Clinical Impact and Resource Utilization After Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2142-2142
Author(s):  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Robert Wolf ◽  
Ivana N. Micallef ◽  
Dennis A. Gastineau
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Hodgkin Disease ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 2142 Poster Board II-119 High-dose chemotherapy in conjunction with autologous SCT is the preferred treatment of relapsed Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Failure to achieve optimal stem cell mobilization results in multiple subsequent attempts, which consumes large amounts of growth factors and potentially requires antibiotics and transfusions. We retrospectively reviewed the natural history of stem cell mobilization attempts at our institution from 2001 through 2007 to determine the frequency of suboptimal mobilization in patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing autologous transplant and analyzed the subsequent resource utilization in patients with initially failed attempts. Of 1,775 patients undergoing mobilization during the study period, stem cell collection (defined by the number of CD34+ cells/kg) was “ optimal” (≥5×106) in 53%, “low” (≥2 to 5×106) in 25%,“ poor” (<2×106) in 10%, and “failed” (<10 CD34+ cells/mL) in 12%. In the 47% of collections that were less than optimal, increased resource consumption included increased use of growth factors and antibiotics, subsequent chemotherapy mobilization, increased transfusional support, more apheresis procedures, and more frequent hospitalization. Other costs often omitted include the need for hospitalization, which was seen in 5% to 11% of the patients in our study. Parenteral antibiotics were needed when fever developed in 7% of patients with Hodgkin disease, 4% with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 24% with multiple myeloma who underwent mobilization using a chemotherapy pulse. When stem cell mobilization was not immediately optimal, subsequent attempts to mobilize failed completely in 3 of 42 patients (7%) with Hodgkin disease (3% of the original Hodgkin disease cohort), 56 of 157 (36%) with multiple myeloma (6% of the original myeloma cohort), and 50 of 328 (15%) with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (7% of the original non-Hodgkin lymphoma cohort). These usually unappreciated costs of stem cell mobilization failure highlight the need for more effective mobilization strategies. Disclosures: Gertz: genzyme: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Plerixafor for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients Previously Treated with Fludarabine or Lenalidomide

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1932-1932
Author(s):  
Florent Malard ◽  
Nicolaus Kröger ◽  
Ian H Gabriel ◽  
Kai Hübel ◽  
Jane F. Apperley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Autologous Hsct

Abstract Abstract 1932 High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective treatment for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM). At present, G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are the preferred stem cell source for autologous HSCT. Fludarabine and lenalidomide are essential drugs in the front line treatment of NHL and MM respectively. Data suggests that fludarabine and lenalidomide therapy may have a deleterious effect on stem cell mobilization. Prior to the drug approval in Europe, a plerixafor compassionate use program (CUP) was available from July 2008 to August 2010 to provide access to the drug for patients with MM or lymphoma who had previously failed a mobilization attempt, and who were not eligible for another specific plerixafor trial. In the European CUP, 48 patients (median age 57 years; range, 36–69), previously treated with fludarabine (median 5 cycles; range, 1–7 cycles) were given plerixafor plus G-CSF for remobilization following a primary mobilisation attempt. All 48 patients had a diagnosis of NHL. The overall median number of CD34+ cells collected was 2.3×106 /Kg (range, 0.3–13.4). The minimum required number of CD34+ cells (≥2.0×106 per kg) was collected from 58% of patients, while only 3 patients (6%) collected ≥5.0×106 CD34+ cells. The collection target of 2.0×106/Kg was reached in a median of 2 apheresis sessions (range, 1–3). Thirty-five patients (median age 57 years; range, 34–66), previously treated with