Phase II Study of Infusional Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Abstract 947 Background: Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a selective, irreversible epoxyketone inhibitor of the chymotrypsin-like activity of both the constitutive proteasome and the immunoproteasome. In patients with multiple myeloma single-agent CFZ is active and well tolerated at doses up to 27 mg/m2 when administered intravenously over 2–10 minutes. Based on preclinical safety data showing that a slower infusion was better tolerated and permitted administration of higher doses than a 2–10 minute infusion, the phase1b/2 PX-171-007 (NCT00531284) study evaluated the administration of CFZ as a 30-minute infusion. That study found the maximally tolerated dose of CFZ given as a 30 minutes infusion to be 56mg/m2. We designed a single institution, phase 2 study of high dose, infusional CFZ in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: CFZ was given as a 30-minute IV infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. Cycle1 Day1–2 doses were 20 mg/m2, followed by escalation to 56mg/m2. Dexamethasone 8 mg was given prior to infusion as premedication to mitigate infusion-related reactions. Patients who did not achieve a partial response (PR) after two cycles of CFZ or initially responded to single agent CFZ, but later showed evidence of progression of disease (POD) had dexamethasone (40mg/week) added to their regimen. Overall response rate (ORR; [sCR + CR + VGPR + PR]) was determined according to International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria. Subjects were evaluated for adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0. Results: Thirty-four patients have been enrolled. Patients had received a median of 5 (range 1–11) prior treatment regimens and included 7 patients who relapsed following allogeneic stem cell transplant. Seventy eight percent of patients were bortezomib-refractory. ORR among patients who completed 4 cycles of therapy or experienced POD prior to completing 4 cycles of therapy was 58% with 1 CR, 7 VGPRs, and 6 PRs. ORR after 4 cycles of therapy was 57% in bortezomib-refractory patients. By intention to treat analysis the ORR in all comers was 50%. Median progression free survival was 4.6 months, median overall survival has not been reached with a median follow-up among survivors of 9.6 months (range: 0.3–14.3 months). The average time to best response was two cycles. Three out of the 11 patients that had dexamethasone 40mg/week added to their regimen obtained an improved response. Twelve patients (35%) were dose reduced. Treatment emergent, non-hematologic Grade 3/4 adverse events for which contribution of CFZ cannot be excluded were: HTN (n = 7), lung infection (n = 6), pulmonary edema (n = 3), reduced ejection fraction (n=1), sepsis (n=2), febrile neutropenia (n=1), bacteremia (n = 1), protothecosis (n = 1), fatigue (n=1), neuropathy (n=1), microangiopathic hemolytic anemia(n=1), nausea/vomiting/+/− diarrhea (n = 2), gastrointestinal bleed in the setting of Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 1), hyperkalemia (n = 1). Conclusions: The 20/56 mg/m2 dose for CFZ administered as a 30-minute IV infusion was associated with 58% ORR, in a heavily pretreated patient population, including 21% of patients w/ prior allogeneic transplant, where the majority of patients were bortezomib-refractory. The ORR from this study is consistent with the one previously reported at the similar dose. Higher doses of carfilzomib continue to be explored in ongoing Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies. Disclosures: Landau: Onyx: Research Funding; Milleneum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hassoun:Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Giralt:Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Milleneum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Feasibility and Activity Of Bortezomib-Based Therapy In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Carfilzomib

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1994.1994 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1994-1994

Author(s):

Arti Alagappan ◽

Rupin A Shah ◽

Sheeba K. Thomas ◽

Donna M. Weber ◽

Michael Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Proteasome Inhibitor ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Response

Abstract Introduction Carfilzomib (Car) is a proteasome inhibitor (PI) that was recently approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. It is indicated for patients (pts) who previously received the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Bz) and an immunomodulatory drug (thalidomide or lenalidomide (len)) and had disease refractory to the last line of therapy. With the increasing number of therapeutic options, the optimal sequencing strategy of PIs to maximize clinical benefit and patient outcomes is unclear. The objective of our study was to therefore evaluate the activity of Bz after Car exposure. Methods Pts who enrolled and received Carfilzomib-based therapy on clinical trials at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were screened for subsequent Bz therapy. Carfilzomib was administered as a single agent, or with len/dexamethasone (dex). We evaluated the overall response and tolerability of Bz pre- and post-Car, and to Car-based therapy. Results 16 pts were identified with a mean age of 67 (range 48-85), including 11 women and 5 men. ISS stage was I in 10 pts, stage II in 1, and stage III in 5. Median lines of therapy prior to Car were 3 (1-9), and 11 pts had prior stem cell transplant. Prior to Car-based therapy, 5 pts were Bz naïve, 7 were Bz sensitive, and 4 were Bz intolerant. Among the 16 patients treated with Car as a single agent, or Car in combination with dex (n=1), len/dex (n=12), panobinostat (n=2) and pomalidomide/dex (n=1) the overall response rate (ORR) to Car-based therapy on protocol (≥MR) was 75% (12/16). Among the 16 pts who subsequently received Bz after Car, 4 patients remained sensitive to Car (2/4 were Bz naïve), 5 were intolerant to Car, and 7 were Car refractory (3/7 were Bz naïve). Patients received Bz in combination with various other therapeutics, including cyclophosphamide/dex (n=5), melphalan/dex (n=2), modified-CVAD (n=3), len/dex (n=5), pegylated doxorubicin/dex (n=7) and bendamustine (n=3). The ORR to Bz-based therapy after Car was 81% (13/16). Among the 7 patients who were refractory to Car, 5/7 patients had ≥MR to Bz based therapy, while 2 patients were Bz intolerant due to rash and neutropenia. Among the 13 pts who responded to Bz after Car, 10 patients had received prior Bz. 3/5 pts who were Bz naïve had ≥MR. 4/4 patients who were intolerant to prior Bz had ≥MR, and 6/7 Bz sensitive patients had ≥MR. Discussion Bortezomib-based therapy is feasible after carfilzomib exposure in patients including those who were previously intolerant to bortezomib. The ORR(≥MR) in this patient population to Bz-based therapy was 81%. Disclosures: Thomas: Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Orlowski:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Resverlogix: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of the Novel Kinesin Spindle Protein Inhibitor ARRY-520 + Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4082.4082 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4082-4082 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Donna M. Weber ◽

