A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Selinexor in Patients with Myelofibrosis Refractory or Intolerant to JAK Inhibitors

Abstract Background: Selinexor is an oral, small molecule, selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound that specifically blocks the karyopherin protein exportin 1 (XPO1, CRM1). In an shRNA library screen, we discovered that the survival of JAK2V167F mutant HEL cells is dependent on XPO1-mediated nuclear-cytoplasmic transport. Selinexor selectively suppressed primary myelofibrosis (MF) cells as compared with normal progenitor cells and induced hematologic responses in an MPN mouse model. Methods: An open label, prospective, investigator-initiated single center study is ongoing in adults with primary or secondary MF with resistance or intolerance to JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy with platelets > 30 K/μL and neutrophils > 500/μL. Selinexor was given orally once a week. Spleen volume was assessed by MRI at week 12 and week 24. The study was amended to include additional MRIs every 12 weeks in the year 1 and 24 weeks in the year 2. Primary end point is spleen response, defined as ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction (SVR) by MRI or CT, where applicable) at week 24. Bone marrow was evaluated at baseline and at week 24. The projected sample size of 24 will provide 83% power to reject a response rate of 15% and allow for up to a 25% dropout rate. We provide an interim report after completing 50% enrollment. Results: Between May 2019 and February 2021, 12 patients (pts) were enrolled. JAK2, CALR and MPL mutations were present in 7 (58.3%), 4 (33.3%) and 1 (8.3%) pts respectively. Eight pts (66.6%) had at least one high molecular risk mutation at baseline (Table 1). Median duration of prior JAKi therapy was 22 months (0.5 to 96 months) and 11 out of 12 were refractory to ruxolitinib at study enrollment. Median baseline spleen volume was 1454 cm 3(range 835 to 5792). Selinexor starting dose was 80 mg weekly in the first 6 pts and 60 mg for subsequent pts. At data cutoff, median duration of selinexor therapy was 36 weeks (range 11-114 weeks). One pt was not response evaluable and died due to liver abscess at week 12 (unrelated). One pt discontinued selinexor at week 18 due to grade 3 fatigue and was not evaluable for the primary end point. Of the 11 pts who had week 12 MRI or CT, 6 showed ≥ 10% SVR, 3 showed ≥ 25% SVR and 1 pt had early progression (Figure 1). At week 24, 5/9 (56%) pts had ≥ 25% SVR and 2/9 (22%) had ≥ 35% SVR (Figure 1). In 9 pts who had ≥24 weeks of selinexor, SVR ≥ 25% and ≥ 35% occurred at any point during study treatment in 4 (44%) and 3 (33%) pts, respectively. Two pts were red cell transfusion dependent at baseline; 1 became transfusion independent after 36 weeks of treatment, has not required transfusion for 49 weeks and remains on study treatment to date (114 weeks). Six pts (50%) discontinued selinexor. Reasons for treatment discontinuation are death in 1 pt, progressive disease in 1 pt, alternative treatment in 2 pts, and toxicity in 2 pts. Ten pts required dose reduction due to fatigue (1pt), anemia (1 pt), thrombocytopenia (2 pts), abdominal pain (1pt) and weight loss (5 pts). The most common treatment related adverse event was weight loss (grade 2 in 4 pts and grade 3 in 1 pt). This was manageable with treatment interruption and dose reduction, except in one pt who discontinued selinexor. As yet no changes in reticulin fibrosis MF grade were observed among 9 patients who received at least 24 weeks of treatment. Conclusions: Once weekly, oral selinexor showed single agent activity with sustained spleen responses in pts with JAKi refractory MF. Long-term administration of selinexor was well tolerated over time in MF pts. Correlatives studies including circulating inflammatory cytokine levels and mutant allele burden, as well as clonality studies by X-chromosome inactivation studies in woman, are underway and will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tantravahi: BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Abbvie Inc.: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Patel: Stemline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Chamoun: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shah: Karyopharm: Current Employment. George: Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy. Deininger: Fusion Pharma, Medscape, DisperSol: Consultancy; SPARC, DisperSol, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sangamo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Findings From Comfort-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy (BAT) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.801.801 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 801-801 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Francisco Cervantes ◽

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽

Dietger Niederwieser ◽

Andres Sirulnik ◽

Viktoriya Stalbovskaya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Extension Phase ◽

