High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Analysis from Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Czech Myeloma Group

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4528-4528
Author(s):  
Roman Hajek ◽  
Ivan Spicka ◽  
Vladimir Maisnar ◽  
Tomas Pika ◽  
Evzen Gregora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Monoclonal Gammopathy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 4528 Background: The role of high-dose melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment of Multiple Myeloma (MM) continues to evolve in the era of novel agent. Although data from clinical trials with novel agens are very promising, it is evident that ASCT remains the golden standard for all available patients; moreover combination with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory agens will ensure further benefits and prolongation of overall survival to patients. Aim: To investigate the indication, frequency and results of HDM and ASCT in MM patients in the era of novel agens. Methods: Before inclusion to the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathy (RMG) of the Czech Myeloma Group (CMG), all persons signed the informed consent forms. Out of 1448 newly diagnosed patients (654 aged≤ 65 years) reported in the RMG in the period 2007–2011, 26.7% (386/1448) underwent ASCT as part of primo therapy. A cohort of 229 patients underwent ASCT as part of the first, second and third relapse (R1–3) treatment in the same time period. Time to progression in different disease settings, objective response rate, and safety were included as exploratory outcomes. Efficacy was assed using the IMWG criteria. A distinctive aspect of this analysis involves comparison of frequency of ASCT during this period of time. Results: A total of 59% (386/654) of newly diagnosed patients under 65 years underwent ASCT as part of primo therapy. Frequency of indication between patients with age ≤ 65 years was similar (56–63%) during the last five years. Melphalan 200mg/m2 was the most frequently used HDM (94%) in primo therapy. The same was true for R1 (73%), R2 (46%) but not R3 where most frequent (49%) HDM was melphalan 100mg/m2. Transplant related mortality day+100 ranged between 0.8 to 1.1% during five consecutive years for all treatment settings together and was zero for primo therapy in the year 2007 and 2009–10. Overall responses to ASCT (primo therapy vs. R1 vs. R2 vs. R3) were: ORR 93% (30.5%≥CR) vs. 93% (20%≥CR) vs. 72% (8%≥CR) vs. 54% (4.1%≥CR). Medians of Time to Progression (TTP from the time of ASCT; primo therapy vs. R1 vs. R2 vs. R3) were: 26.2 vs. 15.6 vs. 5.8 vs. 4.8 months and the difference were statistically significant (p<000.1). Conclusion: ASCT is a safe treatment strategy in MM independently of disease advance, although for patients with more advanced disease, reduced dose of melphalan (100mg/m2) should be considered. ASCT is very effective treatment not only for newly diagnosed MM patients but also for patients in the first relapse. The indication in relapse setting should be considered more frequently than is currently common in the shadow of enthusiasm for novel drugs. Acknowledgment: This work was supported by national grants IGA NT12215-4, IGA NT12130-4, GACR P304/10/1395, IGA NT11154-4, MSM 0021622434 Disclosures: Hajek: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maisnar:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer (Schering): Honoraria.

Sequential VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) and VTD (VELCADE®, Thalidomide, Dexamethasone) Induction Followed by High-Dose Therapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Maintenance Treatment with VELCADE for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results of Phase II Trial.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 952-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Hye Jin Kim ◽  
Dong Soon Lee ◽  
Hyeon Seok Eom ◽  
Jun Ho Jang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

