Impact of Prior Therapy with Imatinib Mesylate on the Outcome of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for Chronic Myeloiod Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 738-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Lee ◽  
Richard Maziarz ◽  
Manisha Kukreja ◽  
Tao Wang ◽  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
...  

Abstract Imatinib mesylate (IM, Gleevec®) has largely supplanted allogeneic HCT as first line therapy for CML. Nevertheless, many persons with CML eventually undergo HCT raising the question of whether prior IM-therapy impacts HCT outcome. The effect of IM on HCT outcomes is unknown. Using data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) on 409 subjects treated with IM pretransplant (IM+) and 900 subjects who did not (IM-), we evaluated transplant-related mortality (TRM), acute graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD), leukemia relapse (defined as hematologic), leukemia-free survival (LFS) and survival. Transplants occurred from 1999–2003. Only data from centers that reported data on at least 80% of IM+ subjects which also concurrently treated IM- subjects were included to minimize potential bias. Because of population differences, results are presented separately for 1st chronic phase (CP1) and all other phases (> CP1). In both groups, IM+ subjects were transplanted more recently, had a longer interval from diagnosis to transplant, were more likely to receive peripheral blood than bone marrow, and to have unrelated donors. Within the CP1 group, 52% had planned to undergo transplant regardless of response to IM, while transplant was prompted by IM failure or no response in 37% and by IM intolerance in 9%. 52% of CP1 subjects received IM within a month of transplant. In CP1 subjects, IM-therapy prior to HCT was associated with better survival. Other significant factors associated with better survival in CP1 patients were better matched donor (p<0.0001), use of bone marrow (RR 0.66; p=0.002), and transplants < 1 year from diagnosis (RR 0.68; p=0.002). There was also a trend towards less TRM and more relapses; LFS was similar. Because of concern about possible selection biases, a matched-pairs analysis considering interval from diagnosis to HCT (+/− 3 mos), HLA-match, graft-type and sex-match was performed with 143 IM+ CP1 subjects and 236 IM- controls. Results confirmed a higher survival rate and less TRM in IM+ subjects. In subjects > CP1, use of IM before HCT was not associated with TRM, relapse, LFS or survival. Acute GVHD rates were similar between IM+ and IM- subjects regardless of leukemia phase. In summary, treatment with IM before HCT while in CP1 is associated with higher survival and trends towards less TRM and more hematologic relapses after transplant. In subjects > CP1, prior treatment with IM was associated with similar outcomes seen in patients not receiving IM before HCT. These results should be reassuring to patients receiving IM or CP1 patients contemplating a trial of IM before HCT. Stage Outcome RR 95% CI p-value CP1 Survival 0.63 0.46–0.88 0.006 LFS 0.89 0.68–1.15 0.36 TRM 0.70 0.49–0.98 0.04 Hematologic Relapse 1.54 1.02–2.35 0.04 Beyond CP1 Survival 0.93 0.74–1.18 0.57 LFS 1.05 0.84–1.32 0.67 TRM 0.87 0.64–1.18 0.35 Hematologic Relapse 1.35 0.95–1.89 0.09

Author(s):  
Jbireal JM ◽  
Azab Elsayed Azab ◽  
Alzahani S ◽  
Elshareef M

Background: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloid proliferative disorder of primitive haemopoietic progenitor cells. The incidence of CML ranges between 10 and 15 cases/106 /year without any major geographic or ethnic differences. Imatinib mesylate provides good results in the treatment of CML. Early studies demonstrated that Imatinib mesylate can produce clear hematologic and cytogenetic response when used as a treatment of CML patients with positive BCR-ABL gene. Nevertheless, some patient with different stages of CML (chronic, accelerated, or acute phases) either relapse or stay unchanged for a long time after initial doses of treatment. This phenomenon led to the fact that we must explore the possible changes expected to appear if we make some changes in the treatment strategy. Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate hematologic and molecular responses of CML patients to Imatinib mesylate treatment. Methods: Eighteen CML patients in chronic phase aged (24–65 years) males and females were treated with Imatinib mesylate (400, 500 or 600 mg/day) for sixteen months. Hematologic and cytogenetic changes were analyzed periodically. Results: Overall 18 cases, hematologic response of 14 cases was complete white blood cells (WBCs) decrease to normal range within 4 months) with P value of less than 0.0001 whereas in 4 cases WBCs were decreased slowly (after 8 months). A major cytogenetic response was noticed in 4 cases while in others the response was partially or in minor range. The major hematologic and cytogenetic response was noticed when using 600mg/day of Imatinib mesylate. The correlation appeared as a significant positive correlation between the treatment doses and Hb, hematocrit, MCV, MCH, esinophils%, and monocytes %. And a significant negative correlation between the treatment doses and RDW %, platelets count, WBCs count, and basophils %. On the other hand, no correlation between the treatment doses and RBCs Count, MCHC, Neutrophil % and BCR/APL ratio % Conclusion: It can be concluded that treatment of CML patients with Imatinib mesylate caused complete WBCs decrease to normal range. The major hematologic and cytogenetic response was noticed when using a higher dose of Imatinib mesylate.