Spleen Volume ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 801 Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1 & 2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of MF. In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label study evaluating ruxolitinib versus BAT in patients (pts) with MF. The primary and key secondary endpoints were both met: the proportion of pts achieving a response (defined as a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 48 (ruxolitinib, 28.5%; BAT, 0%; P < .0001) and 24 (31.9% and 0%; P < .0001), respectively. The present analyses update the efficacy and safety findings of COMFORT-II (median follow-up, 112 wk). Methods: In COMFORT-II, 219 pts with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF and splenomegaly were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg bid, based on baseline platelet count [100-200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively]) or BAT. Efficacy results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis; a loss of spleen response was defined as a > 25% increase in spleen volume over on-study nadir that is no longer a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 112 wk (ruxolitinib, 113; BAT, 108), and the median duration of exposure 83.3 wk (ruxolitinib, 111.4 [randomized and extension phases]; BAT, 45.1 [randomized treatment only]). Because the core study has completed, all pts have either entered the extension phase or discontinued from the study. The primary reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; ruxolitinib, 11.6%; BAT, 6.8%), consent withdrawal (4.1% and 12.3%), and disease progression (2.7% and 5.5%). Overall, 72.6% of pts (106/146) in the ruxolitinib arm and 61.6% (45/73) in the BAT arm entered the extension phase to receive ruxolitinib, and 55.5% (81/146) of those originally randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. The primary reasons for discontinuation from the extension phase were progressive disease (8.2%), AEs (2.1%), and other (4.1%). Overall, 70 pts (48.3%) treated with ruxolitinib achieved a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study, and 97.1% of pts (132/136) with postbaseline assessments experienced a clinical benefit with some degree of reduction in spleen volume. Spleen reductions of ≥ 35% were sustained with continued ruxolitinib therapy (median duration not yet reached); the probabilities of maintaining the spleen response at wk 48 and 84 are 75% (95% CI, 61%-84%) and 58% (95% CI, 35%-76%), respectively (Figure). Since the last report (median 61.1 wk), an additional 9 and 12 deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively, resulting in a total of 20 (14%) and 16 (22%) deaths overall. Although there was no inferential statistical testing at this unplanned analysis, pts randomized to ruxolitinib showed longer survival than those randomized to BAT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00). As expected, given the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib as a JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, the most common new or worsened grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities during randomized treatment were anemia (ruxolitinib, 40.4%; BAT, 23.3%), lymphopenia (22.6%; 31.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9.6%; 9.6%). In the ruxolitinib arm, mean hemoglobin levels decreased over the first 12 wk of treatment and then recovered to levels similar to BAT from wk 24 onward; there was no difference in the mean monthly red blood cell transfusion rate among the ruxolitinib and BAT groups (0.834 vs 0.956 units, respectively). Nonhematologic AEs were primarily grade 1/2. Including the extension phase, there were no new nonhematologic AEs in the ruxolitinib group that were not observed previously (in ≥ 10% of pts), and only 1 pt had a new grade 3/4 AE (epistaxis). Conclusion: In COMFORT-II, ruxolitinib provided rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly; this analysis demonstrates that these reductions are sustained over 2 years of treatment in the majority of pts. Ruxolitinib-treated pts showed longer survival than those receiving BAT, consistent with the survival advantage observed in previous (Verstovsek et al. NEJM. 2012) and current analyses of COMFORT-I, as well as with the comparison of pts of the phase 1/2 study with matched historical controls (Verstovsek et al. Blood. 2012). Disclosures: Cervantes: Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Celgene: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: AdvisoryBoard Other, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, stock options Other. Passamonti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barbui:Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

A 3-Part, Phase 2 Study of Bezuclastinib (CGT9486), an Oral, Selective, and Potent KIT D816V Inhibitor, in Adult Patients with Nonadvanced Systemic Mastocytosis (NonAdvSM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147072 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3642-3642

Author(s):

Frank Siebenhaar ◽

Jason Gotlib ◽

Michael W. Deininger ◽

Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽

Francis Payumo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mast Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Systemic Mastocytosis ◽

Symptom Burden ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Management Committee ◽

Study Management ◽

Kit D816v

Abstract Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is characterized by mast cell infiltration of ≥ 1 extracutaneous organs and encompasses a spectrum of diagnoses that can range from a non-advanced to advanced disease (Shomali et al, 2018). There are two nonadvanced variants of SM: indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), which accounts for approximately 85% and smoldering systemic mastocytosis (SSM), which includes about 5% of the general SM population (Cohen et al, 2014, Jennings et al, 2014). ISM is characterized by 0 or 1 B-findings and SSM by 2 or more B findings and absence of organ damage or an associated hematologic neoplasm (Gotlib et al, 2018). There are currently no approved therapies to treat the underlying disease of ISM or SSM. Although anti-mediator therapies (e.g. anti-H1 and H2 antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, cromolyn sodium, corticosteroids) are used to control symptoms such as anaphylaxis, GI intolerance, and flushing to improve quality of life, their effectiveness and tolerability are variable. Many patients experience a persistently high symptom burden despite maximized anti-mediator therapies. Because the molecular pathogenesis of SM is driven by KIT D816V mutations in 95% of patients (Garcia-Montero et al, 2006, Jara-Acevedo et al, 2015, Vaes et al, 2017), other agents targeting this mutated kinase have been used to treat the spectrum of SM variants; however, toxicities such as cognitive impairment, GI effects, intracranial hemorrhage, and edema may limit dosing and thus efficacy. In addition to targeting KIT D816V, bezuclastinib was designed to avoid other closely related kinases with known liabilities, such as PDGFRα, PDGFRβ, wild-type KIT, VEGFR2 (KDR), and CSF1R (FMS). Furthermore, bezuclastinib has demonstrated minimal brain penetration and no CNS toxicities have been identified in preclinical studies. Preliminary clinical activity with bezuclastinib has been observed in patients with advanced solid tumors or locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). A reduction in KIT exon 17 mutational burden was observed in patients treated with bezuclastinib. This reduction was temporally associated with a reduction in tumor burden supporting bezuclastinib as an active therapy in KIT-driven diseases (Wagner et al, 2018). This is a multi-center, Phase 2, double blind, placebo-controlled, 3-part clinical study to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and biomarker correlates (e.g. bone marrow mast cell percentage, serum tryptase level, and KIT D816V mutation burden) of the KIT inhibitor bezuclastinib in patients with ISM and SSM. This study will enroll patients with SSM and moderate-to-severe ISM who have inadequate control of their symptoms despite at least 2 anti-mediator treatments. Part 1 of the study is intended to determine the recommended dose of bezuclastinib in Part 2. Subjects will be randomized to placebo or 1 of 3 doses of bezuclastinib which will be administered in combination with a baseline regimen of best supportive care (BSC). Part 2 will evaluate the efficacy of bezuclastinib at the selected dose as compared with placebo. Efficacy will be measured by the reduction of symptom burden as assessed by the mastocytosis activity score (MAS), a disease specific patient reported outcome tool (Siebenhaar et al, 2018). In Part 3, patients who have completed treatment in Part 1 or Part 2 of the study, including those initially randomized to placebo, may participate in a long-term extension and receive open-label bezuclastinib in combination with BSC. The study will enroll approximately 138 subjects. Data from this study will support further development of bezuclastinib in SM. Disclosures Gotlib: Cogent Biosciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair for the Eligibility and Central Response Review Committee, Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kartos: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Allakos: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Deininger: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; SPARC, DisperSol, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Part of a Study Management Committee, Research Funding; Fusion Pharma, Medscape, DisperSol: Consultancy; Sangamo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. DeAngelo: Incyte: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Blueprint: Research Funding; Glycomimetrics: Research Funding. Payumo: Cogent Biosciences, Inc: Current Employment. Mensing: Cogent Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Jolin: Cogent Biosciences: Current Employment. Sachs: Cogent Biosciences: Current Employment. George: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: study of investigational agent