lenalidomide (median 5 cycles; range, 1–10 cycles) were given plerixafor plus G-CSF for remobilization. All patients the 35 patients had MM. The overall median number of CD34+ cells collected was 3.4×106/Kg (range, 1.1–14.8). The minimum required number of CD34+ cells (≥2.0×106 per kg) was collected from 69% of patients, including 12 patients (34%) who were able to collect ≥5.0×106 cells/Kg. In the Len group, 7 patients (20%) had received a prior autologous HSCT before salvage mobilization with plerixafor. Both targets were reached with a median of 2 apheresis sessions (range, 1–4). In conclusion, salvage mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF is successful in the majority of patients with MM previously treated with lenalidomide. In fludarabine-exposed patients, only 58% of patients will achieve successful salvage mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF, suggesting the need for large prospective studies evaluating the efficacy of plerixafor for frontline mobilization in this subgroup of patients.Table 1.Study population characteristicsCharacteristic (%)Fludarabine (N=48)Lenalidomide (N=35)Patient age, median (range)57 (36–69)57 (34–66)Patient gender    Male26 (54)18 (51)    Female22 (46)17 (42)Fludarabine or Lenalidomide cycles, median (range)5 (1–7)5 (1–10)Diagnosis and disease statusIndolent NHL48 (100)0 (0)Multiple myeloma0 (0)35 (100)Previous chemotherapy: number of lines, median (range)3 (1–6)4 (1–9)Previous autograft    Yes07 (20)    No43 (90)20 (57)    Data missing5 (10)8 (23)Radiotherapy    Yes5 (10)3 (9)    No36 (75)24 (68)    Data missing7 (15)8 (23)Mobilization strategy with plerixafor    Steady-state GCSF mobilization38 (79)27 (77)    Chemotherapy+GCSF mobilization10 (21)8 (23)No. of patients collected44 (92)34 (97)CD34+ cells collected per Kg, median (range)2.3 (0.3–13.4)3.4 (1.1–14.8)No. of patients who reached ≥ 2.106 CD34+28 (58)24 (69)No. of apheresis days to reach ≥ 2.106 CD34+2 (1–3)2 (1–4)No. of patients who reached ≥ 5.106 CD34+3 (6)12 (34)No. of apheresis days to reach ≥ 5.106 CD34+2 (1–3)2 (1–3)NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma Disclosures: Mohty: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Afternoon Plerixafor Administration for Stem Cell Mobilization

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1179545X1879225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia El Rahi ◽  
James Eldin Cox ◽  
Romelia May ◽  
George Carrum ◽  
Gloria Obi Anyadike ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Collection Efficiency ◽  
Practice Change ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Administration Time ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Background: When used for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization, plerixafor was originally recommended to be administered 11 hours prior to apheresis based on the peak effect of 10 to 14 hours translating into an administration time of 10 to 11 pm. Reports of post-plerixafor anaphylactic reactions mandated labeling change by the Food and Drug Administration with recommendation of monitoring patients after administration. Based on data suggesting sustained plerixafor activity at 18 hours, we changed our administration time to 4 pm at our center. Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the stem cell collection efficiency before and after the practice change at our institution. Methods: A retrospective chart review for patients with multiple myeloma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma who received a plerixafor-containing mobilization regimen was conducted. The primary end point was the percentage of patients achieving the minimal CD34+ cell goal in ⩽2 apheresis days. The secondary end points included the percentage of patients achieving the preferred CD34+ cell goal in ⩽2 apheresis days, days of apheresis, total CD34+ cells Collected, and engraftment time. Results: A total of 208 patients (4 pm group n = 68, 10 pm group n = 140) with multiple myeloma (n = 112), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 86) were included in the analysis. About 91% and 89% ( P = .804) of the patients in the 4 and 10 pm groups, respectively, collected minimum cell dose. Preferred CD34+ cell goal was achieved in 57% and 53% of patients in the 4 and 10 pm groups, respectively. Conclusions: Late afternoon administration of plerixafor provides efficient stem cell mobilization.

