scholarly journals Concurrent Treatment of VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) and Factor Xa Inhibitors Is Associated with Increased Bleeding Risks

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3681-3681
Author(s):  
Sandip Patel ◽  
Tiffany George ◽  
Tzu-Fei Wang ◽  
Sherry Mori Vogt ◽  
Edmund Folefac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitor ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Concurrent Treatment ◽  
Clinically Significant

ABSTRACT Background: Some cancer patients with thromboembolism require dual treatment of VEGFR TKIs and factor Xa inhibitors (direct or indirect), which may contribute to increased bleeding risks. However, the safety of such combination treatment has not been well characterized in the literature or national guidelines. Methods: This is a single center retrospective study, where we identified metastatic cancer patients (renal cancer, colorectal cancer, sarcoma, etc) who received concurrent VEGFR TKIs (pazopanib, sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, regorafenib, vandetanib, lenvatinib or cabozantinib) and Xa inhibitors (low-molecular weight heparin [LMWH] or direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs] including rivaroxaban or apixaban) at the Ohio State University Medical Center. We assessed bleeding risks of dual therapies vs. factor Xa inhibitors alone, using the same patients as self controls. We reviewed medical charts of all identified patients for clinically significant bleeding events (defined as combined major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria). The Cox proportional hazard model was used to compare the differences of time to first clinically significant bleeding event between the groups of concurrent use and anticoagulant use only. Results: A total of 86 patients (26 females and 60 males) were included: 78 Caucasians, 6 African Americans, and 2 others. 81 patients had concurrent TKI and LMWH treatment; 20 patients had concurrent TKI and DOACs; and 85 patients have had been on factor Xa inhibitor alone (LMWH or DOACs) at some point. Some patients had been on both LMWH and DOACs at different time periods. Overall, there were 29 clinically significant bleeding events (including 8 major bleeding) during concurrent treatment and 17 events (4 major bleeding) during factor Xa inhibitor alone over a median follow up of 63 days (52 days for concurrent treatment and 99 days for Xa inhibitor alone). In this self-control study, concurrent treatment was associated with a statistically higher risk of clinically significant bleeding events (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.43-5.64, P < 0.01), which reached 37% patient population in the first 3 months, while the bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitor alone seemed spaced out at the entire length of anticoagulation (8% by 6 months). Similar trend was found in the analysis of patient group of concurrent TKI and LMWH vs. LMWH alone (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.95-4.02, P = 0.067), although significance was not reached likely due to insufficient power. Sample size was inadequate for meaningful comparison between concurrent VEGFR TKI and DOAC vs. DOAC alone. Conclusions: Concurrent treatment of VEGFR TKI and factor Xa inhibitors is associated with a significantly increased bleeding risks when compared with factor Xa inhibitors alone in patients with metastatic cancer. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Analysis of bleeding risk with concurrent treatment of VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and factor Xa inhibitors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19305-e19305
Author(s):  
Tiffany L. George ◽  
Sandip H. Patel ◽  
Tzu-Fei Wang ◽  
Sherry Mori-Vogt ◽  
Edmund Folefac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Concurrent Treatment ◽  
Clinically Significant

e19305 Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) may interfere with the coagulation system making patients susceptible to both hemorrhage and thromboembolism. Some cancer patients require dual treatment with VEGFR TKIs and factor Xa inhibitors. However, the safety of such combination treatment (e.g. bleeding risk) has not been well characterized in the literature. Methods: This retrospective study identified metastatic cancer patients who received VEGFR TKIs (pazopanib, sunitinib, sorafenib, axitinib, regorafenib, vandetanib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, tivozanib) and Xa inhibitors (low-molecular weight heparin [LMWH] or direct oral anticoagulants [DOACs]- rivaroxaban or apixaban) from 2001 to 2018 at the Ohio State University. We assessed bleeding risks of dual therapy vs factor Xa inhibitors alone, using the same patients as self-controls. We defined bleeding based on criteria from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare distribution of bleeding severities and the Cox model was used to analyze bleeding risk. Results: A total of 86 patients were included for analysis, with a median age of 56 (range, 34-88). The patient population was predominantly of male gender (69.7%), Caucasian race (89.3%) and renal cell cancer type (48.9%). As some patients had been on both LMWH and DOAC at different time periods, we found that 81 patients received concurrent TKI and LMWH; 19 patients had concurrent TKI and DOAC. Overall, 25 patients developed 29 clinically significant bleeding events (including 8 major bleeding) during concurrent treatment, and 15 patients developed 17 clinically significant bleeding events (4 major bleeding) during factor Xa inhibitor alone over a median follow up of 63 days. We found a statistically higher bleeding risk with concurrent treatment (HR = 2.23, 95% CI, 1.13–4.42, p = 0.02) compared with Xa inhibitor alone. In a stratified analysis, concurrent VEGFR TKI plus LMWH or DOAC both showed a strong trend for elevated bleeding risk. Although there were increased bleeding events with concurrent treatment, there was no significant difference in the proportion of major bleeding (27.6% vs 23.5%, p = 0.76). Median time to first bleeding event was 56 days for concurrent therapy and 72 days for Xa inhibitor alone. Conclusions: Concurrent treatment of VEGFR TKI and factor Xa inhibitors is associated with significantly increased bleeding risk when compared with factor Xa inhibitors alone in metastatic cancer patients.

