scholarly journals Ponatinib in Combination with FLAG-IDA Chemotherapy for Blast-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Final Results of the Seamless Phase I/II Dose-Finding UK Trials Acceleration Programme (TAP) Matchpoint Trial

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
Mhairi Copland ◽  
Daniel Slade ◽  
Graham McIlroy ◽  
Gillian Horne ◽  
Jennifer Byrne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Blast Phase

Abstract Background Outcomes for patients with blast-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (BP-CML) are extremely poor, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) represents the only opportunity for cure. Crucially, long-term survival post-transplant depends on first attaining a return to chronic phase though salvage treatment. Novel strategies that improve response and can optimise transplant outcomes are therefore required. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), BP-CML has become an orphan disease. Consequently, the prospective trials needed to guide clinical practice are rarely attempted. We now report the final results of the prospective MATCHPOINT trial which uses an innovative EffTox design to investigate the activity and tolerability of the TKI ponatinib in combination with high-dose chemotherapy, to improve remission status and transplant outcomes in BP-CML. Methods and patients Between March 2015 and April 2018, 17 patients were recruited through the UK Trials Acceleration Programme to this dose-finding, seamless phase I/II trial of daily ponatinib combined with fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and idarubicin (PON-FLAG-IDA) salvage therapy. We employed EffTox, an advanced Bayesian method to simultaneously consider response to treatment (efficacy) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in all treated patients, providing a single measure of clinical utility, which then informed the subsequent dose level recommendation. The primary objective was to determine the optimal dose of ponatinib, in combination with chemotherapy, as determined by the EffTox model. The primary outcomes were attainment of a second chronic phase and occurrence of a DLT. Secondary outcomes investigated the toxicity of combination therapy, alloSCT outcomes, and survival. The median follow-up of trial patients is 41 months. Results Nine patients completed one cycle of PON-FLAG-IDA, a further eight patients completed both planned cycles. Using an EffTox analysis, the optimal dose of ponatinib was determined as 30mg once daily. Eleven patients achieved a return to chronic phase and four experienced a DLT, fulfilling the pre-specified criteria for clinically relevant efficacy and toxicity. After PON-FLAG-IDA salvage, eight patients attained complete cytogenetic response and five major molecular response (MMR). The most common grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities were febrile neutropenia (29% of patients), lung infection (24%), fever (18%) and hypocalcaemia (18%). Three patients experienced treatment-related mortality. Twelve patients proceeded to alloSCT, of whom seven are alive after median 36 months post-transplant follow-up. Only one of the five patients achieving MMR relapsed post-alloSCT, neither of the other relapsing patients achieved a second chronic phase pre-transplant. Median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 12 months (95% confidence interval 6 months to non-calculable), median OS of patients undergoing alloSCT has not been reached. Conclusions Ponatinib has shown that it can be safely combined with high-dose chemotherapy to achieve a return to chronic phase in patients with BP-CML, and represents an effective novel treatment strategy in this high-risk population. Responding patients subsequently undergoing alloSCT can benefit from long-term disease-free survival. The EffTox method enabled very efficient data usage from this high-risk patient population, and is a model for investigating novel therapies in other ultra-orphan cancers. Figure: Overall survival of the MATCHPOINT cohort Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Copland: Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cyclacel Ltd: Research Funding. Byrne: Incyte: Honoraria. Rothwell: Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Brock: Eli Lily: Honoraria; Invex Therapeutics: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; GSK: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. De Lavallade: Pfizer, Novartis.: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Craddock: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board ; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Clark: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria. Smith: Daiichi Sankyo: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Honoraria. Milojkovic: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Yap: Faron Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Ponatinib for the treatment of blast-phase CML

Seven-Year Follow-up Data on Sequential Prospective Trials of Imatinib 400mg Vs 800mg Daily Schedule for Front-Line Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3438-3438
Author(s):  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Annual Rate ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cumulative Rate ◽  
Prospective Trials

