scholarly journals Final Results from a Phase 2 Study of Pracinostat in Combination with Azacitidine in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 453-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Ehab Atallah ◽  
Samer K Khaled ◽  
Martha Arellano ◽  
Mrinal M Patnaik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Motor Neuropathy ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Study Therapy

Abstract Background: Combination studies with histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors plus hypomethylating agents (HMA) have suggested beneficial clinical activity in higher risk MDS and AML, though exceptions have also been reported. Pracinostat is a potent oral HDAC inhibitor selective for class I, II and IV isoforms. A pilot phase Ib study of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine (AZA) in higher risk MDS demonstrated a complete response (CR)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) rate of 89% (Proc ASH:3821, 2012). Preliminary data on 33 patients from a multi-center, open-label, single-arm Phase II study of Pracinostat in combination with AZA in elderly AML also reported a high CR/CRi rate (ASH 2014). Herein we report the latest survival and response results for this study. Methods: Eligibility includes previously untreated AML (≥20% bone marrow blasts), age ≥65 years, unsuitable for intensive therapy due to co-morbidities and/or AML related features, and intermediate or high-risk cytogenetics. Study therapy includes pracinostat, 60 mg p.o. 3 alternate days/week for 3 weeks plus AZA, 75 mg/m2) days 1-7 or days 1-5 and 8-9 either s.c. or i.v. with cycles repeated every 28 days until progressive disease, lack of response or intolerance. The primary endpoint is CR+CRi+ morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS) per IWG criteria. Response assessments occur at the end of cycle 1 or 2 then every other cycle or when clinically indicated. A Simon 2-stage statistical design is utilized with the following assumptions: null=0.10, alternate=0.25, a=0.10, power=0.90. Stage 1 n=27 and total stage 2 n=40. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR; CR+CRi+MLFS+partial response [PR]+PRi), duration of response and overall survival. Results: Between Dec 2013 and Dec 2014, 50 patients from 15 study sites were enrolled. At this time, 50 are evaluable for efficacy. Baseline disease characteristics for all patients include: median age 75 (range 66-84); 32 de novo AML, 13 evolved from AHD, 5 were treatment-related; 28 intermediate-risk and 20 high-risk cytogenetics and 2 unknown; baseline bone marrow blast counts ranged from 20% to 89% with a median of 40%. Thirty-one patients (62%) continue to be followed for survival (range: 8.5 to 18.5 months). Median overall survival has not been reached in the overall study population and neither in patients with high-risk cytogenics or those with AML secondary to MDS or prior anti-cancer therapy. The 1-year overall survival estimate is 60%. The primary endpoint of CR +CRi +MLFS has been observed in 27/50 evaluable patients (54%) to date, including 21/50 (42%) CR. The 60-day all-cause mortality rate is 10% (5/50). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) Grade ≥3 seen in >5% of patients: febrile neutropenia 30%; thrombocytopenia 22%; neutropenia 10%; cellulitis 10%; anemia 8%; fatigue 8%; sepsis 6%, and pancytopenia 6%. TEAE's leading to study therapy discontinuation: peripheral motor neuropathy (1), parainfluenza (1), atrial fibrillation/prolonged QTc (1), subdural hematoma after a fall (1), and sepsis (3). Conclusions: Pracinostat plus AZA produces a high rate of durable responses in this AML population. Median overall survival has not been reached; 1-year overall survival is estimated at 60%. Final response data and overall survival estimates will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Off Label Use: Azacitidine is not approved for use in acute myelogenous leukemia.. Khaled:Sequenom: Research Funding. Arellano:Cephalon Oncology: Research Funding. Butler:MEI Pharma, Inc.: Employment. Ashby:MEI Pharma, Inc.: Employment. Medeiros:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Genomic Profiling in Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (HR-MDS) Following HMA Failure: Baseline Results from the Inspire Study (04-30)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3015-3015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Anna Jonasova ◽  
Selina M. Luger ◽  
Aref Al-Kali ◽  
David Valcárcel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Genomic Profiling ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ras Pathway ◽  
Ras Mutations

Background: More than 45 mutations have been identified in association with HR-MDS. In the majority of patients with MDS (80%) co-mutations are present and the prognostic contribution of each individual mutation remains elusive, especially after adjusting for clinical variables such as IPSS-R score. N-RAS and K-RAS mutations as well as regulators of the Ras pathway (e.g. PTPN11, NF1) are frequently observed (15-20%) in HR-MDS, however their clinical impact is unclear, especially in de novo MDS. Rigosertib (RGS) is a non-ATP-competitive small molecule RAS mimetic that has the potential to block RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathways (Athuluri-Divakar 2016). Rigosertib has the potential to also inhibit wildtype upregulation of RAS. We report here genomic profiling at the time of study entry in the ongoing phase 3 randomized global study (known as INSPIRE) in patients with HR-MDS after failure of HMA therapy. Methods: INSPIRE (NCT02562443) is a global randomized Ph3 trial in pts with HR-MDS after HMA failure with an overall target enrollment of 360 pts with currently 298 pts randomized. Pts are randomized 2:1 to rigosertib or physician's choice of treatment. