BELA trial update: Bosutinib (BOS) versus imatinib (IM) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML) after 30 months of follow-up.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6512-6512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽  
Jeffrey Howard Lipton ◽  
Goh Yeow Tee ◽  
Luis Felipe Casado ◽  
Andrey Zaritskey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Geographic Region ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Primary Reason ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
Grade 3

6512 Background: The BELA study compared the efficacy and safety of BOS (dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor) with IM in newly diagnosed CP CML. Methods: 502 pts with newly diagnosed CP CML were randomized to BOS 500 mg/d (n = 250) or IM 400 mg/d (n = 252) and stratified by Sokal risk group and geographic region. Efficacy analyses included all randomized pts (ITT); safety analyses included all treated pts (BOS, n = 248; IM, n = 251). Data described below are for ≥24 mo of follow-up; updated data for ≥30 mo of follow-up will be presented. Results: Median treatment duration was 27.5 mo in both cohorts; 63% of BOS pts and 71% of IM pts were still receiving treatment. The primary reason for BOS discontinuation was a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE; 24% vs 7% with IM); the primary reason for IM discontinuation was disease progression (13% vs 4% with BOS). Cumulative complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rates by 24 mo were 79% for BOS and 80% for IM. Cumulative major molecular response (MMR) rates by 24 mo were 59% for BOS and 49% for IM (P = 0.019), including 16% and 12% of pts with complete molecular response (4.0-log sensitivity). On-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in 4 (2%) BOS pts and 13 (5%) IM pts. Deaths were reported for 7 BOS pts (6 due to CML progression) and 13 IM pts (10 due to CML progression); 24-mo Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates were 97% (BOS) and 95% (IM). BOS was associated with higher incidences of gastrointestinal events than IM (diarrhea [70% vs 25%], vomiting [32% vs 16%]; primarily transient), but lower incidences of edema (13% vs 40%) and musculoskeletal events (cramps [4% vs 22%], bone pain [4% vs 10%]). Grade ≥3 TEAEs in ≥2% of BOS or IM pts were diarrhea (12% vs 1%), vomiting (3% vs 0%), and rash (2% vs 1%). Grade ≥3 lab abnormalities (≥15% of pts) with BOS and IM were neutropenia (10% vs 24%), thrombocytopenia (14% vs 15%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (23% vs 4%), and hypophosphatemia (6% vs 20%). Conclusions: BOS was effective for newly diagnosed CP CML and had a distinct toxicity profile. With continued follow-up both on-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase and overall survival continue to favor BOS versus IM.

Bosutinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia – BELA Trial: 24-Month Follow-up

