Loss Of Major Molecular Response As a Trigger For Restarting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy In CP-CML Patients Who Have Stopped Imatinib After Durable Undetectable Minimal Residual Disease

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 381-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Aude Charbonnier ◽  
Pascale Cony-Makhoul ◽  
Philippe Agape ◽  
Franck E Nicolini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Purpose More than half of patients with chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CP-CML) in complete molecular response (CMR) experience molecular relapse after imatinib discontinuation. We investigated loss of major molecular response (MMR) as a criterion for resuming therapy. Patients and methods A multicenter observational study (A-STIM, According to STop IMatinib) evaluating MMR persistence was conducted in 80 CP-CML patients who had stopped imatinib after prolonged confirmed CMR (24 months or more). Patients with confirmed CMR with 1 or 2 occasional weak positive samples before study entry were also considered eligible. CMR was defined as undetectable BCR-ABL transcript with a sensitivity of at least 40000 amplified copies of the ABL control gene, in accordance with the level of sensitivity routinely applied within laboratories participating in the French GBMHM Network. Results Median time from imatinib initiation to discontinuation was 79 months (range 30-145), median duration of CMR before imatinib discontinuation was 41 months (24-96), and median follow-up after discontinuation was 31 months (8-92). Twenty-nine patients (36%) lost MMR after a median of 4 months off-therapy (2-17). Cumulative incidence of MMR loss was estimated as 35% (95% CI, 25%-46%) at 12 months and 36% (95% CI, 26%-47%) at 24 months whereas probability of losing CMR was estimated as 51% at 12 months (95% CI, 41%-63%) and 54% at 24 months (95% CI, 44%-66%). Fivety two percent of the patients met the criteria for cCMR but experienced occasional BCR-ABL positivity (unstable cCMR). Those patients were not at higher risk of losing MMR as compared to patients with stable cCMR. This observation may potentially increase by two-fold the number of patients eligible for TKI discontinuation. Fluctuation of BCR-ABLtranscript levels below the MMR threshold (≥ 2 consecutive positive values) were observed in 31% of patients after imatinib discontinuation. Using cell sorting in three fluctuating patients, we were able to confirm that BCR-ABL signal was mostly present in the CD15 positive fraction, demonstrating first that BCR-ABL residual signal was not related to long living lymphoid cells and second that residual CML cells retain a clonogenic potential. Treatment-free remission was estimated as 64% (95% CI, 54%-75%) at 12 and 24 months and 61% (95% CI, 51%-73%) at 36 months. Treatment was resumed in 31 patients after loss of MMR. Twenty-three patients regained CMR4.5 and 8 patients are in MMR under therapy after 2+ to 17+ months. Median to time to a second CMR was estimated as 7.3 months in retreated patients. Conclusion The probability of losing MMR after imatinib discontinuation was estimated as 36% in the long-term. Loss of MMR is a practical and safe criterion for restarting therapy in CML patients with prolonged CMR and could be used for future discontinuation studies. Disclosures: Rousselot: Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Cony-Makhoul:BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Nicolini:BMS, Teva, Ariad, Pfizer, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfeizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Guerci-Bresler:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Turhan:BMS: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Guilhot:BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Mahon:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Brisol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Nilotinib Results in Improved Rates of Molecular Response in Turkish Newly Diagnosed CML-CP Patients: A 24-Month Update

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5532-5532
Author(s):  
Guray Saydam ◽  
Ibrahim Celalettin Haznedaroglu ◽  
Leylagul Kaynar ◽  
Akif S. Yavuz ◽  
Ridvan Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Introduction Nilotinib, a more potent and selective BCR-ABL-1 inhibitor than imatinib, is approved by the FDA and EMA 1) for the treatment of chronic and accelerated phase Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib and 2) for the treatment of newly-diagnosed Ph+ CML patients in the chronic phase (CML-CP). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nilotinib in a Turkish population of newly-diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP patients. Methods The study was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase II clinical trial. All patients were to be treated with nilotinib (AMN107, Tasigna®) 300 mg BID for 24 months. Results As of April 30, 2014, of the 96 patients out of a total 112 enrolled that had 24 month follow-up, 77 completed active treatment period. General characteristics of the patients at baseline are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics (96 patients) Data are expressed as median (minimum-maximum) or number (%), where appropriate. Molecular response by 24 months is presented in Table 2. Table 2 Table 2. Molecular response Data are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%), where appropriate. MMR (Major molecular rate): BCR-ABL/control gene ratio of ≤%0.1 measured by RQ-PCR as % * The number of patients who were still on treatment at 3rd month. Cumulative MMR rates at various time points are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Cumulative major molecular response rates at various time points Figure 1. Cumulative major molecular response rates at various time points A total of 486 adverse events (AEs) occurred; 93 AE led to discontinuation of the drug temporarily or permanently. Out of 96 patients 39 patients have temporally or permanently discontinued treatment. Permanent discontinuation rate due to adverse event was 9.6% (9 patients) which was the most common reason among all patients (19.8% - 19 patients) who permanently discontinued during 24 months. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequent (10.4%) AE, followed by hyperbilirubinemia (8.3%) and increased lipase level (7.3%) 19.8% of the patients entered in the trial had history of cardiovascular disease prior to trial entry and during the study cardiovascular events have been reported at 20.8% of patients. Despite published peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) reports related to nilotinib usage, there were no PAOD events reported at our cohort. Conclusions At 24 months, in Turkish patients with newly diagnosed CML, the cumulative MMR rate was 80.2%. Month 3 MMR rate was 86.5% and median time to MMR was 260.0±157.5 days. Out of 12 patients whose bcr-abl levels were above 10% at 3rd month, only 5 of them could reach to MMR by 24 months. Only one progression occurred, during the first year of therapy. These results suggest that high efficacy was achieved with nilotinib, an approved first-line therapy for newly diagnosed chronic phase of CML (CP-CML). The results of the present study revealed that efficacy and safety of nilotinib in Turkish cohort are similar to those reported in ENESTnd. This study contribute to well established nilotinib profile for chronic phase CML patients which is a licensed alternative for the treatment of newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP in Turkey. Disclosures Saydam: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yavuz:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ali:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Guvenc:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonmez:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Akkaynak:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Employment. Dag:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Turkey: Employment.