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). All pts failed to respond or progressed on HMA therapy. Key inclusion criteria includes: age < 82 years, RAEB-1, RAEB-2 or RAEB-t; intermediate risk (IR), high risk (HR) and very high risk (VHR) per IPSS-R; ≥ 1 cytopenia; duration of prior HMA ≤ 9 cycles within 12 months; last dose of HMA ≤ 6 months before enrollment; baseline blast counts between 5-29% and one of the following: progression any time after initiation of HMA treatment, intolerance to HMA, failure to achieve complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), or hematologic improvement (HI) after six 4-week cycles of AZA or either four 4-week or four 6-week cycles of DAC, or relapse after initial CR, PR or HI. Bone marrow samples were collected at study baseline and throughout the study for mutational analysis as an exploratory endpoint. Baseline blast counts are described as % reported in bone marrow aspirate at screening. Genomic DNA was extracted from diagnostic bone marrow or peripheral blood samples and targeted capture deep sequencing of 295 genes were performed (median sequencing depth 500x) using Agilent's SureSelect custom panel. Modified Mutect and Pindel were used to identify high-confidence somatic mutations. Results: All data is presented as blinded aggregate results for both arms of the study. Baseline mutations are presented for 114 pts; 92 pts were randomized and 22 pts were screen failures. Median age is 72 years (59-81). The IPSS-R scores for the pts randomized were: Intermediate 5(5%), High 30 (32%) and VHR 56 (60%). In total 48 different mutations were identified at baseline prior to pts receiving study treatment. The most common mutations identified in pts were ASXL1 40%, STAG2 26%, TP53 24%, RUNX1 22%, SRSF2 and TET2 each 18%. Average number of mutations per pt was 3.06. At baseline, 4 pts (4%) had no mutations, 17 pts (18%) had only 1 mutation while 17 pts (18%) had between 6-8 mutations. N-RAS and K-RAS mutations occurred in 4 pts each (7% of pts) and all in the presence of other mutations. Mutations involving regulators of the Ras pathway (N-RAS, K-RAS, PTPN11, NF1) occurred in 12 (13%) of patients. Of note, 23 pts (25%) had IDH1 (6 pts) or IDH2 (17 pts) and the majority of these pts (68%) were High/VHR with an average blast count of 15% (range 5-27%) at study entry. The high proportion of IDH1/2 mutations observed is most likely due to inclusion of patients with RAEB-t. These results will be updated at the meeting with blinded baseline mutational analyses for all pts randomized into the study. Conclusion: The baseline mutational analyses from the INSPIRE study provides important initial insights into the genomic profile of pts with HMA failure, especially for the subset with VHR. Following analysis of the primary endpoint, it is anticipated that correlation of overall survival and clinical response with mutational status will be possible, including changes in mutations following therapy. Given the number of mutations involving the Ras pathway the efficacy of rigosertib in patients with this group of mutations will also be examined. Figure Disclosures Garcia-Manero: Amphivena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Helsinn: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Luger:Agios: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Kura: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Genetech: Research Funding; Cyslacel: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Al-Kali:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Jedrzejczak:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: travel support for hematology meetings (ASH, EBMT, EHA) ; Celgene: Other: travel support for hematology meetings (ASH, EBMT, EHA) ; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Other: travel support for hematology meetings (ASH, EBMT, EHA) . Díez-Campelo:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zbyszewski:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Cavanaugh:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Woodman:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Fruchtman:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment. Takahashi:Symbio Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Targeted Intravenous Busulfan and Fludarabine Allogeneic Transplantation Conditioning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2290-2290
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Pidala ◽  
Jongphil Kim ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Ernesto Ayala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Large Series ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Relapsed Disease ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Abstract 2290 Poster Board II-267 Reduced and intermediate intensity conditioning with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers promise to effectively control hematologic malignancies, while limiting treatment related toxicity and mortality (TRM). We aimed to examine the efficacy of IV targeted Busulfan and Fludarabine (IV-Bu/Flu) in a large series of adults with exclusively acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). One hundred adults (median age 48) with AML (CR1 49, CR2 25, REL1 8, REL2 1, PIF 16, untreated 1) were treated with Busulfan 130-145 mg/m2/day for four days with pharmacokinetic targeting on the final two days to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of 5300 (+/-10%) μmol*min/L/day and Fludarabine 40mg/m2/day for 4 days, followed by transplantation of G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (N=98) or unstimulated bone marrow (BM) (N=2) from allogeneic donors (MRD 38, MUD 38, MMUD 24). Acute GVHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus/methotrexate (N = 77), tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (N = 22), or tacrolimus/sirolimus (N = 1). Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 16 and 12 days, respectively. Non-relapse mortality was 3% at 100 days, and 15% by 1 year. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 41%. Overall survival (OS) was 59% (95% CI: 48.1 – 67.5) at 1 year, and 42% (95% CI: 30.8-53.3) at 4 years. OS at 4 years for primary AML in CR1, secondary AML in CR1, CR2, and PIF were 52.9%, 40.1%, 41.2%, and 57.5% respectively; none with relapsed disease survived to 4 years (log-rank p = 0.0014). Progression-free survival (PFS) was 53% (95% CI: 42.8 – 62.2) at 1 year, and 32.3% (95% CI: 21.8 – 43.2) at 4 years. PFS at 4 years for primary AML in CR1, secondary AML in CR1, CR2, and PIF were 44.1%, 33.4%, 33.9%, and 33.1%, respectively, while none with relapsed disease at transplant reached this endpoint (p = 0.0264). On multivariable modeling, remission status at HCT (relapsed disease HR 14.85 (95% CI: 2.12 - 104.2), p = 0.007), moderate/severe cGVHD (HR 0.281, 95% CI: 0.10 - 0.76; p = 0.013), and day 90 bone marrow (BM) chimerism ≥ 90% (HR 0.245, 95% CI: 0.08 - 0.79; p = 0.018) predicted overall survival, and day 90 BM chimerism ≥ 90% (HR of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08 - 0.45), p = 0.0002) predicted PFS. The following were not significantly related with OS or PFS: age, cytogenetics, donor relation, number of induction cycles, aGVHD prophylaxis regimen, maximum aGVHD grade, WBC at diagnosis, time in first CR, or % BM blasts prior to transplant. Day 90 BM chimerism and cGVHD were significantly related with relapse. Maximum grade of aGVHD predicted non-relapse mortality. These data support the low TRM and efficacy of IV-Bu/Flu in a large series of exclusively AML patients, and demonstrate the impact of day 90 bone marrow chimerism as an important prognostic factor. Further efforts to mitigate relapse risk after HCT are warranted, particularly in those with advanced disease at time of transplant. Disclosures: Off Label Use: IV busulfan and fludarabine for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Alsina:Ortho Biotech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Field:PDL BioPharma: Research Funding. Fernandez:Otsuka: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Overall Survival and Subgroup Analysis from a Randomized Phase III Study of Intravenous Rigosertib Versus Best Supportive Care (BSC) in Patients (pts) with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (HR-MDS) after Failure of Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 163-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Aref Al-Kali ◽  
Maria R. Baer ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background: No approved treatment options are available to HR-MDS pts after HMA therapy. Study 04-21 (“ONTIME” trial) was a Phase III, randomized, controlled study of the efficacy and safety of rigosertib, a novel small molecule inhibitor of PI3-kinase and PLK pathways, in a heterogeneous population of MDS pts who had relapsed after, failed to respond to, or progressed during administration of HMAs. The study was conducted at 87 sites in the United States and 5 European countries. Methods:From Dec 2010 to Aug 2013, 299 HR-MDS pts [<30% bone marrow blasts (BMBL)] who had progressed on (37% of total enrollment), failed to respond to (25%), or relapsed after (38%) HMA treatment were stratified on BMBL count and randomized 2:1 to receive rigosertib (199 pts) or BSC (100 pts). Rigosertib was administered at 1800 mg/24 hr for 72-hr as a continuous intravenous (CIV) ambulatory infusion, every 2 weeks for the first 16 weeks, and then every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), analyzed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis using the Kaplan-Meier method stratified on BMBL (5% to 19% vs. 20% to 30%). The trial had a 95% power to detect a 13-wk increase in median OS from 17 wks on BSC, with a 2-sided alpha = 0.05. The following results are based on 242 deaths: 161 in the rigosertib arm and 81 in the BSC arm. Results : Overall, the 2 arms were balanced in terms of baseline characteristics, with the majority of pts being male (66%), and White (82%). Age ranged from 50-90 yrs in the rigosertib arm and 55-86 years in the BSC arm (median, 74 yrs). The majority of pts (85%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1. The median duration of the last HMA therapy was 8.8 months (mo) in the rigosertib arm and 10.3 mo in the BSC arm; 127 (64%) of rigosertib pts and 57% of BSC pts were classified as “primary HMA failure” (ie, they failed to respond to or progressed during HMA therapy, as defined by Prebet et al, J Clin Oncol, 2011). A 2.3-mo improvement in median OS was found in the overall (ITT) population (8.2 mo rigosertib vs. 5.9 mo BSC) (Figure 1). The ITT survival for rigosertib was similar to that noted in Phase I/II studies (35 weeks). The stratified log-rank p-value was 0.33. The stratified hazard ratio was 0.87, which was quite different from the ratio of medians (5.9/8.2 = 0.72), due to the fact that the 2 survival curves converged at 15 mo. Notably, among the 184 patients with primary HMA failure, the median OS was 8.6 mo in the rigosertib arm (N = 127) vs. 5.3 mo in the BSC arm (N = 57), HR= 0.69, p= 0.040 (Figure 2). Multivariate Cox regression, adjusting for pretreatment prognostic factors, showed little change in the treatment effect. The following subgroups were correlated with better OS: pts with failure of/progression on HMA treatment, pts with duration of HMA treatment ≤ 9 mo, pts < 75 years of age, and pts with very high risk per IPSS-R (Figure 3). Rigosertib was well tolerated, with a median dose intensity of 92%. There were no significant compliance or operations issues related to ambulatory continuous infusion. Protocol-defined dose reductions were reported in 5% of pts, with 24% experiencing dose delays of >7 days, mostly due to unrelated adverse events (AEs). No obvious differences between rigosertib and BSC were found in the incidence of AEs (rigosertib, 99%; BSC, 85%) or of ≥ Grade 3 AEs (rigosertib, 79%; BSC, 68%). In the rigosertib arm, AEs reported by ≥ 20% of pts, irrespective of severity or causality, were nausea (35%), diarrhea (33%), constipation (31%), fatigue (30%), fever (27%), anemia (22%), and peripheral edema (21%). Rigosertib had low myelotoxicity, consistent with previous clinical experience. Conclusions:Although the primary endpoint in this Phase III study of rigosertib vs BSC in pts with HR-MDS did not reach statistical significance in the ITT population, encouraging rigosertib treatment-related improvement in OS was noted in several subgroups of MDS pts, including those with “primary HMA failure and in patients in the IPSS-R Very High Risk category. CIV therapy with rigosertib had a favorable safety profile in this orphan population of elderly pts with MDS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures Fenaux: Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene Corp.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roboz:Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Teva Oncology: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy. Wilhelm:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wilhelm:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Azarnia:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Maniar:Onconova Therapeutics, Inc: Employment.

