Validation of Digital-PCR Analysis through Programmed imatinib Interruption in Q-RT-PCR Negative Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4040-4040
Author(s):  
Silvia Mori ◽  
Elisabetta Vagge ◽  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
Bruno Martino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Diagnostic Method ◽  
Digital Pcr ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Molecular Remission

Abstract Introduction Imatinib induces complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in up to 80% of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) and major molecular response (MMR) in 33-60% of them. These patients enjoy life expectancy similar to general population. However even undetectable BCR-ABL may not equate to eradication of the disease because the sensitivity of the standard diagnostic method, the Q-RT-PCR, is limited. A new diagnostic method, the digital-PCR (dPCR), able to detect 1 BCR-ABL+ cell out of 107 cells, corresponding to a 100 times increased sensitivity as compared to conventional Q-RT-PCR, was developed (Goh HG et al., Leuk Lymphoma 52(5): 896-904. 2011). Therefore dPCR, assessing with more sensitivity the presence of minimal residual disease, could potentially identify pts in whom CML is eradicated. The Imatinib Suspension And Validation (ISAV) study is aimed at assessing the capability of dPCR to predict relapses after imatinib discontinuation in CML pts with negative Q-RT-PCR results. Methods This study involves 15 sites, 10 in Italy and 5 in each of the following countries: Germany, Spain, The Netherlands, Canada and Israel. In this study CML patients (Chronic Phase or Accelerated Phase) under imatinib therapy since more than 2 years and in complete molecular remission (CMR) were eligible. Patients had to be in CMR for at least 18 months, with a minimum of 3 Q-RT-PCR performed in their own centers. After signing the informed consent, pts were tested for dPCR and discontinued imatinib therapy. They are being monitored by standard Q-RT-PCR for 36 months to assess the maintenance of the molecular remission. At the end of this period, a peripheral blood sample for dPCR analysis will be obtained from those pts who will still have undetectable BCR-ABL transcripts by Q-RT-PCR, to verify CML eradication. The loss of molecular remission is defined as two consecutive positive Q-RT-PCR tests with at least one BCR-ABL/ABL value above 0.1%. Patients losing molecular remission resumed imatinib treatment at the same dosage used before interruption. Patients’ quality of life during imatinib discontinuation/resumption is being evaluated trough the EORTC – C30 Quality of Life questionnaire. Results The enrollment in the ISAV study began in November 2011 and ended in June 2013. The study enrolled 112 pts: Italy 69.6%, Berlin 21.4%, Montreal 5.3%, Zaragoza 2.6% and Tel Hashomer 0.9%. Sixty-one percent of the pts were male and 38% were aged 65 or older; median duration of imatinib treatment is 102 months with median duration of CMR of 32 months before imatinib discontinuation. To date, the median follow-up (FUP) time is 4.6 months [95% CI: 4.1-5.8] and 92 pts out of 112 (82%) had at least one Q-RT-PCR performed after imatinib discontinuation. The following analysis is restricted to 48 pts with a minimum of 6 months of FUP. Of these 48 pts, 20 remained Q-RT-PCR negative (42%, 95% CI:29-56%, median duration of negativity after imatinib discontinuation: 10.3 months). Nineteen pts (40%, 95% CI:27-53%) relapsed and resumed imatinib. All relapses occurred in the first 10 months and all but 3 of them in the first 6 months. A loss of CCyR happened in 5 pts out of 19 (26%): 1 pt regained CCyR after 3 months of re-treatment and is now in CMR, 1 pt died shortly after the diagnosis of relapse because of lung adenocarcinoma and 3 pts are now being monitored after imatinib resumption. No case of progression of CML was observed. After the resumption of imatinib the median time to either MMR or CMR, whichever came first, was 2.1 [95% CI: 0.9-5.8] months. Finally, nine pts (18%, 95% CI:10-31%) regained Q-RT-PCR positivity but never lost MMR. The median time to Q-RT-PCR positivity in this group of pts was 2.92 months (range 1-5 months), and the range of duration of Q-RT-PCR positivity (below 0.1%) is between 2 and 14 months. No significant correlation between relapse and previous duration of imatinib treatment, time to CCyR or duration of CMR was present. Patients previously treated with interferon showed a trend toward lower risk of relapse which is not significant so far. Finally, 19% of pts complained of musculoskeletal/articular pain after imatinib discontinuation. Conclusions After 21 months from the beginning of the study with a median follow-up of 4.6 months, 40% of pts relapsed; the majority of relapses happened in the first 6 months after imatinib discontinuation. The correlation of dPCR results with clinical outcomes will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: le Coutre: Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Gozzini:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

scholarly journals The Risk of Relapse in CML Patients Who Discontinued imatinib Can Be Predicted Based on Patients Age and the Results of dPCR Analysis

