Lenalidomide and Rituximab for Untreated Indolent Lymphoma: Final Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 901-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan H Fowler ◽  
Sattva S. Neelapu ◽  
Fredrick B Hagemeister ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Larry W. Kwak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Data Monitoring Committee ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Indolent Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 901 Background: The optimal management of patients (pts) with untreated, advanced stage indolent non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) is evolving. Although several traditional chemo-immunotherapy regimens achieve high overall response (OR) rates, toxicity is common and nearly all patients relapse. Lenalidomide has single-agent activity in relapsed indolent NHL, and rituximab is effective alone and in combination with chemotherapy in untreated pts. Preclinical studies suggest that lenalidomide may augment immune effector cell function and ADCC in the presence of rituximab. The aim of this phase II, single arm study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with untreated, advanced stage, indolent NHL. Methods: Pts with advanced stage untreated indolent NHL and measurable disease (>1.5cm) were eligible for study entry. Pts received 20 mg/day of lenalidomide on days 1–21 and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28 day cycle for 6 cycles. Patients with evidence of tumor response could continue up to 12 cycles. To reduce the incidence of tumor flare, pts with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) started at 10mg, with monthly dose escalation. Pts were evaluable for response if they had at least 1 response assessment. Prophylactic growth factors were not used. Response was assessed every 3 cycles using the 1999 International Working Group Response Criteria. Results: The study enrolled 110 pts; all have completed treatment or are off-study, and 103 pts are evaluable for response. Histologies included: SLL n=30, follicular lymphoma (FL) n=50, and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=30. The median age was 58 (34-84) years, and 53% were male. Of the 46 evaluable pts with FL,78% had a FLIPI score of ≥ 2, and 52% met GELF criteria for high tumor burden. The best response for the 103 evaluable pts is listed in Table 1. Among the FL pts, responses were high regardless of FLIPI score, tumor bulk, or GELF criteria at study entry. At the completion of therapy nearly all FL pts demonstrated molecular response with the absence of detectable BCL-2 by PCR. Forty five evaluable pts with FL had a positive PET scan prior to therapy and 42 (93%) attained a complete metabolic response following treatment. At a median follow up of 22 months, the estimated 2 year progression free survival (PFS) is 83% for all pts and 89% in pts with FL. Among all pts, grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 40% (13% of total cycles) and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4% of pts. The most common grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic toxicities included rash (8 pts), muscle pain (7 pts), fatigue (3 pts), thrombosis (3 pts). Two episodes of neutropenic fever occurred. Six pts stopped treatment due to adverse events. Conclusion: The combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is active and tolerable in pts with untreated indolent lymphoma. High complete response rates with durable remissions were observed in patients with follicular lymphoma. Randomized studies comparing this regimen versus traditional combination chemotherapy regimens are underway. Disclosures: Fowler: Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Off Label Use: lenalidomide. Neelapu:Celgene: Research Funding. McLaughlin:Celgene: Data Monitoring Committee for another study Other. Fanale:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclic: Research Funding. Lacerte:Celgene: Honoraria. Samaniego:Celgene: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase II Study of Venetoclax in Combination with Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine in Patients with High Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma As Front Line Therapy (PrECOG 0403)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 814-814
Author(s):  
Craig A. Portell ◽  
Opeyemi Jegede ◽  
Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽  
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski ◽  
Christopher D. Fletcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Type I ◽  
High Tumor Burden ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Chemoimmunotherapy is considered standard initial therapy for follicular lymphoma (FL) with high tumor burden (HTB). Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine (OB) with maintenance Obinutuzumab (mO) is considered a standard therapy for the frontline treatment of HTB FL (GALLIUM, Marcus et al, NEJM 2017). Venetoclax (VEN), an oral BCL2 inhibitor, is an attractive target in FL given the high BCL2 expression; though single agent activity has been disappointing (Davids et al. JCO 2017). BCL2 inhibition is thought to be synergistic with chemotherapy. Thus, the PrE0403 study evaluated the OB-VEN combination in frontline HTB FL. Here we present end of induction (EOI) outcomes. Methods: The primary objective of this Phase II study was to estimate the complete remission (CR) rate at EOI. Potential participants must have had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of FL grade 1, 2, or 3a with HTB defined by GELF or high risk defined by FLIPI-1 criteria. They must have had adequate performance status and organ function. Notably, creatinine clearance must have been ≥50 mL/min. Participants must have not had prior treatment for FL. Eligible participants were treated with Bendamustine IV 90 mg/m2 Day (D) 1 & 2, Obinutuzumab IV 100 mg D1, 900 mg D2, 1000 mg D8 and D15 of Cycle (C) 1 then D1 of each cycle, and VEN 800 mg orally daily D1-10 every 28 days for 6 total cycles. Due to a high rate of laboratory tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) during C1 in the first 21 patients, VEN was removed from C1 and given in C2-6 only. Participants with a CR at EOI were treated with mO IV 1000 mg D1 every 8 weeks for 2 years. Those with a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) were treated with mO as well as VEN 800 mg orally daily for 2 years. Pneumocystis