Phase 1 Study Update of the Novel Pan-Pim Kinase Inhibitor LGH447 in Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 301-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc S Raab ◽  
Enrique M Ocio ◽  
Sheeba K. Thomas ◽  
Andreas Günther ◽  
Yeow-Tee Goh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: LGH447 is a novel, specific pan-Pim kinase inhibitor in development for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and other hematologic malignancies. The PIM (Provirus Integration site for Moloney leukemia) kinase gene family encodes 3 serine/threonine protein kinases that have roles in cell cycle progression and survival. In human disease, elevated levels of Pim1 and Pim2 are associated with hematologic malignancies, with MM showing the highest level of Pim2 expression. In preclinical studies, a majority of MM cell lines proved sensitive in vitro to LGH447-mediated Pim inhibition, exhibiting a dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation. LGH447 demonstrated significant tumor growth inhibition in xenograft mouse models of MM as compared with control animals, supporting the clinical development of LGH447 in MM patients. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MM for whom no effective treatment options exist were enrolled on this first-in-human, multicenter, open-label phase 1 dose-escalation study (CLGH447X2101). Escalating doses of single-agent LGH447 were administered orally on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or death. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of LGH447 administered as a single agent, orally, once daily. Secondary objectives included assessing the safety, tolerability, preliminary anti-myeloma activity, and pharmacokinetics of LGH447. Dose escalation followed a Bayesian logistic regression model based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Efficacy assessments were made by investigators according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria with modifications. Results:At the data cutoff, 54 patients have been treated at the following doses: 70 mg (n = 5), 150 mg (n = 6), 200 mg (n = 6), 250 mg (n = 7), 300 mg (n = 4), 350 mg (n=10), 500 mg (n=10), 700 mg (n=6), with the MTD determined to be 500 mg once daily. Median age was 65 years (range, 41-87 years). Most patients (92.6%) presented with baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-16). 81.5% had received prior proteasome inhibitor therapy, 83.3% had received prior immunomodulatory therapy (70.4% lenalidomide and 48.1% thalidomide), 68.5% were treated with both proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory therapies, and 87.0% had received prior stem cell transplant. Seventeen patients are ongoing at doses between 250-700 mg, with a median duration of exposure of 10.6 weeks (range, 0.1-56.1 weeks), and 37 patients discontinued (disease progression [n = 29], AEs [n = 4], withdrawal of consent [n = 4]). There were 8 DLTs, consisting of four grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (1 each at 200, 250, 350, 500 mg dose levels), two grade 3 fatigue (1 each at 500 and 700 mg dose levels), one grade 3 hypophosphatemia (300 mg), and one episode of vaso-vagal syncope (700 mg). This last event was the only reported unexpected serious AE that was suspected to be due to LGH447 treatment. The majority of AEs regardless of study drug relationship were grade 1/2. Most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (18.5%), anemia (18.5%), neutropenia (13%), and fatigue (11.1%). No deaths have occurred on study. Forty-eight individuals (70-500 mg) were evaluable for disease response assessments. Evidence of single agent activity was noted at doses ≥ 150 mg, including 1 VGPR at 200 mg (exposure duration > 55 weeks) and 4 PRs noted at doses ranging from 150-500 mg (respective exposure durations of 32, 29, 24, and 21 weeks). Five additional patients achieved MR, resulting in a clinical benefit rate (≥ MR) of 20.8%, and 23 patients were noted to have SD, resulting in a remarkable disease control rate (≥ SD) of 68.8%. In addition, of those patients with SD, 8 had exposure durations for > 20 weeks. Conclusions:In heavily treated patients with relapsed/refractory MM, LGH447 was generally well tolerated and exhibited evidence of durable single-agent efficacy in multiple patients, with the best response being a VGPR. These findings validate Pim kinase inhibition as a promising therapeutic rationale in MM patients and support further clinical development in patients. Disclosures Ocio: Novartis: Honoraria. Thomas:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding. Günther:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Goh:Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jannsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lebovic:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy. Jakubowiak:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SkylineDx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Song:Novartis: Employment. Xiang:Novartis: Employment. Patel:Novartis: Employment. Vanasse:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Phase 1 Study Of The Novel Pan-Pim Kinase Inhibitor LGH447 In Patients With Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3186-3186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc S Raab ◽  
Enrique M. Ocio ◽  
Sheeba K. Thomas ◽  
Andreas Günther ◽  
Daniel Lebovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Multiple Patients

