Safety and Clinical Activity of Temsirolimus in Combination with Rituximab and DHAP in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma - Results of the Part I Cohort of the STORM Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2727-2727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Witzens-Harig ◽  
Ulrich Keller ◽  
Andreas Viardot ◽  
Christian Buske ◽  
Anne Crombé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mtor Inhibitor ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Salvage Regimen

Abstract Purpose. To evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination of the mTOR inhibitor Temsirolimus and a standard salvage regimen (R-DHAP) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell B-Cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients and Methods. This is a prospective, multicenter, phase II, open-label study. Patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL with a maximum of two prior treatment lines were eligible. The STORM regimen consisted of Rituximab 375 mg/m² (day 2) and DHAP (Dexamethasone 40mg day 3-6, Cisplatine 100 mg/m² day 3, Cytarabine 2x2 g/m² day 4) with Temsirolimus added on day 1 and 8 of a 21 d cycle, with 2-4 cycles planned. In part I, dose levels for the mTOR inhibitor Temsirolimus from 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg were predefined. Results. Here we report on the preliminary results of part I of this clinical trial. 15 patients were included - 8 patients in the 25 mg cohort and 7 patients in the 50 mg cohort. Median age was 70 (range 49-76) years and median number of prior regimen was 1. Two DLTs (one venous thrombosis in the 25 mg cohort, one esophagus infection in the 50 mg cohort) were observed. The most frequent non-hematologic side effects were nausea (9 pts, 60%), epistaxis (7 pts, 47%), fatigue (6 pts, 40%), increased ALT (6 pts, 40%) and increased creatinine (6 pts, 40%). Frequent grade 3/4 events (n>2) in both cohorts (25mg|50mg) included leukopenia (11 pts, 73% - with a mean duration of 4.4 days | 6.7 days ), thrombocytopenia (11 pts, 73% - with a mean duration of 4.6 days | 11.9 days), lymphopenia (6pts, 40%), anemia (5 pts, 33%), neutropenia (3 pts, 20%), renal failure (3 pts, 20%) and infections (4 pts, 27%, bladder infection, esophagus infection, central venous access infection, soft tissue infection, mucositis). Based on the observed toxicity profile, the independent data safety committee recommended a Temsirolimus dose of 25 mg given on day 1 and 8 for the part II extension cohort of the trial. All but one evaluable patient responded (10/11 pts, 91%), with two CRs and one CRu (27%). Four patients could not be evaluated for response at the time of this report. After a median follow up of 12 (range 5-22) months, no relapse has been documented so far (1 pt lost to follow up). Conclusion. Temsirolimus can be safely added to DHAP and Rituximab with promising activity. Recruitment into part II is ongoing and updated results will be presented. Disclosures Witzens-Harig: Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Keller:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Viardot:Roche: Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy. Buske:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria. Ho:Sanofi: Research Funding. Hess:Janssen, Roche, Celgene, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer, Janssen, Roche, Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study of Nivolumab in Combination with Ipilimumab for Relapsed or Refractory Hematologic Malignancies (CheckMate 039)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 183-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Ansell ◽  
Martin E Gutierrez ◽  
Margaret A. Shipp ◽  
Douglas Gladstone ◽  
Alison Moskowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Food And Beverage

Abstract Introduction: Nivolumab (nivo) is a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1). Nivo has demonstrated clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in a phase 1b study (NCT01592370; CheckMate 039) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. In pts diagnosed with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), after a median 86 weeks of follow-up, 7/20 responders maintained a response for >1.5 years (Ansell S et al. Blood 2015;126:583), and after a median follow-up of 67 weeks, clinical activity (investigator-assessed objective response rate) was demonstrated in follicular lymphoma (FL; 40%), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 36%), mycosis fungoides (15%), and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL; 40%) (Lesokhin AM et al. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:2698). CheckMate 039 also included a cohort of pts who had received nivo in combination with ipilimumab (ipi), a fully human mAb targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade has shown superior efficacy compared with nivo or ipi alone in preclinical studies and solid tumor malignancies (Wolchok JD et al. N Engl J Med 2013;369:122; Larkin JM et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:22; Antonia SJ et al. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:883). The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined immune checkpoint blockade (nivo+ipi) in pts with the following hematologic malignancies: HL, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL; FL and DLBCL), T-cell NHL (T-NHL; cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [CTCL] and PTCL]), and multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: Nivo+ipi were given at 3 mg/kg IV and 1 mg/kg IV, respectively, every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by nivo monotherapy (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks for up to 2 years. Pts with any of the above histologies, relapsed or refractory disease after ≥2 prior lines of therapy, and adequate organ function were included in the study. Prior systemic therapy may have included chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). Prior anti-PD-1 therapy and allogeneic (allo)-HSCT were not permitted. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), best overall response, duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In total, 65 pts were treated with nivo+ipi (31 HL, 15 B-NHL, 11 T-NHL, 7 MM, and 1 with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma [PMBL] who was included in the overall safety cohort only). Median (range) number of prior systemic therapies was 4 (2, 10; HL), 3, (1, 16; B-NHL), 4 (1, 11; T-NHL), and 5 (2, 20; MM). Among patients with HL, only 13% (4/31) had prior auto-HSCT. 2 pts with HL and 1 with T-NHL proceeded to allo-HSCT after stopping study therapy. Across all cohorts, median follow-up was 11.4 months. 5 pts (8%) discontinued due to a drug-related adverse event (AE). The most common drug-related AEs of any grade were fatigue (17 pts [26%]), pyrexia (15 [23%]), and diarrhea (12 [18%]). 19 pts (29%) had a drug-related AE of grade ≥3. 31 pts (48%) had a serious AE. 24 pts (37%) died: HL 2 pts, B-NHL 11, T-NHL 6, MM 4, PMBL 1. Among those pts, 22 (34%) were from disease progression (HL 2 pts, B-NHL 10, T-NHL 5, MM 4, PMBL 1); no deaths were due to an AE. Clinical outcome data are presented (Table). Conclusions: These are the first reported data of combination checkpoint blockade therapy in hematologic malignancies. Overall, the combination of nivo+ipi in these heavily pretreated patients demonstrated a safety and efficacy profile similar to that previously reported for nivo monotherapy in HL, NHL, and MM. Additional follow-up may further clarify the role of ipi in this cohort of patients. In this predominantly transplant-naïve group of patients with HL, the efficacy of nivo+ipi was similar to that seen in patients with relapsed/refractory HL treated with nivo alone. Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). Medical writing: S Addison, Caudex, funded by BMS Disclosures Ansell: BMS, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Celldex and Affimed: Research Funding. Gutierrez:Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Traveling and Lodging- Food and Beverage; E.R. Squibb & Sons, LLC (Bristol Myers Squibb): Consultancy, Other: Travel and Lodging; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Travel and Lodging; Pharmacyclics LLC, An AbbVie Company: Other: Food and Beverage. Shipp:Cell Signaling: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Merck, Gilead, Takeda: Other: Scientific Advisory Board. Moskowitz:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Merck: Consultancy. Borello:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Popa-Mckiver:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership. Farsaci:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Zhu:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Armand:Sequenta Inc: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2898-2898
Author(s):  
Vania Phuoc ◽  
Leidy Isenalumhe ◽  
Hayder Saeed ◽  
Celeste Bello ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
End Of Treatment

Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Outcomes of Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NLPHL) Patients Treated with R-CHOP.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2812-2812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Chao-Ming Lai ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Jorge Romaguera ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Field Radiation

Abstract Abstract 2812 Introduction: Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma (NLPHL) constitutes 5% of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) diagnoses. Recently gene expression profiling has shown significant overlap between NLPHL, T-cell-rich B cell lymphoma (TCRBCL), and classical HL (Brune, V et al, J Exp Med, 2008). NLPHL patients also have an approximate 7% risk of transformation at 10 years to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and TCRBCL (Al-Mansour, M et al, JCO, 2010). Data from multiple groups (Nogova, L et al, Ann Onc, 2005, Chen, RC et al, JCO, 2010, Wirth, A et al, Cancer, 2005) support extended progression-free survivals (PFS) for stage IA/IIA patients treated with radiation alone. While chemotherapy is generally recommended for patients with stage IB/IIB or III/IV disease, there is lack of guidelines on whether classical HL-directed regimens, such as ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine), or B-cell lymphoma-directed regimens, such as R-CHOP (rituximab, cychlophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) should be used. Given the similarities between NLPHL and indolent CD20+ B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), our group started using the R-CHOP regimen for patients with NLPHL requiring systemic therapy. In order to examine the potential efficacy of this approach, we conducted a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes in patients who received R-CHOP versus other regimens treated at UT MDACC from 1995 to 2010. Results: 83 patients were referred. 6 patients were found to have NLPHL with transformation to DLBCL or TCRBCL. 3 had alternative diagnoses. 11 lacked full immunophenotyping to confirm diagnosis. 63 patients had confirmed diagnoses of NLPHL (39 stage I/II and 24 stage III/IV). 52 NLPHL patients were evaluable (10 did not complete full treatment planning or were lost to follow-up and 1 is currently completing therapy). 7 patients had extranodal disease (thyroid, breast, lung, liver, bone marrow/cortex) and 8 had spleen involvement. Overall their median age at diagnosis was 40, male:female ratio was 2.5, and median follow-up is 46 months (range 8–149 months). 6 patients had relapse of NLPHL, 2 patients had transformation at a median of 39 months (1 to DLBCL, 1 to TCRBCL), 4 patients died (1 from acute myelogenous leukemia with deletion 7, 1 from DLBCL, 2 from unrelated causes while in remission), and 2 patients underwent autologous stem cell transplant (1 for relapsed NLPHL in 3rd complete remission and 1 for transformation to TCRBCL). Therapies for stage I/II NLPHL included: surgical excision alone (2 patients with stage IA disease declined radiation treatment), subtotal nodal irradiation (STNI), mantle field radiation, involved field radiation (IFRT), rituximab (R) alone and plus IFRT, ABVD plus STNI, R-ABVD, COPP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) plus IFRT, and R-CHOP alone and plus IFRT. Therapies for stage III/IV included: mantle field radiation (1 patient who declined chemotherapy), NOVP (mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, prednisone) plus mantle field radiation, ABVD, R-ABVD, R-CHOP alone and plus IFRT. A total of 15 patients received R-CHOP alone (4 stage I/II, 11 stage III/IV) and 5 patients received R-CHOP plus IFRT (4 stage I/II, 1 stage III/IV). Response to R-CHOP as assessed by CT scan criteria was 100% overall response rate (ORR) with 90% complete remissions (CR). No R-CHOP patients have had relapses or transformation with a median follow-up of 42 months (range 8–111 months). One patient treated with R-CHOP died of unrelated causes while in remission. However, with other therapies 19% have relapsed after median remissions of 38 months (range 4 to 72 months). R-CHOP when compared to other treatments has a trend towards improved PFS (Figures 1, 2, and 3). Survival rates for NLPHL patients at 5 years with 95% confidence intervals are: R-CHOP: PFS 0.95 (0.86, 1), OS (overall survival) 0.95 (0.86, 1) and other therapies: PFS 0.71 (0.55, 0.92), OS 0.91 (0.8, 1). Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that RCHOP is an effective regimen for the treatment of patients with NLPHL. A prospective evaluation of R-CHOP as a front-line treatment of NLPHL is under consideration. Disclosures: Fanale: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Given the CD20 positivity of nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) rituximab has been evaluated previously for relapsed NLPHL and was shown to be efficacious. Rituximab however is not FDA approved for NLPHL. This is a retrospective study that evaluates the use of R-CHOP and other therapies for NLPHL. Current NCCN guidelines support consideration of R-CHOP for NLPHL treatment, and given the rarity of the disease there is no one defined preferred chemotherapy regimen. This information will be disclosed to the audience. Fayad:Genentech: Research Funding. Rodriguez:Genentech: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Younes:Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; SBIO: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding.

A Phase II Trial of Ofatumumab In Subjects with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1795-1795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Herbert Eradat ◽  
Julie C. Switzky ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Workshop ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Rapid Rise ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1795 Background: Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent B-cell lymphoma characterized by a heterogeneous population of lymphocytes, plasmacytoid lymphocytes and plasma cells with variable CD20 expression. Rituximab (R) achieves an overall response rate (ORR) of 25–50% in relapsed/refractory WM and is associated with IgM flares, manifested by a rapid rise in IgM, potentially leading to complications of hyperviscosity. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets an epitope encompassing both the large and small extracellular loops of CD20 and effectively induces complement-dependent cytotoxicity of B-lymphoma cells. OFA is approved for the treatment of fludarabine- and alemtuzumab-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has demonstrated clinical activity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Given the efficacy of OFA in CLL, with its decreased CD20 antigen density, similar to WM where CD20 is down-regulated with differentiation of cells into plasma cells, a Phase II, open-label, single-arm trial of OFA in patients (pts) with WM was initiated to examine the safety and efficacy of OFA in this population. We report data from a planned interim analysis, which was performed to examine IgM flare, toxicity and response data. Methods: Pts (age ≥18 years) with WM requiring therapy by 2nd International Workshop on WM criteria were eligible. Pts received OFA 300 mg week 1 and 1000 mg weeks 2–4. Premedication included acetaminophen and antihistamine (all infusions) and glucocorticoid (infusions 1 and 2). Pts who experienced grade 3–4 infusion-related adverse events (AEs) during weeks 1 and 2 also received glucocorticoid during weeks 3 and 4. The primary endpoint was ORR assessed by 3rd International Workshop on WM criteria, and toxicity was assessed according to NCI-CTCAE, v3.0. Results: Fifteen pts were enrolled between March 2009 and January 2010. Median age was 59 years (range 43–85), and 9 pts were male. Pts had a median IgM level of 3.70 g/dL (range 1.21–6.62) and median hemoglobin (hgb) of 9.8 g/dL (range 5.3–11.7). Three pts were previously untreated; 12 pts had received a median of 3 therapies (range 2–5), including 11 pts who had received R, and 7 pts who had received a purine analog. Fourteen pts completed all 4 infusions of OFA. One pt withdrew from study after infusion 3 due to a drug-related serious AE (SAE). One pt had cryoglobulinemia, which interfered with IgM assessment. Of the 14 pts with evaluable IgM levels, 3 achieved partial response (PR), and 3 achieved minor response (ORR=43%) 8 weeks to 5 months after start of OFA therapy. One of 3 previously untreated pts and 5 of 12 relapsed pts responded. Four of 11 pts who had received prior R and 2 of 4 R-naïve pts responded. Five of 9 pts with IgM <4 g/dL and 1 of 5 pts with IgM >4 g/dL responded. Four pts with a median hgb of 8.0 g/dL (range 5.3–9.2) experienced ≥2.8 g/dL increase in hgb, including 3 pts who had >5 g/dL increase; median time to reach hgb ≥11.0 was 4 weeks. Infusion-related events occurred with dose 1 (300 mg) in 12 pts and with dose 2 (1000 mg) in 7 pts; all infusion events were grade 1–2 except 2 grade 3 events (rash, serum sickness). Nine pts developed 11 infections: 7 URI, 2 UTI, 1 sinusitis, 1 oral candidiasis (all grade 2). One pt developed grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Two pts developed SAEs possibly related to OFA. One pt developed grade 3 Coombs-negative hemolytic anemia after infusion 3 resulting in study withdrawal, and 1 pt with a baseline IgM level of 6.62 g/dL developed grade 3 renal insufficiency due to a rapid rise in IgM and cast nephropathy 6 weeks after starting OFA. One additional pt, with a baseline IgM level of 4.69 g/dL, developed a rapid rise in IgM and hyperviscosity symptoms. Both pts with a rapid rise in IgM underwent plasmapheresis with resolution of symptoms. No other OFA-related hematologic toxicity was observed. Conclusions: OFA has an acceptable toxicity profile, although a rapid rise in IgM requiring