Abstract Introduction Effective reduction of myeloma before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prolongs survival in multiple myeloma patients. Recently, incorporation of novel agents resulted in improved response rate and reduced side effect in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Method: Patients are planned to receive 2 cycles of VAD (vincristine 0.4mg D1-4, adriamycin 9mg/m2 D1-4, dexamethasone 40mg D1-4, 9–12 every 3 weeks), and VTD (bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 D1, 4, 8, 11, thalidomide 100mg daily, dexamethasone 40mg D1-4, 9–12 every 3 weeks). High dose melphalan (200mg/m2) is used as a conditioning regimen for ASCT. Bortezomib (1.3mg/m2) as a maintenance treatment is administered weekly x 4 times every 6 weeks for 4 cycles after ASCT. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria, with additional category of nCR. Adverse events were graded by the NCI-CTCAE, Version 3.0. Result: At this interim analysis, 60 patients have been entered into the ongoing trial, and efficacy could be assessed in 53 patients. After 2 cycles of VAD, response rate was 70%. After VTD, two patients showed further improvement with additional CR, and an overall response was 97% with 14% CR. Especially, patients with poor prognostic cytogenetics (n=6) all responded after VTD. So far, autologous stem cells were successfully collected in all 28 patients with a median CD34+ count of 7.8 x 106/kg (range, 2.17–44.7 x 106/kg). In 24 patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation, five patients gained additional CR. There was no progression in patients completed bortezomib maintenance (n=9, CR 77%). The median follow-up duration was 6 months, median time to response was 1.4 months, and median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3,4 hematologic toxicity was more frequently observed after VAD than VTD (anemia 15.8%, 4.6%, neutropenia 7.9%, 3.5%), and incidence of grade 2,3 peripheral neuropathy was low (VAD 3.5%, VTD 7%). Conclusion: Sequential VAD and VTD induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma was highly effective, even in patients with poor prognostic cytogenetics, and did not prejudice stem cell collection. VTD could have contributed to increased RR and minimized side effects. An updated results will be presented at the ASH meeting. *Protocol Number: KMM51-NCT00378755.

Sequential High-Dose Dexamethasone and Response Adapted PAD (Bortezomib, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) or VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) Induction Chemotherapy Followed by High-Dose Chemotherapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma; Open-Labelled, Multicenter Phase 2 Study (KMM-94 Study)-Interim Analysis

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2044-2044
Author(s):  
Jin Seok Kim ◽  
Cheolwon Suh ◽  
June-Won Cheong ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Yang Soo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone

Abstract Abstract 2044 Background: Induction treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard therapy for the newly diagnosed younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Although new drugs such as lenalidomide or bortezomib have been shown the promising results as induction treatment, many different type of induction treatment regimens still have been used. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of the short course of high dose dexamethasone (HD dexa) and the response adapted PAD (Bortezomib, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) or VAD (Vincristine, Adriamycin, Dexamethasone) induction chemotherapy in the newly diagnosed younger patients with MM. Methods: 107 newly diagnosed patients with MM from 21 institutions received 2nd cycles of HD dexa followed by PAD or VAD chemotherapy according to the response to the initial high dose dexamethasone. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) + near CR rate after ASCT. Among 107 patents enrolled this study from November 2009, 25 patients (23%) have been dropped out. This trial will be continued until total 210 patients will be enrolled. The trial is registered on National Cancer Institute website, number NCT01255514. Results: One hundred seven patients (58 male, 49 female) were enrolled (median age; 56). 26 (24%) light chain disease were included. 31 (29%) patients were D-S stage II and 67 (63%) were stage III. According to the ISS, 23 (22%) patients had stage I, 51 (48%) had stage II and 33 (31%) had stage III. 26 (24%) patients had abnormal cytogenetics. There were 31% del13, 7% del17, 19% t(4;14), 15% t(14;16) and 28% t(11;14) in FISH analysis. Among the 82 evaluable patients, CR + PR rate was 48% (39/82) after 2nd cycles of HD dexa therapy. 39 patients (48%) received subsequent VAD chemotherapy and 43 patients (52%) received PAD chemotherapy. Among the 64 patients finished VAD or PAD chemotherapy, CR + PR rate was 83% (79%, 26/33 in VAD group vs. 87%, 27/31 in PAD group). 56 patients were finished ASCT until now. CR + near CR rate after ASCT were 61% (58% in VAD group vs 63% in PAD group). Mortality rate of this trial was 13% (11/82). The cause of death was disease progression (n=3), bleeding (n=1) and infections (n=7). Among 82 patients in whom VAD or PAD chemotherapy was actually performed, 1 year overall survival (OS) rate was 84.7%. 1 year survival rate was 93.8% versus 77.2% (P=0.049) with VAD versus PAD (median follow-up; 9.1 months). Conclusion: Risk adapted approach using initial steroid response showed good response results after ASCT compared with previous trial (CR + near CR rate of IFM 2005-01trial-Bortezomib+dexa induction & ASCT was 35%, J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4621–9) The MM patients who had poor response to HD dexa also showed similar good response rate after ASCT compared with the patients who had good response to HD dexa treatment in this trial. PAD re-induction therapy after failure of initial steroid induction treatment might overcome the inferior results in the high risk MM patients. Therefore, initial steroid response adapted strategy might be the more cost-effective approach in the newly diagnosed ASCT eligible MM patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

