Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Provides Additional Cytoreduction Following Induction Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3099-3099
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Suzanne Hayman ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Clinical Records

Abstract Background: High dose therapy (HDT) and stem cell transplant has been shown to improve survival in patients with myeloma and remains the standard of care. However, the reported results of initial HDT in these patients reflect the combined effect of the initial therapy and the HDT. The contribution of HDT on its own is often difficult to analyze in this group of patients with varying degree of response to initial therapy. In this single institution retrospective study, we have analyzed the results of HDT in a group of patients with measurable disease at the time of HDT. Methods: We identified patients from our transplant database, who had measurable disease at the time of initiation of transplant as defined by a serum M protein of ≥ 1.0 g/dL, 24 hour urine M-protein ≥ 200 mg or a bone marrow plasma cell % of ≥ 30. Details regarding the clinical outcome were obtained from the database and from patient clinical records. Chi square test was used for comparison of nominal variables and t-test for continuous variables. Kaplan Meier analysis was used for comparing survival and Cox proportional hazards was employed to identify predictors of progression free and overall survival. Responses were defined by the EBMTR criteria, using the measurements at the time HDT and the lowest measurement obtained. VGPR required a 90% reduction in the serum M component with urine protein < 100 mg/24 hours. Results: A total of 440 patients were studied; 271 (61.5%) of whom had a transplant within one year of their diagnosis. Among the 271 patients, 140 (52%) were in the initial plateau, 99 (36%) failed to achieve a PR to initial therapy and 32 (12%) were in their first relapse. Given the known differences in the outcome between these groups of patients, those receiving an early transplant were analyzed separately. The response rates included CR (24%), VGPR (7%), PR (52%), MR or less (17%) and among the late transplants CR (23%), VGPR (8%), PR (61%) and MR or less (8%). The median progression free survival was 23.6 mos and the overall survival from HDT was 62 mos. In a multivariate analysis, presence of cytogenetic abnormalities (RR: 2.5) and high plasma cell labeling index (≥ 1%) (RR: 2.4) at HDT and failure to achieve a CR or VGPR (RR: 1.7) were prognostic for decreased progression free survival post HDT. In a similar model, only high PCLI (RR: 2.8) and abnormal cytogenetics (RR: 2.5) at HDT predicted for poor overall survival after transplant. Conclusion: This study provides a sense of the contribution of HDT, independent of the initial therapy, by determining responses based on the immediate pre-transplant disease measurements and the best values observed post transplant. In this group of patients with residual measurable disease after the initial therapy, HDT therapy leads to complete responses in nearly a quarter of the patients and a VGPR in another 7%, an outcome associated with better progressin free survival. While measurements at transplant do not correlate strictly with response to initial therapy, the aim of this study was to understand the individual contribution of HDT in these patients. Thus some of the patients who would have been classified as having a partial response to induction and HDT may be classified as non-responders in this analysis. These numbers will provide a historical comparison for trials evaluating novel consolidation therapies for myeloma.

