Limited Phase I Trial of Sequential High Dose Cytarabine and Clofarabine (HiDAC→CLOF) in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4565-4565
Author(s):  
Bayard L. Powell ◽  
James Lovato ◽  
Claire Kimbrough ◽  
Susan Lyerly ◽  
Sonya Galloway-Daniels ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract High dose cytarabine (HiDAC) is the most effective single agent for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML); clofarabine (CLOF) is also an active agent in AML. Preclinical data suggest synergy between cytarabine and clofarabine. We conducted a two step limited phase I trial of sequential HiDAC (2g/m2 over 3 hours) followed by CLOF (30 or 40 mg/m2 infused over 2 hours), each given daily for 5 days, in adults with AML in first or second relapse or refractory to initial induction chemotherapy. Patients with persistent leukemia on day 12–14 received a second course of HiDAC→CLOF; phase I toxicity evaluation was based on cycle 1 data only. Nine patients (6 men and 3 women) were treated. The median age was 55.5 years (range 29.2 – 68.1). All had relapsed AML; two had prior autologous stem cell transplant. The initial cohort of 3 patients received clofarabine 30 mg/m2 with one dose limiting toxicity (DLT); an additional 3 patients were treated in cohort 1. The second cohort was treated with CLOF 40 mg/m2, the target dose for a planned phase II trial of HiDAC→CLOF. Hematologic toxicities and infections were not considered DLT. In the first cohort (30 mg/m2; n = 6) there was 1 DLT - grade 4 skin rash in a patient who subsequently died on day 17 with sepsis-related multi-organ failure; 3 patients had reversible grade 3 elevations in AST/ALT, 1 had grade 3 skin toxicity. In cohort 2 (40 mg/m2 ; n = 3) there was no DLT; 1 patient had grade 3 AST/ALT; 2 had grade 3 skin. Three of nine patients received a second course of induction HiDACCLOF. Two of six patients in cohort 1 achieved complete remission (CR), 1/3 patients in cohort 2 achieved CRi(CRp). Two of three CR/CRi patients received one course and one received two courses of HiDAC→CLOF induction. Conclusion: HiDAC→CLOF was associated with transient elevation in AST/ALT (4/9) and skin rash (3/9; primarily extensive palmar/plantar); skin toxicity appeared especially prominent in patients with palmar/plantar toxicity during prior therapy with HiDAC. Toxicities (other than skin) were comparable to other salvage regimens for relapsed and refractory AML. This combination is active in relapsed AML with 3/9 CR/CRp. A phase II trial of HiDAC→CLOF is underway; prophylactic intravenous hydrocortisone has been incorporated in an attempt to decrease skin toxicity.

Phase 2 Trial of G-CSF Priming, Clofarabine, and High Dose Cytarabine (GCLAC) for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Advanced Myeloproliferative Neoplasm,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3617-3617
Author(s):  
Pamela S Becker ◽  
Bruno C. Medeiros ◽  
Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽  
Bart Lee Scott ◽  
Paul C. Hendrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Pulmonary Toxicity ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 3617 Clofarabine and cytarabine combinations have been effective in the treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in both the relapsed/refractory and upfront settings. Based on our results with GCLAC (G-CSF priming, clofarabine, and high dose cytarabine) in a trial for relapsed/refractory AML (Becker et al. Br J Haematol in press), we are currently testing this regimen in newly diagnosed patients age < 65. The G-CSF dose is 5 mcg/kg/day by subcutaneous injection beginning the day prior to chemotherapy, clofarabine 30 mg/m2/day × 5 and cytarabine 2 gm/m2/day × 5. Second induction with the same regimen was permissible if marrow blasts over 5% persisted on day 21 or thereafter. Consolidation courses were administered for up to 3 cycles, with clofarabine at a dose of 25 mg/m2/day × 4 days and cytarabine 2 gm/m2/day × 4 days. The primary objectives of this trial are to estimate rates of CR (complete remission) and EFS (event free survival). A stopping rule would be imposed if there was reasonable evidence that the CR rate was inferior to that obtained with standard induction 7+3, 70% (Fernandez et al. NEJM 2009; 361:1249–59). Absent early stopping, 50 patients will be treated. Twenty-five patients with non-APL AML, RAEB2, CMML2, or myelofibrosis with >10% blasts have been treated thus far; their median age is 52, range 22–63. Eleven patients had antecedent hematologic disorders(AHD). Four patients had poor risk cytogenetics, four patients had normal cytogenetics with Flt3+, and 5 patients had good risk cytogenetics. The most significant grade 3/4 toxicity occurring in 2 patients, was a constellation of pulmonary infiltrates, hypoxia, and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage that responded to steroids. This incidence is not dissimilar to the pulmonary toxicity described with single-agent high-dose cytarabine (Andersson et al. Cancer 1990; 65:1079–84). Pulmonary toxicity has not occurred in 8 subsequent patients given steroid premedication. The other grade 3 adverse events (AEs) included pneumonia (8), viral respiratory infection (6), abscess (4), bacteremia (13), and one additional grade 4 AE was septic shock. There has been no treatment related mortality. Fifteen of 