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 813-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Mori ◽  
Elisabetta Vagge ◽  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
Bruno Martino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

Abstract Introduction. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (pts) treated with imatinib first line achieve complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in > 70% of cases and major molecular response (MMR) in 18-58%. These pts have a life expectancy similar to the general population. However even undetectable BCR-ABL may not equate to eradication of the disease because of the sensitivity of Q-RT-PCR. A new diagnostic method, the digital-PCR (dPCR), able to detect 1 BCR-ABL+ cell out of 107 cells, has been recently developed (Goh HG et al., 2011). dPCR corresponds to a 100 fold increase in sensitivity as compared to Q-RT-PCR. Therefore, dPCR by assessing the presence of minimal residual disease with higher sensitivity, could potentially identify pts in whom CML has been eradicated. Aims. The Imatinib Suspension And Validation (ISAV) study is aimed at validating the capability of dPCR to predict relapses after imatinib discontinuation in CML pts with negative Q-RT-PCR results. Methods. This study involves 15 sites, 10 in Italy and 1 in each of the following countries: Germany, Spain, The Netherlands, Canada and Israel. CML pts (Chronic or Accelerated Phase) under imatinib therapy since more than 2 years and in complete molecular remission (CMR) were eligible for this study. Patients had to be in CMR for at least 18 months (mts), with a minimum of 3 Q-RT-PCR performed at their own sites. After signing the informed consent, blood samples are obtained for dPCR and the pts discontinue imatinib therapy. Standard Q-RT-PCR is performed monthly (mts 1-6) and then bimonthly for 36 mts to assess the maintenance of the molecular remission. The loss of molecular remission is defined as two consecutive positive Q-RT-PCR tests with at least one BCR-ABL/ABL value above 0.1%. Patients losing molecular remission resume imatinib treatment at the same dosage used before interruption. Patients’ quality of life during imatinib discontinuation/resumption is evaluated through the EORTC – C30 Quality of Life questionnaire. Results. The enrolment in ISAV began in November 2011 and ended in July 2013. The study enrolled 112 pts: Italy 69.6%, Germany 21.4%, Canada 5.3%, Spain 2.6% and Israel 0.9%. Among the 112 pts, 59.3% were male and 37.0% were aged 65 or older; median duration of imatinib treatment was 103.1 mts with median duration of CMR of 25.8 mts before imatinib discontinuation. To date, the median follow-up (FUP) time is 16.6 mts [95% CI: 14.9-18.2]. Forty-seven pts (43.5%, 95% CI: 34.0-53.4) of the 108 eligible pts relapsed and resumed imatinib; 38/47 (80.9%) of them relapsed in the first 9 mts and the last relapse occurred 19.6 mts after imatinib discontinuation. A loss of CCyR occurred in 11 pts (23.4%): 10/11 CCyR losses were recovered; 1 patient withdrew the consent shortly after obtaining a partial cytogenetic response. No case of CML progression was observed. After the resumption of imatinib the median time to either MMR or CMR was 1.9 [95% CI: 1.2-2.4] mts. Of the 61 not-relapsed pts, 43 (39.8% of the total) regained Q-RT-PCR positivity but never lost MMR. The median time to Q-RT-PCR positivity was 3.6 mts [95% CI: 3.0-4.8] and the range of duration of Q-RT-PCR positivity (below 0.1%) was between 5.7 and 29.2 mts. No significant correlation between relapse and previous duration of imatinib treatment, use of interferon, time to CCyR or duration of CMR was identified. An inverse relationship between pts age and risk of relapse is evident: 90% of pts < 45 years relapsed vs 37.5% in the class ≥ 45 - < 65 years and 27.5% of pts ≥ 65 years, p(χ2)<0.0001. dPCR results showed that 23.4% of pts were positive and 76.6% negative, with a dPCR Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 63.4% (Tab.1) and a significant NPV ratio (dPCR/Q-RT-PCR) of 1.131 [95% CI: 1.032-1.239]. Age and dPCR results predicted the risk of relapse: pts with less than 45 years and with a positive dPCR had the highest risk of relapse (100%) as opposed to pts ≥ 45 years and with negative dPCR (30.6%; Fig.1). Conclusions. After 32 mts from the beginning of the study, with a median FUP of 16.6 mts, 43.5% of pts relapsed; the majority of relapses developed in the first 9 months after imatinib discontinuation. Age < 45 years and dPCR positivity are significantly associated with relapses. Funded by Regione Lombardia. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Imatinib Suspension and Validation (ISAV) Study: Final Results at 79 Months

