scholarly journals CLAG±M (cladribine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony stimulating factor ± mitoxantrone) Results in High Response Rates in Older Patients with Secondary and Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia - a Single Institute Experience

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1341-1341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Reddy Muppidi ◽  
Craig W. Freyer ◽  
Laurie Ann Ford ◽  
Evelena P Ontiveros ◽  
James E. Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Neutropenic Fever ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: Relapsed/refractory (r/r) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are associated with poor outcomes and low survival rates, particularly in older individuals. Because there is no standard salvage regimen, the choice of therapy for patients (pts) is often based on institutional experience. The Polish Adult Leukemia group reported high anti-leukemic activity and acceptable toxicity with CLAG±M in r/r AML pts (Wierzbowska et al, Eur J Haematol 2008); however these patients were primarily younger individuals with a median age of 45 years. Jaglal et al (Leuk Res 2014) reported their single institute experience showing that CLAG-M was superior to historical 7+3 for induction of secondary AML pts after prior azanucleoside therapy. Based on these data, we have been utilizing CLAG±M as a standard induction/re-induction strategy for r/r and secondary AML pts at our institute since 2013. Methods: Here we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 45 consecutive adult pts with secondary or r/r AML who received CLAG±M chemotherapy at Roswell Park Cancer Institute from 2013 to the present. Disease characteristics, clinical response, toxicities, and overall survival were recorded for all patients. Results: Median age was 66 (range 21-77) years. Twenty-six (58%) were male. Twenty-eight (62%) had received prior hypomethylating agents (HMA). Pts had a median of 1 prior AML therapies (range 0-5). Eight pts (18%) had no previous therapy for AML and of these all had secondary AML. The remainder (72%) had r/r AML. Median ECOG performance status was 1 (0-4). Initial WBC count was 1.86 (0.3-190) K/mcL with a mean of 9.53K/mcL. Median marrow blasts were 35% (0-95%). Two pts had extramedullary AML only. Out of 42 evaluable pts, 12 (29%) had a complete remission (CR), 16 (38%) had a complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and 3 (7%) had a 50% reduction in marrow blast count (partial remission, PR). The CR/CRi rate was 67% with an overall response rate (CR/CRi/PR) of 74%. Median overall survival (OS) was 107 (17-548) days (Figure 1). Fourteen pts (31%) proceeded to allogeneic transplant (BMT). Treatment was overall well tolerated with no unexpected dose-limiting toxicities. The most common toxicity was neutropenic fever, which occurred in 36 pts (80%). Of note, 35 pts received CLAG+M while 10 pts (23%) received CLAG without mitoxantrone due to prior anthracycline exposure or cardiomyopathy. However ORR (78% vs 60%) and median OS (101 vs. 175 days, p=0.18) in CLAG+M vs. CLAG treated pts were not significantly different. There was no difference in response rates or median OS in patients who had/ had not received prior HMA or who had received several prior lines of therapy (0-2 vs. >2). Two-thirds (30 of 45) of pts were ³ 60 years with a median ECOG of 1 (range 0-3). Despite higher percentages of secondary/therapy-related AML and prior HMA use in older pts, outcomes of CLAG+M were similar in both age groups (Table 1). ORR was 72% vs. 77% (p=NS) and median OS was 101 vs. 145 days (p=0.06) in older versus younger pts, respectively. Equal numbers of older and younger pts (33%) underwent subsequent BMT. In older pts receiving CLAG±M, there were no documented cases of neurotoxicity and no increased neutropenic complications. Conclusions: CLAG±M resulted in high clinical responses and prolonged overall survival in pts with secondary and r/r AML with poor risk features, specifically older age (³60 years old) and multiple prior lines of therapy including previous HMA. Unlike other higher dose cytarabine-containing regimens, CLAG±M was well tolerated without significant neurotoxicity. Although larger prospective clinical trials are required to support these findings, overall our results support the use of CLAG±M as a valuable addition to the current armamentarium of salvage regimens for older fit AML patients. Table 1. Outcomes of older ( ³ 60 yrs) vs. younger AML pts treated with CLAG±M Age ³ 60 yrs Age <60 yrs No. of patients N=30 N=15 Median age (yrs) 72 (60-77) 48 (21-59) Prior HM Agents (%) 22/30 (73%) 6/15 (40%) No. of prior therapies (Median) 1 (0-5) 2 (0-5) Secondary/ tAML (%) 18/3 (70%) 2/0 (13%) Complete remission (CR/CRi, %) 8/11 (66%) 4/5 (69%) Overall response rates (ORR) 21 (72%) 10 (77%) Median OS from CLAG±M (days, range, CI) 101 (32-409, 95% CI 90-158) 145 (17-548, 95% CI 103-295) Neutropenic fever (%) 21/30 (70%) 13/15 (87%) Post treatment BMT (%) 10 (33%) 5 (33%) Figure 1. Survival of CLAG±M patients from treatment Figure 1. Survival of CLAG±M patients from treatment Disclosures Thompson: Kinex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Griffiths:Celgene: Honoraria; Astex: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Wang:Immunogen: Research Funding.

