Occurrence, Management, and Outcomes In Patients with Pleural Effusion During Dasatinib Treatment for Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) In the First-Line Setting: Analysis of the DASISION Trial

Abstract Abstract 2282 Background: The Phase 3 DASISION trial comparing dasatinib 100 mg once daily with imatinib 400 mg once daily as initial treatment in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP has demonstrated superior efficacy and favorable safety of dasatinib after a minimum of 12 months of follow-up (Kantarjian, H, et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2260). While fluid retention was more frequent with imatinib than with dasatinib, pleural effusion was seen only with dasatinib. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of pts experiencing pleural effusion, a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction. Methods: 519 pts with newly diagnosed, treatment-naive CML-CP (median disease duration of 1 month) were randomly assigned to either dasatinib 100 mg once daily (259 pts) or imatinib 400 mg one daily (260 pts). Key endpoints included complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and safety. All pts were assessed by chest x-ray at baseline and at 6 months after randomization, or more frequently, if indicated clinically. Pts with pleural effusion at baseline were excluded. Pleural effusion was graded according to CTCAE version 3 (grade 1, asymptomatic; grade 2, symptomatic, up to 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 3, symptomatic requiring supplemental oxygen, < 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 4, life-threatening, hemodynamic instability). Results: After a minimum follow-up of 12 months with median treatment duration of 14.3 months (range, 0.3–25.8), 26 (10%, median age, 60 years) of the 258 dasatinib-treated pts (median age, 46 years) experienced pleural effusion. Of the pts with pleural effusion, 6 (23%) had low, 17 (65%) had intermediate and 3 (12%) had high Hasford risk scores. There were no grade 3 or 4 pleural effusion events. All events were grade 1(2%) or grade 2 (8%). Most events (n = 22, 85%) occurred more than 8 weeks after the start of study drug. In pts who had a pleural effusion, the median time to the event was 28 weeks (range, 4–88). Lymphocytosis (defined as peripheral blood lymphocyte count > 3.6 × 109/L) was noted in 11 (42%) of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, as compared to 46 (20%) of 232 pts with no pleural effusion. Pleural effusion was managed by dose modification and/or medical intervention. Therapy was interrupted in 19 pts, and the dose of dasatinib was reduced in 8 pts (4 pts, to 80 mg; 1 pt, to 70 mg; 3 pts, to 50 mg). Twelve pts received diuretics, 7 received corticosteroids, and only 1 pt underwent therapeutic thoracentesis. Only 3 pts (1.2%) discontinued therapy due to pleural effusion (grade 2). Eleven pts who continued dasatinib had resolution of their pleural effusion. Five pts had recurrent effusions. Of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, 24 (92%) achieved a CCyR and 17 (65%) achieved a MMR by 12 months of treatment; the corresponding CCyR and MMR rates in the total pt population were 83% and 46%, respectively Seven of the 8 pts with pleural effusion who reduced their dose achieved CCyR and MMR. Conclusion: In pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP treated with dasatinib as initial therapy, pleural effusion was mild to moderate in severity, and was manageable with dose interruption and/reduction and/or a short course of diuretics and/or corticosteroids. The occurrence of pleural effusion and management interventions did not negatively affect the achievement of CCyR or MMR. These findings are in line with data reported previously for second-line dasatinib in CML pts resistant or intolerant to imatinib (Porkka, K, et al. Cancer 2010;116:377). Furthermore, pleural effusion and peripheral lymphocytosis may be indicative of immune-mediated antitumor activity of dasatinib. Disclosures: Porkka: BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Baccarani: Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian: BMS, Pfizer and Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Mustjoki: BMS, Novartis: Honoraria. Bradley-Garelik: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Cortes: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis and Wyeth: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Radotinib Compared with Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: 12 Months Result of Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.476.476 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 476-476 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Jae-Yong Kwak ◽