Analysis of Outcome after Autologous Stem Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: Comparison of Different Induction Regimens.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3079-3079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) improves survival in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). We have previously demonstrated that the degree of response at transplant does not impact on the outcome of transplant. However, newer induction regimens such as thalidomide and dexamethasone (Thal-Dex) result in higher response rates compared to previously used regimens such as single agent dexamethasone or vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD). We examined the outcome of SCT following three different induction therapies for newly diagnosed MM, namely VAD, single agent Dex, and Thal-Dex. Patients and Methods: 340 patients with MM who received their SCT within 12 mos of diagnosis (median 5.8, range 3–12) were studied. Patients receiving more than one induction therapy as well as those in whom thalidomide was added to dexamethasone for lack of response were excluded from the analysis. There were 105 pts in the VAD group, 140 in the Dex group and 95 in the Thal-Dex group. Responses were defined using standard criteria. Results: The study cohort consisted of 209 males (59%), with a median age of 57 years (range 30–76) at transplant. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 3 groups, except for lower age in the VAD group (median 55.8) compared to Dex (59.6) and Thal Dex (57.4) and shorter time to transplant in the Dex group (5.4 m) compared to VAD (6.4) and Thal Dex (5.9). Markers of disease activity pre-transplant, including B2M and marrow plasma cell percentage were higher in the Dex group compared to either VAD or Thal Dex. The proportion of patients with any response to induction therapy was lower in the Dex group compared to the other two. All pts in the Dex and the Thal-Dex groups received melphalan only conditioning compared to 70% in the VAD group, the rest receiving Melphalan/TBI. An objective response was achieved after SCT in 96%, 97%, and 98% of pts in the VAD, Dex and Thal-Dex groups respectively (P=0.8). A complete response to SCT was seen in 49% of patients in VAD group, 45% among those in the Dex group and 38% among those in the Thal Dex group (P=0.38). There was no difference in the median progression free survival after transplant (P=0.21) or overall survival from diagnosis (P=.34) between the three groups. The proportion free from progression at 2 years post transplant was 54%, 55% and 46% for Dex, VAD and Thal-Dex respectively. The proportion surviving at 4 years from diagnosis was 64%, 65.4% and 72% respectively for the three groups. Conclusion: We did not observe any difference in the response rates including complete responses to SCT in the three groups with nearly all pts in each group achieving a response. The progression free survival and overall survival appear to be comparable between the three groups. The results from initial therapy cannot be compared between the three regimens since the study population is restricted to patients reaching stem cell transplant. Within the limits of the study, there does not appear to be any long term impact of the initial therapy for the patients going onto an early stem cell transplant. Figure Figure

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Chemorefractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4554-4554
Author(s):  
Catherine Garnett ◽  
Chrissy Giles ◽  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Maialen Lasa ◽  
Holger W. Auner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4554 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma, resulting in improved survival and response rate compared to conventional chemotherapy. Disease relapse, however, remains almost inevitable and thus the role of two successive (tandem) autologous stem cell transplants has been evaluated in chemorefractory patients as a means of prolonging duration of disease response. We retrospectively analysed the results of nine patients with chemorefractory disease treated at a single UK institution who received tandem ASCT between January 1998 and February 2009. There were six men and three women. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 42–65 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgG in eight patients and IgA in one patient. Median serum paraprotein level was 41g/L (range 12–73g/L) at presentation. At time of 1st transplant six patients were in stable disease (SD) and three had evidence of progressive disease. Conditioning melphalan dose was 140mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 110mg/m2 and 200mg/m2. Median time between transplants was 3.7 months (range 2.3–6.4 months) with PR and SD being observed in 2/9 and 7/9 patients at time of 2nd transplant. None of the patients reached complete response (CR). One patient received melphalan 140mg/m2 prior to 2nd transplant. The remaining patients received melphalan 200mg/m2. Median follow up after tandem transplant was 54.3 months (range 15.6 –143.6 months). No treatment related mortality was reported. At the time of analysis, six patients were still alive and under follow up with an overall survival (OS) figure for the group of 52% at 10 years from diagnosis (Figure 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 20 months from 2nd transplant (range 6.7–62.6 months) (Figure 2). Tandem autologous stem cell transplant in chemorefractory patients has resulted in overall survival similar to autologous stem cell transplant in chemosensitive patients and should be considered in patients with chemorefractory disease. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 2: Progression free survival following tandem transplant Figure 2:. Progression free survival following tandem transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Retrospective Single Center Comparison of Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF Versus G-CSF Alone for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Mobilisation Following First Line Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1898-1898