Targeted Intravenous Busulfan and Fludarabine Allogeneic Transplantation Conditioning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2290-2290
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Pidala ◽  
Jongphil Kim ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Ernesto Ayala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Large Series ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Relapsed Disease ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 2290 Poster Board II-267 Reduced and intermediate intensity conditioning with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers promise to effectively control hematologic malignancies, while limiting treatment related toxicity and mortality (TRM). We aimed to examine the efficacy of IV targeted Busulfan and Fludarabine (IV-Bu/Flu) in a large series of adults with exclusively acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). One hundred adults (median age 48) with AML (CR1 49, CR2 25, REL1 8, REL2 1, PIF 16, untreated 1) were treated with Busulfan 130-145 mg/m2/day for four days with pharmacokinetic targeting on the final two days to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 5300 (+/-10%) μmol*min/L/day and Fludarabine 40mg/m2/day for 4 days, followed by transplantation of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (N=98) or unstimulated bone marrow (BM) (N=2) from allogeneic donors (MRD 38, MUD 38, MMUD 24). Acute GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus/methotrexate (N = 77), tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (N = 22), or tacrolimus/sirolimus (N = 1). Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 16 and 12 days, respectively. Non-relapse mortality was 3% at 100 days, and 15% by 1 year. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 41%. Overall survival (OS) was 59% (95% CI: 48.1 – 67.5) at 1 year, and 42% (95% CI: 30.8-53.3) at 4 years. OS at 4 years for primary AML in CR1, secondary AML in CR1, CR2, and PIF were 52.9%, 40.1%, 41.2%, and 57.5% respectively; none with relapsed disease survived to 4 years (log-rank p = 0.0014). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 53% (95% CI: 42.8 – 62.2) at 1 year, and 32.3% (95% CI: 21.8 – 43.2) at 4 years. PFS at 4 years for primary AML in CR1, secondary AML in CR1, CR2, and PIF were 44.1%, 33.4%, 33.9%, and 33.1%, respectively, while none with relapsed disease at transplant reached this endpoint (p = 0.0264). On multivariable modeling, remission status at HCT (relapsed disease HR 14.85 (95% CI: 2.12 - 104.2), p = 0.007), moderate/severe cGVHD (HR 0.281, 95% CI: 0.10 - 0.76; p = 0.013), and day 90 bone marrow (BM) chimerism ≥ 90% (HR 0.245, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.79; p = 0.018) predicted overall survival, and day 90 BM chimerism ≥ 90% (HR of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08 - 0.45), p = 0.0002) predicted PFS. The following were not significantly related with OS or PFS: age, cytogenetics, donor relation, number of induction cycles, aGVHD prophylaxis regimen, maximum aGVHD grade, WBC at diagnosis, time in first CR, or % BM blasts prior to transplant. Day 90 BM chimerism and cGVHD were significantly related with relapse. Maximum grade of aGVHD predicted non-relapse mortality. These data support the low TRM and efficacy of IV-Bu/Flu in a large series of exclusively AML patients, and demonstrate the impact of day 90 bone marrow chimerism as an important prognostic factor. Further efforts to mitigate relapse risk after HCT are warranted, particularly in those with advanced disease at time of transplant. Disclosures: Off Label Use: IV busulfan and fludarabine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Alsina:Ortho Biotech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Field:PDL BioPharma: Research Funding. Fernandez:Otsuka: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Combination of Sorafenib and 5-Azacytidine in Older Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia with FLT3-ITDmutation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1611-1611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maro Ohanian ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Elias J. Jabbour ◽  
Naval Daver ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: The combination of 5-azacytidine (AZA) and sorafenib has been reported to be a safe and effective strategy in patients with relapsed and/or refractory FLT3-ITD mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We hypothesized that combining sorafenib with AZA, may be used effectively in older patients with untreated AML whose leukemic cells harbor the mutation. