Analysis of Outcome after Autologous Stem Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: Comparison of Different Induction Regimens.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3079-3079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) improves survival in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). We have previously demonstrated that the degree of response at transplant does not impact on the outcome of transplant. However, newer induction regimens such as thalidomide and dexamethasone (Thal-Dex) result in higher response rates compared to previously used regimens such as single agent dexamethasone or vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD). We examined the outcome of SCT following three different induction therapies for newly diagnosed MM, namely VAD, single agent Dex, and Thal-Dex. Patients and Methods: 340 patients with MM who received their SCT within 12 mos of diagnosis (median 5.8, range 3–12) were studied. Patients receiving more than one induction therapy as well as those in whom thalidomide was added to dexamethasone for lack of response were excluded from the analysis. There were 105 pts in the VAD group, 140 in the Dex group and 95 in the Thal-Dex group. Responses were defined using standard criteria. Results: The study cohort consisted of 209 males (59%), with a median age of 57 years (range 30–76) at transplant. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 3 groups, except for lower age in the VAD group (median 55.8) compared to Dex (59.6) and Thal Dex (57.4) and shorter time to transplant in the Dex group (5.4 m) compared to VAD (6.4) and Thal Dex (5.9). Markers of disease activity pre-transplant, including B2M and marrow plasma cell percentage were higher in the Dex group compared to either VAD or Thal Dex. The proportion of patients with any response to induction therapy was lower in the Dex group compared to the other two. All pts in the Dex and the Thal-Dex groups received melphalan only conditioning compared to 70% in the VAD group, the rest receiving Melphalan/TBI. An objective response was achieved after SCT in 96%, 97%, and 98% of pts in the VAD, Dex and Thal-Dex groups respectively (P=0.8). A complete response to SCT was seen in 49% of patients in VAD group, 45% among those in the Dex group and 38% among those in the Thal Dex group (P=0.38). There was no difference in the median progression free survival after transplant (P=0.21) or overall survival from diagnosis (P=.34) between the three groups. The proportion free from progression at 2 years post transplant was 54%, 55% and 46% for Dex, VAD and Thal-Dex respectively. The proportion surviving at 4 years from diagnosis was 64%, 65.4% and 72% respectively for the three groups. Conclusion: We did not observe any difference in the response rates including complete responses to SCT in the three groups with nearly all pts in each group achieving a response. The progression free survival and overall survival appear to be comparable between the three groups. The results from initial therapy cannot be compared between the three regimens since the study population is restricted to patients reaching stem cell transplant. Within the limits of the study, there does not appear to be any long term impact of the initial therapy for the patients going onto an early stem cell transplant. Figure Figure

Stem Cell Transplant in Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Response Failure in the Era of Novel Therapies.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1878-1878
Author(s):  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
David Dingli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Novel Agent

Abstract Abstract 1878 Poster Board I-900 Autologous stem cell transplant as a platform for multiple myeloma treatment is the standard of care for patients who can safely withstand the procedure. Before novel agents were introduced, one-third to one-half of patients did not achieve partial response at transplant. Previously published medical literature has showed that in this past era, absence of initial response to induction therapy had no impact on progression-free survival and overall survival after high-dose therapy. Lack of response to initial induction did not preclude a good response after stem cell transplant. With the introduction of novel agents—immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors—response rates with initial therapy are now between 70% and 100%. This retrospective study analyzes progression-free survival and overall survival in patients who do not have a partial response after induction therapy with a regimen that contains a novel agent. Unlike patients in reports published previously—before novel agents—patients who do not achieve partial remission have a significantly shorter overall survival from transplant (74.0 vs 43.5 months) and a shorter progression-free survival (22.6 vs 13.1 months; P<.001). Absence of a response to induction therapy with a novel agent predicts a poorer outcome after high-dose therapy.{abstabft}.b CR+VGPR for plateau, P<.001 compared with other 3 categories. Failure to respond to novel-agent induction leads to shorter posttransplant progression-free survival (PFS). Failure to respond to novel-agent induction leads to shorter posttransplant overall survivalDisclosures: Gertz: celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar: celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lacy: celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria.TableMultivariable Analysis of Posttransplant Progression-Free SurvivalVariableP ValuePlateau vs relapsed-refractory.003Albumin.86Sex.94b2-Microglobulin.89Bone marrow plasma cells.18Age.75Abnormal cytogenetics.002CTX mobilization.51Labeling index.002