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous-Administered Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients Who Harbor the Bcr- Abl T315I Mutation–Results of An Ongoing Multicenter Phase 2/3 Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.644.644 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 644-644 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Jorge Cortes-Franco ◽

H. Jean Khoury ◽

Franck Emmanuel Nicolini ◽

Selim Corm ◽

Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

T315i Mutation ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 644 Background: Omacetaxine is a first-in-class cetaxine with clinical activity against Ph+ CML and a mechanism of action independent of tyrosine kinase inhibition. Currently available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have not demonstrated activity in CML patients (Pts) who harbor the Bcr-Abl T315I mutation. Study Goals: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneously (SC) administered omacetaxine in Pts with imatinib (IM)-resistant T315I+ Ph+ CML. Methods: Eligible Pts include adult CML Pts in chronic, accelerated, or blast disease phase (CP, AP, BP) with a confirmed Bcr-Abl T315I mutation and resistance to IM therapy. Induction schedule: 1.25 mg/m2 SC omacetaxine twice daily for 14 days every 28 days until hematologic response. Maintenance dosing: 1.25 mg/m2 SC omacetaxine twice daily for 7 days every 28 days. Study Results: To date, 90 Pts have been enrolled, with data available for analysis on 66 Pts (40 CP, 16 AP and 10 BP). The median age was 58 yrs (19-83) with 70% male Pts and a median disease duration of 54 mo (5-285). All Pts failed prior IM therapy, and 79% failed two or more prior TKIs. The presence of baseline T315I mutation was confirmed in all Pts. Baseline clonal evolution was evident in 10 (25%) CP, 6 (38%) AP, and 7 (70%) BP Pts. Eight CP Pts entered the study in CHR. The median follow-up for all Pts was 6.4 mo (0.2 to 29.6). Efficacy: In CP Pts, CHR was achieved in 26 Pts and maintained in 8 Pts for an overall CHR rate of 85%; the median duration of CHR was 7.7+ mo (1.7 to 23.6). Overall cytogenetic response was 27.5% with 6 (15%) Pts achieving a major cytogenetic response (MCyR, 4 complete, 2 partial). The median duration of MCyR was 6+ mo (0.8 to 16.1). Major molecular response was achieved in 15% of Pts and a reduction of baseline T315I mutated clone occurred in 56.7% of CP Pts. In AP Pts, overall hematologic response was achieved in 6 (37.5%) Pts with 5 CHR and 1 return to chronic phase (RCP). Median duration of response was 3.9+ mo (1.7 to 14.8). One AP Pt achieved a complete cytogenetic response; duration 1.9+ mo. In BP Pts, overall hematologic response was achieved in 3 (30%) Pts with 2 CHR and 1 RCP. The median overall survival for CP Pts has not been reached and 35 (88%) Pts were alive at the time of data cut- off. The median overall survival was 18.8 mo for AP and 1.8 mo for BP Pts. Median time to progression was 11.2, 3.1, and 1.2 mo for CP, AP, and BP Pts, respectively. Safety: Grade 3/4 related events occurred in 45 of 66 (68%) Pts. The most commonly reported events were thrombocytopenia (58%), anemia (36%) and neutropenia (33%). Non-hematologic toxicities were primarily grade 1/2 with the most frequently reported events of diarrhea (44%), fatigue (35%), pyrexia (32%), nausea (26%), and asthenia (21%). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon with no events occurring in >5% of Pts and infection (3%) the most common event. Treatment delays occurred in approximately 50% of the Pts with median duration of approximately 12 days for all disease phases and cycles (CP=12, AP=10, and BP=12 days). The primary causes of delay were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and pancytopenia. Sixteen deaths occurred during the study (5 CP, 4 AP, and 7 BP).Three deaths (1 CP, 1 AP, and 1 BP) were considered to have a possible relationship to omacetaxine: sepsis, pancytopenia, and sudden death with unknown cause, respectively. Conclusions: Omacetaxine administered by subcutaneous injection produces durable hematologic and cytogenetic responses with a safety profile consisting mainly of hematologic toxicities. Omacetaxine may provide a treatment option for this patient population who currently has no available approved drug therapies. Disclosures: Cortes-Franco: ChemGenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Khoury:ChemGenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nicolini:ChemGenex: Research Funding. Corm:ChemGenex: Research Funding. Lipton:ChemGenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jones:ChemGenex: Research Funding. Hochhaus:ChemGenex: Research Funding. Craig:ChemGenex: Employment. Benichou:ChemGenex: Employment. Humphriss:ChemGenex: Employment. Kantarjian:ChemGenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Use of Erythropoietic-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) with Ruxolitinib in Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF), and Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (PET-MF).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2838.2838 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2838-2838 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Mary Frances McMullin ◽

