Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab in Treatment-Naive Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: Results from a Multicenter, Phase 2 Study

Abstract Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent NHL. Current chemoimmunotherapeutic regimens used for FL are not curative. Rituximab, as a single-agent and in combination with chemotherapy, is a commonly used approach for frontline therapy of FL. Ibrutinib, a first-in-class, once-daily, oral inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, has shown activity in a phase 1, first-in-human, dose-escalation trial in patients with relapsed/refractory FL, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 38% (6/16) including 3 complete responses [CRs]) (Advani, JCO 2013). In a multicenter, open-label phase 2 trial (PCYC-1125-CA), we evaluated the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in combination with rituximab in treatment-naïve patients with FL. Methods: Patients with treatment-naïve, histologically confirmed FL (Grade 1, 2 and 3a, stage II-IV disease) received oral ibrutinib 560 mg once daily until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity, combined with rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV once weekly for 4 doses for the first 4 weeks of the study. The primary endpoint was ORR (2007 IWG criteria) as assessed by investigators. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Among 60 treated patients in study Arm 1, the median age was 58 years (range, 32-84), with 30% of patients aged ≥65 years, and 98% of patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. At baseline, 80% of patients had Stage III/IV disease, and 10% of patients had grade 3a FL. The mean duration of treatment on ibrutinib was 9.2 months. At a median follow-up of 10.2 months (range, 1.2-16.2), the investigator-assessed ORR was 82% (95% CI: 70.1-89.4), with a CR rate of 27% and PR rate of 55% in all treated patients (Figure). The median time to best response was 2.7 months (range, 1.1-8.3). Median PFS, OS, and DOR are not reached as a result of a small number of PD (n=5) and death (n=1) events. Any-grade adverse events (AEs; ≥20%) included fatigue (63%), diarrhea (50%), nausea (42%), constipation (28%), headache (27%), maculopapular rash (27%), myalgia (23%), vomiting (23%), cough (22%), infusion-related reaction (22%), and dry eye (20%). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 43% of patients, and those occurring in >1 patient included fatigue and maculopapular rash (5% each), and neutropenia and hypertension (3% each). There was 1 death several months after study discontinuation due to Hodgkin's lymphoma. Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 13% of patients (12% grade 3 or 4). Any-grade bleeding was reported in 22% of patients, with only 1 grade 2 bleeding event (petechiae); all other events were grade 1. Atrial fibrillation ≥grade 3 occurred in 1 patient. Secondary malignancies were reported in 4 patients: Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=1; grade 3 and 5); fallopian tube cancer (n=1; grade 3); melanocytic nevus (n=1; grade 1); and basal cell carcinoma (n=1; grade 2). Overall, 28% of patients discontinued ibrutinib in the trial (AEs: 12%; PD: 8%; patient decision: 5%; and investigator decision: 3%). At the time of analysis, 72% of patients continued treatment. Overall, the study treatment was well tolerated. Conclusions: In treatment-naïve patients with FL, ibrutinib combined with 4 cycles of rituximab demonstrates robust clinical activity with a high overall response rate. The combination is well tolerated; AEs were primarily grade 1-2 and as expected based on experience with single-agent ibrutinib and previously tested ibrutinib combinations. Figure 1. Best Overall Response Rates in All Treated Patients (N=60) and Maximum Percentage Improvement from Baseline SPD (N=60) Figure 1. Best Overall Response Rates in All Treated Patients (N=60) and Maximum Percentage Improvement from Baseline SPD (N=60) Disclosures Off Label Use: Ibrutinib for follicular lymphoma. Nastoupil:AbbVie: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding. Knapp:Celgene: Research Funding; Heron Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Brystol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding. Flinn:Cephalon, Inc; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd; Genentech, inc; Gilead: Research Funding. Chen:Genentech: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Bhatia:CHOP LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria. Martin:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Gilead: Consultancy. Suzuki:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Beaupre:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership. Neuenburg:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of Ofatumumab, a Novel Human CD20 Monoclonal Antibody, as Single Agent Therapy in Rituximab-Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.935.935 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 935-935 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Anton Hagenbeek ◽