scholarly journals A Retrospective Analysis about Frequency of Monitoring in Italian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients after Discontinuation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4153-4153
Author(s):  
Matteo Emidio Dragani ◽  
Giovanna Rege Cambrin ◽  
Paola Berchialla ◽  
Irene Dogliotti ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Molecular Monitoring ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Tki Discontinuation

Background: Successful tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) discontinuation has been obtained in some patients (pts) with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). Careful molecular monitoring after discontinuation is the key to guarantee the safety, in terms of prompt resumption of therapy according to retreatment threshold criteria. It was observed that the majority of relapses usually occur during the first 6 months after TKI discontinuation [Saussele S, Lancet Oncol 2018; Etienne G, JCO 2017], accounting for the monthly quantitative PCR (qPCR) that all prospective protocols included in the trial design at least during the first half-year. Two studies [Kong HJ, Cancer 2017; Shanmuganathan N, Blood 2019] investigated if performing molecular analysis with a different and less "cautious" timeframe yields comparable efficacy with logistical issues reduction. Here we retrospectively evaluated how molecular monitoring has been conducted in Italy on a cohort of patients not included in any prospective trial with follow-up visits. Methods: The outcome of Italian patients with CP-CML who discontinued TKIs per clinical practice has recently been reported [Fava C, Haematologica 2019]. For the purpose of the present study, all the 32 participating centers were required to provide dates and molecular results available for each enrolled patient in the first 24 months after TKI stop. Descriptive analysis was carried out. The average time to the loss of major molecular response (MMR), the frequency of the visits (monitoring) and the occurrence of loss of MMR within the first 6 months, between 6-12 months, and 13-24 months were computed. When appropriate non-parametric tests were used to test for differences. Results: 227 chronic phase CML pts were included in this sub-analysis. Median age at TKI discontinuation was 58.73 years and median follow up since TFR was 2.03 years. In this timeframe every patient had a mean of 7.95 appointments for molecular evaluation. Overall, 1804 analysis were performed, of which 18.2% happened in the first three months and 38.2% in the first six months. During the first three months of TKI discontinuation, 40 pts (17.6%) didn't have any molecular assessment; 78 pts (34.4%) had only 1 qPCR performed, 77 pts (33.9%) 2 qPCR, 31 pts (13.7%) 3 qPCR and 1 pt (0.4%) 4 qPCR. For the first six months after TKI stop, 7 pts (3.1%) didn't undergo any BCR-ABL1 evaluation; 37 pts (16.3%) had only 1 analysis, 60 pts (26.4%) 2 analysis, 37 pts (16.3%) 3 analysis, 28 pts (12.3%) were evaluated 4 times, 40 pts (17.6%) 5 times, 17 pts (7.5%) 6 times and only 1 pt (0.4%) 7 times. The majority of visits fell between the 3rd and the 7th month after TKI interruption (Figure 1) with 84 pts (52.2%) being evaluated at month 3, 96 pts (59.6%) at month 4, 80 pts (49.7%) at month 5, 89 pts (55.3%) at month 6, 101 pts (62.7%) at month 7. In the first six months the visits occurred with a mean interval of 1.44 months; between months 7-12 molecular evaluations were performed every 1.94 months; during the second year of discontinuation (months 13-24) every 2.89 months (p<0.001). Seventy-one pts lost major molecular response (MMR) in a mean time of 5.56 months. As expected, 55 pts (77.5%) lost MMR during the first six months whereas 16 pts (22.6%) relapsed later on: 3 pts (4.2) relapsed during the first month, 7 pts (9.9%) after two months, 13 pts (18.3%) after three, 19 pts (26.8%) after four, 8 pts (11.3%) after five months and 5 pts (7%) at six months. Only 6 patients lost MMR after 12 months of follow-up in TFR. All patients regained at least MMR after TKI resumption, and no progression occurred. Finally, we evaluated the number of patients who would experience a delay in the diagnosis of MMR loss if a three-months monitoring schedule was adopted. In the first 6 months, 15 pts (27.3%) would have a one month delay, 22 (40%) a 2 months delay; 18 pts (32.7%) would have a right timing. Very few patients would experience a delay in the following months (Figure 2). Discussion: The safety of TFR relies consistently on the management of patients off-therapy especially during the first 6 months, when molecular relapses more often occur. Our retrospective analysis showed that a less intense frequency of monitoring did not affect the success of TFR nor put pts at risk of progression. However, these data confirm that the first 6 months off-treatment require a more stringent follow-up for early detection of MMR loss. Disclosures Rosti: BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Castagnetti:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squiib: Consultancy, Honoraria. Capodanno:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Ferrero:Novartis: Honoraria. Crugnola:Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Elena:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Breccia:Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Iurlo:Novartis: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Incyte: Other: Speaker Honoraria. Bocchia:BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Lunghi:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cedrone:BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Sgherza:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Santoro:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Giai:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Caocci:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Levato:Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Saglio:Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy. Fava:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria.

