Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine Combined with GMCSF and Rituximab in Heavily Pre-Treated Relapsed / Refractory B-Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1616-1616
Author(s):  
Shinoj Pattali ◽  
Stephanie A. Gregory ◽  
Melissa Leigh Larson ◽  
Jamile M. Shammo ◽  
Elena Bogdanova ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1616 Background: Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are commonly treated with anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy regimens. Although a proportion of patients can be cured, 40 –50% of patients relapse or are refractory to frontline therapy. High dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the current standard of care of relapsed aggressive lymphomas in eligible patients. Many patients cannot proceed to HDT as a result of reasons like advanced age, significant co morbidities and resistance to salvage chemotherapy. Moreover, the optimal salvage regimen is not known. Hence there is need to develop novel regimens that are likely to benefit these patients. Gemcitabine and rituximab are active agents in relapsed or refractory lymphoma and have demonstrated synergistic effects. GMCSF has been shown to potentiate the efficacy of Rituximab. In this study we evaluated the clinical activity, toxicity and tolerability of a salvage regimen that incorporated sequential combination of gemcitabine, rituximab and GMCSF (Sargramostim, Leukine). Methods: This trial was designed as a prospective, open and uncontrolled phase II study. 13 patients with relapsed or refractory B cell lymphoma were enrolled from Nov 2001 to Mar 2006 at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. All patients were scheduled to receive up to 6 cycles of Gemcitabine 800mg/m2 IV infusion over 120 minutes on days 1 and 8, GMCSF 250mcg/m2 subcutaneously once daily on day 9 through 15 (7doses) and Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV infusion on day 16. Cycles were repeated every 21 days to a total of 6 cycles. Responses were evaluated by CT scans and bone marrow exam (if involved) after the third course and at the end of the study. Primary endpoint was response rate. Secondary endpoints were toxicity evaluation, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were followed for toxicity, response, PFS and OS. Results: Of the 13 patients in the study, 9 patients completed 6 cycles of therapy and were evaluable for response. The median age was 43 years (range 24 –75 years) with 6 males (66.6%) and 3 females (33.3%). 92% of patients had very advanced disease with stage III or IV disease (Stage IV-61.5% and stage III-30.8%), and 30.8% were poor risk (IPI 3–5). Major histological subtypes were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (33.3%), Hodgkin lymphoma (33.3%) and follicular lymphoma (11.1%). Eight patients (88%) demonstrated extra nodal disease at one or more sites at presentation indicating a more aggressive lymphoma. Most of the patients were heavily pretreated with multiple combination chemotherapy or chemo immunotherapy with a median of 3 prior chemotherapy regimens (range 2–6). The majority of patients were complete responders after first line induction therapy. In the intent to treat analysis of responses, the overall response rate was 55.5% with 4 complete responses (44.5%) and 1 partial response (11.1%). Disease progression occurred in 4 patients (44%). Progression free survival ranged from 2 to 71 with a median of 6 months. Overall survival measured from 2 to 102 months with a median of 10 months. At last follow-up 22% of (2 of 9) were alive. Toxicity profile of this regimen was similar to other salvage therapies used in this patient population with an increased incidence of grade 3/4 anemia (15.3%) and thrombocytopenia (7.6%).No grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicities were observed. Conclusions: Based on the result of our study, we conclude that gemcitabine combined with GMCSF and rituximab is an effective, feasible and tolerable regimen in heavily pre-treated aggressive relapsed lymphomas. Long-term remissions are possible in patients with heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory lymphoma with complete remissions lasting for 78–102 months even in patients who relapsed after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Disclosures: Shammo: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2810-2810
Author(s):  
Philip J. Bierman ◽  
Julie M. Vose ◽  
R. Gregory Bociek ◽  
Fausto R. Loberiza ◽  