Hawk Kim ◽

Jeong A Kim ◽

Young Rok Do ◽

Hyeoung Joon Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Blast Crisis ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Radotinib is a second generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed by IL-YANG Pharm. Co., Ltd (Seoul, South Korea) and approved by the Korea FDA for the treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who have failed prior TKIs. We conducted the randomized, open-label, phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of radotinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed CML-CP. Methods Based on baseline demographics and Sokal risk score, 241 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to radotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) (n=79), radotinib 400 mg bid (n=81), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (qd) (n=81). The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months and molecular response was assessed by RQ-PCR at baseline and every 3 months. Secondary endpoints were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), MR4.5 by 12 months, and the rate of progression to accelerate phase or blast crisis. Results All three study groups were well balanced with baseline age, gender, race and Sokal risk score. With minimum follow-up of 12 months, the proportions of patients receiving a study drug were 86.3% (69/79) in radotinib 300 mg bid group, 71.6% (58/81) in radotinib 400 mg bid group, and 81.5% (66/81) in imatinib 400 mg qd group. By 12 months, rates of MMR were significantly higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid (51.9%, P = .0044) and radotinib 400 mg bid (45.7%, P = .0342) compared with imatinib (29.6%). The median time to MMR among responders were shorter on radotinib 300 mg bid (5.7 months) and radotinib 400 mg bid (5.6 months) than imatinib group (8.2 months). The MR4.5 rates by 12 months were also higher for both radotinib 300 mg bid (15.2%) and 400 mg bid (13.6%) compared to imatinib (8.6%). The CCyR rates by 12 months were also higher for radotinib 300 mg bid (91.1%, P = .0120) compared with imatinib (76.5%). There was no progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis in all groups by 12 months. Discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) or laboratory abnormalities occurred in 7 (8.8%), 16 (19.8%), and 5 (6.2%) patients for radotinib 300 mg bid, radotinib 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 16.5% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid, in 13.6% for radotinib 400 mg bid, and in 19.8% receiving imatinib. And grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 19.0%, 23.5%, and 29.6% for radotinib 300 mg bid, 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. The most common any grade non-laboratory AEs were skin rash (35.4% and 33.3%), nausea/vomiting (22.8% and 23.5%), headache (19.0% and 30.9%), and pruritus (19.0% and 30.0%) in radotinib 300 mg bid and radotinib 400 mg bid, respectively; AEs in the imatinib group were edema (34.6%), myalgia (28.4%), nausea/vomiting (27.2%), and skin rash (22.2%). Overall, grade 3/4 non-laboratory AEs were uncommon in all groups. Conclusions With minimum 12 months follow-up, radotinib demonstrated significantly higher and faster rates of CCyR and MMR than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. The safety profiles of the radotinib and imatinib were different, and most AEs were manageable with optimal dose reduction. The results of this trial support that radotinib can be one of the standard of care in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Table. Baseline Characteristics, Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Rates Radotinib 300mg BID Radotinib 400mg BID Imatinib 400mg QD (N=79) (N=81) (N=81) Age, median (range), years 45 (20-75) 43 (18-84) 45 (18-83) Gender, n (%) Male 52 (65.8) 47 (58.0) 52 (64.2) Female 27 (34.2) 34 (42.0) 29 (35.8) Sokal risk, n (%) Low 21 (26.6) 22 (27.2) 22 (27.2) Intermediate 38 (48.1) 38 (46.9) 39 (48.2) High 20 (25.3) 21 (25.9) 20 (24.7) MMR by 12 months, % 51.9 45.7 29.6 P = .0044 P = .0342 Cumulative Incidence of MMR by 12 months¢Ó, % 57.0 58.0 35.0 P = .0040 P = .0037 MR4.5 by 12 months, % 15.2 13.6 8.6 CCyR by 12 months, % 91.1 81.5 76.5 ¢Ó Kaplan-Meier estimates of MMR Disclosures Kim: IL-YANG Pharm. Co. Ltd: Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Chung:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Choi:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bosutinib As Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Failure with Imatinib Plus Dasatinib and/or Nilotinib: 24-Month Minimum Follow-up Update

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3785.3785 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3785-3785 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

