High Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections in Adult Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1136-1136
Author(s):  
Winnie Ma ◽  
Dawn Warkentin ◽  
Janice Yeung ◽  
John D Shepherd ◽  
Yasser Abou Mourad ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1136 Poster Board I-158 Introduction Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients. Prophylaxis of high risk patient groups has become a key strategy in managing these infections, which are characteristically difficult to pre-emptively diagnose. The benefit of newer prophylactic agents depends in part on the local incidence of IFI in a population. This study was carried out to define the incidence of IFI in a cohort of HSCT patients treated by the Leukemia/Bone Marrow Transplant Program of British Columbia, to elucidate risk factors for IFI and to assess the efficacy of our current prophylaxis strategy. Methods Two hundred and forty-nine adult HSCT patients who underwent autologous or allogeneic transplantation between October 2006 and March 2008 were retrospectively evaluated. One hundred and eighty patients underwent high dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT during this period. The indication for HSCT in this group was predominantly multiple myeloma (n=95; 53%) or non-Hodgkins lymphoma (n=59; 32.8%). Sixty-nine patients underwent allogeneic HSCT using a related sibling (n=46) or matched unrelated (n=23) donor. The predominant indication for allogeneic HSCT was acute leukemia/ myelodysplasia (48%), followed by non-Hodgkins lymphoma (25%) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (12%). Patients enrolled in prophylaxis clinical trials or with previously documented IFI were excluded from analysis. Routine antifungal prophylaxis with low dose amphotericin B (10mg/m2/day) for inpatients and oral fluconazole (400mg/day) for outpatients was given during the neutropenic phase throughout the period of the study. Results The overall incidence of proven, probable or possible IFI was 2.2% (4/180) and 19% (13/69) in autologous and allogeneic HSCT groups, respectively. The median time to IFI in autologous HSCT recipients was 12.5 days (7-19) post transplantation. In allogeneic HSCT patients, a bimodal incidence of IFI was observed with the first peak occurring within the first 30 days of transplantation and a later peak after 100 days. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) was the predominant IFI encountered (82%); the remaining IFI were due to invasive candidiasis (IC). The incidence of IA was 1.7% (3/180) and 16% (11/69) in autologous and allogeneic HSCT patients. Mortality attributable to fungal infection was 18% (3/17) and all deaths were cases of IA occurring in the allogeneic HSCT group. Modification of antifungal prophylaxis occurred in 23% of patients. Indications for changes in prophylaxis included: initiation of empiric therapy for suspected infection (18%), change to an orally active agent to facilitate discharge from hospital (12%), nephrotoxicity (14%) or infusion reactions (2%). Patients who developed IFI were more likely to have received prolonged high-dose corticosteroid therapy (i.e. prednisone >7.5mg daily for 3 weeks or more) for graft-versus-host disease (82% in IFI vs. 24% in non-IFI, p<0.001). Patients who received alemtuzumab or fludarabine as part of the conditioning regimen were also more likely to develop IFI (23% in IFI vs. 1.3% in non-IFI, p<0.001) and (23% in IFI vs. 6% in non-IFI, p=0.005), respectively. IFI patients were more likely to have received total parenteral nutrition during the peritransplant course (47% in IFI vs. 18% non-IFI, p<0.001). Conclusion Invasive fungal infections occurred in 19% of allogeneic HSCT recipients with an attributable mortality of 18%. IFI is less concerning in autologous HSCT recipients, occurring in 2% of cases. The predominant infection of concern is invasive aspergillosis in our population. Patients should receive prophylaxis during the neutropenic phase following allogeneic HSCT; those who develop graft-versus-host disease requiring prolonged steroid therapy should be particularly targeted for antifungal prophylaxis with mould-active antifungal agents. The role of T cell suppression in conditioning therapy and the influence of TPN exposure on the incidence of IFI is an area which warrants further study in defining specific risk groups for costly and potentially toxic prophylactic therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

10.36469/9832 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-161
Author(s):  
Santiago Grau ◽  
Carlos Solano ◽  
Carol García-Vidal ◽  
Isidro Jarque ◽  
Jon A. Barrueta ◽  
...  