Martin Bast ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2810 The survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma is improved when rituximab is combined with chemotherapy. However, little is known about the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma, grade 3 (FL-3), since these patients are generally excluded from DLBCL trials and often from trials evaluating treatment of follicular lymphoma. We therefore performed a retrospective study to evaluate the results of rituximab-based therapy for FL-3. An analysis of the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group database allowed us to identify patients with FL-3 who were treated with aggressive combination chemotherapy regimens with and without the addition of rituximab. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of these patients were compared to patients with DLBCL who were treated with similar aggressive chemotherapy regimens combined with rituximab. Patients who were not treated with anthracycline-containing or mitoxantrone-containing regimens were excluded from analyses. We identified 60 FL-3 patients who were treated with aggressive chemotherapy regimens, combined with rituximab, between Feb. 1999 and Jan. 2009. The median age was 56 years (range 37–87 years). There were 27 males and 33 females. The performance status was 0–1 in 80%, the LDH was elevated in 15%, 68% had stage III-IV disease, and 13% had at least 2 sites of extranodal disease. Fifteen patients (25%) had bulky disease (≥5 cm) at diagnosis. The results of treatment for these patients were compared to 144 FL-3 patients treated with aggressive chemotherapy regimens without rituximab between June 1983 and Jan. 1999, and to 341 patients with DLBCL who were treated with aggressive chemotherapy regimens combined with rituximab between Sept. 1996 and Jan. 2009. The treatment outcomes for these three groups of patients are displayed in the table. 5-yr Estimate (95% CI) 8-yr Estimate (95% CI) Log-Rank p-value Progression-Free Survival 0.04 FL-3 with rituximab 65% (50–77) 45% (23–65) FL-3 without rituximab 42% (34–50) 33% (26–41) DLBCL with rituximab 53% (47–58) 47% (40–54) Overall Survival 0.06 FL-3 with rituximab 85% (72–92) 71% (54–82) FL-3 without rituximab 68% (59–74) 54% (46–62) DLBCL with rituximab 64% (58–69) 56% (48–63) A multivariate analysis (accounting for older patients, and more patients with elevated LDH, extranodal disease, and bulky disease in the DLBCL group) revealed that patients with FL-3 who were not treated with rituximab had a significantly higher risk of disease progression or death (RR 1.75; p=0.02). There were no significant differences in PFS when comparing patients with FL-3 and those with DLBCL who were treated with aggressive chemotherapy regimens and rituximab. Follicular lymphoma, grade 3 patients treated without rituximab had inferior overall survival, when compared to patients treated with rituximab (RR 1.58), although this difference was not significant (p=0.16). The multivariate analysis also revealed no significant differences in survival when patients with FL-3 who received rituximab were compared to similarly treated patients with DLBCL (p=0.50). In conclusion, this analysis demonstrates that the outcome of treatment for patients with FL-3 who are treated with aggressive chemotherapy regimens is improved when rituximab is added to therapy. In the “rituximab era” the outcome of patients with FL-3 is comparable to DLBCL. Disclosures: Vose: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feifei Chen ◽  
Aziguli Maihemaiti ◽  
Zheng Wei ◽  
Luya Cheng ◽  
Weiguang Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Histologically, follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 3 is subdivided into grade 3A and 3B. However, there are limited studies on outcomes of FL grade 3A and 3B treated with frontline of RCHOP treatment. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 61 patients of FL grade 3 treated with frontline RCHOP regimen between January 2009 and December 2019. We divided them into FL grade 3A (n = 42) and aggressive FL (n = 19). Aggressive FL included grade 3A with an additional 3B component (n = 2), grade 3B (n = 8), and grade 3 with areas of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n = 9). Results The baseline characteristics were similar between FL grade 3A and aggressive FL. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 97.1% in FL grade 3A and 81.9% in aggressive FL (P = 0.041). The 3-year progression free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between two groups, with 69.1% and 71.1%, respectively (P = 0.546). However, patients of aggressive FL reached a plateau in the PFS curve after 2 years. Conclusions Compared with patients of aggressive FL, FL grade 3A patients presented an uncurable feature but associated with a better OS with frontline RCHOP treatment.


2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02259
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsu-Chih Chien ◽  
Deborah Morreall ◽  
Vikas Patil ◽  
Kelli M Rasmussen ◽  
Chunyang Li ◽  
...  