Sheeba K. Thomas ◽

Raymond Alexanian ◽

Michael Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Kinesin Spindle Protein

Abstract Abstract 4082 Background: ARRY-520, a novel kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor, has been studied as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone, and demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients with bortezomib- and lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, a novel irreversible proteasome inhibitor (PI), has also demonstrated single agent activity in relapsed and refractory MM, and recently received regulatory approval for this indication. Preclinical data support the presence of synergy with the combination of a PI and a KSP inhibitor via the latter's ability to down-regulate Mcl-1, supporting our hypothesis that the combination of carfilzomib and ARRY-520 (Car-ARRY) would be highly active in relapsed and/or refractory myeloma. We therefore aimed to combine these two agents for the first time, and here report the initial findings from the phase I dose-escalation in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety/tolerability of the Car-ARRY combination. Secondary objectives were to determine efficacy as measured by the overall response rate, time to progression, progression free survival and time to next therapy. Patients had to have myeloma that was relapsed and/or refractory, be ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant, bortezomib refractory/intolerant, and prior lenalidomide exposure. ARRY-520 was administered intravenously over 1 hour on days 1, 2, 15 and 16, while carfilzomib was administered intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 on a 28 day cycle. All patients received growth factor support with filgrastim. Dose-escalation used a standard 3+3 schema proceeded based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycle 1, with planned escalation of the dose of ARRY-520. Dose level 1 was ARRY-520 0.75 mg/m2, and carfilzomib was dosed at 20 mg/m2 for cycle 1 on days 1 and 2 and all subsequent dose were at 27 mg/m2. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4, while responses were assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: To date, 8 patients have been enrolled in the ongoing dose escalation phase. The median age was 66 (range 47–80), 6/8 were males, and the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2–10). 7/8 patients had undergone prior autologous stem cell transplant, and all patients were bortezomib refractory or intolerant. In the first cohort, 3 patients were enrolled and no dole limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. During the second cohort, ARRY-520 was escalated to 1 mg/m2 with carfilzomib at 20/27 mg/m2, and among the first 3 patients, one patient suffered a DLT in the form of an admission for influenza pneumonia with non-neutropenic fever. Expansion of cohort 2 is currently underway. Among the 6 patients who completed the first cycle of therapy, 5 remain on study. In the first cohort, one patient remains on study with 6 cycles and achieved a near complete remission, 1 patient achieved stable disease, and 1 patient suffered disease progression after first cycle. In the second cohort, all three patients who completed the first cycle have stable disease and remain on trial. In the first 6 toxicity-evaluable patients who have completed one cycle, grade (G) 3 events included one each of pneumonia, diarrhea, and hyperglycemia. There was limited hematologic toxicity with 4/6 patients with G1/2 thrombocytopenia, 3/6 patients with G1/2 anemia, and 1/6 patient with G1/2 neutropenia. Additional G1/2 non-hematologic toxicity included 3/6 patients with diarrhea, 3/6 patients with dyspnea, 3/6 patients with transient elevations in creatinine and 3/6 patients with aspartate aminotransferase elevations. An MTD has not been established and enrollment is ongoing in cohort 2 with carfilzomib at 20/27mg/m2 and ARRY-520 at 1.0 mg/m2. Conclusions: The combination of ARRY-520 and carfilzomib is well tolerated with limited hematologic toxicity and a manageable side effect profile. Notably, in this patient population, with patients who have bortezomib refractory/intolerant myeloma, the combination has demonstrated early signals of activity. Updated safety and efficacy data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: This presentation will include information about Arry-520 which is not yet approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma. Wang:Pharmacyclic: Research Funding; onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hilder:Array BioPharma: Employment. Orlowski:onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; array biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label Phase I Study of the Safety and Efficacy of RAD001 in Combination with Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3856.3856 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3856-3856 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Noopur Raje ◽