Author(s):  
Andrew Retter

Bone marrow transplants are an exciting and rapidly evolving area of haematology providing life-saving therapy to many patients and the number performed annually is increasing. Transplants are generally not considered as first line therapy due to their inherent toxicity and high rate of complications. The patients tend to have more heavily pre-treated disease with it attendant toxicities and a decreased physiological reserve. Admission rates vary between series from 15 to 30%. It is increasingly important that intensivists are aware of the basic principles of bone marrow transplantation and its’ possible morbidities. There are two types of transplant autologous transplants, where the patient’s own stem cells are returned to them and transplants from a donor. Only allogeneic transplants are associated with graft-versus-host disease. Allograft recipients also require immunosuppression to prevent transplant rejection. It is essential that this immunosuppression is continued when patients are admitted to intensive care. Transplant patients are always severely immunocompromised and prone to prolonged periods of neutropenia. They routinely receive antiviral, antifungal, and antibacterial prophylaxis, which must be continued on their admission. They remain vulnerable to unusual infections presenting in an atypical fashion. It is essential to have both a very low clinical threshold of suspicion for infection and detailed local protocols established to guide empirical antimicrobial therapy. Although traditionally poor, the prognosis is slowly improving.


Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (11) ◽  
pp. 4047-4052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Lee ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Karen M. Kuntz ◽  
Jonathan Patten ◽  
Joseph H. Antin ◽  
...  

Abstract Unrelated donor transplantation prolongs survival in some patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. However, there are growing concerns about the intensive resources required for this procedure given health care budget constraints. To address this issue, we conducted a study of the costs and cost-effectiveness of unrelated donor transplantation for chronic phase CML. The costs of transplantation were derived from 157 patients from the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). Estimates of the effectiveness of transplantation were taken from our previous work using data from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the National Marrow Donor Program. The median cost of the first 6 months of care including donor identification, marrow collection, patient hospitalization for transplantation and all outpatient medications and readmissions through 6 months postmarrow infusion was $178,500 (range, $85,000 to $462,400) and the mean was $196,200. Mean costs for patients surviving beyond 6 months posttransplant were significantly lower than for patients dying within that period ($189,700 v $211,000, respectively,P = .03). Posttransplant follow-up costs were high for months 6 to 18, then decreased. The incremental cost-effectiveness of transplantation within 1 year of diagnosis versus -interferon therapy without transplant in the base case of a 35-year-old patient was $51,800/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that most ratios were between $50,000 to $100,000/QALY or within the intermediate zone of acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4883-4883
Author(s):  
Edward C. Copelan ◽  
Patrick Elder