scholarly journals A Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2749-2749
Author(s):  
Omar Nadeem ◽  
Robert A. Redd ◽  
Julia Prescott ◽  
Kelsey Tague ◽  
Veronica Romines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Study Therapy

Abstract Background: Early therapeutic intervention in high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) has demonstrated benefit based on previous studies that included treatment with lenalidomide or lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Mateos et al. N Engl J Med 2013; Lonial et al. J Clin Oncol 2020). Combination therapy with triplets has shown higher rates of deep response and improved outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma, including the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Moreau et al. N Eng J Med 2016). We present our results of phase II study of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone in HR-SMM. Methods: Patients enrolled on the study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al. (Blood 2014). The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 consecutive days for a total of 24 months period. Bone marrow samples of all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle for isolating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Results: Sixty-one patients have been enrolled in this study from February 2017 to 2020. The median age of the patients at enrollment was 64 years (range, 40 to 84), with 33 males (54.1%). The analysis was conducted on patients who have completed at least 2 cycles of therapy (n=55). Thus far, 42 (69%) patients have completed the planned 24 cycles of therapy. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 14 patients out of the 33 evaluable (42.4%) Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) results. The median number of cycles completed was 24 cycles (range: 2-24). According to the new IMWG risk stratification model (20-2-20), baseline markers showed that 32 patients (58%) were high risk, 18 (33%) were intermediate risk, and 5 (9%) were low risk. The most common grades 3 or greater toxicities were neutropenia (20%), hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (11%), rash (9%), lymphocytopenia (5%), and thrombocytopenia (5%). Stem cells were collected from all eligible patients by the end of the induction phase. No patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity. At the time of data cut off, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who completed at least 2 cycles of treatment was 90.9% (50 of 55), with 12 complete responses (CR, 21.8%), 10 very good partial responses (VGPR, 18.2%), 28 partial responses (50.9%), and 4 minimal responses (MR, 7.3%). ORR in patients who completed the induction phase (≥9 cycles) was 92.3% (n= 48 of 52), with 22 (40%) deep remissions including 12 (23.1%) and 10 (19.2%) having achieved a CR and VGPR, respectively. All patients who had a CR have also achieved a stringent CR. No patients developed progression to overt or active MM while on study therapy. After completion of study therapy, 4 patients progressed to active MM during follow up, 3 additional patients developed biochemical progression and started a new course of therapy but did not meet CRAB criteria and 7 patients confirmed biochemical PD and remain off therapy. Conclusions: The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective all oral well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma that demonstrated an ORR of &gt;90% and deep remission in &gt;40% of patients. While no patients progressed to overt MM while on therapy, some developed progression after completion of planned study therapy, indicating the possible need for higher intensification of therapy or maintenance therapy beyond 2 years in this high-risk group of patients. Longer follow-up for disease outcome is ongoing. Disclosures Nadeem: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mo: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVIE: Consultancy. Sperling: Adaptive: Consultancy. Richardson: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Cyclophosphamide, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone Significantly Improves Response over Poma/Dex in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Patients Previously Treated with Cyclophosphamide Combination Therapy - Initial Results of the Randomised Multicentre Mukseven Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3274-3274
Author(s):  
James Croft ◽  
Andrew Hall ◽  
Katrina Walker ◽  
Amy L Sherborne ◽  
Sidra Ellis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Double Hit ◽  
Abstract Submission ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Background and aims Treatment of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM) remains a challenge as most approved and commonly accessible doublet treatments induce responses (≥PR) in less than half of patients. The combination of the classical alkylator cyclophosphamide with thalidomide (CTD) or lenalidomide (CRD) is standard of care in early lines of therapy in the UK and elsewhere. Data on the clinical value of cyclophosphamide and pomalidomide combination therapy in RRMM is currently sparse and lacking for patients that have previously been treated with cyclophosphamide in earlier lines of therapy. Material and Methods MUKseven is a randomised phase II study for RRMM patients comparing cyclophosphamide (500 mg po d1, 8, 15), pomalidomide (4 mg days 1-21) and dexamethasone (40 mg; if ≥75 years 20 mg; d1, 8, 15, 21) (CPd) versus standard pomalidomide and dex (Pd). Patients with ≥2 prior lines of therapy were randomised 1:1 to receive either CPd or Pd and treated until progression. The primary endpoint of the study is PFS, secondary endpoints include response, OS and safety and toxicity. Patients underwent bone marrow sampling and peripheral blood collection at baseline, on treatment and at relapse to correlate outcomes with disease biology. The original sample size was 250 patients but due to approval of pomalidomide by the UK funding agency NICE mid-recruitment, and resulting low enrolment rates, a decision was made to close the trial early. Results In total 102 evaluable RRMM patients were