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had untreated AML with a FLT3-ITD clone detectable by polymerase chain reaction (at least 10% mutation burden), were 60 years of age or older, and had adequate performance status (ECOG ≤ 2) and organ function. The treatment regimen included AZA 75 mg/m2daily for 7 days combined with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily for 28 days. Cycles were repeated approximately every 4 to 5 weeks. Dose adjustments of both agents, and delay of AZA, based on toxicity were allowed. Results: Overall, 23 patients with untreated AML with a median age of 74 yrs (range, 61-86 yrs) were enrolled. They included 14 (61%) patients with normal cytogenetics, 2 (9%) with complex karyotype, 4 (17%) with other miscellaneous abnormalities, and 3 (13%) with insufficient metaphases. Prior to the initiation of treatment, FLT3-ITD was detected in all patients with a median allelic ratio of 0.35 (range, 0.01-0.89). The overall response rate in 22 evaluable patients was (77%) including 7 (32%) with CR, 9 (41%) CRi/CRp, and 1 (5%) PR. Patients have received a median of 3 (range, 1-35) treatment cycles with the median number of cycles to response being 2 (range, 1-5) and the median time to achieve response, 1.9 months (range, 0.7-4.3 months). The median duration of CR/CRp/CRi is 14.5 months (range, 1.2-28.7 months). Two (9%) patients have proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant. With a median follow-up of 4.2 months (range, 0.9-61.4), 8 patients remain alive, 7 still in remission (CR/CRP/CRi). The median overall survival for the entire group is 8.8 months, and 9.2 months in the 17 responding patients (Figure 1). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events included: grade 3 diarrhea (n=2), grade 3 pneumonitis (n=3), grade 4 sepsis (n=2), grade 3 infections (n=3). When patients treated with AZA + sorafenib (n=23) were compared to a matched cohort of historical patients older than 60 years who were treated with hypomethylator-based therapy without sorafenib (n=20), overall response rates (including CR, CRp, CRi, and PR) were statistically similar (77% vs.31%, respectively; p=0.6). The median overall survival for the two groups were 8.8 months and 9.4 months (p=0.67), respectively. The remission duration for the responding patients treated with AZA+sorafenib was significantly longer (16 months) than those on other hypomethylator-based regimens without sorafenib (3.8 months)(p=0.008) (Figure 2). Conclusions: The combination of AZA and Sorafenib is effective and well tolerated in older patients with untreated FLT3-ITD mutated AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Jabbour: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Daver:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Burger:Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Myelodysplastic Syndrome with Excess Blasts and Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Same Disease with Different Blast Count

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2692-2692
Author(s):  
Xueyan Chen ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Brent L Wood ◽  
Roland B. Walter ◽  
Pamela S. Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
World Health ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Data Safety ◽  
Monitoring Committee ◽  
Mutational Hotspots ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) diagnoses acute myeloid leukemia (AML) if ≥20% myeloid blasts are present in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Consequently a patient with even 19% blasts is often ineligible for an "AML study". A less arbitrary means to define "AML" and myelodysplastic syndromes ("MDS") emphasizes biologic features. Here, focusing on patients with WHO-defined MDS with excess (5-19%) blasts (MDS-EB) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) or therapy-related (t-AML) (WHO defined secondary AML), we compared morphologic blast percentage (MBP) with the frequency of mutations in genes belonging to different functional groups, and with the variant allele frequency (VAF) for individually mutated genes. Methods: 328 adults with WHO-defined AML (de novo and secondary; n=149) or MDS (n=179) and with mutational analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed at the University of Washington Hematopathology Laboratory between 2015-2017 were included. Of these, 86 had MDS-EB and 49 had secondary AML. Mutational analysis was performed using a customized, amplicon-based assay, TruSeq Custom Amplicon (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Custom oligonucleotide probes targeted specific mutational hotspots in ASXL1, CBL, CEBPA, CSF3R, EZH2, FBXW7, FGFR1, FLT3, GATA1, GATA2, HRAS, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KIT, KMT2A, KRAS, MAP2K1, MPL, NOTCH1, NPM1, NRAS, PDGFRA, PHF6, PTEN, RB1, RUNX1, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, STAT3, TET2, TP53, U2AF1, WT1, and ZRSR2. VAF ≥5% was required to identify point mutations. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to examine the relation between VAF of individually mutated genes and MBP. The Mann Whitney test served to compare the distribution of VAF in AML (≥20% blasts) vs. MDS (<20% blasts), before and after exclusion of subgroups as described below. Fisher's exact test was used to compare incidence of mutations. Results: 96% of cases had ≥one mutation in the 36 genes tested using NGS. Considering all 328 patients, mutations in tumor suppressor and cohesin complex genes were similarly frequent in MDS and AML, whereas spliceosomal genes, in particular SF3B1 and SRSF2, were more frequently mutated in MDS than in AML (46% vs. 26%, p<0.001). Mutations in epigenetic modifiers were more common in AML than MDS (54% vs. 42%, p= 0.035) as were transcription factor mutations (52% vs. 28%, p<0.001). However comparisons limited to MDS-EB vs. AML-MRC/t-AML, indicated the differences observed when comparing all MDS and all AML were less apparent, both statistically and more perhaps importantly with respect to observed frequencies. For example, spliceosomal gene mutations were found in 35% in MDS-EB and 