scholarly journals Determination of Recommended Phase 2 Dose of ABT-199 (GDC-0199) Combined with Rituximab (R) in Patients with Relapsed / Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 325-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Roberts ◽  
Shuo Ma ◽  
Danielle M. Brander ◽  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
Jacqueline C. Barrientos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Institutional Funding ◽  
Eliza Hall Institute ◽  
Hall Institute

Abstract Introduction: ABT-199 is a selective, orally bioavailable BCL-2 inhibitor that rapidly induces responses in ~80% of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) as a single agent (Seymour, EHA 2014). Rituximab (R) has only modest and short-lived activity as a single-agent in CLL; it can enhance the activity of other agents with minimal additional toxicity. ABT-199 and R demonstrate synergy in preclinical models of CD20-positive lymphoid malignancies, and the combination has the potential to improve efficacy. Methods: Primary objectives of this phase 1b, open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RPTD) of ABT-199 + R in pts with R/R CLL/SLL and evaluate the safety profile; secondary objectives examine the pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of the combination. Eligible pts began treatment with 20 or 50 mg ABT-199 (modified to 20 mg during the study) daily, with weekly increases in a ramp-up phase to a final cohort dose of 200 - 600 mg. After completion of the ramp-up phase, R was added starting at 375 mg/m2 and then 500 mg/m2 monthly for a total of 6 doses. ABT-199 was continued daily until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.0. The MTD was determined using the Continual Reassessment Method. Responses were assessed using established criteria for CLL/SLL, including CT scan at month 3 and CT scan and bone marrow (BM) biopsy at the end of combination therapy. MRD was assessed using four color flow cytometry in peripheral blood (PB) and/or BM aspirate ≥2 months after response criteria were first met, and in PB every 12 weeks until MRD negativity was achieved. Results: As of July 6, 2014, 49 pts enrolled in 5 dose escalation cohorts (n = 41) and a safety expansion cohort (n = 8), with a median time on study of 201 days (1 – 624). Median age was 68 years (range 50–88) and 30 (61%) were male. The median number of prior therapies was 3 (1–10). Thirteen (27%) had fludarabine-refractory disease and 9 (18%) R-refractory. Nine (18%) had del (17p) and 19/27 (70%) with available data had unmutated IGVH. Thirteen pts have discontinued therapy: 6 due to PD; 3 after attaining complete remission; 2 due to AEs and 2 withdrew consent. Preliminary PK data suggest a negligible effect of R on ABT-199 exposure. The most common overall treatment-emergent AEs (>25% pts) were neutropenia (47%), nausea (41%), diarrhea (37%), pyrexia (31%), headache (31%), fatigue, upper respiratory tract infection, and cough (each 29%). The most common overall grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (47%), thrombocytopenia (16%), and anemia (14%). Treatment-emergent SAEs occurred in 20 (41%) pts; the most common were pyrexia (6%), and febrile neutropenia, infusion-related reaction, TLS, and Richter's Transformation (each 4%). Six pts experienced a DLT: 1 febrile neutropenia (200mg), 1 each thrombocytopenia, hematophagocytic syndrome, neutropenia (300mg), 1 neutropenia (600mg), and 1 pt experienced a fatal event of hyperkalemia in the setting of TLS after the first dose (50mg). That event led to a modified dosing scheme; no TLS was observed in the 32 subsequent pts using the revised ramp up dosing scheme. No MTD was identified. Of 34 pts who were evaluable for response in dose escalation cohorts, the overall response rate (ORR) was 88%, with 11 (32%) achieving a CR/CRi and 20 (56%) achieving a partial response (PR). MRD was quantified by local laboratory in 19 pts. Thirteen pts (7 in CR (6 at 10-4 and 1 at 10-3 sensitivity) and 6 in PR (10-4 sensitivity)) were MRD negative in bone marrow while one was MRD negative in peripheral blood (10-4 sensitivity). The RPTD of ABT-199 is 400 mg daily based on safety data; key safety and efficacy data for the dose selection are summarized in the table. Conclusions: The combination of ABT-199 and R is well-tolerated and achieves an overall response rate of 86% with 31% CRs in pts with CLL/SLL. Efficacy was observed across all dose cohorts. The RPTD of ABT-199 is 400mg daily, supported by a trend of lower rates of neutropenia and GI toxicity events in the absence of a clear difference in efficacy, compared to the higher doses. A phase 3 trial comparing ABT-199 and R versus bendamustine and R in pts with previously treated CLL is underway. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Roberts: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research : Employment, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Ma:Genentech: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding. Kipps:AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Barrientos:Gilead: institutional funding Other; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, institutional funding, institutional funding Other; AbbVie: institutional funding, institutional funding Other; Celgene: Consultancy. Davids:Genentech: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research: Employment, milestone payments related to ABT-199 Other; AbbVie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Tam:Roche: Honoraria. Mason-Bright:AbbVie : Employment. Rudersdorf:AbbVie: Employment. Gressick:AbbVie: Employment. Yang:AbbVie, Inc: Employment. Munasinghe:AbbVie: Employment. Zhu:AbbVie, Inc: Employment. Cerri:AbbVie: Employment. Enschede:AbbVie, Inc: Employment. Humerickhouse:AbbVie, Inc: Employment. Seymour:AbbVie: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy.

