A Phase I/II Study of Pomalidomide-Cyclophosphamide-Prednisone (PCP) in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Relapsed/Refractory to Lenalidomide

Abstract Abstract 632 Background: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsed/refractory after immunomodulatory drugs and bortezomib have limited treatment options. Recently, the combination pomalidomide-dexamethasone has led to at least partial response (PR) of 25–42% in relapsed/refractory MM and 32% in patients refractory to lenalidomide. Aims: In this study we evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination pomalidomide-cyclophosphamide-prednisone (PCP) in patients with MM who received 1–3 lines of treatment and were relapsed/refractory to lenalidomide therapy. Methods: Between August 2010 and July 2011, 41 patients were enrolled; median age was 69 years (range 49–82); 23 patients relapsed after lenalidomide and 18 patients were refractory to lenalidomide. The first 24 patients entered the phase I of the study to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PCP: 4 dose levels of pomalidomide (1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 mg/day, days 1–28) were tested in combination with cyclophosphamide (50 mg every other day, days 1–28) and prednisone (50 mg every other day, days 1–28) for six 28-day cycles. Thromboprophylaxis with aspirin (100 mg/day) was recommended, low-molecular weight heparin was given to high risk patients. Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) were defined as: grade 4 neutropenia for more than 3 days, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3–4 neutropenic fever, any grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity. The MTD was achieved when 25% of patients experienced a DLT, using the Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method. In the phase II of the study, the Simon two-stage design was used and 17 additional patients were enrolled and received the MTD of pomalidomide. Results: DLTs occurred in 1/4 patient who received pomalidomide 1.5 mg (grade 4 thrombocytopenia) and in 3/12 patients who received pomalidomide 2.5 mg (grade 3 neuropathy, grade 3 hepatic toxicity and grade 4 thrombocytopenia). The MTD was defined at 2.5 mg/day, with an estimated DLT probability of 0.258 (95% credibility interval: 0.101–0.468). 32 patients received at least one cycle of therapy and could be evaluated for efficacy and safety. At least PR was reported in 19/32 (59%) patients, including 2 complete response (CR), 5 very good partial response (VGPR), 12 PR. In patients refractory to lenalidomide, at least PR was reported in 11/15 (73%) patients, including 1 CR, 2 VGPR, 8 PR. Grade 4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia (9%) and thrombocytopenia (9%). Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity included infection (9%), rash (9%), neurologic (6%) and hepatic (3%) toxicities. Thromboembolism occurred in 1 patient. Conclusions: At least PR was achieved in 73% of patients refractory to lenalidomide; grade 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia were less than 10%. The combination pomalidomide (2.5 mg/day), cyclophosphamide (50 mg every other day), prednisone (50 mg every other day) showed high response rates with limited toxicities in patients relapsed/refractory to lenalidomide. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Palumbo: Amgen: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Larocca:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Guglielmelli:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Giuliani:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Weekly Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (wCCd) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: A Phase I- II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.175.175 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 175-175 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Davide Rossi ◽