Abstract Abstract 3438 Background: The standard of care for most patients (pts) with CML has been imatinib mesylate at a dose of 400mg by mouth daily. Earlier studies have suggested that there may be a benefit to pts to start treatment at a higher dose as this may result in faster and more durable responses to imatinib. It is not yet known whether long-term event-free survival (EFS), transformation-free survival (TFS), and overall survival (OS) will be impacted by the higher dosing schedule. Objectives: To determine the long term responses and clinical benefit of imatinib 800mg daily versus 400mg daily dosing when used as upfront treatment strategy in CML. Methods: We conducted sequential prospective trials using imatinib 400mg or 800mg daily as initial therapy for patients with previously untreated chronic phase CML. Results: A total of 281 pts were included in these trials: 208 treated with 800mg and 73 with 400mg. The median follow-up for each group was 79 months (range: 3–107) and 110 months (range: 2–116). The overall, cumulative rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was 91% and 87%, respectively (p=0.49) for those treated with high- and standard-dose, and the cumulative rate of major molecular response (MMR) was 87% and 78%, respectively (p=0.06). Rates of CCyR at 12 months were 90% and 66%, respectively (p < 0.001), and MMR at 18 months 82% and 68%, respectively (p=0.04). A significantly better EFS (definition per IRIS criteria) was observed for the 800 mg group compared to that in the 400mg group (log-rank test, p=0.049; estimated 7-year EFS 86% vs 76% by Kaplan-Meier method). No significant differences were seen for survival free from transformation to accelerated and blast phase (p = 0.46) and overall survival (p = 0.27). For OS, thus far 19 pts in the 800mg group have died (2 probable CML-related, 3 unknown causes, 14 non CML related) compared to 13 pts (10 probable CML-related, 3 non CML-related) in the 400mg group. The table below shows the annual rate of events and transformation for each dose group. Treatment discontinuation for toxicity occurred in 16 (8%) pts treated with 800mg and 6 (8%) pts treated with 400mg. Conclusions: At 7-year follow up, pts treated with 800mg demonstrated a significantly better EFS (by IRIS criteria) compared to those treated with 400mg. There is a trend for a lower annual rate of events and transformation with the higher dose, particualry in the earlier years, but no difference in OS. These results suggest a modest benefit for patients treated with higher dose imatinib. Disclosures: Off Label Use: imatinib at dose of 800mg po daily for CML. Kantarjian:BMS, Pfizer and Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Ravandi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novarits: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Prolonged Overall Survival (OS) in a Subset of Responders to the Combination of Brentuximab Vedotin (Bv) and Bendamustine (B) in Heavily Treated Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL): Results of an International Multi- Center Phase I/II Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2907-2907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sawas ◽  
John Kuruvilla ◽  
Jennifer Kimberly Lue ◽  
Changchun Deng ◽  
Jennifer E Amengual ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Median Number ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Abstract Introduction Prognosis for patients who fail to respond to high-dose chemotherapy or progress after high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is particularly poor, with a recent study reporting 71% of patients dying in year 1 and 90% by year 2, with a median -progression survival of 1.3 years [1]. In our study of brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine (BvB) in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma, we recently reported an overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CR) of 71% and a 32% respectively (N=65) in a heavily treated patient population [2]. Having noted several patients with a progression free survival (PFS) of 1 year or longer, we reviewed all enrolled patients for protracted duration of benefit, raising the question as to whether these patients may have been cured by BvB in the salvage setting. (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01657331). Methods Among 65 enrolled patients we identified 23 with a PFS of more than one year after treatment with BvB. Patients had received Bv on Day 1 with B on Days 1 and 2 of a 3-week cycle for up to 6 cycles. In the Phase 1 study 4 dose levels were evaluated: (1) Bv = 1.2mg/kg; B = 70mg/m2; (2) Bv = 1.2mg/kg; B = 80mg/m2; (3) Bv = 1.8mg/kg; B = 80mg/m2; and (4) Bv = 1.8mg/kg; B = 90. Accrual followed a classic Fibonacci dose escalation, with 3 patients being treated at each dose level. Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT), defined as any CTC version 4 Grade 3 or 4 toxicity led to expansion of the dose cohort. The recommended phase II dose was Bv 1.8 mg/kg on Day 1 and B 90 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 2. The Phase 2 portion of the study accrued an additional 37 patients. Response was assessed by the investigator per Cheson 2007 after cycles 2 and 6. Patients were followed post completion of therapy every 3 month until disease progression and imaging was conducted every 3- 6 months. Study procedures and follow-up were concluded on June 30th 2018. In addition, plasma and serum biomarkers were prospectively collected for correlation with toxicity and response. Results With a median follow-up of 33 months (range 20-58 month) we identified 23/65 patients (43% male) with a median age of 34 years (range, 18-55) who experienced a PFS of 1 year or more. The median number of prior systemic therapies was 3 (range 1-6); with 11 patients having had prior ASCT and 10 patients receiving prior radiation therapy. Median number of BvB cycles administered was 4 (range 2-6). A best response of CR was documented for 17 patients (74%) and partial response (PR) was documented for 6 patients (26%). Consolidation with HDCT-ASCT was performed in 10 patients, 3 of whom received maintenance Bv post-transplant. The median duration of response (DOR), PFS and OS among this group was 28, 32 and 34 months, respectively. All responses are ongoing with no evidence of relapse. Long term survival with no further therapy after a median of 6 cycles of BvB ( range 2-6) was observed in 13 patients (20% of the treated population) (median post-BvB PFS 36 months, range 20-58). Exploratory analysis of the correlation between disease outcome and changes from baseline in select biomarkers demonstrated a significantly lower mean baseline sCD30 level among long term responders (p=0.01). No correlations were noted between other clinical outcome metrics and sCD30, nor with other biomarkers including TARC, CD163, or galectin. Conclusion In this heavily treated population with HL, the combination of BvB represents an effective and tolerable outpatient salvage regimen with long term response and protracted survival among a subset of patients, and raises the prospect that these patients, with a historically poor outcome may be cured with BvB. We intend to follow these patients to obtain additional information on their longer term outcome. ReferencesZagadailov, E.A., et al., Real-world effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin versus physicians' choice chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma following autologous stem cell transplantation in the United Kingdom and Germany. Leuk Lymphoma, 2018. 59(6): p. 1413-1419.O'Connor, O.A., et al., Brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2018. 19(2): p. 257-266. Disclosures Kuruvilla: Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Canada: Research Funding; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. O'Connor:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Phase I/II Study of Myeloablative Anti-CD20+ Radioimmunotherapy with I-131-Rituximab in High-Risk CD20-Positive Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3700-3700
Author(s):  
Kathleen Schwarz ◽  
Wagner Julia ◽  
Susanne Schreiber ◽  
Burkhard Schmidt ◽  
Alexander Hoellein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Abstract 3700 Background: Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has been successfully used to treat primary and relapsed/refractory CD20+ Non-Hodgkin-Lymphoma (NHL). Myeloablative anti-CD20 RIT allows delivering high radiation doses to lymphoma sites when followed by autologous stem cell infusion (autoSCT). However, RIT is infrequently used at present and long-term data is lacking. Patients, Design and Methods: 23 patients with relapsed/refractory CD20+ NHL who did not achieve a complete response to salvage chemotherapy were enrolled in this Phase I/II trial to evaluate RIT with 131I-labelled Rituximab (131I-R) in a myeloablative setting between January 2000 and October 2004. Biodistribution and dosimetry studies were performed in all patients to determine 131I activity required to induce a total body dose of 21 to 27 Gy to the critical organs lung and kidney. In 6/23 patients RIT was combined with high dose chemotherapy (HD-CTx) followed by autoSCT. 8/23 patients received a sequential HD-CTx with a second autoSCT. The median follow-up is 9.5 years. Results: 188–525 mCi 131I were delivered to achieve the limiting organ dose. No grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was seen with RIT alone. Significant grade 3/4 toxicity (mucositis, neutropenic fever, pneumonia, sepsis) including one therapy related death was observed in all patients treated with RIT combined with HD-CTx/autoSCT. The overall response rate was 87% (64% complete response rate). The median progression free (PFS) and overall survival are 47.5 and 101.5 months. After long-term follow up, 9 patients are progression free and 10 patients are alive. An elevated (>1) international prognostic index (IPI) was most predictive for overall survival. Conclusion: Myeloablative 131I-Rituximab RIT followed by autoSCT is feasible, well tolerated and effective in high risk CD20+ NHL and prolongs PFS compared to last standard chemotherapy. Patients additionally treated with high dose chemotherapy experienced significantly increased toxicity. Long-term results for progression free survival and overall survival in this trial are encouraging. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Long-term neuropsychological follow-up of young children with medulloblastoma treated with sequential high-dose chemotherapy and irradiation sparing approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taryn B. Fay-McClymont ◽  
Danielle M. Ploetz ◽  
Don Mabbott ◽  
Karin Walsh ◽  
Amy Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose

