scholarly journals Blast MRD AML-1 Trial: Blockade of PD-1 Added to Standard Therapy to Target Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) 1- an Investigator-Initiated, CTEP-Sponsored, Randomized Phase 2 Study of the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Pembrolizumab in Combination with Conventional Intensive Chemotherapy (IC) As Frontline Therapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 15-15
Author(s):  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
Prajwal C Boddu ◽  
Brent L Wood ◽  
Daniel Zelterman ◽  
Richard F. Little ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Study Background: The presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after IC in AML patients is often a harbinger of relapse, and therapeutic targeting of MRD has emerged as an important strategy to improve long-term outcomes. The importance of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in immune evasion of AML has been demonstrated in murine AML models whereby PD-L1 and PD-1 were upregulated in leukemia cells, and PD-1 blockade suppresses invivo leukemia cell proliferation and improved survival in AML bearing mice (Zhang et al., 2009; Zhou et al., 2010). Combining IC with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICPI) has resulted in a significant clinical activity in some advanced solid malignancies including non-small-cell lung cancer. A recent single-arm phase 2 study combining IC with nivolumab showed the combination was feasible and resulted in undetectable MRD in 53% of patients with Complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (Ravandi et al, 2019). Here we report on the design of the first randomized multi-center clinical trial of IC+ICPI in fit AML patients. Methods: The primary objective of this investigator-initiated Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP)-sponsored multi-institutional, randomized phase II study (NCT04214249) is to assess the percentage of patients with MRD negative CR (MRD- CR) as measured by flow cytometry at the end of first cycle of consolidation therapy with IC+ pembrolizumab and compare between the two study arms (Figure 1). Secondary objectives include rates of CR/CRi, complete remission with partial recovery count (CRh) and hematologic improvement (HI) to red blood cells and platelets, MRD negativity at Day 14, MRD-negative CR at end of induction therapy and MRD negative CR after last consolidation cycle, event free survival (EFS), relapse free survival (RFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS), and proportion of patients who develop severe toxicity. Important exploratory objectives include MRD assessment by duplex sequencing (DS) and comparing DS and multiparameter flow cytometry for MRD detection. The study will consist of an induction, consolidation, and maintenance phase of therapy. A total of 124 patients will be included (62 patients in the intervention arm and 62 patients in the control arm). Planned stratification factors include 1) age (younger than 65 vs. 65 and older), 2) cytogenetics by FISH or metaphase karyotype (presence vs. absence of core binding factor inversions and translocations), and 3) t-AML or AML arising from prior/antecedent MDS. All patients will receive cytarabine at 100 mg/m2/day continuous infusion on Days 1-7 and either idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day IV on Days 1-3 or daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day IV on Days 1-3. on Day 8 of the induction chemotherapy, half of the patients will receive pembrolizumab IV (intervention arm), and continue Q3 weeks throughout Induction/Consolidation, and thereafter for up to 2 years from the start of maintenance. The other half will not receive pembrolizumab (control arm). After 31 efficacy-evaluable patients (patients who had a bone marrow biopsy done after the first consolidation cycle) in each of the two study arms have had their primary endpoint results available, a formal futility and toxicity analysis will be conducted. Follow up will continue up to 2 years after the last patient is randomized. Eligible patients are aged ≥18 and ≤75 years with newly diagnosed and pathologically-confirmed AML, including secondary AML arising from prior MDS and therapy-related AML. Patients with FLT3-mutated AML are excluded as well as those with prior allogeneic stem cell transplant, active infection requiring systemic therapy, and requiring use of high dose corticosteroids. Responses in AML patients will be assessed using European Leukemia Net 2017 response criteria. EFS will be calculated as the time from initial treatment to either disease relapse or death. OS will be calculated from time from initial treatment to death. Biomarker analyses will include an extensive array of immunologic and correlative studies that will evaluate PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, immune cell subset analysis, leukemia specific T-cell response, cytokine level, T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire, as well as RNA-seq, gut microbiome characterization and metabolomics, and whole exome sequencing for tumor and germline DNA. Figure 1 Disclosures Zeidan: Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene / BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeyondSpring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; MedImmune/Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho: Consultancy, Honoraria; CCITLA: Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Radich:Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Prospective Phase 2 Study of Venetoclax and Low Dose Ara-C (VALDAC) to Target Rising Molecular Measurable Residual Disease and Early Relapse in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1261-1261