Objectives: Compare the cost of the primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections (IFI) with voriconazole, posaconazole, and micafungin in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in hospitals of the National Health System (NHS) in Spain. Methods: A cost analysis was made for 100 days and 180 days of prophylaxis and a decision tree model was developed. The efficacy rate of IFI prophylaxis and survival rate with liposomal amphotericin B treatment of prophylaxis failures were obtained from randomized trials and a meta-analysis of mixed treatment comparisons. The model simulation was interrupted with IFI treatment (prophylaxis failures). The costs of medication and its intravenous administration in the hospital (in the case of micafungin) were considered. Results: In the non-modeled analysis, the savings per patient of prophylaxis with voriconazole ranged from €1,709 to €9,655 compared with posaconazole oral solution, from €1,811 to €9,767 compared with posaconazole gastro-resistant tablets and from €3,376 to €7,713 compared with micafungin. In the modeled analysis, the mean cost per patient of the prophylaxis and treatment of IFIs was €6,987 to €7,619 with voriconazole, €7,749 with posaconazole, and €22,424 with micafungin. Therefore, the savings per patient of prophylaxis with voriconazole was €130 to €3,664 and €11,132 to €30,374 compared with posaconazole and micafungin, respectively. The result remained stable after modification of the number of days of antifungal prophylaxis and the cost of antifungal treatment of failures. Conclusion: Taking into account this model, antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole in recipients of hematopoietic progenitor transplants, compared with posaconazole or micafungin, may represent savings for hospitals in Spain.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S75-S75
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W Jansen ◽  
Anupam Pande ◽  
Rizwan Romee ◽  
Steven J Lawrence ◽  
William Powderly

Abstract Background Invasive fungal infections (IFI) remain a serious complication in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients and are associated with increased costs, morbidity, and mortality. Posaconazole (PCZ) and voriconazole (VCZ) are frequently utilized as antifungal prophylaxis in this population. To date, no direct comparison between PCZ and VCZ exists for the prevention of IFI in adult HSCT patients. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of HSCT patients aged ≥18 years who received ≥28 continuous days of primary (PPPx) or secondary (SPPx) antifungal prophylaxis with either VCZ or PCZ between February 26, 2003 and September 30, 2015 at Barnes-Jewish Hospital was conducted. Patients who received PPPx or SPPx with both VCZ and PCZ were analyzed following intention to treat of the initial agent received. Patients who received both PPPx and SPPx were included once for both PPPx and SPPx. The primary outcome of interest was development of possible, probable, or proven IFI as defined by EORTC/MSG guidelines. In the SPPx patients, development of IFI was confirmed as a distinct event from primary IFI based on manual chart review and radiographic evidence. Results Overall, there were 472 patients included; 402 in the VCZ group and 70 in the PCZ group. At baseline, patients in the PCZ group had more graft vs. host disease (GVHD) prior to prophylaxis (27.1% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.04) and were more likely to be on SPPx (60% vs. 41%, P &lt; 0.01). There were 22 and 1 IFI events in the VCZ and PCZ groups, respectively, which corresponded to a crude incidence rate of 0.345 and 0.077 per 1000 person-days of prophylaxis. Figure 1 displays the Cox proportional hazard model which was completed in the backwards stepwise method accounting for gender, transplant type, GVHD prior to prophylaxis, disease remission, and PPPx or SPPX. The hazard ratio for development of IFI while on prophylaxis between VCZ and PCZ was 5.22 (95% CI: 0.69–39.4; P = 0.11) after controlling for PPPx or SPPx. Conclusion There was not a significant difference between rates of IFI in HSCT patients who received antifungal prophylaxis with VCZ compared with PCZ. Our data trends towards favoring PCZ but is limited by low rates of IFI. Larger, prospective analyses are necessary to confirm our findings. Disclosures W. Powderly, Merck: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant. Gilead: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Astellas: Grant Investigator, Research grant


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 347
Author(s):  
Carmine Liberatore ◽  
Francesca Farina ◽  
Raffaella Greco ◽  
Fabio Giglio ◽  
Daniela Clerici ◽  
...  