jiroveci Pneumonia (PJP) and antiviral prophylaxis was required as was G-CSF support. Response was assessed via Lugano Criteria at EOI including PET/CT and bone marrow assessment. Adverse Events (AEs) were evaluated using CTCAE v5.0. To be considered promising, OB-VEN should improve the null hypothesis CR rate of 50% (OB) to 65%. With an 85% power and a one sided 15% type I error, 56 participants would be needed with an estimated 51 eligible. Support for the study was from Genentech, Member of the Roche Group. Results A total of 56 participants were enrolled and treated between 12/2017 and 11/2020; baseline characteristics are listed in Table 1. TLS was closely monitored in C1 and 8/21 participants developed TLS when VEN was administered in C1; 0/35 when it was not. However, monitoring for TLS in C1 became less stringent when VEN was not administered. Treatment related Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 47/56 participants (83.9%) with serious adverse events in 31 of 56 (55.5%). Atypical infections were seen; there was one treatment related death on study due to cytomegalovirus (CMV) encephalitis as well as PJP pneumonia which occurred after induction C6. Enrollment was temporarily suspended and CMV monitoring was implemented with no further occurrences. Another participant receiving mO later developed BK virus nephropathy following mO C6 and now requires ongoing hemodialysis. Another was diagnosed with Respiratory Syncytial Virus pneumonia 30 days after C6 and later PJP pneumonia after C2 of mO. Common (incidence >10%) AEs during induction are listed in Table 2. 45 of 56 (80.4%) participants were able to receive all 6 cycles of OB-VEN. CR was seen in 41 of 56 participants (73.2%, 2 sided 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 59.7-84.2%) at the EOI. 30 participants (53.5%) went onto maintenance. With a median follow up of 20.9 months, estimated 2 year Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (90% CI) is 94.4% (82.4-98.3%) and 85.8% (68.8-93.9%) respectively. Conclusions This Phase II study of OB-VEN in untreated HTB FL showed high CR rate and met its primary endpoint with early signs of prolonged PFS. Laboratory TLS was identified but it was unclear if attributed solely to VEN, as baseline laboratory TLS rate for OB is unknown. The rate of Grade ≥3 AE of 83.9% (compared to 69% for OB in GALLIUM, Hiddeman JCO 2018) and the observation of opportunistic infections including CMV encephalitis, PJP pneumonia and BK nephropathy, suggests the combination is highly immunosuppressive. Therefore, while the study met its primary outcome, the combination of OB-VEN at 800 mg for 10 days, plus mO, does not have an acceptable risk/benefit profile. Participants will continue to be followed for efficacy and safety during the maintenance phase. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Portell: Acerta/AstraZeneca: Research Funding; SeaGen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Xencor: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Morphosys: Honoraria; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding. Nowakowski: MorphoSys: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Nanostrings: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Zai Labolatory: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bantham Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Selvita: Consultancy; Ryvu Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kyte Pharma: Consultancy. Cohen: Janssen, Adicet, Astra Zeneca, Genentech, Aptitude Health, Cellectar, Kite/Gilead, Loxo, BeiGene, Adaptive: Consultancy; Genentech, BMS/Celgene, LAM, BioINvent, LOXO, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, M2Gen, Takeda: Research Funding. Kahl: AbbVie, Acerta, ADCT, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie, Adaptive, ADCT, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kite, MEI, Pharmacyclics, Roche, TG Therapeutics, and Teva: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax is not approved for follicular lymphoma or in combination with bendamustine and obinutuzumab

Phase II Trial of Ofatumumab (OFA) in Previously Untreated Follicular Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL): CALGB 50901 (Alliance)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2741-2741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara A. Rosenbaum ◽  
Brandelyn Pitcher ◽  
Nancy L Bartlett ◽  
Sonali M. Smith ◽  
Jane Jijun Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Background: Rituximab has proven safety and efficacy in untreated patients with advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) with response rates upward of 67% (Ghielmini et al., Blood 2004). OFA is a fully humanized anti-CD20 mAb with higher CD20 antigen affinity and increased complement dependent cytotoxicity compared to rituximab. OFA has demonstrated activity in relapsed/refractory FL and high risk untreated FL in combination with chemotherapy. We therefore investigated OFA monotherapy as initial treatment for low/intermediate (int) risk, advanced stage FL in order to determine single agent efficacy as a platform for future studies. Methods: We conducted a randomized, multicenter phase II study in which previously untreated CD20+, grade (gr) 1- 3a FL patients (pts) and low/int FLIPI scores in stages III, IV or bulky stage II were randomized to either 500 mg (n=15) or 1000 mg (n=36) OFA dose. Induction consisted of 4 weekly doses followed by an extended induction schedule every 8 weeks for 4 additional doses. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) with an ORR of 60% or lower considered inadequate, and 80% or higher of strong interest. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Premedication included acetaminophen and antihistamine (all infusions) and glucocorticoid (infusions 1 and 2 and extended induction infusions 5-8). Pts with gr 3/4 infusion reactions during weeks 1 and 2 also received glucocorticoid during weeks 3 and 4. Due to slower than anticipated accrual, the 500 mg arm was stopped in Oct 2013 in order to meet the primary endpoint in at least one dosing arm; pts enrolled on 500 mg prior to that date continued treatment at that dose. Results: Fifty-one pts were accrued. The median age was 60 years (range 40-85). 