Phase 2 Study of MLN8237, An Investigational Aurora A Kinase (AAK) Inhibitor In Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) or Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3273-3273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart L Goldberg ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Michael D Craig ◽  
Emmanuel Gyan ◽  
John Lister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Investigational Agent ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3273 Background: AAK is essential for mitotic progression and is amplified or overexpressed in AML and other hematologic malignancies. The investigational agent MLN8237 is an orally available, potent, and selective AAK inhibitor with preclinical activity against leukemias, lymphomas, and myeloma. Phase 1–2 and pharmacodynamic results show a mechanism of selective AAK inhibition, and some durable clinical activity in patients with treatment-resistant malignancies. Methods: Open-label, multicenter, phase 2 trial (NCT00830518) of MLN8237 in patients aged ≥18 years with advanced AML or intermediate-2/high-risk MDS. Eligibility criteria included ECOG performance status 0–2, adequate organ function, and >10% blasts in bone marrow. Patients were not excluded based on number of prior therapies, treatment with hydroxyurea or steroids, prior transplant, or ongoing cytopenias. Patients received 21-day cycles of MLN8237 50 mg BID for 7 days followed by 14 days' rest until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate, defined as complete (CR) plus partial (PR) response, which included CR (CRi) or PR (PRi) with incomplete blood count recovery in AML patients and marrow CR or PRi in MDS patients. Response was evaluated by modified AML/MDS international working group (IWG) criteria; stable disease was defined as failure to achieve PRi but no evidence of progression in AML patients, and as failure to achieve PR but no evidence of progression for >8 weeks in MDS patients. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0. Results: 57 patients were enrolled; median age was 72 years (range 46–85), 56% were male, and 81% white. Forty-six (81%) patients had AML, of whom 21 (37%) had secondary leukemia. Of 11 (19%) patients with MDS, 8 had an IPSS score of intermediate-2 (1.5 or 2.0), and 3 had a high (≥2.5) score. Forty-nine (86%) patients had received prior therapies, and 9 (16%) received ≥3 prior therapies. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (range 1–16) of MLN8237. Treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs were seen in 24 (42%) patients and included febrile neutropenia (11%), thrombocytopenia (9%), anemia (9%), fatigue (7%), and neutropenia (7%). Treatment-emergent somnolence was identified in 14 (25%) patients, and grade 3/4 treatment-related somnolence was reported in 2 (4%) patients. Fourteen (25%) patients discontinued due to AEs. Twenty-two on-study deaths were reported, caused by events unrelated to MLN8237, including progressive disease (46%), and sepsis (14%); of these, 9 deaths from AML occurred within 2 months of study entry. Overall, 6 (13%) responses were observed (all AML patients; response-evaluable population n=45); 5 patients had PR. One CR was documented in a 79-year old female with AML and no prior therapy, who presented with 23% bone marrow blasts at the time of progression from MDS/RAEB-2, and remains in CR through 16 cycles (1 year). Seventeen (49%) AML and 2 MDS (20%) patients achieved stable disease. Ongoing analyses suggest that co-morbidities influenced clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Data suggest that single-agent MLN8237 has anti-leukemia activity with a 13% response rate (all AML) in this clinical study of patients with advanced, mainly pre-treated disease. In patients with rapidly progressive disease, these results indicate that improved outcomes require strategies to enhance both disease control and risk management in early cycles, allowing time needed to achieve clinical benefit from AAK inhibition. These results support further clinical studies of MLN8237 in heme-lymphatic malignancies and solid tumors. Disclosures: Goldberg: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Investigational agent in clinical development for the treatment of AML/MDS. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Craig:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gyan:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Celegene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Schiller:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Jung: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Leonard:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Fingert:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Westervelt:Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Twice Weekly Induction with Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (IRd) Combination Followed By Extended IRD Consolidation and Lenalidomide Maintenance in Transplant Eligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): A Phase 2 Study from the Intergroupe Francophone Du Myelome (IFM 2014-03)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3159-3159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murielle Roussel ◽  
Benjamin Hebraud ◽  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Xavier Leleu ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response