Despite the recent introduction of mold-active antifungal prophylaxis (MAP), breakthrough invasive fungal infections (b-IFI) still represent a possible complication and a cause of morbidity and mortality in hematological patients and allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients (HSCT). Data on incidence and type of b-IFI are limited, although they are mainly caused by non-fumigatus Aspergillus and non-Aspergillus molds and seem to depend on specific antifungal prophylaxis and patients’ characteristics. Herein, we described the clinical presentation and management of two cases of rare b-IFI which recently occurred at our institution in patients undergoing HSCT and receiving MAP. The management of b-IFI is challenging due to the lack of data from prospective trials and high mortality rates. A thorough analysis of risk factors, ongoing antifungal prophylaxis, predisposing conditions and local epidemiology should drive the choice of antifungal treatments. Early broad-spectrum preemptive therapy with a lipid formulation of amphotericin-B, in combination with a different mold-active azole plus/minus terbinafine, is advisable. The therapy would cover against rare azole-susceptible and -resistant fungal strains, as well as atypical sites of infections. An aggressive diagnostic work-up is recommended for species identification and subsequent targeted therapy.


Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 827-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Fukuda ◽  
Michael Boeckh ◽  
Rachel A. Carter ◽  
Brenda M. Sandmaier ◽  
Michael B. Maris ◽  
...  

Abstract The incidence of invasive mold infections has increased during the 1990s among patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) after myeloablative conditioning. In this study, we determined risk factors for invasive mold infection and mold infection-related death among 163 patients undergoing allogeneic HCT with nonmyeloablative conditioning. The cumulative incidence rates of proven or probable invasive fungal infections, invasive mold infections, invasive aspergillosis, and invasive candidiasis during the first year after allogeneic HCT with nonmyeloablative conditioning were 19%, 15%, 14%, and 5%, respectively, which were similar to those after conventional myeloablative HCT. Invasive mold infections occurred late after nonmyeloablative conditioning (median, day 107), with primary risk factors including severe acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), chronic extensive GVHD, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. The 1-year survival after diagnosis of mold infections was 32%. High-dose corticosteroid therapy at diagnosis of mold infection was associated with an increased risk for mold infection–related death. Overall, nonrelapse mortality was estimated at 22% (36 patients) after nonmyeloablative conditioning, of which 39% (14 patients) were mold infection-related (9% of the overall mortality). More effective strategies are needed to prevent invasive mold infections, which currently account for a notable proportion of nonrelapse mortality after nonmyeloablative allogeneic HCT.


Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 2768-2776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco M. Marty ◽  
Stephanie J. Lee ◽  
Michelle M. Fahey ◽  
Edwin P. Alyea ◽  
Robert J. Soiffer ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It has been proposed that tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) blockade with infliximab may be an effective treatment for severe (grades III-IV) GVHD. We determined if infliximab use in this high-risk population was associated with an additional increased risk of non-Candida invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Records of the 2000-2001 HSCT cohort at our institution were reviewed. Fifty-three (20%) of 264 evaluable patients developed severe GVHD and 11 of these 53 (21%) received infliximab for treatment. Proven or probable IFI was documented in 10 (19%) of 53 patients with severe GVHD (incidence rate of 0.99 cases/1000 GVHD patient-days). When stratified by infliximab use, 5 of 11 infliximab recipients developed an IFI (6.78 cases/1000 GVHD patient-days), compared with 5 of 42 IFI cases among nonrecipients (0.53 cases/1000 GVHD patient-days). In a time-dependent Cox regression model among patients with severe GVHD, the adjusted IFI hazard ratio of infliximab exposure was 13.6 (P = .004; 95% CI, 2.29-80.2). We conclude that infliximab administration is associated with a significantly increased risk of non-Candida IFI in HSCT recipients with severe GVHD disease. Pre-emptive systemic antifungal therapy against molds should be considered in patients who develop severe GVHD after HSCT if infliximab is used.


Author(s):  
Alessandro Busca ◽  
Natascia Cinatti ◽  
Jessica Gill ◽  
Roberto Passera ◽  
Chiara Maria Dellacasa ◽  
...  

BackgroundAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients are exposed to an increased risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) due to neutropenia, immunosuppressive treatments, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and incomplete immune reconstitution. Although clinical benefit from antifungal prophylaxis has been demonstrated, IFIs remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. In the last decades, attention has also been focused on potential risk factors for IFI to tailor an antifungal prevention strategy based on risk stratification.Aim of the StudyThis retrospective single-center study aimed to assess the epidemiology and the prognostic factors of IFI in a large cohort of allo-HSCT patients.MethodsBetween January 2004 and December 2020, 563 patients with hematological malignancies received an allo-HSCT at the Stem Cell Transplant Unit in Turin: 191 patients (34%) received grafts from a matched sibling donor, 284 (50.5%) from a matched unrelated donor, and 87 (15.5%) from an haploidentical family member. The graft source was peripheral blood in 81.5% of the patients. Our policy for antifungal prophylaxis included fluconazole in matched related and unrelated donors, while micafungin was administered in patients receiving haploidentical transplant. According to this practice, fluconazole was administered in 441 patients (79.6%) and micafungin in 62 (11.2%), while only 9 patients received mold-active prophylaxis. Galactomannan testing was routinely performed twice a week; patients with persisting fever unresponsive to broad spectrum antibiotics were evaluated with lung high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan. In case of imaging suggestive of IFI, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed whenever feasible.Statistical AnalysisOnly probable/proven IFI (PP-IFI) occurring during the first 12 months after transplant have been evaluated. IFIs were classified as probable or proven according to the new revised European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Mycoses Study Group (MSG) consensus criteria. Multivariate competing risk regression, binary logistic, and proportional hazard models were performed to identify risk factors for PP-IFI.ResultsA total of 58 PP-IFIs (n = 47 probable; n = 11 proven) occurred in our patients resulting in a cumulative incidence of 4.1%, 8.1%, and 9.6% at 30, 180, and 365 days, respectively. Molds were the predominant agents (n = 50 Aspergillus; n = 1 Mucor), followed by invasive candidemia (n = 5 non-albicans Candida; n = 1 Candida albicans; n = 1 Trichosporon). Lung was the most frequent site involved in patients with mold infections (47/51, 92.2%). Median time from HSCT to IFI was 98.44 days (0–365 days). Only 34.5% of patients with IFI were neutropenic at the time of infection. The presence of IFI had a significant impact on overall survival at 1 year (IFI, 32.8% vs. non-IFI, 54.6%; p &lt; 0.001). IFI-related mortality rate was 20.7% in the overall population, 17% in patients with probable IFI, and 36% in patients with proven IFI. Multivariate competing risk regression revealed that donor type was the factor significantly associated to the risk of IFI [subdistribution hazard ratio (SDHR), 1.91, IC 1.13–3.20; p = 0.015]. BAL was informative in a consistent number of cases (36/57, 63.2%) leading to the identification of fungal (21), bacterial (4), viral (3), and polymicrobial (8) infections. Overall, 79 patients (14%) received a diagnostic-driven treatment, and 63 patients (11.2%) received a fever-driven treatment. Liposomal amphoteric B was the drug used in the majority of patients receiving diagnostic-driven therapy (30/79, 38%), while caspofungin was administered more frequently in patients who received a fever-driven strategy (27/63, 42.9%).ConclusionAccording to our experience, a non-mold active prophylaxis in patients undergoing allo-HSCT is feasible when combined with an intensive diagnostic work-up including CT scan and BAL. BAL performed at the onset of the disease may provide informative results in most patients. A diagnostic-driven treatment strategy may contribute to limit the use of costly antifungal therapies.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5375-5375
Author(s):  
Veronika Valkova ◽  
Antonin Vitek ◽  
Edgar Faber ◽  
Jiri Mayer ◽  
Pavel Zak ◽  
...  

