Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study

Abstract Abstract 603 Parenteral azacitidine (AZA) is approved for administration on days 1–7 of a 28-day treatment schedule. Based on the short plasma half-life of AZA, S-phase restricted incorporation into DNA, and rapid re-methylation of DNA, it is possible that chronic daily exposure could enhanced its clinical activity. An oral formulation would be convenient and allow evaluation of lower doses administered on extended schedules. The initial phase I study of oral AZA, administered daily on a 7-day schedule demonstrated that it was bioavailable, safe, and clinically active in patients with MDS and AML (Garcia-Manero G, et al. Blood 2009;114:A117). Here, we report the results of a multicenter phase I exploration of extended oral AZA schedules, including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and preliminary response data. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with MDS, CMML or AML (not candidates for other therapies) were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were a hemoglobin level of ≤ 9.0 g/dL, and/or platelet count of ≤ 50 × 109/L, and/or be RBC transfusion-dependent; prior azanucleoside therapy was not permitted. Patients received oral AZA daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) on 14- or 21-days schedules, with starting at a dose of 300 mg for QD dosing and 200 mg for BID dosing. Patients were enrolled into cohorts of 6 and evaluated for DLTs at the end of Cycle 1. Patients were monitored continuously for adverse events (AEs) and assessed for disease response at the end of every second cycle. During Cycle 1, on the first and last day of treatment, PK parameters were derived from AZA concentrations in the plasma after the first dose of the day. PD samples were collected during the first 2 cycles and DNA methylation changes were evaluated using a LINE-1 assay. To date, 25 patients (median age 68 years [range 44–87]; 14 male and 11 female) with MDS (n = 13), AML (n = 7 de novo and n = 3 transformed), and CMML (n = 2) have received oral AZA on extended treatment schedules. Two DLTs, grade 3 nausea and grade 3 vomiting, occurred in 1 of 6 DLT-evaluable patients treated at 14-days QD (n = 7). No DLTs were observed on the 21-day QD (n = 6) or 14-day BID (n = 6) schedules; safety evaluation for the 21-day BID schedule is ongoing (n = 6). The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached on these schedules; no patient has received > 300 mg per dose. Overall rates of all grades nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal pain with the extended schedules were similar to those observed with the oral 7-day schedule. The rate of febrile neutropenia (all grades) was higher in the 21-day QD cohort. This was observed in 4 patients with baseline ANC < 500 and/or AML diagnosis. Most common grade 3/4 AEs in the QD schedules were febrile neutropenia (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 4/6), anemia (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 0/6), thrombocytopenia (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 1/6), diarrhea (14-day, 0/7; 21-day, 1/6), nausea (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 0/6), and vomiting (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 0/6). Extended BID schedules are under evaluation. PK data have been generated for 19 of 25 patients. For the 300 mg 14-day QD, 300 mg 21-day QD, and 200 mg 14-day BID schedules, using mean AUC (first and last day) results, extrapolated cumulative exposures per cycle were ~28%, 42% and 26%, respectively, compared with historical exposure observed following subcutaneous administration. AZA exposure increased with increasing dose, but was not dose-proportional. Clinical responses were observed for MDS/CMML patients on both extended QD schedules, with assessment ongoing for BID schedules (Table). In summary, extended (14- and 21-day) dosing of oral AZA is generally well tolerated, with no AZA accumulation, and promising clinical responses were observed, including complete remission (CR), marrow CR (mCR), and hematologic improvement (HI). Table. Parameter, n (%) Oral AZA Treatment Schedule MDS/CMML Responders/Evaluable patients, (%) 14-day QD 21-day QD Overall response* (CR, mCR, any HI) 5/6 (83) 3/3 (100) CR 0/6 2/3 (67) mCR 0/6 3/3 (100) HI 5/6 (83) 3/3 (100) HI-erythroid 3/5 (60) 1/1 (100) HI-platelet† 2/5 (40) 3/3 (100) HI-neutrophil 0/1 0/1 Transfusion independence 3/4 (75) 1/2 (50) RBC 1/2 (50) 1/1 (100) Platelet 2/2 (100) 0/1 * International Working Group 2006 criteria, patients only counted once for overall response, but may be counted more than once in individual response categories. † Includes patients achieving partial (≥ 50%) or complete platelet transfusion independence. Disclosures: Gore: Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Cogle:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ward:Celgene: Equity Ownership. MacBeth:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Laille:Celgene: Employment. Giordano:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Celgene: Research Funding. Skikne:Celgene: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Excellent Tolerability and Promising Activity In a Heavily Pretreated Population

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1951.1951 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1951-1951 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

Donna Weber ◽

Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

The Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) Is Active and Tolerated in Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.156.156 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 156-156 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Nathan H Fowler ◽