Sara Bringhen ◽

Alessandra Larocca ◽

Fabiana Gentilini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Carfilzomib is a novel second generation proteasome-inhibitor with significant anti MM activity and favorable toxicity profile, including very limited neurotoxicity and neutropenia. This Phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of once weekly carfilzomib combined with cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (wCCd) and to assess safety and efficacy of this combination in elderly patients with newly diagnosed MM. Here we report the first findings from the Phase I dose-escalation and expansion portions. Enrolment in the phase II portion is ongoing. Methods In the Phase I, the standard 3+3 dose-escalation scheme was adopted, with Carfilzomib as the only escalating agent starting at 45 mg/m2 (level 0), maximal planned dose 70 mg/m2 (level 2), and 36 mg/m2, if needed (level -1), given IV on days 1, 8, 15 in 28-day cycles. Oral cyclophosphamide was administered at 300 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 and oral dexamethasone at 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, 22 for all dose levels. Dose escalation of Carfilzomib was based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. After completion of 9 cycles, patients receive 28-day maintenance cycles with Carfilzomib (days 1, 8, 15) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) defined by the Phase I study until disease progression or intolerance. The objectives were to determine the MTD and assess activity and safety. Results As of June 15, 2014, 28 newly diagnosed MM patients were enrolled. Median age was 74 years, 29% of patients were older than 75 years, 36% had ISS stage III, 24% had unfavorable FISH profile [t(4;14) or t (14;16) or del17p]. Twelve patients were enrolled in the Phase I portion of the study. At dose level 0 (Carfilzomib 45 mg/m2) no DLT was reported; at dose level 1 (Carfilzomib 56 mg/m2), 1 of 6 patients experienced DLT, consisting of grade 3 creatinine increase; at dose level 2 (Carfilzomib 70 mg/m2) no DLT occurred. The MTD of weekly Carfilzomib was thus established as 70 mg/m2. Toxicity and response data are available for 25 patients, who have completed at least the first cycle; 3 patients are currently receiving their first cycle of treatment. Grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events occurred in less than 15% of patients and included neutropenia (12%, 3 patients), anemia (12%, 3 patients), acute pulmonary edema (8%, 2 patients), pulmonary embolism (4%, 1 patient), creatinine increase (4%, 1 patient), nausea (4%, 1 patient), and fatigue (4%, 1 patient). No peripheral neuropathy was observed. Overall, the wCCd regimen was well tolerated, 3 patients (12%) required Carfilzomib dose reduction (grade 3 creatinine increase, grade 3 transaminase increase and grade 2 fever) and 3 patients (12%) required drug discontinuation due to adverse events (2 acute pulmonary edemas and 1 creatinine increase). Patients received a median of 5 cycles (range 1-9). After 4 induction cycles, 83% of patients achieved at least partial response, 39% at least very good partial response, and 22% complete response. Responses improved over time, as shown in table 1. During the study, only 2 patients progressed and 1 patient died, due to acute pulmonary edema considered probably related to treatment. Conclusions This is the first prospective study evaluating once weekly carfilzomib in treatment-naïve MM. wCCd therapy appears safe and effective in newly diagnosed MM patients. Responses became deeper with subsequent cycles and toxicities were manageable. The response rate observed with weekly carfilzomib compares favorably with similar studies with standard twice weekly carfilzomib infusion. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Table 1 2nd cycle 4th cycle 6th cycle Complete Response 5% 22% 27% At least Very Good Partial Response 9% 39% 63% At least Partial Response 73% 83% 91% Disclosures Palumbo: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Use off-label of Carfilzomib (proteasome inhibitor).. Bringhen:Merck Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen and Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy. Larocca:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cavallo:Onyx: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Boccadoro:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gaidano:Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Filgrastim On Complete Remission Rates and CD34+ Stem Cell Collections in Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.4349.4349 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 4349-4349

Author(s):