H. Jean Khoury ◽

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

David Marin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pleural Effusion ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Median Time ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3785 Bosutinib (BOS) is an orally active, dual Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluated BOS in patients (pts) with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML) following TKI failure. A total of 119 pts aged ≥18 y with prior imatinib (IM) failure plus dasatinib (DAS) resistance (n = 38), DAS intolerance (n = 50), nilotinib (NIL) resistance (n = 27), NIL intolerance (n = 1), or failure of DAS and NIL (n = 3) received BOS starting at 500 mg/d. Median age was 56 y (range, 20–79 y); 45% of pts were male; median time from CML diagnosis was 6.5 y (range, 0.6–18.3 y). Median BOS duration was 8.6 mo (range, 0.2–60.8 mo); 24% of pts are still on treatment. Dose escalation to BOS 600 mg/d occurred in 19% of pts. Time from last pt's first dose to data cutoff was 25 mo (median follow-up duration of 31.4 mo [range, 0.3–66.0 mo]). A confirmed complete hematologic response (CHR) was attained/maintained by 73% of evaluable pts (Table). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) probability of maintaining a CHR at 2 y was 67%. A major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was attained/maintained by 41%, including 32% with a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). Among evaluable pts without a baseline CCyR, 36% (n = 37/102) achieved a MCyR, including 28 (28%) with a CCyR. The KM probability of maintaining a MCyR at 2 y was 71%. Of 86 pts with baseline mutation status, 40 (47%) pts had 19 unique Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations, including 7 (8%) pts with T315I. Responses were seen across mutations (75% CHR, 43% MCyR excluding T315I), including those conferring resistance to other TKIs; responses in pts with T315I were low (29% CHR; 14% MCyR). Nine of 37 pts evaluated at baseline and treatment discontinuation had ≥1 new mutation (V299L, n = 4; L248V, n = 2; T315I, n = 2; F359C, n = 1; G250E, n = 1); 8 of 9 pts had discontinued BOS due to disease progression or lack of efficacy. On-treatment transformation to accelerated phase CML occurred in 5 (4%) pts after 16 to 428 d on study; no pt transformed to blast phase CML. KM-estimated on-treatment progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 y was 75%; KM-estimated overall survival (OS) at 2 y was 84% (Table). There were 23 (19%) deaths on study, with 6 deaths occurring ≤30 d after the last BOS dose. Most deaths were due to disease progression (n = 10 [8%]) or an adverse event (AE; n = 10 [8%]; including 1 treatment-related death due to gastrointestinal bleeding). Three deaths were due to unknown cause ≥509 d after the last BOS dose. Non-hematologic treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) seen in ≥20% of pts (all grades; grade 3/4) included diarrhea (82%; 8%), nausea (49%; 1%), vomiting (40%; 1%), rash (27%; 3%), headache (26%; 3%), fatigue (24%; 1%), and abdominal pain (20%; 1%). The incidence of individual TEAEs was generally similar across groups regardless of prior TKI exposure. Diarrhea TEAEs were predominantly grade 1/2, first reported early during treatment (median time to first event of 1.5 d [range, 1–210 d]), and transient (median event duration of 2 d [range, 1–524 d]). The incidence of pleural effusion was highest among DAS-intolerant pts (n = 11 [22%], including 3 pts with grade 3 events); for 9 of 11 pts pleural effusion had been indicated as a reason for intolerance to prior DAS. Grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities reported in ≥10% of pts included thrombocytopenia (25%), neutropenia (19%), lymphopenia (17%), and hypermagnesemia (12%). Dose reductions and interruptions were used to manage AEs in 50% and 66% of pts. A total of 32 (27%) pts discontinued treatment due to an AE, most commonly hematologic events. In conclusion, BOS therapy continues to demonstrate durable efficacy and manageable toxicity after follow-up of ≥24 mo in CP CML following resistance or intolerance to multiple TKIs, with a majority of pts maintaining response at 2 y and few new transformations, deaths, TEAEs, or discontinuations due to AEs since the prior report ∼1 y earlier (Blood 2012;119:4303–12). n (%) IM + DAS-R IM + DAS-I IM + NIL-R IM + DAS ± NILa Total Evaluableb 37 49 25 4 115 CHR 23 (62) 39 (80) 19 (76) 3 (75) 84 (73) Evaluableb 36 44 26 4 110 MCyR 12 (33) 21 (48) 10 (39) 2 (50) 45 (41) CCyR 7 (19) 19 (43) 7 (27) 2 (50) 35 (32) Treated 38 50 27 4 119 PFS at 2 yc 70% 81% 79% 38% 75% OS at 2 yc 77% 85% 92% 75% 84% R, resistant; I, intolerant. a Includes 3 pts with prior exposure to all 3 TKIs and 1 NIL-I pt. KM rates may be unreliable due to the small number of pts in this cohort. b Received ≥1 dose of BOS and had a valid baseline response assessment. c Based on KM estimates Disclosures: Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Pfizer: Research Funding. Kim:BMS, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marin:Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Dorlhiac-Llacer:Novartis, Bristol Myer Squibb, Pfizer: Research Funding. Bullorsky:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Leip:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Kelly:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turnbull:Pfizer Inc, l3/Inventiv Clinical Solutions: Employment. Besson:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Cortes:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ariad, Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Of Dasatinib For Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase In Japan

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1493.1493 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1493-1493

Author(s):

Kohei Yamaguchi ◽

Kazunori Murai ◽

Shigeki Ito ◽

Tomoaki Akagi ◽

Kazuei Ogawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Major Molecular Response ◽