Ranjana H Advani ◽

Jeff Sharman ◽

Sonali M. Smith ◽

Jesse McGreivy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

B Cell ◽

Median Time ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Study Drug ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Phase Ii Studies ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 156 Background Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a central mediator of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling and is essential for normal B-cell development. Subtypes of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) may be dependent on chronic activation of the BCR pathway and primary follicular lymphoma (FL) cells have been found to maintain enhanced signaling when compared to normal B-cells (Irish JM, et al. Blood 2006; 108: 3135). Ibrutinib is an orally administered, covalently-bound inhibitor of BTK which induces apoptosis and inhibits cellular migration and adhesion in malignant B-cells. Based on promising preclinical data in B-cell malignancies, a phase I study was conducted to test the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ibrutinib in relapsed NHL. We report the long-term tolerability and sustained activity of ibrutinib in FL patients in this study with extended follow-up. Methods Adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma were eligible for trial entry and 16 patients with FL were enrolled in this Phase I study. Ibrutinib was administered orally with dose escalation according to protocol-defined dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) to define a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or until 3 dose levels above attainment of full BTK occupancy. A 28-day on/7-day off (intermittent) schedule was evaluated in 5 cohorts (1.25–12.5 mg/kg PO qd) and a once daily oral dose (without a drug holiday) in 2 cohorts (8.3 mg/kg and 560-mg fixed dose). Patients were evaluable for safety if they received study drug. Efficacy was evaluated in all patients who received 2.5 mg/kg or higher (which achieves full BTK occupancy) and had one on-study imaging assessment. Efficacy was also analyzed at higher doses to determine if there was improved efficacy. Responses were assessed every 2 months using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results Median age 60 (41–71), equal numbers of males and females, median time from diagnosis 54 months (19–186), median number of prior therapies 3 (1–5) including: stem cell transplantation (6%), alkylators (88%), anthracyclines (56%), nucleoside analogs (19%), and rituximab (100%). FLIPI scores at baseline: low risk = 19%, intermediate risk = 37%, high risk = 44%. Treatment-emergent AEs occurring in ≥ 25% included: diarrhea (50%), fatigue (44%), nausea (38%), cough (31%) and myalgia (25%). Observed grade 3 AEs included: anemia, anxiety, hypersensitivity, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, decreased neutrophil count, non-cardiac chest pain, pancytopenia, pneumonia and vomiting (one event each). A Grade 4 hypokalemia occurred and was considered to be related to study drug by the investigator. One case of myelodysplastic syndrome occurred 29 days after the last dose of ibrutinib in a patient with pre-existing anemia and multiple lines of prior treatment and was considered to be unrelated by the investigator. One patient in the 2.5 mg/kg/day intermittent cohort experienced DLTs of grade 2 neutropenia resulting in the ibrutinib dose being held > 7 days and a grade 4 hypokalemia. One patient in the 8.3 mg/kg/day intermittent cohort experienced a Grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction. No DLTs were observed in the 12.5 mg/kg/day cohort and the MTD was not reached. In the 16 patients with FL, 11 patients received ibrutinib at 2.5 mg/kg or higher and were evaluable for efficacy (2 patients at 2.5 mg/kg, 1 at 5 mg/kg, 3 at 8.3 mg/kg intermittent, 3 at 12.5 mg/kg, 2 at 8.3 mg/kg continuous dosing). Median time on ibrutinib was 7 months (0–29). Overall response rate (ORR) 54.5% (3 CRs, 3 PRs), duration of response (DOR) 12.3 months, median PFS 13.4 months. In the 9 patients who received ibrutinib at 5 mg/kg or higher, the median time on ibrutinib, ORR and DOR were similar to the efficacy in the 11 patients. However, there was a slight trend toward improved PFS of 19.6 months; 2 patients are still responding to ibrutinib at 25 and 29 months. Conclusions The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (PCI-32765) is well tolerated and active in patients with relapsed FL. Based upon drug occupancy and clinical responses, a dose of 5 mg/kg/day or above is recommended for phase II studies. Extended dosing did not appear to increase toxicity and response rates improved with continued treatment in some patients. Phase II studies with ibrutinib in FL are planned. Disclosures: Advani: Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Sharman:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Calistoga: Honoraria; Portola pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. McGreivy:pharmacyclics: Employment. Kunkel:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Troung:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhou:Pharmacyclics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of PRO131921, a Novel Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CD20+ Indolent NHL: Correlation Between Clinical Responses and AUC Pharmacokinetics.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3742.3742 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3742-3742 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Jonathan W. Friedberg ◽

Julie M. Vose ◽

Brad S Kahl ◽

Mark W. Brunvand ◽

Andre Goy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Phase I ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Drug Exposure ◽

Single Agent ◽

Dose Cohort ◽

Clinical Responses ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Anti Cd20

