Cardiac Events in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Venetoclax in Combination with Hypomethylating Agents

Abstract Background: Venetoclax, a small-molecule inhibitor of B cell leukemia/lymphoma-2, in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) has shown improved efficacy and survival benefit compared to HMA alone (DiNardo et al, 2020) in elderly/unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Since FDA-approval of this regimen for elderly/unfit AML patients, it is frequently utilized both in the upfront and relapsed/refractory setting. Cardiac events with venetoclax are not well described. In the VIALE-E trial, which included patients ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy due to congestive heart failure or stable angina, 15% of patients receiving azacitidine plus venetoclax experienced atrial fibrillation as a serious adverse event, vs. 1% in the azacitidine plus placebo group (DiNardo et al, 2020). Our objective was to provide an estimate of the prevalence of and a description of all cardiac events that occurred in AML patients undergoing treatment with venetoclax + HMA. Methods: 170 consecutive patients with AML who received venetoclax +HMA (azacitidine or decitabine) outside the context of a clinical trial between 1/2017-11/2020 at the Mayo Clinic were included. Patients received venetoclax + HMA either as upfront treatment or for relapsed/refractory disease. Patients with relapse following allogeneic stem cell transplant were excluded. We evaluated all cardiac events that occurred while treatment with venetoclax + HMA was ongoing. Baseline patient and treatment characteristics were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Fisher's exact test. All statistics were computed using EZR (Version 1.53). Results: 1. Patient characteristics A total of 170 patients who received venetoclax + HMA (median age 69 years [range 17-91], 63% males) were included. ELN risk category was either adverse risk (48%, 82/170) or intermediate risk (48%, 82/170) in the majority of patients. 64% (109/170) of patients received venetoclax + HMA as upfront treatment. Characteristics including age, ELN cytogenetic risk, cardiovascular risk factors, and upfront vs relapsed therapy were similar among patients with or without cardiac events. The only exception was a higher incidence of CEBPA mutation amongst those with cardiac events (12% vs 2%, p=0.03). The majority (83%, 141/170) of patients underwent an echocardiogram prior to initiation of therapy. 2. Cardiac events Of 170 patients treated with venetoclax + HMA during the study period, 34 (20%) patients experienced a total of 48 cardiac events. Of patients experiencing cardiac events, 32% (11/34) had no pre-existing cardiac disease and 12% (4/34) had no cardiovascular risk factors (Table 1). The majority of events occurred early in treatment course: 41% during cycle 1, 26% during cycle 2 and 15% during cycle 3 (Table 1). The most frequently occurring cardiac event (21%, 10/48 events) was a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography, which was associated with symptoms in all ten patients. Second most frequent was atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response at 17% (8/48 events), followed by troponin elevation without electrocardiogram changes at 15% (7/46 events). Of patients with troponin elevation, 57% (4/7 events) occurred in the setting of another inciting factor such as severe anemia, while 43% represented a troponin elevation without explanation (Table 1). Other cardiac events included heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=4), other symptomatic arrhythmia (n=4), and symptomatic pericardial effusion or pericarditis (n=3). In addition, 2 of 34 (6%) patients experienced fatal cardiopulmonary arrest. The majority (88%) of cardiac events required either inpatient admission (62%, 21/34 patients) or intensive care unit (ICU) care (26%, 9/34 patients). 77% of patients required new cardiac medications or procedural intervention (n=4). In 27% of cases (9/34 patients), the cardiac event directly contributed to death (Table 1). Conclusions: Cardiac complications were observed in one-fifth (20%) of AML patients treated with venetoclax + HMA, despite the absence of preexisting cardiac disease in a third of cases; moreover 27% of events were fatal. Further comparative studies are required to identify salient clinical features predictive of cardiac complications in these patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding; Astex: Other: Research support to institution. Litzow: Astellas: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Pluristem: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee. Patnaik: Kura Oncology: Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcomes and Predictors of Relapse with Use of Hypomethylating Agents in Combination with Venetoclax Prior to Allogeneic Transplant in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150815 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2327-2327

Author(s):

Imran Nizamuddin ◽

Timothy Seijung Oh ◽

Yazan Numan ◽

Max Farber Kelsten ◽

Madelyn Burkart ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Intermediate Risk ◽