Response and Outcomes to Nilotinib at 24 Months in Imatinib-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and Accelerated Phase (CML-AP) with and without BCR-ABL Mutations.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1130-1130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerald P. Radich ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Enrico Gottardi ◽  
Simona Soverini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Abstract 1130 Poster Board I-152 Background Nilotinib is a selective and potent BCR-ABL inhibitor, with in vitro activity against most BCR-ABL mutants (excluding T315I) indicated for the treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) CML in CPor AP resistant or -intolerant to prior therapy, including imatinib. In a previous analysis of nilotinib in patients with BCR-ABL mutations, mutations occurring at three specific amino acid residues (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V) were shown to be associated with less favorable response to nilotinib. The current analysis is based on mature data with a minimum follow-up of 24-months for all patients. Outcomes of patients at 24 months were analyzed by mutation type. Methods Imatinib-resistant CML-CP (n = 200) and CML-AP (n = 93) patients were subdivided into the following mutational subsets: no mutation, sensitive mutations (including mutations with unknown in vitro IC50). or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations at baseline. Patients with mutations of unknown in vitro sensitivity were classified as sensitive in this analysis based on a previous finding that patients with these mutations responded similarly to nilotinib as patients with sensitive mutation. Patients with baseline T315I mutations were excluded from this analysis. Patient groups were analyzed for kinetics and durability of cytogenetic and molecular response to nilotinib, as well as event-free survival (EFS), defined as loss of hematologic or cytogenetic response, progression to AP/BC, discontinuation due to disease progression, or death, and overall survival (OS). Results In CML-CP and -AP patients with no mutation, sensitive mutations, or E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations, hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular responses are provided in the Table. Overall, patients with no mutations responded similarly to patients with sensitive mutations, whereas patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had less favorable responses. This correlation was observed in both CML-CP and CML-AP patients, respectively. Median time to CCyR was 3.3 months (range, 1.0–26.7) for CML-CP patients with no mutations, and 5.6 months (range, 0.9–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. At 24 months, CCyR was maintained in 74% of CML-CP patients with no mutation and in 84% of patients with sensitive mutations. One patient with CML-CP and an E255K mutation achieved CCyR at 25 months and maintained until last assessment at 30 months. Median time to MMR was similar at 5.6 months (range, 0.9–25.8) for CML-CP patients with no mutations and 5.6 months (range, 2.7–22.1) for patients with sensitive mutations. No patient with a less sensitive mutation achieved MMR. Median EFS and 24-month estimated OS rate are provided in the Table. Conclusions Imatinib-resistant CML-CP and CML-AP patients treated with nilotinib therapy with BCR-ABL mutations (excluding E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V) achieved rapid and durable cytogenetic responses, and estimated EFS and OS at 24 months similar to that of patients with no mutations, respectively. Patients with E255K/V, Y253H, or F359C/V mutations had lower and less-durable responses and shorter EFS than patients with sensitive mutations. Alternative therapies may be considered for patients with these uncommon mutations (E255K/V, Y253H, and F359C/V). Disclosures Radich: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding. Branford:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shou:Novartis: Employment. Haque:Novartis: Employment. Woodman:Novartis: Employment. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Maintaining Imatinib ≥600 Mg Daily in the First 12 Months of Chronic Phase CML Treatment Is Associated with Superior Event-Free Survival at 5 Years.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1125-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P Osborn ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
Deborah L White ◽  
John F Seymour ◽  
Ruth Columbus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Event Rates

Abstract Abstract 1125 Poster Board I-147 The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group conducted a trial (TIDEL I) in 103 patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML, using imatinib 600 mg/day with dose escalation to 800 mg/day for suboptimal response. This was defined as failure to achieve (1) complete haematological response (CHR) at 3 months, (2) major cytogenetic response (MCR) at 6 months, (3) complete cytogenetic response (CCR) or molecular equivalent at 9 months, or (4) less than 0.01% (IS) BCR-ABL by RQ-PCR at 12 months. Here we report the outcomes with all surviving patients having been treated for at least 60 months. We aimed to determine whether the patient outcome at 60 months was predicted by the molecular response within the first 18 months of imatinib therapy. The outcomes for patients maintaining a dose of imatinib of ≥600 mg/day in the first 12 months was compared to those who were on a reduced dose for at least part of this time. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as death from any cause, accelerated phase/blast crisis (AP/BC), and loss of CHR, MCR or CCR. The 103 patients included 66 males and 37 females with a median (±SD) age of 49 (±14) years. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-2 at enrolment. The 5-year EFS was 71%, transformation (AP/BC) free survival (TFS) was 95%, and overall survival was 87%. Of the 14 patients who died, 3 died in blast crisis, 2 from transplant-related complications, 8 from CML-unrelated causes, and the cause of death of 1 patient was unavailable. The annual rates of progression to AP/BC over 5 years were 3%, 1%, 0%, 1%, and 0%, while annual event rates were 13%, 8%, 8%, 1%, and 4%. CCR was achieved by 89% of patients by 60 months, while 72% achieved a major molecular response (MMR) by this time. In the first 12 months of treatment, 55% of patients maintained an imatinib dose of ≥600 mg/day (mean ±SD dose = 604 ±10 mg/day), while 45% were on <600 mg/day for at least part of this time (mean ±SD dose = 511 ±100 mg/day). EFS at 60 months was significantly higher in patients taking ≥600 mg/day compared with those who had been dose-reduced to <600 mg/day (89% vs 56%, P<0.001). Annual event rates for the ≥600 mg/day group were 6%, 2%, 2%, 0%, and 2%, while annual event rates for those on <600 mg/day were 14%, 16%, 16%, 8%, and 4%. By 60 months, 96% of patients who had been on ≥600 mg/day within the first 12 months had achieved CCR, while only 80% of those who had been on <600 mg/day had achieved this milestone (P<0.001). Log rank analysis of the achievement of MMR was also significant (P=0.03). Overall survival and TFS after 12 months were both similar between the dosing groups. There was no difference between the dosing groups' median age (50 vs 48 years, P=0.36) or Sokal score (1.04 vs 0.94, P=0.33) that may otherwise account for these results. The outcome was also determined for all patients dependent on the BCR-ABL levels at various assessment timepoints. Patients with a BCR-ABL level of <10% (IS) at 6 months (n=92) had an EFS of 78% at 60 months, while all of those with a level >10% (IS) (n=8) had an event (P<0.001). Patients with a level of ≤1% (IS) at 12 months (equivalent to CCR) (n=81) had an EFS of 75% compared with 25% (n=13) for those with levels >1% (IS) (P<0.001). At 18 months, a level ≤0.1% (IS) (n=58) conferred an EFS of 88%, while those who had failed to attain this depth of response (n=30) had an EFS of 60%. There was a significant difference in EFS between those who had achieved an MMR at 18 months and those who had achieved a CCR, but no MMR (88% vs 67%, P=0.03). In conclusion, our data suggest that patients maintaining a dose of ≥600mg in the first 12 months of imatinib therapy are more likely to achieve CCR and MMR, and superior EFS compared to those with a lower dose. This study also confirms that achieving an MMR by 18 months is associated with improved EFS. This emphasises the value of achieving a molecular response early in the treatment course, as well as adding weight to the evidence supporting the role of molecular monitoring in CML. Disclosures Branford: Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding. White:Novartis and Britol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Seymour:Bayer Schering: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel grants; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel Grants. Catalano:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel grants. Mills:Celgene Pty Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Outcome of Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) with Relapse After Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Therapy

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1518-1518
Author(s):  
Hun Ju Lee ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cns Relapse ◽  
Complete Hematologic Response

Abstract Abstract 1518 Background: Treatment with TKIs has greatly improved the outcome of patients with Ph+ ALL. However, many patients treated with TKI-based therapy eventually have a relapse. The response to salvage therapy and long-term outcomes of these patients are unknown. Aims: Describe the outcomes of patients with Ph+ ALL with resistance to or relapse after frontline TKI-based chemotherapy. Methods: We analyzed the outcome of patients who were treated in clinical trials at our institution between February 2001 and July 2008 with TKI-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL who had refractory or relapsed disease. Results: One hundred thirteen patients were treated with frontline hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone (HCVAD) plus imatinib (HCVAD+I; n=54) or HCVAD plus dasatinib (HCVAD+D; n=59). Of these, 35 (31%) experienced primary resistance (n=1) or relapse (n=34). The median age was 51 years [range (r): 20–85]; 12 patients (34%) were older than 60 years. Median follow-up was 21.1 mo (r: 4.2–56.7). Median white blood cell and platelet counts at diagnosis were 14.4 × 109/L (r: 1.2–292.9) and 48 × 109/L (r: 4–425), respectively. White blood cell count was >30 × 109/L in 13 patients (37%). Median peripheral and bone marrow blast percentages were 53% (r: 0–97%) and 80% (r: 1–98%), respectively. Twenty-two patients (63%) had received HCVAD+I and 13 (37%) HCVAD+D. Twenty-three patients (66%) had experienced first complete remission (CR1) with 1 cycle of induction. Median CR1 duration was 12 mo (r: 1.9–42). Four patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in CR1. ABL kinase domain mutations were investigated in 28 patients (80%) at relapse; 16 (57%) had mutations, including 5 (14%) with T315I (all had received HCVAD+D). Upon relapse, 31 patients received first salvage therapy (S1), 24 with chemotherapy [HCVAD+D, n=8; HCVAD+I, n=3; HCVAD+nilotinib (N), n=1; HCVAD+asparaginase (Asp), n=1; methotrexate, vincristine, Asp, and dexamethasone (MOAD), n=2; others, n=9]; 6 with a TKI only (I, n=2; D, n=1; N, n=1; others, n=2); and 1 with ASCT. Three patients were unfit for treatment. Median cycles of S1 were 2 (r: 1–8). Thirteen patients (42%) had second complete remission (CR2) (HCVAD+D, n=6; HCVAD+I, n=2; HCVAD+N, n=1; HCVAD+Asp, n=1; others, n=3). Median time to CR2 was 1.5 mo (r: 0.7–8.8). Five patients underwent ASCT in CR2. Median CR2 duration was 7.3 mo (r: 1.4–36.2). Complete cytogenetic response was seen in 11 patients (35%); major molecular response (BCR-ABL/ABL ratio <0.05%) in 9 (29%); and complete molecular response in 7 (22%); and complete hematologic response in 15 (48%). Times to complete cytogenetic response and complete molecular response were 1.3 mo (r: 0.7–10.6) and 3 mo (r: 1.5–8.7), respectively. Seven patients had second relapse. Fifteen patients (7 relapse, 8 refractory) received second salvage therapy (S2) with systemic chemotherapy (MOAD, n=2; phase I/single-agent TKI, n=8; others, n=5); 1 patient had solitary central nervous system (CNS) relapse treated with intrathecal cytarabine and methotrexate. CR3 was obtained in 1 patient, the patient with sole CNS relapse. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after S1 were 6.5 mo (r: 0.5–45) and 7.3 mo (r: 1.4–36.2), respectively. At last follow-up, 2 patients (6%) were alive and 33 had died, 11 (33%) of infectious complications, 5 (15%) of organ failure, 3 (9%) of bleeding complications, 2 (6%) of graft-versus-host disease complications, 2 (6%) of CNS relapse, and 10 (30%) of other or unknown causes. Median OS after S2 was 2.1 mo (r: 1.4–2.6). In univariate analysis, age >60 years was associated with worse OS after S1 [4.2 vs. 12.7 mo; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8 to 6.7 vs. 7.5 to 17.9 (P=0.006)]. Complete hematologic response was associated with improved OS after S1 [15.4 vs. 4.3 mo; 95% CI 9.1 to 21.8 vs. 2.5 to 6.0 (P<0.001)]. Major molecular response was associated with improved OS after S1 [18.1 vs. 5.7 mo; 95% CI 9.3 to 26.8 vs. 3.6 to 7.8 (P=0.003)]. Choice of prior TKI (HCVAD+I vs. HCVAD+D) did not significantly influence CR and OS after relapse. Conclusion: Patients with refractory or relapsed Ph+ ALL after TKI-based therapy have poor outcome, particularly those who are older or have persistent BCR/ABL transcripts. New agents are needed to improve the outcome in this population. Disclosures: Kantarjian: BMS: Research Funding. Ravandi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Cortes:Chemgenex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Switching to Nilotinib Is Associated with Continued Deeper Molecular Responses in CML-CP Patients with Minimal Residual Disease After ≥ 2 Years On Imatinib: Enestcmr 2-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 694-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Jeffrey H. Lipton ◽  
Nelson Spector ◽  
Brian Leber ◽  
Ricardo Pasquini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 694 Background: Superior rates of deeper molecular responses were achieved with nilotinib vs imatinib in patients newly diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials—newly diagnosed patients (ENESTnd) trial. In addition, the 12-month (mo) analysis of the ENEST—complete molecular response (ENESTcmr) study demonstrated that switching to nilotinib after a minimum of 2 years on imatinib led to increased rates of major molecular response (MMR) and deeper molecular responses vs remaining on imatinib. Results from ENESTcmr are presented here with minimum 24 mo of patient follow-up. Methods: Patients with Ph+ CML-CP who had achieved complete cytogenetic responses but still had persistent BCR-ABL positivity by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) after ≥ 2 years on imatinib were eligible. Patients (n = 207) were randomized to switch to nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID; n = 104) or to continue on the same dose of imatinib (400 or 600 mg once daily [QD]; n = 103). Rates of MMR, MR4 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.01% according to the International Scale [IS], corresponding to a 4-log reduction), MR4.5 (BCR-ABL ≤ 0.0032%IS, corresponding to 4.5-log reduction), and undetectable BCR-ABL via RQ-PCR with ≥ 4.5-log sensitivity were measured. Results: Among all randomized patients (intent-to-treat population), significantly more patients treated with nilotinib continued to achieve undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo (32.7% on nilotinib vs 16.5% on imatinib; P =.005; Table).The difference between the arms in achievement of this endpoint increased between 1 and 2 years (from 12.4% to 16.2%). The median time to MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL was also significantly faster on nilotinib than on imatinib (P = .005 and .003, respectively). Cumulative rates of MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL continued to be higher with nilotinib in patients without those responses at baseline, and the difference between arms appeared to increase over time. The safety profiles for nilotinib and imatinib were consistent with prior studies. By 24 mo, no patients in either arm progressed to accelerated phase/blast crisis. No patients on nilotinib died since the 12-mo analysis; 1 patient on imatinib died from metastatic prostate cancer in follow-up after discontinuation from the study. Conclusions: Switching to nilotinib led to significantly faster, deeper molecular responses in patients with minimal residual disease on long-term imatinib therapy. Since the 12-mo analysis, rates of deep molecular response (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) have remained significantly higher in patients who did not have the response at baseline and were switched to nilotinib (vs those remaining on imatinib). In fact, the difference in favor of nilotinib increased between 1 and 2 years. These results suggest that switching to the more potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib is beneficial in patients with minimal residual disease after long-term imatinib therapy. Achievement of these deeper molecular responses (MR4.5 and undetectable BCR-ABL) after switching to nilotinib may enable a greater proportion of CML-CP patients to be eligible for future discontinuation studies. Cumulative rates of confirmed undetectable BCR-ABL by 24 mo will be presented as the confirmation assessments for several responders were not available at the time of this analysis. Disclosures: Hughes: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; CSL: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Spector:Novarits: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Leber:Novartis: Advisory Board Other, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Schwarer:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Etienne:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Purkayastha:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Collins:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Szczudlo:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp: Employment. Cervantes:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Pegylated Interferon-Alpha 2a in Combination with Nilotinib As First-Line Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (Nilopeg trial). Four-Year Follow-up Results