Author(s):  
Richard S Whitmill ◽  
David J Lewis ◽  
David John Sutton ◽  
Jahanzeb Khawaja ◽  
Georgina Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Absolute Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Neutropenic Sepsis ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Abstract Introduction Autologous transplantation is considered standard therapy for young and fit myeloma patients after initial therapy. Cyclophosphamide+ G-CSF is considered standard therapy for collection even though there is evidence for minimal anti-myeloma effect of cyclophosphamide, some increased short term toxicity and potential concerns regarding long term toxicity. There have been a few retrospective comparisons and one randomized study comparing cyclophosphamide based and G-CSF alone based PBSC collection. To our best knowledge they have not reported any impact in progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). We have compared here our myeloma patient cohort to explore these important endpoints. Patients and methods 89 patients (55 male and 34 female) who underwent first autologous transplant for myeloma between 2003 and 2010 were analysed in our study. Mobilization was with G-CSF alone in 45 patients (median age 58 yrs, range 38-70 yrs.) and cyclophosphamide and G-CSF in 44 (median age 58 yrs, range 41-74 yrs.). Cyclophosphamide was used at 3g/m2 and in both cases G-CSF used was lenogastrim at 10mcg/kg. There were 7 patients with ISS stage 3 in the G-CSF only group as compared to 10 in the Cyclophosphamide group. Prior chemotherapy was cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in majority of cases (n=55) with no difference across both groups. Data regarding high risk genetics and pre-transplant response was unavailable. We collected data progression free survival, overall survival, harvest dose and engraftment kinetics. Data was analyzed using SPSS and log rank test. Results The median dose of stem cells collected with G-CSF alone was 3.59×106 CD34 cells/kg (range 1.84-8.09) where as with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF it was 3.8×106 CD34 cells/kg (range 1.6-13). There was no difference in engraftment between the two groups with median neutrophil engraftment (Absolute neutrophil count>0.20×109/L) at day 14 and platelet engraftment (>50×109/L) at day 15 and 16 respectively. Progression free survival was significantly better in G-CSF alone cohort (46 months vs. 38 months, P=0.016) (fig. a) Overall survival was better in the GCSF only group as well (113 months vs. 75 months, P=0.029) (fig b). In the 17 high risk patients PFS was much better in the G-CSF group (60months vs. 22 months, P=0.02) (Fig c). There were 4 (9%) admissions in the cyclophosphamide group due to neutropenic sepsis as compared to none in the G-CSF group. Discussion Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF may be associated with slightly higher stem cell yields but this margin is becoming smaller and not significant in the era of liberal plerixafor usage. In addition some patients are hospitalized due to neutropenic sepsis with this regimen. Our data shows anti-myeloma effects of cyclophosphamide +G-CSF is not demonstrated. There are ongoing studies from the Finland group which show no difference in the number of CD34+ cells collected after initial therapy with lenalidomide. The only difference is the number of days required for apheresis. In addition to above our single center experience shows both PFS and OS benefit for G-CSF only PBSC mobilization. . This may partially be explained by the slight difference in ISS risk stages in our patients but on censoring for ISS stage 3 these results were more pronounced. This is the first time we have seen any report point out towards a PFS and OS difference between two widely used mobilization regimens. This needs testing in a large randomized multi-center study to see if there is a difference and if so is this due to a change in milieu of lymphocytes. We have previously reported that absolute lymphocyte count on day 15 post autograft was reflective of a higher lymphocyte count in the apheresis bag in case of G-CSF only mobilizations as compared to cyclophosphamide +G-CSF. The absolute lymphocyte count on day 30 was a predictor for better OS. Figure 1. Progression free Survival Figure 1. Progression free Survival Figure 2. Overall survival Figure 2. Overall survival Figure 3. progression free survival for ISS score 3 Figure 3. progression free survival for ISS score 3 Disclosures Sutton: bayer: Honoraria. Paneesha:Janssen: Consultancy. Nikolousis:Alexion: Honoraria. Kishore:Jazz pharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Stem Cell Transplant in Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Response Failure in the Era of Novel Therapies.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1878-1878
