scholarly journals A Phase 1, Dose-Escalation Study of Gilteritinib Combined with Chemotherapy in Patients Aged 6 Months to <21 Years with FLT3 Internal Tandem Duplication-Positive Relapsed or Refractory AML

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2315-2315
Author(s):  
Philip Connor ◽  
Linyi Fan ◽  
Stanley Gill ◽  
Jason E. Hill ◽  
Nisha Philipose ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) accounts for ~18% of all childhood leukemias (Puumala SE, et al. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60(5):728-733). Gilteritinib, an oral FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy with favorable tolerability in clinical trials of adults with FLT3-mutated relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML, including internal tandem duplication (ITD) and tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations (Perl AE, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1728-1740), leading to approval for the treatment of adults with R/R AML in the United States and many other countries/regions. Since the clinical progression of FLT3 ITD AML appears to be similar in children and adults, it is expected that the clinical benefit of gilteritinib in pediatric patients with FLT3 ITD R/R AML should be similar to that demonstrated in adults. We describe an ongoing phase 1, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04240002) investigating the combination of gilteritinib with chemotherapy in children, adolescents, and young adults with FLT3 ITD R/R AML, which will inform the dose for the phase 2 dose-expansion portion of the study. Study Design and Methods : This phase 1 dose-escalation study will enroll patients 6 months to &lt;21 years of age with FLT3 ITD and/or TKD-mutated AML (determined using institutional assay). Key inclusion and exclusion criteria include patients who are in first or greater relapse or are refractory to induction therapy with no more than 1 attempt at remission induction and (a) fully recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior therapy, (b) have a Karnofsky (if ≥16 years) or Lansky (if &lt;16 years) score ≥50, and (c) been ≥90 days relapsed since hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with no active graft-versus-host disease, if relevant. Patients will undergo screening, including complete physical exam, subject-reported symptoms, and areas of disease (Figure). Patients will be enrolled in 1 of the 3 following groups: group 1 (2 to &lt;21 years), group 2 (1 to &lt;2 years), and group 3 (6 months to &lt;1 year). Gilteritinib will be administered once daily starting from day 8 through day 21 of a 28-day cycle at the starting dose of 2 mg/kg/day for Group 1 and 1 mg/kg/day for Groups 2 and 3, with escalation to 2 or 3 mg/kg/day (the latter to be evaluated only if there is lack of toxicity or acceptable dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] and lack of sufficient gilteritinib activity observed at 2 mg/kg/day). Patients in all groups will receive FLAG (fludarabine, 30 mg/m 2/day; cytarabine, 2000 mg/m 2/day; granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, 5 μg/kg/day) on days −1 to 5 and prophylactic single intrathecal cytarabine (age-adjusted dose). Patients who complete 2 cycles of treatment will have the option to participate in long-term treatment (LTT) with gilteritinib for ≤2 years. An end of treatment (EOT) visit will occur 7 days after the last dose of gilteritinib or before initiation of another anticancer therapy. A follow-up visit will be performed 28 days after the EOT visit in patients who are ineligible for LTT. Patients eligible for LTT will undergo a follow-up visit 28 days after the LTT EOT visit. Follow-up for survival will be performed every 3 months for ≤2 years from the 28-day follow-up visit. Study End Points : The primary end point is identification of the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended phase 2 dose based on the DLT observed in treatment cycle 1 and biologic activity according to plasma inhibitory activity (PIA). The secondary end points are inhibition of phosphorylated FLT3, gilteritinib pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, toxicity, event-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease assessment, and acceptability and palatability assessment of the formulation. The exploratory end points are correlation of clinical responses to gilteritinib with FLT3 PIA levels, correlation of FLT3 PIA levels and clinical responses to gilteritinib therapy with FLT3 ligand levels before and after exposure to FLAG chemotherapy, and mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance to gilteritinib. All data will be summarized with descriptive statistics for continuous end points and frequency/percentage for categorical end points. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Connor: Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding. Fan: Astellas Pharma Global Development: Current Employment. Gill: Astellas Pharma Global Development: Current Employment. Hill: Astellas Pharma Global Development: Current Employment; Ligacept, LLC: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Other: Stockholder. Philipose: Astellas Pharma Global Development: Current Employment. Delgado: Astellas Pharma Global Development: Current Employment. Tiu: Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Current Employment. Reinhardt: Abbvie: Other: Advisory board; Eusa: Other: Advisory board; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory board; BluebirdBio: Other: Advisory board; BMS: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; JAZZ: Other: Advisory board. OffLabel Disclosure: New Indication

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1587-1587
Author(s):  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Jason R. Westin ◽  
Jonathon B. Cohen ◽  
Luke P. Akard ◽  
Samantha Jaglowski ◽  
...  