Paul Richardson ◽

Parameswaran N Hari ◽

Anuj Mahindra ◽

Sarah Kaster ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Oral Steroid ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3856 Poster Board III-792 Background Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients following ≥1 prior therapy. mTOR inhibitor RAD001 has been studied as a single agent in MM, and although well tolerated, did not have single agent activity. Given the increased toxicity noted with pulsed high dose steroids, we sought to study a non-steroid containing oral regimen for the treatment of relapsed MM predicated upon our previous studies which demonstrated synergistic anti-MM activity of mTOR inhibitors when combined with len. Here, we extended our in vitro observations to a phase I clinical trial combining RAD001 with len in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The primary objective was to assess toxicity of this combination and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary objective was to determine the activity of this combination. Methods Patients with relapsed and refractory MM were assigned to len and RAD001 to be taken for 21 days of a 28 day cycle. Dose escalation followed a modified Fibonacci design. Patients were allowed to continue therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients received concomitant anti-thrombotic (aspirin 81 or 325 mg/day) therapy. Response was assessed according to modified EBMT and Uniform Criteria, and toxicities were assessed using NCI CTCAE v3.0. Results Eighteen MM patients have been enrolled to date. One patient in cohort 1 (Len: 10mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) developed grade 3 neutropenia requiring expansion of the cohort. Cohort 2 (Len: 15mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) also required expansion because of grade 4 thrombocytopenia noted in 1 patient. Dose limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 2/3 patients in cohort 3 (Len: 20mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days). The MTD for patients with MM was therefore declared at 15 mg of len and 5mg of RAD001 for 21 days with a 7 day rest period. Apart from the hematological toxicities expected with the combination, patients otherwise tolerated the regimen well. Most common (≥10%) grade 1 / 2 events included nausea, fatigue, dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, neuropathy and muscle cramps, all of which were manageable with supportive care. No thromboembolic events were noted. Grade 3 / 4 adverse events ≥ 5% included thrombocytopenia (11%) and neutropenia (22%). Fifteen patients have finished at least 2 cycles of therapy: 8 of 15 patients have either stable disease (SD: 1), minimal response (MR: 5) or a partial response (PR: 2), including 7 of 9 patients treated at the recommended MTD for an overall response rate (MR or better) of 50% (90% CI: [30.76%]). One patient with SD continued therapy for a total of 10 cycles, without significant toxicities. Conclusions The combination of Len plus RAD001 is a well tolerated regimen with predictable hematological toxicities. Promising responses were noted in this heavily pretreated patient population. This combination provides an oral steroid free combination alternative strategy which warrants future evaluation in phase II studies. Disclosures: Raje: Astrazeneca : Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: RAD001 not labelled for use in myeloma. Richardson:Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hari:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Laubach:Novartis:. Ghobrial:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Adams:Novartis: Employment. Makrides:Celgene: Employment.

Download Full-text

Phase 1b Results of a Phase 1b/2 Study of Obinutuzmab, Ibrutinib, and Venetoclax in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.639.639 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 639-639 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Jeffrey A. Jones ◽

Jennifer Woyach ◽

Farrukh T. Awan ◽

Kami J. Maddocks ◽

Thomas Whitlow ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Objective Response ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Once Daily ◽