Hypomethylating Agents ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has evolved tremendously. Recently, venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (HMA/ven) demonstrated durable responses in the frontline and relapsed/refractory (R/R) settings. This regimen is now standard of care for older adults or those unfit for intensive induction chemotherapy (DiNardo CD, N Engl J Med, 2020). Our institution also often uses HMA/ven to treat fit patients (pts) with high risk disease characteristics. Because HMA/ven was studied in transplant-ineligible pts, outcomes following potentially curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remain unknown. This retrospective study aims to describe characteristics and outcomes of pts treated with HMA/ven who proceeded to HSCT. Methods Adult pts diagnosed with AML and treated with HMA/ven either in the frontline or R/R setting between 1/2010 and 2/2020 at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University were identified. Hypomethylating agents included either azacitadine or decitabine. Data were collected and analyzed based on demographics, laboratory and clinical characteristics, and disease and toxicity outcomes. Efficacy endpoints included complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp). Survival curves for overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses were performed to determine impact of clinical variables on outcomes (significance defined as p≤0.05). Cohorts were compared using χ 2 or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the unpaired t-test for continuous variables. Results Clinical and demographic features at time of diagnosis are listed in Table 1. In total, 257 pts received HMA/ven. Of these, 36 pts received a HSCT, which was the population analyzed in this study. In the front-line setting 11 (31%) pts received HMA/ven and 25 (69%) pts received HMA/ven for R/R disease. 25 (69%) pts received azacitadine and 11 (31%) pts received decitabine (5 days, n=5, 14%; 10 days, n=6, 17%). Based on ELN guidelines, 23 (64%) pts had adverse risk disease at diagnosis. Response to HMA/ven in the pre-transplant setting is shown in Table 2. Of 35 evaluable pts, 34 achieved remission (CR, n=32, 91%; CRi, n=1, 3%; CRp, n=1, 3%). Table 3 shows outcomes following HSCT. 14 (39%) pts relapsed post HSCT and 13 (36%) pts received treatment for relapse. With a median follow-up of 11.6 months, median LFS from time of transplantation was 11.2 months. Median OS was not reached over follow up period but estimated to be 25.4 months. There was a significant difference in rates of relapse based on ELN classification at diagnosis (p=0.0296). In comparison, presence of complex/monosomal karyotypes (p=0.593), blast percentage at diagnosis (p=0.456), donor type (p=0.484), and number of previous lines of therapy (p=0.822) did not predict for relapse. Median LFS in adverse and favorable/intermediate risk ELN groups was 5.8 and 19.8 months, respectively. Median OS in adverse and favorable/intermediate risk ELN groups was 25.4 and 29.5 months, respectively. Following transplant, 10 (28%) pts received maintenance therapy with a median of 5 cycles (range 1-14); 8 pts (22%) received HMA/ven maintenance following HSCT. There was no significant difference in relapse rates between those who received maintenance therapy (n=6, 43%) and those who did not (n=8, 57%) (p = 0.107). Median time to relapse from HSCT was 4.42 months in those who received maintenance therapy compared to 2.98 months in those who did not receive maintenance therapy (p=0.370). Following relapse, 10 (28%) pts were retreated with HMA/ven, but less than half (n=4, 40%) had a response. To date, 22 (61%) pts are alive with the majority (n=19, 86%) in remission. 14 (39%) pts died with half in remission at the time of death. Conclusions Our study showed that HMA/ven can feasibly be used not only to bridge to transplant, but to achieve durable remissions post HSCT. For those pts that relapsed post HSCT, duration of remission was very short. ELN classification was the only factor that informed relapse risk. Prospective studies must be done to understand which cytogenetic and molecular subgroups benefit the most from HMA/ven prior to transplant. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Abaza: BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman: Biosight: Consultancy, Other: Travel fees, Research Funding; Fujifilm: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Kartos: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; ALZ Oncology: Research Funding; Theradex: Consultancy, Other: Advisory boards; Syros: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; GlycoMimetics: Other: Participation on an advisory board; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Consultancy. Dinner: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Induction Strategies and Responses for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Resistance to Hypomethylating Agents for Antecedent Myeloid Malignancy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119879 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 665-665 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Chetasi Talati ◽