27% in AML-MRC/t-AML (p=0.34) vs. 46% and 26% in all MDS and all AML. NPM1 mutations were detected in only 8% of AML-MRC/t-AML vs. 3% in MDS-EB but 29% for all AML. Results were analogous with FLT3 ITD, FLT3 TKD, and JAK2 mutations. Examining 20 individually mutated genes detected in ≥ 10 patients only with SRSF2 (p=0.04), did distribution of VAF differ statistically according to whether blast percentage was <20% versus ≥20%. Conclusions: The similar prevalence of mutations in different functional categories in MDS-EB and AML-MRC/t-AML suggests these entities are two manifestations of the same disease. We believe it appropriate to combine these WHO entities allowing patients in each to be eligible for both AML and MDS trials. Disclosures Othus: Glycomimetics: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee; Celgene: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee. Walter:Amgen: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Argenx BVBA: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; BioLineRx: Consultancy; BiVictriX: Consultancy; Covagen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; New Link Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Race Oncology: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Aptevo Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Becker:Accordant Health Services/Caremark: Consultancy; AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glycomimetics, Invivoscribe, JW Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Trovagene: Research Funding; The France Foundation: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Ixazomib with Conventional Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Philip C. Amrein ◽  
Eyal C. Attar ◽  
Geoffrey Fell ◽  
Traci M. Blonquist ◽  
Andrew M. Brunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction: Outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among older patients has remained largely unchanged for decades. Long-term survival for patients aged &gt;60 years is poor (median survival 10.5 months). Targeting the proteasome in AML is attractive, since leukemia stem cells have demonstrated sensitivity to proteasome inhibition in preclinical models, perhaps through down regulation of nuclear NF-KB (Guzman, Blood 2001). AML cell lines are susceptible to synergistic cytotoxicity when bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, is combined with daunorubicin and cytarabine. We have shown that adding bortezomib to standard treatment in AML results in a high remission rate, although grade 2 sensory neurotoxicity was noted in approximately 12% of treated patients. A newer generation proteasome inhibitor, ixazomib, is less frequently associated with neurotoxicity, and, therefore, was selected for combination with conventional chemotherapy in this phase I trial. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ixazomib in combination with conventional induction and consolidation chemotherapy for AML. Herein are the initial results of this trial. Methods: Adults &gt;60 years of age with newly diagnosed AML were screened for eligibility. Patients with secondary AML were eligible, including those with prior hypomethylating agent therapy for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We excluded those with promyelocytic leukemia. There were 2 phases in this study. In the first phase (A), the induction treatment consisted of the following: cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day by continuous IV infusion, Days 1-7; daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day IV, Days 1, 2, 3, and ixazomib was provided orally at the cohort dose, Days 2, 5, 9, and 12. Consolidaton or transplant was at the discretion of the treating physician in phase A. In the second phase (B), induction was the same as that with the determined MTD of ixazomib. All patients were to be treated with the following consolidation: cytarabine at 2 g/m2/day, days 1-5 with ixazomib on days 2, 5, 9, and 12 at the cohort dose for consolidation. A standard 3 + 3 patient cohort dose escalation design was used to determine whether the dose of ixazomib could be safely escalated in 3 cohorts (1.5 mg/day, 2.3 mg/day, 3.0 mg/day), initially in induction (phase A) and subsequently in consolidation (phase B). The determined MTD of ixazomib in the first portion (A) of the trial was used during induction in the second portion (B), which sought to determine the MTD for ixazomib during consolidation. Secondary objectives included rate of complete remission, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Results: Thirty-six patients have been enrolled on study, and 28 have completed dose levels A-1 through A-3 and B1 through B-2. Full information on cohort B-3 has not yet been obtained, hence, this report covers the experience with the initial 28 patients, cohorts A-1 through B-2. There were 12 (43%) patients among the 28 with secondary AML, either with prior hematologic malignancy or therapy-related AML. Nineteen patients (68%) were male, and the median age was 68 years (range 61-80 years). There have been no grade 5 toxicities due to study drug. Three patients died early due to leukemia, 2 of which were replaced for assessment of the MTD. Nearly all the grade 3 and 4 toxicities were hematologic (Table). There was 1 DLT (grade 4 platelet count decrease extending beyond Day 42). There has been no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity with ixazomib to date. Among the 28 patients in the first 5 cohorts, 22 achieved complete remissions (CR) and 2 achieved CRi, for a composite remission rate (CCR) of 86%. Among the 12 patients with secondary AML 8 achieved CR and 2 achieved CRi, for a CCR of 83%. The median OS for the 28 patients has not been reached (graph). The 18-month OS estimate was 65% [90% CI, 50-85%]. Conclusions: The highest dose level (3 mg) of ixazomib planned for induction in this trial has been reached safely. For consolidation there have been no serious safety issues in the first 2 cohorts with a dose up to 2.3 mg, apart from 1 DLT in the form of delayed platelet count recovery. The recommended phase 2 dose of ixazomib for induction is 3 mg. Accrual to cohort B-3 is ongoing. Notably, to date, no grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity has been encountered. The remission rate in this older adult population with the addition of ixazomib to standard chemotherapy appears favorable. Figure Disclosures Amrein: Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Attar:Aprea Therapeutics: Current Employment. Brunner:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty-Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hobbs:Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria. Neuberg:Celgene: Research Funding; Madrigak Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Fathi:Blueprint: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib is FDA approved for multiple myeloma. We are using it in this trial for acute myeloid leukemia.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment with Gilteritinib or Quizartinib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory FLT3-ITD+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 42-43
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Perl ◽  
Qiaoyang Lu ◽  
Alan Fan ◽  
Nahla Hasabou ◽  
Erhan Berrak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Travel Costs ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background: Gilteritinib is approved for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML), based on findings from the phase 3 ADMIRAL trial (Perl AE, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019). A phase 3 trial, QuANTUM-R, demonstrated the benefit of quizartinib in pts with R/R AML with FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations (Cortes JE, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). Although eligibility criteria across both studies were similar, QuANTUM-R was more stringent as to prior therapy intensity and remission duration, which potentially enriched for higher-risk pts. We sought to describe outcomes from ADMIRAL among pts who otherwise met eligibility for QuANTUM-R. Methods: In this post-hoc analysis, a subset of pts from ADMIRAL were matched with R/R FLT3-ITD+ AML pts from QuANTUM-R on the basis of baseline characteristics and prior treatment criteria. Matched pts were either refractory to initial anthracycline-based chemotherapy or had relapsed ≤6 mos after achieving composite complete remission (CRc) with an anthracycline-based regimen. Results: Overall, 218 pts with R/R FLT3-ITD+ AML in the ADMIRAL trial (gilteritinib, n=140; salvage chemotherapy [SC], n=78) were matched with the QuANTUM-R intention-to treat (ITT) population (N=367; quizartinib, n=245; SC, n=122). Proportions of pts preselected for high-intensity SC were 66% (n=143/218) in the matched ADMIRAL ITT population and 77% (n=281/367) in the QuANTUM-R ITT populations. Demographic and baseline characteristics of the matched ADMIRAL ITT population and QuANTUM-R ITT population were similar. Median durations of exposure to gilteritinib and quizartinib were 3.8 mos and 3.2 mos, respectively, and median number of treatment cycles received were five and four, respectively. Rates of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were similar in pts treated with gilteritinib (35%; n=49/140) or quizartinib (32%; n=78/245), as were the proportions of pts who resumed gilteritinib (23%; n=32/140) or quizartinib (20%; n=48/245) therapy post-HSCT. Median overall survival (OS) in pts treated with gilteritinib or quizartinib was longer than that observed with SC. After a median follow-up of 17.4 mos, median OS was 10.2 mos with gilteritinib versus 5.6 mos with SC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.573 [95% CI: 0.403, 0.814]; one-sided nominal P=0.0008). After a median follow-up of 23.5 mos, median OS with quizartinib was 6.2 mos versus 4.7 mos with SC (HR=0.76 [95% CI: 0.58-0.98]; one-sided P=0.02). After censoring for HSCT, median OS was 9.3 mos with gilteritinib versus 5.5 mos with SC (HR=0.525 [95% CI: 0.356-0.775]; nominal one-sided P=0.0005), and 5.7 mos versus 4.6 mos with quizartinib versus SC, respectively (HR=0.79 [95% CI: 0.59, 1.05]; one-sided P=0.05). In both QuANTUM-R and matched ADMIRAL populations, the survival benefits of quizartinib and gilteritinib compared with SC were maintained across multiple subgroups, including high FLT3-ITD allelic ratio subsets. Compared with SC, high CRc rates were observed in pts treated with either gilteritinib (57%; n=80/140) or quizartinib (48%; n=118/245). The complete remission (CR) rate with gilteritinib was 23% (n=32/140), whereas the CR rate with quizartinib was 4% (n=10/245) (Table). Median time to achieve CRc was 1.8 mos with gilteritinib and 1.1 mos