Claire N Harrison ◽

Dietger Niederwieser ◽

Hilde Demuynck ◽

Nadja Jakel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Spleen Size ◽

Epoetin Alfa ◽

Spleen Volume ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2838 Background: Ruxolitinib (rux), a potent oral JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, has demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life in 2 phase 3 COMFORT studies in MF patients (pts). Consistent with rux's known mechanism of action, anemia was one of the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) and was generally transient and manageable leading to discontinuation in only 1 pt. In clinical practice, anemia can be managed with ESAs, which promote red blood cell proliferation via cytokine receptors that signal through the JAK pathway. Because these agents act upstream of rux in the JAK2 pathway, it is important to determine the effects of these medications on the safety and efficacy of rux. This post hoc analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of rux in pts receiving concomitant ESA in COMFORT-II. Methods: COMFORT-II is an open-label, randomized, multicenter study. Pts were randomized (2:1) to receive rux 15 or 20 mg bid or best available therapy (BAT; as selected by the investigator). Use of ESAs (eg, darbepoetin alfa, epoetin alfa, epoetin nos), although not prohibited, was discouraged for pts randomized to rux because ESAs can increase spleen size, which could confound efficacy analyses. Spleen volume was assessed by MRI or CT every 12 wk. The rate of transfusions was calculated as the number of units transfused per exposure duration (typically 12 wk). Results: Concomitant use of ESA was reported for 13 (PMF, n = 10; PET-MF, n = 2; PPV-MF, n = 1) of the 146 pts who were treated with rux (darbepoetin alfa, 2% [n = 3]; epoetin alfa, 6% [n = 9]; epoetin nos, < 1% [n = 1]). The median exposure to rux was similar for pts who received an ESA (+ESA group; 500 d) vs those who did not receive ESA (468 d), and the median dose intensity of rux was the same for each group (30 mg/d). As shown in the table, 8 pts (62%) had no change, 2 pts (15%) had a decrease, and 3 pts (23%) had an increase in the rate of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions per mo after the first administration of ESA compared with 12 wk before ESA use. Six wk prior to the first administration of ESA, 10/13 pts (77%) had grade 3/4 hemoglobin abnormalities; however, 6 wk after the administration of ESA, most pts' conditions improved to grade 2 (7/13 [54%]). The majority of pts (77%) did not have any change in their reticulocyte counts within the 6 wk before and after the administration of ESA; 1 pt (8%) had a marked increase; for 2 pts (15%), the data were not available. The AEs reported in pts who received ESA were similar to those previously reported with rux. Serious AEs were reported for 8 pts in the +ESA group (3 events in 2 pts that were possibly related to study drug). Within the last assessment prior to and the first assessment after the first administration of ESA, 7/9 evaluable pts (78%) had spleen volume reductions. Conclusions: In this analysis, although the sample size is small, rux was generally well tolerated in pts who received ESA, and the tolerability profile of rux was similar to that reported in previous studies. Rux-treated pts who received ESA generally did not have any change in their transfusion rates, but the rate of grade 3/4 hemoglobin abnormalities decreased within 6 wk of the first administration of ESA, suggesting that the use of ESA in combination with rux was beneficial in some pts. ESA did not appear to affect the efficacy of rux concerning spleen size reduction. The use of ESA for the treatment of anemia is common in clinical practice, and further analyses in combination with rux in this pt population are warranted. Disclosures: McMullin: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Recher:Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, travel to ASH, travel to ASH Other; sunesis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Gisslinger:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Al- Ali:Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Updated Preliminary Results of a Phase 1b Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of Tirabrutinib Alone or in Combination with Idelalisib or Entospletinib in Patients with Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113111 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3135-3135 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alexey V Danilov ◽

Charles Herbaux ◽

Martin J.S. Dyer ◽

Peter Hillmen ◽

Simon Rule ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels ◽

Common Teaes

Abstract Introduction: Tirabrutinib (TIRA; GS/ONO-4059) is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Idelalisib (IDELA), a first-in-class phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of CLL. Entospletinib (ENTO) is a selective inhibitor of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK). All three have single agent activity in CLL and updated results from TIRA monotherapy and the combinations of TIRA+IDELA and TIRA+ENTO from this ongoing phase 1b study (NCT02457598) are reported here. Methods: Patients with previously treated CLL and no prior exposure to targeted inhibitors were eligible for enrollment. For the TIRA+IDELA combination, patients were treated with dose levels in a 3+3 approach combining either idelalisib 50 mg BID or 100mg QD and TIRA ranging from 20mg to 80mg QD. For the TIRA+ENTO combination, patients were treated with entospletinib at either 200mg or 400mg QD and tirabrutinib ranging from 40mg to 80mg QD in dose levels with a 3+3 approach. TIRA monotherapy was with 80mg QD. Results: As of March 5, 2018, total of 50 CLL patients have been enrolled, 26 patients in the TIRA monotherapy group, 14 in the TIRA + IDELA group, and 10 patients in the TIRA + ENTO group. The median number of prior therapies is 1 (range 1-6). No MTD was identified for either combination at the doses evaluated and activity was high at all dose levels. For the 25 patients who have received at least one dose of TIRA monotherapy, the median duration of treatment is 28 weeks (range 0.3-54.1), and 22 patients are still on treatment. All 12 patients evaluable for response per IWCLL2008 criteria achieved a partial response on study with best overall response shown in table 1. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were reported in 92% patients, with 28% having a ≥grade 3 TEAE. The most common TEAEs (any grade/≥grade 3) were diarrhoea (24%/0), constipation (20%/0), neutropenia (16%/12%), contusion (12%/0), asthenia (12%/0), ecchymosis (12%/0), and nausea (12%/0). AEs led to treatment interruption in 3 patients and discontinuation in 2 patients and there were no deaths in this group on study. For the 14 patients in the TIRA+IDELA group, the median duration of treatment is 100 weeks (range 36-134.9), and 11 patients are still on treatment. 12/13 evaluable patients achieved a response on study with best overall response shown in table 1. TEAEs were reported in all patients with 64% of patients having a ≥grade 3 TEAE. The most common TEAEs (any grade/≥grade 3) were diarrhoea (43%/7%), neutropenia (36%/36%), bronchitis (36%/0), rash (36%/0), back pain (29%/0), dyspepsia (29%/0), nausea (29%/0), cough (29%/0), constipation (29%/0), arthralgia (29%/0), pruritus (29%/0). AEs led to interruption or discontinuation of all study treatment in 5 and 1 patients, respectively. One patient died due to sudden respiratory difficulty not believed to be related to study treatment. For the 10 patients in the TIRA+ENTO group, the median duration of treatment is 82 weeks (range 57.1-93.9) and all patients are still on treatment. All patients achieved a partial response on study with best overall response shown in table 1. TEAEs were reported in all patients with 60% having a ≥grade 3 TEAE. The most common TEAEs (any grade/≥grade 3) were contusion (50%/0), fatigue (50%/0), diarrhoea (40%/0), upper respiratory tract infection (40%/10%), rhinitis (30%/0), alanine aminotransferase increased (30%/10%), cough (30%/0), and dyspepsia (30%/0%). AEs led to interruption or discontinuation of all study treatment in 4 and 0 patients respectively. Conclusion: Tirabrutinib in combination with idelalisib or entospletinib at the doses evaluated was tolerable with no significant potentiation of already characterized side effects from the single agents such as bleeding, diarrhea or cytopenias. Both combinations showed a high level of activity in CLL and are currently being evaluated in Phase 2 studies. Disclosures Danilov: Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding. Herbaux:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dyer:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hillmen:Celgene: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rule:Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Huang:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Mitra:Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Employment. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Fegan:Napp: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous-Administered Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients Who Are Resistant or Intolerant to Two or More Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors – Results of A Multicenter Phase 2/3 Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.861.861 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 861-861 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Jorge Cortes-Franco ◽