Aaron D Goldberg ◽

Amanda Przespolewski ◽

Onyee Chan ◽

Najla Al Ali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Hypomethylating Agents ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Induction Regimen ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Outcomes in patients (pts) with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) (therapy related myeloid neoplasms and AML with myelodysplasia related changes (MRC) per WHO 2016 classification (Arber et al, Blood 2016)) are poor. Pts treated with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have suboptimal responses to induction chemotherapy (IC) upon transformation to AML. Previously, it was retrospectively demonstrated that the IC with cladribine, cytarabine, filgrastim, and mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) yields significantly higher response rates (64%) than 7+3 (cytarabine and anthracycline) (29%) in pts with prior HMA exposure (Jaglal et al, Leukemia Research 2014). Following the recent approval of CPX-351 for induction in sAML subgroup, we investigated outcomes after CPX-351 to cladribine based regimens and 7+3 in pts with sAML with prior HMA exposure. Methods We identified pts with sAML who had prior HMA treatment for an antecedent hematologic malignancy (AHM) and later received induction chemotherapy upon AML transformation from Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) (n=229), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n=11) and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (n=2). Patients were divided into 3 cohorts based on induction regimen: (A) cladribine based (CLA+/-G+/-M) (B) standard 7+3 and (C) CPX-351. Demographics, disease-specific variables, and outcomes were collected in accordance with the institutional review board approved protocol. Responders (R) were defined as pts achieving CR or CRi as defined by the 2003 International Working Group (IWG) criteria after 1 or 2 cycles of the either induction regimen whereas non-responders (NR) were defined as responses other than CR/CRi. Pts receiving a second induction with a different regimen were considered NR. Fisher's exact test and the ANOVA test were used to determine significance for continuous and categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was performed to estimate overall survival (OS). Results Among 242 pts who received IC for AML after HMA failure for prior AHM, 114 were treated with (A) cladribine based regimen (B) 94 pts with standard 3+7 and (C) 34 pts with CPX-351 (Cohort C). Baseline characteristics for all 3 cohorts are outlined in Table 1A. Median age for cohort A, B, and C were 65 (33-82), 66 (26-81), and 69 (36-82), respectively. Males comprised of 68.4%, 63% and 52.9% of the cohorts A, B and C, respectively. No pts had favorable-risk karyotype as defined by European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 criteria. Adverse risk karyotype was noted in 42.1% of cohort A, 34.6% of cohort B and 22.7% of cohort C (p=.337). The majority of pts received azacitidine as their HMA for their AHM (88.7%, 84.9% and 82.4% in cohorts A, B, C, respectively) and median number of cycles administered prior to transformation to AML were 6, 4 and 5 for cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. Response rates in each cohort are summarized in Table 1B. The CR/CRi rate was 53% in cohort A, 32% in cohort B and 41.1% in cohort C (p=.005 between cohort A and B) (p=.329 between cohorts A and C) (p=.526 between cohorts B and C). The early death rates (<60 days of induction) were not significantly different among the 3 cohorts, at 12%, 8% and 2.9% in cohorts A, B and C respectively (p=.200). In pts who received ≤ 4 cycles of HMAs prior to AML transformation, response rates to CPX-351 were higher (64.3%) than in pts who received >4 cycles of HMAs (25.0%) (p=.0397). Cohort A (56.5% vs. 50.0%, p=.288) and B (39.1% vs. 25.5%, p=.175) did not demonstrate such a difference (Table 1C and 1D). There was a trend towards better OS (19.9 vs. 5.5mo) with CPX-351 treated pts with ≤ 4 cycles of HMAs compared to >4 cycles (p=.092) (Figure 1). To date, 70.0% of responding pts in cohort A have undergone an allogeneic stem cell transplant compared to 31.0% in cohort B and 28.6% in cohort C (p=.15). There was no significant difference in median OS among the 3 groups, cohort A (7.27 months), cohort B (7.63 months) and cohort C (7.07 months) (p=.887). Among responders, the mOS did not differ (12.93, 21.7, and 19.9 months for cohorts A, B, and C respectively, p=.635). Conclusions We demonstrate that cladribine-based induction regimens and CPX-351 yield higher CR/CRi rates compared to 7+3 in pts with sAML after HMA failure. Prolonged duration of HMA exposure may lower response potential with CPX-351 upon AML transformation. Median OS remains poor and did not differ among the 3 groups illustrating the unmet need for therapy for sAML pts after HMA failure. Disclosures Goldberg: AROG: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Sallman:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. List:Celgene: Research Funding. Wang:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Tallman:AROG: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; BioSight: Other: Advisory board. Komrokji:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Sweet:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Phizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Phizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The Application of Machine Learning to Improve the Subclassification and Prognostication of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139013 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 28-28

Author(s):

Hassan Awada ◽

Arda Durmaz ◽

Carmel Gurnari ◽

Ashwin Kishtagari ◽

Manja Meggendorfer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Somatic Mutations ◽

Cross Validation ◽

Steering Committee ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Genomic Features ◽