Tomer Mark ◽

Megan C. Manco ◽

Maureen Lane ◽

Maureen Ward ◽

Donna Skerrett ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4349 Background The combination of lenalidomide (Len, Revlimid®), bortezomib (Bz, Velcade®), and dexamethasone (dex; RVD) has shown excellent efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients, with overall response rates (ORR) of 69%, including 26% complete/near complete responses (CR/nCR), and manageable toxicities (Anderson et al. ASCO 2009). The phase I portion of the study (Richardson et al. IMW 2009) found the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination in newly diagnosed MM patients to be Len 25 mg/day, Bz 1.3 mg/m2, and dex 20 mg. In all phase I patients, the ORR (PR or better) was 100%, including 31% CR, 9% nCR, and 75% ≥very good partial response (VGPR). Results reported here are for patients treated in the phase II portion of the study. Methods Patients were treated with Len 25 mg/day (days 1–14), Bz 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11), and dex 20 mg (cycles 1–4) and 10 mg (cycles 5–8) on the day of and day after Bzfor up to eight 21-day cycles. Patients received prophylactic anticoagulants. Responses were assessed by modified EBMT and Uniform criteria to include nCR and VGPR. Patients with at least partial response (≥PR) could proceed to ASCT after ≥4 cycles; responding patients who did not go on to ASCT could continue therapy at their physician's discretion. Patients with ≥grade 2 peripheral neuropathy (PNY) by CTCAE v3 were excluded. Thirty five patients were enrolled in the phase II portion of this study and were evaluable for both efficacy and safety. Results Median age was 59 years (range 22-86), 54% were men, 34% / 54% / 11% were ISS Stage I / II / III, and 57% / 31% had IgG / IgA MM, respectively. Patients received a median of 8 cycles of Bz and dex and 11 cycles of Len; 11 (31%) patients remain on therapy. Among the 24 patients who have gone off therapy, 5 (21%) completed treatment per protocol, 8 (33%) proceeded to ASCT, 3 (13%) had progressive disease (all during cycle 14 or later), 1 (4%) withdrew due to toxicities, 1 (4%) received non-protocol therapy, and the remaining (n=6; 25%) withdrew consent or stopped treatment due to physician decision. All patients (100%) had a best confirmed pre-ASCT response of ≥PR, with 54% CR/nCR and 69% ≥VGPR (Table). Response rates in the 31 and 24 patients who completed 4 and 8 cycles, respectively, are shown in the Table. Among the 24 patients without CR at cycle 4, response improved between cycles 4 and 8 in 16 (67%) patients. Fifteen of the 35 (43%) patients were mobilized for ASCT, with a median stem cell yield of 4.4 × 106 (2.3–6.6 × 106) CD34+ cells/kg. After median follow-up of 19.3 months, median time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) have not been reached; the estimated 1-year TTP and PFS are 76% and the estimated OS is 100%. Treatment-emergent grade 3 and 4 adverse events that occurred in >1 patient included lymphopenia (n=7; 20%), hypokalemia (n=3; 9%), and fatigue and neutropenia (n=2; 6% each). Sensory PNY of any grade occurred in 27 (77%) patients, which was grade 1 (n=18; 67%) and grade 2 (n=8; 30%) in the majority of patients; only one patient had grade 3 sensory PNY. Neuropathic pain and motor PNY were reported in 10 (29%; all grade 1 and 2) and 6 (17%; 1 grade 3) patients, respectively, with no grade 3 PNY seen. Importantly, PNY was reversible with dose reduction, supportive care, and/or completion of therapy. Thrombosis/thromboembolism was reported in just 2 (6%) patients. No treatment-related mortality was seen. Conclusion These phase II results suggest that RVD is a highly effective combination, with a pre-ASCT ORR of 100% and high rates of CR/nCR, and encouraging time-to-event analyses to date. RVD was well tolerated, with limited rates of grade 3 PNY and DVT/PE despite prolonged use of Bz and Len. Data from patients treated at the MTD in phase I and the impact of adverse risk factors (including advanced stage and high-risk cytogenetics) on outcome, as well as following ASCT, will be reported at the meeting. Based upon these promising results, phase II/III studies of RVD and RVD-based combinations are either planned or ongoing. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Skerrett:Angioblast Systems, Inc.: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Mesoblast Ltd: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Council of Human Blood and Transfusion Services for NYS DOH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schuster:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Shore:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zafar:Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Proteolix: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I/IIa Study of the Human Anti-CD38 Antibody MOR202 (MOR03087) in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3035.3035 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3035-3035 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Marc S Raab ◽

Manik Chatterjee ◽

Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽

Hermine Agis ◽

Igor W Blau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Dependent Cell ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels ◽

Support Research

Abstract Background: CD38 is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed at high levels on multiple myeloma cells. MOR202 is a HuCAL-derived, human, IgG1 anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody showing effective antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis (ADCP), and high activity in preclinical models of multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods: Here we reportinterimsafety and preliminary efficacy data from this ongoing, multicenter, MOR202 dose-escalation, phase I/IIa study in patients with relapsed or refractory disease who had failed ≥2 prior therapies for multiple myeloma, including an immunomodulatory drug and a proteasome inhibitor. The objectives are to evaluate the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended dose and preliminary efficacy of MOR202 when administered as monotherapy or in combination with dexamethasone (DEX); pomalidomide (POM) + DEX; and lenalidomide (LEN) + DEX. Patients received MOR202 as a 2-hour intravenous infusion every 2 weeks (q2w; dose levels 0.01-16 mg/kg), 4 mg/kg weekly (q1w) and 4, 8 and 16 mg/kg q1w + DEX. The combination cohorts receiving MOR202 8 mg/kg with LEN + DEX and POM + DEX have been opened, and the 16 mg/kg q1w with LEN + DEX or POM + DEX, as well as confirmation cohorts, are planned. Results: As of 26 June 2015, 44 patients have been treated; 31 and 13 patients in the q2w and q1w dose levels, respectively. Median age was 69 years (range 44-80); median number of prior therapy lines was 4 (2-11). The MTD has not been reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at any grade were anemia (15 patients, 34%), fatigue (14 patients, 32%), infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and leukopenia (13 patients, 30% each), lymphopenia and nausea (11 patients, 25% each). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported for 28 patients (64%); the most common included lymphopenia (8 patients, 18%), leukopenia (5 patients, 11%) and hypertension (4 patients, 9%). IRRs arose mainly during the first infusion; all were grade 1-2 except for one patient (grade 3); no IRRs occurred in patients receiving MOR202 in combination with DEX. Infections were commonly reported (26 patients, 59%) but in the majority of the cases were not considered to be treatment-related. There have been no treatment-related deaths. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data demonstrated a significant target-mediated drug disposition effect for most patients treated q2w. By contrast, patients treated q1w (4 or 8 mg/kg) showed constant or slightly accumulating MOR202 trough levels, suggesting the potential for full target occupancy at 16 mg/kg. Long-lasting tumor control has already been observed in early monotherapy cohorts, including one partial response and one very good partial response in the weekly cohorts; efficacy analyses are ongoing. First data from the dose escalation of the weekly cohorts with DEX and the combination cohorts with LEN + DEX and POM + DEX will be presented. Conclusions: At doses up to 16 mg/kg,MOR202 was safe and well tolerated. Encouraging preliminary activity of MOR202 was observed, especially with the weekly regimen. PK data show the potential for full target occupancy in patients receiving MOR202 16 mg/kg q1w. This dosing schedule of MOR202 is currently being tested in combination with DEX, LEN + DEX, and POM + DEX. Disclosures Raab: MorphoSys: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Einsele:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ferstl:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Case report presentation. Weisel:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Other: Travel Support; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Noxxon: Consultancy. Klöpfer:MorphoSys: Employment. Weinelt:MorphoSys: Employment. Härtle:MorphoSys: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Bendamustine Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1856.1856 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1856-1856 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Suzanne Lentzsch ◽