with quizartinib, median duration of CRc was 5.5 mos with gilteritinib and 2.8 mos with quizartinib. The safety profiles of gilteritinib and quizartinib were generally similar, though aspartate or alanine aminotransferase elevations (any grade) were more frequent with gilteritinib (41-44%) than quizartinib (≤13%), whereas neutropenia (14% vs 34%, respectively), fatigue (24% vs 39%, respectively), and prolonged QT intervals (9% vs 27%, respectively) were more frequent with quizartinib. Conclusions: In pts with R/R FLT3-ITD+ AML and similar baseline characteristics, both gilteritinib and quizartinib were generally well tolerated and associated with improved survival and treatment response compared with SC. Responses to gilteritinib and quizartinib, as measured by CRc, were similar; blood count recovery varied between the two FLT3 inhibitors. Although cross-study comparisons have substantial limitations, the findings suggest that while remission is achieved faster with quizartinib, response may be more durable and survival potentially longer with gilteritinib. Disclosures Perl: Syndax: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Beat AML: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Jazz: Honoraria, Other; FORMA Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Writing/editorial support, travel costs for meetings, Research Funding; FUJIFILM Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc: Research Funding; New Link Genetics: Honoraria, Other; Arog Pharmaceuticals Inc: Other: uncompensated consulting, travel costs for meetings; Actinium Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: writing/editorial support, travel costs for meeting presentations related to study, Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel costs for meeting; Loxo Oncology Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly & Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other. Lu:Astellas: Current Employment. Fan:Astellas Pharma: Current Employment. Hasabou:Astellas Pharma: Current Employment. Berrak:Astellas: Current Employment. Tiu:Eli Lilly & Company: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Astellas Pharma Global Development: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Increased Idarubicin Dosage during Consolidation Therapy for Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Improves Leukemia-Free Survival

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 338-338
Author(s):  
Bradstock Kenneth ◽  
Emma Link ◽  
Juliana Di Iulio ◽  
Jeff Szer ◽  
Paula Marlton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Anthracylines are one of the major classes of drugs active against acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Increased doses of daunorubicin during induction therapy for AML have been shown to improve remission rates and survival. The ALLG used idarubicin in induction therapy at a dose of 9 mg/m2 x 3 days (total dose 27 mg/m2) in combination with high-dose cytarabine and etoposide (Blood 2005, 105:481), but showed that a total idarubicin dose of 36 mg/m2 was too toxic in this context (Leukemia 2001, 15:1331). In order to further improve outcomes in adult AML by anthracycline dose escalation, we conducted a phase 3 trial comparing standard to an increased idarubicin dose during consolidation therapy. Methods: Patients achieving complete remission after 1 or 2 cycles of intensive induction therapy (idarubicin 9 mg/m2 daily x3, cytarabine 3 g/m2 twice daily on days 1,3,5 and 7, and etoposide 75 mg/m2 daily x7; ICE protocol) were randomized to receive 2 cycles of consolidation therapy with cytarabine 100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days, etoposide 75 mg/m2 for 5 days, and idarubicin 9mg/m2 daily for either 2 or 3 days (standard and intensive arms respectively). No further protocol therapy was given. The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival from randomization to consolidation therapy (LFS) with overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoint. Results: A total of 422 patients with AML (excluding cases with CBF rearrangements or APL) aged 16 to 60 years were enrolled between 2003-10, with 345 (82%) achieving complete remission, and 293 being randomized to standard (n=146) or intensive (n=147) consolidation arms. The median age was 45 years in both arms (range 16- 60), and both groups were balanced for intermediate versus unfavorable karyotypes and for frequency of mutations involving FLT3-ITD and NPM1 genes. Of the randomized patients, 120 in the standard arm (82%) and 95 in the intensive arm (65%) received the second consolidation cycle (p<0.001). The median total dose of idarubicin received in the 2 consolidation courses was 36 mg/m2 (range 17-45), or 99% (47-125%) of the protocol dose in the standard arm, versus 53 mg/m2 (18-73), or 98% (33-136%) of the protocol dose in the intensive arm. The durations of grades 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly longer in the intensive arm, but there were no differences in grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicities. There were no non-relapse deaths during consolidation on the standard arm and 2 in the intensive (0% vs 1%; p =0.50). Subsequently, 41 patients in the standard arm and 37 in the intensive arm underwent elective allogeneic BMT during first remission. On intention to-treat analysis uncensored for transplant and with a median follow-up