Once Daily

Abstract Background Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor that has a 325-fold higher potency than imatinib and a 16-fold higher potency than nilotinib in vitro. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were include in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. MMR defined as a BCR-ABL transcript level of 0.1% or lower on the International scale by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in peripheral blood. Secondary end points were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 12 months, the rate of MR4.5 (either (i) detectable disease with <0.0032% BCR-ABL1 IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with >32,000 ABL1 transcripts in the same volume of cDNA used to test for BCR-ABL1) by 12 months and adverse events of dasatinib (UMIN #000006358). Results Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. All except one patient administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. So far, there were 71 patients with 6 months follow-up and 51 patients with 12 months follow-up. The estimated MMR rates were 69.5 % (95%CI, 58.7-80.3 %) by 6 months and 82.7% (95%CI, 73.0-92.4 %) by 12 months. The estimated MR4.5 rates were 27.1 % (95%CI, 16.7-37.5 %) by 6 months and 48.9% (95%CI, 36.0-61.7 %) by 12 months. Only 6 patients were withdrawal because of adverse event (5 patients) and ineffectiveness (1 patient). Conclusion Dasatinib treatment results in higher rates of molecular responses in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients in Japan. Dasatinib as the first-line agent might be acceptable for CML-CP patients because of better clinical efficacy and less toxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Dasatinib versus imatinib (IM) in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP): DASISION 3-year follow-up.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.6504 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 6504-6504 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Andreas Hochhaus ◽

Neil P. Shah ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Michele Baccarani ◽

M. Brigid Bradley-Garelik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Phase ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Transformation Rate ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Intent To Treat

6504 Background: In the phase 3 DASISION trial of dasatinib v IM in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP, dasatinib had higher 12-month rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) (Kantarjian, NEJM 2010;362:2260). By 12 months confirmed CCyR (cCCyR) rates for dasatinib v IM were 77% v 66%, P=0.001, meeting the primary endpoint. Methods: Pts were randomized to receive dasatinib 100 mg once daily (QD; n=259) or IM 400 mg QD (n=260). Results: Minimum 24-month follow-up (median 26.6 months) is reported here. 24-month molecular response rates were higher for dasatinib v IM: MMR (BCR-ABL ≤0.1%) 64% v 46%, P<0.0001; MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤0.01%) 29% v 19%, P=0.0053; MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤0.0032%) 17% v 8%, P=0.0032. MMR rates were higher for dasatinib in all Hasford risk groups (high 73% v 56%; intermediate 61% v 50%; low 73% v 56%). Of pts who achieved MMR at 12 months, on dasatinib v IM, 97% v 92% had maintained their MMR at 24 months, respectively. Pts receiving dasatinib v IM had faster responses; median time to CCyR and MMR was 3.2 v 6.0 and 15 v 36 months, respectively. In an intent-to-treat analysis, fewer pts receiving dasatinib (n=9; 3.5%) transformed to accelerated/blast phase v IM (n=15; 5.8%) on study or during follow-up after discontinuation. 24-month overall and progression-free survival were similar for dasatinib v IM: 95.4% v 95.2% and 93.7% v 92.1% (follow-up is ongoing). Few additional adverse events (AEs) were reported between 12 and 24 months in both arms, with grade 3/4 nonhematologic AE rates ≤1%. In each arm, 10 pts had a BCR-ABL mutation detected at time of discontinuation. For dasatinib v IM, 23% v 25% discontinued treatment for drug-related AEs (7% v 5%), progression (5% v 7%), failure (3% v 4%), unrelated AEs (2% v <1%), death (2% v <1%), and other (4% v 8%). Few pts discontinued between 12 and 24 months for dasatinib (n=19; 7%) and IM (n=16; 6%). Conclusions: Updated data with minimum 36-month follow-up will be presented, including mutation analyses in pts who discontinued, progressed, or had suboptimal response. Pts receiving dasatinib had a lower transformation rate and higher molecular responses v pts receiving IM, supporting the use of dasatinib in newly diagnosed CML-CP.

Download Full-text

BELA trial update: Bosutinib (BOS) versus imatinib (IM) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML) after 30 months of follow-up.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.6512 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 6512-6512 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽

Jeffrey Howard Lipton ◽

Goh Yeow Tee ◽

Luis Felipe Casado ◽

Andrey Zaritskey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Geographic Region ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Primary Reason ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Blast Phase ◽

Grade 3

6512 Background: The BELA study compared the efficacy and safety of BOS (dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor) with IM in newly diagnosed CP CML. Methods: 502 pts with newly diagnosed CP CML were randomized to BOS 500 mg/d (n = 250) or IM 400 mg/d (n = 252) and stratified by Sokal risk group and geographic region. Efficacy analyses included all randomized pts (ITT); safety analyses included all treated pts (BOS, n = 248; IM, n = 251). Data described below are for ≥24 mo of follow-up; updated data for ≥30 mo of follow-up will be presented. Results: Median treatment duration was 27.5 mo in both cohorts; 63% of BOS pts and 71% of IM pts were still receiving treatment. The primary reason for BOS discontinuation was a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; 24% vs 7% with IM); the primary reason for IM discontinuation was disease progression (13% vs 4% with BOS). Cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates by 24 mo were 79% for BOS and 80% for IM. Cumulative major molecular response (MMR) rates by 24 mo were 59% for BOS and 49% for IM (P = 0.019), including 16% and 12% of pts with complete molecular response (4.0-log sensitivity). On-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in 4 (2%) BOS pts and 13 (5%) IM pts. Deaths were reported for 7 BOS pts (6 due to CML progression) and 13 IM pts (10 due to CML progression); 24-mo Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates were 97% (BOS) and 95% (IM). BOS was associated with higher incidences of gastrointestinal events than IM (diarrhea [70% vs 25%], vomiting [32% vs 16%]; primarily transient), but lower incidences of edema (13% vs 40%) and musculoskeletal events (cramps [4% vs 22%], bone pain [4% vs 10%]). Grade ≥3 TEAEs in ≥2% of BOS or IM pts were diarrhea (12% vs 1%), vomiting (3% vs 0%), and rash (2% vs 1%). Grade ≥3 lab abnormalities (≥15% of pts) with BOS and IM were neutropenia (10% vs 24%), thrombocytopenia (14% vs 15%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (23% vs 4%), and hypophosphatemia (6% vs 20%). Conclusions: BOS was effective for newly diagnosed CP CML and had a distinct toxicity profile. With continued follow-up both on-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase and overall survival continue to favor BOS versus IM.

