Oral Cyclic Melphalan and Dexamethasone in the Treatment of Patients with AL Amyloidosis; Ineligible for High-Dose Melphalan and Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1883-1883
Author(s):  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
David C. Seldin ◽  
John Mark Sloan ◽  
John L. Berk ◽  
Martha Skinner
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cardiac Involvement ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Plasma Cell Dyscrasia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant

Abstract Abstract 1883 Poster Board I-906 AL amyloidosis is caused by a clonal plasma cell dyscrasia and is characterized by widespread, progressive amyloid deposition leading to multisystem organ failure and death. In this disease, amyloid protein deposits are derived from monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains. Aggressive treatment of AL amyloidosis with high dose intravenous melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) is effective in inducing hematologic remission and clinical improvement. However, only selected patients with AL amyloidosis are eligible for HDM/SCT due to amyloid-associated organ dysfunction. Recently, several investigators have demonstrated the efficacy of treatment with oral cyclic melphalan and dexamethasone (Mel/Dex) in inducing hematologic responses and improving survival for patients with AL amyloidosis. We report on 70 patients with AL amyloidosis who were treated with oral Mel/Dex. Oral melphalan was administered at 0.22 mg/kg/day for D1-4 and dexamethasone at 20-40 mg one day per week and repeated every month. The median age was 65 years (range, 46-84) and the median number of organ system involvement was 3 (range, 1–6). Majority of the patients (n=31) had predominant cardiac involvement. The reasons to select this regimen of Mel/Dex rather than HDM/SCT included severe cardiac involvement (n=23), age > 75 years (n=6), patient choice (n=6), severe autonomic neuropathy (n=6), poor functional status (n=5), treatment started by local physicians (n=9), complications of stem cell mobilization and collection precluding HDM (n=5) and others (n=11). Patients received a median of 4 cycles of Mel/Dex, (range 1-13). Hematologic responses were not evaluable in 22 patients due to early death, toxicity or patients failing to return for follow-up. Of 48 evaluable patients, 7 patients (15%) achieved a complete hematologic response. Median survival for these 70 patients has not yet been reached with a median follow-up of 17 months. Overall survival is 60% at 3 years. Thirteen of these patients received additional treatment for their disease. In conclusion, oral cyclic melphalan and dexamethasone can lead to hematologic complete responses in 15% of patients and to improvement in survival for patients with AL amyloidosis, who are not eligible for HDM/SCT. Disclosures: relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Second Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with High Dose Melphalan (HDM/SCT) in Patients Relapsing After An Initial Course of HDM/SCT for the Treatment of AL Amyloidosis.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2318-2318
Author(s):  
Karen Quillen ◽  
David C. Seldin ◽  
Kathleen T. Finn ◽  
Vaishali Sanchorawala
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Plasma Cell Dyscrasia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Abstract 2318 Poster Board II-295 High-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) can induce complete hematologic responses (CR), defined as disappearance of the underlying monoclonal gammopathy from serum and urine by immunofixation electrophoresis, and of the clonal plasma cell dyscrasia by bone marrow immunohistochemistry, and extend survival in patients with AL amyloidosis. HDM/SCT results in a CR in 40% of patients, and leads to clinical improvements in organ function in >70% of those who achieve a CR. However, hematologic and clinical relapses occur in ∼8% of patients who initially achieve a CR. Tandem cycles of HDM/SCT, which are typically performed within 12 months of each other, have been shown to achieve a higher ultimate CR rate of >60%. Among patients who do not achieve a CR following a single cycle of HDM/SCT, 30% nonetheless experience improvement in organ function. However, in this latter group, clinical improvement is not durable. We designed a study to explore the feasibility, and efficacy, of a second cycle of HDM/SCT in patients who relapse after initially responding to a first cycle of HDM/SCT. Results: Eleven patients, median age 55 (range 39-62), M:F 7:4, who had achieved hematologic and clinical responses after an initial cycle of HDM/SCT, were treated with a second cycle of HDM/SCT when a hematologic and/or clinical relapse occurred after a median time interval of 34 months (range 12-63). Five patients underwent a second course of G-CSF mobilization and a mean of 5.1 million (range 3.4-7.6 million) CD34 cells/kg was collected in a median of 2 days; the other patients had cells saved from the first mobilization. Six patients received 200 mg/m2 HDM; 5 patients received modified high-dose HDM at 140 mg/m2. Engraftment occurred at a median of 10 days for neutrophils, and 12 days for platelets (two days without platelet transfusion support); this engraftment timing is similar to that following the initial transplants (10 days for neutrophils, 13 days for platelets). There was no treatment-related mortality, but toxicity was moderate; almost all patients (except one) experienced grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicities. Of the 11 patients, 3 achieved hematologic CR at one year; these patients are alive and in continuous remission at 2-6 yr after the second transplant, including one patient who received a subsequent renal transplant. Three patients died of progressive disease at 1-2 years after the second transplant. Five patients are alive at 1-3 years post second transplant, in partial remission. Conclusion: 27% (3/11) of patients with AL amyloidosis who experience a hematologic or clinical relapse after responding to initial HDM/SCT can achieve a hematologic CR with a second course of HDM/SCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Induction Therapy with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis: Our Experience

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5907-5907
Author(s):  
Sandeep Jain ◽  
Luciano J Costa ◽  
Robert K Stuart ◽  
Saurabh Chhabra ◽  
Alice Mims ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cardiac Involvement ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Introduction: The optimal treatment approach for systemic AL amyloidosis remains unclear. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the only modality associated with long term survival, but failure to show survival benefit in randomized clinical trial raises doubts about its efficacy 1, 2. Outcomes after ASCT are better in patients who achieve complete hematologic response after the ASCT3. One report has shown improved outcomes with combining one dose of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib with high dose melphalan as part of conditioning regimen 4. Preliminary data from a recent study suggest that the outcome of treating AL amyloidosis with two cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone followed by ASCT was superior to the outcome of the ASCT alone5. We describe our experience with giving 4-6 cycles of bortezomib and dexamethasone induction prior to high dose melphalan and ASCT in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis. Patients and methods: We included all patients who underwent autologous transplant for symptomatic systemic AL amyloidosis at our institution from October 2010 till June 2014. Five patients were included in the analysis and patient characteristics are described in table 1. All patient received 4 -6 cycles of induction with bortezomib and dexamethasone followed by autologous stem cell transplant using high dose melphalan (200 mg/m2). One patient also received six cycles of lenalidomide and dexamethasone prior to bortezomib based induction for lack of response. Hematologic and organ response were assessed using the definitions from the 10th International symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis. Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan Meyer’s method using Graphpad Prism 6.0 software. Results: There was no transplant related mortality. After median follow up of 13 months (12-25 months) all patient are alive. Toxicities from the ASCT were mostly cytopenias in the immediate post-transplant period which were managed as per the standard of care. Two patients achieved hematological complete response while one more had very good partial response and other two achieved partial response. Of the four patients with nephrotic range proteinuria, two patients had > 95% reduction in proteinuria, one had > 75% reduction in proteinuria and another patient had > 50% reduction in proteinuria. One patient had Liver involvement with elevated alkaline phosphatase which normalized post-transplant (table 2). The responses were maintained on last follow up and none of the patient had hematological or organ relapses. Discussion: Bortezomib alone and in combination with steroids has shown efficacy in AL amyloidosis, but its role in induction prior to high dose melphalan/ASCT to help achieve deeper hematological response is unknown. Our experience shows that this combination may be highly efficacious without significant toxicity. Limitations of our study include the small number of patients and absence of any patients with cardiac involvement, which is a worse prognostic marker. We conclude that the bortezomib and dexamethasone induction followed by high dose melphalan/ASCT for AL amyloidosis should be studied in