Aim: To describe practices and outcomes in veterans with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Patients & methods: Using Veteran Affairs Cancer Registry System and electronic health record data, we identified relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients completing second-line treatment (2L) in 2000–2016. Treatments were classified as aggressive/nonaggressive. Analyses included descriptive statistics and the Kaplan–Meier estimation of progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: Two hundred and seventy patients received 2L. During median 9.7-month follow-up starting from 2L, 470 regimens were observed, averaging 2.7 regimens/patient: 219 aggressive, 251 nonaggressive. One hundred and twenty-one patients proceeded to third-line, 50 to fourth-line and 18 to fifth-line treatment. Median progression-free survival in 2L was 5.2 months. Median overall survival was 9.5 months. Forty-four patients (16.3%) proceeded to bone marrow transplant. Conclusion: More effective, less toxic treatments are needed and should be initiated earlier in treatment trajectory.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4625-4625
Author(s):  
Zhixiang Shen ◽  
Junmin Li ◽  
Aihua Wang ◽  
Yu Chen

Abstract Purpose: Rituximab combined with chemotherapy has been recommended as first-line or second-line standard regimen in most subtypes of B-cell lymphoma in China by the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network lymphoma therapy guideline. We have conducted a multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in combination with standard chemotherapy (CHOP) in patients with previously untreated or relapsed indolent and aggressive NHL. Methods: Patients received 4–8 cycles of rituximab plus CHOP every 21 days. For each cycle, rituximab (375mg/m2) was given on day 1 and CHOP started on day 3. CHOP consisted of cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2, and vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (maximum 2mg/dose) given intravenously on day 3, and oral prednisone 100mg on days 3–7. Results: A total of 221 patients were enrolled on the trial, 128 males and 93 females with a mean age of 49 years (range 10–83 years). The main lymphoma subtypes were small lymphocytic (15 patients, 7%), follicular (27 patients, 12%), and diffuse large B-cell (160 patients, 72%). In total, 56 patients had indolent NHL and 165 aggressive NHL. The overall response rate for all patients was 86% with 57% complete responses. In patients with indolent NHL the overall and complete response rates were 95% and 55% respectively. After a median 12 months follow up, progression-free survival in patients with indolent NHL was 88%±5% at 1 year and 83%±6% at 2 years. In the 160 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the overall response rate was 88% with 61% complete responses, and after a mean follow-up of 6 months, predicted 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival were 88%±5% and 83%±7% respectively. Infusion-related adverse events occurred in 4% of patients, associated with the first infusion of rituximab. Subanalyses according to subtype, stage, IPI and other factors will be presented. Conclusion: Rituximab plus chemotherapy is an effective, well-tolerated treatment that achieves high response rates and long progression-free survival in both indolent and aggressive NHL.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2817-2817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
Mukesh Chhanabhai ◽  
Nicholas Voss ◽  
Shenkier Tamara ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) represent a heterogeneous group of diseases with an overall poor prognosis. Little information is available regarding the outcome of PTCL patients who present with limited stage disease. We sought to determine the outcome of PTCL patients presenting with limited disease in comparison with a cohort of patients with limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods: In a retrospective analysis we identified all patients with limited stage (non-bulky (<10cm) stage I/II disease no symptoms) PTCL diagnosed at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) between 1983 and 2004. Patients were excluded if they had cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (CutALCL) (n=13), NK/T-cell lymphoma nasal type (n=9) or primary CNS/ocular involvement (n=6). Results: Thirty-seven patients with PTCL were identified according to the World Health Organization Classification: ALK-neg ALCL 8 (22%); PTCL-unspecified (PTCLUS) 28 (78%); enteropathy associated TCL (EATL) 1 (3 %). The majority received CHOP-type chemotherapy (n=31, 86%), most with brief chemotherapy followed by involved-field radiation (n=19, 61%). The 5 y OS and PFS was similar between PTCLUS and ALK-neg ALCL. There was no difference in survival between extranodal and nodal cases. The outcome of PTCL patients (including ALK-neg ALCL and PTCLUS) was compared to a cohort of limited stage DLBCL patients (excluding CNS/ocular lymphoma) (n=305) diagnosed over the same time period and treated similarly. There was no difference in 5 y OS or PFS (Figure 1,2). Interestingly, there were no late relapses observed in PTCLUS, in marked contrast to DLBCL. Conclusions: Limited stage PTCL is rare, however outcomes appear to be comparable to early stage DLBCL, supporting that they should be treated in a similar manner. Unlike limited stage DLBCL where late relapses occur, a plateau in the progression-free survival curve is observed, highlighting a distinct natural history for limited stage PTCL. Overall Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.18 Overall Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.18 Progression-Free Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.07 Progression-Free Survival Limited Stage PTCL vs DLBCL p=.07


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2030-2030
Author(s):  
Philip Bierman ◽  
Fausto Loberiza ◽  
Bhavana Dave ◽  
Warren Sanger ◽  
R. Gregory Bociek ◽  
...  

