scholarly journals Characterizing the Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Children Using the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Dataset (ATHNdataset)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1156-1156
Author(s):  
Jennifer G. Davila ◽  
Dunlei Cheng ◽  
Leslie J. Raffini ◽  
Courtney D. Thornburg ◽  
Fernando F. Corrales-Medina
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring

Background: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children has risen significantly. (Raffini, Huang et al. 2009) There are currently four direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) - apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban - approved for the acute treatment and prevention of VTE in adults. Advantages of these medications over the traditionally used anticoagulants, enoxaparin and warfarin, include fixed dosing, no need for routine laboratory monitoring, few drug interactions and no dietary restrictions. Despite lack of information on the safety and efficacy of these agents in children, pediatric hematologists across the United States are using DOACs in their patients based on extrapolated data from adult studies. The American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN) is a nonprofit network of over 140 federally funded Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs) which provides the infrastructure for clinical and surveillance-based research. ATHN maintains the ATHNdataset (ADS), a "limited dataset" free of protected health information, with data collected on patients with bleeding and clotting disorders at participating HTCs within the Human Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-supported regional hemophilia networks across the US. The authors acknowledge ATHN, the ATHN-affiliated U. S. Hemophilia Treatment Centers and their 39,000+ patients who have contributed their demographic, clinical, and genetic information to the ATHNdataset. Methods: The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of pediatric patients diagnosed with VTE in the ADS, focusing on those patients who received a DOAC. Data were abstracted for patients in the ADS who had acute VTE at age <21 years from January 2010 to March 2019. Data extraction included basic demographics and information about VTE and treatment. Results : A total of 1,094 pediatric VTE cases were captured in the ADS. 577 (52.7%) were male. Caucasians were the most prevalent racial group (n = 809; 74%), followed by African-Americans (n = 203; 18.6%).14.9% (n = 163) were Hispanic. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was the most prevalent pediatric VTE reported in the ADS (n=889, 81.3%), followed by pulmonary embolism and cerebral venous thrombosis (n=130, 11.9% and n=40, 3.7% respectively). VTE location by age group is listed in Table 1. The most common DVT location was the lower extremities or pelvis, comprising 37.5% (n = 333) of all reported DVTs. Upper extremities or upper thorax DVT occurred less often (n = 211; 23.8 %). 345 (38.8 %) cases were reported only as "DVT" without a specific thrombus location. We reviewed 1,051 anticoagulant prescriptions for 650 VTE patients (mean 1.6 prescriptions per person). Enoxaparin was the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant (n = 676 prescriptions; 64.3%) followed by warfarin (n = 178 prescriptions, 16.9%). Interestingly, 116 (11%) patients, from 21 HTCs, had a DOAC prescribed as their anticoagulant regimen. Anticoagulant prescription by anticoagulant starting age is shown in Table 2. Further analysis of the DOAC subgroup showed that rivaroxaban was the most prescribed DOAC with 77.6% (n = 90/116) of the patients using this agent. Apixaban and dabigatran use was also reported (n= 23, 19.8% and n= 3, 2.6% respectively). The majority of DOACs were prescribed for patients older than 13 years of (111/116, 95.7 %). In children between 3 to 6 years of age (n = 3), rivaroxaban was the only DOAC prescribed. DOACs were primarily used to treat DVT of the extremities (84/116 patients). Other scenarios in which DOACs were also prescribed were PE and abdominal venous thrombosis patients (26, and 4 patients, respectively). Anticoagulant prescription by anticoagulant starting age is shown in Table 2. Conclusion: DVT of the lower extremities and pelvis is the most prevalent pediatric VTE in the ADS. Enoxaparin and warfarin remain the main anticoagulant agents used for pediatric VTE treatment. Despite lack of an FDA-approved pediatric indication, hematologists in US-based HTCs are already using DOACs in pediatric patients with VTE. As further characterization of DOAC use in children is needed, the authors, in collaboration with ATHN, are currently building a multi-institutional retrospective and prospective registry, ATHN 15. This registry will serve as a resource for pediatric hematologists to collect real-world use of DOACs in children, as we await the results of prospective clinical trials. Disclosures Davila: Octapharma: Other: Grant to attend VWD meeting ; Genentech: Other: Advisory board; Spire Learning: Speakers Bureau. Raffini:Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; CSL Behring: Other: Advisory Board; Roche: Other: Advisory Board. Thornburg:Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding; Bluebird bio: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Research Funding; Ironwood: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Sanofi Genzyme: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Corrales-Medina:Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Patient Reported Financial Toxicity in Acute Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4796-4796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Knight ◽  
Myra Robinson ◽  
Michael R. Grunwald ◽  
Lauren M. Bohannon ◽  
Erin Blackwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Financial Toxicity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring

Abstract Background: Financial Toxicity (FT) is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in a variety of cancers. Treatment of acute leukemia is associated with heavy healthcare utilization and high costs. The purpose of this study was to define rates, risk factors, and mortality implications for FT in patients with acute leukemia using patient reported data. Methods: All patients seen at the Levine Cancer Institute, a tertiary hospital-based leukemia practice, were surveyed prior to each visit over a six-month period. All patients were aged ≥18 years and were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The survey consisted of the PROMIS Global-10 measure and two questions from the COST measure. FT was defined as scoring 4 or less (maximum: 10) in agreement with the COST questions: "I know that I have enough money in savings, retirement, or assets to cover the costs of my treatment" and "I am satisfied with my current financial situation." Demographic data and disease characteristics were abstracted from the medical record. Model selection was carried out using logistic regression to identify factors impacting the incidence of financial toxicity. Correlation of numerical financial toxicity scores with PROMIS scores and with mortality data was assessed using linear regression. Results: Of the 106 patients, 58 (54%) met the definition of exhibiting FT. The factors associated with incidence of FT included: age, race, and insurance type. The odds of FT in those patients <65 years of age were 2.7 times the odds of FT in those ≥65, adjusting for race, insurance, and time since first treatment (95% CI: 0.884 - 8.438, p = .081). The odds of FT in African American patients were 4.3 times the odds of FT in Caucasian patients, adjusting for age, insurance, and time since first treatment (CI: 0.408 - 44.824, p = .150). The odds of FT in patients with Medicaid insurance were 14.2 times the odds of FT in patients with commercial insurance, adjusting for age, race, and time since first treatment (CI: 1.658 - 121.862, p = .106). Gender, distance from the hospital, type of acute leukemia, history of blood/marrow transplant, and history of relapsed disease were not found to be significant. There was a significant correlation for both the PROMIS global physical (p < .001) and mental (p < .001) scores with the FT score. Lower FT score (higher degree of FT) was associated with lower mental and physical scores. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with FT scores >4 compared to patients with FT scores <=4; however, there was a trend toward decreased survival in those with lower FT scores (Figures 1 and 2). Conclusions: Patients with acute leukemia represent an extremely vulnerable population for financial toxicity with rates of distress even higher than other reported malignancies. Urgent interventions are indicated in this population. Disclosures Grunwald: Medtronic: Equity Ownership; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Avalos:Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Symanowski:Five Prime Therapeutics: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board ; Boston Biomedical: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board ; Eli Lily & Co: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Immatics: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board.

Hemophilia Prophylaxis No Longer Just for Children without Inhibitors - Increasing Use of Prophylaxis in Other Groups (children with inhibitors and adults with and without inhibitors)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3535-3535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Carcao ◽  
Maria L. Avila ◽  
Victor S. Blanchette ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Carmen Escuriola-Ettingshausen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring ◽  
Adults And Children