Acute Myeloid

Genetic mutations (somatic or germline), cytogenetic abnormalities and their combinations contribute to the heterogeneity of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) phenotypes. To date, prototypic founder lesions [e.g., t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17)] define only a fraction of AML subgroups with specific prognoses. Indeed, in a larger proportion of AML patients, somatic mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities potentially serve as driver lesions in combination with numerous acquired secondary hits. However, their combinatorial complexity can preclude the resolution of distinct genomic classifications and overlap across classical pathomorphologic AML subtypes, including de novo/primary (pAML) and secondary AML (sAML) evolving from an antecedent myeloid neoplasm (MN). These prognostically discrete AML subtypes are themselves nonspecific due to variable understanding of their pathogenetic links, especially in cases without overt dysplasia. Without dysplasia, reliance is mainly on anamnestic clinical information that might be unavailable or cannot be correctly assigned due to a short prodromal history of antecedent MN. We explored the potential of genomic markers to sub-classify AML objectively and provide unbiased personalized prognostication, irrespective of the clinicopathological information, and thus become a standard in AML assessment. We collected and analyzed genomic data from a multicenter cohort of 6788 AML patients using standard and machine learning (ML) methods. A total of 13,879 somatic mutations were identified and used to predict traditional pathomorphologic AML classifications. Logistic regression modeling (LRM) detected mutations in CEBPA (both monoallelic "CEBPAMo" and biallelic "CEBPABi"), DNMT3A, FLT3ITD, FLT3TKD, GATA2, IDH1, IDH2R140, NRAS, NPM1 and WT1 being enriched in pAML while mutations in ASXL1, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, -5/del(5q), -7/del(7q), -17/del(17P), del(20q), +8 and complex karyotype being prevalent in sAML. Despite these significant findings, the genomic profiles of pAML vs. sAML identified by LRM resulted in only 74% cross-validation accuracy of the predictive performance when used to re-assign them. Therefore, we applied Bayesian Latent Class Analysis that identified 4 unique genomic clusters of distinct prognoses [low risk (LR), intermediate-low risk (Int-Lo), intermediate-high risk (Int-Hi) and high risk (HR) of poor survival) that were validated by survival analysis. To link each prognostic group to pathogenetic features, we generated a random forest (RF) model that extracted invariant genomic features driving each group and resulted in 97% cross-validation accuracy when used for prognostication. The model's globally most important genomic features, quantified by mean decrease in accuracy, included NPM1MT, RUNX1MT, ASXL1MT, SRSF2MT, TP53MT, -5/del(5q), DNMT3AMT, -17/del(17p), BCOR/L1MT and others. The LR group was characterized by the highest prevalence of normal cytogenetics (88%) and NPM1MT (100%; 86% with VAF>20%) with co-occurring DNMT3AMT (52%), FLT3ITD-MT (27%; 91% with VAF <50%), IDH2R140-MT (16%, while absent IDH2R172-MT), and depletion or absence of ASXL1MT, EZH2MT, RUNX1MT, TP53MT and complex cytogenetics. Int-Lo had a higher percentage of abnormal cytogenetics cases than LR, the highest frequency of CEBPABi-MT (9%), IDH2R172K-MT (4%), FLT3ITD-MT (14%) and FLT3TKD-MT (6%) occurring without NPM1MT, while absence of NPM1MT, ASXL1MT, RUNX1MT and TP53MT. Int-Hi had the highest frequency of ASXL1MT (39%), BCOR/L1MT (16%), DNMT3AMT without NPM1MT (19%), EZH2MT (9%), RUNX1MT (52%), SF3B1MT (7%), SRSF2MT (38%) and U2AF1MT (12%). Finally, HR had the highest prevalence of abnormal cytogenetics (96%), -5/del(5q) (68%), -7del(7q) (35%), -17del(17p) (31%) and the highest odds of complex karyotype (76%) as well as TP53MT (70%). The model was then internally and externally validated using a cohort of 203 AML cases from the MD Anderson Cancer Center. The RF prognostication model and group-specific survival estimates will be available via a web-based open-access resource. In conclusion, the heterogeneity inherent in the genomic changes across nearly 7000 AML patients is too vast for traditional prediction methods. Using newer ML methods, however, we were able to decipher a set of prognostic subgroups predictive of survival, allowing us to move AML into the era of personalized medicine. Disclosures Advani: OBI: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: steering committee/ honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory board/ honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Takeda: Research Funding. Ravandi:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Orsenix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Carraway:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); Stemline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); ASTEX: Other: Independent Advisory Committe (IRC); Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Saunthararajah:EpiDestiny: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Kantarjian:Sanofi: Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aptitute Health: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Adaptive biotechnologies: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; BioAscend: Honoraria; Delta Fly: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Oxford Biomedical: Honoraria. Kadia:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Cellenkos: Research Funding; JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pulmotec: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sekeres:Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda/Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski:Alexion, BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Ischemic Cardiac Event

10.2310/vasc.8004 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Megan Lanigan ◽

