Pre-Transplant R-Bendamustine Induces High Rates of Minimial Residual Disease in MCL Patients: Updated Results of S1106: US Intergroup Study of a Randomized Phase II Trial of R-HCVAD Vs. R-Bendamustine Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplants for Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 518-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Chen ◽  
Hongli Li ◽  
Steven H. Bernstein ◽  
Lisa M. Rimsza ◽  
Stephen J. Forman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Aggressive induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is effective for younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Among patients undergoing ASCT, cytarabine-based induction regimen induced higher rates of MRD-negativity compared to R-CHOP (Hermine et al, ASH 2012), and achievement of MRD-negative status was predictive of good outcome. R-bendamustine (RB) has superior efficacy compared to R-CHOP (Rummel et al, Lancet 2013; Flinn et al, Blood 2014) but, there are no data regarding its impact on MRD. S1106 (SWOG) was conducted to compare R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARAC (RH) or RB to identify the better induction regimen followed by ASCT. We report the result of MRD analysis and updated 2 year PFS/OS. Method: S1106 was a US intergroup (SWOG/ECOG/CALGB), randomized phase II trial. The primary objective was to estimate 2 year PFS, with secondary objectives to assess response rates, OS, toxicities, and MRD status. Inclusion criteria were: untreated stage III, IV or bulky stage II MCL, Cyclin D1 +, age > 18 < 65, and adequate organ function. Randomization was stratified by MIPI. Patients received either 4 cycles of RH or 6 cycles of RB, followed by ASCT. MRD was assessed at baseline and post induction. Genomic tumor DNA was extracted from FFPE tissue or bone marrow aspirate mononuclear cells. PCR amplification of IGH-VDJ, IGH-DJ, and IGK regions was performed followed by high-throughput sequencing to determine the tumor clonotype(s) (Adaptive Biotechnologies). DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and plasma was amplified and sequenced to determine lymphoma molecules per million diploid genomes. Results: A total of 53 patients were accrued out of planned 160. This study was closed prematurely based on predetermined criteria of stem cell mobilization failures on the RH arm. Table 1 shows patient characteristics. The ORR was 94% in RH vs. 83% in RB. The CR rates were 35% (RH) and 40% (RB). Only 4/17 patients on RH and 21/35 patients in RB underwent ASCT; the rest could not complete study (Table 1). RH induced significantly more grade 3/4 heme toxicities as compared to RB (Table 1). The median follow up was 29 months in RH and 26 months in RB. The estimated 2 year PFS was 81% (Fig 1) and OS was 87% for both arms. 27 patients consented to the optional MRD assessment, with 12 paired serial samples (baseline and post induction). 10 were in RB and 2 were in RH. Both patients in RH were MRD positive at baseline and achieved MRD negative status. 1/10 patient in RB was MRD negative at baseline and remained negative throughout treatment. 8/9 patients in RB with baseline MRD-positivity converted to MRD-negative status by the end of induction, and 3/8 did not go to ASCT. Three additional patients were missing baseline samples but were MRD negative at the end of RB. Overall, the estimated 2 year PFS was 100% for all 13 patients who achieved MRD negative status at the end of RB. Conclusions: RH is not an ideal platform for future transplant trials in MCL due to stem cell mobilization failures. RB achieved a 2 year PFS of 81%, higher than the planned target of 75%. It also achieved an 89% MRD negative rate on all the paired samples tested. Low CR on RB could be due to lack of mandatory PET. All patients with MRD negative status remain in remission, with some not having undergone ASCT. Premature closure of the study limited the sample size and the precision of PFS estimates and MRD. However, this analysis suggests that RB can achieve a deep remission and could be a platform for future trials in MCL. Table 1. RH (n=17) RB (n=35) Age 59 (44-66) 57 (33-64) Male (p=0.003) Female 9 8 32 3 Performance status 0 1 11 6 26 9 Disease Stage III IV 1 16 3 32 B sx Yes No 6 11 10 25 BM involvement Positive Negative 14 3 31 4 Extranodal involvement Yes No 15 2 32 3 KI 67 <10% 