Digumarti Raghunadharao ◽

Purvish Parikh ◽

Meir Wetzler ◽

Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 861 Background: Omacetaxine is a first-in-class cetaxine with clinical activity against Ph+ CML and a mechanism of action independent of tyrosine kinase inhibition. The development of TKI resistance and intolerance is an emerging problem and patients (Pts) who have failed multiple TKIs may benefit from an alternative therapy for CML. Study Goals: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SC omacetaxine in CML Pts who are resistant and/or intolerant to two or more TKIs. Methods: Eligible Pts included adult CML Pts in chronic, accelerated, or blast disease phase (CP, AP, BP) with resistance and/or intolerance to at least two TKIs. Bcr-Abl mutational analysis was performed at one of 2 central reference laboratories and Pts harboring the T315I Bcr-Abl mutation were enrolled in a separate clinical trial. Induction schedule: 1.25 mg/m2 SC omacetaxine twice daily for 14 days every 28 days until hematologic response. Maintenance dosing: 1.25 mg/m2 SC omacetaxine twice daily for 7 days every 28 days. Study Results: To date, 99 Pts have enrolled, with data available for analysis on 65 Pts (30 CP, 20 AP and 15 BP). The median age was 57 yrs (23-78) with 52% male and a median disease duration of 77 mo (1-197). Nearly all (64/65, 99%) Pts failed prior IM therapy and 57% failed 3 or more prior TKIs. Baseline mutations were identified in 21 (32%) Pts with 10 non-P Loop, 7 P Loop and 4 compound mutations. Baseline clonal evolution was evident in 5 (17%) CP, 8 (40%) AP, and 13 (87%) BP Pts. Six CP Pts entered the study in CHR. The median follow-up for all Pts is 4.0 mo (0.3 to 14.7). Efficacy: In CP Pts, CHR was achieved in 18 Pts and maintained for more than 8 weeks in the 6 Pts enrolled with baseline CHR, for an overall CHR rate of 80%; median duration 4.7+ mo (1.4 to 13). Major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 6 (20%) CP Pts (1 complete, 5 partial); median duration 1.6+ mo (0.0 to 2.9). Major molecular response was achieved in 10% of CP Pts. In AP Pts, overall hematologic response was achieved in 15 (75%) Pts; 12 CHR and 3 return to chronic phase (RCP); median duration 2.5+ mo (1.8 to 10.5). One (5%) AP Pt achieved a complete CyR, identified immediately prior to data cut-off and ongoing. In BP Pts, overall hematologic response was achieved in 8 (53.3%); 6 CHR and 2 RCP. Three Pts (2 CP, 1 AP) received bone marrow/stem cell transplants after achieving major cytogenetic response, a therapeutic option not available to them at study enrollment. No deaths occurred in CP Pts. The median overall survival for AP Pts has not been reached and 13 Pts were alive at the time of data cut-off. Median overall survival was 14.5 mo for BP Pts. Median time to progression was 11.1, 5.7, and 2.6 mo for CP, AP, and BP Pts, respectively. Safety: Grade 3/4 related events occurred in 47/65 (72%) of Pts. The most commonly reported events (>15%) were thrombocytopenia (43%), neutropenia (29%), and anemia (22%). Non-hematologic toxicities were generally grade 1/2 with the most frequently reported; diarrhea (32%), nausea (26%), pyrexia (23%), headache (20%), fatigue (19%), vomiting (17%), and asthenia (17%). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon with no events occurring in >5% of Pts and fatigue (3%) the most common event. Treatment delays occurred in approximately 50% of the Pts with median duration of approximately 9 days for all disease phases and cycles (CP=7, AP=11, and BP=12 days). The primary causes of delay were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia and pancytopenia. Deaths occurred in 6 (9.2%) Pts, including 2 (10%) AP pts and 4 (26.7%) BP Pts. Of the deaths, one occurrence in an AP Pt was considered to be possibly related to omacetaxine treatment (febrile neutropenia). Conclusions: Omacetaxine administered by SC injection produced hematologic and cytogenetic responses with a safety profile primarily consisting of hematologic toxicities. This study demonstrated that omacetaxine may be a potential treatment option for CML Pts who have failed multiple TKIs. Disclosures: Cortes-Franco: ChemGenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Raghunadharao:ChemGenex: Research Funding. Parikh:ChemGenex: Research Funding. Wetzler:ChemGenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lipton:ChemGenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jones:ChemGenex: Research Funding. Hochhaus:ChemGenex: Research Funding. Kantarjian:ChemGenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Craig:ChemGenex: Employment. Benichou:ChemGenex: Employment. Humphriss:ChemGenex: Employment. Nicolini:ChemGenex: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Updated Results of the Phase II Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD), Low Dose Dexamethasone (DEX) and Lenalidomide (LEN) In Patients with Newly Diagnosed (ND) Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3054.3054 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3054-3054