A phase I feasability study of concurrent fondaparinux (F) with carboplatin (Crb) and paclitaxel (P) for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An analysis of coagulation/angiogenic biomarker (CABM) kinetics.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19143-e19143
Author(s):  
David James Mooney ◽  
Debi Miley ◽  
Mary Jerome ◽  
Stefan C. Grant ◽  
Francisco Robert
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Bleeding Event ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Endothelial Damage ◽  
Minor Bleeding ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Angiogenic Biomarkers

e19143 Background: There is an association between risk of thrombosis and metastatic cancer. Chemotherapy (C) also independently increases thrombotic risk. This increased risk is multifactorial, including endothelial damage and release of angiogenic cytokines. We hypothesized that adding anticoagulation to C may decrease thrombotic risk and also, potentially, have anti-tumor effect. Methods: The primary aim of this study was to determine the tolerability and safety (bleeding events) of the combination of F with 21-day cycle chemotherapy (Crb AUC 6 + P 200 mg/m2) in two cohorts of untreated patients (pts) with stage IV NSCLC. The secondary objectives were to determine incidence of venous thrombosis (VT), changes in CABM parameters during treatment, and clinical efficacy endpoints. Two cohorts of pts received F from cycles 2-4 with Crb+P. Cohort A received 2.5 mg F daily from cycle 2-4. Cohort B received 7.5 mg of F on day 1, 2 of cycle 2-4 and 2.5 mg F on day 3-21. Results: Clinical data from 19 evaluable pts are as follows: median age 55 years, 63% male, and 32% adenocarcinoma. There was no major bleeding event (BE) in either cohort, and 5 pts had a minor BE. There was no VT. Median time to progression was 5 months (3.8-6.2 months), and overall survival was 10 months (4.3-15.6 months). Baseline values of sensitive markers of activated coagulation (D-Dimer, Thrombin Anti-Thrombin Complex) were above the normal range in most patients. These biomarkers tended to increase during the first cycle (without F); whereas the same markers decreased during the second cycle (with F). A reduction of the angiogenic biomarkers during therapy was observed with VEGF, TGF-β1, and Angiopoietin-1. Conclusions: Concurrent treatment with F and chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC is feasible with no major bleeding and little minor bleeding. During chemotherapy, coagulant and angiogenic biomarkers tended to increase, perhaps suggesting an increase in thrombogenic state. When F was added, these markers trended downward, suggesting that the proangiogenic state associated with cancer may be significantly altered by anticoagulation. Clinical trial information: NCT00476216.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors in 795 Morbidly Obese Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 423-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Kushnir ◽  
Yun Choi ◽  
Ruth Eisenberg ◽  
Devika Rao ◽  
Seda Tolu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Morbidly Obese ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Prescription Date ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Background: Studies of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) have shown comparable therapeutic efficacy and similar or lower bleeding risk for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to warfarin. Because the representation of morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥40 kg/m2) in pivotal clinical trials has been minimal, efficacy and safety of DOACs in this population are unclear. Our goal was to investigate whether direct oral factor Xa inhibitors, apixaban and rivaroxaban, are as effective and safe as warfarin in morbidly obese (BMI ≥40) patients. Methods: Using our institutional database, we identified all adult patients at Montefiore Medical Center with BMI ≥40 who were started on anticoagulation with apixaban, rivaroxaban or warfarin, for either AF or VTE, between March 1, 2013 and March 1, 2017. We reviewed charts to obtain detailed information on patient demographics and to document clinical outcomes of recurrent VTE, ischemic stroke (CVA) and bleeding from the first prescription date to the earliest of a thrombotic event, discontinuation of medication, death, or June 30, 2017. VTE and CVA episodes were confirmed by imaging (compression sonography, CT scans, ventilation/perfusion scans, MRIs). Bleeding events were classified according to criteria from the Control of Anticoagulation Subcommittee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Analyses were stratified by anticoagulation indication. Chi-squared tests or Fisher's exact tests were used to assess statistical significance of the differences in VTE, CVA and bleeding rates between anticoagulant cohorts. Differences in times from first prescription date to VTE, CVA and bleeding were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Data were adjusted for age, CHA2DS2-VASc, and Charlson scores. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m2. Results: Data on 795 patients were collected. In 366 patients with a history of VTE, the rates of recurrent VTE were low and comparable among the apixaban, rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts [1/47 (2.1%), 3/152 (2%), and 2/167 (1.2%), respectively, p=0.74]. In the subgroup of individuals with BMI ≥50 kg/m2 (n=92), none of the 40 DOAC patients had recurrent VTE. The rates of clinically relevant bleeding, including major bleeding, among VTE patients, were comparable between the three cohorts. Among the 429 patients with AF, stroke rates were also low and similar among anticoagulant cohorts [1/103 (1%) for apixaban, 4/174 (2.3%) for rivaroxaban, and 2/152 (1.3%) for warfarin, p=0.71]. CVAs were similarly rare in patients with BMI ≥50 (1/19 patients on apixaban, 0/37 on rivaroxaban and 1/44 patients on warfarin). In the AF sample, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of bleeding, including major bleeding, among the 3 cohorts. In an analysis with combined DOAC cohort (apixaban + rivaroxaban vs. warfarin), the recurrent VTE and stroke rates were still low and comparable. There were more major bleeding events in AF patients on warfarin than the combined DOAC cohort (7.9% vs. 2.9%, p=0.02), a finding that became non-significant when adjusted for age, CHA2DS2-VASc, and Charlson scores (p=0.06). The rates of bleeding, including major bleeding, were comparable among the three anticoagulants in both VTE and AF patients with BMI ≥50. Conclusions: Our study is the largest study examining morbidly obese patients on DOACS and provides further evidence of comparable efficacy and safety of the direct oral anti-Xa inhibitors, compared to warfarin, in morbidly obese patients with AF and VTE. Disclosures Kushnir: Janssen: Research Funding. Billett:Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding.