Amy O’Sullivan ◽

Silvana Lalo ◽

Carrie Kruppa ◽

Diane Gardner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1856 Poster Board I-882 Background: Lenalidomide is an analog of thalidomide that has shown significant clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), both as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone. Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent that is approved for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or relapsed within 6 months following a rituximab-containing regimen. Bendamustine combined with lenalidomide may be an effective treatment option for MM patients, particularly those with preexisting or bortezomib-induced neuropathy. Our primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile of bendamustine and lenalidomide when administered with dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with confirmed, measurable stage 2 or 3 MM that was refractory to or progressed after 1 or more prior therapies, including lenalidomide, received bendamustine by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2, oral lenalidomide on days 1–21, and oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued until a plateau of best response, as determined by the IBMTR/ABMTR, was reached. Study drug doses were escalated through 4 levels (Table), with 3–6 patients enrolled at each level depending on the rate of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After determining the MTD, up to an additional 12 patients will be enrolled in an MTD expansion arm to better evaluate toxicity and clinical activity. Secondary endpoints included preliminary efficacy, as evidenced by objective response, time to disease progression, and overall survival. Results: To date, 11 patients have been enrolled, with a median age of 63 years (range, 38–75 years). The MTD of bendamustine and lenalidomide has not been identified at this point; currently, patients are enrolling on dose level 3 with 100 mg/m2 bendamustine and 10 mg lenalidomide. Thus far, DLT included 1 grade 4 neutropenia at dose level 2. Nine of 11 patients are currently eligible for response assessment. A partial response was observed in 67% of patients, including 1 very good partial response and 5 partial responses (PR). Two patients experienced stable disease and 1 exhibited progressive disease. Grade 3/4 adverse events included grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, hyperglycemia, and prolonged QTC, and 1 grade 4 neutropenia. Conclusions: Bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone form a well-tolerated and highly active regimen even in heavily pretreated MM patients, with a PR rate of 67%. Additional updates on response and MTD will be available at the time of presentation. Disclosures: Lentzsch: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is not FDA approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma in the USA. Burt:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mapara:Resolvyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Spouse is consultant , has received research funding, and participates on advisory board; Cephalon: Spouse has received funding for clinical trial and participates on advisory board. Redner:Biogen: Equity Ownership; Wyeth: Equity Ownership; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roodman:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy. Zonder:Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cephalon: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Speaking (CME only); no promotional talks.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Excellent Tolerability and Promising Activity In a Heavily Pretreated Population

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1951.1951 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1951-1951 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

Donna Weber ◽

Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Response Rate ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone In Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies In Dual-Refractory Disease

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.863.863 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 863-863 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Martha Lacy ◽

