Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma Relapsing after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4361-4361
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Tsirigotis ◽  
Ronit Yerushalmi ◽  
Kostantinos Gkirkas ◽  
Noga Shentov ◽  
Ivetta Danylesko ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) has recently received approval for treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) relapse after auto-SCT. Although BV is very effective in treating relapse of HL post auto-SCT, response is usually transient. In contrast, there is a paucity of data regarding the efficacy and safety of BV, combined or not with donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), for the treatment of relapse occurring after allo-SCT. Methods Search for patients (pts) with relapsed HL post allo-SCT was performed in our transplant data set with the aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BV in combination with DLI for the treatment of relapsing HL post allo-SCT. Eight pts with relapsed HL after allo-SCT that were treated with BV were included in this report. Results Patients and treatment: There were 6 males and 2 females, with a median age of 31 years (range, 23 - 40), who had previously failed an auto-SCT. Five pts had previously received BV after auto-SCT and all but one responded to treatment. All pts had chemosensitive disease before allo-SCT and were transplanted in a state of partial remission (PR). The graft source was unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cells from a matched related or an unrelated donor in 5 and 2 pts, respectively, while 1 pt received a double umbilical cord blood graft (DUCB). Five pts achieved complete remission (CR) and one PR after allo-SCT, while 2 pts had progressive disease (PD). Disease progression occurred in a median of 11 months (range, 4 - 17) after allo-SCT. All pts received BV at a dose of 1.8mg/kg every 3 weeks for a maximum of 16 doses, till disease progression or toxicity. In two pts chemotherapy was administered before BV. A median of 4.5 (range, 3 -12) BV cycles was administered. DLI was co-administered in 5 out of 7 pts (excluding one patient who received DUCB). Decision for DLI was at the discretion of the treating physician. One pt received 4 DLIs at escalating doses (5x106, 107, 5x107, 108/kg), while another one received 2 escalating DLIs (107, 108/kg) at 3 months interval. Three pts received a single DLI (107/kg). Treatment outcome: Three and two pts achieved CR and PR respectively after treatment with BV in combination with DLI. None of the pts treated only with BV responded. Four out of 5 pts developed GVHD (3 chronic, 1 acute) post DLI administration, that resolved in all cases after a short course of low dose steroids. Disease progression was observed in 3 out of 5 responders in 4, 7 and 9 months, while 2 pts remain progression free with a median follow up of 14,5 (range, 4 - 22) months. Six out of 8 pts are alive, while 2 pts died from HL. BV/DLI treatment was well tolerated and no serious adverse effects were observed in any of the patients. Conclusions In our study, we observed that administration of BV with DLI for HL relapsing post allo-SCT in pts with prior failure to auto-SCT was effective while toxicity was minimal. Notably, re-administration of BV to pts previously treated for post auto-SCT relapse did not result in additional toxicity or resistance. Furthermore, BV combined with DLI, but not BV alone, yielded anti-tumor response in 5/7 of these very high risk pts suggesting a possible synergistic effect. Of notice is the observation that one pt who was refractory to BV post auto-SCT, had a PR after re-administration of BV post allo-SCT. Our observations are in accordance with the results of a previous report, showing that BV plus DLI after allo-SCT creates a vaccination like-effect against HL [1]. Finally, in our study we observed lower than expected frequency of GVHD post DLI that was of transient duration and easily manageable with low dose steroids. We assume that this may be due to an immune-modulating effect produced by BV. Indeed previous studies have shown that CD30 is expressed on the surface of activated T-cells present in inflammatory infiltrates of GVHD lesions [2]. Administration of BV plus DLI should be tested in larger group of patients at high risk of relapse after allo-SCT. References Theurich S, Malcher J, Wennhold K, et al. Brentuximab Vedotin Combined With Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Early Relapse of Hodgkin Lymphoma After Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation Induces Tumor-Specific Immunity and Sustained Clinical Remission. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 59-63. Chen Y, McDonough S, Hasserjian R, et al. Expression of CD30 in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2012; 120: 691-696. Disclosures Tsirigotis: CELLTRION, Inc.: Research Funding.