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 455-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E Cortes ◽  
Anish Maru ◽  
Carmino Antonio Antonio De Souza ◽  
François Guilhot ◽  
Ladan Duvillie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Primary Reason ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Function Test ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 455 Introduction: Bosutinib (SKI-606) is an orally active, dual competitive inhibitor of the Src and Abl tyrosine kinases. The phase 3 BELA study compared bosutinib with imatinib in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to open-label oral bosutinib 500 mg/d (n = 250) or imatinib 400 mg/d (n = 252) and stratified by Sokal score risk group (low, medium, high) and geographical region. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 mo in the intent-to-treat population. Key secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints included major molecular response (MMR) at 12 mo, time to CCyR and MMR, duration of CCyR and MMR, time to and incidence of transformation to accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP) CML, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival. Safety analyses included all treated pts. Results: The median treatment duration was 19.3 mo for bosutinib and 19.5 mo for imatinib; 67% and 74% of pts, respectively, are still receiving therapy. The primary reason for discontinuation of bosutinib was toxicity (23%), while the primary reason for discontinuation of imatinib was disease progression (13%). Rates of CCyR and MMR are shown in the table. The rate of cumulative CCyR by 18 mo was 79% in both arms, and the cumulative rate of MMR by 18 mo was 55% in the bosutinib arm versus 45% in the imatinib arm. Median time to CCyR was faster for bosutinib versus imatinib (12.7 vs 24.6 wk); median time to MMR was also faster for bosutinib versus imatinib (36.9 vs 72.3 wk). Transformation to AP/BP CML while on treatment occurred in 4 (2%) pts on bosutinib and 13 (5%) pts on imatinib. On-study deaths from any cause occurred in 6 (2%) pts receiving bosutinib versus 13 (5%) pts receiving imatinib, and included 5 (2%) and 9 (4%) pts, respectively, who died due to CML progression. Median on-treatment EFS and overall survival were not yet reached for either arm. At 18 mo, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of EFS were 95% for bosutinib versus 91% for imatinib, and the estimates of overall survival were 99% versus 95%, respectively. Bosutinib was associated with higher incidences compared with imatinib of gastrointestinal events (diarrhea [69% vs 22%, respectively], vomiting [32% vs 14%], pyrexia [18% vs 10%], and abdominal pain [13% vs 7%]). In contrast, bosutinib was associated with lower incidences of edema (peripheral edema [4% vs 11%] and periorbital edema [1% vs 14%]) and musculoskeletal events (myalgia [5% vs 11%], muscle cramps [4% vs 22%], and bone pain [4% vs 10%]). Fewer pts on bosutinib experienced grade 3/4 laboratory abnormalities of neutropenia (11% vs 24% with imatinib), while the incidences of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia were similar between treatment arms (8% with anemia and 14% with thrombocytopenia). Grade 3/4 liver function test abnormalities occurred more frequently with bosutinib versus imatinib (increased alanine aminotransferase [23% vs 4%] and aspartate aminotransferase [12% vs 3%]). Although common with bosutinib, gastrointestinal events and liver function test abnormalities were typically transient, managed with dose modifications, and not life threatening. Conclusions: The study did not meet the primary endpoint (CCyR at 12 mo); early discontinuation of bosutinib due to adverse events may have contributed to this observed lack of difference. However, bosutinib did result in a higher rate of MMR at 12 mo, faster times to MMR and CCyR, fewer events of transformation to AP/BP CML, and fewer overall and CML-related deaths compared with imatinib, suggesting superiority of bosutinib in pts with newly diagnosed CP CML. In addition, the 18-mo estimates for both EFS and OS currently favor bosutinib. Bosutinib and imatinib were each associated with acceptable but distinct toxicity profiles. Based on these results, bosutinib may offer a new therapeutic option for pts with newly diagnosed CP CML. Minimum of 24 mo of follow-up will be presented for all pts. Disclosures: Cortes: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Guilhot:CHU de Poitiers: Employment; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Duvillie:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Powell:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Countouriotis:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Gambacorti-Passerini:Pfizer Inc: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Biodiversity: Honoraria.

Preliminary Activity of Nilotinib (AMN107), a Novel Selective Potent Oral Bcr-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-Positive Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML-CP).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2172-2172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Francis Giles ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Laurie Letvak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Grade 3

Nilotinib is a novel, highly selective oral Bcr-Abl inhibitor which is approximately 30-fold more potent than imatinib. High response rates with nilotinib were observed in all CML phases post imatinib failure. We evaluated the efficacy of nilotinib in newly diagnosed Ph-positive CML-CP. Thirteen patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive CML-CP were treated with nilotinib 400 mg orally twice daily. The median age was 49 years (range, 24–72 years). The Sokal risk at pretreatment was low in 10 patients, intermediate in 2, and high in 1. The median follow-up is 8 months (range, 3–12 months). All patients have reached the 6-month evaluation. The rate of complete cytogenetic response [CGCR] (Ph 0%) at 3 and 6 months was 93% and 100%, respectively. This is compared with a CGCR at 3 months of 37% and with imatinib 400 mg/d and 61% with imatinib 800 mg/d (p=0.0002) and 54% and 85% at 6 months, respectively (p<0.0001), in historical data of newly diagnosed patients treated in studies at M. D. Anderson. Six patients were evaluable at 9 months and all were in CGCR. The median QPCR with nilotinib at 3, 6, and 9 months were, respectively, 3.4% (range, 0.02–29.5%), 1.8% (range, 0.004–9.13%), and 0.54% (range, 0.04–1.28%). At 3-month follow-up, major molecular response (BCR-ABL/ABL ratio<0.05%) was observed in 1/13 patients (8%) and in 6/11 (55%) at 6-month. Grade 3–4 myelosuppression was observed in 3 of the 13 patients and other grade 3–4 side effects in 3 patients (increased lipase in 2 and musculo-skeletal pain in 1). Four patients had their dose reduced to 400 mg daily due to extramedullary toxicity. Two patients were taken off after 6 and 8 months (patient choice) and switched to imatinib. In conclusion, early results with nilotinib 400 mg orally twice daily suggest significant efficacy manifested by complete cytogenetic responses in nearly all patients as early as 3 months after the start of therapy with a favorable toxicity profile.

Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) Efficacy and Safety in Patients (pts) with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Lymphoid (CML-LB) or Myeloid Blast (CML-MB) Phase Who Are Imatinib-Resistant (Im-r) or -Intolerant (Im-i).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 745-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
A. Hochhaus ◽  
S. Coutre ◽  
J.F. Apperley ◽  
N. Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Pts with CML-LB or CML-MB have a poor prognosis with survival from onset of blast crisis of 3–6 months. Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®, formerly BMS-354825) is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC, which results in complete hematologic and cytogenetic responses in pts with CML-LB or CML-MB who are Im-i, or who have disease that is Im-r. Between January and June 2005, 48 CML-LB pts were enrolled in the START-L trial, and 109 CML-MB pts in the START-B trial both of which were open label, multi-center, global phase II studies. As previously reported, with a minimum of 6-months follow up in the combined blast-phase pts, the major hematologic response (MHR) rate was 32% including 26% complete hematologic responses (CHR) and the major cytogenic response (MCyR) rate was 38%, including 31% complete cytogenetic responses (CCyR). The median duration of MHR had not been reached and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.3 months (mo). In both studies, dasatinib was given orally, 70 mg twice daily (BID) with escalation to 100 mg BID for poor response or reductions to 50 mg and 40 mg BID for toxicity. Pts had weekly blood counts and monthly bone marrow exams, including cytogenetics. Mutation analysis was conducted at baseline and at end of study. Quantitative PCR was carried out at pretreatment and at the time of CCyR. Overall, among all blast-crisis pts in both studies, 90% were Im-r. Due to the small number of Im-i pts, data for all pts is presented. Among the 157 pts, 56% were male, with a median age of 54 years (range 17–81). The median time from diagnosis of CML was 45 mo (range 2–216). Prior therapy included Im &gt;600 mg/d in 50%, with Im for &gt;3 years in 36% and stem cell transplantation in 19% of the pts. At baseline, 57% of pts had WBC &lt;20,000/mm3, 69% had platelets &lt;100,000/mm3, and 17% had extramedullary disease outside of the spleen. In the 149 pts with baseline mutation data, Im-resistant BCR-ABL mutations were observed in 50%. With a minimum of 9 mo follow up on all pts, 19% pts remained on treatment with disease progression as the most common reason for discontinuation. Overall, doses were reduced in 33% of pts and interrupted in 59%, most commonly due to non-hematologic toxicities. Dasatinib dose was escalated in 43% of pts. The median duration of therapy was 3.4 mo (0.03–18) in all pts and was 14 mo (6–18) in pts still on treatment. The MHR rate was 34% including 27% CHR; the MCyR was 38% including 31% CCyR. Of the 73 pts with baseline mutations, the MHR rate was 32%. The median duration of MHR still has not been reached and the median PFS was 4.3 mo. Among all pts, grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 17% and 68%, respectively and grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 17% and 63%, respectively. Most frequent non-hematologic toxicities included diarrhea in 37% (grade 3–4, 5%), pleural effusion in 27% (grade 3–4, 11%), vomiting in 22% (grade 3–4, 3%), nausea in 20% (grade 3–4, 3%), and fatigue in 21% (grade 3–4, 3%) of pts. Dasatinib has efficacy in pts with blast phase CML including some with substantial duration of response and PFS. Updated efficacy (including molecular response), safety, and mutational analysis data will be presented at the meeting.