Sumithra Mandrekar ◽

Morie Abraham A Gertz ◽

Suzanne R. Hayman ◽

Kristen Detweiler Short ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Median Number ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Therapeutic Benefit ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Phase Ii Trials ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Dosing Strategies ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 863 Background: Patients with MM who have progressed after multiple novel agents have limited treatment options. Pomalidomide (CC4047) is the newest immunomodulatory (IMiD) agent. Pom/dex using a dose of 2 mg/day has demonstrated response rates (≥PR) of 63% in relapsed MM (Lacy, JCO 2009, 27:5008-5014) and 32% in a lenalidomide-refractory cohort (Lacy, Leukemia, in press). The maximum tolerated dose has been determined to be 4 mg/day for 21 of 28 days (Richardson, ASH, 2009), We opened two sequential phase II trials using the Pom/dex regimen at differing doses to study the efficacy of this regimen in patients who have failed both lenalidomide and bortezomib. Methods: Patients refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib therapy; defined as relapsing on or within 60 days of stopping each regimen, were enrolled. Pomalidomide was given orally 2 mg daily (Cohort A) or 4mg daily (Cohort B) on days 1–28 of a 28-day cycle with oral dexamethasone given 40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Response was assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. All patients received aspirin 325 mg daily for DVT prophylaxis. Results: 35 patients with relapsed and resistant/refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib were enrolled in each cohort. The median age was 62 years (range, 39–77) in Cohort A and 61 (range, 45–77) years in Cohort B. The median time from diagnosis to enrollment was 57 months for Cohort A (range 12–249) and 72 months(range, 13–183) for Cohort B. 15 patients had high risk molecular markers in Cohort A and 16 in Cohort B. The median number of prior regimens was 6 in both groups. The median (range) duration on treatment was 5(1-13) and 2(0-6) cycles in cohorts A and B respectively. Toxicity at least possibly attributed to drug consisted primarily of myelosuppression: grade 3/4 neutropenia (37% Cohort A vs. 55% Cohort B); grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11% Cohort A vs. 13% Cohort B); and grade 3/4 anemia (9% Cohort A vs. 16% Cohort B). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities occurred in 23% Cohort A vs. 13% Cohort B. Grade 1 or 2 fatigue was the most common non-hematologic toxicity seen in 43% Cohort A vs. 52% Cohort B. Grade 1 or 2 neuropathy occurred in 17% Cohort A vs. 16% Cohort B. Other non-hematologic toxicities occurring in <5% included pneumonitis, hyperglycemia, renal failure, thrombosis. One patient in cohort B had grade 4 hepatitis. Confirmed responses in Cohort A consisted of VGPR 14%, PR 11%, and MR 24% (ORR 49%, 95% CI: 31–66), and responses in Cohort B consisted of VGPR 9%, PR 20%, and MR 12% (ORR 40%, 95% CI: 23–58). The median follow-up on alive patients was 7.5 months, and 3 months in Cohorts A and B, respectively. The median PFS in cohorts A and B are respectively 6.4 months (95% CI: 4.7-NR) and 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.3-NR). Conclusions: Pom/dex is remarkably active and well tolerated in this heavily pre-treated population of dual bortezomib/lenalidomide-refractory MM patients. The majority of patients have not progressed and objective responses (MR or better) are seen in 40–49%. This study confirms therapeutic benefit for Pom/dex in patients relapsing after other novel therapies. These studies do not show an advantage for the 4 mg/day on days 1–28 of each 28 day cycle did not show an advantage over the 2 mg/day on days 1–28 of each 28 day cycle. Disclosures: Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Gertz:Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Binding Site: Honoraria. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding. Fonseca:Genzyme: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celegene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Intellikine: Consultancy; Cylene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; FISH probes prognostication in myeloma: Patents & Royalties. Bergsagel:Celgene: Consultancy; Centocor: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Stewart:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label Phase I Study of the Safety and Efficacy of RAD001 in Combination with Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3856.3856 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3856-3856 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Noopur Raje ◽