Abstract Background LGH447 is a novel, specific pan-Pim kinase inhibitor in development for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and other hematologic malignancies. The PIM kinase gene family encodes 3 serine/threonine protein kinases that have roles in cell cycle progression and survival. In human disease, elevated levels of Pim1 and Pim2 are associated with hematologic malignancies, with MM showing the highest level of Pim2 expression. In preclinical studies, a majority of MM cell lines proved sensitive in vitro to LGH447-mediated Pim inhibition, exhibiting a dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation. Furthermore, LGH447 was well tolerated and demonstrated significant inhibition of tumor growth in xenograft mouse models of MM as compared with control animals, supporting the clinical development of LGH447 in MM patients. Methods Patients with relapsed/refractory MM for whom no effective treatment options exist were enrolled on this first-in-human, multicenter, open-label phase 1 dose-escalation study (CLGH447X2101). Escalating doses of single-agent LGH447 were administered orally on a continuous daily dosing schedule. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or death. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of LGH447 administered as a single agent, orally, once daily. Secondary objectives included assessing the safety, tolerability, preliminary antimyeloma activity, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of LGH447. Dose escalation followed a Bayesian logistic regression model based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. Efficacy assessments were made by investigators according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria with modifications. Following determination of the MTD for LGH447, additional patients will be enrolled in an expansion cohort to further characterize the safety and tolerability profile of LGH447. Results At the data cutoff, 19 patients have been treated at the following doses: 70 mg (n = 5), 150 mg (n = 6), 200 mg (n = 4), 250 mg (n = 4), with enrollment ongoing in dose escalation. Median age was 66 years (range, 41-75 years). Most patients (94.7%) presented with baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Most patients (73.7%) had received ≥ 2 prior regimens (median 4; range, 1-11), 89.5% had received prior bortezomib, and 84.2% had received prior lenalidomide and/or thalidomide (68.4% and 47.4%, respectively). Ten patients are ongoing at doses between 150-250 mg, with a median duration of exposure of 6 weeks (range, 1-26.6 weeks), and 9 patients discontinued (disease progression [n = 6], AEs [n = 2], withdrawal of consent [n = 1]). There was 1 DLT consisting of grade 3 thrombocytopenia at the 200 mg dose level and no reported suspected unexpected serious AEs. The majority of AEs regardless of study drug relationship were grade 1/2. Most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (31.6%), anemia (21.1%), and neutropenia (15.8%). No deaths have occurred on study. LGH447 displayed time-dependent PK with a 3- to 6-fold accumulation from day 1 to steady state (day 14). After a single oral dose, area under the curve and maximum concentration increased somewhat more than in proportion to the dose from 70 to 250 mg. Evidence of single-agent activity, as determined by investigators using IMWG criteria, has been seen in multiple patients, with best response to date being a very good partial response (VGPR). Conclusion In heavily treated patients with relapsed/refractory MM, LGH447 was generally well tolerated and exhibited evidence of single-agent efficacy in multiple patients, validating Pim kinase inhibition as a promising therapeutic rationale and supporting its further clinical development in patients with MM and other hematologic malignancies. Dose escalation is ongoing and updated results will be presented. Disclosures: Ocio: BMS: Consultancy; Arry-520: Consultancy; Pharmamar: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Thomas:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Research Funding. Günther:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lebovic:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Allos/Spectrum: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau. Kumar:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. Song:Novartis: Employment. Xiang:Novartis: Employment. Hynds:Novartis: Employment. Vanasse:Novartis: Employment. Goh:Jannsen: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hospira: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

A Phase 1/2 Study of G-CSF, Cladribine, Cytarabine, and Dose-Escalated Mitoxantrone (G-CLAM) in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1068-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna B. Halpern ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Emily M Huebner ◽  
Kaysey F. Orlowski ◽  
Bart L. Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Introduction:"7+3" with standard doses of cytarabine and an anthracycline has remained the mainstay of induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML. Since some studies have shown improved outcomes with high-dose cytarabine, cladribine, or escalated doses of anthracyclines, we conducted a phase 1/2 study (NCT02044796) of G-CLAM using escalated doses of mitoxantrone for newly diagnosed AML or high-risk MDS (>10% blasts). Methods: Patients≥18 years were eligible if they had treatment-related mortality (TRM) scores of ≤6.9 (corresponding to a predicted risk of early death with standard induction chemotherapy of ≤6.9%) and adequate organ function (LVEF ≥45%, creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL, bilirubin ≤2.5 times upper limit of normal). Excluded were patients with uncontrolled infection or concomitant illness with expected survival <1 year. In phase 1, cohorts of 6-12 patients were assigned to 1 of 4 total dose levels of mitoxantrone (12, 14, 16, or 18 mg/m2/day, days 1-3, compared to 10 mg/m2/day used in standard dose G-CLAM previously established in relapsed/refractory AML). Other drug doses were G-CSF 300 or 480 μg/day (for weight </≥76 kg; days 0-5), cladribine 5 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), and cytarabine 2 g/m2/day (days 1-5). In phase 2, patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of mitoxantrone. A second identical course of G-CLAM was given if complete remission (CR) was not achieved with cycle 1. Up to 4 cycles of consolidation with G-CLA (mitoxantrone omitted) were allowed if CR or CR with incomplete platelet or blood count recovery (CRp/i) was achieved with 1-2 cycles of induction therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were: 1) grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours that resulted in >7-day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle; 2) grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity if recovery to grade ≤2 within 14 days, both excluding febrile neutropenia, infection or constitutional symptoms. Results: Among 33 patients (median age of 57.3 [range: 26-77], median TRM score 2.31 [0.16-5.90]) treated in phase 1, one DLT occurred at dose levels 3 and 4 (respiratory failure in both cases), establishing G-CLAM with mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m2/day as the MTD. Sixty-two patients, including 6 treated in phase 1, received G-CLAM at MTD. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 58 (21-81) years, median TRM score 2.85 (0.06-6.73), with AML (n=52) or high-risk MDS (n=10). Cytogenetics were favorable in 6, intermediate in 44, and adverse in 12 (MRC criteria); 11 patients had NPM1 and 6 had FLT3 mutations. Fifty-two patients (83.9%, 95% confidence interval: 72.3-92.0%) achieved a CR (n=48 [77.4%: 65.0-87.1%]), or CRp/i (n=4 [6.5%: 1.8-15.7%]) with 1-2 cycles of therapy. Only 3 patients required 2 cycles to best response. Among the 48 CR patients, 43 (89.6%) were negative for measurable residual disease (MRDneg) by flow cytometry. Four patients had morphologic leukemia free state, 1 patient with myeloid sarcoma had a partial remission, 4 had resistant disease, and 1 died from indeterminate cause. One patient died within 28 days of treatment initiation (septic shock). Median times to an absolute neutrophil count ≥500/μL and a platelet count of ≥50,000/μL were 26 and 23 days. Besides infections and neutropenic fever, maculopapular rash, and hypoxia (fluid overload/infection-related) were the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. In addition to the phase 1/2 MTD cohort, there were 15 patients treated in an expansion cohort and 3 eligible patients treated off protocol with mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m2. For these 80 patients combined treated at MTD, the CR and CR/CRp/i rates were 76.3% and 81.2%. After multivariable adjustment, compared to 300 patients treated with 7+3 on the SWOG S0106 trial, G-CLAM with mitoxantrone 18mg/ m2 was associated with an increased probability of CR (odds ratio [OR]= 3.08, p=.02), CR/CRp/i (OR=2.96, p=.03), a trend towards improved MRDnegCR (OR= 3.70, p=.06), and a trend towards improved overall survival ([OS]; hazard ratio=0.34, p=.07). For the entire study cohort, the 6 and 12-month relapse-free survival were 73% (64-83%) and 62% (42-74%) and the 6 and 12-month OS were 89% (82- 96%) and 77% (67-88%). Conclusions: G-CLAM with mitoxantrone up to 18 mg/m2/day is well tolerated and has potent anti-leukemia activity. This regimen may warrant further randomized comparison with 7+3. We also plan to examine the addition of sorafenib to G-CLAM in newly diagnosed AML patients regardless of FLT3 status. Disclosures Othus: Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Becker:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Erba:Ariad: Consultancy; Gylcomimetics: Other: DSMB; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, DSMB, Speakers Bureau; Celator: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase 2 Open-Label, Multicenter, Dose Optimization Clinical Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Profiles of Cfi-400945 As a Single Agent or in Combination with Azacitidine or Decitabine in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (TWT-202)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4432-4432
Author(s):  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Brian A. Jonas ◽  
Emily L Roberts-Thomson ◽  
Glenn C. Michelson ◽  
Mark R Bray
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Refractory Aml