Abstract Abstract 3742 Poster Board III-678 PRO131921 is a third-generation, humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody engineered to have significantly increased antibody-dependent cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity compared to rituximab as shown in in vitro models. In preclinical in vivo lymphoma models, PRO131921 has superior anti-tumor efficacy compared to rituximab. In this Phase I study, PRO131921 was administered as a single agent to patients (pts) with CD20+, relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who had been treated with a prior rituximab-containing regimen. The aim of the study was to determine the safety and tolerability of PRO131921, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), its pharmacokinetics (PK), and to establish a Phase II dose. Pts were treated with PRO131921 by intravenous infusion (premedication with acetaminophen and anti-histamine) weekly for 4 weeks on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. The dose of the first infusion was approximately 50% that of subsequent infusions. The dose was escalated based on safety in a 3+3 design. PK samples were obtained pre- and post-infusion on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, and once each on days 2, 23, 29, 50, and 78 (and at later time points for up to a year). Twenty-four pts were treated with PRO131921 at doses from 25 mg/m2 to 800 mg/m2. Median age was 58 yrs (38-78). Histologies were follicular NHL (n=20), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=3) or marginal zone NHL (n=1). Pts had received a median of 2 (range 1-6) prior regimens. PRO131921 was generally well-tolerated and no MTD was reached in the study. The most common adverse events were Grade 1 or 2 (CTCAE V3.0) chills, flushing, itching, fatigue, fever, nausea, dizziness, diarrhea, and hypotension, most of which were part of infusion-related reactions limited in general to the first infusion. These responded well to slowing or interruption of the infusion, and symptomatic treatment (including steroids). Grade 3 AEs (related and unrelated to study drug) included 3 episodes each of transient neutropenia and hypoxia, and single episodes of throat tightness, bronchospasm, syncope, fatigue, periarthritis, pneumonia, and deep venous thrombosis. There was 1 unrelated Grade 4 pulmonary embolism. Two pts did not receive all 4 doses of therapy due to DLTs. One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in the 200/400 mg/m2 dose cohort due to a significant infusion reaction, and a second was observed at the 300/800 mg/m2 dose cohort due to Grade 3 joint pain and fatigue after 2 infusions. Detailed PK studies of PRO131921 in all patients were broadly similar to rituximab with a dose-dependent increase in exposure, but with significant inter- and intra-patient variability. Analysis of PK data demonstrated a correlation between higher normalized drug exposure (normalized AUC) and both tumor shrinkage (p=0.049) and clinical response (p=0.034), consistent with the hypothesis that rapid drug clearance (e.g. by tumor in excess of drug) may result in decreased clinical efficacy. Best investigator-assessed responses to treatment in the 22 evaluable pts by day 78 or later were 6 PR, 13 SD, and 3 PD; 5/10 pts in the two highest dose cohorts responded. In conclusion, PRO131921 has shown clinical activity in rituximab-relapsed and refractory indolent NHL pts. The observation that higher normalized AUC may be associated with improved clinical responses has potential implications in future trials of monoclonal antibody-based therapies, and emphasizes the importance of early PK studies to optimize antibody efficacy. Disclosures: Friedberg: Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vose:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kahl:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Brunvand:Genentech, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Goy:Genentech/Biogen IDEC: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kasamon:Genentech/Biogen IDEC: Research Funding. Burington:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Li:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Ho:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Cheson:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Dose-Ranging Study of Oral Ezatiostat Hydrochloride (Telintra®, TLK199) in Combination with Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) in Patients with Non-Deletion(5q) Low to Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2778.2778 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2778-2778

Author(s):

Azra Raza ◽

Naomi Galili ◽

Deborah Mulford ◽

Scott E. Smith ◽

Gail Brown ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Platelet Transfusion ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Off Label ◽

Transfusion Independence ◽

Dose Ranging ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Abstract 2778 Introduction: Lenalidomide is approved for the treatment of del(5q) MDS in US and Japan. In Low to Intermediate-1 (Int-1) risk non-del(5q) MDS, lenalidomide treatment is less effective with a lower response rate (25%) and shorter response duration [Raza A. et al, Blood, 2008.111,1]. Ezatiostat, a glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GST P1-1) inhibitor, activates Jun kinase, promoting the growth and maturation of hematopoietic progenitors while inducing apoptosis in malignant cells. Based on the novel mechanism of action, response rates, non-overlapping toxicities, and tolerability observed in a single agent ezatiostat Phase 2 study in MDS, a study of the combination of ezatiostat and lenalidomide was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of ezatiostat with lenalidomide in non-del(5q) Low to Int-1 risk MDS. Methods: In this multicenter Phase 1 dose-ranging study, ezatiostat was given at a starting dose of 2000 mg in combination with lenalidomide at 10 mg, days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle. In stage 1, 3–6 patients in a standard 3+3 design were treated before escalation to the ezatiostat/lenalidomide 2500/10 mg dose level. Treatment was given until lack of MDS response or unacceptable toxicity. Hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) rates were determined by the MDS International Working Group (IWG; 2006) criteria. Results: Eighteen pts (median age 73 yrs; range 57–82; 72% male), with World Health Organization classifications: 4 refractory anemia (RA), 2 RA with excess blasts-1, 4 refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (RCMD), 5 RCMD with ring sideroblasts, 2 MDS-unclassified, 1 MDS/myeloproliferative disorder-U were enrolled. Thirteen pts (72%) were Int-1 risk, 5 (28%) Low risk; 4 pts (22%) had abnormal cytogenetics. Twelve RBC transfusion-dependent pts (67%) required a median of 6 units (range 4–10)/8-weeks. Two pts (11%) were platelet transfusion dependent. A total of 67 treatment cycles were given (median 3.5 cycles/pt [range 1–11]) and only 6 cycles (9%) required dose reductions and 8 (12%) dose delays. Two of 6 pts reported DLTs (Grade 3 diarrhea and Grade 3 rash) at 2500/10 mg, with 9 additional pts receiving the recommended combination dose of 2000/10 mg. Eleven of 18 pts were evaluable (4 at 2500/10 mg and 7 at 2000/10 mg), and 3 pts are still on therapy with insufficient treatment duration to be evaluable. The HI-E rate was 43% (3/7; 95% CI, 10%–82%) for pts at the recommended 2000/10 mg dose and 6 pts are continuing therapy at the time of analysis. Three of 8 (38%; 95% CI, 9%–76%) RBC transfusion-dependent evaluable pts achieved transfusion independence including 1 responder who did not respond to prior lenalidomide. In responders, the median increase in hemoglobin level was 3.4 g/dL (from 7.9 g/dL). In 2 of 4 thrombocytopenic pts, a HI-platelet (HI-P) response was observed. A bilineage (HI-E and HI-P) response in 2 of 4 pts with anemia and thrombocytopenia was reported. One RBC and platelet transfusion-dependent pt who had a poor response to prior anti-thymocyte globulin treatment achieved complete RBC and platelet transfusion independence. The combination was generally well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. Most common treatment-related non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were Grades 1 and 2 including: fatigue (6%, 28%), swelling (0%, 11%), anorexia (11%, 6%), rash (0%, 6%), skin odor (11%, 6%), nausea (39%, 11%), diarrhea (22%,17%), vomiting (28%,17%), upper abdominal pain (5.6%, 5.6%), and constipation (11%, 0%). Grade 3 events were rash (11%), nausea (6%), diarrhea (17%), and vomiting (6%). Most common hematologic-related AEs were Grades 1 and 2 thrombocytopenia (11%, 6%) and neutropenia (0%, 11%). Grade 3–4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (11%, 17%), neutropenia (17%, 11%), anemia (6%, 6%), and febrile neutropenia (11%, 0%). Conclusions: Ezatiostat is the first GST P1-1 inhibitor to cause clinically significant reductions in RBC and platelet transfusions, including RBC and platelet transfusion independence. Since ezatiostat is non-myelosuppressive, it is a good candidate for combination with lenalidomide and in this study, the combination was well tolerated. Interestingly, ezatiostat may also have the potential to enhance lenalidomide's efficacy. The recommended doses of this combination regimen for future studies is the ezatiostat/lenalidomide 2000/10 mg. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Lenalidomide was used off-label in patients with non-del5q MDS. Mulford:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Brown:Telik, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Meng:Telik, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lyons:Incyte: Research Funding; Telik: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mesa:NS Pharma: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; SBio: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Imetelstat Treatment Leads to Durable Transfusion Independence (TI) in RBC Transfusion-Dependent (TD), Non-Del(5q) Lower Risk MDS Relapsed/Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Who Are Lenalidomide (LEN) and HMA Naive

