A Retrospective Single Center Comparison of Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF Versus G-CSF Alone for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Mobilisation Following First Line Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1898-1898
Author(s):  
Richard S Whitmill ◽  
David J Lewis ◽  
David John Sutton ◽  
Jahanzeb Khawaja ◽  
Georgina Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Absolute Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Neutropenic Sepsis ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Abstract Introduction Autologous transplantation is considered standard therapy for young and fit myeloma patients after initial therapy. Cyclophosphamide+ G-CSF is considered standard therapy for collection even though there is evidence for minimal anti-myeloma effect of cyclophosphamide, some increased short term toxicity and potential concerns regarding long term toxicity. There have been a few retrospective comparisons and one randomized study comparing cyclophosphamide based and G-CSF alone based PBSC collection. To our best knowledge they have not reported any impact in progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). We have compared here our myeloma patient cohort to explore these important endpoints. Patients and methods 89 patients (55 male and 34 female) who underwent first autologous transplant for myeloma between 2003 and 2010 were analysed in our study. Mobilization was with G-CSF alone in 45 patients (median age 58 yrs, range 38-70 yrs.) and cyclophosphamide and G-CSF in 44 (median age 58 yrs, range 41-74 yrs.). Cyclophosphamide was used at 3g/m2 and in both cases G-CSF used was lenogastrim at 10mcg/kg. There were 7 patients with ISS stage 3 in the G-CSF only group as compared to 10 in the Cyclophosphamide group. Prior chemotherapy was cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone in majority of cases (n=55) with no difference across both groups. Data regarding high risk genetics and pre-transplant response was unavailable. We collected data progression free survival, overall survival, harvest dose and engraftment kinetics. Data was analyzed using SPSS and log rank test. Results The median dose of stem cells collected with G-CSF alone was 3.59×106 CD34 cells/kg (range 1.84-8.09) where as with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF it was 3.8×106 CD34 cells/kg (range 1.6-13). There was no difference in engraftment between the two groups with median neutrophil engraftment (Absolute neutrophil count>0.20×109/L) at day 14 and platelet engraftment (>50×109/L) at day 15 and 16 respectively. Progression free survival was significantly better in G-CSF alone cohort (46 months vs. 38 months, P=0.016) (fig. a) Overall survival was better in the GCSF only group as well (113 months vs. 75 months, P=0.029) (fig b). In the 17 high risk patients PFS was much better in the G-CSF group (60months vs. 22 months, P=0.02) (Fig c). There were 4 (9%) admissions in the cyclophosphamide group due to neutropenic sepsis as compared to none in the G-CSF group. Discussion Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF may be associated with slightly higher stem cell yields but this margin is becoming smaller and not significant in the era of liberal plerixafor usage. In addition some patients are hospitalized due to neutropenic sepsis with this regimen. Our data shows anti-myeloma effects of cyclophosphamide +G-CSF is not demonstrated. There are ongoing studies from the Finland group which show no difference in the number of CD34+ cells collected after initial therapy with lenalidomide. The only difference is the number of days required for apheresis. In addition to above our single center experience shows both PFS and OS benefit for G-CSF only PBSC mobilization. . This may partially be explained by the slight difference in ISS risk stages in our patients but on censoring for ISS stage 3 these results were more pronounced. This is the first time we have seen any report point out towards a PFS and OS difference between two widely used mobilization regimens. This needs testing in a large randomized multi-center study to see if there is a difference and if so is this due to a change in milieu of lymphocytes. We have previously reported that absolute lymphocyte count on day 15 post autograft was reflective of a higher lymphocyte count in the apheresis bag in case of G-CSF only mobilizations as compared to cyclophosphamide +G-CSF. The absolute lymphocyte count on day 30 was a predictor for better OS. Figure 1. Progression free Survival Figure 1. Progression free Survival Figure 2. Overall survival Figure 2. Overall survival Figure 3. progression free survival for ISS score 3 Figure 3. progression free survival for ISS score 3 Disclosures Sutton: bayer: Honoraria. Paneesha:Janssen: Consultancy. Nikolousis:Alexion: Honoraria. Kishore:Jazz pharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Analysis of Outcome after Autologous Stem Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myeloma: Comparison of Different Induction Regimens.