Thromboembolic and Bleeding Events Following Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 501-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Murnaghan ◽  
Jeffrey Gollish ◽  
Deborah Murnaghan ◽  
Helen Razmjou ◽  
Andrea Donovan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Spiral Ct ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitor ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Ct Angiogram ◽  
Total Knee

Abstract Abstract 501 Introduction & Purpose: Rivaroxaban is an oral Factor Xa inhibitor which has been licensed in Canada since 2008 and the United States since 2011 for the prevention of thromboembolic events following total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Multicentre research trials have shown clinical efficacy for prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim of this study was to prospectively document the incidence and timing of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients who received rivaroxaban as the primary prophylaxis in clinical practice. Methods: Prospective, observational study of patients given oral Factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban) following primary and revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). All patients were approached to participate and consent obtained. Patients treated with Rivaroxaban 10 mg po daily starting Post-Operative Day (POD) #1 and continued for 15 days. This protocol was approved for use at this institution and is NOT consistent with manufacturer's recommended dosing. All participants were followed up at 6 weeks and 3 months. Doppler ultrasound or venograms used to diagnose symptomatic proximal DVT at or above the popliteal vein. Spiral CT angiogram, angiogram or ventilation/perfusion V/Q scan were used to diagnose PE. All Doppler Ultrasound reports were reviewed by a radiologist to confirm findings and all spiral CT, CT angiogram or ventilation/perfusion scans or images were reviewed (where possible) to verify findings. Bleeding complications were documented as ‘on prophylaxis’ starting 2 hours after first dose of anticoagulant therapy until 24 hours after the 15thdose. All major and non-major bleeding events were reviewed by an internist to confirm severity of bleeding episode. Event rates are reported. Data reported on consented patients only. Research ethics approval was obtained for this study. Results: From June 2010 to Dec 2011, 2888 patients underwent total joint arthroplasty. Two thousand five hundred and thirty-five (88%) agreed to participate in the study. One hundred and fifty patients were treated with thromboprophylaxis other than rivaroxaban. Two thousand three hundred and forty-two were followed up at 3 months (98%). Forty-three patients were lost to follow-up. Complete data on 2342 patients is reported: 905 men, 1437 women with mean age 66 years. Total knees 1353 (primary 1229, revision 123, uni 1). Total hips 989 (primary 899, revision 90). DVT: Three DVT were reported at 6 weeks. Nine additional DVT's were reported at 3 months: 5 primary TKA and 6 Primary THAs 1 Rev THA. Total DVT= 12/2342= 0.5% (see Fig 1). PE: There were 7 confirmed PE during the first week post op: 6 primary TKA and 1 primary THA. Three additional PE's 6 weeks: 3 THA and 1 TKA. Five additional PE's reported at 3 months:4 THA and 1 TKA. Total PE 16/2342=0.7% (See Fig 2). Death: There have been 4 perioperative deaths. None were related to surgery, DVT, pulmonary embolism or bleeding. Bleeding: No major and 9 non-major surgical-site bleeds occurred. All but one were in primary THA. One major and 6 non-major non-surgical site bleeds occurred in patients who received rivaroxaban. Two additional major Non-surgical site bleeds occurred after having received rivaroxaban: one patient received only one dose of rivaroxaban and the other occurred 3–4 days after completion of treatment. Overall Major bleeds 0.04% and Non-Major bleeds 15/2342=0.6%. Transfusion: One hundred and fourteen patients (5%) received blood transfusions. Transfusion rates by procedure: unilateral THA 4%, Bilateral THA 40%, RTHA 27, unilateral PTKA 3%, bilateral TKA 16%,unicompartmental knee 0% and revision TKA 6%. No routine blood salvage or drains used for primary arthroplasties. Conclusions: The incidence of thromboembolic events within a period of 3 months was 12/2342=0.6% for DVT and 16/2342=0.7% for PE. The incidence of major bleeding was 0.04%. There were no deaths related to DVT, PE or bleeding. Preliminary results are surprising for the number of pulmonary emboli which occurred while patients were still in hospital and for the number of DVT's which occurred between 6 weeks and 3 months. The early PE's tended to occur in primary TKA. The late events tended to occur in primary THA and TKA. Disclosures: Murnaghan: Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: rivaroxaban is used for thromboprophylaxis after total joint replacement. our protocol gives first dose on day after surgery. Gollish:Bayer Healthcare: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Clinical Impact and Course of Anticoagulant-Related Major Bleeding in Cancer Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (01) ◽  