scholarly journals Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1589-1589
Author(s):  
Fabian Frontzek ◽  
Marita Ziepert ◽  
Maike Nickelsen ◽  
Bettina Altmann ◽  
Bertram Glass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Thirty-Five Year Follow-up Analysis of Follicular Lymphoma Patients Treated through the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group: Prognostic Factor Analysis and Outcomes

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Amulya Yellala ◽  
Elizabeth R. Lyden ◽  
Heather Nutsch ◽  
Avyakta Kallam ◽  
Kai Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Regimen ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Secondary Malignancies ◽  
Lymphoma Study Group

Background Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and most common of the clinically indolent NHLs. Although often considered an incurable disease, overall survival has increased significantly with refinement in diagnostic techniques and the addition of rituximab. The course of FL is quite variable and presence of symptoms, organ dysfunction, cytopenias, aggressiveness of tumor are all taken into consideration when deciding individual treatment. In this study, we evaluated a large patient cohort with FL treated over a 35 year period for progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) based on FLIPI score, tumor grade, and treatment regimen and also looked at causes of late failures. Methods We evaluated 1037 patients (pts) from the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group that were diagnosed with FL between the years of 1983-2020. Descriptive statistics were stratified according to age, histological subtype, treatment regimen, FLIPI category, presence and type of secondary malignancy. PFS was calculated from the time of diagnosis to progression or death and OS was the time from diagnosis to death from any cause. PFS and OS were plotted as Kaplan-Meier curves with statistically significant p&lt;0.05. Results The median age at diagnosis and treatment was 61 years (yrs, range 17-91). A total of 9.1% were characterized as FLIPI high risk, 37.8% intermediate risk, and 33.6% low risk, 19.5% unavailable. Among the histological grade, 23.1% had FL- grade 1, 30.2% FL-2, 27.3% FL-3A, 2.5 % FL-3B and 16.9 % Composite Lymphoma. Anthracycline + rituximab was given in 24.5% of pts, whereas 43.8% of pts received an anthracycline based regimen without rituximab, 9.8% received rituximab without an anthracycline and 10.6% received neither of these agents. 6.75% (70 pts) were later found to have secondary malignancies of which 11 pts had myelodysplastic syndrome, 10 pts had acute leukemia and 9 pts had lung cancer. With a median follow up of 9.2 yrs and a maximum of 36 yrs, 29.7% (308 pts) had not relapsed. The median PFS across all groups was 4.6 yrs (Fig 1) and OS was 12.1 yrs. Median OS was significantly longer in patients that received rituximab at 16.1 yrs as compared to patients that did not receive rituximab at 9.89 yrs (Fig 2). PFS was 8.6 yrs, 3.6 yrs and 2.1 yrs and OS was 15.1 yrs, 11.7 yrs and 4.9 yrs in FLIPI low, intermediate and high risk groups respectively (p=&lt;0.001) (Fig 3), suggesting that survival was influenced by FLIPI score. Median PFS in FL-3B and FL-3A was 9.2 yrs and 5.2 yrs respectively which is longer than 4.7 yrs and 4.2 yrs for FL-1 and FL-2 (p=0.24). OS in FL-3A and FL-3B subgroups was 10.8 yrs while it was 11.6 yrs and 14.3 yrs in FL-2 and FL-1 (P=0.081). PFS is significantly longer at 10.6 yrs in pts treated with both anthracycline and rituximab containing regimen as compared to 5.3 yrs in pts treated with rituximab alone and 3.05 yrs in pts that had only anthracycline based regimen (p=&lt;0.001) (Fig 4). The median OS also was significantly higher in the combination regimen group at 18.8 yrs as compared to 11.3 yrs in rituximab only group and 9 yrs in anthracycline based regimen group (p=&lt;0.001). When pts with FL-3A and FL-3B were grouped together and stratified according to treatment regimen, the group that received anthracycline and rituximab combination has highest PFS and OS at 13.3 yrs and 18.8 yrs (p&lt;0.001). when pts with FL-3A were analyzed separately and stratified by treatment regimen, the results of PFS and OS were similar and statistically significant. However, of the 24 pts in FL-3B group, analysis revealed that PFS and OS was longer in anthracycline based regimen only group, however results were not statistically significant. Among the pts that relapsed/died after 10 years (n=190), the cause of death was relapsed lymphoma in 13.7%, unknown in 55.8%, secondary malignancies in 4.2%, treatment related in 2.6% and not related to disease in 23.7%. A total of 278 pts survived &gt; 10 yrs, and of these pts, 119 (30%) had not relapsed at the last follow up. Conclusion The addition of rituximab to standard anthracycline based chemotherapy has resulted in significant improvements in the PFS and OS rates of FL. These results also support the prognostic value of the FLIPI in patients treated in the rituximab era. Late relapses after 10 yrs from disease can occur, but 11.5% of patients had not relapsed with long term follow up. Secondary malignancies are also an important consideration in the long term survivors. Disclosures Lunning: Acrotech: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Curis: Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Aeratech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Legend: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Armitage:Trovagene/Cardiff Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samus Therapeutics: Consultancy; Ascentage: Consultancy. Vose:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Allogene: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Wugen: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria; Loxo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Final overall survival in the phase 3 NETTER-1 study of lutetium-177-DOTATATE in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4112-4112
Author(s):  
Jonathan R. Strosberg ◽  
Martyn E Caplin ◽  
Pamela L. Kunz ◽  
Philippe B Ruszniewski ◽  
Lisa Bodei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Radioligand Therapy ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Safety Signals