Luis Fayad ◽

Vincent Delwail ◽

Jean Francois Rossi ◽

Eric Jacobsen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Single Agent ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 935 Introduction: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who are refractory to rituximab-based therapy have a need for new non-cytotoxic treatment options. Ofatumumab targets a unique small-loop epitope on CD20 and elicits rapid and efficient in vitro cell lysis via complement-dependent cytotoxicity, even in rituximab-resistant B cells that express high levels of complement inhibitory proteins. Ofatumumab as single agent showed activity in relapsed/refractory FL, including in some patients previously exposed to rituximab (Hagenbeek et al, Blood 2008). Here we report preliminary results from an international, single-arm trial assessing ofatumumab monotherapy in patients with rituximab-refractory FL. Methods: Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years), with Grade 1 or 2 CD20+ FL considered refractory to rituximab alone or in combination with chemotherapy, were enrolled between Sept 2006 and Sept 2008 (N=116). Refractoriness to rituximab (at least 4 doses) was defined as failure to achieve at least a partial response, disease progression during rituximab treatment, or disease progression following a response within 6 months of last treatment with rituximab-containing regimens. Patients received 8 weekly infusions of ofatumumab (Dose 1, 300 mg; Doses 2–8, 500 or 1000 mg); glucocorticoid premedication was required before infusions 1 and 2, and acetaminophen and antihistamine were administered before every infusion. The primary endpoint was objective response (International Working Group criteria) in the 1000 mg dose group over 6 months from the start of treatment, as assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Results: Table 1 summarizes the baseline characteristics; 90% of patients received all 8 ofatumumab doses. The median follow-up time on the study was 4.7 months overall and 5.5 months for the 1000 mg group. The overall response rate (ORR) in the 1000 mg group was 10% (95% CI: 4, 17%), including 1 complete response. Stable disease was observed in 50% of patients. In the 1000 mg group, the median duration of response was 6.0 months (95% CI: 2.8, upper limit not estimable) and median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.9, 9.1). The ORR in the total population was 11% (95% CI: 5, 17%). Among patients who were refractory to prior rituximab monotherapy (n=27), the ORR was 22% (95% CI: 7, 38%). The ORR among patients who were refractory to rituximab maintenance therapy (n=44) and rituximab combined with chemotherapy (n=45) was 9% (95% CI: 1, 18%) and 7% (95% CI: 0, 14%), respectively. During treatment and up to 30 days following the last dose, the most common AEs (>10% of patients) included rash (15%), urticaria (14%), fatigue (14%), pruritis (13%), nausea (12%), pyrexia (11%) and cough (11%); grade 3–4 infusion-related reactions occurred in only 3 patients (all grade 3 events), none of which were considered serious events; grade 3–4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia in 5% of patients, anemia in 3% and thrombocytopenia in 1%; grade 3 infections (sepsis, febrile neutropenia) occurred in 2 patients. Conclusions: The majority of patients with rituximab-refractory FL in this study were heavily pretreated, were also refractory to chemotherapy and had high-risk FLIPI scores. Although response rates were low with single-agent ofatumumab in patients refractory to rituximab-chemotherapy, a higher response rate was observed in patients who were refractory to rituximab monotherapy, indicating activity despite being refractory to single-agent rituximab. Ofatumumab was well tolerated in this heavily-pretreated population. Infusion reactions were manageable and no unexpected toxicities were observed. Further investigations with ofatumumab are warranted, including in combination with other therapies in patients with FL. Disclosures: Hagenbeek: Roche, Bayer Schering Pharma, Genmab: Advisory roles. Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an investigational anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, currently under development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia and follicular lymphoma) as well as autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis).. Fayad:GlaxoSmithKline, Genmab: Research Funding. Rossi:GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator on trial funded by GSK. Kuliczkowski:GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator on trial funded by GSK. Link:Genentech: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Radford:GlaxoSmithKline: Equity Ownership. Hellmann:Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gupta:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Arning:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Begtrup:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schultz:Genmab: Employment. Bang:Genmab: Employment. Russell:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. Czuczman:GlaxoSmithKline: Advisory Board, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab: Advisory Board, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase II Study of the Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Bortezomib-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (PANORAMA 2)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.814.814 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 814-814 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Paul G. Richardson ◽

Melissa Alsina ◽

Donna M. Weber ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Sagar Lonial ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Treatment Phase ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 814FN2 Background: Patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and an extremely poor prognosis. A recent study of patients who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD, thalidomide or lenalidomide) demonstrated a median event-free survival of only 5 months (Kumar S et al, Leukemia, 2011). Panobinostat is an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that increases acetylation of proteins involved in multiple oncogenic pathways. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity of the combination of panobinostat and bortezomib through dual inhibition of the aggresome and proteasome pathways. In a phase I study (B2207) of patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat + bortezomib, clinical responses (≥ minimal response [MR]) were observed in 65% of patients, including in patients with bortezomib-refractory disease. PANORAMA 2 seeks to expand upon these preliminary results and seeks to determine whether panobinostat can sensitize resistant patients to a bortezomib-containing therapeutic regimen. Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single arm, phase II study of panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. Patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory MM (≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and who had progressed on or within 60 days of the last bortezomib-based therapy) are treated in 2 phases. Treatment phase 1 consists of 8 three-week cycles of oral panobinostat (20 mg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12) + intravenous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) + oral dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). Patients demonstrating clinical benefit (≥ stable disease) can proceed to treatment phase 2, consisting of 4 six-week cycles of panobinostat (20 mg TIW 2 weeks on 1 week off, and repeat) + bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 22, 29) + dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). The primary endpoint is overall response (≥ partial response [PR]), as defined by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 1998 criteria, in the first 8 cycles of treatment phase 1. A Simon 2-stage design is used to test the primary endpoint where ≥ 4 responses (≥ PR) in 24 patients are needed in stage 1 in order to proceed to stage 2, where ≥ 9 responses in all patients (N = 47) are required to reject the null hypothesis (overall response rate ≤ 10%). Results: A sufficient number of responses ≥ PR were observed in stage 1 to allow for enrollment to continue to stage 2. As of 15 July 2011, 53 patients with bortezomib-refractory MM were enrolled. Safety and demographic data were available for 48 patients. The median age was 61 (41–88) years. Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 4 (2–14) prior regimens, and most patients (69%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Efficacy data were available for 44 patients. At the time of this analysis, 9 patients achieved ≥ PR (2 near CR [nCR] and 7 PR) as best overall response, and an additional 7 patients achieved an MR. Responders exhibited a long duration on therapy, and, to date, 8 patients have proceeded to treatment phase 2. The 2 patients with nCR have received ≥ 10 cycles of treatment (duration of therapy 190 and 253 days). Four patients who achieved PR have received ≥ 9 cycles (duration of therapy 155–225 days). Updated response data will be presented. Common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included, fatigue (52%), diarrhea (41%), thrombocytopenia (38%), nausea (38%), and anemia (21%). Gastrointestinal AEs were generally mild, with a relatively low incidence of grade 3/4 events. Grade 3/4 AEs were generally hematologic in nature, with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia reported in 38%, 12%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Other common nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (10%) and pneumonia (10%). Of note, to date, a relatively low rate of peripheral neuropathy (17%) has been observed. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy has been observed. Conclusions: The combination of panobinostat and bortezomib is a promising treatment for patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. These data, along with forthcoming data from the phase III study of panobinostat/placebo + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM (PANORAMA 1), will further define the potential role of panobinostat in the treatment of patients with MM. Disclosures: Richardson: Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alsina:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weber:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Warsi:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ondovik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mukhopadhyay:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Study Of Single-Agent Brentuximab Vedotin For Front-Line Therapy Of Hodgkin Lymphoma In Patients Age 60 Years and Above: Interim Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4389.4389 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4389-4389 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Christopher A. Yasenchak ◽