Occurrence, Management, and Outcomes In Patients with Pleural Effusion During Dasatinib Treatment for Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-CP) In the First-Line Setting: Analysis of the DASISION Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2282-2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimmo Porkka ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Satu Mustjoki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Management Interventions ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2282 Background: The Phase 3 DASISION trial comparing dasatinib 100 mg once daily with imatinib 400 mg once daily as initial treatment in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP has demonstrated superior efficacy and favorable safety of dasatinib after a minimum of 12 months of follow-up (Kantarjian, H, et al. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2260). While fluid retention was more frequent with imatinib than with dasatinib, pleural effusion was seen only with dasatinib. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of pts experiencing pleural effusion, a clinically relevant adverse drug reaction. Methods: 519 pts with newly diagnosed, treatment-naive CML-CP (median disease duration of 1 month) were randomly assigned to either dasatinib 100 mg once daily (259 pts) or imatinib 400 mg one daily (260 pts). Key endpoints included complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR) and safety. All pts were assessed by chest x-ray at baseline and at 6 months after randomization, or more frequently, if indicated clinically. Pts with pleural effusion at baseline were excluded. Pleural effusion was graded according to CTCAE version 3 (grade 1, asymptomatic; grade 2, symptomatic, up to 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 3, symptomatic requiring supplemental oxygen, < 2 therapeutic thoracenteses; grade 4, life-threatening, hemodynamic instability). Results: After a minimum follow-up of 12 months with median treatment duration of 14.3 months (range, 0.3–25.8), 26 (10%, median age, 60 years) of the 258 dasatinib-treated pts (median age, 46 years) experienced pleural effusion. Of the pts with pleural effusion, 6 (23%) had low, 17 (65%) had intermediate and 3 (12%) had high Hasford risk scores. There were no grade 3 or 4 pleural effusion events. All events were grade 1(2%) or grade 2 (8%). Most events (n = 22, 85%) occurred more than 8 weeks after the start of study drug. In pts who had a pleural effusion, the median time to the event was 28 weeks (range, 4–88). Lymphocytosis (defined as peripheral blood lymphocyte count > 3.6 × 109/L) was noted in 11 (42%) of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, as compared to 46 (20%) of 232 pts with no pleural effusion. Pleural effusion was managed by dose modification and/or medical intervention. Therapy was interrupted in 19 pts, and the dose of dasatinib was reduced in 8 pts (4 pts, to 80 mg; 1 pt, to 70 mg; 3 pts, to 50 mg). Twelve pts received diuretics, 7 received corticosteroids, and only 1 pt underwent therapeutic thoracentesis. Only 3 pts (1.2%) discontinued therapy due to pleural effusion (grade 2). Eleven pts who continued dasatinib had resolution of their pleural effusion. Five pts had recurrent effusions. Of the 26 pts with pleural effusion, 24 (92%) achieved a CCyR and 17 (65%) achieved a MMR by 12 months of treatment; the corresponding CCyR and MMR rates in the total pt population were 83% and 46%, respectively Seven of the 8 pts with pleural effusion who reduced their dose achieved CCyR and MMR. Conclusion: In pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP treated with dasatinib as initial therapy, pleural effusion was mild to moderate in severity, and was manageable with dose interruption and/reduction and/or a short course of diuretics and/or corticosteroids. The occurrence of pleural effusion and management interventions did not negatively affect the achievement of CCyR or MMR. These findings are in line with data reported previously for second-line dasatinib in CML pts resistant or intolerant to imatinib (Porkka, K, et al. Cancer 2010;116:377). Furthermore, pleural effusion and peripheral lymphocytosis may be indicative of immune-mediated antitumor activity of dasatinib. Disclosures: Porkka: BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Baccarani: Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian: BMS, Pfizer and Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Mustjoki: BMS, Novartis: Honoraria. Bradley-Garelik: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhu: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Cortes: Brostol-Myers Squibb, Novartis and Wyeth: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Dasatinib in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib: Results of the CA180013 ’START-C’ Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6508-6508 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hochhaus ◽  
H. Kantarjian ◽  
M. Baccarani ◽  
F. Cervantes ◽  
T. Facon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Resistant ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