Abstract Background: Long-term prophylaxis is standard of care in children with severe hemophilia A (SHA) and B (SHB) without inhibitors. Studies have shown benefit from long-term prophylaxis in adults with SH and in both adults and children with SH and inhibitors. Yet there is little data on the prevalence of prophylaxis in these groups. Aim/Methods: To understand the current use of long-term prophylaxis in these groups of patients in countries capable of underwriting the high cost of prophylaxis we surveyed (2013) hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs) in countries where long-term prophylaxis in children is routinely used. Results: 134 HTC from 14 countries in North America, Australasia, and Western Europe reported on 4,763 adults with SH (4,011 SHA; 752 SHB) and on 751 children and adults with inhibitors. Prophylaxis use in these groups is shown in table 1: Table 1. Prophylaxis use in adults with SH (without inhibitors). Adults without inhibitors Children and adults with inhibitors HA HB In ITI setting In non-ITI setting % on Prophylaxis 59 49 29 28 Most common regimen EOD 2 d/wk FEIBA EOD or 3 d/wk FEIBA EOD or 3 d/wk EOD, every other day Adults without inhibitors: A higher proportion of SHA (59%) vs SHB adults (49%) were on prophylaxis (Χ2 p<.001). This was particularly true in the age group of 18-30 y [74% (SHA) vs 60% (SHB)]. For SHA the use of prophylaxis was progressively less in older age groups: 31-40 y (55%), 41-50 y (47%), 51-70 y (39%) and >70 y (29%). There was little drop in the proportion of SHB adults on prophylaxis with increasing age. 67% of SHA adults on prophylaxis were receiving ≥3 infusions/wk while 80% of SHB adults on prophylaxis were receiving ≥2 infusions/wk. Once/wk prophylaxis was reported in 3% of SHA and by 19% of SHB patients on prophylaxis. Daily prophylaxis was rarely reported in both groups. Children and adults with inhibitors: Data was available on 407 children and 344 adults with SH and inhibitors. Table 2 shows the proportion of children and adults on/not on Immune tolerance induction (ITI) and on/not on bypassing agent prophylaxis (BA-P). Most children (78%) were on either ITI (with or without BA-P) or on BA-P alone and as such were having some bleed protection. In contrast only 28% of adults were on either ITI (with or without BA-P) or on BA-P and as such most adults with inhibitors are not on any bleed protection. Table 2. Use of ITI and of BA-P in children and adults with SH (+ inhibitors). 403 children 344 adults On ITI. Not on BA-P 43% 8% On ITI. On BA-P 17% 4% Not on ITI. Not on BA-P 23% 71% Not on ITI. On BA-P 18% 16% In total, 185 patients had received FEIBA prophylaxis while 70 had received rFVIIa prophylaxis. FEIBA prophylaxis was particularly more common (vs. rFVIIa prophylaxis) in the non-ITI setting [FEIBA (n=107 pts) vs rFVIIa (n=33 pts)]. The most common prophylactic FEIBA regimen was EOD or 3/wk while the most common rFVIIa prophylaxis regimen was daily. Conclusions: This survey captured data on 4,763 adults with SHA/SHB and on 751 adults and children with SH and inhibitors. This is the largest survey of prophylaxis in these 2 groups of patients. Given the benefits of prophylaxis in children it is reassuring to observe that prophylaxis in adults (without inhibitors) is more prevalent than previously reported. Use of BA-P in patients with inhibitors still however lags far behind the use of prophylaxis in non-inhibitor patients - particularly in adults. FEIBA is more commonly used for prophylaxis than rFVIIa. Our survey did not capture longterm patient outcome data; this needs evaluation. Note: This abstract includes data presented as separate abstracts at the ISTH 2015 meeting. The data has been combined and analyzed in this abstract to show the increasing use of prophylaxis outside of children without inhibitors. Disclosures Blanchette: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board, Research Funding. Santagostino:CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen/Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Baxter/Baxalta: Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Leissinger:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Aledort:Baxter Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB Participation; Kedrion BioPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals MCL-1 and PKA/AMPK Axis Fuel Venetoclax Resistance in Lymphoid Cancers

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1284-1284
Author(s):  
Vivian M. Liu ◽  
Romain Guièze ◽  
Daniel Rosebrock ◽  
Alexis A Jourdain ◽  
María Hernández-Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Genome Wide