Phase 1B

Abstract BACKGROUND Venetoclax(VEN), a once daily oral inhibitor of BCL2, has demonstrated high response rates and acceptable toxicity in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL both as a single agent and in combination with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab and obinutuzumab (formerly GA-101, G), where minimal residual disease (MRD) negative responses have been observed in the majority of patients. Ibrutinib (IBR), a once daily oral inhibitor of the Brutontyrosine kinase, likewise induces remissions in the majority of treated patients, but complete response (CR) is uncommon even after prolonged administration. Early genetic studies have demonstrated that BCL2 over-expression rescues BTK deficient XID murine B-cells from spontaneous apoptosis (J Immunol 1996), so we hypothesized that combination therapy would more efficiently achieve deep response endpoints. We report phase 1b results of a single-institution phase 1b/2 study of G, IBR, and VEN to characterize the safety and preliminary efficacy of the combination. METHODS Patients with CLL relapsed after or refractory to ≥1 prior therapy and who required treatment were eligible. Enrolled patients had ECOG ≤1 and preserved end-organ function, including creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min/m2. Patients with chronic viral hepatitis infection, uncontrolled autoimmunecytopenia, active Richter transformation, and known cysteine-481 BTK mutation or clinical disease progression during treatment with a cysteine-481-binding BTK inhibitor were excluded. G, IBR, and VEN were started sequentially over the first 3 of fourteen 28-day cycles as detailed in the table. To establish the safety of VEN in combination with OBIN and IBR, VEN dose was escalated in 3 x 3 cohorts (100, 200, 400 mg) to a maximum planned dose of 400 mg daily. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined during the third cycle. Risk assessment for VEN dose ramp-up was conducted according to US prescribing information. Adverse events were assessed and graded using CTCAE v4.03. Response assessment according to IWCLL 2008 criteria, including bone marrow biopsy with 4-colorimmunophenotyping of marrow and peripheral blood (PB) for MRD, occurs after cycles 8 and 14. RESULTS Twelve R/R patients have been treated in the phase 1b portion of the trial. Median age was 57 years (range: 42-70) and median prior therapies was 1 (range: 1-7). Baseline genetic risk features includedunmutatedIGHV in 11 (92%),del(17p) in 1 (8%), del(11q) in 8 (67%), and complex abnormal karyotype in 5 (42%) patients. Tumor lysis (TLS) risk was low in 1 (8%), medium in 7 (58%), and high in 4 (33%) patients at study entry. In general, observed toxicities for the combination were consistent with those reported for the single agents. DLTs were not observed at any VEN dose level, establishing VEN 400 mg daily as safe in combination with standard doses of G and IBR. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (regardless of attribution) were neutropenia (50%), lymphopenia (33%),hypertension(25%), and fatigue (17%). Grade 1/2 adverse events occurring in over half the patients included bruising (all grade 1, 83%), infusion related reaction (75%), hypertension (67%), headache (67%), hyperuricemia (all grade 1, 75%), hypocalcemia (75%), and diarrhea (all grade 1, 67%), AST and/or ALT elevation (58%), and rash (50%). No cases of either clinical or laboratory TLS were observed. All patients remain on therapy and 6 have reached response assessment after completing 8 cycles of therapy. All 6 have achieved objective response: 5 PR, including 1 MRD-negative in PB (VEN 100) and 1 MRD-negative in both PB and marrow (VEN 100), and 1 CR with MRD-negative PB and marrow (VEN 200). CONCLUSIONS G, IBR, and VEN can be safely administered in combination at doses standard for the treatment of CLL. DLTs were not observed, establishing VEN 400 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose in combination with G and IBR. Adverse events were manageable and largely consistent with those reported in the single agent phase 2 studies. Objective responses, including MRD-negative responses, have been observed among all R/R patients from the first dose cohorts. Accrual continues to parallel phase 2 cohorts of R/R (n=25) and TN (n=25) patients. Updated phase 1b toxicity and response data will be presented. Table. Table. Disclosures Jones: Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Awan:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis Oncology: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Belantamab in Combination with Dexamethasone in Patients with Triple-Class Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149791 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1642-1642

Author(s):

Tahani Atieh ◽

Shebli Atrash ◽

Meera Mohan ◽

Leyla Shune ◽

Zahra Mahmoudjafari ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Median Number ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Background Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remains a major challenge. With each relapse, patients (pts) experience decreased response duration leading to shortened survival. Pts with triple-class refractory disease (refractory to one class of the following: immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PI) and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody) have a poor prognosis. Belantamab mafodotin is a first-in class B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibody-drug conjugate. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of belantamab/dexamethasone (Bd) in triple-class RRMM. Patients & Methods Twenty-eight pts with triple-class RRMM receiving Bd were identified at University of Kansas Health System between October 2019 and June 2021 and reviewed retrospectively. These pts received belantamab 2.5 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks and dexamethasone (20-40) mg PO weekly. Descriptive analyses were performed on available data for patient characteristics. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Maier method. Responses were evaluated using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Results The median age was 67 yrs (42-85). Eleven pts (39%) had IgG isotype, 14 pts (50%) had R-ISS stage III disease, 20 pts (71%) had high-risk cytogenetics, and 13 pts (46%) had extramedullary disease (EMD). Patients characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Median number of Bd cycles received was 3 (2-18). The median number of previous lines of therapy was 5 (3-15). All pts were triple-class refractory, whereas 15 pts (54%) were penta-refractory. Twenty-one pts (75%) received autologous stem cell transplant, and 8 pts (29%) had previously received BCMA-targeted therapy. The response rate for all pts was 46% with 18% achieving very good partial response and better. Median follow-up was 7.4 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months, while median overall survival (OS) was 7.4 months. The response rates are summarized in Table 2. Keratopathy was one of the most common adverse events (AEs), occurring in 23 (82%) pts, 13 (56%) pts had grade 3 or 4 keratopathy. Nineteen patients (68%) required dose reduction or delay due to keratopathy. Other common AEs included: anemia (83%), thrombocytopenia (70%), neutropenia (30%), and elevated liver function tests (53%). Eighteen patients (64%) discontinued due to progression of disease or death. No treatment-related mortality was noted in this review. Conclusion Our analysis demonstrates a reasonable efficacy of Bd in those who are heavily treated triple-class RRMM patients in the real world. Keratopathy remains a challenging AE and the main cause of dose reduction and delay. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Atrash: AMGEN: Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Research Funding. Mahmoudjafari: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McGuirk: Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