6508 Background: Dasatinib (BMS-354825) is a novel, oral, multi-targeted kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC kinases with proven preclinical and clinical activity against imatinib resistant BCR-ABL mutations. Methods: CA180013 is an open-label Phase II study of dasatinib in imatinib-resistant (IM-R) or -intolerant (IM-I) patients (pts) with CP-CML. Between February-August 2005, 424 pts were recruited from 75 centers worldwide. Dasatinib was given at 70 mg twice daily (BID) with dose escalation to 90 mg BID in pts lacking response, and dose reductions to 50 and 40 mg BID for toxicity. Evaluations were weekly blood counts for the first 12 weeks; bone marrow cytology and cytogenetics every 3 months. The primary endpoint was rate of major cytogenetic response (MCyR; ≤35% Philadelphia pos. metaphases) in IM-R pts. Results: Data are currently available from the first 186 pts (127 IM-R, 59 IM-I) accrued prior to May 12, 2005. Median age was 59 yrs (range 24–79); 46% were male. Median time from diagnosis of CML was 64 months. Of the IM-R pts, 72% received IM >3 yrs, and 72% had >600 mg/day of IM. Overall, 70% had received prior interferon alpha. 62 (33%) pts achieved a prior MCyR to IM. With ≥6 months of follow up, 168 (90%) pts had a complete hematologic response (CHR). MCyR were achieved in 83 (45%) pts including 40 (31%) of IM-R pts, and 43 (73%) of IM-I pts. Mutations in the BCR-ABL domain were found in 65/176 (37%) pts; 57 (88%) achieved CHR, and 24 (37%) MCyR. Molecular response analysis is ongoing. 160 (86%) pts remain on study without progression. Grade 3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia was reported in 83 (45%) pts and 85 (46%) pts with onset after 4–8 weeks of therapy in most pts. Temporary dose interruptions occurred in 146 (78%), and dose reductions in 96 (52%) pts with a median daily of 108 (range 19–169) mg. Non-hematologic toxicity consisted mainly of Grade 1/2 diarrhea, headache, superficial edema, and pleural effusion, with ≤2% Grade 3/4. There was no cross-intolerance between dasatinib and IM. Conclusions: Dasatinib demonstrated substantial hematologic and cytogenetic activity in IM-R and IM-I pts with CP-CML. An updated analysis of 424 pts with ≥6 months of follow up will be presented. [Table: see text]

Dasatinib versus imatinib (IM) in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP): DASISION 3-year follow-up.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6504-6504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Neil P. Shah ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
M. Brigid Bradley-Garelik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Transformation Rate ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat

6504 Background: In the phase 3 DASISION trial of dasatinib v IM in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP, dasatinib had higher 12-month rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) (Kantarjian, NEJM 2010;362:2260). By 12 months confirmed CCyR (cCCyR) rates for dasatinib v IM were 77% v 66%, P=0.001, meeting the primary endpoint. Methods: Pts were randomized to receive dasatinib 100 mg once daily (QD; n=259) or IM 400 mg QD (n=260). Results: Minimum 24-month follow-up (median 26.6 months) is reported here. 24-month molecular response rates were higher for dasatinib v IM: MMR (BCR-ABL ≤0.1%) 64% v 46%, P<0.0001; MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤0.01%) 29% v 19%, P=0.0053; MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤0.0032%) 17% v 8%, P=0.0032. MMR rates were higher for dasatinib in all Hasford risk groups (high 73% v 56%; intermediate 61% v 50%; low 73% v 56%). Of pts who achieved MMR at 12 months, on dasatinib v IM, 97% v 92% had maintained their MMR at 24 months, respectively. Pts receiving dasatinib v IM had faster responses; median time to CCyR and MMR was 3.2 v 6.0 and 15 v 36 months, respectively. In an intent-to-treat analysis, fewer pts receiving dasatinib (n=9; 3.5%) transformed to accelerated/blast phase v IM (n=15; 5.8%) on study or during follow-up after discontinuation. 24-month overall and progression-free survival were similar for dasatinib v IM: 95.4% v 95.2% and 93.7% v 92.1% (follow-up is ongoing). Few additional adverse events (AEs) were reported between 12 and 24 months in both arms, with grade 3/4 nonhematologic AE rates ≤1%. In each arm, 10 pts had a BCR-ABL mutation detected at time of discontinuation. For dasatinib v IM, 23% v 25% discontinued treatment for drug-related AEs (7% v 5%), progression (5% v 7%), failure (3% v 4%), unrelated AEs (2% v <1%), death (2% v <1%), and other (4% v 8%). Few pts discontinued between 12 and 24 months for dasatinib (n=19; 7%) and IM (n=16; 6%). Conclusions: Updated data with minimum 36-month follow-up will be presented, including mutation analyses in pts who discontinued, progressed, or had suboptimal response. Pts receiving dasatinib had a lower transformation rate and higher molecular responses v pts receiving IM, supporting the use of dasatinib in newly diagnosed CML-CP.

