phase III trial that biologically assigned patients with MM to auto-auto using melphalan 200mg/m2 (MEL 200) conditioning or an auto-allo approach using MEL 200 followed by alloHCT with 2 Gy total body irradiation. Graft-versus-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary endpoint was 3-year progression free survival (PFS). Between December 2003 and March 2007, 710 patients from 43 US centers were enrolled. Patients were assigned to the auto-allo arm based on availability of an HLA-matched sibling donor at time of enrollment. Patients in the auto-auto arm were further randomized to thalidomide and dexamethasone (Thal-Dex) for 1 year or observation (obs). Among 625 patients with SR MM (absence of chromosome 13 deletion by metaphase karyotyping and β-2 microglobulin ≤ 4mg/L), 436 were assigned to auto-auto (217 Thal-Dex, 219 obs) and 189 to auto-allo. Compliance with Thal-Dex was poor, with 84% of patients not completing prescribed therapy. PFS and overall survival (OS) between the Thal-Dex and obs cohorts were equal and these arms were pooled for the primary analysis. The auto-auto and auto-allo groups differed in age (median 55y vs. 52y, p =0.01) and time between first and second transplants (median 98d vs 105d, p =0.02), but were otherwise balanced. Complete and near complete (CR+nCR) response rates at study entry were 24% for both groups. Three-year PFS was 46% and 43% (p=0.67) and 3-year OS was 80% and 77 % (p=0.19) for the auto-auto and auto-allo groups, respectively. Corresponding probabilities for 3-year progression/relapse were 50% and 46% (p=0.8) and for 3-year TRM were 4% and 11% (p=0.04). Among auto-allo patients, probabilities of grade III-IV acute and chronic GVHD were 9% and 47%, respectively. Eighty-two percent of patients in each arm received the assigned second transplant. Among 522 patients who received their second transplant, 3-year PFS was 47% and 44% (p=0.89) with auto-auto and auto-allo, respectively. Disease response rates at day 56 after second HCT were: 50% very good partial response (VGPR) or better and 40% CR+nCR in the auto-auto group; and 49% (VGPR or better, p=0.8) and 48% (CR+nCR,p=0.12) in the auto-allo group. In conclusion, there were no differences in 3-year PFS and OS between patients receiving auto-auto or auto-allo. Potential benefits of graft-versus-myeloma to reduce disease progression or relapse were offset by increased TRM. Thal-Dex maintenance did not improve PFS or OS, likely due to poor tolerability of this regimen. At 3 years, the auto-allo approach for SR MM had no added benefit compared to tandem AuHCT. Disclosures: Krishnan: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Stadtmauer:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Comenzo:Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Elan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Genzyme: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho: Research Funding. Hari:Celgene: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Vesole:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Giralt:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text