Matthew Culling ◽

Robert Gould ◽

Michael Wall ◽

Joss Thomas

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Cardiac Disease ◽

Cardiac Event ◽

Myocardial Injury ◽

High Cholesterol ◽

Cardiac Events ◽

Troponin Elevation ◽

Adverse Cardiac Events ◽

Common Causes ◽

Artery Disease

An estimated 92.1 million Americans have at least one type of cardiovascular disease (CAD).1 Even though death rates due to CAD have declined, at least 2200 Americans die each day of CAD. 2 In the U.S. at least 50 million operations occur every year and up to 4% are associated with adverse cardiac events. 3There are many identifiable risk factors for cardiac disease such as diabetes, hypertension, obesity, smoking, and high cholesterol. 1In addition, there are non-modifiable risks for cardiac disease; these include age, gender, family history, and homocysteine levels. 4 Hypotension and tachycardia are the most common causes of ischemic cardiac events in the intra-operative phase. The failure to detect myocardial injury early on may contribute to complications as long as 30 days post-operatively. Typically, ischemic findings on electrocardiography and elevated troponin measurements have been used as potential indicators of ischemia or myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery in the peri-operative setting. In the treatment of ischemic cardiac events, intensified medical therapy (antiplatelet, beta-blocker, ACE inhibitor, or a statin) in patients who suffered from a troponin elevation in the postoperative period reduces the risk of having a major cardiac event within a year. This review contains 1 figure, 2 tables, and 74 references. Keywords: Myocardial Injury after Non Cardiac Surgery (MINS), Perioperative ischemia, Troponin assay, VISION study, Coronary artery disease

Download Full-text

Lack of Association of Mutations in IDH1, IDH2, DNMT3A with Outcome in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Hypomethylating Agents (± Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2483.2483 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2483-2483

Author(s):

Farhad Ravandi ◽

Keyur P. Patel ◽

Rajyalakshmi Luthra ◽

Sherry A. Pierce ◽

Gautam Borthakur ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Valproic Acid ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Histone Deacetylase ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hypomethylating Agents ◽

Idh Mutations ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 2483 Background: Mutations of several genes believed to be important in the methylation apparatus of the cell have been recently described in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but their presence has not been correlated with a worse or better outcome using hypomethylating agents. Methods: We evaluated the association of mutations in IDH1, IDH2, DNMT3A, and EZH2 with the outcome [complete response (CR) rate, event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS)] among patients older than 60 with AML (≥ 20% blasts) treated with hypomethylating agents as their first line of treatment. TET2 mutations were not evaluated due to lack of available material. Results: Among the 68 patients (median age 72 years; range, 60 – 83) with available data, 11 patients (16%) had IDH1 or IDH2 mutations (mutually exclusive) and 10 patients (15%) had DNMT3A mutations with 5 patients (7%) having both IDH and DNMT3A mutations. Cytogenetics was diploid in 19 (28%), abnormal chromosome 5/7 and/or complex in 27 (40%), trisomy 8 in 5 (7%), miscellaneous in 14 (21%), and insufficient in 3 (4%). Presence of IDH mutations was associated with a diploid karyotype and the presence of NPM1 mutations (p=.03 and p=.02, respectively) but not with FLT3- ITD or RAS mutations (present in 7 and 4 patients, respectively). DNMT3A mutations were not associated with any specific karyotype or with the presence of NPM1, FLT3-ITD, or RAS mutations. None of the 68 patients had EZH2 mutations. All patients were treated with hypomethylating agents [decitabine in 39 (57%) and 5-azacytidine in 29 (43%)] with 42 patients (62%) receiving concomitant histone deacetylase inhibitor therapy (SAHA or valproic acid). Overall, 17 patients (25%) achieved CR; the presence of IDH or DNMT3A mutations or both was not associated with achievement of CR. With a median duration of follow-up of 60 months, the median EFS is 3.3 months (range, 0.25 – 3.75 months) and the median overall survival is 6 months (range, 0.25 – 90.5 months). Presence of IDH mutations was not associated with an impact on EFS (p=.29) or OS (p=.14). Similarly, DNMT3A mutations were not associated with an effect on EFS (p=.21) or OS (p=.58). The presence of both IDH and DNMT3A mutations was also not associated with a better or worse response, EFS, or OS as compared with patients with neither mutation. Conclusion: We were not able to detect an association between presence of IDH1/2 and DNMT3A mutations and outcome in this elderly population of patients with AML treated with epigenetic modulators. Disclosures: Ravandi: Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of decitabine, 5-azacytidine, SAHA, and valproic acid in the treatment of older patients with AML. Garcia-Manero:Celgene: Research Funding. Cortes:Celgene: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Loss of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Differentiation Is Highly Predictive for Persistent Measurable Residual Disease and Poor Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112591 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1523-1523

Author(s):

Wenbin Xiao ◽

Aaron D Goldberg ◽

Christopher Famulare ◽

Sean Delvin ◽

Minal Patel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Flow Cytometry ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Post Induction ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Poor Outcomes ◽