pp. 174-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noémie Kraaijpoel ◽  
Nick van Es ◽  
Suzanne Bleker ◽  
Marjolein Brekelmans ◽  
Elise Eerenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Major Bleeding Events

AbstractCancer patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) have a two- to six-fold increased risk of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events compared with VTE patients without cancer. It is unknown whether major bleeding events are more severe in cancer patients than in those without cancer. Individual patient data from four randomized phase III trials that compared factor Xa inhibitors and vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of VTE were used to compare the severity of major bleeding events in patients with and without cancer. Using predefined criteria, the severity of the clinical presentation and course of major bleeding events were classified into four categories of increasing severity. A one-stage meta-analysis was used to evaluate the effect of cancer on the severity of the clinical presentation and course by estimating crude odds ratios (ORs) and ORs adjusted for age, sex and anticoagulant type with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study group comprised 290 patients with major bleeding, of whom 50 (17%) had cancer. The clinical presentation was judged to be severe (category 3 or 4) in 38% of patients with cancer and 44% of patients without cancer (adjusted OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.47–1.72). The clinical course was found to be severe in 20 and 25% of patients with and without cancer, respectively (adjusted OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35–1.61). The present study suggests that the clinical presentation and course of anticoagulant-related major bleeding events are not more severe in cancer patients than in patients without cancer. This may be reassuring for physicians who treat cancer patients with anticoagulant-related bleeding.

scholarly journals Factor Xa inhibitor for venous thromboembolism management in patient with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1257
Author(s):  
Johanes Nugroho Eko Putranto ◽  
Ardyan Wardhana ◽  
Yoga Alfian Noor ◽  
Pirhot Lambok Marnala Yosua Siahaan ◽  
Makhyan Jibril Al Farabi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitor ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Background: An earlier systematic review reported no differences in the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding between factor Xa inhibitors and standard anticoagulation. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of factor Xa inhibitors for the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE), specifically in patients with cancer, as there were more randomized clinical trials (RCTs) available. Methods: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were systematically screened for all RCTs assessing factor Xa inhibitor efficacy for VTE management in cancer patients. Using RevMan 5.3, we performed a Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects meta-analysis of the following outcomes: recurrent VTE, VTE events, and major bleeding rates. Results: We identified 11 studies involving 7,965 patients. Factor Xa inhibitors were superior in preventing VTE recurrence, compared to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45–0.80; P < 0.01) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33–0.78; P < 0.01). As prophylaxis, factor Xa inhibitors had a similar rate of VTE compared to VKAs (OR 1.08 [95% CI 0.31–3.77]; P = 0.90) and a lower rate compared to placebo (OR 0.54 [95% CI 0.35–0.81]; P < 0.01). Major bleeding rates were higher with factor Xa inhibitors than with LMWHs (OR 1.34 [95% CI 0.83–2.18]; P = 0.23), but significantly lower than VKAs (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.55–0.92]; P < 0.01). Conclusions: Factor Xa inhibitors are effective for VTE management in patients with cancer; however, they are also associated with an increased bleeding risk compared to LMWH, but decreased when compared to VKA.