Robert Chen ◽

Jeff P. Sharman ◽

Ralph V. Boccia ◽

Beata Holkova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antitumor Activity ◽

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Brentuximab Vedotin ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

Multi Agent ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in patients aged ≥60 years has disproportionately inferior outcomes as compared to HL in younger patients. This can be mostly attributed to treatment-related factors that compromise cure rates. Comorbidities in older patients are associated with higher rates of treatment-related toxicities and can prevent delivery of standard intensity and/or duration of chemotherapy. A retrospective multicenter analysis showed an increased incidence of bleomycin-associated pulmonary toxicity (32%; with a mortality rate of 25%) in HL patients aged ≥ 60 who received ABVD for frontline therapy (Evens 2012). Novel therapeutic approaches with improved efficacy and tolerability are needed for this population. Brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS®) is an antibody-drug conjugate that comprises an anti-CD30 antibody conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule-disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E. Robust antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity has been demonstrated in HL patients who relapse after conventional chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplant. A retrospective analysis of patients aged ≥60 years with relapsed/refractory CD30+ lymphomas across 7 single-agent brentuximab vedotin studies showed antitumor activity and clinical response duration consistent with those observed in younger patients (Fanale 2012). Thus, this ongoing phase 2, single-arm, open-label study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brentuximab vedotin as frontline monotherapy for HL patients aged ≥60 years (NCT01716806). Methods The population to be enrolled includes ∼30 treatment-naïve patients with classical HL (Stages I–IV). Eligible patients must be aged ≥60 years, have an ECOG status ≤3, and be ineligible for or have declined conventional chemotherapy. Brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg is administered every 3 weeks by IV infusion. Patients achieving stable disease (SD) or better can receive up to 16 cycles of treatment, after which therapy can be continued for those experiencing clinical benefit. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Response assessments are performed at Cycles 2, 4, 8, 12, and EOT (including PET at Cycles 2, 8, and EOT). Results Thirteen patients with treatment-naïve classical HL have been enrolled to date. Median age was 75 years (range, 64 to 92) and approximately half of the patients were male (54%). Seven patients (54%) had moderate age-related renal insufficiency at baseline (creatinine clearance ≥30 and<60). Thus far, patients have received a median of 5 cycles of brentuximab vedotin treatment (range, 1 to 11). Four patients discontinued treatment, 2 due to progressive disease, 1 due to a serious adverse event (Grade 3 orthostatic hypotension), and 1 due to patient decision. Of the 11 patients with a response assessment (see table), the ORR was 82% (n=9) and the complete remission (CR) rate was 64% (n=7). For the 10 patients who had interim PET scans after 2 cycles of therapy, the mean decrease in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) between baseline and Cycle 2 was 83%. Cycle 2 PET scans were negative (Deauville Score 1-3) in 36% of patients, and the range of duration of response was 0.1+ to 20.6+ weeks thus far. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥15% of patients included neutrophil count decreased, peripheral sensory neuropathy, pruritus, and rash (n=2 each); most events were Grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 treatment-related AEs included neutrophil count decreased, rash, and orthostatic hypotension (n=1 each). No Grade 4 or 5 events have been observed to date. Conclusions In this interim analysis of patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed HL, compelling antitumor activity with single-agent brentuximab vedotin has been demonstrated. To date, a response rate of 82% has been shown in this historically challenging population of patients who either declined or were not eligible for standard chemotherapy. Preliminary safety data demonstrate tolerability in this patient population and the data are consistent with the current safety profile of brentuximab vedotin. Disclosures: Yasenchak: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin is indicated for treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous stem cell transplant or after failure of at least two prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens in patients who are not ASCT candidates and for the treatment of patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma after failure of at least one prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. Chen:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel expenses Other. Sharman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel expenses Other; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Boccia:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Holkova:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Rosen:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Advisory/scientific board membership Other, Honoraria, Research Funding. Friedberg:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Meara:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Five-Year Experience with Single-Agent Ibrutinib in Patients with Previously Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.233.233 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 233-233 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

Susan M. O'Brien ◽

Richard R. Furman ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Jan Burger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Over Time