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 461-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Mori ◽  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
Bruno Martino ◽  
Ester Pungolino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

Abstract Introduction. It is known that imatinib can be safely discontinued in patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) with minimal residual disease. Here we report an update of the Imatinib Suspension And Validation (ISAV) study at 79 months (mts) from study initiation to provide long term follow up data. Aims. The ISAV study aims to validate the capability of digital PCR (dPCR) to predict relapses after imatinib discontinuation in CML pts with negative Q-RT-PCR and to evaluate relapse rate, time to recurrence, survival and the impact of imatinib treatment on Quality of Life (QoL). Methods. This study involves 15 sites, 10 in Italy and 1 in each of the following countries: Germany, Spain, The Netherlands, Canada and Israel. CML pts (chronic or accelerated phase) treated with imatinib for more than 2 years and in complete molecular remission (CMR) were eligible. Patients had to be in CMR for at least 18 mts, with a minimum of 3 Q-RT-PCR performed at their own sites. After discontinuation of imatinib therapy, Q-RT-PCR was performed monthly (mts 1-6), bimonthly for 36 mts and then every 6 mts for additional 2 years, to assess the maintenance of the molecular remission. The loss of molecular remission was defined as two consecutive positive Q-RT-PCR tests with at least one BCR-ABL/ABL value above 0.1%. Patients losing molecular remission resumed imatinib treatment at the same dosage used before interruption. dPCR was performed at screening and at 36 mts for those pts who were still in remission. Patients' QoL during imatinib discontinuation/resumption was evaluated through the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results. The ISAV study enrolled 112 pts with a median follow-up time of 60.0 mts [95% CI: 59.6-60.6] for pts who do not relapsed; 66.1% of them completed the study as per protocol. The 58.9% of pts were male and 37.4% were aged 65 or older; median duration of imatinib treatment was 103.2 mts with median duration of CMR of 25.6 mts before imatinib discontinuation. At 79 mts from imatinib discontinuation, 56 pts of the 107 eligible ones relapsed and resumed imatinib with a relapse rate of 52.3% [95%CI: 20.4-32.6]; 69.6% of them relapsed in the first 9 mts. Of the 52 not-relapsed pts, 40 (76.9%) regained Q-RT-PCR positivity without losing MMR. In this latter group 2 pts experienced late relapses, at 30.6 and 45.5 mts respectively. A loss of CCyR occurred in 13 pts (23.6%): 10/13 CCyR losses were recovered, the remaining 3 were not assessed for response. No case of CML progression or resistance to imatinib was observed. After the resumption of imatinib the median time to MMR/CMR was 1.8 [95% CI: 1.0-2.0] mts. No significant correlation between relapse and previous duration of imatinib treatment, use of interferon, time to CCyR, Sokal score or duration of CMR was identified, while an inverse relationship between pts age and risk of relapse was evident. dPCR results before imatinib discontinuation showed that 23.4% of pts were positive and 76.6% negative at the time of discontinuation, with a Negative Predictive Value ratio (dPCR/Q-RT-PCR) of 1.1 [95%CI: 0.99-1.22]. At 36 mts from imatinib discontinuation 80.4% [95%CI: 30.6-50.4] of the pts tested were positive in dPCR. Moreover, the results of dPCR performed at imatinib discontinuation and age together can predict the risk of relapse: pts with less than 45 years and with a positive dPCR had the highest risk of relapse (100%) as opposed to pts ≥45 years and with negative dPCR (36.1%). The analysis of QoL evidenced a statistically significant improvement in the general well-being and symptoms scales at 1 month after imatinib discontinuation, particularly with regard to nausea, diarrhea, fatigue and insomnia (p<0.05). An inverse and transient trend toward increased pain emerged at mts 1 and 3. Conclusions. At 79 mts from the beginning of the study, 52.3% of pts relapsed, with 24% loosing CCyR. The majority of relapses occurred in the first 9 mts after discontinuation however late relapses were also observed, up to the 4th year. Therefore, pts who discontinue imatinib should be monitored for a long period of time, especially if they show positive PCR values after discontinuation. All relapsed pts including those who lost CCyR regained their original response after restarting TKI. Age <45 years and dPCR positivity are significantly associated with relapses. QoL analysis showed a significant decrease in symptoms after imatinib discontinuation. Funded by Regione Lombardia. Disclosures le Coutre: Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Abruzzese:BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Assouline:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding. Kim:Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ilyang: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Gambacorti-Passerini:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.