prospective trials. Table 1.Patient Characteristics n=5Age, years 51.2 (44-62)Race (Caucasian)4 (80%)Gender ( female)3 (60%)Cardiac involvement 0 (0)Renal involvement 4 (80%)Serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 0 (0)Organ involvement ≥21 (20%)BM plasma cells > 10%1 (20%)Hgb ≤ 10 g/dl0 (0)LVEF <50%0 (0)Induction therapy Bortezomib/dexamethasone only4 (80%)Lenalidomide/dexamethasone + Bortezomib/dexamethasone1 (20%) Table 2. Outcomes n=5 Baseline After ASCT Hematologic response n=5 M protein 0.772 gm/dl 0.096 gm/dl 2 CR, 1 VGPR, 2 PR Renal response n=4 24 hours proteinuria 3.13 gm 0.432 gm 2 > 95% reduction, 1 >75% reduction, 1 >50 % reduction. Liver response n=1 Alkaline phosphatase 700 IU/L 62 IU/L Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Refractory to One Cycle of High Dose Cytarabine-Based Induction Chemotherapy.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1038-1038
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

Abstract Abstract 1038 Poster Board I-60 Background: Outcome of patients (pts) with AML refractory to initial induction is assumed to be poor but the available data is limited. Furthermore, pts refractory to standard dose cytarabine-based regimens may be salvaged with high dose ara-C (HiDaC, defined as daily ara-C dose ≥ 1 g/m2). Information on the outcome of pts refractory to initial HiDaC - based induction is more limited. Aim To better characterize predictors of poor response to HiDaC-based induction and to evaluate the outcome of pts refractory to such induction regimens. Methods: We identified pts treated with induction regimens containing HiDaC at the University of Texas – M D Anderson Cancer Center who did not achieve a compete remission (CR) after one cycle of induction. We examined their pre-treatment characteristics and compared them with similar pts achieving a CR. We also examined their response to salvage chemotherapy and outcome. Results: Among 1179 pts treated with HiDaC-based induction therapy from 1995 to 2009, 285 were primary refractory to one course of induction. Their median age was 59 (range, 18 - 85). Median pretreatment WBC was 9.0 × 109/L (range, 0.3 – 394 × 109/L). Cytogenetics included-5/-7/complex 101 (35%), diploid 85 (30%), other intermediate 98 (34%), favorable 1 (<1%). 165 (58%) pts had antecedent hematological disorder. Induction regimens used included HiDaC with anthracyclines (n=181, 64%), HiDaC with non-anthracycline chemotherapy (fludarabine, clofarabine, topotecan, and troxacitabine) (n=104, 36%) Pts with primary refractory disease were older (Median age 59 vs. 56; p=000004), more likely to have chromosome 5/7 or complex cytogenetic abnormalities (P=0.0001), more likely to have AHD (p=0.0001), and had a higher presentation WBC (P=0.036), but not a higher incidence of FLT3 mutations (p=0.85) than those achieving CR. Primary refractory disease was not more likely with non-anthracycline containing regimens than those with anthracyclines (p=0.58). Salvage chemotherapy included combination chemotherapy in 111 (39%)(non-ara-C regimen in 40, containing ara-C in 71), single agent chemotherapy in 64 (22%), allogeneic stem cell transplant in 22 (8%) and none in 88 (31%). Forty-three (15%) pts responded to salvage including 35 CR and 8 CRp. 114 (58%) pts were resistant and 35 (18%) died; 5 (3%) were lost to follow-up. With a median follow-up of 115 weeks (range 8 – 347 weeks) in pts responding to salvage, 21 pts (7%) were alive and in CR, for at least 6 months including 14 who underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplant (median overall survival for these 21 pts, 30 months; range, 13 to 87 months). Conclusions: Outcome of pts with disease refractory to HiDaC-based induction is poor. Alternative strategies are needed in these pts who are likely to be resistant to standard chemotherapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Outcomes and Treatments of Relapsed AL Amyloidosis Following Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1858-1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahma Warsame ◽  
Soo-Mee Bang ◽  
Shaji K. Kumar ◽  
Martha Q Lacy ◽  
Francis K Buadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Abstract 1858 Systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) is a condition where clonal plasma cells produce misfolded insoluble immunoglobulin light chains that deposit in various organs causing progressive organ dysfunction. Chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) when eligible is the standard treatment options for patients with AL amyloidosis. There are several studies who report long term outcomes of patient post ASCT. However, there is a paucity of literature describing the outcomes of patients who have received ASCT but have relapsed. We performed a retrospective study to assess the outcomes and treatment regimens employed following relapse after ASCT. Between 1996 and 2009, 410 patients