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1578-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
Gabriel Etienne ◽  
Viviane Dubruille ◽  
Lydia Roy ◽  
Françoise Huguet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Pegylated Interferon ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Log Reduction

Abstract Background & aims In the Nilopeg trial (EudraCT 2010-019786-28), we have previously demonstrated that the combination of nilotinib (Tasigna® Novartis), a second generation inihibitor (TKI2), combined to pegylated interferon-alpha 2a (Peg-IFN, Pegasys®, Roche) in de novo chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients is able to induce high rates of molecular responses with an acceptable additional toxicity (F. E. Nicolini et al. Lancet Haematology 2015) within 24 months of follow-up. We report here the ≥4-year follow-up of such patients for toxicity and efficacy. Methods In a phase 2 study, newly diagnosed CP-CML patients were assigned to a priming strategy by Peg-IFN (± HU) for a month at 90 mg/wk, prior to a combination of nilotinib 300 mg BID + Peg-IFN 45 micro.g/wk for ≥ 1 year, maximum 2 years. After 2 years nilotinib was continued alone. The primary endpoint was the rate of confirmed molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) by 1 year. Molecular assessments were centralised for all patients and expressed as BCR-ABLIS in % for 2 years and then performed in each center [all expressed in % on the international scale (IS)]. All data presented here are in intention-to-treat. Events were defined as death, progression to AP or BC, failure on nilotinib or nilotinib treatment discontinuation for any cause excluding treatment-free remission (TFR). Results Fourty-two patients were enrolled in this trial (one withdrawn its consent prior to treatment initiation), and the median follow-up is now 50.7 (47.8-52.8) months. Sokal and Euro scores were high for 12% and 2%, intermediate for 49% and 55% and low for 39% and 43% of the patients respectively. The median age at treatment initiation was 53 (23-85) years, 2 patients had a masked Philadelphia chromosome, 3 a variant form, and 1 additional chromosomal abnormalities, all patients had "major" BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The rates of Complete Cytogenetic Responses (CCyR) at "6", and "12" months of combination (i. e. at 5 and 11 months of TKI2) were 71%, and 100% respectively. Eighty seven percent of patients had a BCR-ABLIS ≤10% at M3 (i. e. after 2 months TKI). The rates of molecular responses respectively at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months were 76%, 78%, 83%, 73% for MMR, 51%, 58.5%, 66%, 58.5% for 4 log reduction (MR4), 17%, 34%, 34%, 44% for 4.5 log reduction (MR4.5), 12%, 32%, 29%, 41.5% for ≥5 log reduction (MR5), shown as cumulative incidence curves for MR4.5 in figure 1. The median doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients during the first year were 45 (0-45) micro.g/wk, and for nilotinib 600 (300-600) mg daily. Interestingly, logistic regression analysis adjusted on MR4.5 responses showed a significant relationship with the mean doses of Peg-IFN delivered to the patients at 12 months (p=0.003, OR = 1.09 [1.03-1.16]), 24 months (p=0.005, OR = 1.08 [1.02-1.14]) and 48 months (p=0.024, OR = 1.09 [1.01-1.17], but not with the mean doses of nilotinib [p=0.84, OR = 0.99 [0.99-1.01], p=0.087, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01], and p=0.88, OR = 1 [0.99-1.01] respectively. Eight patients (19.5%) were in TFR for a median of 6.8 (0.5-9.5) months after 2-year consecutive MR4.5, and none lost MMR yet at last follow-up. One patient died of progression (unmutated myeloid blast crisis at M6, who relapsed after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation). There was no additional grade 3-4 hematologic or biochemical toxicities occurring after 24 months. At last follow-up 10 patients switched for another TKI (2 for dasatinib, 5 for imatinib, and 3 for imatinib followed by dasatinib), for unsufficient cytogenetic or molecular response (2 patients) or for toxicity (7 patients). Overall, 4 patients presented some cardio-vascular events 3 coronary stenoses, one brain stroke). Conclusion Despite additional initial toxicities Peg-IFN priming strategy, followed by the combination of nilotinib and Peg-IFN during the first year induces very high rates of durable deep molecular responses (MR4 and MR4.5) at later time-points, offering TFR for number of patients. To date, no emerging severe adverse events occurred. However, to confirm these promising results, a randomised phase III study testing nilotinib versus nilotinib + Peg-IFN is absolutely warranted and in progress. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of MR4.5 Disclosures Nicolini: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Ariad Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Etienne:ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Congress Travel/Accomodations, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Roy:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Huguet:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Legros:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Giraudier:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Coiteux:BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Guerci-Bresler:ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Speakers Bureau. Rea:Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Amé:BMS: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Cony-Makhoul:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gardembas:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Hermet:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Rousselot:Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Mahon:ARIAD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

High Dose Imatinib Induction Therapy (800 mg/day, 6 Months) In Pre-Treated Chronic Phase CML Patients Improves Cytogenetic and Molecular Responses but Does Not Improve Overall and Progression Free Survival – Final Results of the CELSG Phase III CML11 “ISTAHIT” Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2271-2271
Author(s):  
Andreas L Petzer ◽  