scholarly journals Bosutinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the BELA Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3486-3492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Tim H. Brümmendorf ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
End Point

Purpose Bosutinib is an oral Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The phase III Bosutinib Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (BELA) trial compared bosutinib with imatinib in newly diagnosed, chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients and Methods A total of 502 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to bosutinib 500 mg per day or imatinib 400 mg per day. Results The complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate at 12 months was not different for bosutinib (70%; 95% CI, 64% to 76%) versus imatinib (68%; 95% CI, 62% to 74%; two-sided P = .601); therefore, the study did not achieve its primary end point. The major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months was higher with bosutinib (41%; 95% CI, 35% to 47%) compared with imatinib (27%; 95% CI, 22% to 33%; two-sided P < .001). Time to CCyR and MMR was faster with bosutinib compared with imatinib (two-sided P < .001 for both). On-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in four patients (2%) on bosutinib compared with 10 patients (4%) on imatinib. A total of three CML-related deaths occurred on the bosutinib arm compared with eight on the imatinib arm. The safety profiles of bosutinib and imatinib were distinct; GI and liver-related events were more frequent with bosutinib, whereas neutropenia, musculoskeletal disorders, and edema were more frequent with imatinib. Conclusion This ongoing trial did not meet its primary end point of CCyR at 12 months, despite the observed higher MMR rate at 12 months, faster times to CCyR and MMR, fewer on-treatment transformations to accelerated/blast phase, and fewer CML-related deaths with bosutinib compared with imatinib. Each drug had a distinct safety profile.

Efficacy of Nilotinib (AMN107) in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Early Chronic Phase (CML-CP).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 29-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Alexandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
P Value ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Treatment Interruptions ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Nilotinib is a novel, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with increased selectivity against Bcr-Abl that is approximately 30-fold more potent than imatinib. High response rates have been reported with nilotinib therapy in CML after imatinib failure. Methods: We evaluated the efficacy of nilotinib as first line therapy in pts with newly diagnosed Ph-positive CML-CP. The primary objective was to estimate the proportion of pts attaining major molecular response (BCR-ABL/ABL ratio ≤0.05% in our lab) at 12 months (mo). Results: Thirty-two pts have been treated with nilotinib 400 mg orally twice daily for a median of 5 months (mo) (range, 1 to 31 mo). The median age was 47 years (yrs) (range, 24–73 yrs). The Sokal risk at pretreatment was low in 21 (70%) pts, intermediate in 6 (20%), and high in 3 (10%). The rate of complete cytogenetic response [CCyR] (Ph 0%) at 3, 6 and 12 mo compares favorably to those observed in historical controls treated with imatinib 400 mg or 800 mg daily: The median QPCR with nilotinib at 3, 6, and 12 months were, respectively, 0.52% (range, 0.0–29.5%), 0.03% (range, 0.0–9.13%), and 0.09% (range, 0.0–16.21%). At 3 mo follow-up, major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABL/ABL ratio ≤0.05%) was observed in 3/22 patients (14%), 7/13 (54%) at 6 mo, and 5/11 (45%) at 12 mo. 12-mo rates of MMR for the historical imatinib groups treated at 400 mg and 800 mg were 24% and 47%, respectively (p=0.02). None of the molecular responses has been lost while on therapy. Grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 2 (7%) pts, and thrombocytopenia in 1 (3%). Other grade 3–4 adverse events included elevation of lipase (n=3, 9%), or bilirubin (n=2; 6%), and amylase elevation, back pain, and infection (1 each). Twelve pts had transient treatment interruptions (median 11 days), most frequently due to pain (n=3; musculoskeletal 2, abdominal 1), lipase elevation (n=2). Seven patients had their dose reduced to 400 mg daily, 2 to 200 mg twice daily, and 1 to 200 mg daily due to extramedullary toxicity. Three patients decided to change therapy after 4, 6 and 8 months; 2 switched to imatinib and 1 received SCT. Conclusion: Nilotinib 400 mg orally twice daily suggest significant efficacy manifested by complete cytogenetic responses in nearly all patients as early as 3 months after the start of therapy with a favorable toxicity profile. Percent with CCyR (No. evaluable) Months on Therapy Nilotinib Imatinib 400 mg Imatinib 800 mg P value 3mo 95 (22) 37 (49) 62 (202) < 0.0001 6mo 100 (13) 54 (48) 82 (199) <0.0001 12mo 100 (11) 65 (48) 86 (197) 0.0007