received ASCT at the Mayo Clinic as first line therapy. Of those 410 patients 42 patients died within 3 months of transplant, 64 patients died without documented relapse, 158 patients were alive without documented progression, and 146 patients had documented progression. Those 146 patients are the subject of our study. The median time to hematologic relapse was 2 years (range: 0.2–15.5 years). At relapse, 59 patients were treated with IMiD based therapy, 36 with alkylator based therapy, 24 with bortezomib, 15 with steroids, and 5 with second ASCT. The respective hematologic response rates were 58%, 33%, 50%, 53%, and 60%. The remaining six patients were not evaluable for response for one other following reasons: organ transplants; no further therapy; inevaluable disease. With a median post relapse follow up of 3.6 years, the median overall survival (OS) from the first post ASCT relapse was 4.6 years. The median post transplant follow up was 6.1 years, the median OS for these patients was 7.3 years from the time of transplant. These data provide novel information about outcomes after SCT relapse, which should be useful not only for patients and doctors but also for investigators designing studies for salvage therapies post-transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Treatment of AL Amyloidosis with Tandem Cycles of High Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Final Analysis of a Prospective Trial.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 612-612
Author(s):  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Daniel G. Wright ◽  
Karen Quillen ◽  
Laura M. Dember ◽  
John L. Berk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Plasma Cell Dyscrasia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant

Abstract AL amyloidosis is caused by a clonal plasma cell dyscrasia and is characterized by widespread, progressive amyloid deposition leading to multisystem organ failure and death. In this disease, amyloid protein deposits are derived from monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains. Aggressive treatment of AL amyloidosis with high dose intravenous melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) is effective in inducing hematologic remission and clinical improvement. Furthermore, we have observed in over 300 patients treated with HDM/SCT that achievement of a hematologic complete response (CR), i.e. disappearance of monoclonal gammopathy and clonal plasma cell dyscrasia, is a critical determinant of clinical improvement and prolonged survival. Because of the importance of hematologic CR in treatment outcome, we conducted a prospective trial to determine whether a second cycle of HDM/SCT would induce a hematologic CR in patients in whom the plasma cell dyscrasia persisted following initial treatment with HDM/SCT. Additional objectives of the trial were to determine the feasibility and tolerability of tandem cycles of HDM/SCT in AL amyloidosis. Eligibility for entry into the trial required evidence of plasma cell dyscrasia, age &lt; 65 years, ≤ 300 mg of prior oral melphalan, and minimal measures of performance status (SWOG ≤ 2) and cardiopulmonary function (LVEF &gt; 45%, DLCO &gt; 50%). Peripheral blood stem cells were collected by leukapheresis following G-CSF mobilization, with minimum yields of 7.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg required for participation in the trial. From 11/2000 to 6/2005, 62 patients, median age 55.5 (range 32–65), M: F ratio 1.8:1.0, were enrolled. Of the 62 patients enrolled, 9 (15%) were removed from the protocol either because of an inadequate stem cell collection (7) or because of complications during stem cell mobilization and collection that precluded treatment with HDM/SCT (2). Of the 53 patients who received the first cycle of 200 mg/m2 HDM, 4 patients died within 100 days of treatment (8%), and 27 (55%) were found to have achieved a hematologic CR 6 months after HDM/SCT. Of the 22 patients who did not achieve a CR after initial treatment, 17 patients received a second HDM/SCT with 140 mg/m2 of IV melphalan. Mortality within 100 days after this second treatment was 6% (1/17), while 27 % (4/15) of surviving patients achieved a hematologic CR by 6 months following the second cycle of HDM/SCT. Therefore, for the patients treated with one or two cycles of HDM/SCT on this study, the ultimate hematologic CR rate was 63% (31/49). With a median follow up of 38 months (range, 14–69 months), the median survival for all patients enrolled has not yet been reached. Moreover, improvements in amyloid related organ dysfunction, particularly in nephrotic syndrome, liver involvement, neuropathy and/or performance status, were evident in all patients who achieved a hematologic CR. In conclusion, tandem cycles of HDM/SCT are tolerable for selected patients with AL amyloidosis and can increase the proportion of patients who ultimately achieve a hematologic CR.