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Chemorefractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4554-4554
Author(s):  
Catherine Garnett ◽  
Chrissy Giles ◽  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Maialen Lasa ◽  
Holger W. Auner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4554 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma, resulting in improved survival and response rate compared to conventional chemotherapy. Disease relapse, however, remains almost inevitable and thus the role of two successive (tandem) autologous stem cell transplants has been evaluated in chemorefractory patients as a means of prolonging duration of disease response. We retrospectively analysed the results of nine patients with chemorefractory disease treated at a single UK institution who received tandem ASCT between January 1998 and February 2009. There were six men and three women. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 42–65 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgG in eight patients and IgA in one patient. Median serum paraprotein level was 41g/L (range 12–73g/L) at presentation. At time of 1st transplant six patients were in stable disease (SD) and three had evidence of progressive disease. Conditioning melphalan dose was 140mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 110mg/m2 and 200mg/m2. Median time between transplants was 3.7 months (range 2.3–6.4 months) with PR and SD being observed in 2/9 and 7/9 patients at time of 2nd transplant. None of the patients reached complete response (CR). One patient received melphalan 140mg/m2 prior to 2nd transplant. The remaining patients received melphalan 200mg/m2. Median follow up after tandem transplant was 54.3 months (range 15.6 –143.6 months). No treatment related mortality was reported. At the time of analysis, six patients were still alive and under follow up with an overall survival (OS) figure for the group of 52% at 10 years from diagnosis (Figure 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 20 months from 2nd transplant (range 6.7–62.6 months) (Figure 2). Tandem autologous stem cell transplant in chemorefractory patients has resulted in overall survival similar to autologous stem cell transplant in chemosensitive patients and should be considered in patients with chemorefractory disease. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 2: Progression free survival following tandem transplant Figure 2:. Progression free survival following tandem transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Short Progression Free Survival Post Non-Myeloablative Sibling Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantion for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4323-4323
Author(s):  
Kevin Song ◽  
Heather J. Sutherland ◽  
John D. Shepherd ◽  
Yasser Abou Mourad ◽  
Michael J Barnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Abstract 4323 Introduction Allogeneic stem cell transplant has been considered the only potentially curative treatment for patients with myeloma. Due to the high treatment related mortality associated with myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation, non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantion is being investigated. Methods Between May 2003 and June 2008, 23 patients received a non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant (NMT) using a fully matched sibling as the donor. All had received a previous autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). 17 received the NMT as a part of a planned tandem transplant post ASCT. Six received the NMT after relapse post ASCT. Conditioning chemotherapy was a combination of cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2 daily x 2 days and Fludarabine 25mg/m2 daily for 5 days. Survival was measured from the date of allogeneic stem cell infusion. Results Median age at NMT was 52 years. Eight were female. Immunoglobulin isotype was 13 IgG; 5 IgA; 1 IgD; 4 light chain. ISS stage was 10 – stage 1; 8 – stage 2; 3- stage 3; 2 – insufficient information. 9/21 had del 13q; 3/9 t (4;14); 1/7 del 17p. Disease status at the time of NMT were 5 CR/nCR, 11 PR, 1 SD, 3 relapse chemo-sensitive, 3 relapse chemo-resistant. Median follow-up is 29 months (7 – 65 months). Median event free survival (EFS) for all patients is 17 months (95 % CI 8-26 months). Median EFS for the 17 patients who received NMT as a part of a planned tandem procedure was 18 months. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients is 29 months (95% CI unable to calculate). At the time of analysis 17 patients remain alive. Five patients are alive in continuous remission at a median of 40.9 months from NMT (13.5-47.6 months). Twelve patients have active disease requiring treatment. Three patients have died of myeloma, one of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and two of other causes. Nineteen patients (83%) developed GVHD at some time post-transplant. Of 14 patients who have relapsed, eleven patients had GVHD at the time of relapse. Of the 6 patient who received the NMT after relapse post ASCT, 5 have relapsed post NMT and one died of GVHD within 9 months. Conclusion Non-myeloablative sibling allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloma produces short progression free survival in-spite of the presence of graft-versus-host-disease and only a limited number of patients benefit. Patient who receive this treatment after relapse from prior autologous stem cell transplant do particularly poorly. Improved overall survival is primary due to improvements in post-relapse myeloma therapy.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Provides Additional Cytoreduction Following Induction Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3099-3099
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Suzanne Hayman ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Clinical Records