10-30% >30% 20% 60% 20% 14% 66% 20% MIPI Score Intermediate/High Risk Low Risk 6 11 13 22 Grade 3/4 Hematological toxicities (Induction only) Anemia 56% Neutropenia 63% Febrile neutropenia 31% Thrombocytopenia 69% Anemia 8.6% Neutropenia 34% Febrile neutropenia 14% Thrombocytopenia 17% Reasons for early off treatment or not going to ASCT Failure to collect stem cell 5 Thrombocytopenia 4 Pancytopenia 1 Others 2 Patient choice 4 Progressive disease 2 Failure to collect stem cell 1 Allergy 1 Seizure 1 Insurance denial 1 Others 3 Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Chen: genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Forman:Mustang Therapeutics: Research Funding. Cashen:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Blum:cephalon: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Fenske:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cheson:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Ascenta: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding. Smith:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Faham:adaptive biotech: Employment, Other: stockholders. Wilkins:adaptive biotech: Employment. Leonard:teva: Consultancy; genentech: Consultancy. Kahl:Genentech: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Ibrutinib-Lenalidomide-Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Final Results from the Nordic Lymphoma Group MCL6 (PHILEMON) Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 36-36
Author(s):  
Mats Jerkeman ◽  
Martin Hutchings ◽  
Riikka Räty ◽  
Karin Fahl Wader ◽  
Anna Laurell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: In spite of improvements in treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), this is still considered an incurable lymphoma entity, and the majority of patients eventually relapse. Ibrutinib is a very active agent in MCL, but in vitro has been shown to partially antagonize the activity of rituximab, by suppression of NK cell activity and subsequent ADCC. Lenalidomide, on the other hand, improves rituximab-induced ADCC. In this multi-centre open-label phase II trial, we evaluated safety and efficacy of this triplet combination in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. Methods: Patients with MCL, relapsing after or refractory to at least one rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimen, WHO PS 0-3, and measurable disease were eligible. The primary endpoint was maximal overall response rate (ORR) measured with CT and PET/CT. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by PCR was performed during follow-up, according to EuroMRD criteria. Ion Torrent sequencing of the most frequently mutated genes in MCL was performed on frozen tumor cells from bone marrow at time of relapse. Health-related quality of life was assessed by the EORTC-QLQ C30 questionnaire before and during treatment. Treatment schedule: Induction phase: Up to twelve 28-day cycles with: Lenalidomide 15 mg p o daily, days 1-21, Ibrutinib 560 mg p o days 1-28, Rituximab 375 mg/m2 i v day 1 in cycle 1, then 1400 mg s c (or 375 mg/m2i v) days 8, 15 and 22 in cycle 1, then day 1 in cycles 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11. Maintenance phase: For patients in CR, PR or SD, not in need of other treatment, given until progression, cycle duration 56 days. Ibrutinib: 560 mg p o days 1-56, 2. Rituximab 1400 mg s c (or 375 mg/m2i v) day 1 of each cycle. Results: Accrual of 50 pts was completed in June 2016, at 10 centres in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. The median age was 69.5 years, with a median MIPI score of 6.2. Patients had received a median of two previous regimens, four had progressed after single agent ibrutinib, and three had received prior allo-SCT. A TP53 mutation was detected in 11 of 49 evaluable cases (22%), 8 cases were of blastoid/pleomorphic histology, and 22 of 40 evaluable cases had a Ki67 &gt;30%. Treatment emergent-AEs of any grade in ≥20% of patients were rash (24%) and fatigue (20%). Five pts (10%) experienced rash grade 3, mainly during cycle 1. Hematological toxicity was generally of low grade, apart from grade 3-4 neutropenia in 5 patients. One patient died due to possible treatment-related toxicity (septic shock). In total, 27 patients achieved CR (54%) and 10 PR (20%). Among evaluable patients with a TP53 mutation, blastoid/pleomorphic histology or