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) including pts with del17p. The phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102 trial showed single-agent efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve (TN; O'Brien, Lancet Oncol 2014) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL (Byrd, N Engl J Med 2013). We report efficacy and safety results of the longest follow-up to date for ibr-treated pts. Methods: Pts received 420 or 840 mg ibr QD until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Overall response rate (ORR) including partial response (PR) with lymphocytosis (PR-L) was assessed using updated iwCLL criteria. Responses were assessed by risk groups: unmutated IGVH, complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 unrelated chromosomal abnormalities by stimulated cytogenetics assessed by a reference lab), and in hierarchical order for del17p, then del11q. In the long-term extension study PCYC-1103, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs requiring dose reduction or discontinuation were collected. Results: Median age of the 132 pts with CLL/SLL (31 TN, 101 R/R) was 68 y (range, 37-84) with 43% ≥70 y. Baseline CK was observed in 41/112 (37%) of pts. Among R/R pts, 34 (34%) had del17p, 35 (35%) del11q, and 79 (78%) unmutated IGVH. R/R pts had a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-12). Median time on study was 46 m (range, 0-67) for all-treated pts, 60 m (range, 0-67.4) for TN pts, and 39 m (range, 0-67) for R/R pts. The ORR (per investigator) was 86% (complete response [CR], 14%) for all-treated pts (TN: 84% [CR, 29%], R/R: 86% [CR, 10%]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for TN and 52 m for R/R pts with 60 m estimated PFS rates of 92% and 43%, respectively (Figure 1). In R/R pts, median PFS was 55 m (95% confidence intervals [CI], 31-not estimable [NE]) for pts with del11q, 26 m (95% CI,18-37) for pts with del17p, and NR (95% CI, 40-NE) for pts without del17p, del11q, trisomy 12, or del13q. Median PFS was 33 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and NR for pts with and without CK, and 43 m (95% CI, 32-NE) and 63 m (95% CI, 7-NE) for pts with unmutated and mutated IGVH, respectively(Figure 2). Among R/R pts, median PFS was 63 m (95% CI, 37-NE) for pts with 1-2 prior regimens (n=27, 3 pts with 1 prior therapy) and 59 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and 39 m (95% CI, 26-NE) for pts with 3 and ≥4 prior regimens, respectively. Median duration of response was NR for TN pts and 45 m for R/R pts. Pts estimated to be alive at 60 m were: TN, 92%; all R/R, 57%; R/R del17p, 32%; R/R del 11q, 61%; R/R unmutated IGVH, 55%. Among all treated pts, onset of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs was highest in the first year and decreased during subsequent years. With about 5 years of follow-up, the most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (26%), pneumonia (22%), neutropenia (17%), and atrial fibrillation (9%). Study treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 27 pts (20%) and disease progression in 34 pts (26%). Of all treated pts, 38% remain on ibr treatment on study including 65% of TN pts and 30% of R/R pts. Conclusions: Single-agent ibrutinib continues to show durable responses in pts with TN or R/R CLL/SLL including those with del17p, del11q, or unmutated IGVH. With extended treatment, CRs were observed in 29% of TN and 10% of R/R pts, having evolved over time. Ibrutinib provided better PFS outcomes if administered earlier in therapy than in the third-line or beyond. Those without CK experienced more favorable PFS and OS than those with CK. Ibrutinib was well tolerated with the onset of AEs decreasing over time, allowing for extended dosing for 65% of TN and 30% of R/R pts who continue treatment. Disclosures O'Brien: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Coutre:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Burger:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Sharman:Gilead: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wierda:Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Luan:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. James:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Results of a Phase II Study of Obinutuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide in Previously Untreated, High Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma (FL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129422 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 125-125 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽

Jason R. Westin ◽

Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽

Hun Ju Lee ◽

Luis Fayad ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Tumor Burden ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

High Tumor Burden ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Introduction: FL, the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, is characterized by a defective immune microenvironment that suppresses normal T-cell and natural-killer (NK)-cell activity. The clinical course is often depicted by high initial response rates coupled with a prolonged natural history and repeated relapses with most patients (pts) succumbing to their disease. Effective, well tolerated therapies are desirable. Obinutuzumab (O) is a humanized, type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody glycoengineered for enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Lenalidomide (len) is an immunomodulatory agent that binds the cereblon E3 ubiquitin ligase complex resulting in recruitment, ubiquitination, and degradation of transcription factors Aiolos and Ikaros resulting in T-cell and NK-cell activation. Therefore, combining O with len is anticipated to be synergistic in augmenting the innate and adaptive immune response in FL. The combination has been shown to be well tolerated and effective in relapsed FL (Fowler ICML 2017). Therefore, we sought to explore the efficacy and safety of O-len in previously untreated, high tumor burden FL. Methods: We conducted as single-center, phase 2 study in previously untreated, stage II, III, or IV, high tumor burden (defined by GELF) FL (grade 1, 2 or 3A). Pts received 1000mg of O on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, day 1 of cycles 2-6, and day 1 of even numbered cycles, cycle 8-30. Cycle length was 28 days. Len was administered as 20mg on days 1-21 of cycles 1-6. Pts in a complete response (CR) after 6 cycles received reduced dose len (10mg on days 1-21) for cycles 7-18. Among pts in a partial response (PR) after 6 cycles, len was continued at 20mg for the next 3-6 cycles or until CR, whichever occurred first, len was then dose reduced to 10mg on days 1-21 for the remainder of 18 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years (according to Lugano 2014 criteria). Secondary endpoints included: safety, CR, PR, overall response (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Results: 90 pts with high tumor burden FL were enrolled. Median age was 58 years (range 33-84), 52% (N=47) were male, 67 (74%) had an ECOG performance status of 0, 9 (10%) had stage II, 23 (26%) stage III, and 58 (64%) had stage IV disease. The majority had grade 1/2 FL (80%). Twenty-one percent had low risk FLIPI scores, 37% intermediate risk, and 42% were high risk. With a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1-30 months), the 2-year PFS estimate is 96% (95% CI 92-100%) with only 2 pts experiencing progression to date. The ORR is 98% (85 CR, 1 PR), 92% achieved a CR at the first response assessment (cycle 4, day 1). Correlative studies are underway including serial circulating tumor DNA measurements. No deaths have been observed to date. Eleven pts (12%) discontinued therapy as a result of an adverse event (AE), upper respiratory infection was the most common reason (N=5). Other reasons included bradycardia with sick sinus syndrome, urinary tract infection, constipation, abdominal pain, fatigue, foot neuroma (N=1 for each instance). The most common grade 3 or higher AEs include neutropenia (16%, grade 3 N=5, grade 4 N= 9), rash (10%), lung infection (4%), neutropenic fever (1%). Conclusions: O-Len was associated with very high CR rates and 2-year PFS estimates in untreated, high tumor burden FL. The toxicity profile was manageable. Further study of this effective, immune therapy approach in untreated FL is warranted. Figure Disclosures Nastoupil: Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Parmar:Cellenkos Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MoreHealth: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; BioInvent: Consultancy, Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aviara: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Neelapu:Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene: Consultancy; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Poseida: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fowler:ABBVIE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Lenalidomide in untreated follicular lymphoma