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114877 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 463-463 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

David P. Steensma ◽

Uwe Platzbecker ◽

Koen Van Eygen ◽

Azra Raza ◽

Valeria Santini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Transfusion Independence ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract BACKGROUND: Patients with TD lower-risk (LR)-MDS relapsed or refractory to ESA have limited treatment options. Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor that targets cells with short telomere lengths and active telomerase, characteristics observed in some MDS patients. IMerge is an ongoing global study of imetelstat in RBC TD patients with LR-MDS (IPSS Low or Int-1). In the first 32 patients enrolled, 8-week TI rate was 34%, with 24-week TI of 16%, and HI-E of 59%. The most frequently reported adverse events were reversible grade ≥3 cytopenias (Fenaux et al EHA 2018 Abstr S1157). Higher response rates were observed in patients (n=13) who were LEN and HMA naïve without del(5q). We report here results in an additional 25 LEN and HMA naïve patients without del(5q), with longer term follow-up of the 13 initial patients meeting the same criteria. METHODS: IMerge is a phase 2/3 trial (NCT02598661) that includes LR-MDS patients with a high transfusion burden (≥4 units / 8 weeks) who are relapsed/refractory to ESA or have sEPO >500 mU/mL. The additional 25 were required to be LEN and HMA naïve and lack del(5q). Imetelstat 7.5 mg/kg was administered IV every 4 weeks. In addition to the key endpoints noted above, secondary endpoints include safety, time to and duration of TI. Biomarkers are also being explored, including telomerase activity, hTERT, telomere length, and genetic mutations. RESULTS: Overall, for the 38 LEN/HMA naïve and non-del(5q) patients, median age was 71.5 years and 66% were men. 63% of patients were IPSS Low and 37% Int-1. Median prior RBC transfusion burden was 8.0 (range 4-14) U, and 71% had WHO 2008 RARS or RCMD-RS. 9/37 (24%) patients with evaluable sEPO levels had baseline level >500 mU/mL. As of July 2018, with a median follow-up of 25.8 months for the initial 13 patients, and 5.2 months for the 25 recently included patients, the 8-week RBC-TI rate was 37% (14/38). Durability of 24-week TI responses was demonstrated, with a median duration of 10 months and the longest ongoing response now >2 years. Among the patients achieving durable TI, all showed a Hb rise of ≥3.0 g/dL compared to baseline during the transfusion-free interval. Response rates were similar in RARS/RCMD-RS (33% [9/27]) and other patients (27% [3/11]), and those with baseline EPO levels >500 mU/mL (33% [3/9]) and ≤500 mU/mL (32% [9/28]). Reversible grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were each reported in 58% of the patients. Liver function test (LFT) elevations were mostly grade 1/2. Reversible grade 3 LFTelevations were observed in 3 (8%) patients on study. An independent Hepatic Review Committee deemed the observed LFT elevations were not imetelstat-related hepatic toxicities. SUMMARY / CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of 38 non-del(5q) LR-MDS patients with a high RBC transfusion burden who were ESA relapsed/refractory and naïve to LEN/HMA, single-agent imetelstat yielded a TI rate of 37%, with a median duration of 10 months and limited side effects. Durable responses were characterized by transfusion independence >24 weeks and accompanied by Hb rise. Updated data will be presented. Disclosures Steensma: Takeda: Consultancy; Syros: Research Funding; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onconova: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; H3 Biosciences: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amphivena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acceleron: Consultancy. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Van Eygen:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Raza:Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Geoptix: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding; Syros: Research Funding. Santini:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Germing:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Font:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Samarina:Janssen: Research Funding. Díez-Campelo:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bussolari:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sherman:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sun:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Varsos:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rose:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Roche: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Changing the Natural History of Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group-A with Gene Therapy: Early Results of U.S. Phase I Study of Lentiviral-Mediated Ex-VivoFANCA Gene Insertion in Human Stem and Progenitor Cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127352 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3350-3350