Venetoclax, the first approved BH3 mimetic targeting BCL2, demonstrates high response rate in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but resistant cases are emerging. Aside from BCL2 mutations affecting venetoclax binding, multiple lines of mounting evidence suggest a role for non-mutational mechanisms underlying resistance to this drug. By applying both CRISPR-Cas9 knock-out and ORF overexpression screens in the lymphoma cell line OCI-Ly1, we previously reported the identification of MCL-1 overexpression and of the AMPK/PKA signaling axis in altering energy metabolism underlying venetoclax resistance (Guieze, ASH 2018). Here, we report further in-depth exploration of the impact of these findings, discovered through the analysis of lymphoid cell lines, and of specimens collected from CLL patients developing venetoclax resistance. The resistant lymphoma cell lines that we generated (OCI-Ly1 and SU-DHL4 cells) displayed increased oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) compared to the parental lines, measured by Seahorse assay. We instead observed that venetoclax rapidly perturbs OXPHOS in sensitive cells. This process is dependent on mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, as this effect is abrogated in BAX/BAK1 double knockout (KO) cells. Targeting OXPHOS was shown to synergize with venetoclax in vitro and in vivo, as combination of venetoclax and oligomicin (an inhibitor of the ATP synthase, the complex V of the mitochondrial electron transport chain), was more effective than each drug alone in reducing tumor growth of a subcutaneous NSG xenograft model based on OCI-Ly1. Among the candidate markers driving resistance identified from the genome-wide screens, we focused on AMP pathway members (AMPK and PKA) and the ID3 transcriptional regulator, given that ID3 KO cells demonstrated similar transcriptomic changes than the resistant OCI-Ly1 cells. We found that PRKAR2B (encoding a PKA subunit), already highlighted in our ORF screen, was the top transcript overexpressed when knocking out ID3. To clarify how the dominant-negative transcription factor ID3 regulates PRKAR2B expression, we performed ATAC-seq of the ID3 OCI-Ly1 knockout (vs control) lines in order to determine differential signatures of chromatin accessibility and transcription factor engagement. We showed that ID3 repression leads to genome-wide increased accessibility associated with motifs of the lymphoid transcription factor TCF3. TCF3 has previously been shown to interact with ID3 and to be involved in the transcription of ADIPOQ, which was identified in the GOF screen. TCF3 binding sites were confirmed to be present within putative enhancer regions of PRKAR2B in a B cell context. We then investigated whether our findings could be validated in patient samples. By whole-exome sequencing of matched pretreatment and venetoclax-resistant CLL samples collected from 6 patients, we did not detect any recurrent somatic mutations associated with resistance. The resistant samples from three of 6 patients, however, harbored subclones with 1q amplification in a common region encompassing the MCL1 locus. We identified 4 additional CLL cases relapsing on venetoclax with leukemia samples collected before and after relapse. By immunohistochemical staining of 9 of 10 cases for which tissue was available, we detected increased MCL-1 expression at relapse in 6 of 9 cases (p = 0.026). We furthermore confirmed the involvement of AMPK signaling by detecting evidence of AMPK, ACC and p-ACC expression in 4 of 9 patients (all p = 0.0062). ID3 expression was decreased at matched relapse samples (p = 0.0001), supporting the presence of the resistance circuit we identified above. Taken together, our results identified the increased MCL-1 expression and PKA/AMPK activation as underlying mechanisms for venetoclax resistance. Our data support the implementation of combinatorial therapy with metabolic modulators to address venetoclax resistance. Disclosures Guièze: Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Thompson:AbbVie: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Davids:AbbVie, Acerta Pharma, Adaptive, Biotechnologies, Astra-Zeneca, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, TG therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Research to Practice: Honoraria; AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Genentech, Janssen, MEI, Pharmacyclics, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Verastem: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma, Ascentage Pharma, Genentech, MEI pharma, Pharmacyclics, Surface Oncology, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Research Funding. Brown:AbbVie: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; Loxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Catapult Therapeutics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sun Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Morphosys: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Invectys: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Octapharma: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy; Dynamo Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wierda:Xencor: Research Funding; Cyclcel: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; KITE pharma: Research Funding; Oncternal Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma Inc: Research Funding; GSK/Novartis: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology Inc.: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding. Letai:AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Zeno Pharmaceuticals, Vivid Bioscience, Flash Therapeutics, Dialectic Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Cofounder or Advisory Board member. Neuberg:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigal Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Research Funding. Mootha:Jansen Pharmaceuticals: Other: SAB, compensation; 5am Ventures: Other: SAB, compensation; Raze Therapeutics: Other: Founder, SAB, equity. Getz:MuTect, ABSOLTUE, MutSig and POLYSOLVER: Patents & Royalties: MuTect, ABSOLTUE, MutSig and POLYSOLVER; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; IBM: Research Funding. Wu:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Neon Therapeutics: Other: Member, Advisory Board.

scholarly journals Systematic Review of the Published Evidence on the Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Factor VIII and IX Concentrates

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2818-2818
Author(s):  
Menchen Xi ◽  
Tamara Navarro-Ruan ◽  
Sunil Mammen ◽  
Victor S. Blanchette ◽  
Cedric R. Hermans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Population Pk ◽  
Viii And Ix ◽  
Factor Concentrate