Download Full-text

A Phase 1b Clinical Trial of Dacetuzumab in Combination with Rituximab and Gemcitabine: Multiple Responses Observed in Patients with Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.586.586 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 586-586 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Andres Forero-Torres ◽

Nancy L Bartlett ◽

Sunita D Nasta ◽

Donald Northfelt ◽

Anne Beaven ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antitumor Activity ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Gene Signature ◽

Median Number ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Expansion Cohort

Abstract Abstract 586 Background: Dacetuzumab (SGN-40), a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD40, mediates antitumor activity through multiple mechanisms of action, including effector cell functions (ADCC/ADCP) and direct apoptotic signal transduction. Ongoing evaluation of the molecule has led to 2 additional key findings: a gene signature that predicts sensitivity to single-agent dacetuzumab, and upregulation of the pro-apoptotic and chemosensitizing transcription factor TAp63αa when dacetuzumab is combined with rituximab (R) and gemcitabine (GEM). In prior single-agent dacetuzumab trials, several patients who were immediately treated with GEM after progressing achieved unexpected responses. These observations provided rationale for further analysis of the combination of dacetuzumab, R and GEM. Methods: A phase 1b dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and adverse event profile of dacetuzumab, R and GEM was conducted in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients received dacetuzumab at cohort-specific doses of 8 or 12 mg/kg IV weekly in combination with R (375 mg/m2 IV for 1 cycle, then once/28-day cycle) and GEM (1000 mg/m2 IV weekly or biweekly) in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme. A maximum number of 8 cycles was permitted. Eligible patients included those with de novo DLBCL, including transformed lymphoma and follicular grade 3, who failed potentially curative therapy. Results: Thirty-one patients with a median age of 68 years (range 29–80) were enrolled and treated in the study (3 patients in each of 3 cohorts + 22 in an expansion cohort). The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range 1–18); 10 patients (32%) had transformed histology and 4 (13%) had prior ASCT. The median number of cycles received was 3 (range 1–8), although 11 patients are still on treatment. Three patients in the first cohort required dose reduction of GEM due to transient, non-dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. The protocol was thus amended to administer GEM on a biweekly schedule. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and MTD was not defined. Based on pharmacokinetic modeling suggesting no significant difference in exposure between dose levels, 8 mg/kg of dacetuzumab was chosen as the dose for the expansion cohort. The combination of dacetuzumab, R and GEM was generally well tolerated. Across all cohorts, the most common adverse events (> 15%) were nausea (42%), thrombocytopenia (35%), fatigue (32%), headache (29%), anorexia (19%), dyspnea (19%), pyrexia (19%), diarrhea (16%), and neutropenia (16%), the majority of which were Grade 1 or 2. Grade 3/4 adverse events related to dacetuzumab occurred infrequently. One patient experienced Grade 3 stress cardiomyopathy that resolved; this patient had a history of congestive heart failure. One patient developed pneumonitis in the left lung and acute respiratory distress syndrome, and subsequently died due to pulmonary toxicity; this patient had received prior radiation therapy to the left chest. There was preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. Of the 28 patients with response assessments, 7 patients achieved CR, 8 PR, 7 SD, and 6 PD per investigator assessment of response, yielding an objective response rate of 54%. Of interest, 1 patient who previously failed ASCT achieved a CR and was able to undergo allogeneic transplant. To date, this patient remains in CR. Conclusion: The combination of dacetuzumab, R and biweekly GEM was generally well tolerated. Evidence of antitumor activity with this combination is encouraging as multiple responses were observed in a population with heavily pre-treated patients. Further investigation with a randomized trial is warranted to more fully characterize safety and efficacy and to determine if sensitivity to this combination correlates with the previously identified single-agent predictive gene signature. Disclosures: Forero-Torres: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Gemcitabine has not been FDA approved for treatment of lymphoma. Dacetuzumab is an investigational agent.. Bartlett:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Nasta:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech: Speakers Bureau. Northfelt:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Beaven:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Myint:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Whiting:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Drachman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moskowitz:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I Trial of Everolimus and Rituximab or Everolimus, Bortezomib and Rituximab in Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2705.2705 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2705-2705 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Irene M. Ghobrial ◽