plasmapheresis was observed in 2 pts with high baseline IgM levels. OFA shows clinical activity in pts with WM, including those who relapse after R therapy, with rapid improvement in hgb and slower reduction of IgM levels. Based on the acceptable safety profile in this study and the dose of OFA approved for refractory CLL, the study was amended to increase the OFA dose to 2000 mg and allow a 2nd cycle of therapy for pts who do not attain PR after cycle 1. Accrual to the amended study is ongoing. Disclosures: Furman: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Consultancy; Calistoga: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an investigational anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, currently under development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia and follicular lymphoma) as well as autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis). Switzky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Research Funding; Genmab: Employment, Research Funding. Leonard:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Liao:GSK: Employment. Shah:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment; Genmab: Research Funding. Brownell-Buttich:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Lisby:Genmab A/S: Employment. Lin:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Employment.

Outcome Of Patients With Double-Hit Lymphomas Treated With CODOX-M/IVAC + R Followed By Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation In British Columbia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1788-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haowei (Linda) Sun ◽  
Kerry J. Savage ◽  
Aly Karsan ◽  
Graham W. Slack ◽  
Cynthia L. Toze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Double Hit

Abstract Background Double-hit (DHIT) lymphoma is a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas characterized by concurrent translocations involving MYC and BCL2 and typified by aggressive behavior and poor prognosis with only rare long-term survivors. There is no established treatment for DHIT lymphoma. Since 2003, the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) has adopted the use of intensive chemotherapy CODOX-M/IVAC combined with rituximab (R) followed by high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT) as definitive treatment for DHIT lymphoma. In younger patients, an ablative matched sibling donor allotransplant (AlloSCT) is preferred over an autotransplant (AutoSCT). For all patients over the age of 60 years only AutoSCT is offered. Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is used as a part of the conditioning regimen for patients younger than 60 years of age. Here we report our provincial experience with this strategy, focusing on the ability to deliver this treatment and survival outcomes. Methods The Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia database and the BCCA Lymphoid Cancer Database were searched to identify all patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphomas with concurrent translocation of MYC and BCL2 (DHIT lymphoma) diagnosed between January 2003-September 2012. Results 27 cases of DHIT lymphoma were identified with the following characteristics: median age at diagnosis was 55.8 years (range 35.5-70.9 years); 19 (70%) were male; 26 (96%) patients had stage 3/4 disease; 16 (59%) had bone marrow involvement. All cases were HIV negative. Histological diagnosis based on the WHO 2008 classification were: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) n=8 (30%); B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma (BCL-U) n=17 (63%); B-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL) n=1; high-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (NOS) n=1. 13 cases (48%) were transformed from an underlying indolent B-cell lymphoma (12 follicular lymphoma, 1 low-grade B-cell lymphoma NOS). CODOX-M/IVAC + R was administered in 20 patients (74%). 7 patients received alternative chemotherapy regimen (5 R-CHOP, 1 R-CVP, 1 R-ICE) due to patient and/or physician preference. 14 patients (52%) underwent HSCT (7 AutoSCT, 7 AlloSCT), including 11 patients treated CODOX-M/IVAC + R pre-transplant, and 3 patients who received other therapy. 13 patients did not undergo HSCT: primary refractory disease n=7; patient preference n=2; deconditioning n=1; age > 65 and poor performance status n=3. The clinical status at time of transplantation was CR in 5 patients (19%), PR in 8 (30%), progressive disease in 1 (4%). The conditioning regimens included: cyclophosphamide/TBI n=6, VP-16/cyclophosphamide/TBI n=4, BEAM n=3, busulfan/cyclophosphamide n=1. At last follow-up, 15 (56%) patients have died, 14 from disease progression and 1 from complications of AlloSCT. 10 (37%) patients are alive and in remission and 2 patients are alive but have relapsed. 8 of 14 HSCT recipients (6 AutoSCT, 2 AlloSCT) remain alive and free of disease compared with 2 of 13 patients who did not receive HSCT; both disease free survivors received CODOX-M/IVAC + R. Median follow-up for living patients was 31 months (range 6.5-67.3 months). 2-year EFS and OS from the diagnosis of all DHIT lymphoma patients were 35% (95% CI 16%-54%) and 45% (95% CI 20%-65%), respectively. For patients who received CODOX-M/IVAC + R, the 2-year EFS was 37%. For patients who received CODOX-M/IVAC + R followed by SCT, the 2-year EFS was 43%. Patients with BCLU/ALL/High-grade lymphoma NOS had a 2-year EFS of 27% and patients with DLBL had a 2 –year EFS of 50%. Conclusion Patients with DHIT lymphoma treated with CODOX-M/IVAC + R followed by SCT can have durable remissions. Regardless, progression during initial therapy prior to SCT remains a significant problem. Patients with DLBCL histology may have a more favorable outcome than those with BCLU. Disclosures: Savage: Eli-Lilly: Consultancy. Toze:Roche Canada: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Sehn:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Roche Canada: Research Funding. Connors:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Roche Canada: Research Funding. Gerrie:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Roche Canada: Research Funding. Sutherland:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Villa:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Song:Roche: Research Funding.