Abstract Introduction: The efficacy of factor VIII and IX concentrates administered to prevent bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A and B is correlated with the plasma levels measured over time after the infusion. The inter-patient variability of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters is large, and it is difficult to assess individual PK profiles due to the need for multiple time points. This is often not feasible, particularly for pediatric patients. Population PK modeling potentially provides a practical solution to this problem. The successful modelling of PK parameters at the population level requires knowledge of disposal characteristics and relevant covariates. We performed a systematic review of the available evidence in order to identify available PK data for factor VIII and IX concentrates to facilitate the implementation of a population PK approach. Methods: We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1997 to May 2014, using the keywords "hemophilia" and "pharmacokinetic". We included only articles that published original PK data for factor VIII and IX concentrates in humans and published in English. Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted the relevant data. Results: We retrieved 237 unique articles published between 1998 and 2013. We excluded 185 articles that did not meet our research criteria. We included 52 articles, with a total of 1365 patients included in PK analyses. 26 articles reported PK data on factor VIII concentrates, 18 articles report PK data on factor IX concentrates, and one article reported on both factor VIII and IX concentrates. Seven articles reported pharmacokinetic data on both factor VIII and Von Willebrand factor concentrates. We extracted the following data: number of patients, type and severity of hemophilia, patient age, factor concentrate infused, dose infused, sampling data points, half-life, clearance, recovery and the model used for pharmacokinetics, and inclusion of patients undergoing surgery or with inhibitors. The main results are summarized in table 1. Conclusions: This review provides the first systematic appraisal of the methods and results of published papers in the field. The data gathered confirms the intra-patient variability of factor concentrate PK and provides useful information on which to build population based PK models. *3 FIX articles and 2 FVIII articles did not report lab test; one article reported PK data for both FIX and FVIII †11 articles reported FVIII PK data for both one-stage clotting and chromogenic assays ǂPapers reporting on long-acting FVIII and FIX were included in the review, but not summarized in the table. For this reason, not all 1365 patients are accounted for in the table §Estimate of the range of the means found in the papers Disclosures Xi: Baxter: Research Funding. Navarro-Ruan:Baxter: Research Funding. Mammen:Baxter: Research Funding. Collins:Baxter: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Neufeld:Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: data safety monitoring board, data safety monitoring board Other; Biogen IDEC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NovoNordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfiser: consultancy, data and safety monitoring board Other; Octapharma: Research Funding. Dunn:CSL Behring,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfiser: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Iorio:Baxter: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfiser: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Increasing Quality Improvement Capability in a Hemophilia Treatment Center

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5908-5908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Thornburg ◽  
Heidi Lane ◽  
Katharine Farrow ◽  
Rosalie Brooks ◽  
Mina Jahan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Social Worker ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Basic Knowledge ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring

Abstract Introduction Persons with hemophilia require complex medical care by a multi-disciplinary team throughout life. There are opportunities for Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTC) to enhance the care of persons with hemophilia through participation in quality improvement (QI) initiatives. Maintaining comprehensive care and excellent health outcomes are national priorities for Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN), the National Hemophilia Program Coordinating Center (NHPCC). Rady Children's Hospital San Diego (RCHSD) HTC participated in the NHPCC Dartmouth Improvement Program pilot program with the aim to develop QI capabilities within the HTCs to enhance the care of persons with hemophilia. Methods RCHSD participated in the NHPCC Dartmouth Improvement Program starting in December 2015. A QI team was established including the HTC medical director, nurse case managers, pediatric social worker and the social worker of the collaborating adult HTC. The QI team was coached by an expert TDIMA coach and a "coach in training" from another HTC. The team learned QI methods through in person training, web-based training and weekly team meetings with the coaches. The team assessed HTC data (The 5Ps-purpose, patients, professionals, processes, and patterns) to gain system knowledge and insights to determine a QI theme, global aim, specific aims and associated PDSA cycles. Results The RCHSD HTC QI team established a QI theme to focus on the transfer from pediatric to adult care. The Global Aim of the team is to improve autonomous communication in RCHSD HTC. The process begins with the 12 year old comprehensive clinic visit and ends with a new patient visit at an adult HTC. By working on the process, we expect patients to have the communication skills to be able to arrange medical insurance, call the home care company to order factor and to communicate their health and personal care needs to adult health care providers. We developed four specific aims which are in various stages of testing in PDSA cycles (Table 1). For Aim 1, we found that patients have only basic knowledge of insurance information. For Aim 2, we found that we needed to adjust our clinic process to make sure that patients receive their "after visit summary" that includes the insurance information prior to leaving clinic. Conclusions We developed a QI program within RCHSD HTC focused on improving transfer of care. Once we have completed the specific aim PDSA cycles we will standardize the new and improved procedures. We will continue to develop the program based on internal needs assessment and family input. This training model may be adapted by other HTCs to enhance patient care. Disclosures Thornburg: Mast Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy; Biogen Idec: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Bluebird inc: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board.

scholarly journals Incidence of Germline ATM Variants in a Consecutive Clinical Cohort of CLL Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1731-1731
Author(s):  
Benjamin L. Lampson ◽  
Svitlana Tyekucheva ◽  
Conner J. Shaughnessy ◽  
Annette S. Kim ◽  
Jennifer R. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Similar Frequency ◽  
Myeloid Malignancy ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring ◽  
Increased Risk