Erica N Boswell ◽

Ranjit Banwait ◽

Tiffany Poon ◽

Amanda Donovan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Recommended Dose ◽

Synergistic Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Risk Patients ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2705 INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of the combination of everolimus and rituximab, or everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab in relapsed and/or relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia. This trial was based on our preclinical studies that demonstrated synergistic activity of everolimus and bortezomib with rituximab in WM cell lines, and based on our favorable clinical experience with everolimus as single agent in the treatment of WM. METHODS: Eligibility criteria include: 1) patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory WM with any number of prior lines of therapy, including everolimus and bortezomib 2) not completely refractory to rituximab 3) measurable disease by monoclonal IgM protein in the serum and lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow, 4) Not receiving chemotherapy > 3 weeks, or biological/novel therapy for WM > 2 weeks. A cycle is 28 days and a total of 6 cycles are given, followed by everolimus maintenance for 2 years. Two stages with a total of four dose levels were planned. In stage A, patients received everolimus at the recommended dose orally daily for 28 days and rituximab at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. In stage B, patients received everolimus at the recommended dose orally daily for 28 days, bortezomib at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15 every 28 days, and rituximab at the recommended dose IV on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days at cycle 1 and 4 only. Patients were assessed for response after every cycle. Subjects who had a response continued on therapy for a total of 6 cycles, and then continued on to maintenance therapy with everolimus alone until progression (or for a maximum of 24 months). Because of the potential of an IgM flare after rituximab, patients who showed an increase in IgM after rituximab in the first 3 months were not deemed as having progressive disease unless they showed evidence of clinical progression. To examine the in vivo effect of everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab, peripheral blood samples were obtained from patients on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 at cycle 1; and on day 1 only at all subsequent cycles. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this phase I clinical trial from April 2009 to July 2011. The median age is 61 (range, 52–73) yrs and the median lines of prior therapy is 2 (range, 1–8) with all patients receiving prior rituximab and 12 (52%) receiving prior bortezomib. The median number of cycles on therapy was 3.5 (range, 0–15). Overall, this combination therapy is very well tolerated. Grade 4 toxicities included: neutropenia (8.7%), leukopenia (4.3%), thrombocytopenia (17.4%), lymphopenia (4.3%) and hypertriglyceridemia (4.3%). Grade 3 toxicities included: neutropenia (21.7%), leukopenia (26.1%), anemia (13%), lymphopenia (17.4%), pneumonitis (4.3%), SGPT (4.3%), neuropathy (4.3%), Herpes zoster reactivation (4.3%), hyperglycemia (4.3%) and hypernatremia (4.3%). 1 patient discontinued therapy due to grade 3 anemia. Nineteen patients are currently evaluable for response, including 1 (5%) very good partial response (VGPR) and 9 (47%) minimal response (MR), for an overall response rate including MR of 10/19 (53%) in this relapsed/refractory population. Furthermore, overall response including MR in stage A (everolimus/rituximab) was 2/6 (33%) and 8/13 (62%) in stage B (everolimus/bortezomib/rituximab). Additionally, 9 (39%) patients achieved stable disease, and 4 (17%) are early on therapy and not been yet assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of everolimus, bortezomib, and rituximab is generally well tolerated, and importantly no grade 3/4 neuropathy was seen. Moreover, no dose limiting toxicities were observed even at the maximum dose evaluated. The responses observed to date in this relapsed/refractory population are encouraging. Based on the safety of this phase I study, the phase II study of two arms, everolimus/rituximab for low risk patients and everolimus/bortezomib/rituximab for intermediate and high risk patients is underway. Disclosures: Ghobrial: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Noxxon: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bortezomib and everolimus in WM. Anderson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Treon:Millennium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide and Rituximab for Untreated Indolent Lymphoma: Final Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.901.901 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 901-901 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Nathan H Fowler ◽

Sattva S. Neelapu ◽

Fredrick B Hagemeister ◽

Peter McLaughlin ◽

Larry W. Kwak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Data Monitoring Committee ◽

Study Entry ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Advanced Stage ◽