Abstract Background: CFI-400945 is a potent, selective, orally administered, first-in-class inhibitor of the serine/threonine kinase, Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4). PLK4 is a highly conserved master upstream regulator of centriole duplication and is critical for maintenance of genomic integrity. Aberrant expression of PLK4 results in a number of effects including the centrosome amplification often seen in aneuploid cancers, pointing to a potentially causative role for PLK4 in genome instability and cancer progression. A Phase 1 study has been completed evaluating CFI-400945 as a monotherapy in solid tumors, showing a tolerable safety profile and promising signs of activity. Given acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by genomic instability, CFI-400945 has been evaluated in pre-clinical and clinical studies in AML. In pre-clinical studies, CFI-400945 showed potent activity towards leukemia cell lines and primary human samples in vitro, as well as marked efficacy in two subcutaneous models of leukemia. A prior Phase 1 trial in AML was initiated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Center (PMCC), and of six patients evaluable for response, two (33%) achieved complete remission (CR) at 96 mg and 128 mg, and 3 patients (50%) had stable disease (with one patient having a 78% reduction in marrow blast count) at 64 mg (2 patients) and 96 mg [re: Murphy et al, ASH 2020]. Responses were seen in patients with adverse cytogenetics. The optimal dosing of CFI-400945 and its potential role as a combination agent are not yet clinically defined. Study Design and Methods: The study (TWT-202) has 4 parts, Part 1A (1A): a single agent dose escalation portion, Part 1B (1B): a food effect portion once the MTD of 1A is determined, and combinations with azacitidine (2A), and decitabine (2B). TWT-202 uses an updated version of investigational product which is identical in formulation to the drug used in the PMCC study, but which may result in higher exposures at a given dose. This study will therefore refine the dose through escalation cohorts. For parts 1A and 1B, patients with relapsed and/or refractory AML, MDS, or CMML after &gt;1 prior therapy will be included. Patients with MDS or CMML must have progressed or had a lack of response after at least 4 cycles of hypomethylating agents. For parts 2A and 2B, patients should have relapsed and/or refractory AML or untreated MDS or CMML. Untreated patients who decline or are ineligible for intensive therapy may be included. The study will use a standard 3 + 3 design. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be defined as the dose level where the number of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) is &lt;1 out of 6 at highest dose level below the maximally administered dose. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) markers will be assessed. Results: As of June 21, 2021, 2 patients had been enrolled into the study, one of the patients (50%) received &gt;3 prior therapies (including venetoclax). Neither patient had had stem cell transplant at study entry. Both patients had secondary AML (one with antecedent MDS with excess blasts and the other with CMML). Both patients received 32 mg of CFI-400945 for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest. Both patients completed cycle 1 and neither experienced a DLT. Both patients experienced a single serious treatment emergent adverse event (SAE) of febrile neutropenia each, with neither event considered related to CFI-400945. There were 13 Grade 3 or greater TEAE's, including anemia, thrombocytopenia (3 events each), febrile neutropenia (2 events), agitation, angioinvasive fungal sinusitis, acute kidney injury, hypotension and neutropenia (1 event each). None of the grade 3 or greater TEAE's were considered related to CFI-400945. Neither patient responded to therapy at 32 mg and both came off treatment after one cycle due to progressive disease. PK and PD studies are pending. Conclusion: CFI-400945 has been generally well tolerated and TWT-202 continues to enroll in the Part 1A and Part 1B monotherapy cohorts. Updated safety, efficacy, PK, and PD data for the study will be presented at the time of the meeting. Disclosures Borthakur: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: Current Employment; ArgenX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Protagonist: Consultancy; Astex: Research Funding; Ryvu: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jonas: 47, AbbVie, Accelerated Medical Diagnostics, Amgen, AROG, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Forma, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlycoMimetics, Hanmi, Immune-Onc, Incyte, Jazz, Loxo Oncology, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sigma Tau, Treadwell: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Travel reimbursement; AbbVie, BMS, Genentech, GlycoMimetics, Jazz, Pfizer, Takeda, Treadwell: Consultancy. Roberts-Thomson: Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment. Michelson: Treadwell Therapeutics: Consultancy. Bray: Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment.