Background The pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains unknown, but first-degree relatives of affected patients (pts) have a 3-to-8-fold increased risk of developing CLL, suggesting an inherited component. Previously, we performed an exome-wide comparison of rare germline variants (vts) among CLL pts compared to controls and identified a 1.8X increased risk of any rare germline ATM vt in CLL pts. Certain vts had much higher relative risk; for example, ATM p.L2307F was associated with a 10X increased risk of CLL (Tiao Leukemia 2017). ATM p.F858L and p.P1054R also imparted a 2X increased risk of CLL in a candidate gene association study (Rudd Blood 2006). Most ATM missense vts have not been fully characterized and are classified as vts of uncertain significance (VUS) in clinical testing. We observed that ATM missense vts were common in our CLL clinic and sought to formally test the hypothesis of association by examining the frequency of ATM missense vts identified by next-generation-sequencing (NGS) routinely sent on hematologic malignancy pts seen at our institution. These pts served as a population with well-characterized diagnoses whose genetics had been uniformly determined by a CLIA-certified lab, allowing us to directly ask whether ATM VUS are enriched in CLL compared to other hematologic malignancies, and whether CLL characteristics differ between pts with and without ATM VUS. Methods The Brigham and Women's Hospital Rapid Heme Panel (RHP) is an NGS assay that interrogates 95 cancer-related genes, including the entire coding sequence of ATM. RHP results were aggregated for all 999 pts who had the test sent from the DFCI Lymphoma clinic (excluding T-PLL) between 7/1/2014 and 5/25/2018. RHP data were also aggregated for 876 pts seen by 3 physicians over the same time in the DFCI Leukemia clinic (acute leukemia and other myeloid disorders). Only vts with a total population allelic frequency (PAF) of <1% are included in RHP results, restricting our analysis to less common vts. Statistical analysis was performed in R. Results Out of 384 pts with CLL or monoclonal B lymphocytosis, 99 pts (25.8%, 95% CI 21.5-30.5%) had at least one ATM vt. 71 different ATM vts were seen, with 10 (14%) deemed pathogenic (nonsense mutations, internal insertions or deletions). All remaining 61 vts were missense vts, and the majority were likely germline: 43 are in the gnomAD germline vt database, and of the other 18, 8 had allele frequencies in blood between 40 and 60%. The most common vts were p.S707P (n = 11 pts), p.L2307F (n=9), p.F858L (n=8), and p.D1853V (n=8), all of which are known to be germline. ATM missense vts were more frequent in CLL (97 pts with missense vts out of 384 total, 25.3%) than in non-CLL lymphomas (91 out of 615, 14.8%, p=0.00006). No other individual lymphoma type had a higher frequency of ATM missense vts than CLL. Missense vts were also more frequent in CLL than in pts seen in the myeloid malignancy clinic (143 out of 876, 16.3%, p=0.0003). When restricting analysis to missense vts with PAFs reported in gnomAD, we found a higher percentage of extremely rare vts (PAFs <0.001%) in CLL pts (7 out of 42 vts, 16.7%) compared to the myeloid malignancy group (2 out of 55, 3.6%, p=0.04); the non-CLL lymphoma pts had a similar frequency of extremely rare vts (5 out of 39, 12.8%, p=0.12). Consistent with a biologic role for these vts, 32% of CLL pts with missense vts had 11q-deleted disease, while only 10.5% of pts without missense vts had 11q-deleted disease (p=3*10-6). Pts with missense vts were also significantly less likely to have TP53-aberrant disease, 10.9% vs. 20.7% (p=0.04), consistent with a mutually exclusive role for ATM and TP53. There was no difference in IGHV mutation status between CLL pts with and without missense vts (56.6% vs 53.4% unmutated, respectively). Conclusion One in 4 CLL pts has an ATM missense vt; these are more frequent in CLL than in other lymphoid or myeloid disorders. Most of these are germline and have previously been classified as VUS. CLL pts with missense vts have a higher frequency of 11q-deleted disease. These results highlight an important role for germline ATM missense vts as contributors to the inherited risk for developing CLL and emphasize the importance of analyzing VUS and constitutional data generated by NGS assays, the latter typically not reported by most laboratories. Disclosures Kim: Papgene, Inc: Consultancy; Quanterix, Inc: Consultancy; LabCorp, Inc: Consultancy. Brown:Juno/Celgene: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Catapult Therapeutics: Consultancy; Dynamo Therapeutics: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; Invectys: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Morphosys: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Sun Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Loxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding.