Download Full-text

Results of a Phase II Trial of Dasatinib As Frontline Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) In Chronic Phase (CP)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1700.1700 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1700-1700 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Naveen Pemmaraju ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Rajyalakshmi Luthra ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

Elias Jabbour ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pleural Effusion ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Significant Activity ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1700 Background: Dasatinib is approximately 300 times more potent than imatinib (IM) in vitro and has significant activity in patients (pts) with CML-CP resistant to or intolerant of IM. In 2005 we initiated a phase II trial to study the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in pts with previously untreated CML-CP. Objective: To determine the outcome of pts with CML-CP treated with front-line dasatinib. The primary endpoint was attainment of major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months (mos). Methods: Pts with previously untreated CML-CP within 6 mos from diagnosis were eligible and received dasatinib 100 mg/day, randomized to either 50 mg twice daily (BID) or 100 mg once daily (QD). After 66 pts were accrued, the BID arm was closed and all subsequent pts were treated with 100 mg QD. No prior therapy was allowed except for IM for no more than 1 month, or hydroxyurea. Results: From November 2005 to June 2011, 99 pts have been enrolled (66 on the QD schedule, 33 BID). For the purposes of this analysis, we considered all pts with clonal evolution at baseline (n=6) as accelerated phase and excluded them from the present analysis, therefore leaving 93 pts (62QD, 31 BID) for review. Median age was 48 years (yrs) (range 18–82); 56% were male. Median baseline counts: WBC 22.95 K/uL, PB blasts 0%, BM blasts 3%, BM basophils 2%, and platelets 315; 21 pts (23%) had brief prior exposure to IM. Sokal score by distribution: Low (81%), Intermediate (14%), High (5%). Median follow-up is 29 mos (3–67). Of the 80 evaluable pts who were not in CHR at the start of therapy, 79 (98%) achieved CHR. Of 87 evaluable pts (ie, followed for at least 3 mos), 83 (95%) achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). MMR has been achieved in 75 pts (86%), including 54 pts (67%) with complete molecular response (CMR; ≤0.0032% IS). At 6 mos, 79 (94%) pts had achieved a CCyR and 56 (68%) an MMR; corresponding figures at 12 mos are 95% and 73%, respectively. Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity included fatigue (9%), pain and dyspnea (6% each), memory impairment (5%), headache and sensory neuropathy (4% each), nausea, cardiac arrhythmia, and neurologic (3% each) and diarrhea, visual, and pleural effusion (2% each). Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity (transient) included thrombocytopenia 13%, neutropenia 24%, and anemia 9%. Fifty-two (56%) of 93 pts required transient treatment interruptions and 36 (39%) have required dose reductions. The actual median daily dose for all pts was 100 mg (20–140). Thirteen pts lost CCyR: (including 3 because of non-compliance and 2 transient losses, regained spontaneously). The 24-mo probability of event-free survival (EFS) is 93%.There have been no transformations or deaths on study. Twelve (13%) pts have discontinued therapy: 3 pt's choice, 1 lost to follow up, 4 toxicity (2 pleural effusion, 1 congestive heart failure, 1 headaches), and 4 for loss of major cytogenetic response (MCyR). Three pts have had mutation assessment upon discontinuation and no mutations were identified. Conclusion: Rapid CCyR occurs in nearly all pts with previously untreated CML-CP treated with frontline dasatinib therapy with a favorable toxicity profile. None of the patients have transformed to AP/BP confirming the efficacy of dasatinib as initial therapy for CML-CP. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Jabbour:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Ravandi:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bosutinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia – BELA Trial: 24-Month Follow-up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.455.455 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 455-455 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jorge E Cortes ◽