A Phase I/II Open-Label Multicenter Study Of The Cyclin Kinase Inhibitor AT7519M Alone and In Combination With Bortezomib In Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1976-1976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noopur Raje ◽  
Parameswaran N. Hari ◽  
Heather Landau ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Jacalyn Rosenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Cyclin Kinase Inhibitor

Abstract Background The benefits of targeting the cyclins and RNAPII transcription in multiple myeloma (MM) was previously demonstrated using the cyclin kinase inhibitor AT7519 in preclinical studies. Predicated upon this work, a phase I/II trial was undertaken in relapsed refractory MM patients Purpose To identify the optimum dose of the AT7519M both as a single agent (Part one) and in combination with Bortezomib (Part two) in patients with MM. Methods In Part one nine patients with relapsed or refractory MM were treated with AT7519M alone using a twice weekly regimen (days one, four, eight and eleven) of a 21 day cycle. The starting dose of AT7519M was 21 mg/m2 per dose during Cycle one, and provided treatment was well tolerated the dose was escalated to 27 mg/m2 per dose for Cycle two onwards. In the second part of the study the safety and tolerability of the combination of AT7519M (dose levels 14 and 21 mg/m2 per dose) with Bortezomib (dose levels 1 and 1.3 mg/m2 per dose) were explored in an escalating fashion using a “3 + 3” design. In order to be eligible patients must have measurable MM, and initially must have had progressed through at least two previous lines of therapy or following a protocol amendment, been refractory to Bortezomib, as defined by progression on a Bortezomib-containing regimen within six weeks of starting the study. Patients with significantly abnormal liver or renal function (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min) or significant underlying neuropathy were excluded. Results The median number of cycles of treatment administered in the first part of the study (9 patients) was two (range two to four) and the best response to treatment was stable disease. Two patients discontinued treatment as a result of toxicity – one as a result of a persistent elevation in serum creatinine and the second as a consequence of Grade 3 fatigue. Two patients did not undergo a dose escalation to 27 mg/m2 as planned because of poor tolerability of the 21 mg/m2 dose (fatigue) or progressive disease. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the two dose levels revealed overlapping exposure and further evaluation of the 27 mg/m2 dose was not performed. In the second part of the study, three patients per cohort, 9 patients in total, were treated at escalating AT7519/Bortezomib dose levels of 14 mg/m2/1 mg/m2; 21 mg/m2/1 mg/m2 21 mg/m2/1.3 mg/m2. The median number of previous regimens was 5 (range 2 – 6). Based on the investigator assessments at least one objective response was seen at each dose level (MR x1, PR x 2, VGPR x 1). The median number of cycles received was three (range one to 9; ongoing). There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most commonly reported adverse events to date have been haematological in nature. There have been two adverse events ≥Grade 3 in severity (neutropenia, and dyspnea) considered to be at least possibly related to treatment. Conclusions Treatment with AT7519M was well tolerated in this patient population and full doses of this agent and Bortezomib were successfully achieved in combination. The maximum tolerated dose was 21 mg/m2 AT7519M and 1.3 mg/m2 Bortezomib. Although no significant efficacy was seen following treatment with AT7519M alone in this heavily pretreated patient population, the combination of AT7519M with Bortezomib achieved significant (33% ≥ PR) responses in a proportion of patients who were either pre-treated with or refractory to treatment with Bortezomib. Disclosures: Raje: Celgene, Millenium, Onyx, Amgen: Consultancy; Acetylon, Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Richardson:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Britsol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lyons:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Langford:Astex: Employment. Yule:Astex: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Preliminary Results from a Phase 1 Study of Cfi-400495, a PLK4 Inhibitor, in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High Risk MDS

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Tracy Murphy ◽  
Brian Leber ◽  
Mark R Bray ◽  
Steven M Chan ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Refractory Aml

Introduction: CFI-400945 is a first-in-class, potent, selective, orally active inhibitor of Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) (Ki=0.26nM), a master regulator of centriole duplication, necessary for genomic integrity (Mason et al. Cancer Cell 2014; 26:163-76). CFI-400945 has activity in leukemia cell lines and primary leukemia samples including those with complex karyotype, inversion 3 and monosomy 7 (Minden. personal communications). This suggests that CFI-400945 may provide an effective treatment of patients with AML. The objectives of this phase 1 trial was to establish the safety, tolerability, and recommend phase II dose (RP2D) of CFI-400945 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory AML or MDS and patients with untreated AML who refused induction chemotherapy or who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy were eligible. Dose escalation followed a standard 3+3 design with a starting dose of 64 mg orally once daily. Plasma levels of CFI-400945 free base were measured on Days 1, 2, & 29 of Cycle 1 and Day 15 on all subsequent cycles. Peripheral blood and/or bone marrow were obtained at baseline, Day 8 of Cycle 1 and Day 1 of each subsequent cycle prior to dosing for pharmacodynamic monitoring. Safety assessments using the NCI CTCAE version 4.03 were performed. Results: From May 2018 to June 2019, nine patients have been enrolled on study across three pre-defined dose levels (64 mg [n=3], 96 mg [n=4], and 128 mg [n=2]). Three patients had untreated AML, five patients had relapsed/refractory AML and one patient had myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative disorder (MDS/MPN). Patient characteristics at diagnosis are outlined in Table 1. Six (67%) patients had baseline high throughput sequencing; the most frequent mutations were TP53 (33%), TET2 (33%), KRAS (33%) and DNMT3A (33%). A total of 20 cycles were administered with a median of 1 cycle (range, 0 to 7 cycles). The most common non-hematological drug related toxicities of any grade, which occurred in over 20%, were diarrhea (44%), headache (44%), colitis (33%), vomiting (33%), bilirubin increase (22%), dizziness (22%), fatigue (22%), and nausea (22%). One patient on the 96 mg dose level was not evaluable for DLT and hence, replaced. Both patients treated at the 128 mg/day dose level developed DLTs, consisting of grade 3 colitis and grade 5 sepsis and colitis. Pharmacokinetic profile indicated low interpatient variability between patients. Maximum exposure did not correlate with toxicity Six patients were evaluable for disease response. Two (33%) achieved complete remission (CR), 3 pts (50%) had stable disease (with one patient having a 78% reduction in marrow blast count). The patient with MDS/MPN who did not complete 1 cycle of therapy progressed to AML (Figure 1). Both patients who obtained a CR had an early response within 2 cycles. One CR has been durable for 218 days with no measurable residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry. The additional patient, who obtained a CR with incomplete platelets recovery, with subsequent best response of CR, had a sustained response for 91 days before relapse was confirmed by bone marrow examination (Figure 1). Conclusion: Single agent CFI-400945 has activity in patients with poor risk AML. The RP2D in this population is 96 mg once daily. Dose expansion is occurring at the RP2D level. A phase 2 study with CFI-400945 single agent or in combination study with azacitidine or decitabine is planned. Disclosures Leber: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Lundbeck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda/Palladin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Treadwell: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bray:Treadwell Therapeutics: Current Employment; TIO Discovery: Current Employment. Gupta:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Maze:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding. McNamara:Novartis: Honoraria. Schimmer:Jazz: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Medivir AB: Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Other: owns stock ; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria.