PX-171-004, An Ongoing Open-Label, Phase II Study of Single-Agent Carfilzomib (CFZ) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Myeloma (MM); Updated Results From the Bortezomib-Treated Cohort.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.303.303 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 303-303 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

David Siegel ◽

Luhua Wang ◽

Robert Z Orlowski ◽

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

A. Keith Stewart ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Insufficiency ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Ortho Biotech ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 303 Background: Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a novel proteasome inhibitor that binds its target selectively and irreversibly, resulting in greater and more sustained proteasomal inhibition compared to BTZ (Demo et al, Cancer Res 2007). CFZ overcomes BTZ-resistance in vitro (Kuhn et al, Blood 2007) and in a previous Phase 2 study (PX-171-003), single-agent CFZ achieved durable responses and maintained disease control [e.g. ≥ Stable Disease (SD)] in patients with progressive multiple myeloma (MM) despite treatment with essentially all available agents. PX-171-004 is an ongoing Phase 2 study of CFZ monotherapy in MM patients with relapsed or refractory disease following 1–3 prior therapies. Here we report updated data for the BTZ-treated cohort. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory (defined as < 25% response or disease progression during therapy) MM were enrolled and stratified based on prior BTZ exposure (e.g. BTZ-naïve and BTZ-treated). For the BTZ-treated cohort, tolerability and response to prior BTZ [≥ Minor Response (MR)] was not required. CFZ 20 mg/m2 IV was administered on Days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 every 28 days, for up to 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was Overall Response Rate (ORR) [≥ Partial Response (PR)] by IMWG criteria. Secondary endpoints included Clinical Benefit Response (CBR = ORR + MR) and safety. Results: Thirty-five BTZ-treated patients were enrolled. Six (17%) patients had previously received BTZ exclusively as a single agent, 15 (43%) received BTZ as part of a chemotherapy combination and 10 (29%) received BTZ as part of a stem cell transplant (SCT) regimen. An additional 4 (11%) received BTZ in a chemotherapy combination as well as part of a separate transplant regimen. Other prior therapies included alkylators (89%), SCT (81%), thalidomide (69%), lenalidomide (37%), and anthracyclines (31%). Six (17%) patients had disease refractory to BTZ and 9 (26%) additional patients had discontinued BTZ due to toxicities. At baseline, 19 (54 %) patients had an ECOG score ≥ 1, 17 (49%) patients had neuropathy of Grade ≥ 1, 9 (26%) patients had impaired renal function (CrCl <60 mL/min) and 9 (26%) had diabetes. The median time since diagnosis was 3.6 years (range 1.2–13.2). To date, the mean number of CFZ doses administered was 29.3 (∼5 four-week cycles; range 4–72 doses, 0.7–12 cycles). Thirty-three patients who initiated therapy were evaluable for response per protocol. The ORR was 18% (6/33), including 1 CR and 5 PRs. An additional 4 (12%) patients had MR (CBR= 30%) and 13 (39%) had SD for ≥ 6 weeks. For evaluable patients who were either refractory or intolerant to their prior BTZ therapy, responses to CFZ included 1 PR and 1 MR and 8 SDs. The most common adverse events (AEs) (≥ 30% patients) were primarily Grades 1/2 and included fatigue (57%), nausea (54%), vomiting (37%), dyspnea (34%), diarrhea (34%), anemia (31%), increased creatinine (31%) and upper respiratory tract infection (31%). Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in ≥ 10% of patients were anemia (14.3%) and neutropenia (11.4%). There were no reports of febrile neutropenia. Dose modifications were rarely required. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) was uncommon (4 patients, 11%); only 1 patient had a Grade 3 event that lasted < 36 hours and did not result in missed doses or dose modification. None of the 9 patients with baseline renal impairment were discontinued for renal AEs. To date, 6 (17%) patients have completed the full 12-cycle protocol at the initial dose and schedule, 6 (17%) remain on study and 1 patient has received > 19 cycles on a recently initiated extended treatment protocol. Conclusions: In a BTZ-exposed population that includes BTZ treatment failures and significant comorbidities (e.g. diabetes, renal insufficiency, etc), the 18% ORR (CBR 30%) is notable for this steroid- and anthracycline-sparing regimen. Single-agent CFZ is well tolerated, even in patients with renal insufficiency, and both myelosuppression and PN are uncommon. These data support the continuing evaluation of CFZ as a safe and effective treatment option in MM. Disclosures: Siegel: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Wang:Proteolix, Inc.: Research Funding. Stewart:Genzyme, Celgene, Millenium, Proteolix: Honoraria; Takeda, Millenium: Research Funding; Takeda-Millenium, Celgene, Novartis, Amgen: Consultancy. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Jakubowiak:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McDonagh:Proteolix: Research Funding. Belch:Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Le:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Kunkel:Proteolix: Consultancy, Employment. Bennett:Proteolix: Employment. Kauffman:Proteolix, Inc.: Employment. Vij:Proteolix, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Updated Results of a Phase I Study of RAD001 In Combination with Lenalidomide In Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma with Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3051.3051 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3051-3051 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Anuj Mahindra ◽