randomised between March 2016 and February 2018, 51 each to CPd and Pd treatment arms that were comparable regarding age, gender, ISS and ECOG performance status. Patients had received a median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range 2-8); all had been treated with proteasome inhibitors and lenalidomide and 94% of patients had received cyclophosphamide as part of earlier lines of therapy. Trial entry criteria were permissive and allowed ongoing red cell, platelet and growth factor support to reflect real-world practice in RRMM - 11% of patients required platelet and 16% G-CSF support before starting trial therapy. Treatment with CPd was associated with a significantly higher response rate (≥PR) of 68.6% (95% CI: 54.1 - 80.9%) compared to 47.1% (CI: 32.9 - 61.5%) for Pd (P=0.018). Five patients (9.8%) on CPd treatment reached CR vs. none with Pd therapy (Table 1). PFS data is currently maturing and will be presented at the conference. At the time of abstract submission 20 patients were still on trial treatment and 22.5% of evaluable patients had received trial therapy for 12 months or longer. Anaemia, fatigue and infection of any grade were common side effects and similar in frequency between treatment arms, whereas higher grade cytopenias were more frequent with CPd than Pd. More patients experienced at least one SAE with CPd treatment (44 patients) than with Pd (36 patients). Over 80% of SAEs suspected to be related to study drug for CPd and Pd arms were infections or cytopenias requiring admission for iv therapy. Five patients on the CPd arm and 4 patients on Pd discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Site and patient adherence to central bone marrow and peripheral blood collection was high with 92% of baseline samples, 87% at C1D14, 87% at C4D14 and 43% of samples at relapse received by central laboratories. High risk genetic lesions gain(1q), del(17p) and adverse translocations t(4;14), t(14;16) and t(14;20) were profiled, amongst other changes, using molecular assays (digital MLPA, TaqMan). Of the 66 patients for whom complete results were available at the point of abstract submission, 48.5% were found to have 1 high risk lesion and 13.6% ≥2 high risk lesions ("double-hit"). The best response achieved in patients with double hit tumours was PR in 1 out of 9 evaluable patients. Further genetic profiling and related exploratory analyses are ongoing. Discussion The combination of cyclophosphamide, pomalidomide and dexamethasone significantly increases response rates and depth of response compared to pomalidomide and dexamethasone in RRMM patients, even those that have already been exposed to cyclophosphamide combination therapy in previous lines of therapy. Primary endpoint PFS data for CPd vs. Pd will be presented at the conference. Analyses of outcomes in the context of molecular profiles are ongoing and will be presented at the conference. Disclosures Pawlyn: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel support. Garg:Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: Travel Grant. Boyd:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel and Accommodation expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory role. Cook:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kaiser:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chugai: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Ropeginterferon Demonstrates Safety and Efficacy in Myelofibrosis: Pilot Study Results

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 23-23
Author(s):  
Jeanne M. Palmer ◽  
Heidi E. Kosiorek ◽  
Amylou C. Dueck ◽  
John Camoriano ◽  
Craig Zimmerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Early Disease ◽  
High Risk Disease ◽  
Study Results

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal bone marrow disorder characterized by a constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly, anemia, elevated WBC and bone marrow fibrosis. Ruxolitinib is a JAK2 inhibitor approved for patients with Intermediate-2 (INT-2) or high risk disease based on dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS), however, there are limited options for patients with early disease. Interferon alpha (IFNa) is a cytokine therapy that has been used in treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia and polycythemia vera (PV). In these diseases, there can be a reduction in the clonal burden in addition to a hematologic response. Therefore, we sought to use this therapy in patients with MF. Methods: Patients who had MF were enrolled on an IRB approved clinical protocol in a single arm, single institution study. Patients were stratified to either an early disease arm (characterized by intermediate 1 (INT-1) risk or advanced disease (Int-2 or high-risk disease based on DIPSS). Patients were started on ropeginterferon (interferon-alpha 2b) at 50 ug every two weeks, and the dose was titrated up to either 300 ug every other week, or until unacceptable toxicity. Patients were monitored for response based on IWG criteria. Results: Ten patients with MF have been enrolled on the study to date (Early: 3, Int/High: 7). Median age was 69.5 (39 - 88), four patients were female. Five patients had primary MF (PMF), 4 had post-essential thrombocythemia and 1 post PV MF. Five patients had previous treatment for their disease. Four patients continue to receive active treatment (2 early disease, and 2 advanced disease). Reasons for stopping include disease progression (3), toxicity (1), alternate treatment (1) and lack of benefit (1). The median number of cycles for those who ended treatment was 7.5 (4-47), and for those who remain on treatment, they range from 16 - 46 cycles. Five patients achieved a clinical improvement, 3 had a spleen response, and 2 had a symptom response. A grade 3 adverse event (AE) potentially attributable to the treatment occurred in 6 patients (60%), 4 (40.0%) patients had anemia, and 2 (20.0%) patients had lymphopenia. Only one patient discontinued therapy due to AEs (dizziness, atrial fibrillation). One death has occurred to date, due to an unrelated cause. Discussion: Ropeginterferon is a well-tolerated therapy that results in clinical improvement in half the patients, and appears to be well tolerated. These results, along with historic data suggesting possible reduction in clonal burden, suggest that ongoing studies are warranted to further understand the clinical benefit of ropeginterferon. Disclosures Zimmerman: Pharmaessentia: Current Employment. Mesa:Incyte: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; LaJolla Pharmaceutical Company: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Clinical trial