17 currently evaluable patients have achieved CR, all but one with a single course, and 1 additional patient attained CRp (complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery). Using a model that accounts for cytogenetics, age, AHD, and organ function, the observed CR rate of 88% (95% CI 64%to 95%) exceeds the expected rate of 61% had the same patients received other high-dose cytarabine containing regimens but without clofarabine. Given the recent shortage of daunorubicin and the lack of assurance that an idarubicin dose (18mg/m2) that would be the nominal equivalent of 90mg/m2 daunorubicin is safe (Garcia-Manero et al. Haematologica 2002; 87:804–7), GCLAC may be a suitable alternative induction regimen for newly diagnosed AML and advanced myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasm. Disclosures: Becker: Sanofi-Oncology: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Clofarabine is FDA approved for treatment of relapsed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Safety and activity of venetoclax in combination with high-dose cytarabine in children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10004-10004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth E Karol ◽  
Thomas Alexander ◽  
Soumyasri Das Gupta ◽  
Stanley B. Pounds ◽  
Kristin Canavera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

10004 Background: Venetoclax is an orally available BCL-2 antagonist with demonstrated activity in adults with newly diagnosed or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we describe the first use of venetoclax 1) in combination with high-dose cytarabine and idarubicin 2) in patients 2-22 years old with relapsed AML. Methods: Patients with relapsed AML or AML refractory to at least two courses of induction therapy were enrolled in this Phase 1 study with a rolling-six design. All patients received venetoclax (240 or 360 mg/m2) on days 1-28 and low-dose (LD: 100 mg/m2 every 12 hours x 20 doses) or high-dose (HD: 1000 mg/m2 every 12 hours x 8 doses) cytarabine beginning on day 8 (Table). Patients who had previously received < 270 mg/m2 of doxorubicin equivalents also received idarubicin 12 mg/m2 on day 8 in dose level 4; other patients were enrolled on the expansion cohort at dose level 3. Non-hematologic CTCAE grade 3 or higher toxicities were intensity limiting (ILT), excluding those anticipated with HD cytarabine. Results: Among 18 evaluable patients, a single ILT (prolonged hematological suppression beyond day 50) was observed (Table). Toxicities were consistent with the underlying cytotoxic chemotherapy, with 14 patients experiencing a total of 40 grade 3 toxicities including 6 documented infections and 23 episodes of febrile neutropenia. There was 1 grade 4 fungal sepsis. The recommended phase 2 dose of venetoclax was 360 mg/m2 (max 600 mg) when combined with HD cytarabine or HD cytarabine/idarubicin. Of the 12 patients with > 50% reduction in blasts following the 7-day venetoclax window therapy, end-of-cycle marrow responses included 7 CR/CRi and 3 PR. Minimal residual disease negative remissions occurred in 4 patients. BH3 profiling of samples and a phase 2 expansion of both dose levels 3 and 4 to further characterize the promising activity of these combinations are underway. Conclusions: Venetoclax combined with cytarabine or cytarabine/idarubicin is active and well tolerated in pediatric patients with relapsed/ refractory AML. Clinical trial information: NCT03194932. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A Phase I Study of CPI-613 in Combination with High-Dose Cytarabine and Mitoxantrone for Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 2060-2073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy S. Pardee ◽  
Rebecca G. Anderson ◽  
Kristin M. Pladna ◽  
Scott Isom ◽  
Lais P. Ghiraldeli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals A Phase I Dose Finding Trial of Eltrombopag during Consolidation Therapy in Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Employing a Unique Dosing Design: PrE0901, a Precog Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4053-4053
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Strickland ◽  
Hillard M. Lazarus ◽  
Xin Victoria Wang ◽  
Jan Cerny ◽  
Witold B. Rybka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: High-dose cytarabine consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) induces profound transient myelosuppression. Thrombocytopenia is a limiting factor in chemotherapy administration for maintaining dose intensity and schedule as thrombocytopenic-related hemorrhage may contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. Therapeutic and prophylactic platelet (plt) transfusions remain the treatment of choice but the benefits typically last only 3-7 days, are expensive, time consuming, and may induce alloimmunization and transmit infection. PrE0901 was a phase I multi-center study to evaluate the safety and toxicity of eltrombopag, an orally bioavailable thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist, for plt recovery in AML patients (pts) receiving consolidation therapy. Methods: The primary objectives were to determine the safety, tolerability, and optimal dosing of eltrombopag while describing the kinetics of plt recovery in AML pts receiving intensive consolidation. Plt recovery was defined as a sustained plt count of ≥ 20 x 109/L following the nadir with no plt transfusions in prior 7 days or a continued upward trend in plt count for at least 2 successive measurements despite no plt transfusions in 48 hours. We used a standard 3+3 design utilizing a novel dose escalation/de-escalation strategy for pts in either first or second complete remission, ≥18 and ≤70 years of age, who had an ECOG performance status of 0-2. Cytarabine was administered at 3 g/m2 (1.5 g/m2 for pts >60 years) IV over 3 hours twice daily on days 1,3,5. Eltrombopag at assigned dose was administered with a first cycle of cytarabine only. Planned eltrombopag dose levels -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 50, 100, 150, 150, 150, 200, and 300 mg, respectively (Table 1). Eltrombopag was to start on days X, X, 3, -1, -5, -5, and -5 relative to day of cytarabine start and levels -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively, with day X being variable depending on timing of observed dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). The eltrombopag was continued until plt recovery or for up to 35 consecutive days, whichever occurred first. An exploratory objective was to determine if eltrombopag had an effect on TPO and EPO blood concentrations in this setting. Results: Accrual began on July 31, 2012 and the trial closed on January 8, 2016 upon recommendation after an independent Data and Monitoring Committee reviewed a separate trial of eltrombopag therapy in MDS which demonstrated futility. 104 pts were screened. 54 declined participation and 35 were deemed medically ineligible. A total of 15 eligible pts were enrolled; 14 were treated on study with one pt being withdrawn prior to starting treatment due to infection. Three pts were treated at each of dose levels 1-4 and two were treated on dose level 5. No DLTs were observed. Median time to plt recovery of all pts treated on study was 22.5 (range 16-43) days. Pts in cohort 1 dosed with eltrombopag 150 mg daily starting on day 3 of consolidation demonstrated the fastest plt recovery (median =19 days; range 19, 19, 19) compared to cohort 2 who received 150 mg daily starting on day -1 of consolidation and recovered the slowest (median 23 days; range 16, 23, 43). Dose escalation in terms of starting eltrombopag further in advance of chemotherapy exposure as within cohort 3 (150 mg starting day -5) was associated with a median plt recovery of 27 (range 22, 27, 27) days. Eltrombopag dose intensification with cohort 4 at 200 mg daily and cohort 5 at 300 mg daily was associated with median plt recoveries of 24 (range 18, 24, 26) and 23 (range 19, 27) days, respectively. Kinetics of plt recovery for all cohorts are represented in Figure 1 and duration of eltrombopag exposure for each individual patient is represented in Table 2. Conclusions: Endogenous cytokine (TPO and EPO) levels varied inversely with plt and hematocrit values and did not appear to be affected by eltrombopag dose / schedule (details to be provided at ASH Annual Mtg). Unusually high screen fail numbers warrant examination to guide future trial design in the post-remission setting. The addition of eltrombopag to high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy was well-tolerated and no DLTs were observed. The results for cohort 1 [eltrombopag 150 mg daily starting on day 3 of consolidation] demonstrated the fastest plt recovery. Further investigation is needed to define the optimal role, dose, and schedule of eltrombopag in the treatment of chemotherapy associated myelosuppression. Disclosures Strickland: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ambit: Consultancy; Baxalta: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutica: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Treatment of relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with idarubicin and intermediate-dose cytarabine.

1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
J L Harousseau ◽  
J Reiffers ◽  
P Hurteloup ◽  
N Milpied ◽  
H Guy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Optimal Dosage ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Myeloid

High-dose cytarabine (HDARA-C) is an effective but toxic treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In order to reduce the incidence of severe complications noted with HDARA-C-containing regimens, we used a combination of intravenous (IV) idarubicin (IDARUB) at optimal dosage and cytarabine (ARA-C) at intermediate dosage. Thirty-five patients aged 23 to 78 years (median, 56) with AML in first relapse received IDARUB, 8 mg/m2/d for five days, and ARA-C, 1 g/m2 every 12 hours for six doses. Of the 35 patients, 21 achieved a complete remission (CR), four had a partial remission (PR), four died in aplasia, and six were nonresponders. The only factor influencing the CR rate was the duration of the first CR (35% for patients relapsing before 16 months v 83% for patients relapsing after 16 months, P = .003). Mucositis was the most significant extrahematologic side effect. Diarrhea, skin toxicity, and hepatic disturbances were rare and mild. There was no cerebellar toxicity, even in 25 patients greater than 50 years of age. This regimen is effective and well tolerated even in elderly patients, and could be used either as induction or consolidation therapy for the treatment of AML.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document