Background: triplet combinations comprising a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) are current standard induction and consolidation regimens in NDMM. The all-oral combination of weekly ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) has been evaluated by several groups in NDMM and is approved in relapsed-refractory MM. The IFM 2014-01 phase 2 trial previously studied the weekly IRd regimen as induction and extended consolidation followed by single-agent ixazomib maintenance in frontline transplant eligible patients (Moreau et al ASH meeting 2016): IRd was well tolerated and overall response rate was 81%, including 38% very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) at the completion of induction (3 cycles). Responses further increased at each step of the program and 76% of patients (per protocole analysis) achieved ≥VGPR before maintenance with 6% CR and 38% sCR. To stay in line with current RVd regimen, and to increase dose intensity, we examined the efficacy and safety of twice-weekly ixazomib +Rd as induction prior to transplant, followed by weekly IRd consolidation and single-agent lenalidomide maintenance (NCT02897830). Methods: This is a phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter study. During induction, patients received three 21-day cycles of twice-weekly oral IRd: ixazomib (3 mg on days 1, 4, 8 and 11), lenalidomide (25 mg daily, days 1-14), and dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 4, 8 and 11) followed by transplant. Patients then received two 28-day cycles of weekly IRd early consolidation followed by 6 additional cycles of IR (no dexamethasone) as late consolidation (ixazomib 4mg on days 1-8 and 15; lenalidomide 25mg daily, days 1-21). Single-agent lenalidomide maintenance was administered for up to 1 year (10 mg daily, days 1-21). The primary endpoint was the stringent complete response (sCR) rate at the completion of consolidation. The secondary endpoints included assessments of overall response rate (ORR) and rates of response categories at each step of the program, progression-free survival (PFS), feasibility and safety. Responses were assessed in accordance with the IMWG uniform criteria. Toxicity was evaluated according to NCI CTCAE, version 4.03. Results Between 07/2016 and 08/2017, 50 patients with NDMM were screened at 10 IFM centers, 46 were enrolled with a median age of 59 years, and 59% were male. The percentages of patients with ISS stage I, II, and III were 41.5%, 41.5%, and 17%, respectively. High-risk cytogenetics, defined as t (4; 14), or del17p (central Lab, H. Avet-Loiseau), was observed in 9% of patients (6.5% FISH failure). As of July 1st 2019 (data cut-off), 10 patients prematurely discontinued therapy. Considering efficacy, 43/46 patients (94%) completed consolidation and 9 achieved sCR (20.9%; 90% CI [11.4 to 33.7]). This result did not meet the minimum efficacy threshold (40%) for the primary efficacy endpoint (p=0.998). Overall, at the completion of consolidation, ORR was 91% including 21% sCR, 30% ≥CR and 58%≥VGPR. Responses at each step of the program are described in the table 1. If we focus on twice-weekly IRd induction, at the completion of 3 cycles, ORR was 74%, including 33% ≥VGPR. The feasibility of the program was good and overall, 39/46 patients (85%) were able to receive maintenance therapy with single-agent lenalidomide. After a median follow-up of 22 months, 7 patients progressed and 3 patients died. Concerning safety: 31 serious treatment emergent AEs were reported in 20 patients (43.5%) comprising infections (8 patients), cardiac disorders (2 patients: ischemic heart disease and aortic valve incompetence), psychiatric, renal and respiratory disorders (2 cases each). No grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy was described. Conclusions The all-oral Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (IRd) induction/consolidation regimen in the transplant setting is convenient, well tolerated, leading to 21% sCR before maintenance. Twice-weekly IRd induction does not seem superior to weekly IRd induction Results on response rates following maintenance and MRD data will be presented during the meeting. Table Disclosures Roussel: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; takeda: Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding. Hebraud:celgene: Other: travel fees, lecture fees; takeda: Other: travel fees, lecture fees. Hulin:Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Leleu:Oncopeptide: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Carsgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Facon:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Touzeau:celgene: Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; takeda: Other: travel fees, lecture fees. Perrot:jannsen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria. Stoppa:celgene: Other: travel fees, lecture fees; takeda: Other: travel fees. Moreau:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Avet-Loiseau:takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding. Attal:celgene: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is indicated in RRMM in association with Rd

scholarly journals High Major Response Rate, Including Very Good Partial Responses (VGPR), in Patients (pts) with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) Treated with the Highly Specific BTK Inhibitor Bgb-3111: Expansion Phase Results from an Ongoing Phase I Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1216-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantine S. Tam ◽  
Judith Trotman ◽  
Stephen Opat ◽  
Paula Marlton ◽  
Gavin Cull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Research ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Major Response ◽  
Btk Inhibitor ◽  
Eliza Hall Institute ◽  
Hall Institute