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3079-3079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) improves survival in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). We have previously demonstrated that the degree of response at transplant does not impact on the outcome of transplant. However, newer induction regimens such as thalidomide and dexamethasone (Thal-Dex) result in higher response rates compared to previously used regimens such as single agent dexamethasone or vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD). We examined the outcome of SCT following three different induction therapies for newly diagnosed MM, namely VAD, single agent Dex, and Thal-Dex. Patients and Methods: 340 patients with MM who received their SCT within 12 mos of diagnosis (median 5.8, range 3–12) were studied. Patients receiving more than one induction therapy as well as those in whom thalidomide was added to dexamethasone for lack of response were excluded from the analysis. There were 105 pts in the VAD group, 140 in the Dex group and 95 in the Thal-Dex group. Responses were defined using standard criteria. Results: The study cohort consisted of 209 males (59%), with a median age of 57 years (range 30–76) at transplant. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 3 groups, except for lower age in the VAD group (median 55.8) compared to Dex (59.6) and Thal Dex (57.4) and shorter time to transplant in the Dex group (5.4 m) compared to VAD (6.4) and Thal Dex (5.9). Markers of disease activity pre-transplant, including B2M and marrow plasma cell percentage were higher in the Dex group compared to either VAD or Thal Dex. The proportion of patients with any response to induction therapy was lower in the Dex group compared to the other two. All pts in the Dex and the Thal-Dex groups received melphalan only conditioning compared to 70% in the VAD group, the rest receiving Melphalan/TBI. An objective response was achieved after SCT in 96%, 97%, and 98% of pts in the VAD, Dex and Thal-Dex groups respectively (P=0.8). A complete response to SCT was seen in 49% of patients in VAD group, 45% among those in the Dex group and 38% among those in the Thal Dex group (P=0.38). There was no difference in the median progression free survival after transplant (P=0.21) or overall survival from diagnosis (P=.34) between the three groups. The proportion free from progression at 2 years post transplant was 54%, 55% and 46% for Dex, VAD and Thal-Dex respectively. The proportion surviving at 4 years from diagnosis was 64%, 65.4% and 72% respectively for the three groups. Conclusion: We did not observe any difference in the response rates including complete responses to SCT in the three groups with nearly all pts in each group achieving a response. The progression free survival and overall survival appear to be comparable between the three groups. The results from initial therapy cannot be compared between the three regimens since the study population is restricted to patients reaching stem cell transplant. Within the limits of the study, there does not appear to be any long term impact of the initial therapy for the patients going onto an early stem cell transplant. Figure Figure

Increasing the Number of Apheresis Collections Increases Lymphocyte Collection and Affects Survival after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 892-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis F. Porrata ◽  
Dennis A. Gastineau ◽  
Alvaro Pineda ◽  
Jeffrey L. Winters ◽  
S. Breanndan Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Absolute Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma

Abstract Peripheral blood infused total autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) correlates with day 15 absolute lymphocyte count and is an independent prognostic factor for survival after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Factors to enhance A-ALC collections are not well defined. We hypothesize that the number of peripheral blood apheresis collections (PBAC) directly correlates with A-ALC. 190 consecutive NHL patients who underwent ASCT at the Mayo Clinic between 1993 and 2001 were analyzed. The primary end point of the study was to assess the correlation between the number of PBAC and A-ALC. The secondary end point was to determine if the number of PBAC affected survival post-ASCT. Of the 190 patients, 18 patients underwent 1 PBAC, 23 patients 2 PBAC, 50 patients 3 PBAC, 37 patients 4 PBAC, 50 patients 5 PBAC, and 12 patients had ≥ 6 PBAC. There was no association