Anish Maru ◽

Carmino Antonio Antonio De Souza ◽

François Guilhot ◽

Ladan Duvillie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Primary Reason ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Function Test ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 455 Introduction: Bosutinib (SKI-606) is an orally active, dual competitive inhibitor of the Src and Abl tyrosine kinases. The phase 3 BELA study compared bosutinib with imatinib in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to open-label oral bosutinib 500 mg/d (n = 250) or imatinib 400 mg/d (n = 252) and stratified by Sokal score risk group (low, medium, high) and geographical region. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 mo in the intent-to-treat population. Key secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints included major molecular response (MMR) at 12 mo, time to CCyR and MMR, duration of CCyR and MMR, time to and incidence of transformation to accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP) CML, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival. Safety analyses included all treated pts. Results: The median treatment duration was 19.3 mo for bosutinib and 19.5 mo for imatinib; 67% and 74% of pts, respectively, are still receiving therapy. The primary reason for discontinuation of bosutinib was toxicity (23%), while the primary reason for discontinuation of imatinib was disease progression (13%). Rates of CCyR and MMR are shown in the table. The rate of cumulative CCyR by 18 mo was 79% in both arms, and the cumulative rate of MMR by 18 mo was 55% in the bosutinib arm versus 45% in the imatinib arm. Median time to CCyR was faster for bosutinib versus imatinib (12.7 vs 24.6 wk); median time to MMR was also faster for bosutinib versus imatinib (36.9 vs 72.3 wk). Transformation to AP/BP CML while on treatment occurred in 4 (2%) pts on bosutinib and 13 (5%) pts on imatinib. On-study deaths from any cause occurred in 6 (2%) pts receiving bosutinib versus 13 (5%) pts receiving imatinib, and included 5 (2%) and 9 (4%) pts, respectively, who died due to CML progression. Median on-treatment EFS and overall survival were not yet reached for either arm. At 18 mo, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of EFS were 95% for bosutinib versus 91% for imatinib, and the estimates of overall survival were 99% versus 95%, respectively. Bosutinib was associated with higher incidences compared with imatinib of gastrointestinal events (diarrhea [69% vs 22%, respectively], vomiting [32% vs 14%], pyrexia [18% vs 10%], and abdominal pain [13% vs 7%]). In contrast, bosutinib was associated with lower incidences of edema (peripheral edema [4% vs 11%] and periorbital edema [1% vs 14%]) and musculoskeletal events (myalgia [5% vs 11%], muscle cramps [4% vs 22%], and bone pain [4% vs 10%]). Fewer pts on bosutinib experienced grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities of neutropenia (11% vs 24% with imatinib), while the incidences of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were similar between treatment arms (8% with anemia and 14% with thrombocytopenia). Grade 3/4 liver function test abnormalities occurred more frequently with bosutinib versus imatinib (increased alanine aminotransferase [23% vs 4%] and aspartate aminotransferase [12% vs 3%]). Although common with bosutinib, gastrointestinal events and liver function test abnormalities were typically transient, managed with dose modifications, and not life threatening. Conclusions: The study did not meet the primary endpoint (CCyR at 12 mo); early discontinuation of bosutinib due to adverse events may have contributed to this observed lack of difference. However, bosutinib did result in a higher rate of MMR at 12 mo, faster times to MMR and CCyR, fewer events of transformation to AP/BP CML, and fewer overall and CML-related deaths compared with imatinib, suggesting superiority of bosutinib in pts with newly diagnosed CP CML. In addition, the 18-mo estimates for both EFS and OS currently favor bosutinib. Bosutinib and imatinib were each associated with acceptable but distinct toxicity profiles. Based on these results, bosutinib may offer a new therapeutic option for pts with newly diagnosed CP CML. Minimum of 24 mo of follow-up will be presented for all pts. Disclosures: Cortes: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Guilhot:CHU de Poitiers: Employment; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Duvillie:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Powell:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Countouriotis:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Gambacorti-Passerini:Pfizer Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Biodiversity: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Phase CML Who Discontinued Ponatinib in the Frontline Setting

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1580.1580 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1580-1580

Author(s):