time of 5.3 years (range 0.6 - 9.9), there was improvement in LFS in the intensive arm compared with the standard arm (3 year LFS 47% (95% CI 40-56%) versus 35% (28-44%); HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.55-0.99); p=0.045) (Figure 1). The 3 year OS for the intensive arm was 61% (95% CI 54-70%) and 50% (95% CI 43-59%) for the standard arm; HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.54-1.05); p=0.092). Although adverse cytogenetics, presence of FLT3-ITD mutation, and absence of NPM1 mutation were all associated with poorer outcomes, there was no evidence of a benefit of intensive consolidation being confined to specific cytogenetic or gene mutation sub-groups. Conclusion: We conclude that in adult patients in complete remission after intensive induction chemotherapy an increased dose of idarubicin delivered during consolidation therapy results in improved LFS, without increased non-hematologic toxicity. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Szer: Ra Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Marlton:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wei:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cartwright:ROCHE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roberts:Servier: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Mills:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship. Gill:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Seymour:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Results from a randomized trial of salvage chemotherapy followed by lestaurtinib for patients with FLT3 mutant AML in first relapse

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (12) ◽  
pp. 3294-3301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Levis ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Eunice S. Wang ◽  
Maria R. Baer ◽  
Alexander Perl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Acute Myeloid

AbstractIn a randomized trial of therapy for FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) mutant acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse, 224 patients received chemotherapy alone or followed by 80 mg of the FLT3 inhibitor lestaurtinib twice daily. Endpoints included complete remission or complete remission with incomplete platelet recovery (CR/CRp), overall survival, safety, and tolerability. Correlative studies included pharmacokinetics and analysis of in vivo FLT3 inhibition. There were 29 patients with CR/CRp in the lestaurtinib arm and 23 in the control arm (26% vs 21%; P = .35), and no difference in overall survival between the 2 arms. There was evidence of toxicity in the lestaurtinib-treated patients, particularly those with plasma levels in excess of 20μM. In the lestaurtinib arm, FLT3 inhibition was highly correlated with remission rate, but target inhibition on day 15 was achieved in only 58% of patients receiving lestaurtinib. Given that such a small proportion of patients on this trial achieved sustained FLT3 inhibition in vivo, any conclusions regarding the efficacy of combining FLT3 inhibition with chemotherapy are limited. Overall, lestaurtinib treatment after chemotherapy did not increase response rates or prolong survival of patients with FLT3 mutant acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00079482.

Monosomy Karyotype in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Predicts Adverse Treatment Outcome with Low Complete Remission Rate and Worse Event-Free and Overall Survival, and Associates with High Functional Activity of Multidrug Resistance (MDR).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3112-3112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Kyung Ahn ◽  
Dong Hwan (Dennis) Kim ◽  
Silvia Park ◽  
Jun Ho Jang ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Multidrug Resistance ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Functional Activity ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Marker Chromosome ◽  
Rhodamine 123 ◽  
Structural Abnormalities ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 3112 Poster Board III-49 Background It has been revealed that monosomy karyotype (MK), defined as 1) two or more distinct autosomal chromosome monosomies or 2) one single autosomal monosomy in the presence of structural abnormalities, identifies the highly unfavorable cytogenetic risk group of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (Breems, J Clin Oncol 2008), but lacking validation data. The current study aimed to validate the unfavorable impact of MK not only on overall survival (OS) but also on complete remission (CR) rate and event free survival (EFS) in AML patients. Methods A total of 370 consecutive AML (excluding APL) patients with available cytogenetic data who received treatment between 1995 and 2008 at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea were included in this retrospective study, among whom 169 patients (45.7%) showed normal karyotype; 65 patients (17.6%), core binding factor (CBF) positive AML; and 136 patients (36.7%), non-CBF AML, respectively. Karyotypes were scored according to their structural abnormalities, monosomy, trisomy, deletion and marker chromosome. The CR rate, EFS and OS were compared according to the presence of each cytogenetic abnormality. In addition, multidrug resistance (MDR) functional assay (P-glycoprotein assay) was performed and MDR functional activity was calculated by verapamil-inhibited rhodamine-123 efflux activity minus uninhibited rhodamine-123 efflux activity, and positivity was determined as equal to or over 5% MDR activity. Results Among treated non-CBF AML group with any kind of cytogenetic abnormalities (n=136), 95 patients (69.9%) had structural cytogenetic abnormalities, 29 pts (21.3%), autosomal monosomy, 18 pts (13.2%), sex chromosome abnormalities, 59 pts (43.4%), autosomal trisomy, 41 pts (30.1%), deletion of part of a chromosome, 18 pts (13.2%), addition and 18 pts (13.2%), marker chromosome(s). MK was noted in 23 patients (16.9%), and complex karyotype (≥3 abnormalities) were found in 40 pts (29.