4112 Background: As demonstrated in the primary analysis of the phase 3 NETTER-1 trial, 177Lu-DOTATATE significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus high-dose long-acting octreotide, with a HR of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.29; p < 0.0001), in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated, somatostatin receptor-positive midgut neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Here we report final overall survival (OS) for NETTER-1. Methods: In this international open-label trial, eligible patients were randomized to receive either four cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) every 8 ± 1 weeks plus long-acting octreotide 30 mg or high-dose long-acting octreotide 60 mg every 4 weeks (control arm), both on top of best supportive care. After disease progression on randomized treatment or completion of an 18-month treatment period, patients in both arms entered long-term follow-up and could receive further anti-cancer treatment as recommended by their physicians. The primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST 1.1 and OS was a key secondary endpoint. Primary intention-to-treat analysis of OS was prespecified to take place after 158 deaths or 5 years after the last patient was randomized, whichever occurred first. Results: Of 231 randomized patients, 101/117 (86.3%) in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm and 99/114 (86.8%) in the control arm entered long-term follow-up. Final analysis occurred 5 years after the last patient was randomized, following 142 deaths, with a median follow-up of more than 76 months. During long-term follow-up, 41/114 (36%) of patients in the control arm received subsequent radioligand therapy (“cross-over”), the majority (22.8%) within 24 months. Median OS was 48.0 months (95% CI: 37.4, 55.2) in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm and 36.3 months (95% CI: 25.9, 51.7) in the control arm. HR was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.60, 1.17) with p = 0.30 (unstratified 2-sided log-rank test). A total of 2/112 (1.8%) 177Lu-DOTATATE treated patients in the study developed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). No new cases of MDS or acute leukemia were reported in the long-term follow-up. Overall, no new safety signals emerged during long-term follow-up. Conclusions: Median OS was 48.0 months in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm of the NETTER-1 trial and 36.3 months in the control arm. This difference was not statistically significant, potentially impacted by a high rate (36%) of cross-over of patients in the control arm to radioligand therapy after progression. In overall conclusion, the NETTER-1 study demonstrated that 177Lu-DOTATATE yielded a clinically and statistically significant improvement in PFS as a primary endpoint (HR: 0.18, p < 0.0001) as well as a clinically meaningful trend towards improvement in median OS of 11.7 months. No new safety signals emerged during the 5-year long-term follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT01578239.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of high-dose chemotherapy with in vivo purged auto-SCT in relapsed follicular lymphoma: long-term follow-up