Abstract -Background: New chemotherapeutics protocols, included high dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and anti-CD20 therapy may be curative for many patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). However in some cases, standard approach, including autologous HSCT fails. Allogeneic HSCT (allo-SCT) may be effective, however is still associated with high treatment-related mortality (TRM). We report here a retrospective analysis of allogeneic SCT in pts with NHL reported to the Czech National Registry of SCT from four centers in years 1999–2005. Methods: We analysed 57 patients with NHL (41 males, 16 females). Histological subtypes were: diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLBCL), n=16, follicular lymphoma (FL), n= 17, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), n=8, peripheral T-cell lymphoma, n=7, Burkitt’s lymphoma, n=2 and 7 other unspecified lymphomas. Median age was 50 (19–64) years. Donors were identical siblings in 40 pts (70%) or unrelated volunteers in 17 (30%). Six (11%) pts received bone marrow and 51 (89%) received PBPC. Forty-three (75%) pts received reduce-intensity conditioning (RIC), fourteen (25%) were treated with conventional myeloablative regimen. Twenty-five (44%) patients had previous autologous HSCT. At time of allo-HSCT, thirty-eight (67%) pts had chemosensitive disease, thirteen (23%) were considered as chemoresistant (six were untested). Interval from diagnosis to SCT ranged from 9,5 to 198 months with median 21 months. Results: All pts but one engrafted. Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) occurred in 18 (31%) pts (11× grade I–II, 7× grade III–IV). Of the 35 evaluable patients sixteen (46%) developed chronic GVHD (12× limited, 4× extensive). The 100-day, 1-year and 3-years TRM rates were 30%, 39% and 42% respectively. Relapse or progression was observed in 26%. With a median folow-up of 31 months (range, 4–108) of living patients, the actuarial overall survival (OS) rates at 3 years were 36%, progression free survival (PFS) 36% and relaps risk 41 %. The 3-years OS rates of patients with DLCL, FCL and MCL were 15%, 53% and 31% respectively. Patients after prior ASCT had significantly less outcome (3-year OS 16% vs 51%, p=0,04). There was not found the correlation between GVHD and relapse rate, the outcome of pts treated with myeloablative regimen and RIC was not significantly different (3-year OS 46% vs 36%, relaps risk 20% vs 47%, p=0,4). There was no diference in OS between related and unrelated transplants (3-year OS 40% vs 35%, p=0,16). We didn’t observe significant diference between pts transplanted in chemosensitive or chemoresistant disease (3-year OS resp PFS 43% vs 23%, p=0,09, resp 39% vs 31%, p=0,14) At time of last follow-up 32 patients were dead and 25 were alive (22 in complete remission). Conclusion: Allogeneic HSCT represents an effective therapeutic option for patients with poor prognosis NHL, however TRM remains the problem as well as high relapse risk in some cases. RIC may be an option for erderly patients but it’s not clear if it offers the same effectivity as standard myeloablative regimen. Transplants from unrelated donors may be probably considered comparable to related.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-226
Author(s):  
Annie Bui ◽  
Veronica Nguyen ◽  
Christina Hsu ◽  
Ben Hyde ◽  
Tiffany Simms-Waldrip