between the number of PBAC and the number of CD34+ stem cells collected (p= 0.25). A strong association between number of PBAC and A-ALC (Kruskall Wallis test, p <0.0001)(Figure 1) was identified. Using a cut-off of 4 PBAC, superior overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were observed for patients that underwent 4 PBAC or more compared to patients that underwent less than 4 PBAC (86 months vs 18 months, p <0.0001; 76 months vs 10 months, p <0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated PBAC ≥ 4 is an independent prognostic factor for OS (RR = 0.654, 95%CI: 0.529–0.804, p< 0.0001) and for PFS (RR = 0.682, 95%CI: 0.561–0.826, p< 0.0001) when compared with other significant factors including performance status, lactate dehydrogenase and extra nodal disease. These data suggest that increasing the number of PBAC beyond the minimum number required to meet CD34+ collection targets may result in improved overall and progression-free survival mediated by an increase in autograft absolute lymphocyte count.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Provides Additional Cytoreduction Following Induction Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3099-3099
Author(s):  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Martha Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Suzanne Hayman ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Clinical Records

Abstract Background: High dose therapy (HDT) and stem cell transplant has been shown to improve survival in patients with myeloma and remains the standard of care. However, the reported results of initial HDT in these patients reflect the combined effect of the initial therapy and the HDT. The contribution of HDT on its own is often difficult to analyze in this group of patients with varying degree of response to initial therapy. In this single institution retrospective study, we have analyzed the results of HDT in a group of patients with measurable disease at the time of HDT. Methods: We identified patients from our transplant database, who had measurable disease at the time of initiation of transplant as defined by a serum M protein of ≥ 1.0 g/dL, 24 hour urine M-protein ≥ 200 mg or a bone marrow plasma cell % of ≥ 30. Details regarding the clinical outcome were obtained from the database and from patient clinical records. Chi square test was used for comparison of nominal variables and t-test for continuous variables. Kaplan Meier analysis was used for comparing survival and Cox proportional hazards was employed to identify predictors of progression free and overall survival. Responses were defined by the EBMTR criteria, using the measurements at the time HDT and the lowest measurement obtained. VGPR required a 90% reduction in the serum M component with urine protein &lt; 100 mg/24 hours. Results: A total of 440 patients were studied; 271 (61.5%) of whom had a transplant within one year of their diagnosis. Among the 271 patients, 140 (52%) were in the initial plateau, 99 (36%) failed to achieve a PR to initial therapy and 32 (12%) were in their first relapse. Given the known differences in the outcome between these groups of patients, those receiving an early transplant were analyzed separately. The response rates included CR (24%), VGPR (7%), PR (52%), MR or less (17%) and among the late transplants CR (23%), VGPR (8%), PR (61%) and MR or less (8%). The median progression free survival was 23.6 mos and the overall survival from HDT was 62 mos. In a multivariate analysis, presence of cytogenetic abnormalities (RR: 2.5) and high plasma cell labeling index (≥ 1%) (RR: 2.4) at HDT and failure to achieve a CR or VGPR (RR: 1.7) were prognostic for decreased progression free survival post HDT. In a similar model, only high PCLI (RR: 2.8) and abnormal cytogenetics (RR: 2.5) at HDT predicted for poor overall survival after transplant. Conclusion: This study provides a sense of the contribution of HDT, independent of the initial therapy, by determining responses based on the immediate pre-transplant disease measurements and the best values observed post transplant. In this group of patients with residual measurable disease after the initial therapy, HDT therapy leads to complete responses in nearly a quarter of the patients and a VGPR in another 7%, an outcome associated with better progressin free survival. While measurements at transplant do not correlate strictly with response to initial therapy, the aim of this study was to understand the individual contribution of HDT in these patients. Thus some of the patients who would have been classified as having a partial response to induction and HDT may be classified as non-responders in this analysis. These numbers will provide a historical comparison for trials evaluating novel consolidation therapies for myeloma.