Author(s):  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
David Dingli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Novel Agent

Abstract Abstract 1878 Poster Board I-900 Autologous stem cell transplant as a platform for multiple myeloma treatment is the standard of care for patients who can safely withstand the procedure. Before novel agents were introduced, one-third to one-half of patients did not achieve partial response at transplant. Previously published medical literature has showed that in this past era, absence of initial response to induction therapy had no impact on progression-free survival and overall survival after high-dose therapy. Lack of response to initial induction did not preclude a good response after stem cell transplant. With the introduction of novel agents—immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors—response rates with initial therapy are now between 70% and 100%. This retrospective study analyzes progression-free survival and overall survival in patients who do not have a partial response after induction therapy with a regimen that contains a novel agent. Unlike patients in reports published previously—before novel agents—patients who do not achieve partial remission have a significantly shorter overall survival from transplant (74.0 vs 43.5 months) and a shorter progression-free survival (22.6 vs 13.1 months; P<.001). Absence of a response to induction therapy with a novel agent predicts a poorer outcome after high-dose therapy.{abstabft}.b CR+VGPR for plateau, P<.001 compared with other 3 categories. Failure to respond to novel-agent induction leads to shorter posttransplant progression-free survival (PFS). Failure to respond to novel-agent induction leads to shorter posttransplant overall survivalDisclosures: Gertz: celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar: celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lacy: celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria.TableMultivariable Analysis of Posttransplant Progression-Free SurvivalVariableP ValuePlateau vs relapsed-refractory.003Albumin.86Sex.94b2-Microglobulin.89Bone marrow plasma cells.18Age.75Abnormal cytogenetics.002CTX mobilization.51Labeling index.002

Short Progression Free Survival Post Non-Myeloablative Sibling Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantion for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4323-4323
Author(s):  
Kevin Song ◽  
Heather J. Sutherland ◽  
John D. Shepherd ◽  
Yasser Abou Mourad ◽  
Michael J Barnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Graft Versus Host

Abstract 4323 Introduction Allogeneic stem cell transplant has been considered the only potentially curative treatment for patients with myeloma. Due to the high treatment related mortality associated with myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation, non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantion is being investigated. Methods Between May 2003 and June 2008, 23 patients received a non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant (NMT) using a fully matched sibling as the donor. All had received a previous autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). 17 received the NMT as a part of a planned tandem transplant post ASCT. Six received the NMT after relapse post ASCT. Conditioning chemotherapy was a combination of cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m2 daily x 2 days and Fludarabine 25mg/m2 daily for 5 days. Survival was measured from the date of allogeneic stem cell infusion. Results Median age at NMT was 52 years. Eight were female. Immunoglobulin isotype was 13 IgG; 5 IgA; 1 IgD; 4 light chain. ISS stage was 10 – stage 1; 8 – stage 2; 3- stage 3; 2 – insufficient information. 9/21 had del 13q; 3/9 t (4;14); 1/7 del 17p. Disease status at the time of NMT were 5 CR/nCR, 11 PR, 1 SD, 3 relapse chemo-sensitive, 3 relapse chemo-resistant. Median follow-up is 29 months (7 – 65 months). Median event free survival (EFS) for all patients is 17 months (95 % CI 8-26 months). Median EFS for the 17 patients who received NMT as a part of a planned tandem procedure was 18 months. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients is 29 months (95% CI unable to calculate). At the time of analysis 17 patients remain alive. Five patients are alive in continuous remission at a median of 40.9 months from NMT (13.5-47.6 months). Twelve patients have active disease requiring treatment. Three patients have died of myeloma, one of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and two of other causes. Nineteen patients (83%) developed GVHD at some time post-transplant. Of 14 patients who have relapsed, eleven patients had GVHD at the time of relapse. Of the 6 patient who received the NMT after relapse post ASCT, 5 have relapsed post NMT and one died of GVHD within 9 months. Conclusion Non-myeloablative sibling allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myeloma produces short progression free survival in-spite of the presence of graft-versus-host-disease and only a limited number of patients benefit. Patient who receive this treatment after relapse from prior autologous stem cell transplant do particularly poorly. Improved overall survival is primary due to improvements in post-relapse myeloma therapy.