Indolent Lymphoma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 901 Background: The optimal management of patients (pts) with untreated, advanced stage indolent non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) is evolving. Although several traditional chemo-immunotherapy regimens achieve high overall response (OR) rates, toxicity is common and nearly all patients relapse. Lenalidomide has single-agent activity in relapsed indolent NHL, and rituximab is effective alone and in combination with chemotherapy in untreated pts. Preclinical studies suggest that lenalidomide may augment immune effector cell function and ADCC in the presence of rituximab. The aim of this phase II, single arm study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with untreated, advanced stage, indolent NHL. Methods: Pts with advanced stage untreated indolent NHL and measurable disease (>1.5cm) were eligible for study entry. Pts received 20 mg/day of lenalidomide on days 1–21 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28 day cycle for 6 cycles. Patients with evidence of tumor response could continue up to 12 cycles. To reduce the incidence of tumor flare, pts with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) started at 10mg, with monthly dose escalation. Pts were evaluable for response if they had at least 1 response assessment. Prophylactic growth factors were not used. Response was assessed every 3 cycles using the 1999 International Working Group Response Criteria. Results: The study enrolled 110 pts; all have completed treatment or are off-study, and 103 pts are evaluable for response. Histologies included: SLL n=30, follicular lymphoma (FL) n=50, and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=30. The median age was 58 (34-84) years, and 53% were male. Of the 46 evaluable pts with FL,78% had a FLIPI score of ≥ 2, and 52% met GELF criteria for high tumor burden. The best response for the 103 evaluable pts is listed in Table 1. Among the FL pts, responses were high regardless of FLIPI score, tumor bulk, or GELF criteria at study entry. At the completion of therapy nearly all FL pts demonstrated molecular response with the absence of detectable BCL-2 by PCR. Forty five evaluable pts with FL had a positive PET scan prior to therapy and 42 (93%) attained a complete metabolic response following treatment. At a median follow up of 22 months, the estimated 2 year progression free survival (PFS) is 83% for all pts and 89% in pts with FL. Among all pts, grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 40% (13% of total cycles) and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4% of pts. The most common grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities included rash (8 pts), muscle pain (7 pts), fatigue (3 pts), thrombosis (3 pts). Two episodes of neutropenic fever occurred. Six pts stopped treatment due to adverse events. Conclusion: The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is active and tolerable in pts with untreated indolent lymphoma. High complete response rates with durable remissions were observed in patients with follicular lymphoma. Randomized studies comparing this regimen versus traditional combination chemotherapy regimens are underway. Disclosures: Fowler: Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Off Label Use: lenalidomide. Neelapu:Celgene: Research Funding. McLaughlin:Celgene: Data Monitoring Committee for another study Other. Fanale:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclic: Research Funding. Lacerte:Celgene: Honoraria. Samaniego:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study Update of the Novel Pan-Pim Kinase Inhibitor LGH447 in Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.301.301 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 301-301 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Marc S Raab ◽

Enrique M Ocio ◽

Sheeba K. Thomas ◽

Andreas Günther ◽

Yeow-Tee Goh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Once Daily ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Background: LGH447 is a novel, specific pan-Pim kinase inhibitor in development for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and other hematologic malignancies. The PIM (Provirus Integration site for Moloney leukemia) kinase gene family encodes 3 serine/threonine protein kinases that have roles in cell cycle progression and survival. In human disease, elevated levels of Pim1 and Pim2 are associated with hematologic malignancies, with MM showing the highest level of Pim2 expression. In preclinical studies, a majority of MM cell lines proved sensitive in vitro to LGH447-mediated Pim inhibition, exhibiting a dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation. LGH447 demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition in xenograft mouse models of MM as compared with control animals, supporting the clinical development of LGH447 in MM patients. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MM for whom no effective treatment options exist were enrolled on this first-in-human, multicenter, open-label phase 1 dose-escalation study (CLGH447X2101). Escalating doses of single-agent LGH447 were administered orally on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or death. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of LGH447 administered as a single agent, orally, once daily. Secondary objectives included assessing the safety, tolerability, preliminary anti-myeloma activity, and pharmacokinetics of LGH447. Dose escalation followed a Bayesian logistic regression model based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Efficacy assessments were made by investigators according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria with modifications. Results:At the data cutoff, 54 patients have been treated at the following doses: 70 mg (n = 5), 150 mg (n = 6), 200 mg (n = 6), 250 mg (n = 7), 300 mg (n = 4), 350 mg (n=10), 500 mg (n=10), 700 mg (n=6), with the MTD determined to be 500 mg once daily. Median age was 65 years (range, 41-87 years). Most patients (92.6%) presented with baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-16). 81.5% had received prior proteasome inhibitor therapy, 83.3% had received prior immunomodulatory therapy (70.4% lenalidomide and 48.1% thalidomide), 68.5% were treated with both proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory therapies, and 87.0% had received prior stem cell transplant. Seventeen patients are ongoing at doses between 250-700 mg, with a median duration of exposure of 10.6 weeks (range, 0.1-56.1 weeks), and 37 patients discontinued (disease progression [n = 29], AEs [n = 4], withdrawal of consent [n = 4]). There were 8 DLTs, consisting of four grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (1 each at 200, 250, 350, 500 mg dose levels), two grade 3 fatigue (1 each at 500 and 700 mg dose levels), one grade 3 hypophosphatemia (300 mg), and one episode of vaso-vagal syncope (700 mg). This last event was the only reported unexpected serious AE that was suspected to be due to LGH447 treatment. The majority of AEs regardless of study drug relationship were grade 1/2. Most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (18.5%), anemia (18.5%), neutropenia (13%), and fatigue (11.1%). No deaths have occurred on study. Forty-eight individuals (70-500 mg) were evaluable for disease response assessments. Evidence of single agent activity was noted at doses ≥ 150 mg, including 1 VGPR at 200 mg (exposure duration > 55 weeks) and 4 PRs noted at doses ranging from 150-500 mg (respective exposure durations of 32, 29, 24, and 21 weeks). Five additional patients achieved MR, resulting in a clinical benefit rate (≥ MR) of 20.8%, and 23 patients were noted to have SD, resulting in a remarkable disease control rate (≥ SD) of 68.8%. In addition, of those patients with SD, 8 had exposure durations for > 20 weeks. Conclusions:In heavily treated patients with relapsed/refractory MM, LGH447 was generally well tolerated and exhibited evidence of durable single-agent efficacy in multiple patients, with the best response being a VGPR. These findings validate Pim kinase inhibition as a promising therapeutic rationale in MM patients and support further clinical development in patients. Disclosures Ocio: Novartis: Honoraria. Thomas:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding. Günther:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Goh:Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lebovic:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy. Jakubowiak:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkylineDx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Song:Novartis: Employment. Xiang:Novartis: Employment. Patel:Novartis: Employment. Vanasse:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Trial of SGN-CD33A As Monotherapy in Patients with CD33-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.324.324 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 324-324 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