Measurable Residual Disease ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Measurable residual disease (MRD) is associated with inferior outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MRD monitoring enhances risk stratification and may guide therapeutic intervention. Post-induction MRD is frequently cleared with further therapy and the clearance may lead to better outcomes. In contrast, persistent MRD is associated with poor outcomes. At present it is not possible to predict which patients are likely to clear MRD with further therapy. Here we report a simple, objective, widely applicable and quantitative MFC approach using the ratio of blast/PDC to predict persistent MRD and poor outcomes in AML. Patients and Methods A cohort of 136 adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of AML by WHO criteria who underwent standard induction therapy at a single center between 4/2014 and 9/2017 was initially included. 69 patients achieved complete morphologic remission (36 MRD-neg. and 33 MRD-pos.). MRD status was assessed by MFC using a different from normal (DfN) approach. PDC were quantified as the percent of total WBC by flow cytometry based on low side scatter, moderate CD45, CD303, bright CD123 and HLA-DR expression. Results The proportion of PDC was markedly decreased in patients with AML (≥20% blasts) (N=136) with a median of 0.016% (interquartile range IQR: 0.0019%-0.071%, Figure 1A), more than 10-fold lower than observed in normal controls (median 0.23%, IQR 0.17%-0.34%) (N=20). While there was no difference between MRD-neg. and normal control groups (median 0.31%, IQR: 0.17%-0.49%; vs. 0.28%, IQR: 0.17%-0.34%), MRD-pos. group had significantly reduced PDC proportion compared to the control (median 0.074%, IQR: 0.022%-0.33%, Wilcoxon rank sum, p=0.019). In an attempt to achieve better separation and to eliminate possible effects of hemodilution, the ratio of blast/PDC was calculated by using the proportions of blasts and PDCs out of total WBCs as quantitated by flow cytometry. A cut-off threshold of the blast/PDC ratio of 10 was chosen to separate each group (Figure 1B). Importantly, a ratio cut-off of 10 had a corresponding specificity of 97.4% for predicting MRD positivity status. MRD positivity was significantly associated with inferior overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in our study cohort (OS HR 4.11 (95% CI: 1.30-13.03), p=0.016; RFS HR 4.20 (95% CI: 1.49-11.82), p=0.007, Figure 1C and D). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse in the MRD-neg. group compared to MRD-pos. group was 10% (95% CI: 2-24%) vs. 37% (95% CI: 18-56%, p=0.014). Importantly, blast/PDC ratio ≥10 was also strongly associated with inferior OS and RFS (OS HR 3.12 (95% CI: 1.13-8.60), p= 0.028; RFS HR 4.05 (95% CI: 1.63-10.11), p=0.003, Figure 1E and F), which is similar in magnitude to MRD positivity. Furthermore, MRD-pos. patients with blast/PDC ratio <10 had 4 times higher MRD clearance rate than MRD-pos. patients with a ratio ≥10 (6/11, 55% vs 2/17, 12%, Fisher exactp=0.02). Conclusion We have established an objective and quantitative MFC method to risk stratify post induction AML patients by risk for relapse, MRD clearance and likelihood of survival. Loss of PDC correlates with residual leukemia, is highly specific for MRD positivity in post-induction patients, and strongly predicts poorer overall survival and higher likelihood of relapse. Loss of PDC also predicts persistent MRD in post-induction MRD-pos. patients despite further therapy, suggesting that MRD-pos. patients with normal PDC may benefit from further therapy prior to transplant, while MRD-pos. patients with loss of PDC may not. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Goldberg: AROG: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Geyer:Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Levine:Isoplexis: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Honoraria; Qiagen: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prelude: Research Funding; Imago: Equity Ownership; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Epizyme: Patents & Royalties; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tallman:BioSight: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board.

Download Full-text

Updated Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial of Idarubicin and Cytarabine with Clofarabine or Fludarabine in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1067.1067 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1067-1067

Author(s):

Nicholas J. Short ◽

Farhad Ravandi ◽

Xuelin Huang ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Naveen Pemmaraju ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Historical Cohort ◽