Author(s):

Agnieszka Czechowicz ◽

Maria Grazia Roncarolo ◽

Brian C Beard ◽

Ken Law ◽

Eileen Nicoletti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Phase I ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Early Evidence ◽

Stem And Progenitor Cells ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: Fanconi anemia (FA) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by defective cellular deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair, associated with developmental abnormalities, progressive bone marrow failure (BMF), and a predisposition to hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. 80% of FA patients develop BMF. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment for BMF, its utilization and efficacy is limited by availability of suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donors, risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and transplant-related toxicities. Ex-vivo insertion of a functional FANCA gene into autologous FA-A CD34+ enriched hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) has been shown in preclinical studies to provide a survival advantage to the gene-modified stem cells, leading to correction of BMF. Feasibility of this approach was established in the FANCOLEN-1 clinical trial (Spain), although cell doses and transduction levels varied considerably. Modifications to the collection and manufacturing processes were made in the clinical studies to enhance the dose of transduced HSPCs, with the goal of preventing progression of BMF to obviate the need of an allo-HSCT. Design and Methods: RP-L102-0418 (clinicaltrials.gov # NCT03814408) is a U.S. Phase I clinical trial evaluating the feasibility and safety of autologous CD34+ cells transduced with a lentiviral vector (LV) carrying the FANCA gene (PGK-FANCA-WPRE) in two pediatric patients with FA-A. Patients <12 years of age, with early evidence of cytopenias, but with bone marrow (BM) CD34+ count >30/µL were eligible for treatment. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected via leucocytapheresis on two consecutive days after mobilization with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and Plerixafor (Mozobil). CD34+ HSPCs were enriched, placed in culture with cytokines, and transduced with PGK-FANCA-WPRE LV. The investigational drug product (DP) (RP-L102) was infused fresh into patients within 4 hours of release, without any prior conditioning regimen. Patients are being followed for 3 years post-infusion for safety assessments (replication competent lentivirus (RCL), insertion site analysis (ISA)) and to ascertain early evidence of efficacy (increasing peripheral blood vector copy number (VCN) and BM mitomycin-C (MMC) resistance), along with stabilization/correction of cytopenias. Results: Two FA-A patients (aged 5 and 6 years) were consented and enrolled on the study at Stanford University. Mobilization and apheresis procedures were performed successfully without any serious adverse events. DP was successfully manufactured using "Process B" optimization including transduction enhancers, commercial-grade vector, and modified cell processing. Because of higher transduced CD34+ and colony forming cell (CFC) doses, we anticipate early development of BM MMC resistance in the current study patients. Safety and efficacy data 4 to 6 months post-treatment, including peripheral blood VCN, blood counts and bone marrow MMC resistance, will be available at the time of presentation. Conclusions: DP has been successfully manufactured in the Phase I study (N=2) to meet the required specifications.Patients are being monitored for early efficacy assessments; 6+ months of follow-up may be required to observe the proliferative advantage of transduced HSPCs.Plans for Phase II portion of the study are in progress. Disclosures Czechowicz: Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Beard:Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Law:Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nicoletti:Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Río:Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Bueren:Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Inventor on patents on lentiviral vectors filled by CIEMAT, CIBERER and F.J.D and may be entitled to receive financial benefits from the licensing of such patents, Research Funding. Schwartz:Rocket Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Safety, Clinical Activity, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics from a Phase I Study of PF-06863135, a B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121805 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1869-1869 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Noopur S. Raje ◽

Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽

Cristina Gasparetto ◽

Robert F. Cornell ◽

Heike I. Krupka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Best Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Dose Levels