Molecular Response of CML Patients to INFα Based Treatment or to STI Based Therapy.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4872-4872
Author(s):  
Debora Luzi ◽  
Rosanna Capozzi ◽  
Annamaria Rauco ◽  
Roberta Pace ◽  
Emilio Donti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
The Other ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
First Time

Abstract Introduction: Continous improving results have been obtained during last two decades in the control of Ph’positive chronic myeloid leukemia(CML). However the final goal of molecular remission remains difficult to obtain even in the STI age. Aims : Evaluation of the rate of molecular response to IFNα,IFNα based treatment,to STI or to STI-INFα combination was analized in 100 consecutive Ph+ CML patients observed in a single Institution over a period of 20 years. Patients, Methods and Results All patients were treated at the time of diagnosis (87) or late (13) during the course of their disease. Distribution according to treatment was: INFα,63pts (late or early:13,50);INFα-ARA-C combination,20pts;STI,14 pts;STI-INFα association, 3 pts. Two pts, both initially assigned to INFα-ARA-C combination, were crossed-over to STI, one because relapsing off-therapy after a long lasting continous (25 mths) molecular remission and the other in cytogenetic response because intolerant to the initial treatment. In addition, other 3 pts patients, with persistent complete cytogenetic, but not molecular remission to INFα or INFα-ARA-C combination were subsequentially trated with the STI-IFNα association. At present,99/100 pts are evaluable. The median times of follow-up for the entire group and form the different treatment subgroups are: late IFNα 154 months(42–263); early IFNα, 71 months(1–197); IFNα-ARA-C, 61 months(5–203); STI- IFNα,78 mths(11–47), STI,31 mths(3–41). A complete kariotypic remission(CKR) was observed in 15/63 IFNα treated pts, in 10/20 IFNα-ARA-C pts group, in 10/13 cases of STI group and in 3 /3 pts who received STI-IFNα. A molecular response(RT-nested PCR, JQ Guo, Leukemia: 2002,15,2447–53) was observed in 4/15,2/10,5/10 and in 2/3 CKR pts initially trated with the different modalities listed above. Response was confirmed from 2 to 7 consecutive or not consecutive times in the 2/4 cases responsive to INFα, in the 2 cases responsive to INFα-ARA-C combination,4/5cases responsive to STI and in 2/3 cases responsive to STI-IFNα association. The 2nd and the 3rd molecular remission to STI were obtained in the patient molecularly and cytogenetically relapsed off-therapy and, for the first time from the diagnosis, in the other patient in CKR to IFNα-ARA-C combination and crossed to STI treatment. Furthermore, all 3 cases, in CKR, but not molecular response to other treatments at the time of cross-over to STI-IFNα combination, achieved a persistent (in 2 to 3 tests over a period ranging from 6+ to 12+ mths) molecular remission. The first interval between the start of the treatment and the first molecular response varied from 12 to 52, from 3 to 22, from 11 to 24, from 5 to 11 mths in the groups initially treated with IFNα, IFNα-ARA-C, STI or STI-IFNα respectively. The 2 pts, crossed-over to STI alone, both, obtained a response after 29 mths of therapy. In addition in the 3 pts crossed-over to STI-IFNα therapy, the molecular response was obtained after 14,23 and 25 mths from the start of last treatment. Conclusion It is not possible to achieve any conclusion regarding the treatment effect on molecular response duration because of the different length of follow-up of various groups of patients. However in responsive patients to IFN alone or combined to ARA-C or STI, consecutive negative RT-PCR tests were observed more frequently than in patients receving STI alone.