Efficacy of Nilotinib (formerly AMN107) in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed, Previously Untreated Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph)-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Early Chronic Phase (CML-CP)

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 446-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Dan Jones ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Marina Konopleva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
P Value ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Treatment Interruptions ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Nilotinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with high selectivity towards Bcr-Abl and approximately 30-fold more potent than imatinib, and is effective in patients with CML after imatinib failure. We initiated a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of nilotinib as 1st line therapy in pts with newly diagnosed CML-CP. Aims: To investigate the efficacy and safety of nilotinib as initial therapy for patients with CML-CP. Methods: The primary objective was to estimate the proportion of pts attaining major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months (mo). Pts with untreated CML-CP (or with &lt;1 months of therapy with imatinib) were eligible and received nilotinib 400mg twice daily. A cohort of patients with previously untreated CML in accelerated phase (AP) was also included. Results: Forty-nine pts have been treated for a median of 13 months (mo). The median age was 47 years (yrs) (range, 21 to 81); 69% are Sokal low risk. Eight (16%) had received imatinib for &lt;1 months. Overall, 46/48 (96%) of evaluable CP pts achieved a complete cytogenetic response [CCyR]. The rate of CCyR at 3, 6 and 12 mo for pts in CP compares favorably to those observed in historical controls treated with imatinib 400mg or 800 mg daily: Percent with CCyR (No. evaluable) Months on therapy Nilotinib Imatinib 400mg Imatinib 800mg P value 3 93 (45) 37 (49) 62 (202) &lt; 0.0001 6 100 (36) 54 (48) 82 (199) &lt; 0.0001 12 96 (27) 65 (48) 86 (197) 0.0003 18 92 (12) 68 (38) 89 (179) 0.0042 24 91 (11) 70 (40) 88 (173) 0.0151 MMR was observed in 45% at 6 mo and 52% at 12 mo. Two of 44 (5%) evaluable pts have achieved confirmed complete molecular response, and 3 others unconfirmed (ie, only achieved on their last assessment). Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity (transient) included thrombocytopenia in 10%, neutropenia in 12%, and anemia in 2%. Grade 3–4 non-hematologic adverse events (regardless of causality) included elevation of bilirubin in 8% and lipase in 6%. 19 (36%) pts had transient treatment interruptions and 17 (32%) had dose reductions. The actual median dose is 800mg daily. Three pts have come off study: 1 pt’s choice and 2 because of toxicity (1 liver, 1 pericardial effusion). One of them (liver toxicity) transformed to blast phase shortly after coming off study. Estimated 24 month EFS (event = loss of CHR, loss of MCyR, AP/BP, death, or off because of toxicity) is 95%. Conclusion: Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily induces a CCyR in nearly all patients as early as 3 months after the start of therapy with a favorable toxicity profile. Accrual is ongoing.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Radotinib Compared with Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients: 12 Months Result of Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 476-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Yong Kwak ◽  
Hawk Kim ◽  
Jeong A Kim ◽  
Young Rok Do ◽  