Bortezomib and High Dose Melphalan Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (BortHDM/SCT) for the Treatment of AL Amyloidosis: Results of a Feasibility Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4353-4353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Lisa Yanarella ◽  
Karen Quillen ◽  
John Mark Sloan ◽  
Nancy T. Andrea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Free Light Chain ◽  
Plasma Cell Dyscrasia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Serum Free ◽  
Serum Free Light Chain

Abstract Abstract 4353 AL amyloidosis is caused by a clonal plasma cell dyscrasia and is characterized by widespread, progressive amyloid deposition leading to multisystem organ failure and death. In this disease, amyloid protein deposits are derived from monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains. Aggressive treatment of AL amyloidosis with high dose intravenous melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) is effective in inducing hematologic remission and clinical improvement. Furthermore, we have observed in ∼ 500 patients treated with HDM/SCT that achievement of a hematologic complete response (CR), i.e. disappearance of monoclonal gammopathy, normalization of serum free light chain ratio and clonal plasma cell dyscrasia, is a critical determinant of clinical improvement and prolonged survival. Bortezomib (Bor) has been reported to have activity in patients with AL amyloidosis. Furthermore, a synergistic effect between bortezomib and melphalan has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. Thus, the combination of bortezomib and HDM is a logical approach to study. Because of the importance of hematologic CR in treatment outcome, we conducted a feasibility study to determine whether addition of bort to HDM/SCT would be tolerable and would increase hematologic CR rates. Additional objectives of the study were to determine overall survival. Eligibility for entry into the trial required diagnosis of AL amyloidosis, age > 18 years, and adequate performance status (SWOG ≤ 2) and cardiopulmonary function (LVEF > 45%, DLCO > 50%). Peripheral blood stem cells were collected by leukapheresis following G-CSF mobilization, with minimum yields of 2.5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg required for participation in the trial. Bortezomib was administered at 1 mg/m2 on D -6, D -3, D +1, and D +4 and HDM at 140-200 mg/ m2 in two divided doses on D -2 and D -1. From 10/2008 to 7/2009, 8 patients were enrolled (median age 57, range 46-68; median number of involved organs 2, range 1-4). Of the 8 patients enrolled, 1 patient was removed from the protocol because of cardiac arrhythmia during stem cell mobilization and collection phase that precluded treatment with HDM/SCT. Of the 7 patients who received BorHDM/SCT, there was no treatment-related mortality within 100 days of SCT and there were no unexpected hematologic or non-hematologic toxicities associated with addition of bortezomib to HDM/SCT. The median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was D +10 and D +14 after SCT, respectively. Of 6 patients evaluable for early responses, normalization of serum free light chain levels and ratio occurred in 5 of 6 (83%) by D +14 and one patient achieved a 45% reduction in serum free light chain concentration at D +14. Of the initial 2 patients with longer follow-up, both have achieved a hematologic CR at 6 months following BorHDM/SCT. Follow-up is ongoing and hematologic responses appear to be well-maintained. Thus, this pilot study demonstrates that bortHDM/SCT is tolerable for selected patients with AL amyloidosis and leads to a high rate of hematologic responses. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Bortezomib in the treatment of AL amyloidosis.