Imatinib at Weekly Dosage May Induce and Maintain Haematologic and Molecular Remission in Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia Harbouring FIP1L1-PDGFRA Fusion Gene- An Extended Follow-up Study.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1755-1755
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Helbig ◽  
Malgorzata Calbecka ◽  
Justyna Gajkowska ◽  
Andrzej Moskwa ◽  
Alina Urbanowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia ◽  
Weekly Dosage

Abstract Background. A small proportion of patients with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) demonstrate the presence of an interstitial deletion in chromosome 4 leading to the creation of the imatinib-responsive fusion gene- FIP1L1-PDGFRA (F/P). Recently, we showed that a single weekly dose of imatinib is sufficient to induce and maintain remission of chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL) with detectable F/P transcript. Here, we present data from 12 patients CEL and HES, 11 of which were F/P positive, who achieved a rapid complete haematologic remission (CHR) with daily imatinib treatment and remission was then maintained with a weekly imatinib schedule. Design and methods. Twelve patients, 11 out of 12 with detectable F/P were treated with imatinib at the initial doses varies between 100–400mg. There were 10 male and 2 female with a median age of 57 years (19–80). Median time to start imatinib was 23 months (1–204 months). The imatinib dose was de-escalated while patients remained in haematologic remission. As a response maintenance, once weekly imatinib was established in all cases. Results. All studied patients achieved a complete haematologic remission (CHR) and 100% of cases with detectable F/P fusion gene before imatinib, demonstrated a molecular remission determined by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. The breakpoints occured within exon 12 of PDGFRA whereas breakpoints dispersed across the FIP1L1 locus occuring between exons 10 and 13. Median time to achieve CHR was 13 days (4–90), and median time to molecular remission was 9 months (4–24). As a remission maintenance, imatinib doses were set at 100mg weekly in 9 pts and 200mg weekly in 3. With a median follow-up of 21 months (8–49 months) all pts remain in CHR. The FIP1L1-PDGFRA is undetectable in 11 patients by RT-PCR. Conclusions. Imatinib at weekly dosage may induce and maintain remission in patient with CEL expressing F/P fusion gene. This strategy appears to be safe and cost savings.

scholarly journals A Double Priming Induction Regimen for Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Inferior PS Among Resource Limited Areas

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5173-5173
Author(s):  
Stephen Liang ◽  
Siliang Chen ◽  
Xiaoli Huang ◽  
Zheyuan Qin ◽  
Sanbin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Subcutaneous Injection ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The treatment options for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) under inferior performance status (i.e. senior patients, MDS transformed AML, and patients with proven invasive fungal disease) are limited. The conventional "3+7" (idarubicin plus cytarabine) induction for those patients can be either too toxic, which leads to higher mortality rate, or requires prolonged recovery time thus raise medical cost. And the delay of consolidation may compromise outcome thus cause early relapse in such patients. Giving the rationale from the designing art of CPX-351, the prolonged IV time requirement for cytarabine, as well as mini-transplantation for AML treatment, at least in part, reflects the philosophy of a longer exposure to the chemo agent can be a more effective treatment approach for leukemia. On the other hand, the D-CAG protocol, which indicated an encouraging result for elderly patients with AML, indicated effectiveness of the strategy with reduced intensity. However, the cyto-toxic effect of decitabine with standard dose (20mg/m2) could still lead to severe treatment adverse events (AEs) thus raise the need of optimization of D-CAG regimen for patients with inferior PS. When considering the low dose hypo-methylation agent (HMA) can trigger the innate immunity response, the unique effect of homoharringtonine, as well as the effectiveness of CAG, we designed this DHCAG protocol following the principle of "longer exposure, lower intensity preceded by priming" and observed an unexpected excellent outcome with high CR rate, low induction failure and treatment mortality, as well as a higher cost effective value for patients with AML, when compared to "3+7" protocol, whom under inferior PS. From March 2016 - January 2018, we initiated this pilot study and investigated the safety and efficiency of this DHCAG protocol in patients with AML under poor PS. We enrolled 25 patients and administer the regimen as followings: i) G-CSF: 5μg/kg used when WBC <20×10^9/L at day 0-14 subcutaneous injection; ii) Decitabine: 6mg/m2 at day 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 iv drip; iii) Aclarubicin: 6mg/m2 at day 1-8 iv drip; iv) Homoharringtonine: 1mg/m2 at day 9-14 iv drip ( at day 9, if WBC >1*10^9/L then increase the dosage of homoharringtonine to 2mg/m2); iv) Cytarabine:10mg/m2 q12h at day 1-14 subcutaneous injection (if WBC >20*10^9/L then increase to 100mg/m2 by 24h CIV, or 50mg/m2 q12h by subcutaneous injection). The primary end point was complete hematologic remission, defined as a bone marrow blast cells ≤5%, Neutrophils in peripheral blood ≥1.0X109 /L, hemoglobin≥90g/L, and platelets ≥100X109/L and no any evidence of extramedullary leukemic infiltration; Secondary end points included numbers of adverse events, length of hospital stay, medical costs, and quality of life as measured with the use of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) questionnaire. Among the 25 patients in the study, 23 completed the induction therapy. And 21/25 patients had a hematologic complete remission after a median time of 19 days. Once complete remission had occurred, all 21 patients received post-remission treatment for another 5 cycles of DHCAG. Median follow-up was 14 months (range, 8 to 19) by June 2018. Interestingly, regardless of grade 3-4 myelo-suppression occurred all of our patients during induction, eight patients did not experienced grade 3-4 myelo-suppression during the following cycles. The median hospital stay is 22 days. The median of total medical costs for induction was $9,815 (range, $5,053 to $16,336) vs $14,705 for "3+7" induction protocol (history control. Data unpublished). Patients resumed their usual lifestyle during post-remission therapy, and their quality of life was rated as nearly normal on the FACT-G questionnaire. At the time of the last follow-up, seven patients had had a hematologic relapse. The results of our pilot study, in which we tested a priming based, low dose and longer exposure in 25 patients with AML under poor PS, showed that the treatment was safe, effective, and economical. A prospective multicenter, randomized trial comparing DHCAG with IA is now under way in China. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Observacional Study for Evaluation of Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Use of Gleevec® (Imatinib Mesilate).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2932-2932
Author(s):  
Ricardo Pasquini ◽  
Nelma C. Clementino ◽  
Maria A. Zanichelli ◽  
Alexandre Nonino ◽  
Acy T. Quixadá ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Advanced Therapy ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
High Level ◽  
Imatinib Mesilate