Introduction: PF-06863135 (PF-3135) is a bispecific, humanized, monoclonal antibody (mAb) consisting of BCMA- and CD3-targeting arms paired on an IgG2a backbone by hinge-mutation technology. PF-3135 binds BCMA+ myeloma cells and CD3+ T cells with affinities of 20 pM and ~40 nM, respectively (Panowski et al. Blood 2016). We report here findings from the dose-escalation portion of an ongoing, multi-center, open-label, phase I study (NCT03269136) of PF-3135 in patients with RRMM. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with RRMM, previously treated with a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 mAb, received escalating, intravenous (IV) doses of PF-3135, once weekly. Prior BCMA-targeted bispecific T-cell engager or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) treatment was allowed by protocol. Patients had measurable disease per the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updated criteria 2014. A modified toxicity probability interval method (mTPI), targeting a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 25% (equivalence interval ± 5%) was used for dose escalation. The primary study objectives are to assess PF-3135 safety and tolerability, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and select the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives include evaluation of anti-myeloma activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of PF-3135. Results: As of April 9, 2019, 17 patients had received once weekly, non-continuous, IV infusion of PF-3135 in 6 dose-escalation groups. The majority were men (71%). The median age was 61 yrs (range, 47-82 yrs) and median disease duration since onset was 7 yrs (range, 1.1-13.3 yrs). Ten (59%) patients had ≥1 chromosomal abnormality and 5 (29%) had a normal karyotype (status not known for 2 [12%] patients). The median number of prior anti-myeloma therapies was 11; 5 (29%) patients had received prior BCMA-targeted therapy. Eight (47%) patients had relapsed MM and 8 (47%) had refractory disease (recurrence type not known for 1 [6%] patient). Ten (59%) patients experienced treatment-related (TR) AEs of any grade. Most TRAEs were grade 1-2, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS, 24%), thrombocytopenia (24%), anemia (18%), and pyrexia (18%). Three (18%) patients had grade 3 TRAEs (increased alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and lymphopenia). One patient treated at the highest dose level, who had received prior BCMA CART therapy, developed treatment-related febrile neutropenia, a DLT, which may have been related to CRS and borderline/low neutrophil count at baseline. None of the patients had grade 4-5 TRAEs or discontinued treatment due to a TRAE. The median duration of treatment was 4 (range, 2-12) actual dosing days. Sixteen of the 17 patients were evaluable for response. At the time of data cut-off, one (6%) patient had a minimal response and 6 (35%) patients had stable disease (SD) across dose levels, as best response by investigator IMWG assessment; 9 (53%) patients experienced disease progression. The clinical benefit rate (defined as best response ≥SD) was 41% (95% CI: 18.4%, 67.1%). Conclusions: Treatment with IV PF-3135 was well tolerated at the dose levels evaluated. The observed CRS events were moderate and dose-dependent. Additional dose cohorts are accruing. The latest clinical, biomarker, and PK data will be presented for this ongoing study. Disclosures Raje: Medscape: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkyLineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KaryoPharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gasparetto:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed . Cornell:KaryoPharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Krupka:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Navarro:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forgie:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Udata:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Basu:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chou:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leung:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: PF-06863135, investigational agent

Download Full-text

An Open-Label, Phase I Study of R-CVP in Combination with Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CD22-Positive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma,

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.3715.3715 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 3715-3715 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Michinori Ogura ◽

Toshiki Uchida ◽

David A MacDonald ◽

Kiyohiko Hatake ◽

Andrew Davies ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Complete Response ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Efficacy Data ◽

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Expansion Cohort

Abstract Abstract 3715 Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, a potent antitumor antibiotic. CD22 is expressed on the majority of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). Although safety and preliminary efficacy data of INO as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab have previously been reported, there is no report of combination use of INO with chemotherapy. This phase I study evaluated the safety of INO in combination with chemotherapy (R-CVP regimen) in patients with relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL. Preliminary efficacy data were also collected. Patients and Methods: Patients with either relapsed or refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL and at least 1 prior treatment regimen, including rituximab and chemotherapy, were enrolled in a phase I dose-finding study (part 1), with a planned expansion cohort (n = 10) to confirm the safety and tolerability of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; part 2), and a further expansion cohort (n = 20) to estimate antitumor activity (part 3). In the dose-escalation study, INO (0.8 mg/m2) was given on Day 2 with R-CVP (rituximab 375 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, and escalating doses of cyclophosphamide 375, 550, and 750 mg/m2 all on Day 1; prednisone 40 mg/m2 on Days 1–5) q3wks. After the highest dose of cyclophosphamide was evaluated for safety, INO was escalated to 1.3 mg/m2. Dose reductions and/or dose delays were performed, as needed, based on toxicities. The current analysis presents the completed dose-escalation phase, with preliminary safety and efficacy data. Results: 23 patients with follicular (FL; n = 15), mantle cell (n = 3), diffuse large B-cell (n = 3), or small lymphocytic (n = 1) lymphomas (missing diagnosis, n = 1) have been enrolled so far: 65% of patients were male, and the median age was 62 years (range, 42–74 years). In part 1 of the study, approximately 50% of patients had received 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens, and all had received prior rituximab. As of the time of this analysis, 11 patients had completed at least 5 treatment cycles (ie, ≥105 days on study drug). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported with INO 0.8 mg/m2 plus R-CVP at the lower doses of cyclophosphamide (375 and 550 mg/m2). At a dose level of INO 0.8 mg/m2 plus full-dose R-CVP (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2), 1 out of 6 patients had a DLT of grade 4 neutropenia requiring treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). At a dose level of INO 1.3 mg/m2 plus R-CVP, 2 out of 3 patients had a total of 3 DLTs (acute hepatitis, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia requiring G-CSF). Therefore, the MTD was determined to be rituximab 375 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 all given on Day 1, INO 0.8 mg/m2 given on Day 2, and prednisone 40 mg/m2 given on Days 1 through 5 of each 3-week cycle. Treatment-emergent grade ≥3 adverse events included neutropenia (57%), lymphopenia (52%), leukopenia (35%), thrombocytopenia (30%), increased alanine aminotransferase (9%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (4%), decreased blood sodium (4%), fatigue (4%), febrile neutropenia (4%), hyperbilirubinemia (4%), hypoxia (4%), lethargy (4%), pleural effusion (4%), and pollakiuria (4%). Enrollment is continuing in parts 2 and 3 of the study. Preliminary efficacy data from the escalation portion of the study (n = 15 evaluable patients) is notable for an overall response rate (ORR) of 87% (33% with complete response; 53% with partial response). In patients with FL, the ORR was 100% (45% with complete response). Conclusions: INO 0.8 mg/m2 appears to be tolerable when given in combination with full dose R-CVP chemotherapy. DLTs were hematologic and hepatic, and encouraging signs of antitumor activity have been reported. Disclosures: MacDonald: Roche Canada: Honoraria, Research Funding. Davies:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Sangha:Roche: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria. Crump:Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Ortho: Consultancy, Honoraria. Thieblemont:Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris: Employment; Institut National du Cancer - INCa [French National Cancer Institute]: Research Funding. Ishibashi:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hua:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paccagnella:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Vandendries:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kobayashi:Ohtsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Nippon Shiyaku: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Tobinai:Bayer: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Symbio: Research Funding; Zenyaku: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) Administered in Extended Treatment Schedules to Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.424.424 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 424-424 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