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR707 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ signaling domain and a CD28 co-stimulatory domain. ACTR707 is in clinical development in combination with rituximab (NCT03189836) or trastuzumab (NCT03680560). Here we present clinical findings from the dose escalation phase of Study ATTCK-20-03, an ongoing, multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR707+rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The primary objectives of this first-in-human study are to evaluate the safety of the combination of ACTR707 and rituximab and to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Other objectives include evaluating antitumor activity and ACTR T-cell persistence. Subjects must have CD20+ NHL that is R/R after prior treatments, which must include anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR707. Additional doses of rituximab are administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study includes a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR707 with fixed dose of rituximab at 375 mg/m2 q3w) and an expansion phase at the RP2D. Results: Six subjects received ACTR707 at Dose Level 1 (DL1; 23-38×106 ACTR+ T cells), 3 subjects at DL2 (30-50×106 ACTR+ T cells), and 5 subjects at DL3 (45-55×106 ACTR+ T cells). The majority of the subjects were diagnosed with DLBCL (93%) and had refractory disease (71%), defined as progressive disease as the best response to any prior treatment or relapse &lt;1 year post autologous stem cell transplant. In DL1 through DL3, as of 27 May 2019, there were no dose-limiting toxicities, AEs of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), serious or severe neurologic AEs, or AEs leading to deaths on treatment. TEAEs reported in &gt;2 subjects, regardless of causality or grade, included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, cough, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. SAEs considered possibly related to ACTR707 were febrile neutropenia (n=2) and cytopenia (n=1). ACTR707 expansion generally reached peak levels within 1 to 2 weeks after administration. All subjects with complete response (CR) up to 1 year had detectable ACTR at the last timepoint evaluated. Higher ACTR707 CD8:CD4 T-cell ratios were associated with clinical responses. Clinical activity was reported across DL1 through DL3, with an overall response rate of 64% including durable complete responses (CRs), with one subject in CR for 387+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: Data available from DL1 through DL3 of ACTR707+rituximab suggest that clinical responses can be achieved without severe T cell-mediated toxicities (eg, CRS and neurotoxicity) that have been reported with other autologous T-cell products. Dose escalation continues at a target dose of 80×106 ACTR+ T cells; enrollment in DL4 (n=6) was recently completed. Updated data, including identified correlates of clinical outcomes, will be presented for DL1 through DL4. Disclosures Flinn: TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Cohen:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; UNUM: Research Funding; Hutchison: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Lymphoma Research Foundation: Research Funding; ASH: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Akard:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Bachanova:Celgene: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GT Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2502-2502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enriqueta Felip ◽  
Filippo G. De Braud ◽  
Michela Maur ◽  
Herbert H. F. Loong ◽  
Alice Tsang Shaw ◽  
...  