86.3% were Caucasian; 54.9% were male. The majority had FL gr 1 (45.1%) or gr 2 (41.2%) and Stage III-IVA (84.3%). Five pts had B-symptoms. The majority of pts were int risk (72.5% FLIPI 2; 70.6% FLIPI2 1-2) or low risk (21.6% FLIPI 0-1; 19.6% FLIPI2 0). Of 36 pts allocated to the 1000 mg arm, 32 were evaluable for response. Four pts are excluded from response analysis: ineligible (n=3) and insufficient data (n=1). Two additional pts had no response assessment as therapy was stopped after the first dose; one withdrew consent and the other received alternative therapy per treating physician. The best response was CR (13.3%), PR (73.3%) and SD (10%). One pt progressed on treatment. The ORR of evaluable pts with evaluable defined as having at least one response assessed was 86.7% [95% CI (69.3%-96.2%)]. The ITT response rate was 81.3% [95% CI (63.6%- 92.8%)]. With a median (med) follow-up of 15.6 months (mo) (< 1 mo - 39.6 mo), the 1 year PFS in the 1000 mg arm is 96.6% [95% CI (77.9%, 99.5%)]; 12/33 (36.6%) pts progressed. Of 15 pts allocated to the 500 mg arm, the ORR was 60% [95% CI (32.2%-83.7%)]. The best response was CR (13.3%), PR (46.7%) and SD (40%). One pt progressed on treatment. The 1 year PFS is 85.1% [95% CI (52.3%, 96.1%)]; 9/15 (60%) pts progressed. All pts remain alive. Hematologic adverse events (AEs) in the 1000 mg arm included 1 pt with gr 3 neutropenia; no gr 4 hematologic AEs were reported. There were no gr 3/4 infections. Gr 3 infusion-related events occurred in 9/36 (25%) evaluable pts and all occurred with 1st infusion; there were no gr 4 infusion-related events. Steroid-induced AEs included gr 3 hypertension in 3 pts and gr 3 hyperglycemia in 4 pts. Nine additional gr 3 events occurred (2 fatigue, 2, dyspnea, 1, syncope, 1 GI obstruction, 1 hyponatremia, 1 hypokalemia, 1 hyperkalemia). A single gr 4 AE was reported; ARDS with acute coronary syndrome occurring after the 2nd infusion. The pt withdrew and made a full recovery. Conclusions: OFA when given as a single agent in an extended induction dosing schedule is well tolerated and active as front line therapy in patients with low/int risk FLIPI, advanced stage FL in this multicenter study. Activity appears to be in a range comparable to that reported with other anti-CD20 antibodies in this setting, suggesting that significant improvements in efficacy will require novel combinations. NCT01190449. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882 Disclosures Rosenbaum: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an anti CD20 monoclonal antibody not approved for use in follicular lymphoma.. Bartlett:Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Colgene: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Insight: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; MERC: Research Funding; Dynavax: Research Funding; Idera: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; LAM Theapeutics: Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Hsi:Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Cellerant Therapeutics: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Leonard:Weill Cornell Medical College: Employment; Genentech: Consultancy; Medimmune: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Vertex: Consultancy; ProNAI: Consultancy; Biotest: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Mirati Therapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Cheson:Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Ascenta: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy.

Tolerability and Efficacy of Bortezomib Added to CVP-R for Previously Untreated Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma: Interim Analysis of a Phase II Study by the NCIC Clinical Trials Group.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1576-1576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie H Sehn ◽  
David A Macdonald ◽  
Sheldon H. Rubin ◽  
Morel Rubinger ◽  
Kevin R Imrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Acceptable Level ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Despite recent improvements in therapy, follicular lymphoma (FL) remains incurable with standard treatment, warranting investigation of new approaches. Bortezomib, the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor has demonstrated promising efficacy as a single agent in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with FL. This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of bortezomib to cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab (CVP-R). Methods: This is a phase II multi-center open-label trial adding bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 day 1&8) to standard dose C(750 mg/m2) V(1.4 mg/m2, capped at 2 mg) P(40 mg/m2 × 5) –R(375 mg/m2) for up to 8 cycles in pts with newly diagnosed stage III/IV FL requiring therapy. Planned accrual is 90 patients. A two-stage design was employed with a planned interim analysis of the first 28 patients to ensure an acceptable level of neurotoxicity (defined as less than 5/28 patients with grade 3/4 neurotoxicity after the first 4 cycles) and meaningful response rate (more than 12/28 patients with a complete response following 8 cycles), prior to enrolling remaining patients. Results: Median age of the first 28 patients was 55 years (range, 30–73). Fifty percent were male and 79% had stage IV disease. FLIPI score at study entry: low 14%, intermediate 43%, high 43%. Overall, the combination of bortezomib and CVP-R was extremely well tolerated. To date, no pts have developed grade 4 neurotoxicity and only 1/28 (4%) has developed grade 3 neurotoxicity within the first 4 cycles (neuropathic pain which resolved without need for treatment modification). The incidence of grade 1 and 2 neurotoxicity was 54% and 25% respectively. Only 3 pts discontinued therapy prematurely (2 pt refusal, 1 progressive disease). Ninety-four percent of planned bortezomib treatments in the first four cycles and 93% of vincristine doses were administered without dose reduction. Hematologic toxicity was mild, with no pts experiencing grade 3/4 anemia or thrombocytopenia. Only 2 episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred and no grade 3/4 infections were noted. Although it is too early to report on efficacy in this ongoing trial, response objectives for stage I have been met, and enrollment to stage 2 is underway. Conclusions: The addition of bortezomib to standard dose CVP-R is very well tolerated, with an acceptable level of neurotoxicity, without compromising the delivery of bortezomib or vincristine. This ongoing study will provide toxicity and efficacy data to facilitate the development of a planned phase III trial.