Phase II Study Of Anti-CD19 Antibody Drug Conjugate (SAR3419) In Combination With Rituximab: Clinical Activity and Safety In Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (NCT01470456)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4395-4395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Catherine Thieblemont ◽  
Sophie de Guibert ◽  
Jehan Dupuis ◽  
Vincent Ribrag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background SAR3419 is a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to maytansin DM4, a potent cytotoxic agent. SAR3419 targets CD19, an antigen expressed in the majority of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The recommended dose for single agent SAR3419 was previously determined to be 55 mg/m2 administered IV every week for 4 weeks, then bi-weekly. In phase I, clinical activity was shown mainly in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). (Trial funded by Sanofi). Methods Patients (pts) with a CD20+ and CD19+ DLBCL relapsing or refractory (R/R) after at least 1 standard treatment including rituximab and not candidate for or who already underwent transplantation, were eligible. Refractory disease was defined as unresponsive to or progressing within 6 months of regimen completion. Fresh (or recent formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) biopsy was required before SAR3419 start. Pts received 375 mg/m2 of rituximab (R) IV and 55 mg/m² of SAR3419 on day 1, 8, 15, 22 (35-day cycle 1), followed by bi-weekly R and SAR3419 at the same doses for 2 additional 28-day cycles, provided there was no disease progression or other study discontinuation criteria met. The primary objective was the overall response rate (ORR) following Cheson 2007 criteria, with the first tumor assessment being done 42 days after the last study treatment administration. Secondary objectives were: safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation of the antitumor and biological activity of the combination with tumor biomarker status. Results Fifty-three pts were enrolled, 52 treated. Median age was 66.5 years (range 38-85), 50% were male; 23%, 33% and 40% of patients had received 1, 2 or ≥3 prior chemo/immunotherapy regimens for DLBCL, respectively. Of the enrolled patients, 3.8% had received no prior regimen for DLBCL and therefore were excluded from primary analysis for efficacy. Seventy-three percent had stage III/IV disease, 59% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and 63% had bulky disease. Sixty percent were refractory to first regimen (primary refractory), 16% were refractory to last regimen and 24% were relapsed pts. The ORR in the per-protocol population (n=45) was 31.1% (80% confidence interval (CI): 22.0% to 41.6%). Among the 14 responders, 5 had progressed at the time of analysis, with duration of response beyond 6 months for 3 of them. The ORR was 58.3% (80% CI: 36.2% to 78.1%) for patients with relapsed DLBCL (n=12), 42.9% (80% CI: 17.0% to 72.1%) for pts refractory to last regimen (n=7) and 15.4% (80% CI: 6.9% to 28.4%) for primary refractory pts (n=26). Overall survival and PFS data are not yet mature. Biomarkers and PK data will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) all grades non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asthenia (25.0%), nausea (21.2%), cough (19.2%), diarrhea (17.3%), weight decrease (17.3%), vomiting (15.4%), dyspnea (15.4%), abdominal pain (13.5%), back pain (13.5%), pyrexia (13.5%) and constipation (11.5%). Related grade 3-4 TEAEs were: 1 syncope, 1 bronchospasm, 2 neutropenia and 1 anemia. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation, no grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy or grade 3-4 ocular events were observed. Two pts experienced grade 2 keratitis, both rapidly recovered with local treatment. Hematological toxicity was moderate, with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 15.7% and 9.8% pts, respectively. No complications related to neutropenia were reported. Grade 3 transaminase increase was observed in 1 patient. Conclusions The combination of SAR3419 plus R showed moderate ORR in R/R DLBCL; however the study population was of poor prognosis (60% refractory to first line therapy). In the relapsed DLBCL patients a higher ORR was observed. SAR3419 plus R presented with a favorable safety profile. Further investigations on biomarker expression are ongoing to identify a sub-group of pts who could have better benefited from this combination. Disclosures: Coiffier: Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Phase II of SAR3419. Ribrag:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cartron:LFB: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Casasnovas:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hatteville:Sanofi: Employment. Zilocchi:Sanofi: Employment. Oprea:Sanofi: Employment. Tilly:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Poor Outcomes Among Patients Failing Dose-Adjusted EPOCH in Aggressive Lymphoma: A Collaborative, Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1518-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Vandermeer ◽  