BTK and/or PLCG2 Mutations in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treated with Ibrutinib: Characteristics and Outcomes at the Time of Progression

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3050-3050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Hampel ◽  
Timothy G. Call ◽  
Sara J. Achenbach ◽  
Kari G Rabe ◽  
Wei Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Resistance Mutation ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Progression Of Disease ◽  
Richter’S Transformation ◽  
Richter's Transformation

INTRODUCTION Mutations in BTK and PLCG2 have been reported to occur in ~80% of CLL patients (pts) who have progression of disease on ibrutinib therapy (Woyach, JCO 2017; Ahn, Blood 2017). These mutations are described as appearing months before actual relapse and thus considered as a potential predictive biomarker for future relapse (Quinquenel, Blood 2019). However, the outcomes of these pts after disease progression are not well described. In this study, we seek to investigate time to next therapy and overall survival (OS) following progression among CLL pts on ibrutinib therapy with and without these resistance mutations. METHODS Between 10/2012 and 6/2019, we identified 34 pts in the Mayo Clinic clinical CLL resource who progressed while receiving ibrutinib therapy and also had testing for BTK and PLCG2 mutation performed as part of routine clinical practice at either NeoGenomics Laboratories or The Ohio State University. OS was calculated from time of ibrutinib progression to last known alive or death date; OS was plotted using Kaplan Meier methods and was compared using the log-rank test between various groups (e.g., mutation positive vs negative; CLL progression vs Richter's). Cumulative incidence of time to next treatment in those who had a treatment after progression was adjusted for the competing risk of death. RESULTS Of 34 pts who progressed while receiving ibrutinib, 26 pts experienced CLL progression and 8 pts had Richter's transformation; baseline characteristics in Table 1A. The presence of a BTK or PLCG2 mutation was found in 20/34 (59%) pts (specific mutations in Table 1B). BTK mutation alone was present in 9 pts, 7 pts had PLCG2 mutation alone, and 4 pts had both mutations. Median time between a positive test and start of next therapy was 4 months (range 1-19 months) and did not vary between BTK vs PLCG2 mutations. Among the 26 pts with CLL progression, 18 (69%) pts had a mutation present: BTK alone (n=8), PLCG2 alone (n=6), both (n=4). Therapy following progression on ibrutinib in these pts was as follows: venetoclax (n=16; 11 pts who continued ibrutinib in combination), idelalisib (n=4), investigational treatments (n=2), continued ibrutinib alone (n=2), dose-adjusted EPOCH-R (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab; n=1), and unknown (n=1). Twelve of the 26 pts with CLL progression on ibrutinib, including 8 pts with a prior resistance mutation detected, had subsequent progression of disease on the aforementioned next line therapy. Treatment of these patients consisted of the following: restarted ibrutinib in addition to current treatment of venetoclax (n=5), venetoclax (n=2), pembrolizumab (n=2; 1 pt with continued ibrutinib), obinutuzumab with continued ibrutinib (n=1), gemcitabine and vinorelbine with continued ibrutinib (n=1), and no further treatment (n=1). Among the 8 pts with Richter's transformation as the initial progression event on ibrutinib after mutation testing, 1 pt had a BTK mutation and 1 pt had a PLCG2 mutation. Treatments following progression on ibrutinib included multi-agent chemoimmunotherapy (n=3; 2 pts received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone [R-CHOP] with continued ibrutinib and 1 pt received doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine [ABVD] alone), pembrolizumab (n=3; 1 pt in combination with continued ibrutinib), venetoclax in combination with continued ibrutinib (n=1), and venetoclax and obinutuzumab (n=1). The median time to next treatment (second line of treatment beyond ibrutinib) for the 31 pts who started another therapy following progression on ibrutinib was 16.7 months (95% CI 9.6-NE; Figure 1A) and was not significantly different for pts with or without a resistance mutation (p=0.57). Median OS for all 26 pts with CLL progression was 28.7 month and there was no difference according to presence or absence of a resistance mutation (median 28.7 months vs 18.2 months, p=0.53; Figure 1B). The 8 pts with Richter's transformation had a median OS of 7.1 months (95% CI 2.0-NE). CONCLUSION Approximately 60% of pts tested in this progression cohort had a BTK or PLCG2 mutation at time of or preceding progression on ibrutinib therapy. OS and time to next therapy did not differ statistically between pts with mutated vs non-mutated clones; however, caution should be applied with the conclusions given the limited sample size. Disclosures Ding: DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Kenderian:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Humanigen: Other: Scientific advisory board , Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding. Kay:MorphoSys: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Other: DSMB; Celgene: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Other: DSMB. Parikh:Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding.

a Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo Controlled Study of IVIG Vs. IVIG with High Dose Methylprednisolone in Rapidly Augmenting Platelet Counts in Childhood ITP

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 868-868
Author(s):  
Manuel Carcao ◽  
Mariana Silva ◽  
Michele David ◽  
Robert J. Klaassen ◽  
MacGregor Steele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Blood Type ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Double Blinded

Abstract The combination of intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone (IVMP) and IV immune globulin (IVIG) is often used in children with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) to rapidly increase platelet counts (PCs) to a safe hemostatic level. However, there are no controlled data to support the use of combination therapy over IVIG alone in children with severe thrombocytopenia [PC <20 x109/L] and/or life-threatening bleeding. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled, multicenter, prospective study to evaluate 2 regimens: IVMP (Solu-Medrol®, UpJohn) 30 mg/kg (max. 1 gram) over 1 hour (h) followed by IVIG 1 g/kg (Gammunex 10%, Bayer) given at a rapid infusion rate (over a maximum of 3 h), vs IV placebo over 1 h followed by IVIG 1 g/kg in children with primary ITP. The goal was to evaluate the rapidity of the PC increment and associated adverse events with both regimens. Eligible patients were children [ages: 1 to 17 years (y)] with acute (defined at the time of study initiation as <6 months (mo.) since diagnosis) or chronic primary ITP (>6 mo.), with PCs <20x109/L in whom it was decided to treat with IVIG. Exclusion criteria included: previous splenectomy, life/organ threatening hemorrhage, renal disease, diabetes, hypertension, sepsis, fever >38.5°C, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pregnancy or a previous documented lack of response to IVIG. Baseline studies included: a complete blood count (CBC), a reticulocyte count, Coombs test and renal and liver function tests. CBCs were repeated at the end of the IVIG infusion, at 8±1h, 24±2h, 72±4h, day 7±2 day (d) and day 21±3d following the start of the placebo/IVMP. The primary outcome measure was the PC increment over the first 24 h following the administration of therapy; the main secondary outcome measures were the attainment of a PC of ≥20x109/L and ≥50x109/L at times + 8, +24 and +72h. Sample size was estimated based on the assumption that patients treated with placebo + IVIG would attain a mean PC at +24h of 30x109/L vs. 50x109/L for those treated with IVMP + IVIG. For 80% power to show a difference in PC of 20x109/L (at +24h)with an a of 0.025 (two-sided) and a b of 0.2, 32 patients were required. Patients were stratified by block randomization according to type of ITP (acute vs. chronic) and according to center. The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT00376077). Thirty two patients were enrolled (ages: median 8 y; min. 1.2 y; max: 17.5 y; 22 male: 10 female; 16 acute: 16 chronic; 11 were blood type O; 14 blood type A and 7 blood type B). Fourteen patients were randomized to IVMP+IVIG while 18 were randomized to placebo+IVIG. Randomization was not equal as 1 patient was randomized and then immediately declined to participate and another patient was incorrectly assigned; both were assigned to the placebo group. PCs for the 2 groups of patients at the different time points are shown in table 1. The difference in PC was statistically significant at the 24 hr time point (p<0.0001). At this time the proportion of patients achieving a PC of ≥50x109/L was 77% in the IVMP+IVIG vs 50% in the placebo+IVIG. No patient experienced a severe bleed or an unexpected severe adverse event during the study. There was a statistically significant drop in mean Hb post-treatment among all patients (baseline 133.3 (13.6) g/L to 121.6 (14.2) g/L at time +8h) but there was no difference between O and non-O blood type patients or between treatment groups. This study showed that PCs increased rapidly following administration of IVIG with or without IVMP such that by 8h post initiation of therapy 55% (17/31) of all patients had achieved a PC ≥20x109/L. The mean PC was significantly different between the groups at time +24h. Our findings provide level 1 evidence to support the use of combination therapy (IVMP+IVIG) in life threatening situations where it is deemed to important to attain as rapidly as possible a hemostatic platelet count. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Blanchette: Shire: Consultancy, Other: Member of a Data Safety Monitoring Board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL-Behring: Research Funding; Octapharna: Other: Member of a Data Safety Monitoring Board; Biogen Idec: Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document