Ki67 &gt;30%, the CR rates were 7/11 (64%), 15/8 (62%) and 11/22 (50%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 40 months, the median PFS is 18 months (95% CI 6.5-28), and median OS 47 months (95% CI 30-64). Patients with a detectable TP53 mutation at relapse (n=11) had a median PFS of 13 months (95% CI 4.2-21), whereas pts without a TP53 mutation had a median PFS of 34 months (95% CI 8.3-60). Of the 28 patients evaluable for MRD at 6 months, 15/27 (56%) patients achieved molecular remission in blood and 12/28 (43%) in bone marrow. After 12 months, MRD-negativity in BM was 68% (13/19). Out of 4 patients with TP53-mutated MCL, 2 were MRD-negative in BM after 12 months, as well as 2 out of 4 patients with blastoid/pleomorphic histology. By self-reported HRQOL, a lower level of emotional functioning (EF), as well as a higher level of pain (PA) at baseline, was associated with inferior PFS. In addition, low EF was associated with inferior OS. By a Cox regression multivariable analysis, including MIPI, TP53, histology, Ki67, EF and PA, only MIPI was prognostic for PFS or OS with this regimen. Conclusions: The combination of ibrutinib, lenalidomide and rituximab has been shown to be an active and well tolerated regimen in this cohort of high risk R/R MCL, associated with a high rate of molecular remission. The activity in TP53 mutated MCL is lower than in unmutated disease, but this regimen may still serve as an option for a bridge to an allogeneic transplantation or CAR-T therapy in this category of patients. Disclosures Jerkeman: Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Hutchings:Genmab: Honoraria; Genmab: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Daiichi: Research Funding; Sankyo: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria.

Consolidation with High Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Improves Survival for Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2006-2006
Author(s):  
Loretta Nastoupil ◽  
Pareen J Shenoy ◽  
Alex Ambinder ◽  
Miray Seward ◽  
Ajay K. Nooka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Therapy ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract Abstract 2006 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) comprises 5–7% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomaand remains incurable with conventional chemotherapeutic approaches. Some clinical series and trials suggest that outcomes are improved with intensive induction containing cytarabine (Ara-C) and/or the use of high dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) once patients (pts) achieve remission. What is not apparent are the contributions of each and which prognostic factors influence outcomes. We examined our single center experience with initial management strategies for pts diagnosed with MCL between 1995 and 2011 and compared outcomes of CHOP±R (rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), an intensive induction regimen HCVAD±R (rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine) in patients who subsequently underwent observation or HDT/ASCT. Methods: To examine the effectiveness of CHOP±R, HCVAD±R and HDT/ASCT, and the contributions of each to overall survival (OS), we conducted an IRB-approved retrospective review of consecutive cases of MCL identified from our database. Responsesfollowing the first management strategy were retrospectively assessed using International Working Group Criteria (JCO 1999). Descriptive statistics for the baseline characteristics of pts who received CHOP±R and HCVAD±R were compared using Chi-square tests. Kaplan–Meier estimation was used to evaluate OS and the treatment regimens were compared with the log-rank test. Toevaluate prognostic factors and the effects of treatment on OS, Cox proportional hazards models were used controlling for sex, race, stage, presence of B-symptoms, MIPI score, and those who underwent consolidation with HDT/ASCT. Results: 103 ptswere identified with a median age of 58 (range 32–79 years), 27% were ≥65 years of age, 80% were male, 77% were white, 96% had an ECOG PS ≤1, 93% were advanced stage (III/IV), and the majority had a low risk MIPI score (53%). 43% (N=44) received CHOP±R (mean # of cycles 5.3, median 6, range 1–8) and the remaining 57% received HCVAD±R (N=59, mean # of cycles 4.5, median 4, range 1–12). 