Allison M Winter ◽  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Ryan D. Cassaday ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Among patients with aggressive B-NHL who fail RCHOP, about half respond to standard salvage regimens and may proceed to curative-intent, transplant-based therapy. However, whether pts failing more intensive regimens such as dose-adjusted, infusional EPOCH benefit from standard salvage regimens is unclear. We hypothesized that such patients comprise a higher-risk cohort, facing inferior response rates and outcomes using standard salvage regimens. We undertook a collaborative study to assess response rates and survival among pts failing EPOCH for aggressive B-NHL, to inform patient management and design of clinical trials in this setting. Methods Pharmacy records and institutional databases were queried, identifying pts receiving EPOCH over the last 10 years at the University of Washington/SCCA and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for combined analysis. Under IRB approval, patient characteristics, histology, outcome with EPOCH, time to EPOCH failure, response to salvage, and overall survival were analyzed. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, B-cell-lymphoma unclassifiable, HIV-associated B cell lymphoma, and transformed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included. Pts receiving <2 cycles EPOCH, or who had inadequate follow-up (<3 months), were excluded. Failure of EPOCH was defined as failure to respond or progression during therapy, need for initiation of salvage therapy, or death during therapy of any cause. Adverse events or treatment change due to toxicity were not included in the definition of failure. JMP 11 was used to generate kaplan-meier survival estimates. Results 124 pts with aggressive B-NHL receiving EPOCH were identified. 54 had not relapsed, and among 70 remaining da-EPOCH failures, 37 met the above inclusion criteria. Median age was 55. 27% were female, and 23 received EPOCH as first-line therapy. All but 3 received rituximab with EPOCH. Histologies were primarily DLBCL in 22/37 (60%) and BCL-U in 12/37 (32%) carrying a MYC translocation; most of these harbored additional translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (10/12). However, data regarding MYC rearrangement was not available for all pts. 2 had HIV-associated B-NHL and 3 had PMBCL. With 18 months follow up, the median time to EPOCH failure was 5 months. Only 3 EPOCH failures occurred late (>12 months). Median OS from the date of EPOCH failure was 10 months (Figure 1). Those receiving EPOCH as first-line therapy (23) had a median OS of 14 months from EPOCH failure, as opposed to 4 months for those receiving EPOCH as salvage therapy (log-rank p=.01). Salvage chemotherapy regimens after EPOCH were diverse, and generally ineffective; 6/28 (21%) regimens produced a response (Table 1). Among patients failing EPOCH within a year, platinum-containing salvage (RICE/RDHAP) was effective in only 2/13 patients (15%). 9 patients did not receive any salvage, most of whom died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice care. Conclusions A relatively low overall response rate (21%) was observed in this retrospective analysis of patients failing EPOCH. Analogous to early RCHOP failure in the CORAL study, those failing EPOCH within a year may face inferior outcomes with platinum-based salvage therapy. While combined from two institutions, our data represent a modest sample size and require confirmation. If verified, examination of mechanisms of resistance to EPOCH, and selecting EPOCH failures for clinical trials of novel targeted therapies and transplant-based approaches, may prove critical. Table 1. Salvage Therapy for REPOCH failures Regimen: response/total number treated Notes Response to any salvage: 6/28 (21%) Some patients received more than 1 chemo salvage; responses were tabulated per regimen. RICE: 4/12 2/3 alive post transplant(1 auto 1 allo; 1 declined transplant and survived; 1 died) RDHAP: 1/6 Gemcitabine-based: 0/5 HyperCVAD (Part A and/or B): 1/5 Survivor had CNS only relapse, received regimen B and transplant 9- received no systemic treatmen; most died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent/Abbott: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Hill:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Till:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Survival and Risk of Central Nervous System Recurrence in Burkitt or High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma in the DA-EPOCH-R Era

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2983-2983
Author(s):  
Dominic Decker ◽  
Pamela C Egan ◽  
Diana O Treaba ◽  
Adam J Olszewski
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Cns Involvement ◽  
Cns Prophylaxis ◽  
Cns Relapse

Abstract Background: The 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification distinguished new categories of high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL). Treatment of these lymphomas is in flux, as some were historically classified as DLBCL and treated with the RCHOP regimen, while others, akin to Burkitt lymphoma (BL), were treated using high-intensity regimens (e.g. CODOX-M/IVAC or hyper-CVAD) that include systemic high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) as central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis . Recently, the less intensive DA-EPOCH-R regimen has been increasingly applied for BL or HGBCL with concurrent MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements based on phase 2 data (Dunleavy et al., NEJM 2013). We examined progression-free survival (PFS) and risk of CNS relapse among HGBCL/BL patients treated in our institution. Methods: In this retrospective series from an academic center, we integrated cancer registry and electronic medical records for all patients treated for BL or HGBCL at Lifespan Cancer Institute in 2005-2017. We designated as "HGBCL" all cases with concurrent MYC and BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements, or those previously diagnosed as "B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL and BL" (per WHO 2008). We compared characteristics of patients treated with intensive regimens or with DA-EPOCH-R, as well as their PFS (using log-rank test) and cumulative incidence function (CIF) of CNS relapse (using Gray's test). Results: Among 64 patients with BL (n=38) and HGBCL (n=26), those with BL were somewhat younger (median age 52 versus [vs.] 61 years), more often male (84% vs. 58%), HIV-positive (29% vs. 8%), or with CNS involvement at baseline (21% vs. 4%). Among HGBCLs, 58% had