The Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor PCI-32765 Induces Durable Responses in Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL): Follow-up of a Phase Ib/II Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 983-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
Kristie A. Blum ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cellular Migration ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Btk Inhibitor ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 983 Introduction: Btk is a central mediator of B-cell receptor signaling which is essential for normal B-cell development. PCI-32765 is an orally-administered irreversible inhibitor of Btk which induces apoptosis and inhibits cellular migration and adhesion in malignant B-cells. An early analysis of the phase Ib/II study PCYC-1102 showed PCI-32765 to be highly active and tolerable in patients with CLL (Byrd, ASCO 2011). Here we report longer-term follow-up of this multicenter phase Ib/II trial. Methods and Patients: Two cohorts of CLL patients (previously untreated ≥65 years old and relapsed/refractory [R/R] disease following at least 2 prior therapies, including fludarabine) were treated with oral PCI-32765 administered daily for 28-day cycles until progression of disease. Doses of 420mg (previously untreated and R/R) and 840mg daily (R/R) were examined. The patients with R/R disease are the subject of this report. Results: Sixty-one R/R CLL/SLL patients were enrolled (420mg cohort n=27, 840mg cohort n=34). The median follow-up time for the 420mg cohort is 10.2 months and for the 840mg cohort is 6.5 months. The median number of prior treatment regimens for the 420mg cohort was 3 (2–10) and for the 840mg cohort was 5 (1–12). Seventy-two percent of patients had at least one poor-risk molecular feature: del(17p) 31%, del(11q) 33%, IgVH un-mutated 57%. Treatment has been well tolerated. Two patients have discontinued for adverse events (AE); 6 patients have required reduction of PCI-32765 dose (420mg cohort 2/27, 840mg cohort 4/34). Grade 1 or 2 diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and ecchymosis have been the most frequently reported AEs. Serious AEs (SAEs) have occurred in 38% of patients; SAEs considered potentially related to PCI-32765 have occurred in 10% of patients. Grade ≥3 AEs considered potentially related to PCI-32765 occurred in 21% of patients. A characteristic pattern of response, with a transient phase of lymphocytosis typically peaking within the first 2 months of Rx, followed by resolution over time, has been observed in the majority of patients. Objective response (ORR; PR + CR) by IWCLL criteria in the 420mg cohort cohort, previously reported as 48% with 6.2 months median follow-up (Byrd, et al ASCO 2011), is now 70% with 10.2 months median follow-up. ORR in the 840mg cohort is 44% at 6.5 months median follow-up. An additional 19%, and 35% of patients in these cohorts, respectively, have a nodal PR (>50% reduction in aggregate lymph node size) with residual lymphocytosis. ORR appears to be independent of molecular risk features. Eighty-two percent of patients (50/61; 420mg cohort 22/27, 840mg cohort 28/34) remain on PCI-32765. Only 8% (5/61) of patients have had progressive disease (PD); 6-month PFS is 92% in the 420mg cohort and 90% in the 840mg cohort. Treatment cessation not related to PD or AE includes: death (n=2) or investigator discretion (n=3). Conclusions: The potent Btk inhibitor PCI-32765 is well tolerated and is associated with high rates of 6-month PFS in R/R CLL/SLL. Phase III trials of PCI-32765 in CLL/SLL are planned. Disclosures: O'Brien: Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Burger:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Blum:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Coutre:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Sharman:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Flinn:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Grant:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Heerema:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Johnson:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding. Navarro:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Holmgren:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Consultancy. Hedrick:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Byrd:Pharmacyclics, Inc: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Interim Analysis of a Phase 1 Study of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate SGN-CD19A in Relapsed or Refractory B-Lineage Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1741-1741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Paul Hamlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background CD19, a B-cell specific marker, is expressed in the majority of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). SGN-CD19A is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a maleimidocaproyl linker. Methods This ongoing phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study investigates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-CD19A in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL (NCT 01786135). Eligible patients are ≥12 years of age and must have a confirmed diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including transformed follicular histology; mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL3); Burkitt lymphoma; or B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Patients must be relapsed or refractory to at least 1 prior systemic regimen. Patients with DLBCL or FL3 must have also received intensive salvage therapy with or without autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), unless they refused or were deemed ineligible. A modified continual reassessment method is used for dose allocation and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) estimation. SGN-CD19A is administered IV on Day 1 of 21-day cycles (0.5–6 mg/kg). Response is assessed with CT and PET scans according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results To date, 44 patients have been treated: 39 patients (89%) with DLBCL (including 10 with transformed DLBCL), 4 (9%) with MCL, and 1 (2%) with FL3. Median age was 65 years (range, 33–81). Patients had a median of 2 prior systemic therapies (range, 1–7), and 10 patients (23%) had autologous SCT. Twenty-six patients (59%) were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 18 (41%) were relapsed. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of treatment (range, 1–12) at doses from 0.5–6 mg/kg. Eleven patients (25%) remain on treatment, and 33 have discontinued treatment (18 due to progressive disease [PD], 5 for investigator decision, 5 for adverse events [AE], 4 because of patient decision/non-AE, and 1 for SCT). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in Cycle 1 has been reported. Treatment-emergent AEs reported in ≥20% of patients were blurred vision (59%), dry eye (39%), fatigue (39%), constipation (32%), keratopathy (23%), and pyrexia (20%). Corneal exam findings consistent with superficial microcystic keratopathy were observed in 25 patients (57%) and were mostly Grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 corneal AEs were observed in 4 patients at the higher doses; the majority resolved or improved to Grade 1/2 at last follow-up. Corneal AEs were treated with ophthalmic steroids, and during the trial steroid eye drop prophylaxis was instituted with each dose of study drug. SGN-CD19A ADC plasma exposures were approximately dose-proportional. Accumulation was observed following multiple dose administrations, consistent with a mean terminal half-life of about 2 weeks, suggesting less frequent dosing might be possible. In the 43 efficacy-evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) is 30% (95% CI [17, 46]), including 7 complete responses (CRs; 16%) and 6 partial responses (PRs; 14%). Of the 13 patients with an objective response, 8 are still on study with follow-up times of 0.1–31 weeks; 2 are no longer on study; and 3 had subsequent PD or death with response durations of 14, 19, and 31 weeks. Table Best Clinical Response by Disease Status Relative to Most Recent Therapy, n (%) Relapsed N=17 Refractory N=26 Total N=43 CR 5 (29) 2 (8) 7 (16) PR 4 (24) 2 (8) 6(14) SD 4 (24) 9 (35) 13 (30) PD 4 (24) 13 (50) 17 (40) ORR (CR + PR), (95% CI) 53 (28, 77) 15 (4, 35) 30 (17, 46) Conclusions To date, SGN-CD19A has shown evidence of clinical activity with an ORR of 30% and CR rate of 16%. Enrollment in the trial is ongoing to further refine optimal dose and schedule. SGN-CD19A is generally well-tolerated. No DLTs have been observed in tested dose levels. Observed ocular AEs are manageable with steroid eye drops and dose modifications. The high response rate (53%) in relapsed patients and low rate of bone marrow suppression or neuropathy suggest that SGN-CD19A could be incorporated into novel combination regimens in earlier lines of therapy. Disclosures Moskowitz: Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: SGN-CD19A is an investigational agent being studied in patients with B-cell malignancies. SGN-CD19A is not approved for use. . Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shah:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; SWOG: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; NCCN: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Advani:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda International Pharmaceuticals Co.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel expenses Other. Hamlin:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Bayer: Consultancy; Eli Lily: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kostic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandalic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhao:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel expenses Other.

Interim Results of an International, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Durable Efficacy and Tolerability with Longer Follow-up

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 904-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wang ◽  
Simon A. Rule ◽  
Peter Martin ◽  
Andre Goy ◽  
Rebecca Auer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 904 Background Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a central mediator of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling which is essential for normal B-cell development. Ibrutinib is an orally administered inhibitor of BTK that induces apoptosis and inhibits cellular migration and adhesion in malignant B-cells. MCL is an aggressive subtype of NHL, and despite high response rates to initial therapy, patients often relapse with acquired chemotherapy resistance and short response durations to conventional therapy. Preliminary results in 51 evaluable patients from the Phase 2 PCYC-1104 study demonstrated ibrutinib could achieve rapid nodal responses (including complete responses) in relapsed and refractory MCL patients (Wang et al, ASH 2011). Treatment with ibrutinib was associated with a transient increase in peripheral lymphocyte count representing a compartmental shift of cells with the CD19+/CD5+ phenotype from nodal tissues to peripheral blood (Chang et al, ASH 2011). Reported here are interim results of an international study of single-agent ibrutinib in previously treated MCL. Methods Subjects with relapsed or refractory MCL who were either bortezomib-naïve or bortezomib-exposed (prior treatment with at least 2 cycles of bortezomib) were enrolled. Ibrutinib was administered orally at 560mg daily (in continuous 28-day cycles) until disease progression. Bortezomib-naive and bortezomib-exposed cohorts were evaluated separately. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles according to the revised International Working Group for NHL criteria. The primary endpoint of the study is overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints include: duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Subjects A total of 115 subjects (65 bortezomib-naïve and 50 bortezomib-exposed) were enrolled between February 15, 2011 and July 3, 2012. Of the 111 subjects treated, 109 subjects were evaluable for efficacy (received at least one dose of ibrutinib and underwent ≥ 1 tumor response assessment). Baseline characteristics include median age 68 years (40–84), median time since diagnosis 42 months, median number of prior treatments 3 (1–6), bulky disease (≥ 10 cm) 13%, Ann Arbor stage IV at screening 77.4%, prior stem cell transplant 9.6%, high risk by MIPI score at baseline assessment 48.7%, and refractory disease 44.3%. Results Safety data are available for 111 subjects. Treatment-emergent AEs occurring in ≥ 15% of subjects: diarrhea (35%), fatigue (32%), upper respiratory tract infections (23%), nausea (21%), rash (21%), dyspnea (20%), and oedema peripheral (15%). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurring in ≥ 5% of subjects were neutropenia (11%), anemia (5%), diarrhea (5%), dyspnea (5%), pneumonia (5%), and thrombocytopenia (5%). Grade 4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (5%), hyperuricaemia (2%), and pancytopenia (1%). One grade 5 AE, pneumonia, was thought to be treatment-related. In the efficacy evaluable subjects, the ORR (complete + partial responses) is reported in Table 1. The median time on treatment was 6.0 months (0.7-16.6 months); 53% of subjects remain on treatment. Median DOR, PFS and OS have not been reached: 9 month DOR 65%, 12 month estimation of PFS 53% and OS 67%. Responses to ibrutinib increase with longer time on study treatment. Time to PR ranged from 1.4 – 8.3 months (median 1.9) and CR ranged from 1.7 – 11.2 months (median 3.9). This is seen with longer follow-up on the initial 51 subjects reported at ASH 2011: median time on study treatment was 3.8 months and is now 11.3 months; ORR was 69% and is now 74.5%; CR rate was 16% and is now 35.3%. Conclusions Longer follow up demonstrates the durability of responses and confirms the unprecedented single agent activity of ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory MCL in terms of ORR. The treatment- emergent AEs were consistent with safety data previously reported. A pivotal study in relapsed and refractory MCL patients following bortezomib treatment has been initiated. Disclosures: Wang: Pharmacyclic: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ibrutinib is a novel agent being studied in a clinical trial. Rule:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Martin:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Goy:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Auer:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Kahl:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Jurczak:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Advani:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. McGreivy:pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clow:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stevens-Brogan:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kunkel:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blum:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Mature Follow up from a Phase 2 Study of PI3K-Delta Inhibitor Idelalisib in Patients with Double (Rituximab and Alkylating agent)-Refractory Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1708-1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Sven de Vos ◽  
Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽  
Stephen J. Schuster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab-alkylator combinations are the standard therapies for patients (pts) with iNHL, however, refractory disease nearly uniformly develops. Once iNHL becomes “double-refractory” to both rituximab + alkylating agents, there are limited options to induce durable remissions. PI3K-delta signaling is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells, and is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib, a selective oral inhibitor of PI3Kd, demonstrated considerable clinical activity in double-refractory iNHL (Gopal NEJM 2014). FDA granted accelerated approval for Idelalisib (Zydelig®) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies with relapsed FL or SLL. Based on these encouraging initial results, we now describe long-term follow up, safety, and remission durations of this double-refractory iNHL population treated with idelalisib. Methods: Eligible iNHL pts included those with measurable disease refractory to both rituximab and an alkylating agent. Refractory was defined as lack of response to, or progression of lymphoma within 6 months of completion of index therapy, confirmed by imaging. Idelalisib 150 mg PO BID was administered continuously until disease progression or intolerance. Responses were evaluated by an independent review committee, using standard criteria (Cheson, 2007, and Owen 2013). The new data cutoff date for this analysis was June 2014, 20 months after the last patient enrolled. Results: Enrolled pts (N = 125) had a median age of 64 years and included follicular lymphoma (FL) n=72 (58%), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) n=28 (22%), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=15 (12%) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) n=10 (8%). The median number of prior therapies was 4 [range 2-12], including bendamustine/rituximab (BR) (n=60) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) (n=56) and autologous transplant (n=14). 81 pts (65%) had prior bendamustine, of which 61/81 (75%) were refractory. 112 pts (90%) were refractory to their last regimen, and 99 pts (79%) were refractory to ≥2 regimens. 38 pts (30%) had elevated LDH, and 33 pts (26%) had bulky disease >7 cm. The median time to progression from last prior therapy was 3.9 months. With a median exposure of 11.1 months (range 0.7 to 35.4), the overall response rate (ORR) is 56% (95% CI = 46.8-64.9) with 70 responders, comprising 12 CRs (9.6%), 58 PRs (46.4%). The median time to response was 1.9 months (time of first evaluation) and time to CR was 4.5 months. There were 43 pts with stable disease (SD) (34.4%). 90% of pts experienced some decrease in tumor burden. ORR for iNHL subtypes is: FL (54%), SLL (61%), MZL (47%), and LPL/WM (70%). CR rate for iNHL subtypes is: FL (14%), SLL (4%), MZL (7%), and LPL/WM (0%). Among responders, median DOR is 13.9 (0.03-31.3) months. DOR for iNHL subtypes in months (Figure 1) is: FL 11.8, SLL 13.9, MZL 18.4, and LPL/WM (not yet reached). Median PFS for all pts is 11.0 months, in comparison to a median PFS of the last prior regimen of 3.9 months (p<.0001). The median PFS for individual subtypes in months was: FL 11.0, SLL11.1, MZL 6.6, and LPL/WM 22.2. The median overall survival of all patients was 30.8 months. The adverse events include (total%/≥ grade 3%) diarrhea/colitis (50/18), fatigue (30/2), nausea (31/2), cough (32/0), pyrexia (30/2), dyspnea (18/5), rash (14/2), pneumonia (14/11), and pneumonitis (4/3). Based on central laboratory measurements, Grade ≥3 ALT/AST elevations occurred in 18 pts (14%). Drug was temporarily held in these pts, and 11/15 pts (73%) were re-treated without recurrence of ALT/AST elevation. Overall, 30 pts (24%) have discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions: The prolonged administration of idelalisib was well tolerated, had an acceptable safety profile, and was highly effective in inducing and maintaining remissions in double-refractory iNHL population with an ORR of 56%, PFS of 11 months, and DOR of 13.9 months. The response rate and long term duration of responses in the small number of subjects with LPL/WM is very promising, and will be evaluated in larger trials of this disease. The observed disease control compared to prior regimens suggests the potential for prolonged clinical benefit in this challenging patient population with unmet medical need. Figure 1: Duration of Response by Disease Group. Figure 1:. Duration of Response by Disease Group. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. Kahl:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. de Vos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schuster:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Jurczak:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flowers:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Martin:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Viardot:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Blum:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Goy:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Davies:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Zinzani:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Dreyling:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Holes:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sorensen:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Godfrey:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Salles:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