Plasmablastic Morphology Is an Independent Predictor of Poor Survival After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1551-1551 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
Terry M. Therneau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Survival ◽  
Free Survival

PURPOSE: To study the prognostic value of plasmablastic morphology after autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients were studied. Investigators blinded to the clinical details of the individual cases reviewed bone marrow aspirate slides to determine plasmablastic classification. Plasmablasts were defined using strict, well-described criteria. Plasmablastic morphology was considered to be present (plasmablastic myeloma) when 2% or more plasmablasts were present in the plasma-cell population. RESULTS: Patients underwent transplantation 5 to 88 months (median, 20 months) after the initial diagnosis of myeloma. Twenty-eight percent of patients had plasmablastic morphology. A significantly greater proportion of patients with plasmablastic morphology had abnormal cytogenetics compared with those with nonplasmablastic classification (73% v 31%, respectively; P = .003). The overall survival rate measured from the time of transplantation was significantly worse in patients with plasmablastic morphology compared with those without (median survival time, 5 months v 24 months, respectively; P < .001). Progression-free survival time was shortened also, with a median time of 4 months compared with 12 months, respectively (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis, plasmablastic classification was the most powerful prognostic factor after transplantation for both overall (P = .001) and progression-free survival rates (P < .001). We also identified three risk groups based on plasmablastic morphology: plasma-cell labeling index, lactate dehydrogenase, and cytogenetics. The median overall survival time was 38 months when none of these factors was abnormal, 17 months with one abnormal factor, and 8 months with two or more abnormal factors (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Plasmablastic morphology is a powerful independent predictor of poor survival rate after autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory myeloma.

Similar Outcome of Non-Myeloablative and Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Patients Greater Than Fifty Years of Age.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 300-300
Author(s):  
Edwin P. Alyea ◽  
Haesook Kim ◽  
Corey Cutler ◽  
Vincent T. Ho ◽  
John Gribben ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Advanced age is a relative contraindication to myeloablative allogeneic transplantation due to the increased incidence of treatment related complications seen in older patients. Therefore, non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation (NST) is increasingly utilized in this population. The impact of the shift from myeloablative to NST upon relapse, transplant complications, and outcome has yet to be examined. We performed a retrospective analysis of 152 patients older than age 50 receiving either NST or myeloablative transplantation over a 5 years period. The decision to pursue non-myeloablative as opposed to myeloablative conditioning during this period was based on patient and physician preference. Seventy-one patients received non-myeloablative conditioning, fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day x 4) and intravenous busulfan (0.8 mg/kg/d x 4). Eighty-one patients received myeloablative conditioning, primarily cyclophosphamide and TBI. All patients received pharmacologic prophylaxis to prevent GVHD with the majority of patients receiving FK 506 and methotrexate in both groups (78% NST, 96% myeloablative) with the remainder receiving cyclosporine and prednisone. 93% of NST patients received mobilized PBSC, the median CD34+ cell count infused was 6.4 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.0 to 31.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg). 80% of myeloablative patients received marrow. The median age was 58 (range 51–70) years for patients receiving NST and 54 (range 51–66) years for patients receiving myeloablative transplantation. Major disease groups included acute leukemia and MDS (51% NST, 41% myeloblative). Ten percent of non-myeloablative transplant patients were in CR1 or had early stage disease at transplantation compared with 40% of myeloablative transplant patients. Primary indications for NST were advanced age (56%) and prior myeloablative transplant (24%). The median follow-up is 18 months (range 6 to 34 months) for patients receiving non-myeloablative transplantation and 46 months (range 3 to 73 months) for patients receiving myeloablative transplantation. NST patients were more likely to have unrelated donors (58% vs. 36%, p=0.009), prior transplant (25% vs. 4%, p=&lt;0.0001), and active disease at transplantation (85% vs. 59%, p=&lt;0.001). Despite the adverse characteristics, overall survival was improved in the NST group at 1 (51% vs. 39%) and 2 (39% vs. 29%) years (p = 0.056). There was no difference in progression free survival (2 year, 27% vs. 25%, p =0.24). Incidence of 2–4 GVHD was similar, (28% vs. 27%). Non-relapse mortality was lower for NST patients (32% vs. 50%, p=0.01), but relapse was higher (46% vs. 30%, p=0.052). A subset analysis was performed assessing overall and progression free survival in patients with advanced leukemia (beyond CR1) and advanced MDS. This demonstrated marginally improved overall survival and progression free survival for patients receiving NST. Our experience suggests that, in patients over age 50, NST with fludarabine and low dose busulfan leads to an overall outcome at least as good as myeloablative therapy.