Paul Richardson ◽

Parameswaran N Hari ◽

Anuj Mahindra ◽

Sarah Kaster ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Oral Steroid ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3856 Poster Board III-792 Background Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients following ≥1 prior therapy. mTOR inhibitor RAD001 has been studied as a single agent in MM, and although well tolerated, did not have single agent activity. Given the increased toxicity noted with pulsed high dose steroids, we sought to study a non-steroid containing oral regimen for the treatment of relapsed MM predicated upon our previous studies which demonstrated synergistic anti-MM activity of mTOR inhibitors when combined with len. Here, we extended our in vitro observations to a phase I clinical trial combining RAD001 with len in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The primary objective was to assess toxicity of this combination and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary objective was to determine the activity of this combination. Methods Patients with relapsed and refractory MM were assigned to len and RAD001 to be taken for 21 days of a 28 day cycle. Dose escalation followed a modified Fibonacci design. Patients were allowed to continue therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients received concomitant anti-thrombotic (aspirin 81 or 325 mg/day) therapy. Response was assessed according to modified EBMT and Uniform Criteria, and toxicities were assessed using NCI CTCAE v3.0. Results Eighteen MM patients have been enrolled to date. One patient in cohort 1 (Len: 10mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) developed grade 3 neutropenia requiring expansion of the cohort. Cohort 2 (Len: 15mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) also required expansion because of grade 4 thrombocytopenia noted in 1 patient. Dose limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 2/3 patients in cohort 3 (Len: 20mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days). The MTD for patients with MM was therefore declared at 15 mg of len and 5mg of RAD001 for 21 days with a 7 day rest period. Apart from the hematological toxicities expected with the combination, patients otherwise tolerated the regimen well. Most common (≥10%) grade 1 / 2 events included nausea, fatigue, dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, neuropathy and muscle cramps, all of which were manageable with supportive care. No thromboembolic events were noted. Grade 3 / 4 adverse events ≥ 5% included thrombocytopenia (11%) and neutropenia (22%). Fifteen patients have finished at least 2 cycles of therapy: 8 of 15 patients have either stable disease (SD: 1), minimal response (MR: 5) or a partial response (PR: 2), including 7 of 9 patients treated at the recommended MTD for an overall response rate (MR or better) of 50% (90% CI: [30.76%]). One patient with SD continued therapy for a total of 10 cycles, without significant toxicities. Conclusions The combination of Len plus RAD001 is a well tolerated regimen with predictable hematological toxicities. Promising responses were noted in this heavily pretreated patient population. This combination provides an oral steroid free combination alternative strategy which warrants future evaluation in phase II studies. Disclosures: Raje: Astrazeneca : Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: RAD001 not labelled for use in myeloma. Richardson:Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hari:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Laubach:Novartis:. Ghobrial:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Adams:Novartis: Employment. Makrides:Celgene: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Multicenter, Open Label Study of Oral Lenalidomide and Prednisone (RP) Followed by Oral Lenalidomide Melphalan and Prednisone (MPR) and Oral Lenalidomide Maintenance In Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1940.1940 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1940-1940 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Antonio Palumbo ◽

Patrizia Falco ◽

Giulia Benevolo ◽

Davide Rossi ◽

Angelo Michele Carella ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Autologous Transplantation ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Level 2

Abstract Abstract 1940 The combination of Melphalan-Prednisone-Lenalidomide (MPR) has shown promising results in elderly newly diagnosed myeloma patients. In the transplant setting, low-dose chemotherapy (induction) precedes high-dose chemotherapy (autologous transplantation consolidation). This approach reduces tumor mass, with few side effects, before achieving the maximum cyto-reduction with autologous transplantation. The same approach has been designed for the elderly patients. Accordingly induction with lenalidomide plus corticosteroids precedes consolidation with MPR. A two-stage phase II clinical trial was planned to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Lenalidomide-Prednisone (RP) as induction, followed by Melphalan-Prednisone-Lenalidomide (MPR) as consolidation and Lenalidomide as maintenance in elderly myeloma patients. Unfit patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma older than 65 years were enrolled. No exclusion criteria were included in the protocol, to avoid the selection of fit elderly subjects only. Patients with low blood count, abnormal performance status, hepatic, renal, cardiac or pulmonary functions were enrolled. Patients received 4 RP courses (Lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks, plus Prednisone 50 mg three times/week for 4 weeks) followed by 6 MPR cycles (Melphalan 2 mg and Prednisone 50 mg three times/week, for 4 weeks plus Lenalidomide 10–15 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks) and maintenance with Lenalidomide alone (10 mg/day for 21 days every 4 weeks). Two different dose-levels of Lenalidomide were tested in combination with MP: 15 mg (dose-level 1) and 10 mg (dose-level 2). Each cohort included 12 patients, with additional 22 patients enrolled at dose-level 2. Patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity after completion of at least 2 MPR cycles. Forty-six patients (median age 75, range 65–88) were enrolled. Thirty-six patients were evaluable after a median of 7 cycles and a median follow-up of 8.5 months. During RP induction, the most frequent grade 3–4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (19%), anemia (11 %), thrombocytopenia (6%). During MPR consolidation, grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (45%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Neutropenia was increased by the addition of melphalan, but both thrombocytopenia and anemia were reduced. Non-hematological toxicities were more frequent during RP cycles and reduced during MPR cycles (cutaneous rash and infections). After RP induction, at least partial response (PR) rate was 67%, at least very good partial response (VGPR) was 17%. After 2 MPR cycles, PR rate increase to 72%, including 22% of patients who achieved at least a VGPR. Conclusions. Induction with RP followed by consolidation with MPR showed a manageable safety profile and reduced the risk of anemia, thrombocytopenia and non-hematological toxicity in unfit elderly myeloma patients. These data will be updated at the meeting. Disclosures: Palumbo: Celgene Srl: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janseen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with melphalan for multiple myeloma patients at diagnosis. Guglielmelli:Celgene: Honoraria; Janseen-Cilag: Honoraria. Gay:Celgene: Honoraria. Cavallo:Celgene: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janseen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Final Results of a Frontline Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (CRd) in Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.631.631 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 631-631 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Andrzej J Jakubowiak ◽