Bortezomib Plus Melphalan–Prednisone Continues to Demonstrate a Survival Benefit Vs Melphalan–Prednisone in the Phase III VISTA Trial in Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma After 3 Years' Follow-up and Extensive Subsequent Therapy Use.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3859-3859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽  
Paul G Richardson ◽  
Rudolf Schlag ◽  
Nuriet K Khuageva ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Ortho Biotech ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3859 Poster Board III-795 The initial results of the pivotal, international, phase III VISTA trial demonstrated the superiority of bortezomib (Velcade®) plus melphalan–prednisone (VMP) versus MP alone across all efficacy end points, including overall survival (OS), in previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM) patients ineligible for high-dose therapy (San Miguel et al, N Engl J Med 2008). We conducted a planned updated survival analysis of VISTA after a median >3 years of follow-up and with the majority of patients having received subsequent therapy. We confirmed the previously demonstrated OS benefit of VMP versus MP, examined the use of subsequent therapy and its efficacy following VMP and MP, and evaluated the survival of patients who had received subsequent therapy. Patients were randomized to receive nine 6-week cycles of VMP (N=344; bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, d 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, 32, cycles 1–4, d 1, 8, 22, 29, cycles 5–9; melphalan 9 mg/m2 d 1–4, prednisone 60 mg/m2, d 1–4, all cycles) or MP (N=338) alone. Response was assessed using EBMT criteria with central laboratory M-protein analysis. After disease progression, patients were followed for survival and subsequent therapy, including investigator-assessed best response to subsequent therapies. The median age of patients was 71 years, 30% were aged ≥75 years, 34% had ISS stage III MM, and 33% had β2-microglobulin >5.5 mg/L. After median follow-up of 36.7 months, there was a 35% reduced risk of death with VMP vs MP (hazard ratio [HR] 0.653, p=0.0008); median OS was not estimable vs 43.1 months, and 3-year OS rates were 68.5% vs 54.0% with VMP vs MP, respectively. This OS benefit was seen consistently across patient subgroups predefined by baseline characteristics. Within the VMP arm, OS was longer among patients aged <75 vs ≥75 years (HR 1.664, p=0.011; 3-year OS: 74.1% vs 55.5%); by contrast, there were no significant differences, although there were trends to longer OS among patients with creatinine clearance ≥60 versus <60 mL/min (HR 1.291, p=0.238; 3-year OS: 74.5% vs 63.1%) and patients with standard- vs high-risk cytogenetics (HR 1.346, p=0.399; 3-year OS 71.6% vs 56.1%). At data cut-off (16 March 2009), 178 (52%) VMP and 233 (69%) MP patients had received subsequent therapy; median time to subsequent therapy (28.1 vs 19.2 months, HR 0.527, p<0.0001) and median treatment-free interval (17.6 vs 8.4 months, HR 0.543, p<0.0001) were superior with VMP vs MP. Receipt of and response to subsequent bortezomib-, thalidomide-, and lenalidomide-based therapy are summarized in the Table. Median survival from start of subsequent therapy following VMP and MP was 30.2 vs 21.9 months (HR 0.815, p=0.21) among all patients receiving subsequent therapy. This updated analysis of VISTA confirms that VMP results in significantly longer OS compared with MP, despite 50% of MP patients being rescued with bortezomib-based therapy in the relapsed setting. VMP treatment used upfront appears more beneficial than treating with conventional agents and saving bortezomib- and other novel-agent-based treatment until relapse. Subsequent therapies appeared similarly effective in the VMP and MP arms, with our analysis also demonstrating the benefit of retreatment with bortezomib-based therapies following VMP. In addition, post-relapse survival among all patients receiving subsequent therapy appeared longer following VMP, indicating that frontline bortezomib use does not induce more resistant relapses. Table Response among patients who received subsequent therapy VMP (N=178) MP (N=233) Received subsequent therapy containing:*     Bortezomib, n (%) 43 (24) 116 (50)     Thalidomide, n (%) 81 (46) 110 (47)     Lenalidomide, n (%) 57 (32) 30 (13) Overall response rate (%) to subsequent therapy:     Bortezomib-based 47 59     Thalidomide-based 41 53     Lenalidomide-based 59 52 * Patients could have received >1 agent, either in combination or separately in different subsequent lines of therapy Disclosures: Mateos: Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dimopoulos:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria; Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Shpilberg:Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kropff:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Petrucci:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Palumbo:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Dmoszynska:Millennium: Research Funding. Schots:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Esseltine:Millennium: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cakana:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. San Miguel:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Durable Responses Following Treatment with the PI3K-Delta Inhibitor Idelalisib in Combination with Rituximab, Bendamustine, or Both, in Recurrent Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Phase I/II Results

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3063-3063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sven de Vos ◽  
Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Marshall T. Schreeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Abstract Introduction: PI3K-delta signaling is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells, and is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib, a selective oral inhibitor of PI3Kd, demonstrated considerable clinical activity as monotherapy in recurrent (Flinn, Blood 2014) or refractory iNHL subjects (Gopal, NEJM 2014). FDA granted accelerated approval for Idelalisib (ZYDELIG®) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies with relapsed FL or SLL. This study evaluated Idelalisib in combination with rituximab, bendamustine, or both. We now present mature safety and response data with up to 4 years of follow up. Methods: Eligible patients had relapsed/refractory indolent NHL. Idelalisib (Z) was administered continuously with rituximab (R) (375 mg/m2 given weekly for 8 doses) (R/Z regimen), with bendamustine (B) (90 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 2, for 6 cycles) (B/Z regimen), or in combination with R (375 mg/m2, on Day 1) and B (90 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle, for 6 cycles (BR/Z regimen). Initial subjects in the R/Z and B/Z groups (n=8 each), received Idelalisib 100 mg/dose BID. Thereafter, all patients received an Idelalisib dose of 150 mg/dose BID. Tumor response was evaluated according to standard criteria (Cheson 2007). The cutoff date for this analysis was June 2014, 26 months after the last patient enrolled. Results: Between April 2010 and May 2012, 79 subjects with iNHL were enrolled (including 59 with FL, 15 with SLL, and 5 with MZL). Median [range] age was 61 [37-84] years. At baseline patients had elevated beta-2 microglobulin (59%), stage IV disease (58%), bulky adenopathy (> 5cm) (48%), anemia (Hgb <12gm/dL) (41%), and elevated LDH (28%). Patients had a median number of 3 prior therapies (range 1 -11). Most patients had received a rituximab-containing regimen (98%), an alkylating agent (86%), or an anthracycline (53%). Approximately 46% of patients were refractory to their last pre-study therapy and 58% of patients were refractory to rituximab. Frequent adverse events (all grade %/grade 3-4 %) included pyrexia (54/3), nausea (44/0), fatigue (43/4), diarrhea (39/15), rash (38/9), cough (35/0), pneumonia (22/19), pneumonitis (4/3), and febrile neutropenia (3/3). Laboratory abnormalities included lymphopenia (75/62), neutropenia (56/41), anemia (47/10), thrombocytopenia (42/8), and serum transaminase elevations (56/17). Drug was temporarily held for Grade 3/4 ALT/AST elevations, and 8/13 pts (62%) were re-treated without recurrence of ALT/AST elevation. 27% of pts have discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Of the 79 subjects enrolled, 64 had an objective response with an ORR of 81% (95% CI: 70.6-89.0). Complete responses were demonstrated in 26 patients (33%), and partial responses in 38 patients (48%). In addition, 7 patients had stable disease (9%), and 4 patients had progressive disease (5%) as best response on-study. Four patients were non-evaluable, as they did not have follow up CT scans. By treatment subgroup, the ORR were (n=24/32) 75% (95% CI: 57-89) for R/Z, (n=29/33) 88% (95% CI: 72-97) for B/Z, and (n=11/14) 79% (95% CI: 49-95) BR/Z. The CR rates were 25% (n=8/32), 36% (n=12/33), and 43% (n=6/14) respectively; stable disease was noted in 4/32 patients (13%), 3/33 patients (9%), and 0/14 patients in the three groups respectively. ORR/CR by iNHL subtype is: FL (81%/39%), SLL (73%/13%), and MZL (100%/20%). The median progression-free survival is 32.8 months. Median PFS for R/Z group is 29.7 months, B/Z group 32.8 months, and BR/Z group 37.1 months. The PFS at 24 months was 55%, 64%, and 71% for the R/Z, B/Z, and BR/Z groups respectively. The median duration of response has not yet been reached. Median DOR for the R/Z group is 28.6 months, for the B/Z, and BR/Z groups it is not yet reached. The DOR at 24 months was 65%, 67%, and 64% for the R/Z, B/Z, and BR/Z groups respectively. Figure 1: Median overall survival is not yet reached. Conclusions: Idelalisib in combination therapy was well tolerated, had an acceptable safety profile, and was highly effective in this recurrent iNHL population with an ORR of 81%, and CR rate of 33%. Responses are durable beyond 2 years, supporting further evaluation of these combination regimens. Phase 3 trials evaluating the efficacy of Idelalisib in combination with R or BR in iNHL are ongoing (NCT01732913, NCT01732929). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures de Vos: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Coutre:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schreeder:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Fowler:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Sharman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Boccia:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Barrientos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Rai:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Boyd:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Furman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Holes:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Godfrey:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leonard:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

TGR-1202, a Novel Once Daily PI3K-Delta Inhibitor, Demonstrates Clinical Activity with a Favorable Safety Profile in Patients with CLL and B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4154-4154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen A. O'Connor ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Timothy S. Fenske ◽  
Changchun Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Pi3k Delta

Abstract Background: TGR-1202 is a novel, next generation PI3Kδ inhibitor which exhibits a differentiated safety profile from other PI3Kδ inhibitors, both approved and in development, and has demonstrated activity in patients (pts) with advanced heme malignancies (ASH 2014). Herein we present updated safety and efficacy results from a Ph I study of TGR-1202 in pts with rel/ref CLL and lymphoma. Methods: TGR-1202 is administered orally once-daily (QD) following a 3+3 dose escalation design. Eligible pts have rel/ref non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), or other B-cell malignancy and an ECOG PS ≤ 2. Endpoints include safety, PK/PD, and efficacy. Results: As of August 2015, 75 pts are evaluable for safety including pts with CLL, FL, Hodgkin's (HL), DLBCL, MCL, and MZL. Patients had a median age of 65 yo (range: 22-85), 67% male, ECOG 0/1/2: 26/47/2, median prior Tx: 3 (range: 1-14), and 49% refractory to prior Tx. No Gr≥3 AEs were observed in ≥10% of pts. AEs (all grades, all causality) in >20% of pts were limited to nausea (44%, Gr3/4 0%), diarrhea (36%, Gr3/4 1%), and fatigue (31%, Gr3/4 3%). Notably, general tolerability and the incidence of hepatotoxicity and colitis appear significantly less than that reported with other agents in this class. Expansion cohorts are open at 800 mg, 1000 mg, and 1200 mg QD. Of 16 evaluable CLL pts, 15 (94%) achieved a nodal PR (median nodal ↓ of 76%), of which 10 (63%) achieved a PR per Hallek 2008 criteria. Among the 32 evaluable NHL patients, 10 achieved an objective response, including 3/11 evaluable patients with DLBCL, while responses have been limited in pts with MCL (1/5) and