Monoclonal and Oligoclonal Bands After Single Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Impact On Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 595-595
Author(s):  
Victor Hugo Jimenez-Zepeda ◽  
Norman Franke ◽  
Andrew Winter ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Christine I. Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Oligoclonal Bands ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 595 Multiple myeloma is a malignancy of terminally differentiated plasma cells in which the malignant plasma cell clone usually produces a single abnormal unique monoclonal antibody with a constant isotype and light chain-restricted paraprotein. Recently, the occurrence of oligoclonal and monoclonal bands (OB/MB) not related to the original clone has been reported in patients with multiple myeloma who undergo autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and/or receive treatment with novel agents. Based on this data, the aim of our study was to assess the impact of monoclonal (MB) and oligoclonal bands (OB) occurrence on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for MM patients undergoing single ASCT at Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH). Patient and Methods: All consecutive patients with documented MM undergoing single ASCT at PMH from 01/00 to 12/07 were evaluated. Oligoclonal banding (OB) was defined as the development of two or more concurrent monoclonal-type bands on the serum electrophoretic pattern, with either a different heavy or light chain component from the original M-protein band at day+100 post-ASCT. A new monoclonal band (MB) was defined as a heavy and/or light chain immunoglobulin distinct from the initially diagnosed MM. All cases with OB/MB in our series fulfilled the criteria of secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Multivariate analysis was performed with the Cox proportional hazard model. All analyses were performed using the SPSS 13.0 software. Results: Between January 2000 and December 2007, 788 patients were identified. Clinical and laboratory characteristics are listed in Table 1 Ninety-six patients (12.1%) developed OB/MB at 3 months from ASCT: 32 patients (33.3%) had OB, and 64 patients (66.7%) had a new MB. The median duration of the OB/MB was 12 months (range 4–52 months). OB and MB emerged after ASCT in 14% (60/409) of patients receiving VAD, 7.0% of patients receiving bortezomib (6/86) and 8.6% of patients receiving thalidomide (6/69) containing regimens as induction therapy. Thirty-seven (38%) patients with subsequent development of an OB/MB had achieved ≥VGPR after induction and this rate improved to 79% (76/96) at day +100 post-ASCT. Patients who did not develop OB/MB had a ≥VGPR rate of 28% and 58% after induction and day+100 post-ASCT, representing a lower rate than patients with OB/MB (p=0.07 and 0.002, respectively). At the time of this analysis, 65 (67.7%) of the cohort patients who developed OB/MB are alive and 68 have already progressed (70.8%). Median overall survival for patients who did not develop OB/MB at day+100 post ASCT was 74.5 months compared to 115.5 months for those who developed OB/MB (p=0.0098). Multivariate analysis shows developing of OB/MB as an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS (p=0.006 and 0.021, respectively). (Fig1a-b) The duration of the OB/MB did not affect OS and PFS. In conclusion, OB/MB occurrence is an important prognostic factor in MM patients who undergo ASCT, the biological significance and its impact on clinical outcomes should be prospectively validated. Disclosures: Chen: Roche: Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Tiedemann:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Kukreti:Roche: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5699-5699
Author(s):  
Neelakanta Dadi ◽  
Venkata Vosuri ◽  
Samip R Master ◽  
Richard Preston Mansour
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Background: Salvage autologous stem cell transplant (SAT)is an alternative treatment option for relapsed multiple myeloma patients that offers additional progression-free survival (PFS2) and overall survival (OS2) advantage over salvage chemotherapy. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of salvage transplant in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma after initial transplant. Methods: This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science was conducted up to December 31st, 2018. Two independent reviewers screened the literature and extracted data. All studies including randomized, retrospective or prospective studies in multiple myeloma patients who underwent salvage autologous transplant were included. Abstracts, posters, review articles, case reports and studies with syngeneic and tandem transplant were excluded. Articles were excluded if they did not provide transplant related outcomes data. The search terms included "Salvage autologous stem cell transplantation", "Second autologous stem cell transplantation", "multiple myeloma". 