Bortezomib Added to CVP-R Is Safe and Effective for Previously Untreated Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma: A Phase II Study by the NCIC Clinical Trials Group.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 407-407
Author(s):  
Laurie H. Sehn ◽  
David A Macdonald ◽  
Sheldon H. Rubin ◽  
Guy Cantin ◽  
Morel Rubinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Experienced Grade

Abstract Abstract 407 Background: Bortezomib, the first-in-class proteasome inhibitor has demonstrated promising efficacy as a single agent in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with follicular lymphoma (FL). This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the addition of bortezomib to cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab (CVP-R), one of the most commonly used regimens in untreated patients. Methods: This is a phase II multi-centre open-label trial adding bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 day 1&8) to standard dose cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2), vincristine (1.4 mg/m2, capped at 2 mg), prednisone (40 mg/m2 × 5) and rituximab (375 mg/m2) for up to 8 cycles in pts with newly diagnosed stage III/IV FL requiring therapy. Response was assessed following 4 and 8 cycles. The two co-primary endpoints were complete response rate (CR/CRu) and incidence of grade 3/4 neurotoxicity. Following the final response assessment, patients were permitted to receive maintenance rituximab at the discretion of the treating physician according to local practice. Results: Between March 2007 and February 2009, 95 patients were enrolled. Median age was 56.6 years (range 29.5 – 83.6 years). 48% percent were male and 63% had stage IV disease. FLIPI score at study entry: low 11%, intermediate 43%, high 46%. Safety data was availabel on all patients. Overall, the combination of bortezomib and CVP-R was extremely well tolerated. No pts have developed grade 4 neurotoxicity and only 6/95 (6.3%) have developed grade 3 neurotoxicity (five sensory neuropathy and one neuropathic pain). The incidence of grade I and II neuropathy was 65.3% and 36.8% respectively. Neurotoxicity was largely reversible. Five pts discontinued therapy prematurely (three refused further treatment, one pt was found to have Hodgkin lymphoma as well as FL and one pt was removed from study for non-compliance). 84% of planned bortezomib treatments and 85% of vincristine treatments were administered without dose reduction. Five pts experienced grade 3/4 anemia and 3 pts experienced grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Only 4 episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred and 2 grade 3 infections were noted. No grade 4 infections were reported. No serious adverse events were reported. One patient died due to progressive disease. At present, 78/95 patients are evaluable for response. 37/78 (47%) achieved a CR/CRu (95% CI 36.4, 58.5), and 29/78 (37%) achieved a PR with an ORR of 84.6% (95% CI 76.6, 96.6). An additional 5/78 pts had stable disease, while 7/78 progressed on therapy. Complete efficacy data as well as information on quality of life will be availabel within the next few months. Forty-one of 70 pts (58.6%) with availabel follow-up information went on to receive maintenance rituximab. Conclusions: The addition of bortezomib to standard dose CVP-R is feasible and well tolerated with minimal associated toxicity. Neurotoxicity is primarily low grade and reversible and does not limit delivery of either bortezomib or vincristine. The complete remission rate in this high risk population compares favorably to historical results of patients receiving CVP-R. Based on these encouraging results, a phase III trial of CVP-R with or without bortezomib is currently being planned. Disclosures: Sehn: Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Velcade for is not yet approved for follicular lymphoma. Chen:Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Research Funding. Djurfeldt:Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Research Funding. Shepherd:Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Research Funding. Crump:Johnson and Johnson Ortho Biotec: Honoraria.