Abstract Introduction: The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib (IB) is highly active in WM, achieving major responses (CR+VGPR+PR) in approximately 70% of pts. However, VGPR is infrequent, with rates ≤15% in reported series (Treon NEJM 2015, Dimopoulos EHA 2016). BGB-3111 is a potent, highly-specific and irreversible BTK inhibitor, with greater selectivity than IB for BTK vs. other TEC- and HER-family kinases, and superior bioavailability. We previously reported that the recommended phase 2 dose of BGB-3111 is 320mg daily (in single or split dose) in pts with advanced B cell malignancies. This achieves plasma levels equivalent to 6-10 fold that of IB, and >90% continuous inhibition of BTK in lymph node biopsies. We specifically investigated the safety and efficacy of BGB-3111 in pts with WM in an expansion cohort of the initial Phase 1 trial. Reported here are updated results of this study, including data from WM specific expansion cohorts. Aims: To define the safety profile, and clinical activity of BGB-3111 in pts with WM. Methods: These results are from a pre-specified a component of a Phase 1 study (Part 1: dose escalation [DEsc] in pts with R/R B cell malignancies, Part 2: disease-specific dose expansion cohorts [EC] at the recommended Phase 2 dose that included patients with relapsed / refractory or previously untreated WM). Adverse events (AEs) were reported per CTCAE v4.03. Responses were determined according to the modified Sixth International Workshop on WM (IWWM) criteria. The data cut-off is 10 June 2016. Results: As of 10 June 2016, 31 pts with WM have been enrolled; 6 pts in DEsc (40mg [n=2], 80mg [n=2], 160mg QD [n=1], and 320mg QD [n=1]), and 25 in the WM EC (160mg BID [n=18], 320mg QD [n=7]). Three pts in DEsc were increased to 160mg QD after analysis of DEsc data, as allowed by protocol. Twenty-four pts are included in this analysis; 5 pts were excluded because of short (<60 day) follow-up for safety and efficacy, and 2 pts accrued at a single site were excluded because of insufficient documentation at baseline. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and prior treatment history are summarized in Table 1. BGB-3111 was well tolerated with 71% reporting no drug related AE >Gr 1 severity within the first 12 weeks of therapy. The most frequent AEs (>20%) of any attribution (all Gr 1/2) were upper respiratory infection (25%), diarrhea (25%), and nausea (21%). There were 2 SAEs assessed as possibly related to BGB-3111 (Gr 2 atrial fibrillation, Gr 3 cryptococcal meningitis); in both cases, BGB-3111 was temporarily held but safely resumed. In total, 2 pts developed AF (one Gr 1, one Gr 2). No serious hemorrhage (≥Gr 3 or CNS hemorrhage of any grade) was reported. After a median follow-up of 7.6 months (2-21 months), the response rate was 92% (22/24). The major response rate was 83% (20/24), with VGPR (>90% reduction in IgM and reduction in extramedullary disease) in 33% (8/24) and PR (50-90% reduction in IgM and reduction in extramedullary disease) in 50% (12/24) pts. Pts with WM refractory to their last therapy were equally responsive: major response 77% [10/13], VGPR 31% [4/13], PR 46% [6/13]. Median time to initial response and major response were 29 days and 34 days, respectively. IgM decreased from a median of 29.9g/l at baseline to 3.0g/l; hemoglobin increased from a median of 10.1 g/dl at baseline to 13.5g/l. Two of 3 pts who had a dose increase after reaching a stable IgM plateau had further falls in IgM levels after dose escalation. Kinetics of IgM and hemoglobin response are presented in Figure 1. Lymphadenopathy was present in 8 pts at baseline; serial CT demonstrated reduction or resolution in all 8 pts (27%-100% reduction in SPD). Only one patient discontinued BGB-3111, due to exacerbation of pre-existing bronchiectasis while in VGPR. There have been no cases of disease progression. Analysis of response by genomic characteristics (including MYD88 and CXCR4 mutational status) is ongoing. Conclusions: BGB-3111 is well-tolerated and highly active in WM. The depth and quality of responses, as reflected by the VGPR rate of 33%, warrant a randomized comparison against ibrutinib in pts with WM. Table 1. Table 1. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Tam: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Opat:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Provision of subsidised drugs, Research Funding. Simpson:Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene, Roche, Janssen: Honoraria. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research: Other: Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research receives milestone payments for the development of venetoclax. Kirschbaum:Beigene: Employment. Wang:Beigene: Employment. Xue:Beigene: Employment. Yang:BeiGene: Employment. Hedrick:Beigene: Employment. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roberts:AbbVie: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Patents & Royalties: Employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research which receives milestone payments related to venetoclax.

SDX-105 Demonstrates a High Response Rate as a Single-Agent with Acceptable Safety in Rituximab-Refractory, Relpased Indolent or Transformed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2480-2480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Friedberg ◽  
Philip Cohen ◽  
Robert O. Kerr ◽  
K. Sue Robinson ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Cell Death Pathway ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract SDX-105 (Treanda™, Bendamustine HCl) is an alkylating agent that may exert its anti-tumor activity via mitotic catastrophe, an apoptosis-independent cell-death pathway, as well as, through apoptosis. Its cytotoxic potency is unattenuated in chemotherapy-resistant lymphoma cell lines. We initiated a multi-center Phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of SDX-105 in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent or transformed B cell NHL. Patients must have pathologically-confirmed disease that has been demonstrated to be rituximab-refractory (no response or progression within 6 months) or must be intolerant of rituximab. Other requirements include measurable disease, adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function (ANC ≥1K/mm3, platelet ≥ 100K/mm3, except in cases of &gt;50% NHL in bone marrow), up to 3 prior chemotherapies, and no prior allogeneic transplant. Patients receive SDX-105, 120 mg/m2 IV over 30–60 min, days 1 and 2, every 21 days. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity during a cycle results in dose reduction for subsequent cycles (to 90 mg/m2 and then to 60 mg/m2). Patients achieving stable disease or better after 6 cycles may receive up to 6 more cycles. 49 patients have been accrued to date with data available on the first 15 patients. The median age is 69 yrs (range 47–84), 47% male, median 6 yrs since diagnosis with NHL. Histologies: 10 follicular (6 Grade 1, 3 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3), 2 SLL, 1 marginal zone and 2 transformed NHL. Other features include: 93% Stage III/IV, 20% with B symptoms, 87% with extranodal disease, median 2 prior chemotherapies with 40% not responding to last chemotherapy. 4 patients have required dose reduction to 90 mg/m2 and 2 patients have withdrawn prior to completing 6 cycles due to treatment-associated toxicity. The current overall response rate (ORR) based upon best response in the intent-to-treat population is 80% (CR/CRu 20%, PR 60%). Overall 73% of patients experienced a related non-hematologic adverse event (AE), of which 20% were Grade 3 and 0% Grade 4. The most frequent AEs were nausea (40%), vomiting (27%), fatigue (33%), anorexia (20%), and constipation (20%). Alopecia was not observed. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 53% (neutropenia), 20% (thrombocytopenia), and 13% (anemia) of patients. 4 patients experienced serious AEs, including 1 patient with baseline renal insufficiency who died on study from renal failure and pulmonary edema; other events include admissions for fever and anemia, urinary tract infection, and dehydration. Based upon these preliminary findings, SDX-105 demonstrates a high overall response rate with acceptable hematologic toxicity and modest non-hematologic toxicity in a relapsed lymphoma patient population, many of whom are refractory to rituximab-chemotherapy combinations. An additional study evaluating the combination of SDX-105 and rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent NHL who are rituximab-sensitive is also ongoing.