2502 Background: Induction of PD-L1 expression due to constitutive oncogenic signaling has been reported in NSCLC models harboring EML4–ALK rearrangements. Here we explore whether the combination of ALKi (ceritinib) and PD1-inhibitor (NIVO) will provide sustained clinical benefit to pts with ALK+ NSCLC. Methods: This phase 1 dose escalation study enrolled previously treated (ALK inhibitor [ALKi] or chemotherapy) or tx-naive pts with stage IIIB/IV ALK+ NSCLC; who received NIVO 3 mg/kg IV Q2W + ceritinib with low-fat meal, at 450 mg/day (group 1) or 300 mg/day (group 2) until progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary objective: MTD/recommended dose for expansion. Dose escalation was guided by Bayesian logistic regression model with overdose control. Results: Median follow-up: group 1 (n = 14) 13 mos (10-15); group 2 (n = 22) 6 mos (2-10). As of 9 Sep 2016, 16/36 (44%) pts discontinued tx: disease progression (11 [31%] pts), AE’s (3 [8%] pts), and death (2 [6%] pts). In group 1, 4 pts experienced DLT: pancreatitis (n = 2), lipase and transaminase increase (n = 1), and autoimmune hepatitis (n = 1). In group 2, 2 pts experienced DLT: G3 ALT increase. Both dose levels met Bayesian criteria for dose expansion. Overall most frequent (≥40%) AEs (n = 36), were diarrhea (64%), ALT increase (56%), AST increase (44%) and vomiting (42%). Most frequent ( > 10%) grade ≥3 AEs were increases in ALT (22%), GGT (17%), amylase (11%), and lipase (11%), and maculopapular rash (11%). Incidence of rash (grouped term) was 61%; similar in both groups. Grade 3 rash was reported in 29% pts in group 1 and 14% pts in group 2. Preliminary ceritinib steady state PK (AUC0-24 and Cmax) suggested that 300 mg/day exposure was ~ 70-75% of 450 mg/day. Confirmed (c)/unconfirmed (u) ORR: ALKi-pretreated pts (group 1 [n = 8], group 2 [n = 12]) was 63% (4 cPR,1 uPR; 95% CI: 25%, 92%), and 33% (4 uPR) 95% CI: 10%, 65%) respectively; ALKi-naïve pts, (group 1 [n = 6], group 2 [n = 10]) was 83% (5 cPR; 95% CI: 36%, 100%), and 70% (1 cCR, 3 cPR 3uPR; 95% CI: 35%, 93%) respectively. Conclusions: Ceritinib + NIVO is an active combination in ALK+ NSCLC. However, the protocol will be amended to address observed toxicities. Data will be updated for presentation. Clinical trial information: NCT02393625.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 203-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Savona ◽  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
Susan J Lee ◽  
Hansen Wong ◽  
Ju RueyJiuan Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 203 Background: Oprozomib (OPZ, formerly ONX 0912), a structural analog of carfilzomib (CFZ), is an orally bioavailable, next-generation proteasome inhibitor being evaluated in hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Similar to CFZ, OPZ is a potent, selective, and irreversible proteasome inhibitor. In an earlier dose-escalation study of once-daily (QD) OPZ in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 150 mg QD, leading to exploration of a split-dose schedule with the drug administered twice daily (BID). The present phase 1 study (NCT01416428) is evaluating OPZ administered using the split-dose schedule in patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods: This is an ongoing, phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation study of OPZ in patients with hematologic malignancies. The primary objectives are to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine the MTD. Secondary objectives of the study include pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. OPZ is administered PO on days 1–5 of a 14-day cycle using a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme. Treatment was initiated at 120 mg (60 mg BID), with an interval of 4–6 h between doses, with escalation in 30-mg increments in successive cohorts until MTD is determined. Tumor response is assessed by investigator. Results: As of June 15, 2012, 9 patients have been enrolled in the study, 3 in each of the 120-mg, 150-mg, and 180-mg dosing cohorts. No dose-limiting toxicities have been observed. Enrollment is ongoing at 210 mg/day. The median age of all patients is 67 years (range 53−81) and prior therapies included a median of 4 chemotherapy regimens (range 2−8). Patients have received a median of 5 cycles of treatment with OPZ, including 4 patients who have received ≥6 cycles. Dose reduction was required by only 1 patient in the 180-mg (90 mg BID) group for Grade 3 diarrhea and abdominal pain. Gastrointestinal (GI) AEs predominantly of Grade 1/2 in severity were the most common, with diarrhea and nausea each occurring in 7 patients, and vomiting occurring in 6 patients. The majority of GI AEs improved or resolved with concomitant medications. Thrombocytopenia was the only Grade 3/4 AE reported in more than 1 patient, occurring in 3 patients (1 at each dose level). Notably, no events of peripheral neuropathy were noted in patients in the first 3 dosing cohorts. AEs led to discontinuation in 2 patients at the 180-mg dose level, and no deaths have been reported. OPZ showed dose-dependent exposure across the 120- to 180-mg dose levels. Patients receiving split dosing had similar total exposure and lower Cmax than patients receiving QD dosing of the same total daily dose, although there was high inter-patient variability. Dose-dependent proteasome inhibition was observed in whole blood and increased from the first to the second of the split daily doses. Proteasome inhibition levels were similar to those achieved with single-dose equivalents and were >80% at the 180-mg dose level. Eight of 9 patients are evaluable for efficacy. There was preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity of ≥SD across all doses, including 1 patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who attained a PR after prior exposure to 3 lines of therapy, and 1 PR and 1 MR in patients with multiple myeloma. Conclusions: Oral OPZ was generally well tolerated using a split-dose schedule in this phase 1 trial in patients with hematologic malignancies. AEs were generally mild and manageable. An MTD has not been reached at cumulative doses up to 180 mg/d (90 mg BID). Dose-dependent proteasome inhibition was observed, with >80% inhibition at the highest dose tested. OPZ also demonstrated encouraging clinical activity across the first 3 dose levels in heavily pretreated patients. Dose escalation will continue until the MTD is reached, with planned phase 2 expansion at the MTD in patients with hematologic malignancies. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Oprozomib is in Phase 1 clinical trials for hematologic malignancies and is not approved by the FDA for any use. Lee:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wong:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Lee:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Gillenwater:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Siegel:Onyx: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharma: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.


Author(s):  
Charles C. Wykoff ◽  
Vrinda Hershberger ◽  
David Eichenbaum ◽  
Erin Henry ◽  
Husam S. Younis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document