a MYC rearrangement, whereas 31% had concurrent MYC and BCL2/BCL6 rearrangements. Eight patients who did not receive chemotherapy (median age, 78 years) were excluded from outcome analysis. Compared with patients with BL, those with HGBCL more often received DA-EPOCH-R (41% vs. 15%) or R-CHOP (27% vs. 12%), and less often high-intensity regimens (32% vs. 73%, P=.027). Compared with patients treated using high-intensity regimens, those treated with DA-EPOCH-R were significantly older (61 vs. 49 years, P=.023), with high/high-intermediate International Prognostic Index (IPI, 86% vs. 50%, P=.027), or diagnosis after 2010 (86% vs. 53%, P=.049). There was no difference in baseline CNS involvement (P=.68) or receipt of intrathecal prophylaxis (P=.16) between DA-EPOCH-R and high-intensity regimens. After median follow-up of 5.7 years, we observed 12 recurrences, including 5 (42%) in the CNS. Median PFS was not reached, whereas 3-year PFS was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42-68%), numerically better in BL than in HGBCL (63% vs. 45%, P=.33, Fig. A). Overall survival at 3 years was also 56% (95%CI, 41-68%). Factors associated with shorter PFS included age >60 years (log-rank P=.017), poor performance status (P<.001), high/high-intermediate IPI (P=.0003), and lack of CNS prophylaxis (P=.021). Treatment with DA-EPOCH-R rather than a high-intensity regimen was also associated with worse PFS (P=.001), but not when stratified by histology and age (P=.14). HIV status (P=.53) or CNS involvement at baseline (P=.15) were not prognostic. Survival after recurrence was dismal (median, 1 month, 95%CI, 0.2-3.4), despite 58% of patients receiving salvage therapy. The 3-year CIF of CNS recurrence was 9% (95%CI, 3-18%), and higher in patients with CNS involvement at baseline (P=.002). All CNS recurrences occurred during the first year of follow-up and were among patients receiving DA-EPOCH-R (35.7% vs. 0% for other regimens, P=.0004). Administration of HDMTX for CNS prophylaxis was associated with a numerically lower risk of CNS recurrence (3% vs. 16% without, P=.09, Fig. B). Conversely, we observed no difference in CNS relapse with or without intrathecal prophylaxis (9% vs. 8%, P=.84, Fig. C). Conclusions: The high proportion of CNS recurrences despite prophylaxis, and very poor outcomes at relapse, indicate persistent major areas of need in BL/HGBCL. Outcomes of DA-EPOCH-R were heavily influenced by selection bias (as evidenced by unfavorable characteristics of patients selected for this regimen), so evaluation of this regimen in comparison with high-intensity approaches is warranted in a larger sample. However, our data suggest that in BL/HGBCL systemic HDMTX may be essential for effective CNS prophylaxis. Disclosures Olszewski: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio at Diagnosis and Survival in De Novo Double/Triple Hit Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3885-3885
Author(s):  
Luis Porrata ◽  
Kay Ristow ◽  
Ellen D. McPhail ◽  
William Macon ◽  
Matthew J Maurer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocyte To Monocyte Ratio ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio at diagnosis (LMR-D) has been reported to be a prognostic factor for clinical outcomes in both T-cell and B-cell lymphomas. However, there are no reports testing the prognostic ability of LMR-D in patients diagnosed with de novo double/triple hit diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Thus, we set out to investigate if the LMR-D is a prognostic factor for survival in de novo double/triple hit lymphomas. From 10/5/1998 until 1/16/2015, thirty-four patients with de novo double/triple hit DLBCL were identified for this study. Double and triple hit were defined by interphase FISH evaluating three fusion signals to identify the BCL2 translocation and IGK/MYC D-FISH probe to identify whether the partner is IG or non-IG. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on paraffin sections using probes that included 8q24 (5'MYC, 3'MYC); t (2;8), IGK/MYC; t(8,14), MYC/IGH; t(8;22), MYC/IGL; 3q27 (3'BCL6, 5'BCL'6); and 18q21 (3'BCL2, 5'BCL2). The cohort included 14 females and 20 males. The median follow-up for the cohort was 9.0 months (range: 0.4-72.6 months). Using the median for the LMR-D as the cut-off value, patients with a LMR-D ≥ 1.2 experienced superior overall survival (OS) [Hazard ratio (HR) of 0.127, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.019-0.530, p < 0.004] and progression-free survival (PFS) [HR of 0.107, 95 CI of 0.024-0.335, p < 0.0001]. The median follow up for OS for patients with a LMR-D ≥ 1.2 was not reached with a 5-year OS rate of 82% (95% CI of 49%-95%) compared with a median follow-up of 10 months for patients with a LMR-D < 1.2 with a 0% 5 year OS rate, p < 0.003 (Figure 1A). The median PFS for patients with a LMR-D ≥ 2 was not reached with a 5 years PFS of 74% (95%CI, of 43%-91%) compared with a median follow-up of 4.7 months for patients with a LMR-D < 1.2 and 0% 5 year PFS rate, p < 0.0001 (Figure 1B). After adjusting for the International Prognostic Index, multivariate analysis showed that the LMR-D remained an independent prognostic factor for OS [HR = 0.180, 95% CI of 0.254-0.784, p < 0.02] and for PFS [HR of 0.127, 95%CI of 0.029-0.409, p < 0.0003]. In spite of the small cohort of de novo double/triple hit DLBCL, the LMR-D was identified as a prognostic factor for clinical outcomes for this specific set of aggressive lymphomas. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings. Table.LMR-D ≥ 1.2, N = 18Events = 2LMR-D < 1.2, N = 16Events = 8P < 0.003LMR-D ≥ 1.2, N = 18Events = 3LMR-D < 1.2, N = 16Events = 14P < 0.0001Figure 1AB Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Maurer: Kite Pharma: Research Funding. Ansell:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding. Off Label Use: New agent in a combination regimen..