%), -5 in 5 pts (3.7%), -7 in 12 pts (8.8%), del(5q) in 4 pts (2.9%), del(7q) in 8 pts (5.9%), inv(3) or t(3;3) in 4 pts (2.9%), t(6;9) in 5 pts (3.7%), and t(9;22) in 2 pts (1.5%). In univariate analyses, MK+ group was revealed to be associated with shorter OS and (median 10 vs 31months, p=0.044) EFS duration (median 1.3 vs 10.1 months, p=0.002), and a lower CR rate (70.8% vs 34.8%, p=0.002). In a multivariate analysis, MK was associated with lower CR rate (HR of non-CR 0.33, 95% C.I. 0.12-0.93, p=0.036). MK has been defined as a single monosomy with structural abnormalities or multiple monosomies in a previous study. However, there were no significant difference in survival and CR rate between a single monosomy with (n=9) or without(n=6) structural abnormalities (OS, 23 vs 8 months; p =0.349; EFS, 1 vs 9months; p=0.078; CR rate 33% vs 56%; p=0.608). The group with single autosomal monosomy showed a trend of better survival (n=15, median OS 23 months, EFS 1month) than multiple autosomal monosomy group (n=14, OS 6months, EFS 1month), but it was not significantly different (p = 0.322, p=0.221). The functional MDR activity was measured in 40 patients, and positive MDR activity was found to be significantly associated with the presence of MK (87.5% vs 33.3%, p=.013). In addition, the functional MDR activity was significantly higher in MK+ group (n=8, 45.9±17.8%, mean±S.E.) than in MK- group (n=32, 4.3 ±2.7%, p=0.005 by Mann-Whitney U-test). Conclusion The current study demonstrated that the AML patients harboring MK showed a poor outcome in terms of lower CR rate and worse EFS/OS in an independent cohort of Korean AML patients, and that MK karyotype was associated with high MDR functional activity of leukemic blasts. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Comparable Disease-Free and Overall Survival After “Well-Matched” Unrelated Donor and Matched Sibling Donor Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Adverse Risk Karyotype in First Complete Remission: A Report From the Acute Leukemia Working Committee of the Centre for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 526-526
Author(s):  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Martin S. Tallman ◽  
Wensheng He ◽  
Brent Logan ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct ◽  
Matched Sibling ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 526 In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1), the indications for matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants and unrelated donor (URD) haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are different. We sought to determine the prognostic impact of donor type on the outcomes of AML with adverse risk karyotype in CR1, a high-risk AML population considered as a standard indication for MSD and URD HSCT. We evaluated the outcomes of 584 patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT for AML with adverse risk karyotype in CR1 between 1995 and 2006, reported to the CIBMTR. Adverse risk karyotype was defined according to SWOG/ECOG classification. Cytogenetics abnormalities were further classified as: complex karyotype (3 or more abnormalities), 32%; and Non-complex divided as abnormal chromosome 7, 25%; chromosome 5, 9%; MLL gene rearrangements, 18%; t (6;9), 5%; and others, 10%. 226 patients underwent MSD and 358 URD. URD were classified based on high resolution typing as:” well matched” [n=254 (71%)] with no known disparity at HLA A, B, C, DRB1; and, “partially matched” [n=104 (29%)] with one locus known or likely mismatched. Previous MDS was present in 19% and 14% had therapy-induced (t-AML). Conditioning regimens were myeloablative and reduced intensity in 74% and 26%, respectively. At 3 years treatment-related mortality (TRM) incidence was 28% (95% CI 24-31); relapse 36%(32-40); disease-free survival (DFS) 36%(32-41) and overall survival (OS) 39%(35-44). Multivariate analyses are summarized in the table. “Well matched” URD and MSD yielded similar DFS and OS, while outcomes were significantly inferior for “partially matched” URD. Cytogenetically defined subsets had similar outcomes. Evaluated as a time-dependent covariate, chronic GVHD had a significantly lower risk of relapse (RR 0.68, p=0.046), while acute GVHD had no effect (RR 0.99, p=0.96). “Well matched” URD and MSD lead to similar DFS and OS in AML CR1patients with adverse risk karyotype. The pool of patients who may benefit from graft-vs-leukemia effect generated with allogeneic HSCT may be considerably expanded with “well-matched” URD HSCT. If a suitable MSD is not availabel, “well-matched” URD should be strongly considered where a MSD HSCT would otherwise be undertaken. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document