High Dose Therapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Vs Standard Dose Chemotherapy In Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3559-3559
Author(s):  
Florian Faußner ◽  
Markus Pfirrmann ◽  
Wolfram Dempke
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Additional Data ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

Abstract Abstract 3559 Introduction. Myeloablative high dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by single autologous stem cell transplantation is currently the standard treatment for patients younger than 65 years in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HDT with standard dose therapy (SDT) have shown some benefit in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), whereas other RCTs did not confirm this finding. Koreth et al. (2007) performed a metaanalysis summarizing the existing data of the RCTs including 2,411 patients. These authors found a significant superiority for HDT in PFS but not in OS. Since a number of new studies have been published recently, we attempted to re-analyze the current data in terms of the endpoints OS and PFS. Methods. We searched PubMed, Embase, abstracts of former ASH meetings and ClinicalTrials.gov as well as bibliographies of included trials and recent reviews from september 2009 until may, 20th 2010. Amongst the 3,484 results in this search we identified 10 RCTs comparing HDT with SDT on an intent-to-treat-basis. Treatment characeristics and outcomes of OS and PFS were calculated using R. Furthermore, we tested for statistical heterogenity, publication bias and performed subgroup analyses. Results. 9 RCTs including 2,600 patients were fully analyzed. Patients undergoing HDT with stem cell transplantation did have significant PFS benefit (Hazard Ratio 0.73; 95% conficence intervall 0.56–0.95; P=0.02) but not OS benefit (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.74–1.10; P=0.32) compared to patients undergoing SDT. Additional data from ongoing clinical trials are expected, thus updated results at the meeting including 10 RCTs with about 3,400 patients will be presented. Conclusion. Although there is only a trend to OS benefit with HDT, it is currently still the first line treatment. Additional data from ongoing clinical trials and new studies using novel agents like thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib are egerly warrented to finally evaluate the role of HDT in the treatment management of patients with newly diagnosed MM. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Immunoparesis Recovery As Predictor Marker of Progression after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4356-4356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Gonzalez De La Calle ◽  
Eduardo Sobejano ◽  
Julio Davila ◽  
Enrique M Ocio ◽  
Noemi Puig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Lymphocyte ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract BACKGROUND High dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care, especially in Europe, for young and eligible multiple myeloma patients (usually younger than 65 years old). Immunoparesis is defined as a reduction (below the lower normal limit) in the levels of 1 or 2 uninvolved immunoglobulins (Ig) and it is related to a reversible suppression of B lymphocytes that correlates inversely with disease stage. B Lymphocyte reconstitution begins at 3 months after ASCT, with maximum B lymphocyte levels at 1 year after ASCT. AIMS The goal of the present study was to investigate the role of the immunoparesis recovery after ASCT as predictor of relapse or progression in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS We reviewed medical records of MM patients who underwent to ASCT at University Hospital of Salamanca between 1992 and 2013. The primary endpoint was time to relapse or progression from ASCT. Ig (Ig G, Ig A e Ig M) were collected at the time of diagnosis, before ASCT, every 3 months during the first year after ASCT, and every year up to 5 years after ASCT among eligible patients until the relapse or disease progression. RESULTS 106 multiple myeloma patients who underwent ASCT were included in the analysis. Conventional chemotherapy was administered as induction regimen in 69 patients (65%), whereas novel agents were used in 37 patients (35%). Most patients had immunoparesis at diagnosis (91%) and at the moment of ASCT as well (94%). After a median follow-up of 62 months, median time to progression or relapse (TTP) from ASCT was 31 months (95 % CI: 24.1 - 37.1 months). MM patients with immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT had a significantly shorter median TTP as compared with patients without immunoparesis (33.5 months vs 94.2 months; HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.13-4.05; p=0.019). In the group of patients with reduction of both Igs, median TTP was slightly inferior than in the group with reduction of only one of them(33.5 vs 36.4 months, p=0.03). Presence of ISS 3, high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis, less than partial response achieved before and three months after ASCT were also identified as predictors of progression. Multivariate analysis selected immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT as an independent variable for relapse or progression (HR: 5.97, 95% CI: 1.63-21.88; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS The lack of immunoparesis recovery at 1 year after ASCT in MM patients is associated with significantly higher risk of relapse or progression and this group of patients could potentially benefit of continuous treatment after ASCT to enhance the immune recovery. Disclosures Ocio: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Puig:The Binding Site: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Mateos:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Consolidation Therapy With Low-Dose Thalidomide and Prednisolone Prolongs the Survival of Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing a Single Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation Procedure