Preetesh Jain ◽

Hagop M Kantarjian ◽

Elias Jabbour ◽

Zeev Estrov ◽

Gautam Borthakur ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

The Other ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Vascular Events ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Ponatinib is a novel TKI efficacious in relapsed refractory patients (pts) with CML and in those with T315I mutation. Despite the achievement of deep early responses in most pts observed in the frontline setting, the concern for arterio-thrombotic events led to the discontinuation (DC) of ponatinib frontline clinical trial. In this study, we have assessed the outcomes after DC of ponatinib of pts in a clinical trial of frontline ponatinib in CML-CP. Methods: Fifty one pts with CML-CP were treated with frontline ponatinib in a single-arm, clinical trial between May 2012 and September 2013. Initial dose of ponatinib was 45 mg orally daily in 43 pts and, after amendment, 30 mg in 8 pts. All pts DC ponatinib therapy after June 2014 and were switched to another TKI. Patients were assessed for cause of DC, treatment received after ponatinib DC, response achieved/maintained on subsequent TKI, adverse events (AE) and survival after ponatinib DC. Survival was calculated from the time of ponatinib DC to the time of last follow up. Results: All 51 patients DC ponatinib: 38 per FDA recommendation and 13 due to AE. Median duration of ponatinib therapy was 13.2 months (range-2.1-25.4). At the time of DC, 47/51 (92%) pts were in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and 4 (8%) in partial cytogenetic response (PCyR); 1 pt DC before 3-mo evaluation. Forty (78%) pts were in MMR and 26 (51%) in molecular response 4.5-log (MR4.5). Thirty-six (70%) pts were switched to dasatinib, 7 (14%) to imatinib, and 4 (8%) each to nilotinib and bosutinib. After switching to another TKI, with a median of 13 months (range, 0.2 to 26.3) of follow-up, 2 pts have lost their cytogenetic response (both PCyR on ponatinib), 1 pt improved from PCyR to CCyR and one maintained PCyR; all 47 (92%) pts with CCyR on ponatinib maintained this response. Molecular responses improved in some pts: 6 improved from no MMR to MMR; 1 to MR4.5 (median time on ponatinib 4 months; median time on subsequent TKI 17 months); 11 from MMR to MR4.5 (median time on ponatinib 13 months; median time on subsequent TKI 17 months). One pt (treated with imatinib 400) lost MR4.5 to no MMR after 2 months. At last follow-up 37 pts (72%) had MR4.5 and 45 (90%) MMR. Two pts died after ponatinib DC. One pt was treated with imatinib 400 and developed grade-3 edema and recurrent lung cancer; the second was switched to dasatinib and had recurrent progressive peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Four pts had events (2 deaths, 1 secondary MDS with -7 and 1 pt lost major CyR). Median post ponatinib survival (Figure-1) and median post ponatinib event free survival (not shown) was not reached (1-year OS 98% and EFS 95%). Forty five pts continued on their first post-ponatinib TKIs, 5 required 2 post-ponatinib TKI and 1 pt received 3 different TKIs after DC. The most common cause for post-ponatinib TKI switch was toxicity (n=6). Of the 36 pts switched to dasatinib, 5 discontinued: 4 due to pleural effusion and 1 with acute renal failure. 29/36 pts (81%) were in MMR before switch and all maintained MMR; 4 pts achieved MMR after switch to dasatinib. Four pts developed grade 3-4 non hematological vascular AEs (3 among pts with such events while on ponatinib and 1 new vascular event within 3 months of ponatinib DC). Of the 4 pts switched to nilotinib, 1 DC within 3 months due to grade-3 pancreatitis and also developed grade-1 pulmonary hypertension with 1 month of discontinuing ponatinib. This pt was then switched to bosutinib. The other 3 pts maintained MMR and had no vascular events. Of the 4 pts switched to bosutinib, one developed MDS, one was switched back to ponatinib off protocol (patient's choice), 1 lost cytogenetic response and one DC therapy after 1 month and maintains MR4.5 (this pt had TIA while on ponatinib, developed cerebral infarct within 1 month post ponatinib). Seven pts switched to imatinib. One developed a new PAD within 3 months of ponatinib DC (history of MI while on ponatinib). The other 6 pts maintained MMR on imatinib. Overall, 15 pts who had aggravated hypertension on ponatinib were under control after DC of ponatinib. Conclusion: Treatment with 2nd generation TKIs and imatinib was effective and safe in pts who DC ponatinib, and most pts were able to maintain/improve the responses achieved on ponatinib. Ponatinib-associated hypertension was usually reversible after DC and most vascular events with subsequent TKIs occurred in patients with prior such events while on ponatinib. Figure 1. Post ponatinib survival in patients Figure 1. Post ponatinib survival in patients Disclosures Jabbour: pfizer: Research Funding; ariad: Research Funding; teva: Consultancy; teva: Research Funding; pfizer: Consultancy; bms: Consultancy; ariad: Consultancy. Estrov:incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding. Pemmaraju:Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cortes:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Final Study Results of Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Patients Receiving Radotinib 300 Mg BID or Imatinib: Rerise 48 Months Follow-up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110568 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1733-1733

Author(s):

Young Rok Do ◽

Jae-Yong Kwak ◽

Hawk Kim ◽

Jeong-A Kim ◽

Hyeoung-Joon Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Safety Data ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Standards Of Care ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Study Results