scholarly journals Lymphoma during Pregnancy: A Multicentre Study By the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 882-882
Author(s):  
Pietro R Di Ciaccio ◽  
Belinda Campbell ◽  
Kylie D Mason ◽  
Mohamed Shanavas ◽  
Matthew Greenwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
In Pregnancy

Abstract Introduction Lymphoma complicates approximately 1/6000 pregnancies (Pereg, Haematologica 2007), and presents challenges for the patient, her family, and medical professionals. This rare event raises unique therapeutic, social and ethical issues, with the welfare of both mother and unborn child to consider. There are challenges regarding symptom obfuscation, diagnosis delays and treatment delivery. In this retrospective study, we aimed to describe the experience, treatment patterns and outcomes of lymphoma in pregnancy in Australia and New Zealand. Methods We identified patients aged ≥18 diagnosed with lymphoma in pregnancy between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2020 , across 11 institutions in Australia and New Zealand. We defined "lymphoma in pregnancy" as diagnoses occurring during pregnancy (antenatal cases) or the first 12 months after delivery (postpartum cases). Postpartum cases were included to account for the phenomenon of diagnostic delay during gestation due to deferral of diagnostic investigations and symptom obfuscation (de Haan, Lancet Oncol 2018). Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods from the date of diagnosis to death, with patients alive and lost to follow-up censored on the last day of follow-up. Results We identified 63 patients, 34 diagnosed antepartum and 29 diagnosed postpartum (Table 1). The most common diagnoses were classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (35), followed by diffuse large B cell lymphoma (11) and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (6). The median age was 32 (range 23-42) years. Women diagnosed antepartum were more likely to be nulliparous (p=0.004). Of the postpartum cases, symptoms of malignancy first appeared during pregnancy in 24%. At diagnosis, 44% had advanced stage disease. 60% of women had PET as part of baseline staging, however only 8% underwent PET whilst pregnant, all during the second or third trimester. 83% of HL patients had adverse risk factors (mediastinal bulk &gt;1/3 diameter, ESR&gt;50mm/hr, &gt;2 sites). ESR alone, which may be elevated physiologically in pregnancy, was the sole adverse risk factor for 9% of HL patients. Median days between diagnosis and treatment initiation were 14 (IQR 8-30) for antenatal patients and 21 (IQR 7-40) for postnatal. 19% of the antenatal cohort with aggressive lymphoma had treatment deferred/delayed explicitly due to pregnancy. The majority (89%) of antenatal patients were treated with ABVD (HL) or (R)CHOP/(R)EPOCH (NHL) whilst pregnant. 3 patients received first-line treatment divergent from standard (vinblastine for HL, interferon for indolent B-NHL and surgery for primary cutaneous ALCL). 37% received radiotherapy, although only 1 patient received it antenatally. Median follow up was 34 months. 5 year OS for HL was 83% (95%CI 54%-95%) and for DLBCL 74% (95%CI 30%-93%)(Figure 1). Seven patients died (4 from lymphoma, 2 treatment-related infection, 1 unknown). Discussion of elective termination of pregnancy was documented in 24 of 34 antenatal diagnoses, advised in 3 and performed in 2, both in the first trimester. Only 31 (49%) of 63 women had documented evidence of counselling regarding future fertility strategies. Of the 48 patients with available data, there were 45 live births, 2 elective terminations and 1 spontaneous abortion in the first trimester. The mean gestation at birth was significantly earlier and marginally preterm for antenatal diagnoses (mean 35.6wk v 38.2wk, p=0.002). 6 neonates (11%) were small for gestational age, 5 of whom were born to mothers diagnosed antenatally. 29% of neonates were admitted to neonatal intensive care or special care units. There were no cases of neonatal neutropenia, one case of sepsis of prematurity and one case of PJP infection in a term baby. Conclusion Lymphoma in pregnancy is rare and lacks a harmonised approach. We present a large multicentre cohort reflecting contemporary practice. Although standard therapy could be provided to most patients, delays in treatment and diagnosis were common, and most antenatally-diagnosed women did not receive optimal staging. Neonates in the antenatally-diagnosed group were more likely to be premature, however there are likely a number of confounders and causality cannot be presumed. There were no neonatal deaths. It is imperative to continue to report on data regarding lymphoma in pregnancy to inform optimal care in this setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Greenwood: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gregory: Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, Speakers Bureau. Hamad: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document