Author(s):  
Ing S Tiong ◽  
Sun Loo ◽  
Emad Uddin Abro ◽  
Devendra Hiwase ◽  
Shaun Fleming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Early Relapse ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Measurable Residual Disease ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction Rising molecular measurable residual disease (MRD) is an arbiter of clinical relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax (VEN) is active against IDH and NPM1 mutant (mt) AML as monotherapy (Konopleva et al, 2016 and Chua et al, 2020) and can yield MRD negative remission when combined with low dose ara-C (LDAC) in patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy (DiNardo and Tiong et al, 2020). In a retrospective study, we showed that VEN in combination with hypomethylating agents or LDAC could erase rising NPM1mt MRD in 6/7 cases (Tiong et al, 2020). We now present a prospective phase 2 study of VEN and LDAC in patients with molecular MRD failure or oligoblastic AML relapse. Methods This multicenter phase 2 study stratified patients into oligoblastic relapse (marrow blasts 5-15%; Group A), or molecular MRD failure (Group B) as defined by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations (failure confirmed by 2 interval samples) (Schuurhuis et al, 2018). Patients received VEN 600 mg (days 1-28) and LDAC 20 mg/m 2 (days 1-10). Primary objectives were morphologic or MRD response (≥1 log reduction) in groups A and B, respectively. Key secondary objectives were allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) realization and relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The study had Alfred Health ethics approval (196/19). NPM1mt and other fusion transcript levels (per 10 5 ABL) from bone marrow were analyzed by RT-qPCR, IDH1 and IDH2 by Bio-Rad TM droplet digital PCR. Results The study enrolled 32 patients, with 29 evaluable (cut-off date 15/7/21). The median age of the study population was 62 years; 79% had intermediate cytogenetic risk, 66% NPM1mt, 11% FLT3-ITD and 37% IDH1/IDH2 mt. Most received prior intensive chemotherapy (93%) and 2 (7%) allo-HCT in first remission. Median interval from AML diagnosis to study entry was 12.6 months (Table 1). After a median follow-up of 7.9 months, patients had received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-14) of VEN-LDAC, with 13 patients ongoing. The main reasons for treatment cessation were allo-HCT (n=10; 34%) or donor lymphocyte infusion (n=2; 7%), treatment failure (n=3) or an adverse event (n=1). Hematologic complete/incomplete response (CR/CRi) among 11 patients with oligoblastic relapse (group A) was 73% and included: CR (n=5, 45%) or CRi (n=3, 27%), with an additional patient with morphologic leukemia-free state and 2 patients with stable disease. Overall, across both groups, median RFS and OS were not reached, estimated at 78% and 91% at 1 year, respectively. Among 18 patients with molecular MRD failure (group B) treated with VEN+LDAC, molecular response (≥1 log reduction) was achieved in 72%, and the RFS and OS were estimated at 83% and 87% at 1 year, respectively. Analysis of a sub-group of patients with NPM1mt (n=18); 6 and 12 from Groups A and B, respectively revealed the median NPM1mt transcript level at study entry to be 8985 copies (IQR 826, 94,431). A molecular response was achieved in 14 (78%) patients, including 9 (50%) with complete molecular remission (CR MRD-), with most responses achieved within 2 cycles of therapy (Figure B). Treatment with VEN-LDAC was generally well tolerated, with 15 serious adverse events reported within the first 2 cycles, including infection (n=6; 19%) and febrile neutropenia (n=3; 9%). Only one subject discontinued treatment due to stroke. Conclusions In this prospective study, in patients with first oligoblastic relapse or MRD failure, VEN in combination with LDAC induced a high rate of molecular MRD remission that was rapidly achieved, resulting in a high rate of survival at 12-months (>90%) and with low toxicity. Follow-up is ongoing to determine the durability of response. Treatment of patients with MRD or early clinical failure may represent an attractive clinical trial setting for investigation of novel, non-intensive AML therapies. This approach will be investigated in a future multi-arm, precision-based platform trial called INTERCEPT (Investigating Novel Therapy to Target Early Relapse and Clonal Evolution as Pre-emptive Therapy in AML). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tiong: Servier: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Hiwase: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fleming: Amgen Inc: Research Funding. Bajel: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer: Honoraria. Fong: Amgen, BMS: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; AbbVie, Amgen, Novartis, Pfizer, Astellas: Honoraria. Wei: Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Macrogenics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: This presentation will discuss the use of venetoclax in targeting measurable residual disease and early relapse of acute myeloid leukemia.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Transplant Can Abrogate the Relapse Risk in the Patients with Detectable Measureable Residual Disease By Multicolor Flow-Cytometry at the Time of Assessment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in First Remission

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Muhned Alhumaid ◽  
Georgina S. Daher-Reyes ◽  
Arjun Law ◽  
Auro Viswabandya ◽  
Armin Gerbitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Relapse Risk ◽  
Acute Myeloid

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a highly heterogeneous group of diseases with variable response to therapy. Several factors have a prognostic impact for an outcome. Despite intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT), a significant proportion of patients eventually relapse, indicating that morphological assessment is not adequate due to limitations in sensitivity, requiring a better tool for assessment of remission. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in AML patients who achieved first complete remission (CR1) and the outcomes compared according to the performance of HCT, and multi-color flow cytometry (MFC)-based measurable residual disease (MRD) status (defined as negative if patients achieved 0.1% or less) assessed at the time of CR1. In order to take account of the time interval from the MFC-MRD assessment to HCT, we applied a Mantel-Byar test for overall (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS), considering time-to-HCT as a time-dependent covariate, while Simon and Makuch plot was used. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models were applied for multivariate analysis. Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) where evaluated using Fine-Gray model. RESULTS: A total of 435 patients diagnosed with AML and treated with induction chemotherapy between 2015 and 2018, of whom 380 patients (87%) achieved remission, were included. MFC-MRD was assessed in 336 patients in CR1 (77%), out of 380 patients who achieved CR1, and 200 patients (53%) proceeded to HCT. We evaluated OS, RFS, CIR and NRM according to MFC-MRD status in those patients who had negative MRD (MRDneg; n=218, 65%) vs. those with MRD (MRDpos; n=118, 35%). The OS at 2 years was 67.0% vs.40.7% (p≤0.001), RFS at 2 years was 8.7% vs. 40.6% (p≤0.001), CIR 26.9% vs.21.1% but with borderline significance (p=0.08), and NRM 32.5% vs. 20.2% with borderline significance (p=0.057). In patients who achieved CR, we compared OS, CIR, NRM and RFS between the HCT group (n=200) vs. those who did not undergo HCT (no-HCT; n=235). Between the 2 groups, the OS at 2 years was 55.7% vs. 47.2% (p=0.004); CIR 9.7% vs. 34.6% (p≤0.001); NRM 40.9% vs. 12.6% (p≤0.001). There was no difference in RFS: 49.4% vs. 52.8% (p=0.505). There was no difference in the time interval from the MFC-MRD assessment to HCT between the groups (MRDpos vs MRDneg) with a median of 96 days in overall patients who received HCT (p=0.31). In the overall population, when HCT was accounted as a time-dependent covariate, we failed to observe any difference of OS (HR 1.23; p=0.19) or RFS (HR 1.09; p=0.60) between the HCT vs. no-HCT groups. Then, we compared the OS, RFS, CIR, and NRM between the HCT vs no-HCT groups confined to the subgroups of patients with MFC-MRDneg vs MFC-MRDpos, separately. In the MFC-MRDpos subgroup, patients who underwent HCT did better: OS 54.8% in HCT vs. 25.5% in no-HCT (HR 0.52; p≤0.001) and RFS 48.7% vs. 24.1% (HR 0.45; p≤0.001). However, in the MFC-MRDneg subgroup, similar outcomes were noted between the HCT vs no-HCT groups in terms of OS 60.8% vs. 70.7% (HR 1.27, p=0.32), RFS 51.6% vs. 62.4% (HR 1.25; p=0.46) (Fig 1). With respect to the cause of treatment failure according to treatment modality (HCT vs no-HCT) and MFC-MRD status, Fig 2 revealed different patterns of relapse vs NRM between the HCT and the no-HCT groups. In the MFC-MRDneg subgroup, HCT group showed a higher NRM over the no-HCT group (38.0% vs 8.7%; HR 2.08; p≤0.001), while relapse risk was lower in the HCT group (10.4% vs 29.3%; p≤0.001). In the MFC-MRDpos subgroup, relapse incidence was strikingly different in favor of HCT (9.5% vs 50.0%; HR, p≤0.001). Conclusion: These findings suggest that in AML patients HCT could abrogate the relapse risk in patients who are MFC-MRDpos at the time of remission assessment, while the benefit from HCT was minimal in the subgroup that are MFC-MRDneg. Further study is strongly warranted to reach a clearer conclusion with a larger number of cohorts. Disclosures Lipton: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Survival Analysis According to Minimal Residual Disease By Flow Cytometry in Acute Myeloid Leukemia after First Induction