scholarly journals A Phase 1/2 Study of Umbralisib Ublituximab and Venetoclax in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 360-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Barr ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
Shuo Ma ◽  
Andrea M Baran ◽  
Andrew Bui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Grade 3

Background:Despite the effectiveness of novel agents in treating CLL, single agent use requires prolonged administration which can lead to drug resistance, toxicity and considerable cost over time. Combinations may provide deeper prolonged remissions using defined treatment durations. Umbralisib (Umbra) is a novel, highly-specific PI3Kδ inhibitor and ublituximab (Ubli) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting a unique epitope on CD20 and glycoengineered to enhance antibody dependent cellular toxicity. Combining these agents with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (Ven) may prevent drug resistance (Choudhary, Cell Death Dis 2015), avoid tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and achieve undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD). This phase 1/2 trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of Umbra + Ubli + Ven for 12 cycles followed by MRD evaluation in relapsed or refractory CLL patients (pts). Methods:Pts received three 28-day cycles of Umbra daily along with Ubli, administered weekly during cycle 1, then once during cycles 2 and 3, followed by Umbra + Ven for 9 additional cycles. During the phase 1 study, dose levels including Umbra 600mg and 800mg were tested with Ubli 900mg and Ven, increased in standard fashion to 400 mg during cycle 4. The primary endpoint for phase 1 was safety; the primary endpoint for phase 2 was complete remission (CR) rate by iwCLL criteria. MRD negativity (&lt;10-4by 8-color flow cytometry) was a key secondary endpoint with bone marrow and peripheral blood MRD negative pts stopping therapy after 12 cycles and other pts continuing on single agent Umbra. Results: 21 pts have been treated to date: 9 in phase 1 and 12 in phase 2. Baseline demographics were as follows: male/female (12/9), median age 65 yrs (range 49-83), median prior therapies 2 (1-5). 9 pts had prior ibrutinib of which 4 were BTK inhibitor refractory. BTK resistance mutations were found in 2 pts. High risk genetic features included unmutated IGHV genes (11 pts), del17p or del11q (7 pts), TP53 mut (1 pt), NOTCH1 mut (4 pts) and SF3B1 mut (1 pt). Baseline TLS risk was high, medium and low risk in 2, 12 and 7 pts respectively. During dose escalation, 3 pts were treated using Umbra 600mg and subsequently 6 pts using Umbra 800mg. No DLTs occurred, and the MTD was not reached. As such, the phase 2 dose used was Ubli 900 mg + Umbra 800 mg with venetoclax, undergoing ramp up to 400 mg. For all pts treated to date, the most common AEs were (all causality and all grade; &gt;20% of pts) infusion reactions (62%), thrombocytopenia (57%), neutropenia (52%), anemia (52%), fatigue (52%), ALT or AST increase (43%), nausea (33%), diarrhea (29%) and headache (24%). Grade 1 creatinine increase, hypocalcemia and hyperkalemia were observed in 12 (57%), 6 (29%) and 5 (24%) of pts respectively. These AEs predominately occurred outside of venetoclax ramp up. Grade 3/4 AE's occurring in ≥ 2 pts included neutropenia (n=4, 19%), infusion reaction (n=2, 10%) and thromboembolism (n=2, 10%). No grade ≥ 3 PI3Kδ-associated toxicities were noted (0 events of pneumonitis, colitis or grade 3/4 transaminitis). No events of TLS were observed. One pt discontinued study treatment due to grade 3 rash. All pts were converted to low TLS risk after 3 cycles of Umbra + Ubli, except for 1 pt who remained medium risk after discontinuing Ubli secondary to a grade 3 infusion reaction, allowing outpatient venetoclax initiation in all pts. In evaluable pts, the overall response rate was 85% (11/13) after cycle 3, 100% (9/9) after cycle 7 and 100% (5/5) after cycle 12. Of the 5 pts who finished 12 cycles of therapy, a median reduction in nodal disease of 87% occurred resulting in 2 CRs and 3 PRs by iwCLL criteria. 4 pts have undetectable MRD (&lt;0.01%) in both the peripheral blood and bone marrow and have stopped therapy. MRD was undetectable in peripheral blood and intermediate (0.01% - 1.0%) in the bone marrow for 1 pt who continues on Umbra. With a median f/u of 4.2 months (range 0.2-14.2), no pts have experienced disease progression. (Figure) Conclusion: We established the phase 2 dose of Umbra + Ubli + Ven and demonstrated good tolerability in pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Preliminary results suggest that this chemotherapy-free regimen can provide undetectable MRD after only 12 cycles, representing an effective treatment plan for this population. Ongoing enrollment is focused on pts who have relapsed after BTK inhibitors and a multi-center trial is planned to further develop the triplet regimen. Figure Disclosures Barr: Gilead: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Verastem: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hill:TG therapeutics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celegene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ma:Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Xeme: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Acerta: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Liesveld:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onconova: Other: Data safety monitoring board. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics: Employment. Miskin:TG therapeutics Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics: Employment. Friedberg:Acerta: Other: Data & Safety Monitoring Committee; Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Data & Safety Monitoring Committee. Zent:Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Mentrik Biotech: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: umbralisib and ublituximab as treatment of CLL

scholarly journals Preliminary Results from a Phase 1 Study of Gilteritinib in Combination with Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy in Subjects with Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 722-722
Author(s):  
Keith Pratz ◽  
Mohamad Cherry ◽  
Jessica K. Altman ◽  
Brenda W. Cooper ◽  
Jose Carlos Cruz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
End Of Treatment