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1788-1793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
H. Miles Prince ◽  
Andrew W. Roberts ◽  
Ian W. Prosser ◽  
Kenneth F. Bradstock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Single High Dose ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Thalidomide is effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, the role of thalidomide in the post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) context remains unclear. This study assessed whether the addition of thalidomide consolidation following ASCT would improve the durability of responses achieved and overall survival. Patients and Methods Between January 2002 and March 2005, 269 patients with newly diagnosed MM who achieved disease stabilization or better with conventional induction chemotherapy received a single high-dose melphalan conditioned ASCT. Post-ASCT, 129 patients were randomly assigned to receive indefinite prednisolone maintenance therapy (control group) and 114 to receive the same in addition to 12 months of thalidomide consolidation (thalidomide group). The primary study end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was tolerability. Results After a median follow-up of 3 years, the postrandomization 3-year PFS rates were 42% and 23% (P < .001; hazard ratio [HR], 0.5; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.71) and the OS rates were 86% and 75% (P = .004; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.76) in the thalidomide and control groups, respectively. There was no difference in survival between groups 12 months after disease progression (79% v 77%; P = .237). Neurological toxicities were more common in the thalidomide arm but there were no differences between arms for thromboembolic events. Conclusion Consolidation therapy with 12 months of thalidomide combined with prednisolone prolongs survival when used after a single high-dose therapy supported ASCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Furthermore, thalidomide consolidation therapy did not adversely impact on survival in the subsequent salvage setting.