Dominik Dytfeld ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

David H. Vesole ◽

Tara B. Anderson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Growth Factors ◽

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Low Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 631 Introduction: In relapsed and/or refractory MM, the combination of carfilzomib (CFZ) with lenalidomide (Len), and low-dose dexamethasone (Dex) (CRd) has shown very promising efficacy (78% ≥partial response [PR], 40% ≥very good partial response [VGPR], and 24% CR/nCR) and good tolerability including a low rate of peripheral neuropathy (Wang et al, ASCO, 2011). In a Phase I/II study of newly diagnosed MM, the regimen was well tolerated in the Phase I portion of the study up to a maximum dose of CFZ 36 mg/m2, Len 25 mg, and Dex 40 mg, and very active with 96% ≥PR, 70% ≥VGPR, and 55% CR/nCR (Jakubowiak et al, ASH 2010). The lack of overlapping toxicities has allowed these agents to be used at full doses and for extended periods. Here we report the results for all patients (pts) enrolled in both phases of this first prospective trial of CFZ combination in new MM. Methods: In the initial eight 28-day cycles, pts were treated with CFZ at 20 mg/m2, 27 mg/m2 (Phase I), and 36 mg/m2 (Phase I and II), given IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16, Len at 25 mg PO (days 1–21), and Dex at 40/20 mg PO weekly (cycles 1–4/5–8). Pts achieving ≥PR could proceed to stem cell collection (SCC) using growth factors alone (protocol recommendation) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) after 4 cycles. Per protocol, ASCT candidates were offered the option to continue CRd treatment after SCC. After 8 cycles, pts received 28-day maintenance cycles of CFZ (days 1, 2, 15, 16), Len days 1–21, and Dex weekly at the doses tolerated at the end of 8 cycles. Responses were assessed by IMWG criteria with the addition of nCR. Results: Enrollment was completed (53 pts): 4 pts at CFZ 20 mg/m2, 13 at CFZ 27 mg/m2 and 36 at CFZ 36 mg/m2 (18 in Phase I and 18 in Phase II). Median age was 59 years (range 35–81; 23 pts ≥65), 60% had ISS stage II/III, and 33% (of 49 with available data) had unfavorable cytogenetics: del 13 or hypodiploidy by metaphase, or t(4;14), t (14;16), del 17p by FISH. As of June 30, 2011, toxicity data (cycles 1–8) were available for 51 pts. Hematologic toxicities were reversible and included Grade (G) 3/4: anemia (18%), neutropenia (12%), and thrombocytopenia (10%). The most common non-hematologic toxicities (all G) were hyperglycemia (76%), hypophosphatemia (61%), and infection (53%). G3/4 non-hematologic AEs included hyperglycemia (24%), DVT/PE while on ASA prophylaxis (10%), infection (6%), and mood alteration (2%). PN was limited to G1/2 sensory (24%). Forty-five pts continue treatment with 22 pts in the maintenance phase. Six pts discontinued treatment: 2 proceeded to ASCT, 1 due to toxicity, and 3 due to events unrelated to treatment or per pt wish. The majority of pts did not require dose modifications, either in the initial (31%) or in the maintenance (25%) phase. After a median of 8 cycles (range 1–20), the best responses per IMWG criteria for 49 response-evaluable pts (all pts who completed 1+ cycle) are shown in the Table. Responses were rapid with 46/49 pts achieving at least PR after 1 cycle, and improved with the duration of treatment reaching 100% ≥PR after 4 cycles and 100% ≥VGPR, 79% CR/nCR after 12 cycles. Responses were deep even at the 2 lower dose levels with the majority of pts at 36 mg/m2 still early in treatment. Responses in pts with unfavorable cytogenetics were similar to response rates in all remaining pts and included a 100% ≥PR in 6 pts with del 17p. Twenty-four pts proceeded to SCC after a median of 5 cycles of CRd (range 4–9); using growth factors only in 23 pts and cyclophosphamide and growth factors in 1 pt, with a median 6.55 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg collected (range 3.75–9.6); all resumed CRd treatment. After a median of 9.5 months of follow-up, only 1 pt has progressed, and all are alive Conclusions: CRd is highly active and well-tolerated allowing the use of full doses for an extended time in newly-diagnosed MM pts with limited need for dose modification. Responses are rapid and improve over time reaching 100% ≥VGPR and early time-to-event data are very encouraging. These results compare favorably to the best frontline regimens in MM. Disclosures: Jakubowiak: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Use of the investigational agent carfilzomib, proteasome inhibitor, in the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; OrthoBiotec.Imedex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medicom World Wide: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Optum Health Education: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PER Group: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vesole:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Hussein:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Leveque:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Vij:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase I/II Trial Of Everolimus, Bortezomib and Rituximab In Relapsed Or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4402.4402 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4402-4402 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Irene M. Ghobrial ◽