HL (1/9). Of the 16 evaluable indolent NHL (FL & MZL) pts, 14 (88%) have achieved reductions in tumor burden with 6 pts on study for over 12 cycles (and durations upwards of 29+ cycles), with 5/12 FL and 1/4 MZL pts achieving an objective response to date. Notably, a strong exposure-response relationship has been observed. Of the 24 patients starting TGR-1202 at 800 mg or 1200 mg of the micronized formulation, 19 (79%) remain on therapy, with 9/18 (50%) evaluable pts (6 too early to evaluate) achieving an objective response to date (range on study 3 - 49+ weeks). Conclusions: TGR-1202 is well tolerated in pts with rel/ref heme malignancies with a distinct safety and tolerability profile from other PI3K-delta inhibitors (with 43% of pts on study 6+ Cyc) and promising activity in CLL and NHL. Enrollment continues in expansion cohorts and registration directed Phase 3 studies are planned. Disclosures Flinn: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Fenske:Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Deng:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Kuhn:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy; Otsuka American Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Azaya Therapeutics: Consultancy. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vakkalanka:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals SA: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals The First-in-Class Anti-CD47 Antibody Magrolimab (5F9) in Combination with Azacitidine Is Effective in MDS and AML Patients: Ongoing Phase 1b Results

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 569-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A Sallman ◽  
Adam S. Asch ◽  
Monzr M. Al Malki ◽  
Daniel J. Lee ◽  
William B. Donnellan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Equity Ownership

Background Magrolimab (previously named 5F9) is a first-in-class antibody targeting CD47, a macrophage immune checkpoint and "don't eat me" signal on cancers. CD47 blockade induces tumor phagocytosis and eliminates leukemia stem cells (LSC) in AML models. Azacitidine (AZA) synergizes with magrolimab by inducing "eat me" signals on AML, to enhance phagocytosis. A Phase 1b trial of magrolimab+AZA was initiated in MDS/AML patients with preliminary reported results mainly from the safety cohort demonstrating high response rates in both diseases. Here we report data from the expansion cohort of this ongoing trial. Methods Results from this Phase 1b reported here focus on treatment of magrolimab+AZA in untreated intermediate to very high risk MDS patients by IPSS-R and untreated AML (induction chemotherapy ineligible) patients. A magrolimab priming/intrapatient dose escalation regimen (1-30 mg/kg weekly) was utilized to mitigate on target anemia. AZA dosing was 75mg/m2 days 1-7 on a 28 day cycle. Responses were assessed by IWG 2006 and ELN 2017 criteria for MDS and AML patients, respectively. Results 43 patients (18 MDS and 25 AML) with a median of 73 years of age were treated with magrolimab+AZA. 19% were intermediate cytogenetic risk with 63% poor risk (19% unknown). 28% of patients harbored a TP53 mutation. Magrolimab+AZA was well-tolerated with a safety profile similar to AZA monotherapy. Treatment-related AEs (&gt;15% of patients) for magrolimab+AZA were anemia (37%), neutropenia (26%), and thrombocytopenia (26%). Treatment-related febrile neutropenia occurred in only 1 (2%) patient. Only 1 patient discontinued due to an AE. 29 patients were evaluable for efficacy at time of data cut. 13/13 (100%) untreated MDS patients had an objective response with 7 patients (54%) achieving a CR, 5 (39%) with marrow CR (3/5 also had hematologic improvement (HI)), and 1 (7%) with HI alone. In AML, 11/16 (69%) had an objective response; 8/16 (50%) with CR or CRi, 2 (13%) with PR, 1 (6%) with MLFS, and 5 (31%) with stable disease. Time to response was more rapid (median 1.9 mos) than expected for AZA alone. For those with abnormal cytogenetics at baseline, 40% and 44% of MDS and AML patients achieved a cytogenetic CR, respectively. 4/8 (50%) AML patients with CR/CRi and 2/12 (17%) MDS patients with CR or marrow CR were MRD negative by flow cytometry. 11/16 (69%) AML patients became RBC transfusion independent and 11/13 (85%) MDS patients had hematologic improvement. Given that CD47 is an LSC marker on leukemic cells, CD34+CD38- putative LSC frequency was measured by flow cytometry in the bone marrow in 5F9+AZA treated AML/MDS patients. In data available for analysis, LSCs were completely eliminated in 10/16 (63%) of AML/MDS patients who had a clinical response. Lastly, mutational analyses are ongoing to correlate subgroups with response. Interestingly, 7/8 (88%) evaluable TP53 mutant patients (5/6 AML patients [5 CR/CRi], 2/2 MDS [1 CR, 1 marrow CR]) achieved an objective response, highlighting efficacy in a poor prognosis and therapy-refractory population. No median duration response or overall survival has been reached for either MDS or AML patients with a median follow-up of 4.9 months (range 3.1 - 8.8 months) for MDS and 5.8 months (range 1.9 - 9.5 months) for AML. Conclusions Magrolimab+AZA is a novel immunotherapy regimen that blocks a key macrophage checkpoint. The combination therapy continues to be well tolerated with robust activity in MDS and AML patients with an ORR of 100% and 69%, respectively. High rates of putative LSC eradication suggest potential durable responses, with no median duration of response yet reached. Initial data indicate that 5F9+AZA may be particularly effective in TP53 mutant patients, a treatment-refractory subgroup. Expansion cohorts are ongoing (NCT03248479) with registrational studies in MDS being initiated. Additional patients, follow-up, and mutational characterization will be reported at time of presentation. Funded by Forty Seven and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine. Disclosures Sallman: Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Bayer: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Forty Seven, Inc.: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding. Daver:Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Hanmi Pharm Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; NOHLA: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Komrokji:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; JAZZ: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau. Van Elk:Forty Seven, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lin:Forty Seven, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Takimoto:Forty Seven, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Chao:Forty Seven, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Vyas:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Forty Seven, Inc.: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau.