Dominic Fong ◽  
Thomas Lion ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
Zvenyslava Masliak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2271 Introduction: Imatinib 400 mg/day represents the current standard treatment for de novo as well as pre-treated CML patients in chronic phase (CP). Recent randomized phase III trials revealed conflicting results concerning the potential higher efficacy of dose-increased imatinib in de novo treated CP-CML. Methods: We here present the final analyses including response data, OS, EFS and PFS of the multicenter, randomised, 2-arm phase III CELSG “ISTAHIT” trial evaluating imatinib high dose (HD) induction (800 mg/day, 6 months) followed by 400 mg/day as maintenance (experimental arm B) compared to continuous imatinib standard dose (400mg/day; arm A) in pre-treated CP CML patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0032726. Results: From a total of 243 patients screened for inclusion, 16 patients were not eligible (mainly due to non sufficient numbers of metaphases obtainable from the bone marrow before the start of the study). Of the remaining 227 patients, 113 patients were randomized into arm A and 114 patients into the experimental arm B. Subsequent data are presented as per protocol. No significant differences between treatment groups were observed regarding sex (55.5% female, 44.5% male), age (median: 46.3 years, range 18 –76), Sokal scores at diagnosis (30% low, 41% intermediate, 16% Sokal high risk, 13% unknown) and different pre-treatments, which included hydroxyurea (96%), interferon (72%), busulfan (17%) and “others” (26%; mainly Ara-C). The median observation time was 673 days. Cytogenetic responses were generally higher in the experimental arm B and revealed statistically significant differences in major cytogenetic responses (MCyR) at 3 and 6 months (month 3: 25.8% arm A, 48.3% arm B, p=0.002; month 6: 41.9% arm A, 58.8% arm B, p=0.029) as well as in complete cytogenetic responses (CCyR) not only during imatinib HD therapy (month 3: 7.5% arm A, 29.9% arm B, p<0.001; month 6: 20.4% arm A, 47.4% arm B, p<0.001) but also thereafter (month 12: 31.8% arm A, 52.9% arm B, p=0.006). The primary endpoint of the study, the achievement of an improved MCyR at 12 month was, however, not significantly different (56.8% arm A, 64.4% arm B). In line with improved cytogenetic responses, major molecular response (MMRIS) rates were also significantly better at 3, 6 and even at 24 months in the HD arm B (month 3: 3.7% arm A, 15.9% arm B, p=0.003; month 6: 9.4% arm A, 34.6% arm B, p<0.001; month 24: 26.5% arm A, 42.5% arm B, p=0.034). Surprisingly, however, this impressing improvement in cytogenetic and molecular remissions in patients achieving high dose imatinib as induction therapy did not translate into a better OS and PFS, both of which were comparable in the two treatment arms (OS: p=0.25; EFS: p=0.37). Moreover, the EFS was even significantly worsened in the experimental arm B (p=0.014). Grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities during the first 6 months of therapy were comparable, whereas grade 3/4 haematological toxicities were significantly more common in the imatinib HD arm B. Conclusions: Although high dose imatinib induction induces more rapid and higher cytogenetic and molecular remission rates in pre-treated CP CML patients, OS as well as PFS were not improved and EFS was even worsened in the high dose induction arm B. Therefore we conclude that imatinib 400mg/day remains the standard of care for pre-treated CP-CML patients. Disclosures: Petzer: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Imatinib 800mg is not licensed as the initial therapy of chronic phase CML. Lion: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bogdanovic: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Griskevicius: Novartis: Research Funding. Kwakkelstein: Celgene: Employment. Rancati: Novartis: Consultancy, Employment, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gastl: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wolf: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Superior CMR-Rates with Tolerability-Adapted Imatinib 800 Mg Vs. 400 Mg Vs. 400 Mg + IFN In CML: The Randomized German CML-Study IV

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 357-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüdiger Hehlmann ◽  
Susanne Jung-Munkwitz ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Martin C. Müller ◽  
Armin Leitner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
First Choice ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 357 Treatment of CML with imatinib of 400 mg can be unsatisfactory. Treatment optimization is warranted. The German CML-Study group has therefore conducted a randomized study comparing imatinib 800 mg vs 400 mg vs 400 mg + IFN. A significantly faster achievement of MMR at 12 months has been observed with imatinib 800 mg in a tolerability adapted manner and MMR by 12 months has been found to translate into better overall survival. Since stable CMR has been associated with durable off-treatment remissions we sought to analyse the impact of tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg on CMR and survival. Standardized determinations of molecular response and evaluation of its impact on outcome are goals of CML-Study IV. CMR4 is defined as a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of <0,01 on the International Scale. From July 2002 – April 30, 2009 1022 newly diagnosed patients with CML in chronic phase were randomized, 1012 were evaluable (338 with imatinib 800 mg, 324 with imatinib 400 mg, 350 with imatinib plus IFN). Median observation time was 40 months. The median average daily imatinib doses were 628 mg in the 800 mg arm and 400 mg in the 400 mg based arms. The actual median daily doses in the 800 mg arm per 3-months periods were: 555 mg, 737 mg, 613 mg, 600 mg, and 600 mg thereafter, reflecting the run–in period with imatinib 400 mg for 6 weeks in the first period and the adaptation to tolerability from the third 3-months period onwards. Median daily imatinib doses in the 400 mg arms were 400 mg throughout. Adaptation of imatinib dose in the 800 mg arm according to tolerability is reflected by similar higher-grade