scholarly journals Selinexor, a First-in-Class XPO1 Inhibitor, Is Efficacious and Tolerable in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes Refractory to Hypomethylating Agents

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 233-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Taylor ◽  
Morgan Coleman ◽  
Kelsey Alvarez ◽  
Janine Pichardo ◽  
Filiz Sen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Hypomethylating Agents ◽  
Average Response

Abstract There is no standard therapy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) refractory to hypomethylating agents (HMA) and the median overall survival (OS) of HMA-refractory MDS patients with IPSS Intermediate-2/High-risk MDS is ~6 months. Here, we present data from a phase 2 clinical trial of selinexor, an oral, first-in-class Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound that inhibits XPO1, in patients with MDS refractory to HMAs. XPO1 is the major nuclear export protein responsible for shuttling many key cellular regulators out of the nucleus and is overexpressed in many cancers. Preclinical studies of selinexor have shown that inhibition of XPO1 causes nuclear retention of wildtype p53 and disruption of the NF-κB pathway, both relevant targets for MDS. Moreover, selinexor has shown promising responses in acute myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, and Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We therefore set out to determine the safety and efficacy of selinexor in MDS, and to study potential molecular correlates of response to selinexor. Patients with MDS or MDS/MPN who were refractory to azacitidine or decitabine were included (defined as either progression after initial response or if no response after >6 cycles). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR = CR + mCR + PR + HI) and secondary endpoints included safety, response duration, and OS. The starting dose was 35 mg/m2 PO twice-weekly in 28-day cycles. Bone marrow biopsies, bone marrow DNA and peripheral blood RNA were collected from serial samples and used for correlative analyses including next-generation targeted gene sequencing, RNA-seq, immunohistochemistry, and proteomics. A total of 25 patients were evaluable for safety and 19 were evaluable for response. Six patients were not evaluable for response based on unrelated death from concurrent illness (n=5) or withdrawal of consent (n=1) before completion of one cycle. The median age was 77 (range, 50-85) and the majority of pts were High- or Very High-risk by IPSS-R (72%) with >10% bone marrow blasts (70%). The ORR was 32% (all mCRs) with an average response duration of 6.8 months. An additional 42% of pts achieved stable disease (SD) for an average response duration of 6.4 months for all patients receiving clinical benefit (Figure A). The median overall survival was 9.7 months with a median follow-up of 2.1 years. Those with mCR or SD had greater survival than non-responders (Figure B). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) in the first 3 pts (thrombocytopenia (n=3) and hyponatremia (n=1)) led to reduction of the dose to 60mg flat dose twice-weekly for 2 weeks followed by 1 week off, resulting in significantly improved tolerability. The most frequently occurring AE thereafter was grade 2 or 3 fatigue. All other AEs were manageable with routine supportive care. The presence of an SF3B1 hotspot mutation was significantly associated with response to selinexor (p=0.01; Figure C). No other single mutation had a significant association, although patients with mutated TP53 and those with >3 mutations were numerically higher in the non-responders but did not reach statistical significance. The mRNA levels of a number of transcripts from the NF-κB pathway and of Myc were decreased after treatment with selinexor in responders, albeit with some variability. The levels of XPO1 mRNA increased with treatment within 4 hours of the fist dose, indicative of XPO1 target engagement with selinexor (Figure D). Further analyses are underway to determine if splicing is differentially modulated in SF3B1 mutated patients. Immunohistochemistry and proteomics for protein alterations are also ongoing. These data indicate that selinexor is safe and tolerable in MDS when given at 60mg twice-weekly for 2 weeks with 1 week off with a 32% response rate. Responses appear to be enriched in patients with SF3B1 mutations and selinexor appears to affect pathways that may be activated downstream of mutant-SF3B1, such as NF-κB and Myc. Detailed correlative and pre-clinical analyses are ongoing and should provide further illumination of the biological relevance of these markers, which will be tested prospectively in future clinical trials. Further studies of selinexor combined with targeted agents that disrupt similar or complementary oncogenic pathways in MDS could further improve responses. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Rampal: Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Stemline: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Constellation: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Park:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stein:Agios: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Tallman:AbbVie: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; AROG: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Bing Neel Syndrome: Retrospective Australasian Experience of a Rare Treatable Complication of Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia/ Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5325-5325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipti Talaulikar ◽  
Tara Cochrane ◽  
John Gibson ◽  
Nada Hamad ◽  