Author(s):

Rachid Baz ◽

Mohamad A Hussein ◽

Daniel Sullivan ◽

Jose-Leonel Ochoa-Bayona ◽

Monique A Hartley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3054 Background: We previously reported the interim results of a phase II trial of PLD, low dose DEX and LEN in patients with NDMM. After a median of 4 cycles, the overall response rate (ORR) was 71% with 50% of patients achieving VGPR or better (ASCO 2009 Ann Meeting Proc #8518). However, due to a high rate of grade 3/4 fatigue and neutropenia, a dose reduction in PLD was recommended in order to improve tolerance and avoid treatment interruption. We herein report the updated results of this combination. Methods: The first 29 patients received PLD (40 mg/m2 on day 1), DEX (40 mg on days 1–4) and LEN (25 mg Days 1–21) every 28 days (for 2 cycles beyond best response). Prophylactic low dose aspirin, acyclovir and fluoroquinolone were recommended. Patients not eligible or not wishing to proceed with high-dose therapy continued on the tolerated dose of LEN and DEX until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. PLD was reduced to 30 mg/m2 after the first 29 patients as described in background section. Results: Between 2/2008 and 7/2010, 47 of a planned 60 patients were enrolled. 3 patients were screen failures and are not included in subsequent analysis. The mean age was 63 years (36-78) and 53% were males. The median β2microglobulin was 2.8 mg/dL (21% had β2m>3.5). Using the IMWG criteria and after a median of 6 cycles of therapy, 5 patients had CR or sCR, 15 patients had VGPR, 14 patients had a PR, 6 patients had SD, 1 patient had PD, 3 patients were not evaluable (failure to complete 1 cycle of therapy for reasons other than PD). The overall response rate was 83% with 49% VGPR and better. For the cohort of patients treated after the dose reduction of PLD, the ORR was 88%, and VGPR and better was noted in 50%. In the patients treated with the reduced dose of PLD, no grade 4 toxicities were noted and the following grade 3 toxicities were noted: neutropenia (25%), fatigue (12.5%), infections (18%, only 1 patient had febrile neutropenia). No grade 3 or 4 venous thromboembolic events, anemia and thrombocytopenia were noted. This compares favorably with 48%, 10%, 7%, 21%, and 20% grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue and infections, respectively, in the 29 patients treated at the higher dose of PLD. 18 patients proceeded to high-dose therapy (median CD34+ 4.24×106, 8 patients had stem cell collection with GCSF alone, 8 with AMD3100, 2 with cyclophosphamide). 9 patients received maintenance therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Survival and progression free results remain immature. Conclusion: The combination of PLD, LEN and DEX is an active regimen in patients with NDMM. The dose reduction of PLD in this regimen resulted in better tolerance without a compromise in efficacy due to less frequent treatment interruptions. Disclosures: Baz: celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; millenium: Research Funding; orthobiotec: Research Funding. Off Label Use: use of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and lenalidomide in newly diagnosed myeloma rather than in relapsed or refractory myeloma. Hussein:celgene: Employment. Sullivan:Merck: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alsina:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Results Of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study (JAKARTA) Of The JAK2-Selective Inhibitor Fedratinib (SAR302503) In Patients With Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.393.393 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 393-393 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

Animesh Pardanani ◽

Claire N Harrison ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Francisco Cervantes ◽

Ruben A. Mesa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Selective Inhibitor ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Spleen Volume ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Double Blind ◽