Abstract Purpose: Imatinib Mesilate is currently considered the most advanced therapy for CML due to its innovative molecular targeting mechanism of action, resulting in a high level of efficacy with a favorable toxicity profile which results in health-related quality of life (HRQL) benefits. We therefore decided to evaluate 230 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with Imatinib Mesilate (Gleevec) as second line therapy, along 12 months, after failing Interferon (IFN) based therapy, due to lack of efficacy or toxicity, in an a Quality of Life (QoL) Study in Brazil, here presented as an interim analysis. Patients and Methods: From July 2002 until December 2003, 230 Patients from 21 Brazilian Medical Institutions, were enrolled in a Quality of Life (QoL) Study, where patients completed FACT-BRM questionnaire at baseline and during treatment. FACT-BRM includes 4 subscales appropriate for any chronic illness or treatment [physical (PWB), social/family (SFWB), emotional (EWB), functional (FWB)] and 2 treatment-specific subscales [BRM-physical (BRMP). The primary endpoint was the composite Trial Outcomes Index (TOI=PWB + FWB +BRMP + BRMCE). The questionnaire was applied at baseline (visit 0),monthly thereafter during the first 6 months on imatinib therapy (visits 1 through 7) and finally after 12 months on treatment (visit 8). Study population was distributed as following: gender 55,9% male and 44,1% female, mean age 46 years (range 18 to 76), Karnofsky status 100% in 56.7% and 80–90% in 29.9%. Initial Imatinib Mesilate dose was 400mg for 81,3% and 600mg for 18,7%. All patients were evaluated at baseline and at visits 7 (six months) and 8 (12 months) 147 (63.9%) and 45 (19.5%) patients were evaluated, respectively. Results: An increase of 5 or more from baseline was defined as a clinically relevant improvement 6. Patients had clinically relevant mean estimated improvement in TOI along treatment. After 1 treatment month TOI had an estimated mean increase of 5.4 (p&lt;0.0001), after 6 months 7.4 (p&lt;0.0001) and after 12 treatment months 9.8 (p&lt;0.0051). TOTAL score improved significantly along treatment, with a clinically relevant mean estimated improvement of 6.5 (p&lt;0.0001) already present after 1 treatment month. Improvement was equal to 8.0 (p=0.0007) and 10.7 (p=0.0369) after 6 and 12 treatment months. There were, also, significant increases in patients’ mean estimated FACTG (p&lt;0.0001), BRMPHY (p&lt;0.0001) and PWB (p&lt;0.0001) along treatment. Conclusion: Imatinib offers remarkable QoL improvement even as a second line treatment in CML as reported previously on IRIS Study, where patients were allowed to cross over to the Imatinib treatment arm, after receiving Interferon based therapy.