adverse events rates (WHO grades 3 and 4) with all treatments. Significantly higher remission rates were achieved with imatinib 800 mg by 12 months. The cumulative incidences of CCR by 12 months were 63% [95%CI:56.4-67.9] with imatinib 800 mg vs 50% [95%CI:43.0-54.5] with the two 400 mg arms. The cumulative incidences of MMR by 12 months were 54.8% [95%CI:48.7-59.7] with imatinib 800 mg vs 30.8% [95%CI:26.6-36.1] with imatinib 400 mg vs 34.7% [95%CI:29.0-39.2] with imatinib + IFN. The cumulative incidences of CMR4 compared with the MMR incidences over the first 36 months are shown in Table 1. Imatinib 800 mg shows superior CMR4 rates over the entire 36 months period, CMR4 is reached significantly faster with imatinib 800 mg as compared to the 400 mg arms. The CMR4 rates reach 56.8% by 36 months [95%CI:49.4-63.5] as compared to 45.5% with imatinib 400 mg [95%CI:38.7-51.0] and 40.5% with imatinib plus IFN [95%CI:34.6-46.3]. Most patients have stable CMR4 over the entire period. Time after start of treat-ment (months) Cumulative incidences MMR(%) CMR4 (%) IM400 n=306 D IM800 n=328 D IM400 +IFN n=336 IM400 n=306 D IM800 n=328 D IM400 +IFN n=336 6 8.6 9.5 18.1 9.7 8.4 3 0.7 3.7 1.3 2.4 12 30.8 24.0 54.8 20.1 34.7 7.5 12.3 19.8 7.4 12.4 18 50.3 18.1 68.4 14.3 54.1 21.2 12.2 33.4 9.8 23.6 24 63 13.0 76.0 13.2 62.8 30.7 12.3 43 13 30.0 36 79.3 2.3 81.6 10.9 70.7 45.5 11.3 56.8 16.3 40.5 In summary, superior CMR4 rates are achieved with high-dose imatinib adapted to good tolerability, and more patients in the tolerability-adapted 800 mg arm have stable CMR4 qualifying for treatment discontinuation as compared to the 400 mg based arms. With improved application imatinib remains first choice for early CML. Disclosures: Koschmieder: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. German CML-Study Group:Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

Effect of Time to Dasatinib Initiation On Outcome of Imatinib-Intolerant Patients with Chronic-Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CP-CML): Results From a European Observational Study (FORTE; CA180–211)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1689-1689
Author(s):  
David Marin ◽  
Enrica Morra ◽  
Mauricette Michallet ◽  
Andrzej Hellmann ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Abstract 1689 Background: Approximately half of patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CP-CML) fail imatinib treatment, both in interventional (Deininger et al., Blood 2009 114: abstract 1126) and observational trials (Michallet et al., Curr Med Res Opin 2010;26(2): 307–17), primarily due to the development of resistance and/or toxicity (Kantarjian and Cortes. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(12): 1512–16). Clinical evidence suggests that optimal outcomes are achieved when dasatinib is administered early after imatinib failure (Quintas-Cardama et al., Cancer 2009;115(13): 2912–21); however, limited data are available regarding outcome of patients intolerant to imatinib in the real-life setting. Aims: FORTE (Factors impacting On Response To dasatinib in Europe) is a European observational study that aims to estimate the relationship between time elapsed from first detection of imatinib resistance/intolerance until initiation of dasatinib and best response to dasatinib, adjusted for other potentially explanatory factors. Methods: Data were collected retrospectively and prospectively from medical records. Best response to dasatinib, as recorded in patient's charts, was reported by an ordered categorical variable, combining all types of response achieved by a patient and selecting the “highest” level. A predefined list of covariates (sex; age at dasatinib initiation; time from diagnosis to dasatinib initiation; best response to prior imatinib and last imatinib dose) were entered/removed in a Proportional Odds model to identify factors potentially influencing dasatinib best response over a 12-month observation period. Results presented here focus on the imatinib-intolerant subpopulation. Results: FORTE enrolled 549 adult patients with imatinib-resistant/intolerant CP-CML at 124 sites across 12 European countries. Of 457 eligible patients, 176 (39%) were imatinib intolerant, including 71 (16%) who were both resistant and intolerant to imatinib. Approximately half (47%) of intolerant patients were male. Median age at dasatinib initiation was 59 years and median times from CML diagnosis to imatinib and dasatinib initiation were 1.5 and 39.8 months, respectively. Sokal and Hasford scores were intermediate/high in 74% and 72% of assessed patients, respectively. Overall, 54% of 171 imatinib-intolerant patients had achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) or major molecular response (MMR) on imatinib. During the 12 month observation period, 72% of imatinib-intolerant patients achieved a CCyR or MMR with dasatinib. Adjusting for the effect of best imatinib response, an analysis of 161 evaluable patients showed strong statistical evidence (p<0.0001) that shortening the time elapsed between imatinib intolerance and dasatinib initiation was more likely to result in a better response to dasatinib (including CCyR/MMR), with an estimated odds ratio of 0.96 [95% CI: 0.943–0.977]. Conclusions: Results from the imatinib-intolerant population of the FORTE study suggest that an early switch to dasatinib provides a clinical advantage to CP-CML patients intolerant to imatinib. Findings from this real-life observation are consistent with data from interventional trials. Disclosures: Marin: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Morra:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Speakers Bureau. Niederwieser:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Schloegl:AOP Orphan: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Ho:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ossenkoppele:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria. Guerra:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mori:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Pans:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. van Baardewijk:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Steegmann:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document