To Receive ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Fludarabine and clofarabine are purine nucleoside analogues with established clinical activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We sought to evaluate the relative safety and efficacy of idarubicin and cytarabine with either clofarabine (CIA) or fludarabine (FAI) in adult patients (pts) with newly diagnosed AML. Methods: Adult pts ≤60 years of age with newly diagnosed non-APL AML were randomized using a Bayesian adaptive design to receive either CIA or FAI. All pts received induction with idarubicin 10 mg/m2 IV daily on days 1-3 and cytarabine 1000 mg/m2 IV daily for on days 1-5. Pts in the CIA arm also received clofarabine 15 mg/m2 IV daily on days 1-5; pts in the FAI arm received fludarabine 30 mg/m2 IV daily on days 1-5. Responding pts could receive up to 6 cycles of consolidation with attenuated doses of the same drug combination. The primary endpoint was to compare the event-free survival (EFS) of CIA and FAI. Secondary endpoints included the CR/CRp rates, overall survival (OS) and the safety of the regimens. Results: Between 8/2011 and 6/2016, 182 pts have been randomized to receive either CIA (n=106) or FAI (n=76). Baseline characteristics of the 2 arms were well-balanced and are summarized in Table 1. Response rates are summarized in Table 2. Of the 180 pts evaluable for response, the CR/CRp rate was similar in the CIA and FAI arms (80% and 81%, respectively). However, the rate of MRD negativity by multiparameter flow cytometry at the time of CR/CRp was significantly higher in pts who received CIA than in those who received FAI (80% vs. 64%, respectively, P<0.05). Rates of stem cell transplant (SCT) in first remission were similar in the two arms (35% vs. 38%, respectively). The median duration of follow-up was 27 months. The median EFS and OS for the entire cohort were 12 months and 39 months, respectively. The median EFS was similar in the CIA and FAI arms (13 months and 12 months, respectively, P=0.91). The imbalance in sample size between these two arms was caused by better performance of the CIA arm during the initial period of the trial, although the difference largely disappeared after further follow-up. There was also no difference in OS between the two regimens; the 2-year OS rates were 51% and 57%, respectively (P=0.24). No difference in survival was observed if pts were censored at the time of SCT. Overall, treatment was safe with 8-week mortality rates of 4% in the CIA arm and 1% in the FAI arm. When compared to a historical cohort of pts treated with idarubicin and cytarabine (IA) alone, the triplet regimen (pooled population of CIA + FAI) resulted in improved EFS and OS among a subgroup of patients <40 years of age. In this group of younger patients, the median EFS for CIA/FAI (n=38) and IA (n=16) were 25 months and 9 months, with a 2-year EFS rate of 52% and 33% respectively (P=0.27). There was also a strong trend towards superior OS in the CIA/FAI compared to the IA groups (median OS: not reached vs. 20 months; 2-year OS rate 68% vs. 47%; P=0.08). Conclusions: In adult pts with newly diagnosed AML, CIA and FAI resulted in similar rates of CR/CRp and had similar EFS and OS. Compared to a historical cohort of pts treated with IA alone, the addition of a nucleoside analogue appears to result in superior EFS and OS in younger pts. Disclosures Cortes: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Daver:Ariad: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kiromic: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jain:Novimmune: Consultancy, Honoraria; Infinity: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Konopleva:Calithera: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding. Wierda:Acerta: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. DiNardo:Novartis: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Agios: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. O'Brien:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jabbour:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Venetoclax Combination Therapy with Hypomethylating Agents in Patients with Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129514 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5089-5089 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Varun Mittal ◽

Mimi Lo ◽

Lloyd E. Damon ◽

Karin L. Gaensler ◽

Thomas G. Martin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Hypomethylating Agents ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Venetoclax (VEN), a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) has high efficacy in treatment-naïve elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The role for VEN in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or other myeloproliferative neoplasms remains incompletely defined. In particular, the efficacy of VEN+HMA has not been studied systematically in patients who experience AML relapse following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Method: All patients treated with VEN+HMA (azacitidine or decitabine) for R/R de novo or secondary AML or progressive MDS following allogeneic HCT were identified and reviewed retrospectively. All included AML patients had overt clinical relapse with ≥ 5% bone marrow blasts or extramedullary disease biopsy proven to be AML. Patients were included in this analysis if they received at least 14 days of VEN therapy. Results: Eleven patients with median age 66 (range 25-75) were treated for R/R AML post-allogeneic HCT. Transplant characteristics included use of reduced intensity conditioning in 10/11 (91%), matched sibling donors in 5/11 (45%), matched unrelated donors in 5/11 (45%), and cord blood in 1/11 patients. The median time from HCT to relapse/disease progression was 7 months (range 3-36). Two patients had extramedullary relapse only, and the remainder had marrow involvement. Eight patients (73%) received azacitidine and 3 (27%) received decitabine in combination with VEN. All but two patients (82%) had prior HMA exposure and most received VEN+HMA as initial post-transplant salvage therapy (64%). Only one patient received donor lymphocyte infusion in conjunction with VEN+HMA therapy, and none proceeded to a second allotransplant. Nine patients (82%) experienced an objective response, which included 4 CR/CRi (36%) and 5 PR/SD (45%). In patients with CR/CRi, three patients had adverse risk cytogenetics and one had a favorable risk profile at diagnosis consisting of normal cytogenetics with an isolated NPM1 mutation. All patients who failed to remit with VEN+HMA had intermediate- or high-risk genetic features. The median number of treatment cycles given was 3 (range 1-20). Median survival was 11 months and estimated 6-month and 12-month survival was 82% and 36%, respectively. Three patients remain alive with median 16.5 months follow-up (range 2.5-32). Conclusion: Venetoclax in combination with HMA is a viable salvage option in patients with relapsed AML or progressive MDS after allogeneic HCT, including those with prior exposure to HMA. Although one patient in this cohort sustained long term complete remission, overall prognosis remains dismal in this high-risk patient population and improved treatment options for relapsed/refractory AML following alloHCT remain needed. Disclosures Damon: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martin:Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Roche and Juno: Consultancy. Olin:MedImmune: Research Funding; Ignyta: Research Funding; Clovis: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Revolution Medicine: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Mirati Therapeutics: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding. Smith:Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; fujiFilm: Research Funding; Revolution Medicines: Research Funding. Logan:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TeneoBio: Consultancy; Kiadis: Consultancy; Kadmon: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Ischemic Cardiac Event