A Phase II Trial of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor Everolimus (RAD001) in Relapsed or Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 587-587
Author(s):  
Irene M Ghobrial ◽  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Betsy LaPlant ◽  
John Camoriano ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Waldenström’S Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Abstract Abstract 587 Background: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction pathway controls cell proliferation and survival. Everolimus is an oral agent targeting raptor mTOR (mTORC1). The trial's goal was to determine the anti-tumor activity and safety of single-agent everolimus in patients with relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had measurable disease (IgM monoclonal protein >1000 mg/dL with >10% marrow involvement or nodal masses >2 cm), a platelet count ≥75,000 × 106/L, a neutrophil count ≥1,000 × 106/L, and a creatinine and bilirubin ≤2x laboratory upper limit of normal. Patients received everolimus 10 mg PO daily and were evaluated monthly. Tumor response was assessed after cycles 2 and 6 and then every 3 cycles until progression. Results: 50 pts were treated. The median age was 63 years (range, 43-85). The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 70% (95% CI: 55-82%), with a PR of 42% and 28% MR. The median duration of response and median progression-free survival (PFS) has not been reached. The estimated PFS at 6 and 12 months is 75% (95%CI: 64-89%) and 62% (95%CI: 48-80%), respectively. Grade 3 or higher related toxicities were observed in 56% of patients. The most common were hematological toxicities with cytopenias. Pulmonary toxicity occurred in 10% of patients. Dose reductions due to toxicity occurred in 52% of patients. Conclusions: Everolimus has high single-agent activity with an overall response rate of 70% and manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed WM, and offers a potential new therapeutic strategy for this patient group. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Gertz:celgene: Honoraria; millenium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Treon:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Witzig:Novartis: Research Funding.

Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR): A Phase 1 Study In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2455-2455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
Lode J. Swinnen ◽  
Jianning Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Abstract 2455 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule, binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. In vitro, navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50 ≤ 1μM) against T and B lymphoid malignancies that over-express Bcl-2. A phase 1 trial demonstrated oral navitoclax monotherapy to be well-tolerated and to have anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, thrombocytopenia (TCP) was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Phase 3 studies showed improved outcomes in CLL pts with the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) combination, and a phase 2 trial showed bendamustine/rituximab (BR) to be effective for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Navitoclax enhanced R (monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy) efficacy in preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma. Methods: This is an ongoing, international, phase 1 dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral navitoclax in combination with FCR (Arm A) or BR (Arm B) in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. Secondary objectives are efficacy endpoints (PFS, ORR, TTP, OS, duration of response). Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance score ≤1, ANC ≥100/μL, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL. Preliminary results are reported. After obtaining informed consent, pts were assigned to Arm A or Arm B based on physician preference, each consisting of 28-day dose-escalation cycles with once-daily, pre-infusion, navitoclax treatment on Days 3–5 of Cycle 1 and Days 1–3 of subsequent cycles. In both arms, R was 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycle 1; and 500 mg/m2 on Day 2 of Cycle 2 and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles. In Arm A, F 25 mg/m2 and C 175 mg/m2 were dosed on Days 2–4 in Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1–3 in subsequent cycles. In Arm B, B was dosed at 70 mg/m2 on Days 2 and 3 of Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1 and 2 in subsequent cycles. Navitoclax starting dose was 110 mg daily. Dose escalation to the next cohort (200 mg) was according to a continuous reassessment model. Tumor responses were evaluated using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Pts could continue on navitoclax therapy for 1 yr in the absence of progressive disease or significant toxicity. Results: As of July 2010, 7 pts enrolled in the initially prioritized Arm B (BR+navitoclax); all completed the first cohort of 110 mg (median age 60 yr [range 55–72]). Study sites are currently enrolling pts in Arm A (FCR+navitoclax); 2 pts have enrolled to date. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–7). One pt had a DLT of elevated AST (Arm B, 110 mg cohort) and 1 pt had a DLT of neutropenic fever (Arm A, 110 mg cohort). In Arm B, neither TCP nor neutropenia have been DLTs. For the 7 pts with navitoclax-related AEs, the most common were diarrhea (3 pts), nausea (5 pts), and fatigue (3 pts). Seven pts remain on study; 2 pts discontinued due to disease progression and 2 withdrew per physician preference. In Arm B, preliminary antitumor best responses were assessable in 4 pts who received 2 cycles; 1 CRi in a pt with del17p- (based on lymph node [LN] response and no morphologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow), 2 unconfirmed CRs (based on LN response and no bone marrow at this time), and 1 PR in a pt with del17p- (this pt subsequently received an allogeneic stem cell transplant). Preliminary PK results for the Arm B 110 mg cohort indicated that navitoclax PK was similar in Cycle 1 (navitoclax+BR) and Cycle 2 (navitoclax alone), and appeared comparable to PK in the navitoclax monotherapy study. Conclusions: Early results show that the combination of navitoclax with BR is well-tolerated, without DLTs of TCP or neutropenia, and show evidence of anti-tumor activity. Data are limited in the FCR portion of the study. The maximum tolerated dose of navitoclax has not been reached. Accrual is ongoing and following completion of the dose-escalation components of this study, expanded cohorts of pts will be assessed using the recommended phase 2 dose of navitoclax to further assess the tolerability and dose, and to continue to explore for efficacy signals in combinations. Preliminary data in combination with BR are encouraging. Disclosures: Kipps: Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Wierda: Abbott: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jones: Glaxo Smith-Kline: Consultancy; Abbott: Research Funding. Swinnen: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yang: Abbott: Employment. Cui: Abbott: Employment. Busman: Abbott: Employment. Krivoshik: Abbott: Employment. Enschede: Abbott: Employment. Humerickhouse: Abbott: Employment.