Phoebe Joy Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Cortical Atrophy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Motor Neuropathy ◽  
Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Csf Analysis

Abstract Introduction and aims:Bing Neel syndrome (BNS) is a rare complication of Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM)/ Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma (LPL). It is a clinicopathological entity characterised by central nervous system involvement with malignant cells. It presents with diverse symptoms and can be difficult to recognise. However, it is a treatable condition amenable to systemic and intrathecal treatment. We present the Australasian experience of this rare entity. Methods:Inclusion in the study was based on cytologically or histologically confirmed presence of lymphoplasmacytic cells in the CSF or brain biopsy. Ten patients were included from 9 sites in Australia and New Zealand. Relevant retrospective data was extracted after obtaining consent from patients or next of kin. Results: Seven of the 10 patients were males with overall mean age of 63.5 years (range: 49-78 years); 4 patients were < 60 years old. Four patients (40%) did not have a prior diagnosis of WM; the remaining 6 patients were diagnosed ~ 11 years post diagnosis of WM (range: 3 -26 years) and received 1 line of treatment (except for 2 patients who received 2 lines of treatment). Treatment regimens received included R-CVP, chlorambucil-prednisolone, DRC, FCR, oral fludarabine, and RFM. At diagnosis of BNS, IgM and/or PP levels ranged between 3 - 70 g/L with 6 (60%) patients having levels < 10 g/L. One patient had a diagnosis of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma with IgG paraprotein. Symptoms at presentation of BNS varied from headache, ptosis/ophthalmoplegia, memory loss, subacute hemiplegia, cognitive defects, hearing loss, and sensory or motor neuropathy. None of the patients had B symptoms. Lymphadenopathy was noted in 4 (40%) cases, splenomegaly in 1 (10%) and ECOG performance status ranged from 0-4 with 3 (30%) patients having an ECOG of > 2. Brain +/- spine MRI was done in all cases with 5 (50%) showing leptomeningeal involvement. Orbital infiltration or enhancement of optic or ophthalmic nerves was noted in 3 cases (30%), and 3 patients (30%) had focal signs/masses. 1 had cortical atrophy, and 3 had normal MRI. CSF analysis was abnormal in all cases on cytology with demonstration of abnormal lymphocytes. Where immunophenotyping was performed, it showed presence of CD5, CD10 negative B cells. MYD88 L265P was detected in 3 patients (30%). Treatment of BNS included systemic chemoimmunotherapy in 30%, CNS penetrating intravenous agents in 40%, Ibrutinib in 50%, intrathecal chemotherapy in 30%, and radiotherapy in 10%. More than 1 modality of treatment was used in 40% of patients. Ibrutinib was administered as frontline treatment in combination with high dose MTX or IT chemotherapy in 3 patients, and as single agent monotherapy in 1 patient. Ibrutinib was used as second line treatment in 2 patients with both achieving CR. The number of cycles administered were 2.6 (range 1-9). Response data was available in 9 patients with ORR in 6 (1 CR, 5 PR) and non-response in 3. All patients except the one treated with Ibrutinib monotherapy had at least PR. With a median follow-up time of 20 months, 3 patients have died. The median overall survival of patients was not reached. The 1-year and 3-year OS rates were 80% (95% CI 41-95%) and 60% (16-87%), respectively (Figure 1). Conclusion:BNS should be suspected in WM patients who develop focal or nonspecific neurological symptoms. It can be readily diagnosed on radiological scans i.e. brain and spinal MRI, and/or on CSF analysis. It can be treated with a number of systemic and intrathecal drugs including Ibrutinib, which crosses the blood brain barrier. Fig 1 legend:Kaplan Meir curve demonstrating median overall survival of patients (not reached) and 1-year and 3-year OS rates of 80% (95% CI 41-95%) and 60% (16-87%), respectively. Disclosures Talaulikar: Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Ho:Celgene: Other: Travel to meeting ; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel to meeting; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Simpson:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Novartis: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; MSD: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding, TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Honoraria. Castillo:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Clinical Benefit of Ropeginterferon Alfa 2b (P1101) in Patients with Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5475-5475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Palmer ◽  
Heidi E. Kosiorek ◽  
Craig Zimmerman ◽  
Oleh Zagrijtschuk ◽  
John Camoriano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Early Disease ◽  
High Risk Disease

Abstract Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal bone marrow disorder characterized by a constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly, anemia, elevated WBC and bone marrow fibrosis. Ruxolitinib is a JAK2 inhibitor approved for patients with Intermediate-2 (INT-2) or high risk disease based on dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS)), however, there are limited options for patients with early disease. Interferon alpha (IFNa) is a cytokine therapy that has been used in treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia and polycythemia vera (PV). In these diseases, there can be a reduction in the clonal burden in addition to a hematologic response. Therefore, we sought to use this therapy in patients with MF. Methods: Patients who had MF were enrolled on an IRB approved clinical protocol in a single arm, single institution study. Patients were stratified to either an early disease arm (characterized by intermediate 1 (INT-1) risk or advanced disease (Int-2 or high risk disease based on DIPSS). Patients were started on Ropeginterferon alfa 2b (P1101) at 50 ug every two weeks, and the dose was titrated up to either 300 ug every other week, or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were monitored for response based on international