Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation - A Long-Term Curative Approach In Patients ≥ 60 Years With Advanced Disease AML/MDS, - The Freiburg Experience Of 250 Consecutive Patients
Abstract Since the introduction of reduced-toxicity conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) we transplanted from 1999 to 2012, 250 consecutive patients (pts) with myeloid malignancies (AML, MDS) aged ≥ 60 years (yrs). The 144 male and 106 female pts with a median age of 66 yrs (range 60-77) were transplanted for de novo AML (n=95), s/tAML (n=104) and MDS (n=51) with 89% unfavorable cytogenetics (CALGB). Since 2004 pts received a prospective fitness assessment (Deschler et al., Haematologica 2013). In 74% the donor was matched/mismatched unrelated and in 26% related. Only 16% were transplanted in CR1/2, 84 % with advanced or untreated disease. The conditioning regimen was the FBM protocol (fludarabine, carmustine, melphalan; Bertz et al., JCO 2003) in 98%, and 97% of the pts received PBSC. For GVHD prophylaxis in 91% a combination of cyclosporine plus alemtuzumab or ATG-F™ was used. At day +30, 94% of the pts had achieved CR by standard measures. With a median follow up of 57 months (3-157) 37% of the pts are alive; main causes of death were relapse (n=62), infection (n=35) and age-related diseases (n=13). The probability of OS/DFS was at 1yr 61%/49%, at 2 yrs 49%/41% and at 5 yrs 37%/34%, respectively. The probability for NRM at 1 yr is 24%. Nineteen known prognostic factors for outcome were evaluated: e.g. patient and donor age, graft size, days between diagnosis and alloHCT, CMV, early/advanced disease, cytogenetics, Sorror and Gratwohl score, donor type, HLA-identity. In the multivariate analysis a better OS (factors with p<0.1; table) was seen with a matched donor; a better DFS with a related donor, and high CD34+ graft content; in contrast, a mismatched donor is a risk factor for reduced DFS.TableMultivariate analysis of prognostic factors* for OS and DFSvariablevalueHazard Ratio95% CI lower limit95% CI upper limitP valueOverall survivalRemission at alloHCTadvanced1.370.862.160.1825HLA mismatchyes1.401.011.960.0463HCT-CI (Sorror)>= 21.311.011.960.1007Peripheral blood blastsyes1.210.841.760.3034Disease-free survivalRemission at alloHCTadvanced1.290.722.300.3946Donorrelated0.640.430.950.0258HLA mismatchyes1.440.992.090.0561CD34+ cells> median0.760.551.040.0867Bone marrow blasts> 5%1.210.781.880.3915*in univariate analysis p<0.157 (AIC criterion; Sauerbrei W, 1999 Applied Statistics,48:313-329.70.) In conclusion, this unique large cohort of older pts with AML/MDS with mainly advanced disease and unfavorable cytogenetics shows a high feasibility, safety and efficacy of alloHCT after the FBM protocol. AML/MDS pts in their 7th and 8th decade of life fit for transplant should be evaluated for alloHCT as very important long-term curative option. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.