Combination Biologic Therapy as Initial Treatment for Follicular Lymphoma: Initial Results From CALGB 50701 - a Phase II Trial of Extended Induction Epratuzumab (anti-CD22) and Rituximab (anti-CD20)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 427-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Grant ◽  
John P. Leonard ◽  
Jeffrey L Johnson ◽  
Lale Kostakoglu ◽  
Eric Hsi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Good Tolerability ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Abstract 427 Rituximab is effective as single agent therapy in the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL), and when combined with chemotherapy has extended remissions and survival. Epratuzumab (Immunomedics), a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody, also has single agent activity in FL, and in combination with rituximab led to durable complete responses in the treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory indolent NHL. To evaluate the hypothesis that combining a second biological agent with rituximab might improve efficacy with good tolerability, the CALGB treated 60 previously untreated pts with epratuzumab and rituximab in a multicenter phase II trial and we report here the preliminary response and toxicity findings. Rituximab was administered at 375 mg/m2 iv weekly for four weeks, then every 8 weeks for four additional doses for a total of 8 doses over 9 months. Epratuzumab, was given at 360 mg/m2 two days before the first rituximab dose to assess toxicity. From week 2 on, epratuzumab was given before the rituximab on the same day for a total of 8 doses over 9 months. Fifty-seven evaluable pts were enrolled between May 2008 and September 2009. FLIPI scores at study entry were 13 (22%) low; 28 (47.5%) intermediate; and 18 (30.5%) high. Fifty-three pts completed all therapy through month 9. One pt was taken off therapy due to progression after month 5. One pt died during induction from line sepsis. Two pts were taken off study due to adverse events, 1 during induction (grade 4 thrombosis and MI), 1 following month 5 (dyspnea, hypoxia and pulmonary NOS). All other toxicities were grade 3 or lower, including fatigue (grade 3 3%, grade 2 17%), nodal pain (grade 3 5%, grade 2 8%), and cytokine release and pruritis (grade 2, 5% each). To date, there have been 19 CRs (33.3%), 29 PRs (50.9%)(ORR 84.2%); 9 (15.8%) had stable disease. All 19 CR patients completed all treatment. The mean time to CR was 9 months. Two patients progressed after a period of stable disease, and 25 of the 29 patients who achieved PR remain in response. All 19 CRs also remain in remission at this point with a median follow-up of 0.82 years (range 0.52 to 2.0). FLIPI score was not predictive of response. The CR rate in low risk pts was 31%, 44% in intermediate risk and 18% in high risk pts. There was a trend toward higher CR rate among patients with FcgR2A His (n=10, CR 60%) and to a lower CR rate among those with FcgR2A Arg (n=14, CR 14.3%). Correlations with PET scan at week 3, with tissue biomarkers and to statin use are being analyzed. Rituximab and epratuzumab is an effective and very well tolerated regimen with an ORR of 84% in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Use of Epratuzumab, a humanized antiCD22 monoclonal antibody in treatment of follicular lymphoma. Leonard:BiogenIDEC: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Immunomedics: Consultancy. Jones:Glaxo Smith-Kline: Consultancy; Abbott: Research Funding. Cheson:Genentech: Consultancy.

Bortezomib Added to R-CVP Is Safe and Effective for Previously Untreated Advanced-Stage Follicular Lymphoma: A Phase II Study by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (25) ◽  
pp. 3396-3401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie H. Sehn ◽  
David MacDonald ◽  
Sheldon Rubin ◽  
Guy Cantin ◽  
Morel Rubinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Bortezomib has demonstrated promising activity in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib added to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP) in previously untreated advanced-stage FL. Patients and Methods This is a phase II multicenter trial adding bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) to standard-dose R-CVP (BR-CVP) for up to eight cycles in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV FL requiring therapy. Two co-primary end points, complete response rate (complete response [CR]/CR unconfirmed [CRu]) and incidence of grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity, were assessed. Results Between December 2006 and March 2009, 94 patients were treated with BR-CVP. Median patient age was 57 years (range, 29 to 84 years), and the majority had a high (47%) or intermediate (43%) Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score. BR-CVP was extremely well tolerated, with 90% of patients completing the intended eight cycles. No patients developed grade 4 neurotoxicity, and only five of 94 patients (5%; 95% CI, 0.8% to 9.9%) developed grade 3 neurotoxicity, which was largely reversible. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis, 46 of 94 patients (49%; 95% CI, 38.8% to 59.0%) achieved a CR/CRu, and 32 of 94 patients (34%) achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 83% (95% CI, 75.4% to 90.6%). Conclusion The addition of bortezomib to standard-dose R-CVP for advanced-stage FL is feasible and well tolerated with minimal additional toxicity. The complete response rate in this high-risk population compares favorably to historical results of patients receiving R-CVP. Given these results, a phase III trial comparing BR-CVP with R-CVP is planned.