working group criteria. Results: Demographics: Eight patients with MF have been enrolled on the study to date (Early: 2, Int/High: 6). Median age was 69.5 (45 - 88), five patients were female. Five patients had primary MF (PMF) and 3 had post-essential thrombocythemia or post PV MF. Three patients had previous treatment for their disease. Four patients continue to receive active treatment (2 early disease, and 2 advanced disease), and for those who remain on treatment, they range from 7 - 29 cycles. Efficacy: Three patients experienced a clinical improvement (1 based on MPN-SAF total symptom score, and 2 based on reduction of spleen size). Both early stage patients have had a CI based on spleen responses as their best response and currently remain on treatment. The remaining 2 who are on therapy had stable disease. Those who remain on therapy have been receiving treatment for 7-29 cycles with continued response. Toxicity: A grade 3 adverse event (AE) potentially attributable to the treatment occurred in 4 patients (50%), 3 (37.5%) patients had anemia, and 2 (25.0%) patients had lymphopenia. Only one patient discontinued therapy due to AEs (dizziness, atrial fibrillation). Reasons for stopping include disease progression (1), toxicity (1) and lack of benefit (2). The median number of cycles for those who ended treatment was 8 (4-10). No deaths have occurred. Discussion: P1101 appears to be a well-tolerated therapy that has shown a durable clinical improvement in 37.5% in a small study. These results, along with historic data suggesting possible reduction in clonal burden, suggest that ongoing studies are warranted to further understand the clinical benefit of P1101 in MF. Disclosures Palmer: Novartis: Research Funding. Zimmerman:PharmaEssentia: Employment. Zagrijtschuk:PharmaEssentia: Employment. Mesa:Gilead: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy; Promedior: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcome of Hypomethylating Agents in Hypocellular MDS: Mayo Clinic Experience

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5254-5254
Author(s):  
Sonia Cerquozzi ◽  
Hassan B Alkhateeb ◽  
Moritz Binder ◽  
Darci Zblewski ◽  
Shahrukh K Hashmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Cytogenetic Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hypomethylating Agents ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Very High

Abstract Introduction: Hypocellular myelodysplastic syndrome (h-MDS) represents only a small portion of MDS, of which, the clinical significance and outcomes are not well understood. Both laboratory and clinical evidence suggests that h-MDS shares immune-mediated pathogenic mechanisms similar to acquired aplastic anemia. As a result, immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has been the mainstay treatment. Since h-MDS is poorly understood and reported response rates to IST vary, we retrospectively reviewed the outcome of our patients with hypocellular MDS and identified the effectiveness of alternative therapy using hypomethylating agents (HMA). Methods: AllMDS patients over a 13-year period (June 1997 to May 2010) were captured after an IRB approval was obtained. Patients' demographics, labs, bone marrow aspirates and biopsies as well as cytogenetic data were collected. We used the currently accepted age-adjusted criteria to define hypocellularity as ≤ 30% in patients <70 years old, and ≤20% in >70 years old. Only patients with available response data were included in the final analysis. Survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: We identified 65 (8%) h-MDS patients from a cohort of 827 adult MDS. Median age was 68 years (range, 20-90), with 69% males. The largest group of patients were RAEB-1 at 9 (14%) and RAEB-2 at 14 (22%) along with RCMD at 18 (28%) and 15 (23%) MDS-U, 2 (3%) MDS 5q, 4 (6%) RARS and 2 (3%) were considered atypical. Cytogenetic analysis was normal in 17 (26%) with 7 (11%) having trisomy 8, and 11 (16%) and 14 (22%) having abnormalities of chromosome 7 and 5, respectively. IPSS-R were very low, low, intermediate, high, and very high in 4%, 30%, 28%, 21% and 17%, respectively. Leukemic transformation (LT) occurred in 6 (9%). The 4 year overall survival and progression free survival was 35% and 34%, respectively. Median overall survival and progression free survival was 30.2 and 29.7 months, respectively. Nine out 65 h-MDS patients were treated with a HMA, azacitidine (4) or decitabine (5). The median age of patients was 71 years (range, 66-85) with 6 (66%) being males. The median cellularity of the diagnostic bone marrow was 15% with the majority of patients presenting with RAEB-1 (11%) and RAEB-2 (55%) classification and 2 (22%) cases of RCMD as well as 1 (11%) case of MDS with isolated 5q. Cytogenetic analysis was normal in 3 (33%). IPSS-R were low in 1 (11%), intermediate in 4 (44%), high in 1 (11%) and very high risk in 3 (33%). The median time to initiation of a HMA from diagnosis was 5 months with response assessed at a median of 4.2 months. Two patients had received prior therapy including lenalidomide (for MDS 5q) and one had 1 cycle of trial therapy. Two patients (22%) achieved a marrow complete remission at a median time of 2.95 months; with one case of relapse at 9.8 months using HMA. Three patients (33%) had LT at a median time of 7.9 months post initiation of HMA. Median overall survival of patients with LT was 20 days. A total of 4 (44%) patients remain alive with a leukemia free survival of 67% at 2 years. In comparing to h-MDS patients without HMA treatment versus HMA treated, median OS was 28.2 vs 50.9 months (p=0.41) and PFS was 28.1 vs 40.6 months (p=0.69), respectively. Conclusions: The results from our clinical experience confirm that hypocellular MDS is a rare variant and that it is distinct from normocellular/hypercellular MDS. Two thirds of h-MDS received HMA for the treatment of higher risk disease (RAEB1-2). HMA has some efficacy in h-MDS. Further studies are warranted to better understand the clinical significance and outcomes of hypocellular MDS. Disclosures Binder: American Society of Hematology: Research Funding. Al-Kali:Celgene: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document