High Number of Successful Mobilizations Associated with the Use of Plerixafor and Colony Stimulating Factors In Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Lymphoma Treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2263-2263
Author(s):  
Nelly G. Adel ◽  
Mathew Sherry ◽  
Stephen J. Harnicar ◽  
Emily Mccullagh ◽  
Heather Landau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Published Data ◽  
First Line ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factors ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 2263 Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the only curative option for many lymphoma patients and it is an integral component of treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Stem cell mobilization has most commonly been performed using either chemotherapy and colony-stimulating factors or colony stimulating factors alone. This approach was challenged by the inability to collect enough CD 34 cell count to perform an ASCT. Plerixafor (Mozobil ®) previously known as AMD3100, a selective antagonist of CXCR4, has recently been approved for ASCT mobilization in combination with granulocyte- colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for both multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients and is effective for patients who failed to mobilize enough CD34 cells with other modalities. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study examines all adult patients with MM and lymphoma who received plerixafor as a mobilization agent for ASCT at Memorial Sloan- Kettering Cancer Center between January 1st, 2009 and August 1st, 2010. Patient's information was obtained from the pharmacy data base and electronic medical records. Data included demographics, diagnosis, first line mobilization regimen, second and third line regimens, doses of plerixafor received, number of pheresis sessions and CD34 cells per kg collected per each session. The primary objective was to determine how many patients failed stem cell collection following mobilization at our center. Results: Fifty-six adult patients with lymphoma (N=23) and MM (N=33) were identified. Patients were excluded if they were treated for a pediatric malignancy or an alternate diagnosis. The average number of pheresis and CD34 cells/kg collected in each group are shown Table 1. Forty-three percent (10/23) patients with lymphoma received plerixafor and G-CSF as the first line option for mobilization and 57% (13/23) received plerixafor and G-CSF after failing other regimens. A total of 5 (22%) patients with lymphoma failed collection following mobilization with plerixafor, 1 as a primary mobilization failure and 4 having failed other mobilization strategies. Thirty-nine percent (13/33) of patients with MM received plerixafor and G-CSF as the first line option for mobilization and 61% (20/33)after failing other regimens, including cyclophosphamide (N=15) and G-CSF alone (N=5). Among the patients mobilized with plerixafor, 6% (2/33) failed collection, 1 who received plerixafor and G-CSF for primary mobilization and only 1 after failing other regimens. Conclusion: In lymphoma and MM patients plerixafor in combination with G-CSF is effective for stem cell mobilization and in this study we report higher success rates than in previously published data. The few number of failures with plerixafor plus G-CSF given as a primary mobilization regimen, supports its use in this setting and is attractive considering that it can reduce patient's exposure to chemotherapy. Disclosures: Matasar: Genzyme Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals G-CSF Plus Preemptive Plerixafor Versus Cyclophosphamide Plus G-CSF for Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Effectiveness, Safety and Cost Analysis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5823-5823
Author(s):  
Ahmad Antar ◽  
Zaher Otrock ◽  
Mohamed Kharfan-Dabaja ◽  
Hussein Abou Ghaddara ◽  
Nabila Kreidieh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Yield ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Introduction: The optimal stem cell mobilization regimen for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains undefined. Most transplant centers use either a chemo-mobilization strategy using cyclophosphamide (CY) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or a steady state strategy using G-CSF alone or with plerixafor in case of mobilization failure. However, very few studies compared efficacy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide (CY) and G-CSF versus G-CSF with preemptive plerixafor. In this study, we retrospectively compared our single center experience at the American University of Beirut in 89 MM patients using fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF as our past preferred chemo-mobilization strategy in MM patients with our new mobilization strategy using G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor. The change in practice was implemented when plerixafor became available, in order to avoid CY associated toxicity. Patients and methods: Patients in the CY group (n=62) (Table 1) received either fractionated high-dose CY (n=56) (5g/m2 divided in 5 doses of 1g/m2 every 3 hours) or CY at 50mg/kg/day for 2 doses (n=6). G-CSF was started on day +6 of chemotherapy at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours. All patients in the plerixafor group (n=27) (Table 1) received G-CSF at a fixed dose of 300 µg subcutaneously every 12 hours daily for 4 days. On day 5, if peripheral blood CD34+ was ≥ 20/µl, apheresis was started immediately. Plerixafor (240 µg/kg) was given 7-11 hours before the first apheresis if CD34+ cell count on peripheral blood on day 5 was <20/µl and before the second apheresis if CD34+ cells on the first collect were <3х106/kg. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range: 1-3) in both groups. Results: Compared with plerixafor, CY use was associated with higher median peak peripheral blood CD34+ counts (35 vs 111 cells/µl, P= 0.000003), and total CD34+ cell yield (7.5 х 106 vs 15.9 х 106 cells/kg, P= 0.003). All patients in both groups collected ≥4x106 CD34+ cells/Kg. Moreover, 60 (96.7%) and 46 (74.2%) patients in the CY group vs 24 (88.8%) and 6 (22%) patients in the plerixafor group collected >6х106 and >10x106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively (P=0.16; P<0.00001). Only 4 (6.4%) patients required two apheresis sessions in the CY group compared to 11 (40%) in the plerixafor group (P=0.0001). Conversely, CY use was associated with higher frequency of febrile neutropenia (60% vs 0%; P<0.00001), blood transfusions (27% vs 0%; P<0.00001), platelets transfusion (25% vs 0%; P<0.00001) and hospitalizations (64% vs 0%; P<0.00001). No one required intensive level of care and all recovered. Autografting was successfully performed in all patients using high-dose melphalan with a median time from mobilization to the first transplant of 31 days (range: 16-156) in the CY group compared to 13 days (range: 8-40) in the plerixafor group (P=0.027); and median infused CD34+ cells were 7х106/kg (range: 3.1-15.3) versus 5.27 (2.6-7.45), respectively (P=0.002). The average total cost of mobilization using the adjusted costs based on National Social Security Fund (NSSF) prices in Lebanon in the plerixafor group was slightly higher compared with the CY group ($7964 vs $7536; P=0.16). Conclusions: Our data indicate robust stem cell mobilization in MM patients with either fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF or G-CSF alone with preemptive plerixafor. The chemo-mobilization approach was associated with two-fold stem cell yield, slightly lower cost (including cost of hospitalization) but significantly increased toxicity. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Bortezomib Given in Sequence with Anthracycline and Thalidomide-Containing Regimens Does Not Adversely Affect Stem Cell Mobilization and Engraftment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 541-541
Author(s):  
Geoffrey L. Uy ◽  
Nicholas M. Fisher ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
Hanna J. Khoury ◽  
Douglas R. Adkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Bortezomib (VELCADE®) is a selective inhibitor of the 26S proteasome proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). While high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) remains the standard of care, there is considerable interest in incorporating bortezomib into the initial treatment of MM. However, the role of bortezomib in frontline therapy for MM will depend in part on its effects on subsequent stem cell mobilization and engraftment. We conducted a pilot study of bortezomib administered pretransplant followed by high-dose melphalan with AHSCT. Two cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 were administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21-day treatment cycle. One week after the last dose of bortezomib, stem cell mobilization was initiated by administering filgrastim 10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously on consecutive days until stem cell harvest was completed. Stem cell collection began on day 5 of filgrastim via large volume apheresis (20 L/day) performed daily until a minimum of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected. Patients were subsequently admitted to the hospital for high-dose melphalan 100 mg/m2/day x 2 days followed by reinfusion of peripheral blood stem cells 48 hours later. Sargramostim 250 mcg/m2/day subcutaneously was administered starting day +1 post-transplant and continued until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm3 for 2 consecutive days. To date, 23 of a planned 40 patients have been enrolled in this study with 19 patients having completed their initial therapy with bortezomib followed by AHSCT. Patient population consists of 16 male and 7 female patients with the median age at diagnosis of 58 years (range 38–68). Myeloma characteristics at diagnosis were as follows (number of patients): IgG (16), IgA (7) with stage II (9) or stage III (14) disease. Prior to receiving bortezomib, 11 patients were treated with VAD (vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone) or DVd (Doxil, vincristine and dexamethasone), 5 patients with thalidomide and 5 patients with both. Two patients did not receive any prior chemotherapy. All patients successfully achieved the target of 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in either one (15/19 patients) or two (4/19 patients) collections with the first apheresis product containing a mean of 5.79 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Analysis of peripheral blood by flow cytometry demonstrated no significant differences in lymphocyte subsets before and after treatment with bortezomib. Following AHSCT, all patients successfully engrafted with a median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC ≥ 500/mm3) of 11 days (range 9–14 days). Platelet engraftment (time to platelet count ≥ 20,000/mm3 sustained for 7 days without transfusion) occurred at a median of 12 days (range 9–30 days). Eleven patients were evaluable for response at 100 days post-transplant. Compared to pre-bortezomib paraprotein levels, 3 patients achieved a CR or near CR, 7 maintained a PR while 1 patient developed PD. We conclude that pretransplant treatment with 2 cycles of bortezomib does not adversely affect stem cell yield or time to engraftment in patients with MM undergoing AHSCT. Updated results and detailed analysis will be available at the time of presentation.