Phase 2 Trial of PRM-151, an Anti-Fibrotic Agent, in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Stage 1 Results

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 713-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Ruben A. Mesa ◽  
Lynda M Foltz ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
John O Mascarenhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Jak Inhibitor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract PRM-151 (PRM) is a recombinant form of Pentraxin-2, an endogenous human protein that acts at sites of tissue damage, inducing macrophage differentiation to prevent and reverse fibrosis. PRM has broad anti-fibrotic activity in multiple preclinical models of established fibrotic diseases and no dose limiting toxicities in phase 1 trials. Myelofibrosis (MF: primary (PMF), post-essential thrombocythemia (post-ET MF), and post polycythemia vera (Post PV MF)) is a myeloid malignancy characterized by progressive bone marrow (BM) fibrosis with resultant anemia, abnormal platelet and leukocyte counts, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and a well-defined symptom complex. This study investigated the potential of PRM in MF to reduce BM fibrosis and to improve key disease features including abnormal blood counts, symptoms, and splenomegaly. MF patients (pts) with Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) intermediate-1, intermediate-2, or high-risk disease and grade ≥ 2 BM fibrosis, either on no current therapy or on a stable dose of ruxolitinib (RUX) for ≥ 12 weeks and no improvement in spleen for ≥ 4 weeks, were eligible for stage 1 of this open-label adaptive trial. Assignment to one of the 4 treatment arms was per investigator and pt choice: PRM 10 mg/kg IV 1-hour infusion days 1, 3, 5, then weekly (QW) or every 4 weeks (Q4W), alone or with RUX, for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was overall response rate by IWG-MRT (symptoms by MPN-SAF Total Symptom Score (TSS), spleen by palpation) and/or decrease in BM fibrosis by ≥ 1 grade with otherwise stable disease. BM biopsies were obtained at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and were evaluated centrally by two blinded hematopathologists. Pts with clinical benefit were allowed to continue treatment in an extension. At least one response in any arm was required for that regimen to be evaluated in Stage 2. Twenty seven pts were enrolled: 8 PRM QW, 7 PRM Q4W, 6 PRM QW + RUX, 6 PRM Q4W + RUX. Median age 67 years (52-85); 70% DIPSS Int-2 or High Risk; 52% PMF, 15% post-ET MF, 33% post-PV MF; 63% grade 3 BM fibrosis, Hemoglobin (Hgb) < 100 g/L in 56% and < 85 g/L in 26%, platelet count (PLT)< 100 x 109/L in 52% and < 25 x 109/L in 30%; 22% were JAK inhibitor-naive and 52% had received a prior JAK inhibitor (not including ongoing RUX). Twenty pts completed 24 weeks of therapy; 18 continued extension treatment. PRM-151 was well-tolerated alone and with RUX; most adverse events (AEs) were Grade 1/2 and unrelated, with 3 Grade 3 possibly related AEs and 5 possibly related serious AEs. Nine of 26 evaluable pts responded, for an overall response rate (ORR) of 35%, with 4 IWG symptom clinical improvements (CI) and 6 BM fibrosis responses (Table 1), with ≥ 1 response in each arm. One pt had a CI and BM response. Reduction in BM fibrosis was associated with normal erythroid microarchitecture, normal or decreased myeloid:erythroid ratio, and fewer paratrabecular megakaryocytes, all potential surrogates of improved bone marrow microenvironment. IWG stable disease was observed in 77% of pts, with trends of clinical benefit in Hgb, PLT, peripheral blood blasts, spleen, and symptoms (Table 2). In 14 patients (54%), all parameters were stable or improved. Conclusion: PRM-151 was well-tolerated in patients with advanced MF, with no evidence of drug-related myelosuppression and encouraging trends in both clinical and histologic aspects of the disease. Reduction in BM fibrosis, stable to improved hematologic parameters, symptom responses, and stable to reduced spleen size support further development of PRM-151 in MF. Table 1 Two additional subjects had decrease in bone marrow fibrosis but progressive disease. Number of Patients BM Fibrosis Grade at Last Study Timepoint 3 2 1 BM Fibrosis Grade at Baseline 3 8 3 1 2 1 4 2 Abstract 713. Table 2 Outcome Parameter Denominator (n) Clinical Benefit Pts with Improvement (n/%) ORR (primary endpoint) All evaluable pts (26) IWG-MRT CI AND/OR reduction in BM fibrosis by ≥ 1 grade 9 (35%) Hgb Hgb < 100 g/L (15) ≥10 g/L increase from baseline AND no transfusions or 50% reduction in transfusions if transfusion dependent 6 (40%) PLT PLT < 100 x 109/L (13) > 100 x 109/L AND increase of ≥20 x 109/L ; increase of ≥20 x 109/L if baseline < 50, AND/OR increase of ≥ 10 x 109/L with discontinuation of transfusions 8 (62%) Blasts ≥ 1% peripheral blasts (14) No peripheral blasts 3 (21%) Symptoms All evaluable pts (26) ≥ 25% reduction in TSS ≥ 12 weeks 10 (38%) Spleen Palpable spleen (19) ≥ 25% decrease ≥ 4 weeks AND any decrease ≥ 12 weeks 5 (26%) Disclosures Verstovsek: Incyte: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Lilly Oncology: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte, CTI, NS pharma, Gilead, Celgene: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding. Foltz:Janssen: Consultancy; Promedior: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gupta:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding. Mascarenhas:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding. Ritchie:Celgene, Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Promedior: Research Funding. Hoffman:Geron: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; All Cells LLC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Promedior: Research Funding. Pozdnyakova:Sanofi: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy. Hasserjian:Sanofi: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Promedior: Consultancy. Trehu:Promedior: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:ARIAD, Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding. Gotlib:Novartis: Research Funding, Travel Reimbursement, Travel Reimbursement Other; Sanofi: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Reimbursement Other; Promedior: Research Funding.