Abstract The role of hematopoietic cell transplantation in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) has changed dramatically as the effectiveness of Gleevec has become clearer. The use of transplantation as first-line therapy and the timing of transplantation in those who do not achieve cytogenetic remission varies between centers. In order to better understand the likelihood of success following transplantation, we have analyzed prognostic factors in 126 patients with chronic phase CML who underwent allogeneic transplantation between 1984 and 2004. Median age was 37 (range 14–66). There were 69 males and 57 females. The interval between diagnosis and transplantation was most closely associated with survival in multivariate Cox analysis (P&lt;.001). Interval was significant when analyzed as a continuous variable; also patients transplanted within 3 months experienced significantly longer survival than those &gt; 3 months and patients less than 1 year from diagnosis had better survival than those more than 1 year from diagnosis. (P&lt;.001). Patients with fully matched sibling donors experienced significantly better survival that those with other donors (P=.01). Treatment with Interferon or Gleevec, age, use of peripheral blood cells vs marrow, and year of transplant were not significant prognostic factors. There is no evidence that age, which is often heavily considered in determining timing of transplantation, is a significant prognostic factor in patients with CML undergoing allogeneic transplantation after busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Because interval between diagnosis and transplantation significantly affects outcome, allogeneic transplantation should be considered early in patients receiving Gleevec when an adequate cytogenetic response is not achieved or at the first sign of relapse. Earlier identification of failure, e.g. using quantitative PCR for Bcr-Abl, might improve outcome and should be studied.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 501-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrike Bacher ◽  
Evgeny Klyuchnikov ◽  
Jeanette Carreras ◽  
Jennifer Le-Rademacher ◽  
Ginna G. Laport ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 501 Non-myeloablative (NMC) and reduced intensity (RIC) conditioning approaches rely primarily on a graft-vs-lymphoma (GVL) effect and aim at reducing transplant-related mortality (TRM) associated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC). We analyzed outcomes for 396 adults (228 male) receiving alloHCT for DLBCL following MAC (n=165), RIC (n=143) or NMC (n=88) regimens between 2000 and 2009 and reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). Conditioning regimens were classified using consensus criteria. Engraftment, cumulative incidences of acute and chronic graft-vs-host disease (GvHD), TRM, progression and probabilities of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between MAC and NMC/RIC. Common MAC regimens were cyclophosphamide (CY) + total body irradiation (TBI) (54%) and busulfan (BU) + CY (23%). Common RIC regimens were fludarabine (Flu) with melphalan (44%) or BU (39%) and for NMC, Flu with CY (48%) and low dose TBI (33%). Practice patterns changed with declining use of MAC regimens after 2003 (> 66% of total being MAC pre-2003 and <33% after). Donors were HLA matched siblings in 40%, 26%, 30% of MAC, RIC and NMC recipients, respectively, with 67% overall receiving unrelated donor (URD) grafts. Significant (p <0.05) baseline differences between the cohorts included: RIC and NMC recipients were older (54% and 58% >50 yrs vs 39% for MAC), more likely to have received prior autoHCT (36% and 51% vs 18%), prior radiation and more prior chemotherapy regimens (55 and 70% vs 44% with >3 regimens) than those with MAC. Recipients of RIC and NMC were less likely to have chemotherapy resistant disease (30% and 26% vs. 42% for MAC); and had a longer median interval from diagnosis to alloHCT (median 27 and 36 mo vs. 17 mo). Day 100 engraftment was more frequent in RIC and NMC recipients (99% and 97% with ANC >500/cu.mm vs. 88% for MAC, p <0.001). Acute (43–44%) and chronic GvHD incidence (37–42% at 5 years) was similar across the groups. Outcomes are summarized in Table 1. TRM at day +100 and at 5 years was significantly higher for MAC compared with RIC and NMC groups (See Table 1). Lymphoma relapse/progression at 5 years was significantly lower for MAC vs. RIC and NMC but 5 year PFS and OS at 5-years did not differ significantly. In multivariable analysis, NMC (HR 0.58, p=0.026) and later year of alloHCT (HR 0.49, p<0.001) were associated with lower TRM while Karnofsky status <90 (HR 1.51, p=0.011), chemo-resistant relapse (HR 2.79, p<0.001) and URD (HR 2.32, p<0.001) were associated with higher TRM. Higher incidence of relapse/progression was associated with NMC (HR 2.14, p=0.003), non-receipt of rituximab prior to alloHCT (HR 1.69, p=0.008) and chemo-resistant disease (HR 2.06, p=0.006). Conditioning intensity did not impact OS and PFS. In selected patients with advanced DLBCL, allogeneic HCT can induce long-term PFS irrespective of the intensity of conditioning with a lower incidence of TRM with RIC and NMC regimens. Due to increased toxicity, the use of MAC regimens has been declining in recent years. However, the incidence of RIC/NMC, risk of relapse/progression was concordantly higher in the RIC/NMC recipients so that survival did not differ significantly between conditioning regimens. Further studies are needed to clarify optimal conditioning strategies for advanced DLBCL aiming to further reduce TRM. Table 1: Parameter Intensity of Conditioning (95% CI) p-value MAC RIC NMC TRM @day +100 at 5 yrs 32% (25–39%) 24% (17–31%) 17% (10–26%) 0.029 56% (48–64%) 47% (38–56%) 36% (26–46%) 0.007 Relapse @ 5 yrs 26% (19–33%) 38% (30–46%) 40% (30–50%) 0.031 OS @ 5 yrs 18% (12–25%) 20% (13–29%) 26% (17–36%) 0.365 PFS @ 5 yrs 18% (12–24%) 15% (9–23%) 25% (16–34%) 0.309 Disclosures: Montoto: Genentech: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (11) ◽  
pp. 4047-4052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Lee ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Karen M. Kuntz ◽  
Jonathan Patten ◽  
Joseph H. Antin ◽  
...  

Unrelated donor transplantation prolongs survival in some patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. However, there are growing concerns about the intensive resources required for this procedure given health care budget constraints. To address this issue, we conducted a study of the costs and cost-effectiveness of unrelated donor transplantation for chronic phase CML. The costs of transplantation were derived from 157 patients from the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). Estimates of the effectiveness of transplantation were taken from our previous work using data from the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry and the National Marrow Donor Program. The median cost of the first 6 months of care including donor identification, marrow collection, patient hospitalization for transplantation and all outpatient medications and readmissions through 6 months postmarrow infusion was $178,500 (range, $85,000 to $462,400) and the mean was $196,200. Mean costs for patients surviving beyond 6 months posttransplant were significantly lower than for patients dying within that period ($189,700 v $211,000, respectively,P = .03). Posttransplant follow-up costs were high for months 6 to 18, then decreased. The incremental cost-effectiveness of transplantation within 1 year of diagnosis versus -interferon therapy without transplant in the base case of a 35-year-old patient was $51,800/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analysis showed that most ratios were between $50,000 to $100,000/QALY or within the intermediate zone of acceptable cost-effectiveness ratios.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document