10.2310/7ccsp.8004 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Megan Lanigan ◽

Matthew Culling ◽

Robert Gould ◽

Michael Wall ◽

Joss Thomas

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Cardiac Disease ◽

Cardiac Event ◽

Myocardial Injury ◽

High Cholesterol ◽

Cardiac Events ◽

Troponin Elevation ◽

Adverse Cardiac Events ◽

Common Causes ◽

Artery Disease

Download Full-text

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Is Associated with More Frequent and More Rapid Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Shorter Survival Than Myelodysplastic Syndrome, but Is Less Frequently Treated: Analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Data Linked to Medicare Enrollment Claims

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2784.2784 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2784-2784

Author(s):

Dan Zandberg ◽

Ting-Ying Huang ◽

Xuehua Ke ◽

Maria R. Baer ◽

Steven D. Gore ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Population Based ◽

Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Rapid Progression ◽

Hypomethylating Agents ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Myelomonocytic Leukemia ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 2784 Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal stem cell disorder that displays features of both a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Originally classified as an MDS subtype in the French-American-British (FAB) classification system, it was reclassified as an MDS/MPN in the World Health Organization (WHO) system. Based on SEER and NAACCR data, CMML is associated with shorter survival than MDS and MPN, but no other population-based data have been available to date. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) dataset linked to Medicare enrollment and claims data to compare patient demographics, baseline characteristics, treatments received, progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and survival between CMML and MDS. The sample included 792 CMML and 6,588 MDS patients diagnosed from 2001 through 2005. MDS cases were 34.6% low-risk [RA, RARS, RCMD, del (5q)], 13.7% high-risk (RAEB), 1.4% therapy-related and 50.4% not otherwise specified. CMML and MDS patients did not differ in age (peak proportion at 80–84 years in both) or race distribution (90% and 88% white non-Hispanic, respectively). Male predominance was greater in CMML than in MDS (59.2% vs. 53.8%; p =.004). Baseline renal disease was more common among CMML patients (13.0% vs. 7.4%; p <.0001), while CHF/ischemic heart disease (37.4% vs. 44.6%; p =.000) and liver disease (2.8% vs.4.3%; p=.041) were more common in MDS. There was no difference in the proportion with poor performance status, diagnosis of other cancers within 5 years of CMML/MDS diagnosis, health care use prior to diagnosis or median household income. More CMML than MDS patients received no treatment (25.25% vs. 15.7%; p <.0001). Among patients who were treated, fewer CMML patients received blood transfusions (59.5% vs. 70.4%; p <.0001), erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (46.3% vs. 62.4; p <.0001) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (7.32% vs. 16.9%; p <.0001), while more CMML patients were treated with cytarabine (2.02 vs. 0.87; p =.002), etoposide (1.01 vs. 0.36%; p = 0.009) and bone marrow transplantation (1.14% vs. 0.47%; p =.016). There was no difference in treatment with hypomethylating agents between CMML and MDS patients (5.81% vs. 7.64%; p =.064). A higher percentage of CMML patients progressed to AML (42.6% vs. 16.3%; p < .0001) and progression occurred earlier (median 8 vs. 33 weeks; p < .0001). CMML patients had a lower survival probability at 1 year (51% vs. 66%; p <.0001) and at 3 years (19% vs. 37%; p <.0001), and a shorter median survival (13.3 vs. 24 months; p <.0001). Survival remained significantly lower across gender, age and race groups. In this population-based study, we have demonstrated that CMML patients less frequently receive therapeutic interventions, in relation to MDS patients, but in fact have a higher rate of progression to AML, more rapid progression to AML and shorter survival. The percentages of patients receiving hypomethylating agents for both diseases was low in our dataset and has likely increased following FDA approval of azacitidine in 2004 and decitabine in 2006. Our data support early application of disease-modifying therapies in CMML, and also support the need for clinical trials focused on this disease entity. Disclosures: Gore: Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Davidoff:Cellgene: Equity Ownership, Research Funding.

Download Full-text