Phase I/II study of R-ICE (rituximab-ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide) with lenalidomide (R2-ICE) in patients with first-relapse/primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in academic and community cancer research united (ACCRU) network.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8073-TPS8073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Guerra-Bauman ◽  
Betsy LaPlant ◽  
William R. Macon ◽  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
Umar Farooq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Lymphoma Therapy

TPS8073 Background: Response rates to salvage immunochemotherapy in patients with DLBCL relapsing after or refractory (R/R DLBCL) to front line therapy remain unsatisfactory. Lenalidomide (Len) has significant single agent activity in relapsed/refractory DLBCL. The addition of lenalidomide (Len) days 1-7 to rituximab plus ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide (RICE) was shown to be feasible with promising efficacy in phase 1b study (Feldman T, et al. BJH, 2014). We developed phase I/II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of Len (extended to 14 day schedule) to RICE (R2-ICE) for R/R-DLBCL patients who are candidates for stem cell transplant. Methods: The phase I portion was designed to determine the maximally tolerated dose Len in combination with RICE using the standard cohort 3+3 design. The escalation dose levels were 15 mg and 20 mg daily x 14 days. Prophylactic aspirin and growth factor support is mandatory. After 2 cycles of therapy response is evaluated with a PET/CT scan; the responding patients are eligible for 1-2 additional cycles of R2ICE as a bridging before HDC/SCT. The estimated overall response rate for two cycles of R-ICE in R/R DLBCL to RCHOP was estimated to be approximate 45%. We hypothesize that the addition of lenalidomide in the relapse setting could increase the overall response rate by approximately 20%. The one-stage design with an interim analysis being utilized in phase 2 requires 45 evaluable patients (one sided alpha = 0.09, power 90%). For Phase I, all types of B-cell lymphomas were eligible. For phase II portion only DLBCL patients are eligible per central pathology review. Other eligibility criteria include: received one line of previous anti-lymphoma therapy, ≥ 2 weeks from completion of prior anti-lymphoma therapy, candidate for HDC and SCT, adequate organ (creatinine clearance ≥ 60ml/min by Cockcroft-, total bilirubin ≤ 2 × ULN) and bone marrow function (ANC) ≥1500/mm3; platelet count ≥75,000/mm3). The use of steroids and/or rituximab up to 1 week prior to registration for management of symptoms is allowed. 9 patients cleared phase 1 without DLT and dose of 20 mg days 1 -14 was recommend for phase 2 part (RP2D) of the study. The phase 2 study passed interim futility analysis and accrual continues. Correlatives include cell of origin by Nanostring, Myc/bcl2 expression and by FISH and minimal residual disease. PET scans are centrally reviewed including metabolic tumor volume. Clinical trial information: NCT02628405 .

Phase 1/1b Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Panobinostat + Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4081-4081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J. Shah ◽  
Sheeba K. Thomas ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
Raymond Alexanian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Elevated Creatinine

Abstract Abstract 4081 Background: Carfilzomib, a novel irreversible proteasome inhibitor (PI), has demonstrated single agent activity in, and was recently FDA approved for relapsed and refractory myeloma. Panobinostat, a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), has been studied as a single agent and in combination with bortezomib, demonstrating promising response rates and a favorable safety profile in bortezomib-refractory patients. Our hypothesis proposed that the combination of carfilzomib and panobinostat (Car-Pan) would also be highly active, and we therefore aimed to combine these two agents for the first time. We report the initial findings from the phase I dose-escalation and expansion portions of our phase I/II trial of this novel combination regimen. Methods: The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety/tolerability of Car-Pan in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Secondary objectives included determination of the overall response rate, time to progression, progression free survival, and time to next therapy. Panobinostat was administered orally on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12 of every 28-day cycle, while carfilzomib was given intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Dose level 1 started carfilzomib at 20 mg/m2 with 15 mg of panobinostat, and escalated from there using a standard 3+3 schema based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. An amendment was later introduced to allow carfilzomib to be given at 20 mg/m2for days 1 and 2 of cycle 1, followed by an increase to the full dose level for that cohort. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the NCI-CTCAE v4, and responses were assessed with the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: To date, 20 patients have been enrolled, 3 of whom are still in their first cycle, leaving 17 evaluable patients who are described herein, who have received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–8). The median age was 62 years (range 46–73), 11/17 (70%) were male, and the median number of prior regimens was 5 (range 2–15). Patients were very heavily pretreated, with 16/17 (94%) having undergone stem cell transplantation, 16/17 (94%) having prior bortezomib, including 8/17 (47%) who were bortezomib-refractory, and 17/17 (100%) having prior lenalidomide, including 12/17 (70%) who were lenalidomide-refractory. Cytogenetic abnormalities were common, including: 4 with del(17p), 4 with t(4;14), 2 with t(11;14), 9 with del(13), of whom 7 had additional mutations. Grade 1–4 AEs regardless of causality occurring in >20% of patients included anemia (14/17), thrombocytopenia (17/17), neutropenia (8/17), diarrhea (9/17), nausea/emesis (7/17), fatigue (10/17), elevated creatinine (8/17), and pneumonia (5/17). Grade ≥3 AEs regardless of causality included anemia (7/17), thrombocytopenia (10/17), neutropenia (6/17), diarrhea (2/17), nausea/emesis (1/17), fatigue (4/17), elevated creatinine (2/17), and pneumonia (4/17). An MTD has not been established, and dosing is ongoing in cohort 4, with Carfilzomib at 45mg/m2and 20 mg of Panobinostat. Of the 17 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 35% (6/17) who achieved at least a partial response (PR); including 2 with very good PR (VGPR). In addition, one patient had a minor response, and 65% overall achieved stable disease or better. Conclusions: The combination of Carfilzomib + Panobinostat is well tolerated with a manageable side effect profile. Importantly, the combination achieves a promising response rate in a very heavily pre-treated, lenalidomide/bortezomib/high dose melphalan-refractory population, with an overall response (≥PR) rate of 35%. Updated safety and efficacy data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: This presentation will include information about panobinostat, which is not yet approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma. Thomas:Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wang:Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Orlowski:Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Safety Profile and Clinical Response To MEDI-551, a Humanized Monoclonal Anti-CD19, In a Phase 1/2 Study In Adults With Relapsed Or Refractory Advanced B-Cell Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1810-1810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Mehdi Hamadani ◽  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Celeste M. Bello ◽  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
B Cell Malignancies