A Phase II, Open-Label Pilot Study to Evaluate the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization of TG-0054 Combined with G-CSF in 12 Patients with Multiple Myeloma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Hodgkin Lymphoma - an Interim Analysis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 515-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gayatri Setia ◽  
Nabil Hagog ◽  
Bita Jalilizeinali ◽  
Sharon Funkhouser ◽  
Loretta Pierzchanowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Background: TG-0054 (burixafor) is a potent and selective antagonist of human chemokine receptor CXCR4 that inhibits the binding of stromal-derived factor 1 (SDF-1). Interruption of the CXCR4/SDF-1 interaction prevents sequestration of CD34+ stem cells to the bone marrow and subsequently mobilizes these cells into the peripheral blood within 1 to 3 hours of drug administration. Materials and Methods: An open-label, phase II pilot trial was conducted in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), or Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) to evaluate the safety and stem cell mobilization of TG-0054 in combination with G-CSF. We planned to treat twelve patients with subcutaneous injections of 10 µg/kg/day G-CSF in the afternoon for 4 days. On the morning of Day 5, patients received 3.14 mg/kg TG-0054 and underwent large volume (18-24L) leukapheresis approximately 2 hours post-drug infusion. Patients were allowed by protocol to undergo leukapheresis for 1-5 days to obtain the predetermined target of ≥5.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. 9 of 12 patients have been treated thus far with a plan to treat 3 additional patients. Results: A planned interim analysis revealed that6 of the 9 patients treated thus far collected more than 10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 1 leukapheresis session. 2 patients required 2 days to achieve the study endpoint, and 1 outlier patient who had received Revlimid only 1 week prior to peripheral blood CD34 analysis failed to mobilize stem cells until he was allowed 2 more weeks to recover from his Revlimid treatment. Burixafor was well tolerated, and there were no adverse events that were attributed to the drug. All of the patients engrafted promptly after melphalan (7 patients) or BEAM (2 patients) conditioning regimens. Conclusion: Burixafor in combination with G-CSF is a potent and well-tolerated mobilizer of stem cells into the peripheral blood, and with the exception of 1 outlier, was able to mobilize >5.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg in 1-2 leukapheresis sessions in all patients treated thus far (median 1 day). This contrasts with our historical controls that required a median of 2-3 days to achieve a collection of ≥5.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg. A total of 12 patients will be treated on this pilot study. These encouraging results warrant the further testing of this drug in a larger randomized clinical trial. Disclosures Hsu: Taigen Biotechnology: Employment. Chang:Taigen Biotechnology: Employment. Schuster:Taigen Biotechnology: Research Funding.

Adequacy of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with relapsed B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with bendamustine

2015 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 1189-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Iliff ◽  
Clint Divine ◽  
Francisco Diaz ◽  
Omar Aljitawi ◽  
Sunil Abhayankar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Blood Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Mobilization
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document