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1433-1433
Author(s):  
Claudia Nunez-Torron ◽  
Juan Marquet Palomanes ◽  
Fernando Martín Moro ◽  
Adolfo Saez-Martin ◽  
Alejandro Luna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Cytogenetic and molecular landscape at diagnosis and the depth of response to induction therapy are the most powerful prognostic tools available in patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Among the tests to measure Minimal Residual Disease (MRD), one of the most commonly used is flow cytometry. Nowadays, there is no consensus about optimal time for measurement and the threshold above which has greater prognostic value in AML, as well as its involvement in therapeutic management. Material and methods: We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 62 patients diagnosed with AML between 2015 and 2019 that reached complete remission after first induction. Patients were stratified according to the European Leukemia Net (ELN) risk classification. MRD measurement was made in bone marrow samples with an 8-color flow cytometer (sensitivity 10-5), cut-off 0.1%. We divided our cohort in two groups according to MRD after induction: negative MRD (MRD-) and positive MRD (MRD+). The baseline characteristics of each group were compared using the Chi2 test. The survival analysis was performed through Kaplan-Meier method and the risk was calculated with Cox regression. The Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the period of time from diagnosis to death and the leukemia-free state (LFS) as the period of time from CR to either relapse or death. Statistical analysis were carried out using SPSS version 19.0. P<0.05 was defined as statistically significant difference. Results: Baseline characteristics of the sample are represented in Table 1. The median follow-up was 15 months (1-45). The 3-year LFS for MRD- and MRD+ was 50% and 29% respectively (figure 1A) showing a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.02 (CI 95% 0.98-4.6, p=0.05). The 3-year OS was 50% and 36% for MRD- and MRD+ respectively (figure 1B) and HR was 1.3 (CI 95% 0.6-2.8, p=0.4). In MRD+ group according to ELN risk classification, the 3-year LFS was 100% vs 21% vs 19% for favorable, intermediate and adverse risk, respectively (p=0.01) with a HR of 2.1 (CI 95% 1.1-3.9, p=0.01) in the univariate analysis. The 3-year OS was 100% vs 24% vs 18% for each subgroup (p=0.03) with a HR of 2.1 (CI 95% 1.06-4.4, p= 0.03). Thirty-eight patients received consolidation with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and MRD prior to HSCT was measured in 32 of 38, being positive in 10 patients. All cases with MRD+ before HSCT belonged to MRD+ after induction group (10/20) (p=0.03). In MRD+ group, the 3-year LFS was 36% among those who received HSCT vs 18% in those who did not (log rank p=0.02, HR 3.1 CI 95% 1.3-7.8 p=0.01). Conclusions: The persistence of MRD > 0.1% after first induction by flow cytometry has shown in our population the identification of a AML subgroup of high risk, specially relevant in the intermediate risk group of ELN classification. MRD+ leads to higher risk of relapse, and these patients benefit from more aggressive therapeutic strategies, including allogeneic HSCT. However, MRD+ group has more risk of MRD persistence prior to HSCT, the last being a knowing factor of relapse after allogeneic HSCT, what would justify more aggressive strategies after HSCT in these patients. Disclosures Piris-Villaespesa: Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Boards. García Gutiérrez:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Persistence of Minimal Residual Disease Assessed By Multi-Parameter Flow Cytometry Is a Strong Predictor of Outcome in Younger Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2579-2579
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jorgensen L Jeffrey ◽  
Elias J Jabbour ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Tapan Kadia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Post Induction ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background - Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) assessed by Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry (MFC) has not been extensively evaluated as a predictor of outcome in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving ara-C plus anthracycline induction Methods - We examined the predictive value of MRD assessment by MFC in mainly younger patients with newly diagnosed AML who were treated with intermediate dose cytarabine (total of ≥ 6 g/m2) and idarubicin based induction chemotherapy. Among 280 patients treated with clofarabine, idarubicin plus ara-C (CIA), fludarabine, idarubicin plus ara-C (FIA), fludarabine, ara-C, GCSF plus idarubicin (FLAG-Ida), cladribine, idarubicin, plus ara-C (CLIA) who