scholarly journals Effect of Severe Hypoalbuminemia on Myelosuppression and Other Toxicities of High Dose Melphalan and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in AL Amyloidosis Patients

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5906-5906
Author(s):  
Robert Meehan ◽  
David Seldin ◽  
John Mark Sloan ◽  
Karen Quillen ◽  
Dina Brauneis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Albumin Level ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells

Abstract Background: Treatment of AL amyloidosis with high dose intravenous melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) is effective in inducing hematologic and clinical remissions associated with prolonged survival. The major toxicities are myelosuppression and GI side effects. Studies have shown that ~75% of melphalan in the blood is bound to plasma proteins, with ~25% free. We hypothesized that AL patients with severe nephrotic syndrome and profound hypoalbuminemia might have a higher fraction of free melphalan, a higher effective dose, and greater toxicity of treatment. Methods: Patients with AL amyloidosis and severe hypoalbuminemia, defined as serum albumin level of < 2 g/dL, treated from 2011 to 2013, were studied retrospectively. The stem cell transplant database was queried for dose of HDM, treatment-related complications, and days of neutrophil and platelet engraftment after SCT. Results: Of 71 patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent HDM/SCT between Jan 2011 and Dec 2013, 12 patients had severe hypoalbuminemia. Of these, 5 received full HDM at 200 mg/m2 and 7 received modified HDM at 140 mg/m2. All patients received GCSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells following HDM, with a median stem cell dose of CD34+ cells 8.1 x 106/kg (range, 4.0 to 12.2). The median time to engraftment of neutrophils was 11 days, and not statistically different based upon melphalan dose. The median time to platelet engraftment was 13 days, and also did not differ significantly by dose. These times were similar to controls without severe hypoalbuminemia. Grade 4 toxicities were observed in 2 of 7 patients with modified HDM/SCT and 1 of 5 patients with full HDM/SCT. Conclusions: These data suggest that patients with severe hypoalbuminemia do not have more prolonged myelosuppression or increased non-hematologic toxicities compared to other patients. In this retrospective study, we did not measure free melphalan concentrations in the blood. However, these data suggest that patients with severe hypoalbuminemia do not require adjustment of melphalan dosing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Feasibility of Second Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) Collection Followed by a Second Cycle of High Dose Melphalan (HDM) in Patients Relapsing after an Initial Course of HDM for the Treatment of AL Amyloidosis.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5226-5226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Quillen ◽  
Daniel G. Wright ◽  
David C. Seldin ◽  
Martha Skinner ◽  
Karim Malek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Plasma Cell Dyscrasia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
High Dose Melphalan ◽  
Initial Cycle

Abstract High-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) can induce complete hematologic responses (CR), defined as disappearance of the underlying monoclonal gammopathy from serum and urine by immunofixation electrophoresis, and of the clonal plasma cell dyscrasia by bone marrow immunohistochemistry, and extend survival in patients with AL amyloidosis. HDM/SCT results in a CR in 40% of patients, and leads to clinical improvements in organ function in >70% of those who achieve a CR. However, hematologic and clinical relapses occur in ~5% of patients who initially achieve a CR. Tandem cycles of HDM/SCT, for which sufficient PBSC collected during the initial cycle are saved for the second cycle of treatment, have been shown to achieve a higher ultimate CR rate of >60%. Among patients who do not achieve a CR following a single cycle of HDM/SCT, 30% nonetheless experience improvements in organ function. However, in this latter group, clinical improvements are not durable. Because there is limited experience with second PBSC collections in patients who have undergone prior myeloablative chemotherapy and because of the potential benefits of repeated cycles of HDM/SCT, we designed a study to explore the feasibility, and efficacy, of a second PBSC mobilization and collection followed by a second cycle of HDM/SCT in patients who relapse after initially responding to a first cycle of HDM/SCT. Results: Five patients, median age 52 (range 43–59), M:F 1.5:1.0, who had achieved hematologic and clinical responses after an initial cycle of HDM/SCT, were treated with a second cycle of HDM/SCT when a hematologic and/or clinical relapse occurred after a median time interval of 39 mo.(range 16–63 mo.). After G-CSF mobilization a mean of 5.2 million CD34 cells/kg was collected in a median of 3 days (range 2–4 days). The yields were not significantly different from those of the first cycle of HDM/SCT. Engraftment occurred at a median of 10 days for neutrophils, and 13 days for platelets (two days without platelet transfusion support); this engraftment timing is similar to that following initial transplants (11 and 12 days respectively). There was no treatment-related mortality, but toxicity was moderate; all patients experienced grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicities. For the 3 patients evaluable at 1 year, no hematologic CR was observed; these patients expired at 38, 37 and 15 mo. Two patients are alive at 5 and 11 mo. post transplant. Conclusion: Patients with AL amyloidosis who experience a hematologic or clinical relapse after responding to an initial course of HDM/SCT can successfully be re-mobilized, and undergo a second cycle of HDM/SCT, with prompt hematopoietic recovery. Clinical benefits of second cycles of HDM/SCT in this setting have yet to be determined. Patient data prior Rx CD34 yield #1/#2 (10E6 cells/kg) HDM #1/#2 (melphalan dose mg/m2) Days to WBC eng #1/#2 Days to PLT eng #1/#2 CR#1/CR#2 Survival (mo.) #1/#2 refer to first/second transplant 1 none 8.0/4.1 200/200 9/11 9/12 yes/no 38 2 M/P x2 8.8/7.7 200/200 11/10 12/34 no/no 37 3 VAD x3 7.9/4.6 200/140 11/10 17/13 no/no 15 4 M/P x2 5.9/6.2 200/200 9/9 12/24 no/? alive at 11 mo. 5 none 4.3/3.4 200/140 11/10 11/11 no/? alive at 5 mo.