Total Body Irradiation, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Followed by Randomization to Therapy with Interleukin-2 Versus Observation for Patients with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Results of a Phase III Randomized Trial by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 9438).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 326-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Thompson ◽  
Richard I. Fisher ◽  
Michael L. LeBlanc ◽  
Joseph M. Unger ◽  
Stephen J. Forman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Survival Estimate ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Purpose: To determine the effect of post-transplant immunotherapy with Interleukin-2 (IL-2) on the progression-free and overall survival of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) after autologous stem cell transplantation and to assess the toxicity of post-transplant IL-2 therapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with previously treated low, intermediate, or high grade NHL (except Working Formulation Groups A and I) were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and total body irradiation (TBI) and an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). Twenty-eight to 80 days after PBSCT, patients were randomized to treatment with IL-2 versus observation. Results: Between January 1995 and July 2004, three hundred ninety-four patients with low-grade (n=61) or intermediate-high grade NHL (n=315) were registered at one of 39 SWOG transplant centers. One hundred ninety patients did not proceed to randomization, because of patient refusal (44), grade V toxicity (30), disease progression (28), toxicity (28), or other reasons. Two hundred four patients were randomized to treatment with continuous infusion intravenous IL-2 (9 ×106 units/m2/day for four days followed five days later by 1.6 ×106 units/m2/day for 10 days) versus observation. The 4-year progression-free survival estimate for all eligible patients is 34%, and the 4-year overall survival estimate is 52%. There was no difference in progression-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) of IL-2 to observation = 0.90; p = 0.56) nor in overall survival (HR of IL-2 to observation = 0.88; p = 0.55). There were no deaths related to IL-2 treatment. Grade IV IL-2-related toxicities included hematologic (n=10), cardiovascular (4), renal/bladder (2), flu-like symptoms (1), lung (1), metabolic (1), and neurologic (1) and were reversible in all cases. Conclusions: These results confirm earlier SWOG findings that a regimen of cylophosphamide, etoposide and TBI followed by PBSCT can be administered to patients with relapsed or refractory NHL with acceptable toxicity and with encouraging progression-free and overall survival. Post-transplant therapy with IL-2 given at this dose and schedule of administration had no significant effect on post-transplant relapse, progression-free survival or overall survival.