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Combined Ruxolitinib and Thalidomide in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Initial Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 354-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raajit K. Rampal ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Sean M Devlin ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Tapan M. Kadia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Platelet Response ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Among the most frequent and challenging hematologic manifestations of myelofibrosis (MF) are anemia and thrombocytopenia, the presence of which portends an adverse outcome. Few effective modalities to address these cytopenias exist, particularly thrombocytopenia. Further, although the FDA-approved JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib (RUX) has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in MF patients, RUX frequently results in anemia and thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia in particular often results in dose attenuation of RUX. Thalidomide (THAL) is a first-in-class immunomodulatory agent. Studies of THAL in MF patients, alone and with prednisone, have demonstrated improvements in anemia and thrombocytopenia. We therefore sought to examine whether combination of RUX and THAL could result in improvement in both disease-related and therapy-related cytopenias, as well as improve overall disease response in patients with MF. Here we report initial analysis of this study (NCT03069326). Methods: We conducted a multicenter two stage phase II trial designed to assess the effect of RUX and THAL combination in subjects with primary, post-polycythemia vera, or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Patients taking RUX at the time of enrollment must have had less than PR per IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria, or be refractory, to RUX single-agent therapy. Patients must have been taking RUX for a minimum of 3 months, and must have been on a stable dose of RUX for a minimum of 4 weeks immediately prior to enrollment. Treatment-naïve patients received single-agent RUX for 3 months (run-in phase) per label, and went on to combination therapy if they achieved less then a PR per IWG-MRT/ELN criteria. Each cycle of therapy was 28 days. Response assessment was evaluated according to the IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria. Platelet response criteria in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia (less than lower limit of normal) included: Major response (≥75% increase in platelet count), Intermediate Response (≥50% increase) and Minor Response (≥25% increase). Adverse events were assessed using the NCI CTCAE v. 4.0. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treated subjects that achieved a response by IWG-MRT criteria and by platelet response criteria. Results: A total of 25 patients are planned to be accrued. At the time of this writing, a total of 18 patients have been accrued. The median age was 70.5 years (47-85). 8 patients had received prior therapies other than RUX, including imetelstat, momelotinib, danazol, pomalidomide, darbepoetin alpha and sotatercept. 7 patients enrolled to the run-in phase. 14 patients received red blood cell transfusions prior to study enrollment. Evaluation of platelet count in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia demonstrated a significant increase in platelet count at cycle 3 of therapy compared to baseline (Figure 1A and B; P<0.05). An increase in Hgb was observed over successive cycles of combination therapy (Figure 1C and D). 5 of 18 accrued patients completed ≥6 cycles of combined therapy at the time of abstract submission and were thus evaluable for response assessment. The overall response rate in these patients was 80% (4/5 patients). Clinical Improvement (Anemia response and Symptom response) occurred in 3 patients (both responses observed in all 3 patients). Major platelet response was observed in 4 of 5 patients with baseline thrombocytopenia. 1 patient met criteria for spleen response (Table 1). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events regardless of attribution included; limb edema, diverticulitis, hypertension, syncope. 1 patient experienced a thromboembolic event. 1 patient experienced a grade 3 hematologic AE (neutropenia). Conclusions: The combination of THAL and RUX has demonstrated a promising efficacy signal in this initial analysis of an ongoing phase II study, and appears to be well tolerated. Platelet count increases were observed in all patients who entered study with baseline thrombocytopenia, a response which appears to be maintained in the majority of patients observed 6 months after starting combination therapy. As well, anemia responses were observed in 3 of 5 evaluable patients. Collectively, these data indicate a potential role for this regimen in patients with anemia and/or thrombocytopenia, who otherwise have limited treatment options. Updated data on duration of response and overall response of all accrued patients will be presented. Disclosures Rampal: Constellation: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stemline: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Stein:Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kadia:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mauro:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Pemmaraju:SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; plexxikon: Research Funding. Bose:Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Temsirolimus in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab for the Treatment of Relapsed Mantle Cell and Follicular Lymphoma: Report on an Ongoing Phase I/II Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3930-3930
Author(s):  
Georg Hess ◽  
Ulrich Keller ◽  
Johannes Atta ◽  
Ulrich Bitz ◽  