Abstract Background: High dose therapy (HDT) and stem cell transplant has been shown to improve survival in patients with myeloma and remains the standard of care. However, the reported results of initial HDT in these patients reflect the combined effect of the initial therapy and the HDT. The contribution of HDT on its own is often difficult to analyze in this group of patients with varying degree of response to initial therapy. In this single institution retrospective study, we have analyzed the results of HDT in a group of patients with measurable disease at the time of HDT. Methods: We identified patients from our transplant database, who had measurable disease at the time of initiation of transplant as defined by a serum M protein of ≥ 1.0 g/dL, 24 hour urine M-protein ≥ 200 mg or a bone marrow plasma cell % of ≥ 30. Details regarding the clinical outcome were obtained from the database and from patient clinical records. Chi square test was used for comparison of nominal variables and t-test for continuous variables. Kaplan Meier analysis was used for comparing survival and Cox proportional hazards was employed to identify predictors of progression free and overall survival. Responses were defined by the EBMTR criteria, using the measurements at the time HDT and the lowest measurement obtained. VGPR required a 90% reduction in the serum M component with urine protein &lt; 100 mg/24 hours. Results: A total of 440 patients were studied; 271 (61.5%) of whom had a transplant within one year of their diagnosis. Among the 271 patients, 140 (52%) were in the initial plateau, 99 (36%) failed to achieve a PR to initial therapy and 32 (12%) were in their first relapse. Given the known differences in the outcome between these groups of patients, those receiving an early transplant were analyzed separately. The response rates included CR (24%), VGPR (7%), PR (52%), MR or less (17%) and among the late transplants CR (23%), VGPR (8%), PR (61%) and MR or less (8%). The median progression free survival was 23.6 mos and the overall survival from HDT was 62 mos. In a multivariate analysis, presence of cytogenetic abnormalities (RR: 2.5) and high plasma cell labeling index (≥ 1%) (RR: 2.4) at HDT and failure to achieve a CR or VGPR (RR: 1.7) were prognostic for decreased progression free survival post HDT. In a similar model, only high PCLI (RR: 2.8) and abnormal cytogenetics (RR: 2.5) at HDT predicted for poor overall survival after transplant. Conclusion: This study provides a sense of the contribution of HDT, independent of the initial therapy, by determining responses based on the immediate pre-transplant disease measurements and the best values observed post transplant. In this group of patients with residual measurable disease after the initial therapy, HDT therapy leads to complete responses in nearly a quarter of the patients and a VGPR in another 7%, an outcome associated with better progressin free survival. While measurements at transplant do not correlate strictly with response to initial therapy, the aim of this study was to understand the individual contribution of HDT in these patients. Thus some of the patients who would have been classified as having a partial response to induction and HDT may be classified as non-responders in this analysis. These numbers will provide a historical comparison for trials evaluating novel consolidation therapies for myeloma.

Salvage Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplant with Consolidation for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5497-5497
Author(s):  
Kamal Kant Singh Abbi ◽  
Sonya Behrends ◽  
Margarida Silverman ◽  
Umar Farooq ◽  
Kalyan Nadiminti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Therapeutic options for patients with Multiple myeloma (MM) whose disease has relapsed after a prior autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) include an expanding armamentarium of novel agents, often combined with traditional chemotherapy, or a second SCT, with no clear standard of care. Upfront tandem transplantation has been shown to improve both progression free survival and overall survival. But currently, there is little data regarding the application of tandem SCT in relapsed multiple myeloma patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients who underwent salvage melphalan-based tandem SCT for relapsed MM at University of Iowa Hospitals and clinics. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from date of the first salvage SCT to disease progression or death, whereas overall survival (OS) was defined from the date of the first salvage SCT to the date of death from any cause. Results: Between 2012 and 2015, 12 patients with MM received tandem autograft (total 24 transplants) for relapsed disease at our center. Conditioning was with VDT-melphalan 200mg/m2 (21/24), VDT-MEL 140mg/m2 (2/24) and Velcade, gemcitabine, BCNU, melphalan and dexamethasone (1/24). The median age at the salvage SCT was 48 years (range 37-58); 7 patients were female. 17% had high risk cytogenetics (including t(4;14), +1q, p53 loss) at the time of salvage SCT. Median time between previous transplant and progression of disease was 34 months (range 8-108). Of the 7 patients, who received re-induction therapy, 71% had chemotherapy refractory disease prior to salvage SCT. Response was assessed at 2-3 months post-SCT. Overall response rate was 92%. 7/12 (58%) patients achieved stringent complete remission, one patient achieved CR, one patient achieved near CR, 2/12 patients achieved VGPR and 1/12 had stable disease (SD). Following salvage tandem SCT, all patients received consolidation therapy with three drug combination, intended to be given for two years. Three patients have shown progressive disease at the time of analysis. The median PFS was 390 days (range 265- 1085) (Table-1); the median OS was 517 days (range 338-1085) (Table-2). Rate of progression free survival in the 10 evaluable patients at one year was 80%. There was no transplant related mortality. One patient died of progressive disease. Conclusions: Salvage tandem SCT is an effective strategy for relapsed MM and is especially effective in patients who had received less intensive therapy initially (single transplant and no maintenance therapy). Incorporation of novel agents (monoclonal antibodies and high doses of carfilzomib) into maintenance strategies may further improve outcomes. Figure 1. Progression free survival for all the patients Figure 1. Progression free survival for all the patients Figure 2. Overall survival for all the patients Figure 2. Overall survival for all the patients Disclosures Farooq: Kite Pharma: Research Funding.