Paul G Richardson ◽

Parameswaran Hari ◽

Aliyah R. Sohani ◽

Jacob P. Laubach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

T Cell Subsets ◽

Oral Steroid ◽

Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3051 Background: Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients following ≥1 prior therapy. RAD001, an mTOR inhibitor has been studied as a single agent in MM, and although well tolerated, did not have single agent activity. Informed by our previous studies demonstrating synergistic anti-MM activity of mTOR inhibitors when combined with Len, we studied this combination to evaluate its safety and activity as a non-steroid containing oral regimen in advanced MM. Methods: Patients with relapsed and refractory MM were assigned to Len and RAD001 to be taken for 21 days of a 28 day cycle (NCT00729638) in a standard 3+3 design. Patients were allowed to continue therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity and were required to receive concomitant anti-thrombotic (aspirin 81 or 325 mg/day) therapy. Peripheral blood and bone marrow samples were collected before and after treatment for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. Results: Twenty-eight patients were registered on the trial between December 2008-December 2009. Two patients were inevaluable because of either rapidly progressive disease or failure to meet eligibility criteria on day 1. Data on 26 patients are therefore available. Pts had received a median of 4 prior lines of treatment.14 pts had received Len previously of which 11 pts had relapsed disease and 3 pts had relapsed/refractory disease. Both cohort 1 (Len: 10mg/day and RAD001: 5mg/every other day ×21 days of 28 day cycle) and 2 (Len: 15mg/day and RAD001: 5mg daily ×21 days of 28 day cycle) required expansion because of grade 3 neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Dose limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 2/3 patients in cohort 3 (Len: 20mg and RAD001: 5 mg × 21 days). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was therefore declared at 15 mg of len and 5mg of RAD001 for 21 days with a 7 day rest period. Most common (≥10%) Grade 1/2 events included nausea, fatigue, dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, neuropathy and muscle cramps, all of which proved manageable with supportive care. One patient developed RAD related non-infectious pneumonitis requiring therapy discontinuation. Grade 3/4 adverse events (≥ 5%) included thrombocytopenia (11%) and neutropenia (22%). Nineteen patients completed 2 cycles and were evaluable for response. Median follow up is currently 8.7 months and median PFS is 4.3 months, with 12 patients receiving treatment at MTD. Overall response rate was 68% (13/19) (90% CI: [30-76%]) including CR(1) PR(2), MR(8) and SD(2). Four patients continue on the combination at 13, 14, 15 and 17 months respectively. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data including immunohistochemistry for phosphorylated AKT, cytokine profiles, T cell subsets and transcription profile on MM cell pre and post treatment as well as correlation of response with pharmacodynamic studies will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of Len plus RAD001 is a well tolerated regimen with predictable hematological toxicities. Promising responses were noted in this heavily pretreated patient population with advanced MM. This combination thus provides an oral steroid free combination treatment strategy which warrants future evaluation in phase II studies. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Adams:Novartis: Employment. Makrides:Celgene: Employment. Munshi:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Raje:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide and RAD 001 for treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Download Full-text

Prolonged Survival and Improved Response Rates With ARRY-520 In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients With Low α-1 Acid Glycoprotein (AAG) Levels: Results From a Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.285.285 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 285-285 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Sagar Lonial ◽

Jatin J. Shah ◽

Jeffrey Zonder ◽

William I. Bensinger ◽

Adam D. Cohen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Mechanisms Of Action ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Baseline