Once Daily ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Fedratinib (SAR302503) is a JAK2-selective inhibitor that has provided clinically meaningful reductions in MF-associated splenomegaly and symptoms in Phase I and II studies (J Clin Oncol 2011;29:789. Haematologica 2013;98:S1113). Here, we present efficacy and safety data from the Phase III JAKARTA study of fedratinib versus placebo in patients with MF (NCT01437787). Methods In this international double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study, patients aged ≥18 years with IPSS intermediate-2 or high-risk MF, platelet count ≥50 × 109/L, and splenomegaly were randomized (1:1:1) to receive placebo or fedratinib 400 mg or 500 mg, orally, once daily, in consecutive 4-week cycles. Patients who received placebo were eligible to cross-over to fedratinib (randomized 1:1 to 400 mg or 500 mg) following 6 cycles of treatment, or prior to Cycle 6 if the patient had disease progression. The primary endpoint was spleen response rate (RR) (≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline measured by MRI or CT at Week 24, and confirmed 4 weeks later). Secondary endpoints included symptom RR (≥50% reduction in total symptom score from baseline at Week 24, measured through a daily electronic eDiary using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form [Cancer 2011;117:4869. Blood 2011;118:401]), and safety of fedratinib. Results A total of 289 patients were randomized: median age 65 years; 59% male; 63% primary MF; 48% high-risk MF; 67% JAK2V617F positive; 16% platelet count <100 × 109/L; median baseline spleen volume 2568 mL (range 316–8244); median baseline total symptom score 14.7 (0–57). Median (range) exposures for placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups were 24 (2–34), 30 (1–55) and 28 (1–60) weeks, respectively. Spleen RRs at Week 24 (placebo 1%; 400 mg 47%; 500 mg 49%), and confirmed at Week 28 (placebo 1%; 400 mg 36%; 500 mg 40%), were significantly (p<0.0001) higher in both fedratinib groups compared with placebo (Table). Nineteen patients had a spleen response at Week 24 not confirmed 4 weeks later (spleen reduction 25–35% [n=10]; image not available/evaluable [n=8]; image taken outside time window [n=1]). Spleen RRs by baseline platelet level are shown in the table. Patients treated with fedratinib had significantly (p<0.0001) greater improvements in MF symptoms compared with placebo (Table). The most common all grade non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was diarrhea (16%, 66% and 56% of patients in the placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively). Grade 3/4 diarrhea was reported in 5% of patients in both the 400 mg and 500 mg dose groups. The most common hematologic TEAE was anemia (any grade 91%, 99% and 98%; Grade 3/4 25%, 43% and 60% in the placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively). Rates of Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were 9% (placebo), 17% (400 mg), and 27% (500 mg). Incidences of Grade 3/4 liver function tests (placebo/400 mg/500 mg) were: bilirubin, 2%/2%/1%; ALT, 0%/3%/3%; and AST, 1%/2%/2%. Overall treatment discontinuation rates up to 24 weeks of treatment were 25% (placebo), 22% (400 mg) and 32% (500 mg). Twenty-five patients died during the study (10, 5 and 10 in the placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively); the most common causes of death: disease progression (placebo [n=5]; 400 mg [n=3]; 500 mg [n=4]) and adverse events (placebo [n=4]; 400 mg [n=1]; 500 mg [n=4]). Conclusions In this Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study of 289 MF patients, treatment with fedratinib 400 mg or 500 mg once-daily demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in splenic volume and MF-associated symptom burden versus placebo. Fedratinib had an acceptable safety profile, with the adverse events reported consistent with those observed in previous studies. This study was sponsored by Sanofi. Disclosures: Pardanani: Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, PharmaMar and JW Pharma: Clinical trial support Other. Harrison:Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, Celgene, SBio, Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis, Sanofi, Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, SBio, Gilead: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cortes:Incyte, Sanofi: Consultancy; Incyte, Sanofi: Research Funding. Cervantes:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis and Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Incyte, Genentech, Lilly, MS Pharma, Gilead: Research Funding. Jourdan:Sanofi: Honoraria. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Drummond:Sanofi, Novartis, Celgene: Honoraria; TargeGen, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi, Novartis, Celgene: Consultancy. Passamonti:Novartis, Celgene, Incyte, Sanofi, Roche: Honoraria. Neumann:Sanofi: Employment. Gao:Sanofi: Employment.

Download Full-text

KD025 for Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (cGVHD) - Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase 2a Study (KD025-208)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125986 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 872-872 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Madan Jagasia ◽

Amandeep Salhotra ◽

Carlos R. Bachier ◽

Behyar Zoghi, MD, PhD, FACP ◽

Aleksandr Lazaryan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Systemic Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Meaningful Improvement ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Reductions ◽

Fund Research

Introduction: cGVHD exhibits both autoimmune and fibrotic features across multiple organ systems. KD025 is an orally available Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase 2 (ROCK2) selective inhibitor that (1) decreases human T cell IL-21 and IL-17 secretion via STAT3, IRF4 and RORγt regulation; (2) increases percentages and function of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells via a STAT5-dependent mechanism; and (3) reverses established cGVHD in 2 distinct preclinical models. KD025 modulates the immune system by shifting the Th17/Treg balance towards homeostasis. Methods: KD025-208 enrolled 3 sequential cohorts (C) (C1: 200 mg QD, C2: 200 mg BID and C3: 400 mg QD) of patients (pts) with cGVHD after 1-3 prior lines of systemic therapy. Treatment is in 28-Day continuous cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is the overall response rate (ORR) as per 2014 NIH response criteria in the mITT population. Additional endpoints include duration of response (DOR), corticosteroid (CS) dose reductions, failure free survival (FFS) and Lee Symptom Scale (LSS) score. Results: 17, 16 and 21 pts were enrolled in C1, C2, and C3 between Sep-2016 and Mar-2018. Data as of 8-Mar-2019 are included, reflecting a median duration of follow up of 112, 97 and 64 weeks (wks), respectively. At enrollment, median age was 52 yrs, median time from cGVHD diagnosis to treatment was 20 mos, and patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy. 71% of patients were refractory to the last line of therapy prior to enrollment. 50% of pts had cGVHD in ≥4 organs. The median duration of treatment was 37, 33 and 39 wks, respectively. As of 30-Jun-2019, 24% of pts had received >18 months of KD025 therapy. 14 pts remain on KD025 treatment. Reasons for discontinuation included cGVHD progression (18), pt voluntary withdrawal (7), relapse of underlying disease (5), investigator decision (5), AE (3) and death (2). ORR (95% CI) was 65% (38%, 85%) in C1, 69% (41%, 89%) in C2, and 62% (38%, 82%) in C3, i.e. 65% (51%, 77%) across all 3 cohorts. Responses were achieved across key subgroups with ORRs of 62% (24/39) in pts with ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy, 70% (19/27) in pts with ≥4 organs involved and 60% (25/42) in pts with severe cGVHD. CRs were observed in all affected organs except lung; PRs were observed in lung. Responses were rapid, and often achieved within 8 wks, although 4/35 responses occurred after 24 wks. Of note, organs with fibrotic manifestations such as lungs, joints and eyes responded after 24 weeks in some pts. Responses were durable, with a Kaplan-Meier (K-M) median DOR of 34 weeks across all cohorts. 57% of responders sustained a response for ≥20 wks. The K-M median DOR was 34 wks in pts with ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy. FFS at 6, 12, 18 and 24 mos was 76%, 47%, 40% and 33%, respectively. Baseline median CS dose was 0.21 mg/kg/day of prednisone equivalent. During treatment with KD025, the median CS dose was reduced by 50%. 67% of pts reduced CS dose and 20% discontinued CS completely. The median CS dose reduction was 66% in responders and 25% in non-responders. 52% of pts reported a clinically meaningful improvement (≥7-point reduction) in LSS score during treatment with KD025 with a median time to improvement of 9 wks and a duration for responders of 21 wks. 63% of responders and 32% of non-responders reported a meaningful improvement in LSS score. KD025 was well tolerated with a median Relative Dose Intensity of 98%. Dose reductions/interruptions occurred in 21/54 pts; median duration of interruption was 8.5 days (range 3-20). AEs were consistent with those expected in cGVHD pts receiving CS. Common AEs were URI (35%), diarrhea (31%), nausea (31%), fatigue (30%), dyspnea (28%), increased LFTs (24%), and peripheral edema (22%). 63% had a Grade ≥3 AE; the most common was dyspnea (13%). <10% of pts experienced Grade 3 anemia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. SAEs were reported in 43%; none were considered related to KD025. Three pts discontinued KD025 due to possibly related AEs (C1: diarrhea, headache; C3: fatigue). No apparent increased risk of infection was observed. Three pts died on study (C3: relapse of leukemia; lung infection; cardiac arrest); none were considered related to KD025. Conclusions: Durable and clinically meaningful responses have been observed across all 3 cohorts. KD025 was well tolerated, allowing pts to remain on treatment and realize potential benefits of sustained therapy. Disclosures Jagasia: Kadmon: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding. Salhotra:Celgene: Other: Research Support; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Non paid consultant. Bachier:Viracyte: Consultancy; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Consultancy. Lazaryan:Kadmon: Consultancy. Weisdorf:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding. Green:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Employment. Schueller:Kadmon Corporation LLC: Employment. Huang:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Employment. Yang:Kadmon Corporation: Employment. Eiznhamer:Kadmon Corporation: Employment. Aggarwal:Kadmon Corporation, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blazar:Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics and BlueRock Therapeuetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kamon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Five Prime Therapeutics Inc: Co-Founder, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; RXi Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: Research Funding; Abbvie Inc: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Childrens' Cancer Research Fund: Research Funding; KidsFirst Fund: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: Co-Founder; BlueRock Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Incyte: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Kadmon: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Idelalisib for Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Retrospective Study from Spanish Lymphoma Group Geltamo (GELT-IDE-2018-02)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125921 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5249-5249