Steven D. Gore ◽

Suman Kambhampati ◽

Bart L Scott ◽

Ayalew Tefferi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Once Daily ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

Dosing Regimens ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 424 Background: Azacitidine for injection has been shown to prolong overall survival in patients (pts) with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) compared with conventional care regimens (CCR) (Lancet Oncol, 2009). An oral formulation of azacitidine (CC-486) is in development. Oral azacitidine may maximize convenience, eliminate injection-site reactions, and if administered in extended dosing schedules, may enhance and prolong the therapeutic effects of azacitidine. Oral azacitidine administered once-daily (QD) for 7 days (d) of repeated 28d cycles has been shown to be bioavailable, biologically and clinically active, and well-tolerated in pts with MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (Garcia-Manero, J Clin Oncol, 2011). Preliminary evidence suggests that extending oral azacitidine dosing to 14d or 21d of the 28d cycle may enhance pharmacodynamic and epigenetic activity (Laille, Leuk Res, 2011). Purpose: To evaluate hematologic response and safety associated with extended dosing regimens of oral azacitidine in pts with lower-risk MDS. Methods: This ongoing, multicenter, phase 1 study, enrolled pts with lower-risk (IPSS Low or INT-1) MDS who were RBC transfusion dependent (TD) and/or thrombocytopenic (average platelet count ≤50,000 within 56d prior to the first dose) at baseline. Pts were sequentially assigned to receive oral azacitidine 300mg QD for either 14d or 21d of repeated 28d cycles. Hematologic assessments were made every 2 weeks. Hematologic response was assessed using IWG 2006 criteria (Cheson, Blood, 2006). Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 3.0. Results: At data cut-off (May 18, 2012), 53 pts with lower-risk MDS had enrolled (300mg oral azacitidine QDx14d, n=26; QDx21d, n=27). Demographic and disease characteristics at baseline were similar in the 14d and 21d treatment cohorts (Table 1). Median (range) hematology counts at baseline were Hgb 8.7 g/L (6.0–13.0), ANC 1.6×109/L (0–30.3), and platelets 56.0×109/L (6.0–564.0). At study entry, 40% of pts had received no prior MDS treatment (except transfusions), 45% had received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and 15% had received WBC growth factors. The number of oral azacitidine treatment cycles received ranged from 1 to 12 (median numbers of oral azacitidine cycles were 6 in the QDx14d and 4 in the QDx21d cohorts). Four pts in the 21d cohort and 1 pt in the 14d cohort received reduced oral azacitidine doses (200mg QD). Overall, 10 pts discontinued the study, including 6 pts (3 pts in each cohort) who discontinued due to AEs that may have been treatment-related (gastrointestinal [n=2] or intracranial [n=1] hemorrhage, febrile neutropenia [n=1], pneumonia [n=1], thrombocytopenia [n=1]). Overall response rates (ORR), which included complete (CR) and partial remission (PR), any hematologic improvement (HI), and transfusion independence (TI), ranged from 38.5% in the QDx14d cohort to 29.6% in the QDx21d cohort, and RBC TI was achieved by 47% and 33%, respectively, of pts who were RBC TD at baseline (Table 2). For pts who received at least 4 cycles of oral azacitidine (14d, n=19; 21d, n=14), ORR was 47.4% in the 14d and 50.0% in the 21d cohorts, and RBC TI rates in RBC TD pts (n=16) were 67% in the 14d and 57% in the 21d cohorts. The most frequent (≥5%) grade 3/4 hematologic AEs in the QDx14d cohort were anemia (11.5%), thrombocytopenia (11.5%), and neutropenia (7.7%); and in the QDx21d cohort were neutropenia (14.8%), anemia (7.4%), and febrile neutropenia (7.4%). Most frequent grade 3/4 non-hematologic AEs were gastrointestinal, including vomiting (7.7%) in the QDx14d cohort, and diarrhea (11.1%) and vomiting (7.4%) in the QDx21d cohort. Conclusions: Oral azacitidine 300mg QD administered in extended dosing schedules of 14d or 21d of repeated 28d cycles was effective and well-tolerated in these pts with lower-risk MDS. Beside hematologic AEs, the most frequently observed AEs with oral azacitidine were gastrointestinal and were manageable. Efficacy and safety outcomes with 300mg QD oral azacitidine were generally comparable between the 14d and 21d extended dosing regimens. Based on these data, oral azacitidine administered once-daily in extended dosing schedules is active and well-tolerated and warrants further investigation in randomized, controlled trials. Disclosures: Garcia-Manero: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gore:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Scott:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hetzer:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kumar:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of AZD1152 In Combination with Low Dose Cytosine Arabinoside In Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.656.656 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 656-656 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Vincent Ribrag ◽