65% of HCVAD pts and 27% of CHOP pts received R. No significant differenceswere observed in the baseline characteristics of the two groups: age (59 years CHOP±R vs. 57 HCVAD±R, p=0.06), presence of B symptoms (32% vs. 31%, p=0.77), stage (III/IV, 91% vs. 95%, p=0.69), or MIPI score (low 50% vs. 56%, p=0.97). Of the pts who were consolidated with a transplant (N=47), median age was 58, 85% were male, 32% had B-symptoms, all had an ECOG PS ≤1, 26% had an LDH>ULN, 51% had a low MIPI, and 81% received HCVAD±R as induction. In comparison to those observed, the only significant differences were ECOG PS (8% ≥2, p=0.05) and induction regimen (63% CHOP±R, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in 5-year OS for CHOP±R: 64% (95% CI 44–79%) and HCVAD±R:68% (52–80%). There was a significant difference in 5-year OS for patients who underwent HDT/ASCT vs. those who did not consolidate with transplant (74% vs. 59%, p=0.03). 5-year OS for those treated with HCVAD±R + HDT/ASCT was not significantly different from the rest of the pts74% vs. 61% (p=0.19). After controlling for clinical confounders including sex, race, stage, presence of B-symptoms, consolidation with HDT/ASCT was associated with superior OS (HR 0.46 95% CI 0.22–0.93) while having a high MIPI score was associated with inferior OS (HR 3.79, 95% 1.59–9.01). Conclusions: Our single institution experience for untreated MCL pts demonstrates favorable 5-year OS independent of induction chemotherapy. Patients who underwent consolidation with HDT/ASCT had superior OS compared to those who did not. Disclosures: Flowers: Genentech/Roche (unpaid): Consultancy; Millennium (unpaid): Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Ibrutinib-Lenalidomide-Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: First Results from the Nordic Lymphoma Group MCL6 (PHILEMON) Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 148-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mats Jerkeman ◽  
Martin Hutchings ◽  
Riikka Räty ◽  
Karin Fahl Wader ◽  
Anna Laurell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: In spite of improvements in treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) over the last 10-15 years, this is still considered an incurable lymphoma entity, and the majority of patients eventually relapse. Ibrutinib is a very active agent in MCL, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 68% as a single agent in the relapse situation. In vitro, ibrutinib has been shown to partially antagonize the activity of rituximab, by suppression of NK cell activity and subsequent ADCC. Lenalidomide, on the other hand, improves rituximab-induced ADCC. In this multi-centre open-label phase II trial, we evaluated safety and efficacy of this triplet combination in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. A phase I trial with this combination has been performed in 22 patients with untreated follicular lymphoma (Alliance 051103). In this trial, rash was the most common adverse event (AE), occuring in 73% of pts, with grade 3 rash in 32%. Methods: Eligibility criteria were: patients with MCL, relapsing after or refractory to at least one rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimen, WHO PS 0-3, and measurable disease. The primary endpoint was maximal overall response rate (ORR) measured with CT and PET/CT. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by PCR was performed during follow-up, according to EuroMRD criteria. Ion Torrent sequencing was performed on frozen tumor cells from bone marrow at time of relapse, including the following genes: ATM, CCND1, TP53, KMT2D, NOTCH1, NOTCH2, WHSC1 and BIRC3. Treatment schedule: Induction phase: Up to twelve 28-day cycles with: Lenalidomide 15 mg p o daily, days 1-21, Ibrutinib 560 mg p o days 1-28, Rituximab 375 mg/m2 i v day 1 in cycle 1, then 1400 mg s c (or 375 mg/m2i v) days 8, 15 and 22 in cycle 1, then day 1 in cycles 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11. Maintenance phase: For patients in CR, PR or SD, not in need of other treatment. Given until progression, cycle duration 56 days. Ibrutinib: 560 mg p o days 1-56, 2. Rituximab 1400 mg s c (or 375 mg/m2i v) day 1 of each cycle. Results: Accrual of 50 pts was completed in 12 months, June 2016, at 10 centres in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. The median age was 69.5 years, with a median MIPI score of 6.2. Patients