Early versus delayed autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients receiving induction therapy with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8540-8540
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Nooka ◽  
Amelia A. Langston ◽  
Edmund K. Waller ◽  
Leonard T. Heffner ◽  
Charise Gleason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

8540 Background: Lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVD) is an active, tolerable induction regimen with superior response rates (≥VGPR rates of 80%) in newly diagnosed MM pts. However, the optimal timing of ASCT with this triplet combination is uncertain. We have evaluated our institutional experience to provide an insight for the best timing of ASCT, where specific patients were offered delayed ASCT based on risk, response and toxicity of therapy. Methods: 222 consecutive transplant-eligible pts with newly diagnosed MM that received at least 3 cycles of RVD and harvested stem cells were included in the analysis from May 2007 until October 2011. Patients underwent early ASCT (received planned ASCT immediately after stem cell harvest, n=136) or delayed transplant (received planned maintenance therapy after collection with intent to proceed with ASCT at first relapse, n=86). Results: Median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis is 60.5 yrs (32-77) vs. 60 yrs (22-73) for early vs. delayed groups. ISS stage 3 disease was seen in 31% patients and 10% patients; high risk cytogenetics were seen in 11% and 7% patients in early vs. delayed groups, respectively. Median time from initiation of induction therapy to ASCT in early group is 5.45 months (range, 3.19-12.68 months). In the delayed SCT group, 28 patients underwent ASCT at a median time of 26.21 months (range, 13.67-41.72 months) from initiation of therapy. At a median follow up of 32 months, 5-year overall survival from diagnosis was 68% and 88% in patients undergoing early and delayed ASCT, respectively (p = 0.106). Conclusions: Transplantation-eligible patients who receive RVD as initial therapy followed by early vs. delayed ASCT result in comparable overall survival. In carefully selected newly diagnosed myeloma patients with lower ISS stage receiving RVD as induction therapy, planned delayed ASCT results in 5-year survival rates close to 90%.