scholarly journals Restart of Anticoagulant Therapy and Risk of Thrombosis, Rebleeding, and Death after Factor Xa Inhibitor Reversal in Major Bleeding Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Truman J. Milling ◽  
Ben King ◽  
Patrick Yue ◽  
Saskia Middeldorp ◽  
Jan Beyer-Westendorf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitor ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Lack of data on balancing bleeding and thrombosis risk causes uncertainty about restarting anticoagulants after major bleeding. Anticoagulant reversal trials offer prospectively gathered data after major bleeding with well-documented safety events and restarting behavior. Objectives To examine the relationship of restarting anticoagulation with thrombosis, rebleeding, and death. Methods This is a posthoc analysis of a prospective factor Xa inhibitor reversal study at 63 centers in North America and Europe. We compared outcomes of restarted patients with those not restarted using landmark and time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. Outcomes included thrombotic and bleeding events and death and a composite of all three. Results Of 352 patients enrolled, oral anticoagulation was restarted in 100 (28%) during 30-day follow-up. Thirty-four (9.7%) had thrombotic events, 15 (4.3%) had bleeding events (after day 3), and 49 (14%) died. In the landmark analysis comparing patients restarted within 14 days to those not, restarting was associated with decreased thrombotic events (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.112; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001–0.944; p = 0.043) and increased rebleeding (HR = 8.39; 95% CI: 1.13–62.29; p = 0.037). The time-dependent Cox model showed evidence for a reduction in a composite (thrombotic events, bleeding, and death) attempting to capture net benefit (HR = 0.384; 95% CI: 0.161–0.915; p = 0.031). Conclusion This analysis provides modest evidence that restarting anticoagulation in factor Xa inhibitor-associated major bleeding patients is correlated with reduced risk of thrombotic events and increased risk of rebleeding. There is low-level evidence of net benefit for restarting. A randomized trial of restarting would be appropriate.

scholarly journals Tinzaparin in Cancer and Renal Impairment: A Systematic Review Focusing on Safety

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Vathiotis ◽  
Nikolaos Syrigos ◽  
Evangelos Dimakakos
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Renal Impairment ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Severe Renal Impairment ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Therapeutic Doses

Abstract Purpose: Low-molecular-weight heparins are approved for primary and secondary venous thromboembolism prevention. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an update regarding the safety profile of tinzaparin sodium, prescribed either as a prophylactic or as a therapeutic regimen for VTE in cancer patients and individuals suffering from renal impairment. Method: We identified and studied clinical studies from 2000 until 2020, reporting safety outcomes for cancer patients and individuals with renal impairment receiving either prophylactic or therapeutic doses of tinzaparin. Results: In patients with cancer major bleeding rates fluctuate between 0.8% and 7%; reported major bleeding rates for non-cancer patients with renal impairment on prophylactic tinzaparin regimens were 0%. Non-cancer patients on therapeutic tinzaparin regimens exhibited major bleeding in 0 to 2.3% of cases; major bleeding rates were higher for cancer patients with renal impairment receiving therapeutic doses of tinzaparin (4.3 to 10%). Patients on tinzaparin exhibit significantly lower rates of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events in comparison with those on vitamin K antagonists. Bioaccumulation of tinzaparin is not correlated with age, body weight or creatinine clearance. Periodic administration of either prophylactic or therapeutic doses of tinzaparin does not result in bioaccumulation, even in patients with severe renal impairment and creatinine clearance < 20 ml/min. Conclusion: Tinzaparin is safe and can be used without dose adjustment in patients with severe renal impairment and creatinine clearance > 20 ml/min. Tinzaparin represents a thoroughly studied and safe choice for special populations at increased risk for thrombosis and bleeding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document