Abstract Background: Gilteritinib is a novel, potent, highly-selective oral fms -like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)/AXL inhibitor with clinical activity in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML with activating FLT3-ITD and -TKD mutations. In such patients, once-daily gilteritinib ≥80 mg/day, as a single agent, elicited a response rate of 52% and median overall survival (OS) of 31 weeks (Perl AE, et al. Lancet Oncol . 2017.). Here we examined the safety/tolerability and antitumor activity of gilteritinib combined with front-line intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed AML patients. Methods: The primary objective of this open-label, dose-escalation/expansion Phase 1 study (NCT02236013) was to assess the safety/tolerability profile (including dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] and maximum tolerated dose [MTD]) of gilteritinib when combined with 7+3 induction and high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation, and administered as single-agent maintenance therapy in subjects aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed AML. Assessment of antitumor effects of this combination therapy was an exploratory objective. Dose escalation followed a 3+3 design where successive cohorts of 3-6 subjects received gilteritinib doses of 40, 80, or 120 mg/day. Dose-escalation decisions were made based on DLTs that occurred during remission induction. A DLT was defined as any grade ≥3 non-hematologic or extramedullary toxicity (with exceptions) or hematologic toxicity that occurred after the first gilteritinib dose and did not resolve by Day 42 of the last induction cycle or before initiation of consolidation therapy. Subjects received up to 2 cycles of a 7+3 induction regimen (cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day, days 1-7 plus idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day, days 1-3) plus once-daily oral gilteritinib, which was initially administered on days 1-14 but was subsequently changed to administration on days 4-17 at the designated dose. During consolidation, subjects received cytarabine (1.5 g/m2 every 12 hours, days 1, 3, and 5) and once-daily gilteritinib (days 1-14) at the induction dose, for up to 3 cycles. Subjects in the dose-expansion cohort, received gilteritinib at the recommended expansion dose established during dose escalation. After consolidation, subjects received maintenance therapy with once-daily gilteritinib (28-day cycles; up to 26 cycles). Results: As of July 9, 2017, 50 subjects had been enrolled (n=17, dose-escalation cohort; n=33, dose-expansion cohort); 49 had received at least 1 dose of gilteritinib. Most subjects were male (67.3%; n=33); median age was 59 years (range, 23-77 years). Of the 48 subjects with known FLT3 mutation status, 23 (47.9%) were FLT3mut+, of whom 15 (65.2%) had internal tandem duplications. During dose-escalation, 2 subjects in the 40 mg/day cohort who had received gilteritinib on days 1-14 experienced DLTs (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and decreased ejection fraction). After gilteritinib induction schedule modification, no additional DLTs were observed. The MTD was not reached; gilteritinib 120 mg/day was chosen as the recommended expansion dose. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in ≥10% of subjects were febrile neutropenia (53.1%), thrombocytopenia (18.4%), neutropenia (16.3%), decreased platelet count (12.2%), sepsis (10.2%), and decreased white blood cell count (10.2%). Serious drug-related TEAEs occurring in &gt;1 subject were febrile neutropenia (16.3%), sepsis (6.1%), and decreased ejection fraction (4.1%). The end of treatment investigator-reported composite complete remission (CRc) rate for all subjects was 71.4% and 57.1% achieved complete remission (Table). In FLT3mut+ and FLT3 mutation-negative (FLT3mut−) subjects, end-of-treatment CRc rates were 91.3% and 56%, respectively. Among subjects who received ≥80 mg/day gilteritinib (n=40), end-of-treatment CRc rates were 90% (n=18/20) for FLT3mut+ and 60% (n=12/20) for FLT3mut− subjects. Median OS and duration of response have not been reached. For the total study population, median event-free survival (EFS) was 327 days and median disease-free survival (DFS) was 297 days; FLT3mut+ subjects had a longer median EFS (327 days) and DFS (134 days) than FLT3mut− subjects (EFS, 80 days; DFS, not estimable). Conclusions: In subjects with newly diagnosed AML, gilteritinib combined with intensive chemotherapy was well tolerated (MTD &gt;120 mg/day) with seemingly high response rates in FLT3mut+ subjects. Disclosures Cherry: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman: NCCN: Other: Educational speaker; Syros: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Ceplene: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; ASH: Other: Educational speaker. Cooper: Novartis: Research Funding. Jurcic: Syros Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Levis: Astellas Pharma Us: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding. Lin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Perl: Arog Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Asana Biosciences: Other: Scientific advisory board; Astellas: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Seattle Genetics: Other: Advisory board. Podoltsev: Alexion: Consultancy; CTI biopharma/Baxalta: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Schiller: Celator/Jazz: Research Funding. Liu: Astellas Global Pharma, Inc.: Employment. Bahceci: Astellas Pharma Global Development: Employment.

scholarly journals Aspacytarabine (BST-236) Is Safe and Efficacious As a Single-Agent, First-Line Therapy for Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Unfit for Standard Chemotherapy. Integrated Results from a Phase 1/2a and an Ongoing Phase 2b

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 179-179
Author(s):  
Jessica K. Altman ◽  
Tsila Zuckerman ◽  
Olga Frankfurt ◽  
Selina M. Luger ◽  
Dale L. Bixby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Prior Exposure ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ongoing Phase