2009 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1119-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Magni ◽  
M Di Nicola ◽  
C Carlo-Stella ◽  
L Devizzi ◽  
A Guidetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Long-Term Follow-Up of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) with Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) for Patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2898-2898
Author(s):  
Partow Kebriaei ◽  
Michelle Detry ◽  
Antonio Carrasco-Yalan ◽  
Athanasios Anagnostopoulos ◽  
Daniel Couriel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Disease Group ◽  
Blast Phase

Abstract Allogeneic SCT remains an effective strategy for inducing durable remission in CML. RIC regimens are less myelosuppressive, but adequately immunosuppressive, allowing for engraftment with acceptable treatment-related mortality (TRM) in older pts who otherwise would not be candidates for SCT. The long-term antitumor effect of this approach is not well-established. This is relevant in CML, since many pts present for SCT with advanced disease after failing tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Patients, Methods: We evaluated outcomes of 64 CML pts (40 M/24 F) with median age 52 yrs (range 18–72) treated from June 1996 to April 2005 with FAI (fludarabine 120 mg/m2, Ara-C 8 gm/m2, idarubicin 36 mg/m2), FM140 (fludarabine 120 mg/m2, melphalan 140 mg/m2 +/− Ara-C 2 gm/m2) or FM180 (fludarabine 120 mg/m2, melphalan 180 mg/m2) and unmanipulated stem cells. Disease stage at time of study entry was first chronic (n=13), second chronic (n=17), accelerated (n=29), or blast phase (n=5), with median time from diagnosis to SCT of 2.6 yrs (range 0.5–20.3). Stem cell source was bone marrow (n=38) or peripheral blood (n=26), and donor type was matched related (n=30), 1 Ag mismatched related (n=4), or matched unrelated (n=30). Graft vs. host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and mini-dose methotrexate in all but 6 pts (CSA-based). Anti-thymocyte-globulin was added to all pts other than matched related. Maintenance therapy with TKIs following SCT was not used. Multivariate analysis was done using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 22 pts were alive at a median follow up of 7 yrs from SCT (range 0.8–9.8). OS and PFS were 48% and 30%, respectively, at 2 yrs, and 33% and 30%, respectively, at 5 yrs. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grades II–IV and III–IV were 31% and 14%, respectively, and chronic GVHD was 32% (22% for extensive). TRM at 100 days, 1-, 2-, and 5- yrs were 2%, 14%, 20%, and 33%, respectively. There was no association between pt age, donor source, preparative regimen, or time to SCT and TRM. Disease recurrence accounted for 12 of 42 deaths. There were 3 cases of graft rejection, with 1 death from graft rejection. Only disease stage at time of SCT was significantly predictive in multivariate analysis for both OS and PFS. Pts with advanced disease had worse OS (HR 2.36, 95%CI 1.25–4.46, p=0.008, see figure) and PFS (HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.05–3.49, p=0.035) than pts in chronic phase. In multivariate for PFS, pts who developed grade I or II acute GVHD were less likely to progress compared to pts who did not develop any GVHD: grade I (HR 0.324, 95%CI 0.13–0.84, p=0.027) and grade II (HR 0.286, 95%CI 0.11–0.78, p=0.014). Conclusion: RIC SCT provides adequate disease control in chronic phase CML pts. The development of some GVHD is protective in this setting. TRM rates are acceptable but continue to increase over time. Alternative treatment strategies need to be explored in pts with accelerated or blast phase disease. Results may be improved with addition of TKI therapy post SCT. Survival by Disease Group Survival by Disease Group

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document