Author(s):

Juan-Manuel Sancho ◽

Olga García ◽

Pablo Mozas ◽

Santiago Mercadal ◽

Eva Donato ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Biological Variables ◽

Grade 3

Background and objective. Idelalisib is an oral inhibitor of the p110δ isoform of PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase) approved in Europe and USA as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) after 2 previous lines of therapy based on a phase 2 study (Gopal et al, N Eng J Med 2014). However, there are scarce data on the use of idelalisib in clinical practice (Eyre et al, Br J Haematol 2017). The objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy and toxicity of idelalisib in relapsed/refractory FL patients in clinical practice in Spanish hospitals of GELTAMO group (GELT-IDE-2018-02 Study). Patients and Methods. Retrospective study of relapsed/refractory FL patients treated with idelalisib as salvage therapy in clinical practice. Demographic and clinical and biological variables were analyzed at FL diagnosis and at the time of idelalisib therapy, as well as its efficacy and toxicity. Results. A total of 43 patients from 20 hospitals were included. At time of idelalisib therapy, median age was 63 years (range 44-83), number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (2-7), 42% (n=18) were refractory to last previous treatment and 42% (n=18) had received an autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT); 56% (n=24) had progressed in the first 24 months after FL diagnosis (POD24). Median duration of treatment with idelalisib at time of analysis was 8.1 months (1.1-37.4) and 28/43 patients (65%) discontinued therapy, 13 due to progression, 12 due to adverse events (AE) and 3 due to physician's decision. Overall response rate (ORR) was 73% (32% CR) and median PFS 14.6 months (95% CI 0-32.2), with a trend to be higher in non-POD24 group (median PFS of 9.4 months [95% CI 1.7-16.9] in POD24 vs. 27 months [95% CI NA] in non-PO24 patients, p=0.082); median duration of response to idelalisib was 25.1 months (95% CI 13.1-37.6). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis, with a 2-year OS of 74% (95% CI 58%-90%) (Figure). In 4 patients, an allogeneic SCT was performed after idelalisib. A total of 86% (n=37) of patients showed any AE, being in 56% (n=24) of grade ≥3 AE. Toxicities of grade ≥3 more frequent were: neutropenia (23% of patients), diarrhea (23%), infections (23%: pneumonia in 4 patients, CMV infection in 2, febrile neutropenia in 1 and other infections in 3 [1 of them died due to Aspergillus infection]), and increased transaminases (9%). Conclusions. In this series of patients with relapsed/refractory FL, several previous lines of therapies and factors associated with poor prognosis, the treatment with idelalisib was associated with efficacy and toxicity similar to published studies. These results support the use of idelalisib as an option for FL patients with multiple or poor risk relapses. Financial support: Gilead Figure. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with follicular lymphoma treated with idelalisib. Figure Disclosures Sancho: SERVIER: Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JANSSEN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GILEAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELLTRION: Consultancy; Kern-Pharma: Honoraria; Sandoz: Consultancy. Lopez Jimenez:GILEAD SCIENCES: Honoraria, Other: Education funding. Ramirez Payer:GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Cordoba:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; FUNDACION JIMENEZ DIAZ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: Employment; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Martín:Kiowa Kirin: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; iQone: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses. Armando:Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text