Lack of HLA Class I Ligands for Autologous Inhibitory KIR Is Associated with Improved Survival Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Children with Neuroblastoma.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3322-3322
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M Venstrom ◽  
Junting Zheng ◽  
Reenat S Hasan ◽  
Karen E Danis ◽  
Irene Y Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hla Class I ◽  
Class I ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hla Ligand ◽  
Myeloablative Chemotherapy

Abstract Background: In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematologic malignancies, natural killer (NK) cells contribute to tumor eradication such that leukemia patients lacking the HLA class I ligand for the donor NK inhibitory killer Ig-like receptors (KIR) have lower relapse rates and longer survival. Since myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous HSCT (ASCT) improves survival for children with high risk neuroblastoma (a tumor sensitive to NK killing) we hypothesize that NK cells may be active in this setting and that KIR-HLA combinations where the patient lacks HLA class I ligands for autologous KIR may be associated with improved clinical outcomes. Methods: 155 children with high risk neuroblastoma received myeloablative chemotherapy followed by ASCT between 1992 and 2004. Most patients received anti-GD2 antibody 3F8 and 13-cis-retinoic acid following ASCT. HLA and KIR genotyping was performed. Patients were segregated according to those with or without HLA class I ligand for autologous inhibitory KIR. We examined the 3 inhibitory KIR groups with identified class I ligands: KIR2DL2/2DL3, which recognize HLA-CAsn80(HLA-C1 group), KIR2DL1 recognizing HLA-C Lys80(HLA-C2 group), and KIR3DL1 recognizing HLA-Bw4; as well as 6 activating KIR and 2 KIR haplotype groups. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and hazard ratios by Cox regression. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Comparisons of each end point were based on the log-rank statistics. Results: 66% of the 155 children lacked at least 1 HLA ligand for his/ her inhibitory KIR. With median followup of 66.8 months, patients lacking a KIR ligand (n=103) had a 45% lower risk of death compared with patients with all HLA ligands present (n=52) (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.33–0.90; P=0.015). Similarly, for progression-free survival, the risk of relapse or death was 39% lower for patients lacking an HLA ligand for inhibitory KIR (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39–0.97; P=0.035). In particular, patients lacking the HLA-C1 ligand for KIR2DL2/2DL3 experienced an overall survival benefit (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.11–1.09; P=0.060). Activating KIR and KIR haplotypes were not associated with survival. Conclusion: Among children with high risk neuroblastoma undergoing ASCT, improved overall and progression-free survival is associated with the absence of one or more HLA class I ligands for the patient’s NK cell inhibitory KIR receptor. KIRHLA immunogenetics may therefore be a novel genetic indicator of prognosis for patients undergoing ASCT. Mechanistically, these findings imply that NK tolerance is modified after ASCT, and that KIR-HLA genotypes may also play a role in antibodybased immunotherapy, since most of these patients received 3F8 antibody. These findings require confirmation in a larger prospective study. Figure Figure

Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Chemorefractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4554-4554
Author(s):  
Catherine Garnett ◽  
Chrissy Giles ◽  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Maialen Lasa ◽  
Holger W. Auner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4554 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma, resulting in improved survival and response rate compared to conventional chemotherapy. Disease relapse, however, remains almost inevitable and thus the role of two successive (tandem) autologous stem cell transplants has been evaluated in chemorefractory patients as a means of prolonging duration of disease response. We retrospectively analysed the results of nine patients with chemorefractory disease treated at a single UK institution who received tandem ASCT between January 1998 and February 2009. There were six men and three women. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 42–65 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgG in eight patients and IgA in one patient. Median serum paraprotein level was 41g/L (range 12–73g/L) at presentation. At time of 1st transplant six patients were in stable disease (SD) and three had evidence of progressive disease. Conditioning melphalan dose was 140mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 110mg/m2 and 200mg/m2. Median time between transplants was 3.7 months (range 2.3–6.4 months) with PR and SD being observed in 2/9 and 7/9 patients at time of 2nd transplant. None of the patients reached complete response (CR). One patient received melphalan 140mg/m2 prior to 2nd transplant. The remaining patients received melphalan 200mg/m2. Median follow up after tandem transplant was 54.3 months (range 15.6 –143.6 months). No treatment related mortality was reported. At the time of analysis, six patients were still alive and under follow up with an overall survival (OS) figure for the group of 52% at 10 years from diagnosis (Figure 1). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 20 months from 2nd transplant (range 6.7–62.6 months) (Figure 2). Tandem autologous stem cell transplant in chemorefractory patients has resulted in overall survival similar to autologous stem cell transplant in chemosensitive patients and should be considered in patients with chemorefractory disease. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis in patients receiving tandem autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Figure 2: Progression free survival following tandem transplant Figure 2:. Progression free survival following tandem transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document