Erica N Boswell ◽

Stacey Chuma ◽

Ranjit Banwait ◽

Courtney Hanlon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Response ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

Complete Response ◽

Recommended Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction The phase I aimed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of the combination of everolimus and rituximab, or everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab and the phase II study aimed to examine response and safety of the combination of all 3 agents in relapsed and/or relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia. This trial was based on our preclinical studies that demonstrated synergistic activity of everolimus and bortezomib with rituximab in WM. Methods Eligibility criteria include: 1) patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory WM with any number of prior lines of therapy, including everolimus and bortezomib 2) not completely refractory to rituximab 3) measurable disease by monoclonal IgM protein in the serum and lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow, 4) Not receiving chemotherapy > 3 weeks, or biological/novel therapy for WM > 2 weeks. A cycle is 28 days and a total of 6 cycles are given, followed by everolimus maintenance until Progression. The phase I trial included two stages with a total of four dose levels. In stage A, patients received everolimus at the recommended dose orally daily for 28 days and rituximab at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. In stage B, patients received everolimus at the recommended dose orally daily for 28 days, bortezomib at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days, and rituximab at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. For the phase II study, patients received everolimus 10 mg daily, bortezomib IV 1.6mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days, and rituximab 375mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. Patients were assessed for response after every cycle. Subjects who had a response continued on therapy for a total of 6 cycles, and then continued on to maintenance therapy with everolimus alone until progression Results Forty-Six patients were enrolled in this phase I/II clinical trial from April 2009 to July 2013. The median age is 65 (range, 47–84) yrs and the median lines of prior therapy is 5 (range, 1–9) with 45 (98%) patients receiving prior rituximab and 23 (50%) receiving prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy was 19.5 (range, 0–39). Overall, this combination therapy is very well tolerated. Grade 4 toxicities included: neutropenia (4.3%), leukopenia (2.2%), thrombocytopenia (13%), lymphopenia (2.2%) and hypertriglyceridemia (2.2%). Grade 3 toxicities included: neutropenia (13%), leukopenia (13%), anemia (10.9%), lymphopenia (8.7%), pneumonitis (4.3%), SGPT (4.3%), neuropathy (4.3%), Herpes zoster reactivation (4.3%), (2.2%) bacterial endocarditis, (2.2%) congestive heart failure, (2.2%) hearing loss, hyperglycemia (4.3%) hypernatremia (4.3%) and 1(2.2%) subject had an incarcerated inguinal hernia with small bowel obstruction. Two patients discontinued therapy due to grade 3 anemia. For the phase II study, sixteen patients are currently evaluable for response, including 2 (13%) complete response (CR), 11 (68%) partial response and 1 (6%) minimal response (MR), for an overall response rate including MR of 14/16 (88%) in this relapsed/refractory population. Furthermore, overall response including MR in phase I was 1/23 (4%) complete response, 7/23 (30%) partial response and 10/23 (43%) minimal response. In phase II 1/23 (4%) complete response, 14/23 (61%) partial response and 2/23 (9%) minimal response. Additionally, 8 (17%) patients achieved stable disease. Conclusions The combination of everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab is generally well tolerated, and importantly no grade 3/4 neuropathy was seen. The responses observed to date indicate that this combination is highly effective in this relapsed/refractory population. This study was supported from the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development and by Millennium/Takeda and Novartis Inc. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Treon:Millennium: Consultancy. Matous:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text