achieved complete remission (CR), CR without platelet recovery (CRp), or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) 186 had at least one available MRD data and are the subject of this analysis. MRD by MFC was assessed using an 8-color panel containing 19 distinct markers, on bone marrow specimens obtained at the time of achievement of CR/CRi/CRp (approximately 1-2 months post induction), during consolidation (approximately 3-7 months post-induction) and at completion of therapy (≥ 8 months post induction). Residual leukemic blasts were identified based on phenotypic differences from normal myelomonocytic precursors. Sensitivity was estimated at 0.1% in most cases, with maximum achievable sensitivity of 0.01%, depending on the leukemic phenotype. Results - Median age of the patients was 51 years (Range, 17 - 77 years). 6 patients were older than 65 (all with ELN favorable disease). Median WBC at presentation was 4.7 x 109/L (Range, 0.5 - 103 x 109/L). Cytogenetics was favorable risk in 34 (18%), intermediate risk in 115 (62%) and adverse in 27 (15%) and was not available in 10 (5%) Treatment included CIA in 102 (55%), FIA in 34 (18%), FLAG-Ida in 34 (18%) and CLIA in 16 (9%). 166 patients had available samples at 1-2 months post induction and 131 (79%) became MRD negative. Achieving MRD negative status at response was associated with a statistically significant improvement in relapse free survival (RFS) (p= 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p= 0.003) (Figure 1). 116 patients were evaluated for MRD status during consolidation and 100 (86%) became negative. Achieving a negative MRD status during consolidation was associated with a significant improvement in RFS (p˂0.001) and OS (p˂0.001)(Figure 2). 69 patients were evaluated for MRD status after completion of all therapy and 58 (84%) became negative. Achieving a negative MRD status at completion of therapy was associated with improvement in RFS (P˂0.001) and OS (P˂0.001) (Figure 3). On multivariate analysis including age ˂40 years vs. ≥ 40, WBC at presentation ˂or ≥ 10 x 109/L, cytogenetics (favorable, intermediate, adverse), achieving CR vs. CRp/CRi, and treatment with CIA, FIA, CLIA, or FLAG-Ida, achieving MRD negative status was the only independent predictor of RFS and OS at response (P=0.03 and P=0.005, respectively), during consolidation (p˂0.001 for both), or at completion of therapy (p˂0.001 for both). Conclusion - Achieving MRD negative status by MFC at response, during consolidation therapy and after completion of therapy is associated with a highly significant improvement in the outcome of younger patients with AML receiving ara-C plus idarubicin-based regimens. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures Jabbour: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Faderl:Astellas: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; JW Pharma: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Ambit: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria. Konopleva:Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Stemline: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Threshold: Research Funding. Cortes:BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Residual disease detected by multidimensional flow cytometry signifies high relapse risk in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a report from Children's Oncology Group

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (8) ◽  
pp. 1581-1588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Loken ◽  
Todd A. Alonzo ◽  
Laura Pardo ◽  
Robert B. Gerbing ◽  
Susana C. Raimondi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Relapse Risk ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Early response to induction chemotherapy is a predictor of outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We determined the prevalence and significance of postinduction residual disease (RD) by multidimensional flow cytometry (MDF) in children treated on Children's Oncology Group AML protocol AAML03P1. Postinduction marrow specimens at the end of induction (EOI) 1 or 2 or at the end of therapy from 249 patients were prospectively evaluated by MDF for RD, and presence of RD was correlated with disease characteristics and clinical outcome. Of the 188 patients in morphologic complete remission at EOI1, 46 (24%) had MDF-detectable disease. Those with and without RD at the EOI1 had a 3-year relapse risk of 60% and 29%, respectively (P < .001); the corresponding relapse-free survival was 30% and 65% (P < .001). Presence of RD at the EOI2 and end of therapy was similarly predictive of poor outcome. RD was detected in 28% of standard-risk patients in complete remission and was highly associated with poor relapse-free survival (P = .008). In a multivariate analysis, including cytogenetic and molecular risk factors, RD was an independent predictor of relapse (P < .001). MDF identifies patients at risk of relapse and poor outcome and can be incorporated into clinical trials for risk-based therapy allocation. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00070174.