scholarly journals Upfront Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Elderly Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1989-1989
Author(s):  
Laurent Garderet ◽  
Cyrille Touzeau ◽  
Anne-Marie Stoppa ◽  
Denis Caillot ◽  
Lionel Karlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Previous trials have shown that autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is superior to conventional chemotherapy in terms of remission rate and PFS in younger MM patients. Concerns about toxicity and potential efficacy of ASCT in older MM patients lead most centers to limit ASCT indications to patients aged <65 years. However, at the era of novel induction regimens, and because of better patient selection and supportive care, ASCT may prove to be a valid treatment option even in older MM patients. Therefore, some investigators are questioning the widely used 65 years age limit. Patients and Methods: We prospectively analyzed the outcomes of 56 consecutive MM patients who had received ASCT between September 2012 and September 2014 in 6 institutions in France (protocol ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01671826). Patients were newly diagnosed MM. For induction therapy, all patients received a bortezomib-based induction regimen (VD, VTD, VCD, or VRD, 4 to 6 cycles) according to center's local guidelines. Mobilization was performed with G-CSF or G-CSF+cyclophosphamide and plerixafor whenever needed. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of either 140 mg/m2 or 200 mg/m2 Melphalan. A short two months consolidation phase post ASCT was allowed (lenalidomide-dexamethasone, VD, VTD, VCD or VRD). No maintenance treatment was given. Response, disease progression and relapse were defined according to the IMWG uniform response criteria. All patients signed an informed consent form according to the EBMT guidelines. Results: At time of diagnosis, median age was 67 (range, 64-74) years with 23% of patients being >70 years. There were 30 males and 26 females. The immunoglobulin subtype was IgG (n=29), IgA (n=15), light chain (n=10), other (n=2). The Salmon and Durie stage was III in 89% of cases (n=47), and the ISS score was I (n=18; 35%), II (n=19; 37%), III (n=14; 27%). Patients had high risk cytogenetics features (t(4;14) and/or del17p) in 9 cases (16%). 10% of patients had a serum creatinine level >176 micromol/L. None of the patients underwent hemodialysis. The Sorror comorbidity score was 0 (34), 1 (6), 2 (2), 3 (6), 6 (1), unknown (7). The median age at time of ASCT was 68 years, and the median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 5 months. In an intention to treat analysis, out of 56 patients, 6 patients could not proceed to ASCT because of an early infectious death (n=1), serious comorbidity (n=2), disease refractoriness to induction (n=1), and failure to collect an adequate PBSC graft (n=2). A median of 5.31x106/Kg CD34+ cells could be collected. Disease status at time of ASCT was: CR (n=12; 24%), VGPR (n=19; 38%), PR (n=17; 34%), and SD/non-responding (n=2; 4%). The conditioning regimen consisted of 140mg/m² melphalan in 18 cases (36%) and 200mg/m2 in 32 patients (64%). Moreover, 4 patients (8%) received a tandem ASCT. The median time for neutrophils and platelets engraftment was 12 days. The day-100 post ASCT non-relapse mortality was 0% and the 2-year NRM was 4.2% (95% CI:[0.3-18.3]). The overall response rate at day 100 was 96% (CR: 34%, VGPR: 47%, PR: 15%, SD/non-responsive: 4%). At 3 months post ASCT, 82% patients were able to receive the planned post ASCT consolidation treatment. After a median follow-up of 12 months, the estimated progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates at 2 years were 76% (95%CI: [61.6-94.1]) and 88% (95%CI: [76.7-100]), respectively. The incidences of infectious complications post ASCT, and response rates were comparable between the two melphalan dose levels (p=0.28). However, in the univariate analysis, the 200 mg/m2 melphalan conditioning group showed a better OS rate compared to the 140 mg/m2 group (1-year OS: 100% vs. 67%; p=0.012). Conclusion: These prospective multicenter results indicate that ASCT is a safe and effective treatment modality for elderly, but fit MM patients at the era of novel induction agents. Of note, patients above age 70 did not experience a worse prognosis. Thus, age per se should not be used as an exclusion criterion for ASCT. Longer follow-up data will be presented, but these results already set the frame for a randomized comparison to the non-transplant approaches in this patients' subgroup. Disclosures Garderet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Touzeau:AbbVie: Research Funding. Stoppa:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Bortezomib plus dexamethasone induction followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: A study from India

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Jeevan Kumar ◽  
Sachin Minhas ◽  
Kamini Khillan ◽  
Manorama Bhargava ◽  
Shyam Aggarwal
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed

Background: The use of novel agents for induction prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has considerably improved the complete response (CR) rate in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. There are very few studies from the developing countries on the use of novel agents followed by ASCT.Aims and Objectives: The current study was aimed for retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and response rates of induction with bortezomib (Velcade) plus dexamethasone (VD regimen) followed by ASCT in Indian patients.Materials and Methods: Ten patients with newly diagnosed, symptomatic MM who had received four cycles of VD induction before stem cell collection were evaluated. High dose melphalan was given for conditioning followed by stem cell transfusion. Thalidomide or lenalidomide was used as post-transplantation maintenance treatment.Results: Post VD induction, the overall response rate (ORR) was 90% including 20% CR, 40% very good partial response (VGPR), and 30% partial response (PR). Post ASCT, the ORR was 100%, including 80% CR and 20% VGPR. The 5-year overall survival and progression free survival rates were 65.6% and 57.1%, respectively.Conclusions: The VD induction regimen was effective and well tolerated in this retrospective analysis of Indian patients with newly diagnosed MM. It significantly improved the post-induction and post-transplant response rates without affecting stem cell collection.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.7(4) 2016 44-48 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document