'Meta' and "Metafor' libraries in R software (CRAN Project) were used for the analysis. Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using DerSimonian-Laird (DL) random effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using Q test and sensitivity analysis. Results: The search strategy identified over 3260 articles; 16 studies (n = 1113 patients; 1 randomized trial; 15 retrospective studies) were selected for this meta-analysis. The sample size of the studies varied between 25 and 200 patients. All studies used melphalan conditioning for salvage transplant. A significant number of patients in about 10 studies received maintenance after initial transplant. Only one study included patients who received maintenance therapy after salvage transplant. Pooled rate of patients achieving partial response or more(≥PR) after salvage transplant was 76% (95%CI: 68-83; I2=84%). Pooled rate of transplant related mortality (TRM2) was 5.5% (95%CI: 2.6-9.3; I2=78%). The pooled estimates showed a median progression free survival (PFS2) 13.5 months (95%CI: 11.3 - 15.6; I2=100%), overall survival (OS2) 34.3 months (95%CI: 27.9 - 40.7; I2=100%). The results are shown in figures 1&2. Conclusion: SAT approach had favorable outcomes of achieving durable PFS and OS in relapsed myeloma patients. A Higher TRM was observed with salvage transplant than in upfront transplant. Prospective randomized trials are needed to define benefits of SAT in comparison with "best non-ASCT" therapy in patients with MM who relapse after primary therapy. Figure 1 Disclosures Mansour: Abbvie: Other: Stock; Astra Zeneca: Other: Stock; Bluebird Bio: Other: Stock; CRISPR: Other: Stock; Editas: Other: Stock; Johnson and Johnson: Other: Stock; Novartis: Other: Stock.

p53 Deletion Yields High Response Rates but Rapid Progression and Poor Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 953-953
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
Jodi Goodwin ◽  
Xiaoying Qi ◽  
Wei Xu ◽  
Keith Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Background: The p53 deletion has been documented to confer poor prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with either conventional chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, it is not clear whether primary drug resistance and/or rapid relapse account for these adverse outcomes. Objective: Evaluate the impact of the p53 deletion in patients who have undergone ASCT for MM on baseline features, response to initial therapy, progression free survival and overall survival post ASCT. Method: Retrospective review of all patients undergoing ASCT for MM at our institution from January 2000 to July 2007. Results: 31 patients with the p53 deletion intended for ASCT were identified. Four patients did not undergo transplant: 2 patients had plasma cell leukemia (PCL) and died within 4 months of diagnosis, 1 patient had primary refractory disease to all therapy and died in 1 year, and 1 patient’s stem cells could not be collected. The 28 who underwent transplant had a median age of 52 (range 30–76) and 20 (78%) were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgG in 14 (52%), light chain in 10 (36%), IgA in 1 (4%), IgD in 1 (4%) and non secretory in 1 (4%). 23 pts (85%) had bony disease. ISS stage was as follows: 13 (52%) stage I, 6 (24%) stage II, and 6 (24%) stage III. Seven patients presented with PCL. All patients were treated with dexamethasone based induction chemotherapy (alone or VAD), with 6 patients also receiving thalidomide. Pre-transplant status after induction therapy was 0 CR, 22 PR (92%), 1 MR (4%) and 1 SD (4%). All patients were conditioned with high dose melphalan 140–200mg/m2. There was one patient who died within 100 days of transplant. Overall responses after completion of ASCT, compared with diagnosis, in evaluable pts (n=22) included 1 CR (5%), 19 PR (86%), 2 MR (9%). Median progression free survival (PFS) for this cohort was 16.9 months (95%CI 9.1–22.3) and median overall survival (OS) was 48.2 months (95%CI 11.3–67.2) post transplant. This is considerably shorter when compared to the full cohort of MM pts transplanted at our institution during the same timeframe (n= 706): median PFS 24.4 months and median OS 76.6 months post transplant. Conclusions: Patients with the p53 deletion have a high incidence of plasma cell leukemia (29%), but most respond well to induction therapy and ASCT. However, the duration of response is short (16.9 months), nearly 8 months less than our overall results with ASCT. Furthermore, median overall survival post transplant is only 4 years, over 2 years shorter than the median of 6.4 years observed in all ASCT patients. ASCT is less effective therapy in patients with this poor prognostic marker; development of novel therapeutic regimens, including targeting p53 dysregulation pathway, may be required to improve the clinical outcome in this subset of MM.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document