Imatinib Suspension and Validation (ISAV) Study: Results at 24 Months

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2775-2775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Mori ◽  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
Bruno Martino ◽  
Ester Pungolino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

Abstract Introduction. A substantial proportion of patients (pts) affected by Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) achieve complete negativity in Q-RT-PCR. In this situation, as already demonstrated in other STOP trials, it is possible to safely discontinue imatinib treatment but it is still not clear how to discriminate subjects who will relapse. In fact even undetectable BCR-ABL may not equate to eradication of the disease because of the sensitivity of Q-RT-PCR. A new diagnostic method, the digital-PCR (dPCR), able to detect 1 BCR-ABL+ cell out of 107 cells, has been developed. Therefore, dPCR by assessing the presence of minimal residual disease with higher sensitivity, could potentially identify pts in whom CML has been eradicated. Aims. The ISAV study is aimed at validating the capability of dPCR to predict relapses after imatinib discontinuation in CML pts with negative Q-RT-PCR results and to evaluate relapse rate and timing of recurrence, survival and the impact of imatinib treatment on Quality of Life (QoL). Methods. This study involves 15 sites, 10 in Italy and 1 in each of the following countries: Germany, Spain, The Netherlands, Canada and Israel. CML pts (Chronic or Accelerated Phase) under imatinib therapy since more than 2 years and in complete molecular remission (CMR) were eligible. Patients had to be in CMR for at least 18 months (mts), with a minimum of 3 Q-RT-PCR performed at their own sites. After signing the informed consent, blood samples were obtained for dPCR and the pts discontinued imatinib therapy. Standard Q-RT-PCR is performed monthly (mts 1-6) and then bimonthly for 36 mts to assess the maintenance of the molecular remission. The loss of molecular remission is defined as two consecutive positive Q-RT-PCR tests with at least one BCR-ABL/ABL value above 0.1%. Patients losing molecular remission resume imatinib treatment at the same dosage used before interruption. Patients' QoL during imatinib discontinuation/resumption is evaluated through the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results. The study enrolled 112 pts with a median follow-up (FUP) time of 28.0 mts [95% CI: 25.5-30.1]. The 59.3% of pts were male and 37.0% were aged 65 or older; median duration of imatinib treatment was 103.1 mts with median duration of CMR of 25.7 mts before imatinib discontinuation. The cumulative probability of survival is 97.8% [95% CI: 91.4-99.5]. dPCR results showed that 23.1% of pts were positive and 75.9% negative, with a significant Negative Predictive Value ratio (dPCR/Q-RT-PCR) of 1.112 [95% CI: 1.009-1.225]. At 24 mts from imatinib discontinuation, 53 pts (49.1%, 95% CI: 39.3-58.9) of the 108 eligible pts relapsed and resumed imatinib; 73.6% of them relapsed in the first 9 mts and the last relapse occurred 21.8 mts after imatinib discontinuation. A loss of CCyR occurred in 13 pts (34.2% of those tested): 10/13 CCyR losses were recovered, the remaining 3 were not assessed for response. No case of CML progression or resistance to imatinib was observed. After the resumption of imatinib the median time to MMR/CMR was 1.9 [95% CI: 1.2-2.4] mts. Of the 55 not-relapsed pts, 42 (38.9% of the total) regained Q-RT-PCR positivity but never lost MMR. The median time to Q-RT-PCR positivity was 2.9 mts [95% CI: 2.0-3.1] in the relapsed pts and 4.5 mts [95% CI: 2.9-6.9] in pts who developed only PCR positivity. No significant correlation between relapse and previous duration of imatinib treatment, use of interferon, time to CCyR, Sokal score or duration of CMR was identified, while an inverse relationship between pts age and risk of relapse is evident. Moreover, age and dPCR results together can predict the risk of relapse: pts with less than 45 years and with a positive dPCR had the highest risk of relapse (100%) as opposed to pts ≥ 45 years and with negative dPCR (36.1%). The analysis of QoL evidenced a statistically significant improvement in the general well-being and symptoms scales at 1 month after imatinib discontinuation and in particular nausea, diarrhea and fatigue (p<0.01). An inverse and transient trend toward increased pain emerged at mts 1 and 3. Conclusions. At 45 mts from the beginning of the study, with a median FUP of 28.0 mts, 49.1% of pts relapsed; the majority of relapses developed in the first 9 mts after imatinib discontinuation. Age < 45 years and dPCR positivity are significantly associated with relapses. QoL analysis showed a significant decrease in symptoms after imatinib discontinuation. Funded by Regione Lombardia. Disclosures Abruzzese: BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Ariad: Consultancy. Assouline:BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. D'Emilio:Celgene: Research Funding. Dong-Wook:ll-Yang: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals First Interim Report of the Italian Multicentric Phase-III Randomized Study to Optimize TKIs Multiple Approaches - (OPTkIMA) in Elderly Patients (older than 60 years) with Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and MR3.0/ MR4.0 Stable Molecular Response