scholarly journals Increased Idarubicin Dosage during Consolidation Therapy for Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Improves Leukemia-Free Survival

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 338-338
Author(s):  
Bradstock Kenneth ◽  
Emma Link ◽  
Juliana Di Iulio ◽  
Jeff Szer ◽  
Paula Marlton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Anthracylines are one of the major classes of drugs active against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Increased doses of daunorubicin during induction therapy for AML have been shown to improve remission rates and survival. The ALLG used idarubicin in induction therapy at a dose of 9 mg/m2 x 3 days (total dose 27 mg/m2) in combination with high-dose cytarabine and etoposide (Blood 2005, 105:481), but showed that a total idarubicin dose of 36 mg/m2 was too toxic in this context (Leukemia 2001, 15:1331). In order to further improve outcomes in adult AML by anthracycline dose escalation, we conducted a phase 3 trial comparing standard to an increased idarubicin dose during consolidation therapy. Methods: Patients achieving complete remission after 1 or 2 cycles of intensive induction therapy (idarubicin 9 mg/m2 daily x3, cytarabine 3 g/m2 twice daily on days 1,3,5 and 7, and etoposide 75 mg/m2 daily x7; ICE protocol) were randomized to receive 2 cycles of consolidation therapy with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days, etoposide 75 mg/m2 for 5 days, and idarubicin 9mg/m2 daily for either 2 or 3 days (standard and intensive arms respectively). No further protocol therapy was given. The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival from randomization to consolidation therapy (LFS) with overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 422 patients with AML (excluding cases with CBF rearrangements or APL) aged 16 to 60 years were enrolled between 2003-10, with 345 (82%) achieving complete remission, and 293 being randomized to standard (n=146) or intensive (n=147) consolidation arms. The median age was 45 years in both arms (range 16- 60), and both groups were balanced for intermediate versus unfavorable karyotypes and for frequency of mutations involving FLT3-ITD and NPM1 genes. Of the randomized patients, 120 in the standard arm (82%) and 95 in the intensive arm (65%) received the second consolidation cycle (p<0.001). The median total dose of idarubicin received in the 2 consolidation courses was 36 mg/m2 (range 17-45), or 99% (47-125%) of the protocol dose in the standard arm, versus 53 mg/m2 (18-73), or 98% (33-136%) of the protocol dose in the intensive arm. The durations of grades 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly longer in the intensive arm, but there were no differences in grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities. There were no non-relapse deaths during consolidation on the standard arm and 2 in the intensive (0% vs 1%; p =0.50). Subsequently, 41 patients in the standard arm and 37 in the intensive arm underwent elective allogeneic BMT during first remission. On intention to-treat analysis uncensored for transplant and with a median follow-up time of 5.3 years (range 0.6 - 9.9), there was improvement in LFS in the intensive arm compared with the standard arm (3 year LFS 47% (95% CI 40-56%) versus 35% (28-44%); HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.55-0.99); p=0.045) (Figure 1). The 3 year OS for the intensive arm was 61% (95% CI 54-70%) and 50% (95% CI 43-59%) for the standard arm; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.54-1.05); p=0.092). Although adverse cytogenetics, presence of FLT3-ITD mutation, and absence of NPM1 mutation were all associated with poorer outcomes, there was no evidence of a benefit of intensive consolidation being confined to specific cytogenetic or gene mutation sub-groups. Conclusion: We conclude that in adult patients in complete remission after intensive induction chemotherapy an increased dose of idarubicin delivered during consolidation therapy results in improved LFS, without increased non-hematologic toxicity. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Szer: Ra Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marlton:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wei:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cartwright:ROCHE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roberts:Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Mills:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship. Gill:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document