Abstract Background The availability of multiple immunomodulators (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs) has resulted in improved outcomes for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). Pts refractory to these 2 classes of drugs have a poor prognosis and new drugs with novel mechanisms of action are needed. ARRY-520, a potent, selective inhibitor of the novel drug target KSP, has shown single-agent activity in MM. The acute-phase protein AAG can bind ARRY-520, reducing free drug, possibly resulting in reduced treatment effect in pts with high AAG. Methods ARRAY-520-212 is a Phase 1/2 study. The Phase 2 portion was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1.5 mg/m2/day ARRY-520 administered intravenously on Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks with filgrastim support. 2 Cohorts have been enrolled: Cohort 1 investigated single-agent ARRY-520 in pts with relapsed or refractory MM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, including both bortezomib (BTZ) and an IMiD. Cohort 2 (cohort2) investigated ARRY-520 with Low-dose dexamethasone (LoDex -40mg weekly) in pts with RRMM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy, refractory (progression on or within 60 days of last treatment) to last line of therapy, and refractory to BTZ, lenalidomide (Len) and dexamethasone (triple-refractory). Pts intolerant to Len or BTZ were not included in cohort2. Baseline plasma AAG levels were measured in both cohorts. Results Results are summarized in the attached table. In cohort 1, 32 pts have been treated, with a median age of 65 years and a median of 6 prior regimens. 41% of cohort 1 pts were refractory to BTZ and Len. 6/27 pts (22%) had high baseline AAG. In cohort 2, 50 pts have been treated to date, with a median age of 63 years and a median of 9 prior regimens. As described in the table, cohort 2 pts had more prior treatment regimens, were primarily triple refractory and had a short time to progression (TTP) on prior therapy. 13/44 (30%) of cohort 2 pts had high baseline AAG. ARRY-520 showed a similar safety profile in both Cohorts. The most commonly reported (≥ 10% of pts) treatment-emergent Grade 3/4 adverse events, regardless of attribution, were thrombocytopenia (44% cohort 1, 42% cohort 2), anemia (38% and 50%), neutropenia (38% and 38%), fatigue (16% and 8%), leukopenia (13 and 4%) and pneumonia (3% and 12%). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was low in both cohorts (3% and 6%). ARRY-520 has shown activity both alone and with LoDex (See table). To date, in both cohorts, pts with High AAG have had no objective responses as compared to pts with Low AAG. In the completed cohort 1, ARRY-520 showed a durable 16% overall response rate (ORR) with an 8.6 month (mo) duration of response. In pts with Low AAG a prolonged OS (median = 23 mo) was observed compared to pts with High AAG (OS = 4.5 mo). Follow-up in cohort 2 is ongoing and ARRY-520+LoDex has shown a 16% ORR to date in this very heavily pretreated population. Notably in cohort 2, 4 PR were observed in the 16 patients (25%) who were previously treated with either a novel PI (carfilzomib or MLN9708) and/or IMiD (pomalidomide). Conclusions ARRY-520 is a novel first-in class agent in MM. In this Phase 2 analysis, ARRY-520 showed a similar activity and safety profile both alone and in combination with LoDex. While transient non-cumulative neutropenia is observed, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was low. ARRY-520 showed clear activity both alone and in combination with LoDex. Activity in pts refractory to novel PI and IMiDs suggests a lack of cross-resistance with drugs with existing mechanisms of action. High levels of AAG are associated with a lack of tumor responses and shorter OS following treatment with ARRY-520, suggesting AAG may be a potential patient selection marker identifying pts unlikely to benefit from ARRY-520. Disclosures: Lonial: Millennium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Off Label Use: ARRY-520 (Investigational Drug). Shah:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zonder:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Skyline Diagnostics: Consultancy. Kaufman:Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Hilder:Array BioPharma: Employment. Rush:Array BioPharma: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma: Employment. Walker:Array BioPharma: Employment. Orlowski:Array Biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Resverlogix: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Carfilzomib at 56mg/m2 with Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (K56Cd) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Followed By ASCT or K56Cd Consolidation: Initial Results of the Phase 2 Cardamon Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127992 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 861-861 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Kwee Yong ◽

Rakesh Popat ◽

William Wilson ◽

Gavin Pang ◽

Richard Jenner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Standard Risk

Introduction: Carfilzomib (20/36mg/m2) triplets with Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRd), or Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone (KCd) are safe and effective in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma(NDMM). The higher dose of 56mg/m2 is effective as a doublet with Dexamethasone in the relapsed setting, but there is limited data on this dose in triplet combinations in the frontline setting. Aim: The CARDAMON study evaluated KCd with bi-weekly carfilzomib (56mg/m2) as induction in NDMM patients, and the benefit of ASCT versus K56Cd consolidation followed by carfilzomib maintenance. Co-primary endpoints were major response (≥VGPR rate) to 4 induction cycles of K56Cd, and 2-year PFS for ASCT versus K56Cd consolidation. Here we report interim analysis of the first primary endpoint of ≥VGPR rate to K56Cd induction. Methods: Transplant eligible ND patients received 4 x 28d cycles of K56Cd (carfilzomib:20/56mg/m2, IV d1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, cyclophosphamide 500mg orally d1, 8, 15 and dexamethasone 20mg d1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16). Responding patients with a successful stem cell harvest (PBSCH) were randomised to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or 4 more cycles of K56Cd as consolidation, followed by 18 months carfilzomib maintenance (K56 days 1, 8, 15) for both arms. Trial recruitment completed in July 2019. Response was assessed by IMWG criteria; all patients had MRD testing by multi-parameter flow cytometry (10-5) after PBSCH. Adverse risk genetics was any one of t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14,20) or del(17p). Results: 281 pts were registered between 06/2015 and 07/2019; we report outcomes for 252 patients who either completed induction or came off study before end of induction. Median age was 58yrs(33-74), 91% ECOG 0-1, 45.2% ISS I, 24.7% adverse risk (48.5% when including 1p/1q+). Best response at end of induction or after PBSCH (n=250) was: ≥VGPR 59.2%, ORR 87.6%. ≥VGPR rate in adverse risk patients was 53.4% vs 61.9% in standard risk(SR), (p=0.25), ORR was similar: adverse risk, 87.9% vs standard risk, 88.1%. Post-PBSCH, 24.1% of patients were MRD-negative (patients who were withdrawn due to insufficient induction response or toxicity and those with an inconclusive result were grouped with the MRD-positive). Of 19 patients in sCR/CR, 9 were MRD-negative(47.4%) while 40/110 (36.4%) of VGPR patients were MRD-negative. MRD-negative rates in adverse and standard risk patients were 22.8% and 24.7% respectively. 10 patients progressed during or at end of induction, and 12 were withdrawn for toxicity. There were 4 deaths during induction, one from myocardial infarction, the other 3 from cardiac arrest, associated with bronchopneumonia and sepsis. During induction, 114 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 72/252 patients, notable ones were thrombotic microangiopathy (2), grade 3 cardiac ischaemia (4), infection (16.3%, mainly lung), renal impairment (6), G3 hypertension (3), thromboembolism(2). Specific guidance for hypertension management was incorporated. 25% of patients are currently reported to have received a dose modification during induction. Full details of adverse events and dose intensity will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: K56Cd is an effective induction regimen in NDMM patients, and has equivalent MRD negative rates in adverse and standard risk disease. The SAE profile is in keeping with published safety data with carfilzomib. Disclosures Yong: Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Consultancy; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Popat:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses. Ramasamy:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; NAPP Pharmaceuticals Ltd.: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag Ltd.: Research Funding; Oncopeptides and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chapman:Takeda: Honoraria. Benjamin:Allogene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Servier: Research Funding; Eusapharm: Consultancy. Owen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/ meeting support. OffLabel Disclosure: Carfilzomib is used with cyclophosphamide as 1st line treatment for myeloma