Abstract Rearrangements of the c-myc oncogene can be seen in 5–10% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, studies examining the significance of this finding have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis to determine the clinical significance of c-myc rearrangements in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The results of classical cytogenetic studies and FISH analyses were used to identify diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cases in the database of the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group with or without c-myc rearrangements. Patients who were HIV positive and those with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease were excluded. We identified 16 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and c-myc rearrangements. All patients were initially treated with doxorubicin- or mitoxantrone-containing chemotherapy regimens. The median age of these 16 patients was 61 years (range 40 to 80), and 5 (31%) were males. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) was 0–2 at diagnosis in 9 patients (56%), and 3–5 in 7 patients (44%). Eleven patients (69%) had bulky disease (≥ 5 cm) at diagnosis. No significant differences in outcome were identified when the 16 c-myc positive patients were compared with 97 c-myc negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the same age range. The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for the c-myc positive patients was 23% (95% CI 6% to 46%), as compared with 38% (95% CI 29% to 48%) for c-myc negative patients (p=0.17). The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 36% (95% CI 14% to 59%) and 47% (95% CI 36% to 56%), respectively (p=0.19). Classical cytogenetics and FISH analyses were also used to examine the 16 c-myc positive cases for bcl-2 rearrangements. Eight (50%) cases had rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc rearrangements. These patients were similar to the c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients except for a higher likelihood of an elevated LDH level at diagnosis (88% vs. 25%; p=0.03). The actuarial 5-year progression-free survival for c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients was 0%, as compared to 33% (95% CI 6% to 66%) for patients with rearrangements of c-myc alone, and 37% (95% CI 28% to 47%) for c-myc negative patients. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rates were 12% (95% CI 1% to 42%), 47% (95% CI 12% to 76%), and 41% (95% CI 31% to 51%), respectively. A multivariate analysis, adjusting for IPI score, demonstrated that the relative risk (RR) of treatment failure was significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.32–6.23; p=0.008). Similarly, mortality was also significantly worse for the c-myc positive/bcl-2 positive patients, as compared to the c-myc negative patients (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.18–6.11; p=0.02). In contrast, no significant differences in treatment failure or overall survival were demonstrated when c-myc positive/bcl-2 negative patients were compared with c-myc negative patients. Our results demonstrate that the c-myc rearrangement is not associated with poorer survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, patients with rearrangements of bcl-2 in addition to c-myc had significantly worse progression-free survival and overall survival.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2676-2676
Author(s):  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Moon Ki Choi ◽  
Young Saing Kim ◽  
Chi Hoon Maeng ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2676 Purpose Akt is a serine/threonine kinase that plays a central role in cell proliferation and growth. To define clinical impact of Akt expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL), we investigated the expression of phospho-Akt(p-Akt) in DLBCL and analyzed clinical impact of p-Akt expression on patient survival. Methods We evaluated the p-Akt expression in 99 DLBCL patients using tissue microarray(TMA) technology. Results Positive p-Akt expression was observed in 15.2% of the patients and significantly associated with elevated lactic dehydrogenase level (P = .044). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the patients with positive p-Akt expression showed substantially poorer overall survival (p-Akt+ vs p-Akt- 25.3 months [95% confidence interval(CI), 14.4–36.2 months] vs 192.6 months [95% CI, 131.3–253.9 months], P < .001) and progression-free survival (p-Akt+ vs p-Akt- 13.6 months[95% CI, 14.4–36.2 months] vs 134.5 months [95% CI, 131.3–253.9 months], P < .001), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with DLBCL with p-Akt positivity showed poorer overall survival with 3.2 fold (95% CI, 1.6–6.8, P = .002) risk for death compared to patients with DLBCL with p-Akt negativity. Conclusion Positive expression of p-Akt in DLBCL patients is associated with poorer overall and progression-free survival. Expression of p-Akt may act as an independent poor prognostic factor and might be a novel therapeutic target for DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Safra ◽  
Tara Berman ◽  
Adelya Yachnin ◽  
Ilan Bruchim ◽  
Mihai Meirovitz ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical activity and toxicity of weekly topotecan in a large cohort of epithelial ovarian (EOC), primary peritoneal (PPC), and tubal cancer patients.MethodsRecords of patients with recurrent EOC, PPC, and tubal cancer who were treated with weekly topotecan (4.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle) after failure of more than 1 prior regimen were retrospectively reviewed in 8 centers in Israel.ResultsTwo hundred four patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Median age was 62 years (range, 27–89 years); 121 (59.3%) were platinum sensitive. Patients were exposed to a median of 2 previous lines (range, 1–9), and 48.5% received only 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. Median follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 2.5–112 months). Overall response rate was 26.5%, of which 11 patients (5.4%) had complete response, and 43 patients (21.1%) had partial response. Clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 65.7%. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5–4.5 months). There was no significant difference between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients regarding response rate or progression-free survival. Median overall survival from disease diagnosis was 45.0 months (95% CI, 40.04–49.6 months) and 16.0 months (95% CI, 12.3–19.7 months) from initiation of topotecan therapy. Overall survival was significantly different between patients with platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease (19.9 vs 10.8 months, respectively, P = 0.003; 95% CI, 8.1–16.3 months). Multivariate analysis showed that only platinum sensitivity and topotecan line were associated with overall survival. Weekly topotecan was well tolerated—with only 16.7% of patients experiencing grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities. There were no other grade 4 toxicities, and only 6.9% grade 3 toxicities.ConclusionsIn this large cohort of recurrent EOC, PPC, and tubal cancer, weekly topotecan was well tolerated with good clinical benefit rate, comparable to previous studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document