scholarly journals Outcome of Hodgkin Lymphoma after Progression Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2994-2994
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Alina S Gerrie ◽  
Maryse M Power ◽  
Kerry J Savage
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Initial Diagnosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Clinical trials have demonstrated a high level of effectiveness for brentuximab vedotin (BV) for patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL); however, how patients fare in routine clinical practice if their HL recurs after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is less clear. Our primary objective was to characterize overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among a cohort of real-world patients treated with BV after ASCT. The secondary objective was to characterize the outcome of treatment after failure of ASCT or ASCT and BV. Methods We screened the population-based British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) Lymphoid Cancer Database to identify patients with classical HL (excluding lymphocyte predominant HL) who were aged >16 years at initial diagnosis, staged and treated in BC, had primary treatment with ABVD or equivalent chemotherapy, underwent ASCT as part of first treatment for refractory or relapsed disease and relapsed again after ASCT. We excluded patients who have been treated at any time with a checkpoint inhibitor. We determined Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from the date of the progression that occurred after ASCT and, for those treated with the agent, after subsequent BV. Therapies given in sequence without a pause between therapies were considered part of the same line of therapy. Results Between 1986 and 2015 93 patients experienced recurrence of HL after ASCT. Their median age at initial diagnosis was 30 years and 51% were male. After failure of ASCT 23 (25%) received radiation monotherapy and 61 received chemotherapy (66%), either as a single agent or in various combinations and of these 9 (10%) also received radiation; 6 (6%) received a second transplant (5 allogeneic and 1 repeat ASCT); and 5 refused or were too frail for treatment other than with corticosteroids. The median PFS and OS from the time of relapse after ASCT for these 93 patients were 7.1 (range 0.2-352) and 16.2 months (range 0.2-352), respectively. Of those 93, 17 patients received BV alone or BV+bendamustine at some point following ASCT. The median age of BV-treated patients was 33 years at the time of their original diagnosis and 29% were male. Among those 17 patients, 9 received single agent BV and 8, BV+bendamustine as part of a clinical trial. The median time from ASCT to the start of BV was 27.5 months. Counting ASCT as 2nd line treatment, 10 individuals received BV as 3rd line, 6 as 4th line and 1 as 5th line therapy. For all 17 patients the subsequent median PFS and OS from the time of BV initiation were 5.1 (range 1.5-34.6) and 18.8 months (range 2.4-40.5), respectively. 12 of these patients relapsed again and their subsequent median PFS and OS were 0.6 (range 0.5-29) and 3 (range 0.5-30) months, respectively. All 9 patients who received single agent BV relapsed again at a median of 2 months (range 1.2-9.7); 5 of the 8 patients treated with BV+bendamustine remain in remission 6 to 36 months later. Conclusions These data highlight the poor prognosis for patients with relapsed or refractory cHL, particularly for those whose lymphoma recurs after brentuximab vedotin as well as the highly individualized management of patients whose lymphoma has recurred after ASCT. Future therapies that prevent or significantly delay relapse will help in alleviate the substantial clinical burden due to relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Disclosures Connors: Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; NanoString Technologies: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding.

Second Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) as Salvage Therapy in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1217-1217
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
Sahar Zadeh ◽  
A. Keith Stewart ◽  
Christine Chen ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Free Interval ◽  
Ortho Biotech

Abstract Abstract 1217 Poster Board I-239 Background Single autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is considered the standard of care after induction therapy for younger multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). However, it is not curative and virtually all patients will ultimately relapse. As more options are available to treat relapsed disease, the role of a second ASCT as salvage therapy is unclear. Method Retrospective review of all MM pts who received a 2nd ASCT as salvage therapy at Princess Margaret Hospital. Results Between February 1997 and July 2009, 79 MM pts received a second ASCT for relapsed MM at our institution. Median age was 60 yrs (range 39-72) at second transplant. 48 pts (61%) were male. Immunoglobulin subtype included IgG (42), IgA (21), light chain (11), nonsecretory (3), IgM(1) and IgD (1). Transplant conditioning regimen for first transplant was high dose melphalan (MEL) 140-200 mg/m2 in 67, busulphan and cyclophosphamide in 1, and combinations of MEL with etoposide (E) or TBI in the rest. 2nd ASCT conditioning consisted of MEL alone in 76, the remaining 3 had MEL with either TBI or E. The median time to relapse after the first transplant was 2.72 years (0.81-8.26), with a median interval between transplants of 3.61 years (1.63-9.59). Response to first transplant in 78 evaluable patients was 13 CR/nCR (17%), 56 PR/VGPR (72%), 9 MR/SD (12%). Nineteen pts received maintenance therapy between transplants. Two transplant-related deaths occurred following 2nd ASCT. In 73 evaluable patients, response to second transplant was 11 CR/nCR (15%), 57 PR (78%), 6 MR/SD (8%). After 2nd ASCT, with median follow up 5.92 years (71 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.5 months and median overall survival (OS) was 4.4 years. Long term progression-free status based on the progression-free interval after 1st ASCT is summarized Table 1. PFS based on progression free interval after 1st ASCT is outlined in Figure 1. Conclusions 2nd ASCT is a feasible and safe salvage therapy in relapsed MM patients. It is effective in providing a median progression free survival of 18.5 months and median overall survival of 4.4 years (52.8 months) after 2nd ASCT. This is comparable if not better than modern salvage chemotherapies. The longer the disease free interval after 1st ASCT the more effective 2nd ASCT is at extending both progression free survival and overall survival. It is reasonable, therefore, to consider a 2nd ASCT if the time to progression is greater than 2 years after first ASCT. Disclosures Chen: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document