scholarly journals Similar Survival with Deferred Versus Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Light Chain Amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4579-4579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny Luan ◽  
Koen Van Besien ◽  
Paul J Christos ◽  
Roger Pearse ◽  
Danielle Guarneri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Renal Amyloidosis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant

Background: Light chain (AL) amyloidosis is characterized by deposition of misfolded monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains leading to organ dysfunction. AL amyloidosis has traditionally been treated with agents used in multiple myeloma, primarily alkylators, proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), and high-dose melphalan/autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). A retrospective study comparing patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent ASCT as frontline therapy ('upfront ASCT') to those undergoing ASCT following induction ('deferred ASCT') revealed that deferred ASCT was associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) compared to upfront ASCT (Afrough et al, Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2018). Given the number of effective new therapies for AL amyloidosis, the potential to delay ASCT after one or more lines of therapy ('salvage ASCT') is feasible. To our knowledge, transplant outcomes of AL amyloidosis patients undergoing deferred vs salvage ASCT following at least one relapse have not been reported. A retrospective chart review was conducted to compare AL amyloidosis patients receiving deferred vs salvage ASCT for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Weill Cornell Medical College. Methods: Twenty-four patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent deferred or salvage ASCT between 2000-2018 were included in the analysis. Patients who underwent upfront ASCT without induction chemotherapy were excluded. Demographics and clinical parameters were extracted from the electronic medical record. PFS was calculated from date of ASCT to first relapse and OS was calculated both from date of diagnosis and date of ASCT to death. Patients were censored if lost to follow-up prior to experiencing the relevant event. PFS as well as OS of patients who underwent deferred vs salvage ASCT were compared. Log-rank tests were used to statistically evaluate differences between Kaplan-Meier PFS/OS curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) using deferred ASCT as the reference treatment. Results: Among the 24 patients included in this analysis, 13 underwent deferred ASCT with 1 prior line of chemotherapy (e.g., induction), and 11 underwent salvage ASCT with a median of 3 prior lines (Table 1). Ten patients had cardiac amyloidosis, 15 had renal amyloidosis, and 6 had multi-organ involvement. Induction regimens received in the deferred group are included in Table 1. Neither PFS nor OS was significantly different between patients receiving deferred vs salvage ASCT. After median follow-up of 2.9 years, median PFS in patients who received deferred ASCT was 6.5 years and not reached in those who received salvage ASCT (P=0.47), with a HR of 1.74 (95% CI, 0.38-7.85) (Figure 1A). Median OS from date of ASCT was not reached in either group after a median follow-up of 2.8 years (P=0.52), with a HR of 2.16 (95% CI, 0.19-24.04) (Figure 1B). Similarly, median OS calculated from date of diagnosis was not significantly different between deferred vs salvage ASCT (P=0.79) (Figure 1C). Conclusions: In this cohort of 24 AL amyloidosis patients, no significant differences in PFS or OS were seen between patients undergoing deferred ASCT following induction vs salvage ASCT following multiple lines of therapy. Unlike the superior OS seen with deferred vs upfront ASCT, our findings show that either deferred or salvage ASCT may be associated with comparable outcomes and suggest similar OS despite timing of transplant. However, it is important to note the small sample size and that none of our patients received daratumumab-based regimens which may have improved PFS/OS in either or both groups. There were also small differences between groups in use of maintenance (1 vs 3 patients in the deferred and salvage groups, respectively) and proportion of patients receiving higher doses of melphalan 200mg/m2 vs 140 mg/m2 (69% vs 55% in deferred and salvage groups, respectively). Nevertheless, the lack of difference seen in PFS and OS between the two groups suggests that eventual hematologic relapse and organ progression with death occur at similar time intervals despite timing of ASCT. This speaks to the point that in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis as well as later in the disease, achieving deep responses to prevent organ progression and death regardless of timing of ASCT remains an important treatment goal. Disclosures Van Besien: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Coleman:Kite Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding; Gilead, Bayer, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Takeda, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosenbaum:Janssen: Research Funding; Honoraria Akcea: Other: Accordant Health.