Effect of Ruxolitinib On the Incidence of Splenectomy in Patients with Myelofibrosis: A Retrospective Analysis of Data From Ruxolitinib Clinical Trials.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2847-2847
Author(s):  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Ruben A. Mesa ◽  
Alessandro M. Vannucchi ◽  
Jason Gotlib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Massive Splenomegaly ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Phase Iii Studies

Abstract Abstract 2847 Background and Purpose: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a progressive Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by debilitating symptoms, massive splenomegaly, and anemia, which severely impairs quality of life. When medical therapy is not effective or tolerated, splenectomy may be required to ease symptoms in patients with symptomatic portal hypertension, massive splenomegaly, and/or frequent red blood cell transfusions (Barbui et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:761–770). In a recent study (Tefferi et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:25–33) up to 27% of patients diagnosed with MF eventually underwent splenectomy. However, splenectomy is associated with limited duration of symptom response, high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality, and acceleration of hepatomegaly. Clinical studies in patients with MF have demonstrated that ruxolitinib, an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, provides significant and durable reductions in splenomegaly, the burden of MF-associated symptoms, and also improved quality of life. In this post hoc analysis of pooled data from these studies, we determined the incidence of splenectomy in patients treated with ruxolitinib and those who received placebo or best available therapy (BAT) to evaluate whether ruxolitinib therapy may affect the need for splenectomy. Methods: This analysis included patients who participated in the ruxolitinib phase I/II trial (N=153; Verstovsek et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1117–1127); COMFORT-I, a phase III, 24-month placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib (N=309; Verstovsek et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:799–807); and COMFORT-II, a phase III, 48-month randomized trial comparing the effects of ruxolitinib and BAT (N=219; Harrison et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:787–798). Incidence of splenectomy while on treatment or during the protocol-specified follow-up period, adjusted for differences in the duration of follow up, was calculated for patients on ruxolitinib, placebo, or BAT. Results: As a result of the crossover rules and a higher discontinuation rate on the comparator arms in the phase III studies, mean follow-up duration for placebo (0.67 years) or BAT (0.95 years) overall was substantially shorter than mean follow-up duration for ruxolitinib (1.78 years). Baseline characteristics of the 14 patients who underwent splenectomy were as follows: median age=63 years; median time since initial diagnosis=7.8 years; median spleen length (n=13): 17.0 cm (range: 0–28.0 cm); median spleen volume (in those with measurement, n=11)=2924 cm3 (range: 1203–6807 cm3); IPSS high risk=50%, intermediate-2 risk=43%, intermediate-1=7%. Among patients originally randomized and treated with ruxolitinib, the incidence of splenectomy was 1.1 events per 100 patient years (Table). For patients treated with placebo or BAT in the phase III studies, the incidence of splenectomy was approximately three times higher at 2.9 events per 100 patient years, despite the fact that patients on placebo or BAT were allowed to crossover to ruxolitinib if they had worsening symptomatic splenomegaly. Conclusions: Although limited by small numbers, results of this analysis suggest that ruxolitinib reduces the need for splenectomy in patients with MF. Because of crossover to ruxolitinib and higher discontinuation rates in placebo and BAT, follow-up duration was shorter in these treatment arms compared with ruxolitinib. Further, ruxolitinib treatment in crossover patients may have prevented progression of symptomatic splenomegaly in some patients who may have otherwise become candidates for splenectomy. Our analysis may underestimate the true incidence of splenectomy among patients not receiving ruxolitinib therapy and therefore, the relative reduction in splenectomy rate in patients receiving this therapy. Longer-term follow up will better define the splenectomy rate in ruxolitinib-treated patients. Disclosures: Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Kiladjian:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; YM Bioscience: Research Funding. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gotlib:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Support for travel to meeting for the study or other purposes from Incyte Other. Kantarjian:Incyte: grant support Other. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Peng:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandor:Incyte Corporation: An employee of Incyte and receiving stock options as part of his compensation Other, Employment. Harrison:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding.

A Phase 1 Study of Denintuzumab Mafodotin (SGN-CD19A) in Relapsed/Refactory B-Lineage Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 182-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig H Moskowitz ◽  
Michelle A Fanale ◽  
Bijal D Shah ◽  
Ranjana H Advani ◽  
Robert Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Denintuzumab mafodotin (SGN-CD19A) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a maleimidocaproyl linker. CD19 is a B-cell-specific marker expressed in the vast majority of patients (pts) with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods An ongoing phase 1, dose-escalation study is investigating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of denintuzumab mafodotin in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell NHL (NCT 01786135). Eligible pts were ≥12 yrs of age and were R/R to ≥1 prior systemic regimens; pts with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL3) also received intensive salvage therapy ± autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), unless they refused or were ineligible. Denintuzumab mafodotin was administered IV every 3 weeks (q3wk; 0.5-6 mg/kg) for dose escalation and every 6 weeks (q6wk; 3 mg/kg) in a subsequent expansion cohort. A modified continual reassessment method was used for dose allocation and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) estimation in the q3wk dosing schedule. Archived tissue was collected to assess potential biomarkers of response. Results To date, 62 pts have been treated, including 53 pts (85%) with DLBCL (of whom 16 had transformed DLBCL), 5 (8%) with mantle cell lymphoma, and 3 (5%) with FL3. Median age was 65 yrs (range, 28-81). Pts had received a median of 2 prior systemic therapies (range, 1-6); 15 pts (24%) had prior ASCT. Thirty-seven pts (60%) were refractory to the most recent prior therapy. Fifty-two pts were treated in the q3wk schedule (0.5-6 mg/kg), and 10 pts were treated with 3 mg/kg q6wk. Five pts remain on treatment (2 q3wk pts, 3 q6wk pts). Overall, 20 (33%) of 60 efficacy-evaluable pts achieved objective responses, including 13 (22%) with CRs. Eighteen of the 20 objective responses were achieved by the end of Cycle 2 (15 q3wk pts, 3 q6wk pts). Table.Q3wk Dosing (N=51)Q6wk Dosing (N=9)RelapsedaN=22RefractorybN=29RelapsedaN=3RefractorybN=6Best clinical response, n (%)Complete remission (CR)7 (32)3 (10)3 (100)-Partial remission (PR)4 (18)3 (10)--Stable disease (SD)6 (27)7 (24)-3 (50)Progression5 (23)16 (55)-3 (50)ORR (CR+PR), % (95% CI)50 (28, 72)21 (8, 40)100 (29, 100)-CR rate, % (95% CI)32 (14,55)10 (2, 27)100 (29, 100)-ORR=objective response rateaBest response of CR/PR with most recent prior therapybBest response of SD/PD with most recent prior therapy Median duration of objective response in the q3wk schedule was 39 wks for relapsed pts (95% CI: 11.6, - [range, 0.1+ to 73+ wks]) and 41 wks for refractory pts (95% CI: 13.7, 67 [range, 13.7 to 67 wks]); this included 2 pts who maintained their responses for >15 mos. Data for the q6wk schedule are not yet mature. The MTD was not reached at 0.5-6 mg/kg q3wk, and only 1 DLT was observed (G3 keratopathy at 3 mg/kg). Toxicity profiles were similar across both dosing schedules; the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were blurry vision (65%), dry eye (52%), fatigue and keratopathy (35% each), constipation (29%), photophobia (27%), and nausea (26%). Ocular symptoms and corneal exam findings consistent with superficial microcystic keratopathy were observed in 52 pts (84%); symptoms were less severe than the associated corneal exam findings. Keratopathy was managed with topical steroids and dose modifications, and improved/resolved within a median of ~5 wks (range, 1-17) in pts for whom there was sufficient follow-up. ADC PK demonstrated a mean terminal half-life of ~2 wks, and accumulation was observed following multiple dose administrations in both schedules. Conclusions Denintuzumab mafodotin is generally well tolerated and demonstrates encouraging activity with durable responses in heavily pre-treated pts with B-cell NHL. In relapsed pts, 56% achieved objective responses with a CR rate of 40% across both the q3wk and q6wk schedules. The low rate of myelosuppression and neuropathy suggests that denintuzumab mafodotin could be incorporated into novel combination regimens in earlier lines of therapy. A randomized phase 2 trial is being initiated to evaluate RICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) ± denintuzumab mafodotin pre-ASCT as second-line treatment for pts with DLBCL. Disclosures Moskowitz: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Denintuzumab mafodotin (SGN-CD19A) is not approved for use.. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding. Shah:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; DeBartolo Institute for Personlaized Medicine: Research Funding; Rosetta Genomics: Research Funding; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, INC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Plexus Communications: Honoraria; Spectrum: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; SWOG: Consultancy; NCCN: Consultancy. Chen:Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kim:Bayer: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Consultancy. Kostic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Travel expenses. Peng:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding.

The Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) Promotes High Response Rate, Durable Remissions, and Is Tolerable in Treatment Naïve (TN) and Relapsed or Refractory (RR) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (SLL) Patients Including Patients with High-Risk (HR) Disease: New and Updated Results of 116 Patients in a Phase Ib/II Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 189-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Steven Coutre ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 189 Background: BTK is an essential mediator of B-cell receptor signaling in normal and transformed B-cells. Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), an oral inhibitor to BTK, promotes apoptosis and inhibits proliferation, migration and adhesion in CLL cells. Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) treatment approaches such as fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab have markedly improved outcomes of younger, fit patients (pts) as initial or second-line therapy. While effective, fludarabine-based therapy is less well tolerated in the elderly and carries significant risk of cellular immune suppression and myelosupression that limit protracted use. Additionally, virtually all pts eventually relapse after fludarabine-based CIT and effective salvage regimens that induce durable remissions are lacking. Herein, we present mature data from a large (n=116 pts) multi-cohort Phase Ib/II trial of ibrutinib in treatment-naive (TN) or relapsed/refractory (RR) CLL/SLL. Pts experienced a high frequency of disease control extending beyond 22 months in both TN and RR CLL/SLL including those with high risk genomic features. Methods: Pts who were TN (all age >=65 years), RR (>= 2 prior therapies including a purine analog), or high-risk (HR) (relapse within 2 years following combination CIT or del 17p) were enrolled into 5 cohorts evaluating oral ibrutinib at fixed doses of 420mg or 840mg daily until disease progression (PD). Primary objective was to determine the safety of the two dosing regimens. Secondary objectives were to assess efficacy, PK/PD and long-term safety. Overall Response rate (ORR) inclusive of complete and partial responses (CR and PR respectively) was assessed per IWCLL guidelines. In addition, those pts who achieved a PR with the exception of lymphocytosis were categorized as PR with lymphocytosis. Results: The majority of AEs have been Gr ≤ 2 in severity, most commonly diarrhea (54%), fatigue (29%), upper respiratory tract infection (29%), rash (28%), nausea (26%) and arthralgias (25%). Hematologic toxicity ≥ Gr 3 was relatively infrequent. There was no evidence of cumulative toxicity or long-term safety concerns with a median follow-up of 16 months for the 116 treated pts. Treatment discontinuation for AE occurred in 7/116 pts across cohorts. Serial evaluation of serum immunoglobulins revealed a significant increase in IgA at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.005 at each time point) with no decline in IgG or IgM. Responses were observed independent of poor-risk factors including advanced stage disease, prior lines of therapy, b2M, or cytogenetics (e.g. ORR in del 17p R/R (cohorts 1 & 3) 67%). Interestingly, 56/69 relapsed pts with UM IgVH developed treatment related lymphocytosis compared to 11/11 pts with mutated (M) IgVH that resolved more rapidly (median time to normalization 6.2 vs 14.8 months) and normalized more frequently (86% vs 55% P<0.04) compared to those with M IgVH. Estimated 22 month PFS for the 85 RR and HR pts is 76% and for the 31 TN pts is 96%. Estimated 22 month OS for 85 R/R and HR pts is 85% and for the 31 TN pts is 96%. Median PFS and OS have not been met for any of the cohorts including pts with high-risk factors (see Figure- PFS by 17p del status). Conclusions: Ibrutinib monotherapy is highly active, well tolerated, and induces durable remissions in pts with RR CLL including those with high-risk disease and in older TN pts warranting phase III evaluation in these populations. Disclosures: Byrd: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ibrutinib is not approved for the treatment of NHL. Burger:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sharman:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Calistoga: Honoraria; Portola pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Tran:pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clow:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kunkel:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. James:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Brien:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document