Philippe Rousselot ◽

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cytosine Arabinoside ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 656 Background: Aurora B kinase is a key mitosis regulator that is overexpressed in a range of malignancies, including AML. AZD1152 is a potent selective inhibitor of Aurora B kinase. This ascending dose cohort study was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of AZD1152 in combination with low dose cytosine arabinoside (LDAC), the only agent that has currently demonstrated a survival advantage over palliative care in older patients with AML. Methods: Patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML unfit for intensive induction chemotherapy were included. Cohorts of 6 patients received escalating doses of a 7-day continuous iv infusion of AZD1152, at doses of 800 mg up to the monotherapy maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 1200 mg, in combination with LDAC 20 mg sc injection twice daily for 10 days. AZD1152 and LDAC were administered in 28-day cycles. If 1 or fewer dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in a cohort, AZD1152 dose was escalated. A DLT was an adverse event (AE) or laboratory abnormality considered related to AZD1152, which was a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥3 non-hematological toxicity (despite adequate supportive care). If 2 or more of 6 patients had a DLT, the dose was reduced or enrollment was stopped into that cohort. The MTD was defined as the dose at which 0 or 1 of 6 patients experienced a DLT. Following determination, the MTD cohort was expanded to 12 patients. Objective response was evaluated by the investigators using AML International Working Group clinical response criteria. AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) were evaluated according to CTCAE version 3. Blood samples were taken pre-dose and at selected times post dose for 3 cycles to determine levels of AZD1152, its active metabolite AZD1152 hQPA and LDAC. Results: At the data cut-off on 02/08/10 (data validation ongoing), 22 patients had been treated with the combination of LDAC plus AZD1152 (n=6 800 mg; n=13 1000 mg; n=3 1200 mg). Mean age (range) across the 3 cohorts was 71.1 (61–82) years, 14 (64%) were male, 21 were Caucasian and 1 was African American. The mean age of the 800 mg cohort was older (75.2 years) compared with the 1000 mg and 1200 mg cohorts (70.3 and 67.3 years, respectively). At baseline, 8 (36%) patients had de novo AML, and 7 (32%), 2 (9%) and 1 (5%) had AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome, myeloproliferative disorder and chemotherapy, respectively. All 22 patients had newly diagnosed AML. All patients received at least 1 cycle of treatment, 10 received ≥2 cycles and 1 received 5 cycles. One patient received an AZD1152 dose reduction (1000 mg to 800 mg) for their second cycle due to a high creatinine level, which was present at pre-dosing. Two patients in the 1200 mg group had DLT episodes of CTCAE grade 3 mucositis. The MTD of AZD1152 in combination with LDAC was defined as 1000 mg. All patients had at least 1 AE, the most common were myelosuppression (febrile neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia in 50%, 36% and 27% of patients, respectively), stomatitis/mucosal inflammation, nausea, diarrhea and infection (each in 45% of patients). The most common grade 3/4 CTCAEs were febrile neutropenia, infection, thrombocytopenia and anemia. There were 3 (13.6%) deaths, 1 in each cohort; 2 were due to SAEs of febrile neutropenia (multiple-organ failure) and hypoxia (fungal pulmonary infection) and 1 was due to an unknown cause. Nine of 21 patients (43%) were reported by the investigators to have had a clinical response (CR + CRi) (Table). Conclusion: The MTD of AZD1152 in combination with LDAC in older patients with newly diagnosed AML was 1000 mg. AZD1152 at a dose of 1000 mg combined with LDAC had an acceptable tolerability profile. Two patients had DLTs of mucositis at the monotherapy MTD of 1200 mg. AEs of febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were slightly higher than those in patients treated with either agent alone, although many patients experienced these AEs at study entry. The investigator-reported clinical response rate (CR + CRi) was 43%. The development of AZD1152 is continuing with a Phase II study in older patients with AML considered unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Disclosures: Kantarjian: AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Low-dose cytosine arabinoside is an approved agent for the treatment of patients with AML; this study evaluated low-dose cytosine arabinoside in combination with AZD1152, an investigational agent that inhibits Aurora Kinase B . Sekeres:Celgene Corp: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ribrag:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LFB Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; LFB: Research Funding. Owen: AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stockman:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Oliver:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text