Introduction: Aspacytarabine (BST-236) is a prodrug of cytarabine, a backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy. Due to its unique pharmacokinetics and metabolism, treatment with aspacytarabine evades peak exposure to free cytarabine, which reduces non-hematological toxicity and enables delivery of high-dose cytarabine also to patients unfit for standard therapy. Data from a completed phase 1/2a and an ongoing phase 2b studies in AML patients unfit for standard therapy, including patients with AML secondary to therapy and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with prior exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMA), demonstrate promising single-agent efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a potential first-line AML treatment for this challenging population. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine in AML patients unfit for standard induction therapy. Methods: A completed phase 1/2a study and an ongoing phase 2b study evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a single-agent therapeutic for AML. The phase 1/2a, dose-escalation study enrolled newly-diagnosed patients unfit for standard therapy and patients with relapsed/refractory AML. Patients were treated with 0.3-6 g/m2/d aspacytarabine in 6 dose-escalating cohorts. The ongoing multi-center phase 2b study expands the subgroup of newly-diagnosed AML patients unfit for standard therapy, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspacytarabine as a first-line therapy for this population. Secondary AML patients, treated with HMA, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy for a prior condition, are allowed. Patients in the phase 2b study are treated with the selected aspacytarabine dose of 4.5 g/m2/d, containing approximately 3 g/m2/d of cytarabine. Each aspacytarabine treatment course (induction and consolidation) consists of 6 1-hour daily intravenous infusions. Results: To date, 34 AML patients, median age 76 years, received at least 1 dose of aspacytarabine, including 30 patients unfit for standard induction therapy due to age or comorbidities. Overall, 25 patients completed 1 course of aspacytarabine, 4 patients completed 2 courses, 1 patient completed 3 courses, and 1 patient completed 4 courses of aspacytarabine. Three patients (in the phase 1/2a study) did not complete the first course. Aspacytarabine was safe and well-tolerated in repeated-course administration, including in older and unfit patients. Adverse events included mainly hematological "on-target" events with no drug-related mucositis or cerebellar toxicity. Twenty-one patients were newly-diagnosed with AML, either de novo or secondary to MDS or therapy. The patient population was characterized by older age (median 76 years, range 67-88 years), and the majority (67%) of patients had secondary AML, including 10 patients (48%) who were previously treated with HMA (median of 10 courses) or radiotherapy. The median baseline bone marrow blast percentage of this population was 75, and 43% and 48% had intermediate or adverse European LeukemiaNet (ELN) cytogenetic score, respectively. Despite these poor-prognostic characteristics, the 30-day mortality rate in the group of patients receiving ≥4.5 g/m2/d aspacytarabine was 7%. The combined complete remission (CR) rate of all doses was 33%, including 1 patient reaching a CR with partial platelet recovery (CRp). The CR rate in patients treated with at least 4.5 g/m2/d aspacytarabine is 36%, with median time for complete hematological recovery of 27 days (range 21-30) following induction and consolidation. Notably, among the 7 patients who reached a CR/CRp (median age 77), 3 secondary AML patients reached a CR, including 2 patients with prior exposure to HMA (5 and 10 courses) and 1 with prior exposure to radiotherapy (Table 1). Duration of response and overall survival follow up is ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: The accumulating clinical data suggest that aspacytarabine is safe and efficacious for the treatment of AML patients who are unfit for standard induction therapy, including patients with prior exposure to HMA, which may establish aspacytarabine as a new therapeutic backbone for AML, either as a single agent or in combination with targeted therapy. Disclosures Altman: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biosight: Other: US Lead; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer Expert Now: Consultancy; France Foundation: Speakers Bureau; prIME Oncology: Speakers Bureau; PeerView: Speakers Bureau; Theradex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Luger:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Onconova: Research Funding; Kura: Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Genetech: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Cyslacel: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria. Kota:Takeda: Honoraria; Xcenda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Flaishon:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Tessler:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Gengrinovitch:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Ben Yakar:BioSight Ltd.: Employment. Rowe:BioSight: Consultancy.