Anthony S. Stein ◽

Roland B. Walter ◽

Harry P Erba ◽

Amir T. Fathi ◽

Anjali S. Advani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Intensive Therapy ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

Rapid Clearance ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Background CD33is expressed in approximately 90% of AML, representing a promising target despite age, prior therapies, or mutational heterogeneity. SGN-CD33A (or 33A) is a CD33-directed antibody conjugated to 2 molecules of a pyrrolobenzodiazepine (PBD) dimer. Upon binding, 33A is internalized and transported to the lysosomes where PBD dimer is released via proteolytic cleavage of the linker, crosslinking DNA, and leading to cell death. Methods The dose-escalation portion of this phase 1 study (NCT01902329) is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antileukemic activity of 33A as monotherapy. Eligible patients (ECOG 0-1) must have CD33-positive AML, and have either relapsed disease following initial remission (CR) of >3 months, or have declined conventional induction/consolidation. 33A monotherapy is administered outpatient via IV every 3 weeks for up to 2 cycles, followed by optional low-dose maintenance treatment for patients who achieve a CR/CRi. Investigator assessment of response is per IWG criteria; CRi requires either platelet count of ≥100,000/µL or neutrophils of ≥1,000/µL (Cheson 2003). Results To date, 87 patients (62% male) with a median age of 74 years (range, 27-89) have been treated. 34 patients had relapsed AML after 1st CR with intensive therapy; 52 had declined conventional intensive therapy (40 of these patients had received 1-2 prior low intensity therapies, primarily hypomethylating agents). Most patients had intermediate I-II (51%) or adverse (31%) risk by ELN classification and 54% of patients had AML with underlying myelodysplasia-related changes. 9% of patients displayed NPM1 mutations without FLT3 mutation (NPM1+/FLT3-). Dose levels ranged from 5-60 mcg/kg (n=75) and also included fractionated dosing of 20 mcg/kg on Day 1 and Day 4 (n=12). Five patients remain on treatment. Six dose-limiting toxicities were reported in the monotherapy escalation cohorts: 2 Grade 4 bone marrow failures (40 and 60 mcg/kg), 2 mucositis (Grade 3 at 50 mcg/kg; Grade 3 at fractionated 20+20 mcg/kg), Grade 3 pulmonary embolism (20 mcg/kg), and Grade 5 sepsis (50 mcg/kg). The most common Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AE) reported were febrile neutropenia (69%), thrombocytopenia (29%), and anemia (23%). Increased myelosuppression was observed at doses higher than 40 mcg/kg and the fractionated dosing cohort, including febrile neutropenia observed in 68% of patients and sepsis observed in 26% of patients. Other common treatment-emergent AEs regardless of relationship to study treatment were fatigue (48%), decreased appetite (28%), constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, nausea (26% each), and peripheral edema (25%). The 30-day mortality was 6%. Across all dose levels, the CR+CRi rate was 86% in the patients with NPM1+/FLT3- disease (n=7). Of the 21 efficacy evaluable patients treated at 40 mcg/kg, 3 patients achieved a best clinical response of CR, 4 achieved CRi, and 5 had morphologic leukemia-free state (mLFS). Three of 5 treatment-naïve patients within the 40 mcg/kg dose level achieved a CR or CRi. In patients across dose levels who achieved at least mLFS, the mean time to full count recovery was 5 weeks for neutrophils (≥1,000/µL) and 6 weeks for platelets (≥100,000/µL). Median OS in patients treated at 40 mcg/kg is 10 months with 17 patients alive at the time of this data cut. Across all dose levels, 8 patients went on to receive an allogeneic SCT. PK data demonstrated generally dose-dependent increase in plasma ADC exposures and target-mediated rapid clearance. Conclusions Dose escalation is complete and a recommended monotherapy 33A dose of 40 mcg/kg was identified. AEs observed were generally manageable, often associated with underlying myelosuppression. 33A has demonstrated favorable antileukemic activity with 33% achieving a CR+CRi at the 40 mcg/kg dose level (60% CR+CRi in treatment naïve patients). The rapid clearance of marrow blasts in patients with poor risk factors and low 30-day mortality (6%) are encouraging. Enrollment is ongoing in multiple expansion cohorts, including previously untreated AML patients who declined intensive therapy, relapsed NPM1 mutant disease, and relapsed APL. In addition, a study evaluating 33A with intensive therapy in newly diagnosed patients with AML is ongoing. Disclosures Stein: Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: SGN-CD33A is an investigational agent being studied in patients with CD33-positive AML. SGN-CD33A is not approved for use. Walter:Pfizer, Inc.: Consultancy; Covagen AG: Consultancy; AstraZeneca, Inc.: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc.: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Erba:GlycoMimetics; Janssen: Other: Data Safety & Monitoring Committees; Sunesis; Pfizer; Daiichi Sankyo; Ariad: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda; Celator; Astellas: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis; Incyte; Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties. Fathi:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board participation; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory Board participation, Research Funding; Merck: Other: Advisory Board participation. Lancet:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy; Kalo-Bios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kovacsovics:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. DeAngelo:Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Bixby:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Faderl:Onyx: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; JW Pharma: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Ambit: Research Funding. Jillella:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Meara:Seattle Genetics, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhao:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stein:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text