High Dose Melphalan with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Overcomes Poor Prognosis of Primary Amyloidosis

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1350-1350
Author(s):  
Simrit Parmar ◽  
Mubeen Khan ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
Nina Shah ◽  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Bone Marrow Plasma ◽  
Organ Response ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Abstract 1350 Background: Systemic Primary AL Amyloidosis is a rare but potentially fatal disease resulting from tissue deposits of amyloid fibrils derived from monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains. High-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto HCT) is associated with hematologic and organ responses and improved survival. Methods: In this retrospective analysis we identified 46 patients with primary AL amyloidosis who received auto HCT between 01/1998 to 05/2010 at MDACC. Organ responses were determined using Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria. Results: The median age at auto HSCT was 56 years (34-74) where 61% were males and 35% were older than 60 years of age. 61% had lambda light chain restriction and only 4% had cytogenetic abnormalities. Disease characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median time from diagnosis to auto HCT was 6.6 months (2.2-29.4 months). 22 pts (47.8%) had one organ, 19 pts (41.3%) had 2 organ and 4 pts (8.7%) had 3 organ involvement. 11 pts (23.9%) had heart and 35 pts (76.1%) had kidney involvement. The median follow up from the time of diagnosis was 22.4 months and from time of auto HCT was 16.7 months. High dose Melphalan dose was 200mg/m2 in 24 pts (52%) and 140mg/m2 in 22 (47.8%). There were 4 early deaths and 4 pts whose follow up was less than 3 months and their response was not assessed. Out of the 38 evaluable patients, the post-transplant organ responses were as follows ≥PR 25(66%), ≥stable disease 35(92%) (Table2). The hematologic responses were: CR=5 (13%), ≥VGPR=10(26%), ≥PR=26 (68%), ≥SD=37(97%). One patient had progressive disease. There was a correlation between organ response and hematologic response (chi square;p<10-3). The day-100 treatment related mortality (TRM) was 8.7% and 1-yr TRM was 13%. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from auto HCT was 73.8 months and not reached (from transplant). The median PFS and OS from diagnosis were 93 months and 59.8 months respectively. In multivariate analysis, heart involvement (p=0.01), female sex (p=0.011), age ≥60 years (p=0.002), bone marrow plasma cells≥10% (p=0.043) and Beta-2 microglobulin>3.5mg/l (p=0.02) were associated with poor OS. Improved OS correlated with organ response (52.6 vs 11.4 months; p=0.01) and hematologic response (52.6 vs.6.1months; p=0.002). Hemoglobin <10 g/dl (p=0.047), bone marrow plasma cells≥10% (p=0.043) and age≥60 years (p=0.075) were associated with shorter PFS. Hematologc response (p=0.48) and organ response (p=0.12) were not associated with improved PFS. Conclusion: In this analysis the outcome of patients with primary systemic AL amyloidosis was durable with auto HCT with acceptable mortality risk and improved survival. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document