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2699
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Tsirigotis ◽  
Konstantinos Gkirkas ◽  
Vassiliki Kitsiou ◽  
Spiros Chondropoulos ◽  
Theofilos Athanassiades ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with high-risk acute leukemia have a high risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In an effort to reduce the relapse rate, various therapeutic methods have been implemented into clinical practice. Among them, prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pro-DLI) has shown significant efficacy. However, the widespread application of pro-DLI has been restricted mostly due to concerns regarding the development of graft versus host disease (GVHD). In the present study, we tested the safety and efficacy of a novel method of prophylactic-DLI based by repetitive administration of low lymphocyte doses. Methods: DLI was administered to patients with high-risk acute leukemia at a dose of 2 × 106/kg CD3-positive cells. DLI at the same dose was repeated every two months for at least 36 months post-allo-SCT, or until relapse or any clinical or laboratory feature suggested GVHD, whichever occurred first. Forty-four patients with a median age of 53 years (range 20–67) who underwent allo-SCT between 2011 and 2020 were included in our study. Thirty-three patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 11 with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after allo-SCT from a matched sibling (MSD, no = 38 pts) or a matched-unrelated donor (MUD, no = 6 pts) received pro-DLI. Twenty-three patients were in CR1, all with unfavorable genetic features; 12 patients were in CR2 or beyond; and 9 patients had refractory disease at the time of transplant. Ten out of 23 patients in CR1 had detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) at the time of allo-SCT. Disease risk index (DRI) was high and intermediate in 21 and 23 patients, respectively. Conditioning was myeloablative (MAC) in 36 and reduced intensity (RIC) in 8 patients, while GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine-A in combination with low-dose alemtuzumab in 39 patients or with low-dose MTX in 5 patients, respectively. Results: Thirty-five patients completed the scheduled treatment and received a median of 8 DLI doses (range 1–35). Fifteen out of 35 patients received all planned doses, while DLI was discontinued in 20 patients. Reasons for discontinuation included GVHD development in nine, donor unavailability in seven, disease relapse in three, and secondary malignancy in one patient, respectively. Nine patients were still on treatment with DLI, and they received a median of four (range 2–12) doses. Fourteen percent of patients developed transient grade-II acute GVHD while 12% developed chronic GVHD post-DLI administration. Acute GVHD was managed successfully with short course steroids, and four out of five patients with cGVHD were disease-free and off immunosuppression. With a median follow-up of 44 months (range 8–120), relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74%, (95% CI, 54–87%) and 78%, (95% CI, 58–89%) respectively, while the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 13% (95% CI, 4–28%). The cumulative incidence of relapse in patients with intermediate and high DRI is 7% and 15%, respectively. Conclusion: Prolonged—up to three years—low-dose pro-DLI administered every two months is safe and effective in reducing relapse rate in patients with high-risk acute leukemia. The low-dose repetitive administration DLI strategy reduced the risk of DLI-mediated GVHD, while the prolonged repeated administration helped in preventing relapse, possibly by inducing a sustained and prolonged immunological pressure on residual leukemic cells. This novel strategy deserves testing in larger cohort of patients with high-risk acute leukemia.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1646-1646
Author(s):  
Nicolaus Kroeger ◽  
Avichai Shimoni ◽  
Maria Zagrivnaja ◽  
Francis Ayuk ◽  
Michael Lioznov ◽  
...  

Abstract To improve anti-myeloma effect of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma, we investigated in a phase I/II study the effect of low dose thalidomide (100 mg) followed by DLI in 18 patients with progressive disease or residual disease and prior ineffective DLI after allografting. The median age was 53 years (range 31–64). Twelve patients received prior DLI and either relapsed again (n=1), or showed no response (PD: n=3; SD: n=8). The overall response rate was 67% including 22% complete remission. Major toxicity of thalidomide was weakness grade I/II (68%) and peripheral neuropathy grade I/II (28%). Only 2 patients experienced mild grade I acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) of the skin, while no grade II-IV aGvHD was seen. De novo limited chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was seen in two patients (11%). The median time to response was 108 days (range, 36–266 days). In 5 patients not responding to 100 mg, the dose of thalidomide was increased (200 mg n=4; 300 mg n=1) and subsequently two of them responded with partial remission. In three patients dose escalation of DLI was performed, resulting in one minor and one partial remission. No difference regarding response was observed between unrelated and related donors (66% each). Five out of 6 patients with deletion 13 responded, while 5 out of 9 patients without deletion 13 responded to thalidomide plus DLI. In patients who failed to respond to prior DLI, the disease status could be converted in 6 patients with SD after first DLI into CR (n=2), PR (n=3), MR (n=1) while two with SD remainded SD after thalidomide plus DLI. In three patients with progressive disease after DLI the combination of thalidomide and DLI resulted in one CR, one PR and one minor remission. The two-years estimated overall and progression-free survival was 100 % and 84%, respectively. Adoptive immunotherapy with low dose Thalidomide and DLI induces strong anti-myeloma effect with low incidence of graft versus host disease.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 3361-3363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolaus Kröger ◽  
Avichai Shimoni ◽  
Maria Zagrivnaja ◽  
Francis Ayuk ◽  
Michael Lioznov ◽  
...  

Abstract To improve the antimyeloma effect of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma, we investigated in a phase 1/2 study the effect of low-dose thalidomide (100 mg) followed by DLI in 18 patients with progressive disease or residual disease and prior ineffective DLI after allografting. The overall response rate was 67%, including 22% complete remission. Major toxicity of thalidomide was weakness grade I/II (68%) and peripheral neuropathy grade I/II (28%). Only 2 patients experienced mild grade I acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) of the skin, while no grades II to IV aGvHD was seen. De novo limited chronic GvHD (cGvHD) was seen in 2 patients (11%). The 2-year estimated overall and progression-free survival were 100% and 84%, respectively. Adoptive immunotherapy with low-dose thalidomide and DLI induces a strong antimyeloma effect with low incidence of graft versus host disease. (Blood. 2004;104:3361-3363)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document