Efficacy and Safety of Nilotinib in Elderly Patients with Imatinib-Resistant or -;Intolerant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Chronic Phase (CP): A Sub-Analysis of the ENACT (Expanding Nilotinib Access in Clinical Trials) Study.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3286-3286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp D. le Coutre ◽  
Anna Turkina ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Bernadeta Ceglarek ◽  
Giuliana Alimena ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Imatinib Resistant ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3286 Poster Board III-1 Introduction: Nilotinib, a potent and highly selective BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogeneous leukemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase (CML-CP) and accelerated phase (CML-AP) who are resistant or intolerant to prior therapy including imatinib. The ENACT study is a Phase IIIb, open-label, multicenter study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib in adult pts with imatinib-resistant or intolerant CML in a clinical practice setting outside of a registration program. It is the largest single source of efficacy and safety information of any available tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in CML, particularly among the elderly. Methods: The present is a sub-analysis of the ENACT study on the efficacy and safety of 400 mg twice daily nilotinib in elderly (aged =60 years) pts initiating treatment in CML-CP who were resistant and/or intolerant to imatinib. Results: Of the 1,422 CML-CP pts enrolled in the ENACT study between January 2006 and October 2008, 452 (32%) were elderly (=60 years) at study initiation and 165 (37%) of these pts were =70 years [10 (2%) were =80 years]. Countries that enrolled =20 elderly pts include France, Italy, USA, Germany, UK, Spain, Canada, and Brazil. At study initiation, elderly pts had longer median durations of CML (<60: 51.1 months; =60: 69.3; =70: 66.6) and higher proportions with CML duration >5 years (<60: 43%; =60: 56%; =70: 52%). Besides imatinib, prior CML treatments received by elderly pts included dasatinib (=60: 20%; =70: 19%), cytarabine (=60: 23%; =70: 19%), busulfan (=60: 10%; =70: 7%), and interferons (=60: 50%; =70: 42%). Elderly pts were previously treated with imatinib for longer median durations (<60: 27.4 months; =60: 32.7; =70: 29.9), with higher proportions treated for >5 years (<60: 12%; =60: 19%; =70: 18%). The proportion of imatinib-intolerant to resistant elderly pts was about 1:1, which was higher than the proportion among <60 pts at about 0.6:1, such that relatively few elderly pts had prior highest imatinib dose >800 mg (<60: 34%; =60: 26%; =70: 21%). While response rates to prior imatinib were similar, among pts who required therapy after failing imatinib, elderly pts had lower cytogenetic response rates (<60: 22%; =60: 17%; =70: 19%) to prior dasatinib. During ENACT, less than 50% of elderly pts experienced nilotinib dose interruptions (=60: 46%; =70: 41%) and reductions (=60: 7%; =70: 6%) lasting >5 days, which was consistent with the overall ENACT dataset. The median duration of dose interruptions and reductions was 15 (=70: also 15) and 41 (=70: 32) days, respectively. The main reason for dose interruptions and reductions was adverse events (AEs). The median duration of nilotinib exposure was 227 days (=70: 219) and the median dose intensity was 749 mg/day (=70: 775). Efficacy was similar among elderly pts, with 39% (=70: 35%) of pts achieving complete hematologic response (CHR), 41% (=70: 39%) achieving major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and 31% (=70: 33%) achieving complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). MCyR rate was also similar among elderly hematologic responders (=60: 64%; =70: 65%). Among elderly pts requiring nilotinib therapy after both imatinib and dasatinib, and therefore have more resistant CML, CHR rate was 39% (=70: 32%), MCyR rate was 28% (=70: 29%) and CCyR rate was 20% (=70: 16%). Safety was likewise similar among elderly pts, with grade 3/4 study drug-related AEs occurring in 56% of pts (=70: 53%). The most frequent of these AEs were thrombocytopenia (=60: 24%; =70: 21%) and neutropenia (=60: 14%; =70: 11%). The most common method of managing these AEs was brief dose interruptions and/or reductions [thrombocytopenia (=60:86/108 pts; =70: 30/35), neutropenia (=60: 42/62 pts; =70: 9/18)]. Among elderly pts with prior dasatinib, 53% (=70: 58%) experienced grade 3/4 study drug-related AEs, while 7 out of 8 pts with pleural effusion on dasatinib no longer had it on nilotinib. Conclusions: In ENACT, pts aged =60 years at study initiation appear to have longer durations of CML, be more heavily pre-treated and more intolerant to imatinib than the younger cohort. Nonetheless, nilotinib induced comparable clinical responses in CML-CP pts regardless of age. Importantly, the safety profile of nilotinib is maintained in elderly pts. Disclosures: le Coutre: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Turkina:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Kim:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Ceglarek:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Shen:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Smith:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Rizzieri:Novartis Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Szczudlo:Novartis: Employment. Berton:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wang:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Wang:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nicolini:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chemgenex: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Phase II Study of the Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Bortezomib-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (PANORAMA 2)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 814-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 814FN2 Background: Patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and an extremely poor prognosis. A recent study of patients who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD, thalidomide or lenalidomide) demonstrated a median event-free survival of only 5 months (Kumar S et al, Leukemia, 2011). Panobinostat is an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that increases acetylation of proteins involved in multiple oncogenic pathways. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity of the combination of panobinostat and bortezomib through dual inhibition of the aggresome and proteasome pathways. In a phase I study (B2207) of patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat + bortezomib, clinical responses (≥ minimal response [MR]) were observed in 65% of patients, including in patients with bortezomib-refractory disease. PANORAMA 2 seeks to expand upon these preliminary results and seeks to determine whether panobinostat can sensitize resistant patients to a bortezomib-containing therapeutic regimen. Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single arm, phase II study of panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. Patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory MM (≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and who had progressed on or within 60 days of the last bortezomib-based therapy) are treated in 2 phases. Treatment phase 1 consists of 8 three-week cycles of oral panobinostat (20 mg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12) + intravenous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) + oral dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). Patients demonstrating clinical benefit (≥ stable disease) can proceed to treatment phase 2, consisting of 4 six-week cycles of panobinostat (20 mg TIW 2 weeks on 1 week off, and repeat) + bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 22, 29) + dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). The primary endpoint is overall response (≥ partial response [PR]), as defined by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 1998 criteria, in the first 8 cycles of treatment phase 1. A Simon 2-stage design is used to test the primary endpoint where ≥ 4 responses (≥ PR) in 24 patients are needed in stage 1 in order to proceed to stage 2, where ≥ 9 responses in all patients (N = 47) are required to reject the null hypothesis (overall response rate ≤ 10%). Results: A sufficient number of responses ≥ PR were observed in stage 1 to allow for enrollment to continue to stage 2. As of 15 July 2011, 53 patients with bortezomib-refractory MM were enrolled. Safety and demographic data were available for 48 patients. The median age was 61 (41–88) years. Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 4 (2–14) prior regimens, and most patients (69%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Efficacy data were available for 44 patients. At the time of this analysis, 9 patients achieved ≥ PR (2 near CR [nCR] and 7 PR) as best overall response, and an additional 7 patients achieved an MR. Responders exhibited a long duration on therapy, and, to date, 8 patients have proceeded to treatment phase 2. The 2 patients with nCR have received ≥ 10 cycles of treatment (duration of therapy 190 and 253 days). Four patients who achieved PR have received ≥ 9 cycles (duration of therapy 155–225 days). Updated response data will be presented. Common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included, fatigue (52%), diarrhea (41%), thrombocytopenia (38%), nausea (38%), and anemia (21%). Gastrointestinal AEs were generally mild, with a relatively low incidence of grade 3/4 events. Grade 3/4 AEs were generally hematologic in nature, with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia reported in 38%, 12%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Other common nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (10%) and pneumonia (10%). Of note, to date, a relatively low rate of peripheral neuropathy (17%) has been observed. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy has been observed. Conclusions: The combination of panobinostat and bortezomib is a promising treatment for patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. These data, along with forthcoming data from the phase III study of panobinostat/placebo + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM (PANORAMA 1), will further define the potential role of panobinostat in the treatment of patients with MM. Disclosures: Richardson: Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alsina:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weber:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Warsi:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ondovik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mukhopadhyay:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document