Abstract Background: In RERISE phase 3 study, radotinib demonstrated significantly higher and faster rates of major molecular response (MMR) than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. By 36 months follow up, MMR (BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 0.1%) and MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1IS ≤ 0.0032%) in radotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) were higher than imatinib group. Also, early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months could predict better long term outcomes in both radotinib and imatinib groups. Here, authors updated 48 months long-term benefits and risks of 300mg bid and imatinib 400mg qd from RERISE phase 3 study (NCT01511289). Methods: RERISE study was randomized trial of radotinib 300 mg bid (n=79), radotinib 400 mg bid (n=81), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (qd) (n=81) in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. We evaluated long-term MMR and MR4.5, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) including safety data by 48 months. Results: At the study completion, 53% of patients with radotinib and 44% of patients with imatinib treated were remained. MMR and MR4.5 continued to be higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid compared with imatinib 400mg qd (Table). Especially, MMR rate by 48 months was significantly higher for radotinib compared to imatinib (76% vs 56%; P=0.0070, Figure). Also, early molecular response (EMR) at 3 months were observed in 86% of patients in the radotinib 300 mg bid group and 68% in the imatinib group (P = 0.0179). More patients treated with radotinib 300mg bid who had EMR at 3 months achieved MMR and MR4.5 by 48 months: 84% and 53% in the radotinib 300 mg bid group and 71% and 44% in the imatinib group, respectively. 48 months estimated OS and PFS rate were not significantly different in two groups (99% vs 94%; P=0.3224, 97% vs 94%; P=0.4328). Treatment failure was lower in radotinib group compared with imatinib group (Table). The safety profiles were consistent with those previously reported and most of adverse events (AEs) developed within 12 months. No new or unexpected safety events were reported in both arms by 48 months and no serious CVE related with radotinib reported. Conclusions: With a minimum 48 months follow-up, radotinib continued to demonstrate higher rates of MMR and MR4.5 than imatinib in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Also, these responses with radotinib were earlier and deeper compared with imatinib. Up to 48 months, no new and serious safety events related with radotinib reported. These results demonstrate that radotinib may have higher possibility of treatment- free remission (TFR) on frontline therapy as well as it can be one of the standards of care in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Bunworasate: IL-YANG: Research Funding. Comia:IL-YANG: Research Funding. Mun:IL-YANG: Research Funding. Caguioa:IL-YANG: Research Funding. Kim:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ilyang: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Activity of Nilotinib (AMN107), a Novel Selective Potent Oral Bcr-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-Positive Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML-CP).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.2172.2172 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 2172-2172 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Elias Jabbour ◽

Jorge Cortes ◽

Francis Giles ◽

Susan O’Brien ◽

Laurie Letvak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Philadelphia Chromosome ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Patient Choice ◽

Myelogenous Leukemia ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Early Results ◽

Grade 3

Nilotinib is a novel, highly selective oral Bcr-Abl inhibitor which is approximately 30-fold more potent than imatinib. High response rates with nilotinib were observed in all CML phases post imatinib failure. We evaluated the efficacy of nilotinib in newly diagnosed Ph-positive CML-CP. Thirteen patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive CML-CP were treated with nilotinib 400 mg orally twice daily. The median age was 49 years (range, 24–72 years). The Sokal risk at pretreatment was low in 10 patients, intermediate in 2, and high in 1. The median follow-up is 8 months (range, 3–12 months). All patients have reached the 6-month evaluation. The rate of complete cytogenetic response [CGCR] (Ph 0%) at 3 and 6 months was 93% and 100%, respectively. This is compared with a CGCR at 3 months of 37% and with imatinib 400 mg/d and 61% with imatinib 800 mg/d (p=0.0002) and 54% and 85% at 6 months, respectively (p<0.0001), in historical data of newly diagnosed patients treated in studies at M. D. Anderson. Six patients were evaluable at 9 months and all were in CGCR. The median QPCR with nilotinib at 3, 6, and 9 months were, respectively, 3.4% (range, 0.02–29.5%), 1.8% (range, 0.004–9.13%), and 0.54% (range, 0.04–1.28%). At 3-month follow-up, major molecular response (BCR-ABL/ABL ratio<0.05%) was observed in 1/13 patients (8%) and in 6/11 (55%) at 6-month. Grade 3–4 myelosuppression was observed in 3 of the 13 patients and other grade 3–4 side effects in 3 patients (increased lipase in 2 and musculo-skeletal pain in 1). Four patients had their dose reduced to 400 mg daily due to extramedullary toxicity. Two patients were taken off after 6 and 8 months (patient choice) and switched to imatinib. In conclusion, early results with nilotinib 400 mg orally twice daily suggest significant efficacy manifested by complete cytogenetic responses in nearly all patients as early as 3 months after the start of therapy with a favorable toxicity profile.

Download Full-text