Hyeoung Joon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Radotinib is a second generation BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed by IL-YANG Pharm. Co., Ltd (Seoul, South Korea) and approved by the Korea FDA for the treatment of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients who have failed prior TKIs. We conducted the randomized, open-label, phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of radotinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of newly diagnosed CML-CP. Methods Based on baseline demographics and Sokal risk score, 241 patients were randomized 1:1:1 to radotinib 300 mg twice daily (bid) (n=79), radotinib 400 mg bid (n=81), or imatinib 400 mg once daily (qd) (n=81). The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months and molecular response was assessed by RQ-PCR at baseline and every 3 months. Secondary endpoints were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), MR4.5 by 12 months, and the rate of progression to accelerate phase or blast crisis. Results All three study groups were well balanced with baseline age, gender, race and Sokal risk score. With minimum follow-up of 12 months, the proportions of patients receiving a study drug were 86.3% (69/79) in radotinib 300 mg bid group, 71.6% (58/81) in radotinib 400 mg bid group, and 81.5% (66/81) in imatinib 400 mg qd group. By 12 months, rates of MMR were significantly higher in patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid (51.9%, P = .0044) and radotinib 400 mg bid (45.7%, P = .0342) compared with imatinib (29.6%). The median time to MMR among responders were shorter on radotinib 300 mg bid (5.7 months) and radotinib 400 mg bid (5.6 months) than imatinib group (8.2 months). The MR4.5 rates by 12 months were also higher for both radotinib 300 mg bid (15.2%) and 400 mg bid (13.6%) compared to imatinib (8.6%). The CCyR rates by 12 months were also higher for radotinib 300 mg bid (91.1%, P = .0120) compared with imatinib (76.5%). There was no progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis in all groups by 12 months. Discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) or laboratory abnormalities occurred in 7 (8.8%), 16 (19.8%), and 5 (6.2%) patients for radotinib 300 mg bid, radotinib 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 16.5% of patients receiving radotinib 300 mg bid, in 13.6% for radotinib 400 mg bid, and in 19.8% receiving imatinib. And grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 19.0%, 23.5%, and 29.6% for radotinib 300 mg bid, 400 mg bid and imatinib, respectively. The most common any grade non-laboratory AEs were skin rash (35.4% and 33.3%), nausea/vomiting (22.8% and 23.5%), headache (19.0% and 30.9%), and pruritus (19.0% and 30.0%) in radotinib 300 mg bid and radotinib 400 mg bid, respectively; AEs in the imatinib group were edema (34.6%), myalgia (28.4%), nausea/vomiting (27.2%), and skin rash (22.2%). Overall, grade 3/4 non-laboratory AEs were uncommon in all groups. Conclusions With minimum 12 months follow-up, radotinib demonstrated significantly higher and faster rates of CCyR and MMR than imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP. The safety profiles of the radotinib and imatinib were different, and most AEs were manageable with optimal dose reduction. The results of this trial support that radotinib can be one of the standard of care in newly diagnosed CML-CP. Table. Baseline Characteristics, Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Rates Radotinib 300mg BID Radotinib 400mg BID Imatinib 400mg QD (N=79) (N=81) (N=81) Age, median (range), years 45 (20-75) 43 (18-84) 45 (18-83) Gender, n (%) Male 52 (65.8) 47 (58.0) 52 (64.2) Female 27 (34.2) 34 (42.0) 29 (35.8) Sokal risk, n (%) Low 21 (26.6) 22 (27.2) 22 (27.2) Intermediate 38 (48.1) 38 (46.9) 39 (48.2) High 20 (25.3) 21 (25.9) 20 (24.7) MMR by 12 months, % 51.9 45.7 29.6 P = .0044 P = .0342 Cumulative Incidence of MMR by 12 months¢Ó, % 57.0 58.0 35.0 P = .0040 P = .0037 MR4.5 by 12 months, % 15.2 13.6 8.6 CCyR by 12 months, % 91.1 81.5 76.5 ¢Ó Kaplan-Meier estimates of MMR Disclosures Kim: IL-YANG Pharm. Co. Ltd: Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Chung:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Choi:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document