OBJECTIVE This study aimed to report the incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients who received voriconazole, liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), or micafungin for primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP). METHODS Using data retrospectively collected from institution's electronic records, this study analyzed the incidence of IFIs in pediatric HSCT patients between November 2012 and November 2016. RESULTS A total of 103 patients were screened. Of the 84 patients who met inclusion criteria, 76.2%, 29.8%, and 19% patients received voriconazole, L-AMB, and micafungin, respectively. The incidence of overall IFIs was 2.08 per 1000 prophylaxis days. There were 2 mold infections identified in 2 patients. Among 3 antifungal agents, the rates of IFIs were 2.67 per 1000 prophylaxis days in L-AMB group, 2.08 per 1000 prophylaxis days in micafungin group, and 1.17 per 1000 prophylaxis days in voriconazole group. CONCLUSION Patients who received L-AMB or micafungin had higher rates of IFIs than those who received voriconazole for PAP.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S635-S635
Author(s):  
Mayra Estacio ◽  
Joaquin Rosales ◽  
Francisco Jaramillo ◽  
Ana-Maria Sanz ◽  
Juan D Vélez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Invasive fungal infections (IFI) are significant causes of morbidity and mortality among patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Primary antifungal prophylaxis has lowered the IFI cases however there is no clear guidance regarding which mold active agent is most useful if mold-active prophylaxis. We aim to present the incidence of IFI in patients with allogeneic HSCT, and the impact of primary antifungal prophylaxis regimen. Methods Retrospective cohort study. We included patients older than 18 years, with allogeneic HSCT from Fundación Valle del Lili, between January 2008 and April 2017. The patients received antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole, itraconazole, or posaconazole from conditioning day to +100 post-transplant day. The prophylactic antifungal agent was selected according to the initial diagnosis, transplant type, conditioning regimen and the risk of developing GVHD. All patients received myeloablative conditioning regimens and were hospitalized in laminar airflow rooms during their period with neutropenia. The cases were defined according to the EORTC/MSG Consensus Group. We analyzed patients with probable or confirmed IFI, in the first 120 post-transplant days. Results We enrolled a total of 101 patients who received HSCT over the course of the study. The median age was 32 (23–43). Posaconazole prophylaxis was used in 73%, fluconazole in 18% and itraconazole 10% of the patients. The IFI incidence was 3.9% (4 cases) and the median time from HSCT to the diagnosis of IFI was 60 days. The percentages of patients who experienced probable IFI in the itraconazole arm was 22% (2/9 patients) and in the fluconazole arm 11.1% (2/18), there was no infection in the posaconazole group (P = 0.001). Donor sources were HLA-matched sibling (42%), Haploidentical (48%), and cord blood (10%). The cumulative incidence of grade I–IV aGVHD was 63.4% and that of grade III–IV aGVHD was 37.5%. Conclusion In patients undergoing HSCT posaconazole prevented invasive fungal infections more effectively than did either fluconazole or itraconazole. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4338-4338
Author(s):  
Michaela Döring ◽  
Karin Melanie Cabanillas Stanchi ◽  
Manon Queudeville ◽  
Judith Feucht ◽  
Patrick Schlegel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Invasive Aspergillosis and Candidiasis are some of the major infectious complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with an incidence between 10 - 30% and an associated mortality rate between 50 - 90%. Posaconazole is an extended spectrum triazole with clinical activity against Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., Zygomycetes, Fusarium spp. and other rare causes of invasive fungal infections such as Cryptococcus neoformans and Histoplasma capulatum. Due to the excellent results regarding efficacy, safety and feasibility that were shown in prospective studies in adults, we have been using posaconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients for several years now. Bioavailability of posaconazole suspension is impaired by low gastrointestinal resorption due to its lipophilicity. Investigations on adult patients after HSCT have shown that posaconazole resorption depends strongly on the gastric conditions, e.g. intestinal graft-versus-host disease, fat uptake during drug administration, or concomitant medication such as proton pump inhibitors, However, there is insufficient data on the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in pediatric patients. This single-center analysis evaluated the pharmacokinetic properties as well as efficacy, safety, and feasibility of posaconazole during the initial four weeks of oral antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric and adolescent patients after allogeneic HSCT. Methods: 31 patients with hemato-oncological malignancies with a median age of 6 years (range 6 months - 17.6 years) received posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis after allogeneic HSCT during the post-transplant period. The posaconazole trough levels were measured for all patients included in this analysis on day 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, day 14±1, and day 28±3 after the first intake of posaconazole suspension. The median observation period was 109 days (range 39 - 206 days), and the median treatment period was 97 days (range 25 - 192 days). Results: No proven, probable or possible fungal infection according to the EORTC/MSG guidelines was observed in the analyzed patient group. A total of 158 posaconazole trough levels were evaluated. During the first five days after start with posaconazole oral prophylaxis, the posaconazole trough level increased continuously. Median posaconazole levels registered 70.5 ng/mL (mean 78.89±50.19 ng/mL) on day 2, 133 ng/mL (mean 156.2±80.5 ng/mL) on day 3, and 209 ng/ml (mean 259.2±184.2 ng/mL) on day 5. Four weeks after start with oral posaconazole prophylaxis, the posaconazole level was at median 633.5 ng/mL (mean 731.7±407.8 ng/mL; range 290 - 1664 ng/mL). These values were significantly higher in comparison to the posaconazole levels on day 10 (P=0.016) with median 324 ng/mL (mean 446.7±350.8 ng/mL; range 104- 1581 ng/mL), and on day 7 (P=0.007) with median 252 ng/mL (mean 390.1±459.7 ng/mL; range 54 - 2441 ng/mL). On day 14 after start of antifungal prophylaxis the posaconazole plasma concentrations reached a stable level with a median of 529 ng/mL (mean 643.3±493.3 ng/mL; range 115 - 2081 ng/mL), and revealed no significant difference (P=0.24) in comparison to values analyzed four weeks after the start with posaconazole. The rates of potentially clinical drug related adverse events were very low. There was a significant transient increase (P<0.001) of transaminases ALT and AST during prophylaxis. Conclusions: Posaconazole suspension is effective in preventing invasive fungal infections in pediatric patients. 58% of the samples showed a sufficient posaconazole concentration above 500 ng/mL on day 14. 72% showed a sufficient posaconazole concentration four weeks after start with posaconazole prophylaxis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document