Christian Lerchenmueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Mtor Inhibition ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Abstract Background: mTOR inhibition has been shown to be effective in various subtypes of malignant lymphomas. In relapsed MCL a phase III trial could prove superiority of Temsirolimus to standard options. Furthermore, in patients with follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, promising response rates could be observed (Smith et al, JCO 2010). Whereas combination to single agent Rituximab (R) improved efficacy (Ansell et al, Lancet Oncology 2011), there is limited information of the feasibility and efficacy in combination with chemotherapy. Bendamustine (B) has been shown to be effective in various lymphoma entities and has a beneficial side effect profile (Rummel et al, JCO, 2005). In the phase I of this trial, we have established that 50mg of Temsirolimus given 3 times weekly in a four week cycle could be safely added to BR (Hess, Leukemia, 2015). Here we report for the first time combined results of phase I and II of this trial. Methods: this is a multicenter, national, prospective trial. Inclusion criteria: patients were eligible if they had histologically proven FL or MCL, 1-3 prior treatment lines, no curative option available, no refractoriness to Bendamustine, measurable disease, ECOG < 3, sufficient bone marrow reserve, no severe concomitant diseases and given informed consent. Treatment consisted of Bendamustine 90mg/m² day 1-2, Rituximab 375mg/m² day 1 and Temsirolimus 50 mg day 2, 8, 15 of a 28d cycle. A total of 4 cycles was planned with interim staging after 2 cycles. Results: Overall 34 patients (pts) have been included until now (15 pts phase I, 19 pts phase II). Concerning clinical characteristics, median age was 71 years, with 25 MCL and 9FL, and a median number of 2 pretreatments (1-3). Overall the treatment was well tolerated, and toxicity was predominantly hematologic. In 118 evaluable cycles of chemotherapy the following hematologic grade 3 / 4 toxicities were noted: leukopenia (11 pts, 32%), neutropenia (8 pts, 24%), and thrombocytopenia (7 pts, 21%). Non-hematologic grade 3 / 4 observed in at least two patients were angioedema and decrease in blood potassium, infection, metabolic (4 events). AE's of special interest: pulmonary: rate of cough (4; 12%) and pneumonitis (1; 3%); gastrointestinal: diarrhea (6; 18%), nausea (13, 38%); general: fatigue (16; 47%), mucositis (13, 38%); bleeding: epistaxis (4; 12%), which all were predominantly grade 1 or 2. Response: currently, best responses were 8 CR (31%), 16 PR (62%) and 2 SD (8%) in 26 patients evaluable so far. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Overall responses were 94% in MCL (7 CR, 10 PR, 1 SD) and 88% in FL (1 CR, 6 PR, 1 SD). After a median follow up of 13 months (mean: 21 months) median PFS is 18.6 months for the entire cohort, with 22 months for MCL and not reached in FL. Summary: In this ongoing phase II trial 50mg Temsirolimus (day 1,8,15) in combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab was well tolerated and feasible. A moderate dose of Temsirolimus to standard chemotherapy might be the optimal way to achieve the maximum efficacy with mTOR inhibitors; in fact excellent response rates suggest an additive effect of mTOR inhibition to BR. Even after the BTK inhibitor Ibrutinib has entered the clinical arena of MCL, this combined treatment represents a valuable additional option especially for patients with relapsed MCL Disclosures Hess: Pfizer, Janssen, Roche, Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen, Roche, , Celgene, Novartis: Consultancy. Keller:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Witzens-Harig:Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Results of a Phase II Trial of Dasatinib As Frontline Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) In Chronic Phase (CP)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1700-1700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Rajyalakshmi Luthra ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1700 Background: Dasatinib is approximately 300 times more potent than imatinib (IM) in vitro and has significant activity in patients (pts) with CML-CP resistant to or intolerant of IM. In 2005 we initiated a phase II trial to study the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in pts with previously untreated CML-CP. Objective: To determine the outcome of pts with CML-CP treated with front-line dasatinib. The primary endpoint was attainment of major molecular response (MMR) at 12 months (mos). Methods: Pts with previously untreated CML-CP within 6 mos from diagnosis were eligible and received dasatinib 100 mg/day, randomized to either 50 mg twice daily (BID) or 100 mg once daily (QD). After 66 pts were accrued, the BID arm was closed and all subsequent pts were treated with 100 mg QD. No prior therapy was allowed except for IM for no more than 1 month, or hydroxyurea. Results: From November 2005 to June 2011, 99 pts have been enrolled (66 on the QD schedule, 33 BID). For the purposes of this analysis, we considered all pts with clonal evolution at baseline (n=6) as accelerated phase and excluded them from the present analysis, therefore leaving 93 pts (62QD, 31 BID) for review. Median age was 48 years (yrs) (range 18–82); 56% were male. Median baseline counts: WBC 22.95 K/uL, PB blasts 0%, BM blasts 3%, BM basophils 2%, and platelets 315; 21 pts (23%) had brief prior exposure to IM. Sokal score by distribution: Low (81%), Intermediate (14%), High (5%). Median follow-up is 29 mos (3–67). Of the 80 evaluable pts who were not in CHR at the start of therapy, 79 (98%) achieved CHR. Of 87 evaluable pts (ie, followed for at least 3 mos), 83 (95%) achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). MMR has been achieved in 75 pts (86%), including 54 pts (67%) with complete molecular response (CMR; ≤0.0032% IS). At 6 mos, 79 (94%) pts had achieved a CCyR and 56 (68%) an MMR; corresponding figures at 12 mos are 95% and 73%, respectively. Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicity included fatigue (9%), pain and dyspnea (6% each), memory impairment (5%), headache and sensory neuropathy (4% each), nausea, cardiac arrhythmia, and neurologic (3% each) and diarrhea, visual, and pleural effusion (2% each). Grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity (transient) included thrombocytopenia 13%, neutropenia 24%, and anemia 9%. Fifty-two (56%) of 93 pts required transient treatment interruptions and 36 (39%) have required dose reductions. The actual median daily dose for all pts was 100 mg (20–140). Thirteen pts lost CCyR: (including 3 because of non-compliance and 2 transient losses, regained spontaneously). The 24-mo probability of event-free survival (EFS) is 93%.There have been no transformations or deaths on study. Twelve (13%) pts have discontinued therapy: 3 pt's choice, 1 lost to follow up, 4 toxicity (2 pleural effusion, 1 congestive heart failure, 1 headaches), and 4 for loss of major cytogenetic response (MCyR). Three pts have had mutation assessment upon discontinuation and no mutations were identified. Conclusion: Rapid CCyR occurs in nearly all pts with previously untreated CML-CP treated with frontline dasatinib therapy with a favorable toxicity profile. None of the patients have transformed to AP/BP confirming the efficacy of dasatinib as initial therapy for CML-CP. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Jabbour:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Ravandi:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Combination Therapy with Ofatumumab and Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results of a Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1788-1788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Xavier Badoux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Treatment Indications ◽  
Superficial Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1788 Patients with relapsed CLL have limited effective treatment options, and new therapies are needed. We report the results of a phase II study which investigated the efficacy and tolerability of a combination regimen with ofatumumab and lenalidomide in patients (pts) with relapsed CLL. These agents were evaluated as a combination regimen for pts with relapsed CLL based on their documented single-agent efficacy, distinct and potentially complimentary mechanisms of action and non-overlapping toxicities. Furthermore, the combination of rituximab and lenalidomide was active in relapsed CLL (Badoux et al. 2010). Pts with symptomatic disease who met treatment indications were eligible. Other inclusion criteria required prior treatment with purine analogs, an ECOG PS score of 0–2, and adequate organ function (creatinine clearance > 30ml/min, total bilirubin < to 2 mg/dl, ALT < 2 × ULN). Pts with any neutrophil count were eligible. Pts were excluded for platelets < 30,000 mm3, positivity for HIV, active hepatitis B or C or recent history of tuberculosis. Pts received ofatumumab IV weekly for four weeks (300mg week 1; 1,000 mg weeks 2 to 4), monthly during months 2–6, and every other month during months 7–24. Lenalidomide 10 mg PO daily was started on day 9 and continued daily for a maximum of 24 months. Allopurinol 300mg PO daily was given during the first two weeks of cycle 1. No pts received antibiotic or DVT prophylaxis. The use of growth factors was according to standard guidelines. Responses were assessed after 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Between January 2010 and January 2011, 36 pts were enrolled and 34 pts are evaluable (one pt withdrew consent prior to treatment and one was excluded because of concomitant MDS). The median age of the pts was 62 yrs (34–82). Twenty pts (59%) had Rai III-IV disease. The median beta-2M level at start of therapy was 4.4 mg/dL (1.7-16.5). The median number of prior treatments was 2 (1–8). All pts had received prior chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR). Twelve pts (35%) were fludarabine-refractory. Twenty-two pts (65%) had unmutated IgHV genes, 9 (26%) del(17p) and 4 (12%) del(11q). Responses were evaluated according to the 2008 NCI-WG criteria: 5 pts (15%) achieved CR (including 1 CRi) and 17 pts (50%) PR, for an ORR of 65%. Of the 5 CR pts, 1 was MRD-negative by flow cytometry. Two of the PR pts achieved marrow CR and only had persistent lymphadenopathy. Of the 22 responders, 13 are continuing on therapy with ongoing response (median time on therapy 14 months, range 8–20 months). Despite ongoing response, 7 pts discontinued therapy due to: transition to HSCT (3 pts; after 3, 6 and 6 months, respectively), pulmonary embolism (1 pt; after 4 months), recurrent zoster infection (1 pt; after 17 months of therapy) and physician choice (2 pts; after 9 and 16 months of therapy). Two pts discontinued therapy because of loss of response after 12 and 18 months of treatment, respectively. Thirty-one pts (91%) are alive. There have been no deaths on therapy. Three deaths occurred after discontinuation of therapy due to refractory disease (1), following HSCT (1) and due to progressive disease and adenocarcinoma of the lung (1). The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related hematological adverse events included neutropenia (15 pts, 44%), thrombocytopenia (3 pts, 9%) and anemia (1 pt, 3%). Thrombotic events occurred in 2 pts (6%). One pt experienced grade 3 pulmonary embolism and another patient grade 2 superficial vein thrombosis. In both cases with thrombotic event, ESAs were concomitantly administered. One pt (3%) experience a grade 3 infusion reaction during the first ofatumumab administration. Eight grade 3 infectious episodes occurred: pneumonia (3), neutropenic fever (2), parotitis (1), LE cellulitis (1) and CNS toxoplasmosis based on radiological findings (1). Intermittent grade 1–2 diarrhea was reported by 8 pts (24%). Grade 1–2 lenalidomide-associated tumor flare reaction was seen in 8 pts (24%). The median tolerated daily dose of lenalidomide was 5 mg/day (2.5-10 mg). In conclusion, the combination of ofatumumab and lenalidomide is well tolerated. Neutropenia was the most common toxicity. This combination induced responses in 65% of pts with relapsed CLL, all of whom had received prior chemoimmunotherapy. Responses are durable and ongoing in some pts. Disclosures: Ferrajoli: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. O'Brien:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Wierda:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document