Download Full-text

A Phase Ib/II Study of the Novel Anti-CXCR4 Antibody Ulocuplumab (BMS-936564) in Combination with Lenalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone, or with Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117773 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3263-3263

Author(s):

Irene M. Ghobrial ◽

Chia-Jen Liu ◽

Raymond P. Perez ◽

Paul Richardson ◽

Kenneth C. Anderson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Cross Resistance ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Oral Dexamethasone ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor overexpressed in more than 20 tumor types, including malignant plasma cells. The CXCR4/CXCL12 (SDF-1) axis has been known for many years as a critical regulator of tumor proliferation, cell, as well as migration into and out of the bone marrow. Ulocuplumab (BMS- 936564) is a first in class, fully human IgG4 monoclonal anti-CXCR4 antibody which inhibits the binding of CXCR4 to CXCL12. This study aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of Ulocuplumab alone and in combination with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Len-Dex), or in combination with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Bor-Dex) in subjects with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Patients / Methods: Patients were eligible for this trial if they were 18 years of age or older with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after having received at least 2 prior lines of treatment. Patients in whom who both lenalidomide and bortezomib had failed were not excluded from re-treatment with the same regimen. Patients were enrolled at four cancer centers in the U.S. from October 2011 to March 2014. Ulocuplumab (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) was dose escalated with a 3-plus-3 design with doses of Len-Dex or Bor-Dex to identify maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Ulocuplumab was given weekly in combination with either 25mg lenalidomide on days 1-21 and 40mg oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of the 28-day cycles on Arm A or 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and 20mg oral dexamethasone on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of the 21-day cycles on Arm B since cycle 2. The primary endpoints for this study were dose-limiting toxicities. Other key safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events (AE), AEs leading to discontinuation, SAEs, deaths, and laboratory abnormalities. The efficacy endpoints included overall responses, duration of response, and time to response. Responses were assessed using the IMWG criteria. Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled (median age, 60 years; range, 53-67). The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1-11), with 70.0% of patients having received ≥ 3 lines of treatment. Ulocuplumab was escalated to a maximum of 10 mg/kg without reaching MTD. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were neutropenia (13 patients, 43.3%), diarrhea (10 patients, 33.3%), thrombocytopenia (10 patients, 33.3%), and fatigue (7 patients, 23.3%) in Arm A; and thrombocytopenia (6 patients, 37.5%), fatigue (4 patients, 25.0%) and anemia (4 patients, 25.0%) in Arm B. The overall response rate (≥ partial response) for all subjects in escalation and expansion was 44.4% (20/45). The median time to response was 1.5 months (range 0.4-7.8 months) for Arm A and 1.0 month (range 0.5-3.7 months) for Arm B, respectively. Of note, the combination of Ulocuplumab with Len-Dex showed a high response rate of 55.2% and a clinical benefit rate ( ≥ minimal response) of 72.4%, including patients who have been previously treated with lenalidomide. Conclusion: This study shows that the blockade of the CXCR4-CXCL12 axis by Ulocuplumab is safe and has an encouraging response rate of over 50% in the Len-Dex arm of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. The distinct mechanisms of action of this antibody, as well as its non- cross resistance with currently approved approaches, make it a new class of anti-myeloma drug that warrants further exploration and evaluation in future clinical trials. Disclosures Ghobrial: Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Richardson:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership. Becker:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text