Abstract Background MEDI-551 is an affinity-optimized and afucosylated humanized IgG kappa monoclonal antibody directed against CD19 and induces malignant clone destruction by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. This study evaluates the safety profile and clinical activity of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. These include chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and multiple myeloma (MM). Objectives Determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MEDI-551 in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Secondary objectives include clinical activity of MEDI-551. Methods In this phase 1/2 open-label multicenter, global dose-escalation and expansion study, patients with relapsed or refractory CLL, DLBCL, FL, or MM received MEDI-551 (at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, or 12 mg/kg) by intravenous infusion administered over 28-day cycles using standard 3+3 dose escalation. Dose escalation continued to the maximum dose ≤12 mg/kg or until MTD was reached. Therapy continued for 2 cycles beyond complete response (CR), or until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as a MEDI-551-related adverse event (AE) that prevented completion of a full first cycle of MEDI-551, or as a ≥grade 3 toxicity (excluding hematologic toxicity) that could not be ascribed to another cause. Results Of 91 patients who received ≥1 dose of MEDI-551, 25 patients (CLL [3], DLBCL [6], FL [12], MM [4]) were enrolled in the phase 1 escalation portion (Jun 2010–Aug 2011). No MTD was achieved. The phase 2 expansion phase included 66 patients (CLL [23], DLBCL [20], FL [22], MM [1]) as of 14Jul2013. Three patients were re-treated with MEDI-551 upon relapse. Median age of patients treated was 66 years; median lines of prior therapy was 6. The median number of treatment cycles was 5 with a maximum of 28 cycles. There were 14 deaths due to AEs (none were drug-related) and 15 subjects discontinued treatment. One subject each discontinued due to drug-related neutropenia and infusion reaction. Most AEs were grade 1/2 with dose-independent frequency and severity (Table). Of 91 patients, 5 (5.5%) patients had grade 4 TEAEs (2 with drug-related neutropenia) and 9 (9.9%) had grade 5 events, none were drug related. Of 19 patients with 38 serious AEs (SAE), 2 patients had 3 events that were considered drug-related; pneumonia and sepsis in 1 patient and infusion related reaction in the other. Of 83 patients in the efficacy evaluable population (includes all patients who received any treatment of MEDI-551 and completed at least 1 post-baseline disease assessment), 9 had CR, 12 had partial responses (PR) and 42 had stable disease (SD; Figure 1). ORR to single-agent MEDI-551 was 24%, 24%, or 31% respectively in heavily pre-treated patients with CLL, DLBCL, or FL. Median progression-free survival was ≈9 months (Figure 2). Conclusions MEDI-551 has an acceptable safety profile warranting further study. Anti-tumor activity was achieved in a heavily pre-treated population of DLBCL, CLL, and FL patients respectively in this single-agent study. Phase 2 studies of MEDI-551 in combination with chemotherapy in DLBCL and CLL are ongoing. Funding Source This study was sponsored by MedImmune. Disclosures: Forero-Torres: MedImmune: Research Funding. Hamadani:MedImmune: Research Funding. Fanale:MedImmune: Research Funding. Bello:MedImmune: Research Funding. Kipps:MedImmune: Research Funding. Offner:MedImmune: Research Funding. Verhoef:MedImmune: Research Funding. Federico:MedImmune: Research Funding. Gregory:MedImmune: Research Funding. Sonet:MedImmune: Research Funding. Assouline:MedImmune: Research Funding. Pérez de Oteyza:MedImmune: Research Funding. Tomas:MedImmune: Research Funding. Cuneo:MedImmune: Research Funding. Elgeioushi:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Goswami:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Ibrahim:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Herbst:MedImmune: Employment, Stock/stock options from AstraZeneca Other. Cheson:MedImmune: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document