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4251-4251
Author(s):  
Michele Malagola ◽  
Fabio Efficace ◽  
Nicola Polverelli ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
Alessandra Iurlo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
First Year ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Interim Report ◽  
Rt Pcr

Abstract Therapy with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) changed the fate of Philadelphia-positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML). At present, the therapeutic strategy aims to improve the management of the disease and the quality of life of the patients. In July 2015, we started a prospective multicentric randomized trial with the aim to validate the policy of the intermittent de-escalation treatment and to explore the impact of this strategy on the Quality of Life. To this purpose, CML patients older than 60 years in stable (≥2 years) MR3.0 or MR4.0 molecular response were randomized to receive a FIXED intermittent TKIs regimen (one month ON and one month OFF), as previously published (Russo D, Blood 2013; Russo D, BCJ 2015), versus a PROGRESSIVE intermittent TKIs regimen (one month ON and one month OFF for the 1st year; one month ON and two months OFF for the 2nd year; one month ON and three months OFF from the 3rd year) (OPTkIMA study, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02326311). Molecular monitoring was performed according to the 2015 ELN guidelines, every 3 months by RT-PCR on peripheral blood (Baccarani M,Blood 2013). In case of MR3.0 (MMR) loss, checked in two monthly consecutive RT-PCR analysis, patients were planned to exit the study and to resume TKIs daily. This first interim report have been focused on the patients who, by intention to treat, have completed the first year of the study for an historical comparison with the previous INTERIM trial (Russo D, Blood 2013; Russo D, BCJ 2015). During the first year, both the patients randomized in the FIXED and in the PROGRESSIVE arms were given the TKIs treatment one month ON and one month OFF. Up to June 2018, 177 patients have been enrolled by 26 Italian Hematological Centers (first patient randomized in July 2015) and 121/177 patients (68%) completed the first year of OPTkIMA study. The median age was 71 years (range 60-89) and 64% of the patients were belonging to the Sokal intermediate/high risk goup. 96/121 (79%), 14/121 (12%) and 11/121 (9%) patients were receiving imatinib (IMA), nilotinib (NILO) and dasatinib (DAS), at the time of enrollment. Overall, 59/121 (49%) and 62/121 (51%) patients have been randomized in the FIXED and PROGRESSIVE arm, respectively. 41/62 patients (66%) randomly assigned to the PROGRESSIVE arm have entered the second year of therapy. 34/121 patients (28%) went out of the study during the first year. The reasons for protocol discontinuation were: informed consent withdrawn (2 cases), second cancer (4 cases), loss of MR3.0 (28 cases). (Table 1). Among the 28 patients who lost the MMR, 17 and 11 were in MR4.0 and MR3.0, respectively, when they were enrolled into the study. Thus the probability of loosing the MR3.0 while on OPTkIMA was 21,7% at one year (Figure 1). All the 28 patients resumed TKIs continuously and all obtained at least the MR3.0 response, within 6 months and are currently included in the study follow up. The intermittent treatment was well tolerated, with 4 serious adverse events (1 appendicitis, 1 atrial fibrillation, 1 cardiac failure, 1 hip fracture) and 3 adverse events (1 diarrohea, 1 pruritus and 1 fever), none of which have been considered treatement-related. None of the patients experienced the TKI withdrawn syndrome. According to this first interim report, we found that a policy of intermittent TKIs administration in elderly patients is safe and well tolerated. Analysis of patient-reported QoL outcomes is ongoing and will further add information on the overall treatment effectivness of the new PROGRESSIVE intermittent TKI administration. After the 1st year, 28/121 patients (23%) lost MR3.0 and all of them re-gained the major molecular response within 6 months from resumption of continuous treatment. The probability of MR3.0 loss while on OPTkIMA at 1 year was 21,7% and this is quite comparable with the 20% MR3.0 loss observed in the previous INTERIM trial (Russo D, Blood 2013; Russo D, BCJ 2015). Disclosures Efficace: Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Lundbeck: Research Funding; TEVA: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; TEVA: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Bonifacio:Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Castagnetti:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Giai:Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document