had received a median of two previous regimens, four had progressed after single agent ibrutinib, and three had received prior allo-SCT. In total, 17/50 pts have discontinued treatment (n=9 due to PD, n=4 due to AE, n=2 withdrew consent, n=1 proceeded to alloSCT and n=1 due to other cause). Treatment emergent-AEs of any grade in ≥20% of patients were rash (24%) and fatigue (20%). Five pts (10%) experienced rash grade 3, mainly during cycle 1. Hematological toxicity was generally of low grade, apart from grade 3-4 neutropenia in 5 patients. One patient died due to possible treatment-related toxicity (septic shock). One event of laboratory tumor lysis syndrome was reported, and two events of atrial fibrillation, without reduction or discontinuation of ibrutinib. With a median follow up time of 7 months, 29 patients were evaluable for efficacy as of July 14, 2016. The ORR to date is 83% with 12 patients achieving CR (41%) and 12 PR (41%). Median duration of response and PFS has not been reached. One of three evaluable patients with progression on single agent ibrutinib responded with a PR, with ongoing response at 9 months. Of the 13 patients evaluable for MRD at 6 months, 7/12 patients have achieved molecular remission in blood and 7/13 in bone marrow. Conclusions: So far, the combination of ibrutinib, lenalidomide and rituximab has been shown to be an active and well tolerated regimen in patients with R/R MCL, associated with molecular remission. Cutaneous toxicity was manageable, in contrast to what has been reported with a similar combination in untreated patients with follicular lymphoma. Up-dated results will be presented at the annual meeting, including data on mutational profile as biomarker for efficacy. This trial was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02460276. Disclosures Jerkeman: Gilead: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Niemann:Abbvie: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Geisler:Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Five-Year Outcomes of SWOG S1106: A Randomized Phase II US Intergroup Study of R-HCVAD Vs. R-Bendamustine Followed By Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1593-1593
Author(s):  
Manali Kamdar ◽  
Hongli Li ◽  
Robert W. Chen ◽  
Lisa M. Rimsza ◽  
Michael L. Leblanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Initial Management ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Introduction: The optimal initial management of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is unknown, but aggressive induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant confers long remission durations and is standard for younger patients. Cytarabine-based induction achieves higher rates of MRD-negativity compared to anthracycline-based induction regimens and correlates with improved outcomes. Whether a similar benefit exists after bendamustine-rituximab (RB) induction is unknown. S1106 compared induction R-HyperCVAD/MTX/ARAC (RH) or RB followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We previously reported similar 2-year (yr) progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with either regimen, and provocatively found that MRD negativity was similar with both regimens. RH was more toxic than RB and had higher stem cell mobilization failure rates. Methods: Inclusion criteria were untreated stage III, IV or bulky stage II MCL, Cyclin D1 +, age > 18-65, and adequate organ function. Randomization was stratified by MIPI. Patients (pts) received either 4 cycles of RH or 6 cycles of RB followed by ASCT. MRD was assessed at baseline and post induction. Extraction of genomic tumour DNA from paraffin embedded tissue or bone marrow aspirate and PCR amplification of IGH-VDJ, IGH-DJ, and IGK regions was performed followed by high-throughput sequencing to determine the tumor clonotype(s) (Adaptive Biotechnologies). DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and plasma was amplified and sequenced to determine lymphoma molecules per million diploid genomes. Herein we report the results of the updated analysis at a median follow-up (mFU) of 5 yrs. Results: Fifty-two of 53 pts were evaluable. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except for more female pts in the RH group. This study was closed based on prespecified criteria of stem cell mobilization failures in the RH arm. With mFU of 5 yrs (range, 29 days-6yrs), updated ORR (94.1% RH vs. 85.7% RB) and CR (41% RH vs. 43% RB) rates were similar. The 5-yr estimated PFS was 62% and 66% and the 5-yr estimated OS was 74% and 80% for RH and BR, respectively (Fig.1). Increased grade 3/4 toxicity and inadequate stem cell mobilization was seen in the RH arm thus challenging its use as an induction platform for future upfront MCL trials. 9/17 pts in RH and 23/35 pts in RB arm underwent ASCT. A landmark analysis was performed evaluating 5-yr PFS and 5-yr OS with and without ASCT in each arm. (Table 1) 27 patients consented to optional MRD assessment, with 12 paired serial samples (baseline and post induction). Overall, the estimated 5 yr PFS was 90% for all patients who achieved MRD negative status at the end of RB. Long-term toxicity included acute myeloid leukemia (N=1) in the RH arm at 5.4 yrs after diagnosis and lung cancer (n=1) in the RB arm at 2.9 yrs after diagnosis. Conclusion: The optimal induction regimen prior to ASCT in the initial management of MCL is a source of significant debate. Our initial findings supported RB as an effective platform with the ability to achieve MRD negativity. Long-term results of this study continue to demonstrate excellent response rates, 5-yr PFS and 5-yr OS with either RH or RB without any new toxicity signal. The 5-yr outcomes with RB compare favorably to more aggressive cytarabine-based induction regimens. Thus, R-Bendamustine could be an excellent backbone for induction therapy in transplant eligible patients and needs to be tested in larger phase III trials. Support: NIH/NCI grants CA180888, CA180819, CA180821, CA180820, and in part by Sequenta, Inc. (Adaptive Biotechnologies) Disclosures Kamdar: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy. Chen:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck & Co., Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech Inc.: Consultancy. Rimsza:NanoString: Other: Inventor on the patent for the Lymph2Cx assay. Barr:AbbVie, Gilead: Consultancy. Phillips:Genentech: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding. Leonard:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Sutro: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; United Therapeutics: Consultancy; Biotest: Consultancy. Kahl:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; CTI: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy. Friedberg:Bayer: Honoraria. Smith:Portola: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy.

scholarly journals The Intensity of the Induction Regimen Does Not Affect Post-Transplant Survival Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2915-2915
Author(s):  
Melhem Solh ◽  
Asad Bashey ◽  
Lawrence E Morris ◽  
H. Kent Holland ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine

Abstract The routine use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission have significantly improved outcomes for patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (Hermann et al, jco 2009). The choice of the most appropriate induction regimen prior to transplant remains a controversial topic. Adding high dose cytarabine to RCHOP among young patients (&lt;65 years) results in superior PFS, higher toxicity but no improvement in overall survival when compared to RCHOP alone (Hermine O et al, Lancet 2016). The use of bendamustine/Rituxan (BR) compared to RCHOP in 2 randomized studies showed lower toxicity, higher PFS but similar overall survival. In this study, we investigated the effect of induction regimen intensity and the use of high dose cytarabine on post autologous stem cell transplant outcomes among MCL patients treated at our center. 59 patients who received ASCT for MCL between 2010 and 2020 were included in this analysis. Data were retrieved from our database where it was entered prospectively. Median age at diagnosis was 60 (45,76) years, stage IV (85%), B symptoms (32%), MIPI score (low 17%, intermediate 47%, high 28%) and ECOG performance 0-1 (81%). Induction regimen included BR (n=14), RCHOP (n=11), R-Hyper CVAD (n=14), RBAC(n=2) and RCHOP/RDHAP (n=18). 85% of patients were in CR and 15% in PR at time of transplant. All patients underwent chemo mobilization with a median time from diagnosis to transplant of 251 (119,1372) days. 30 patients (51%) received post-transplant rituximab maintenance. Patients were compared into 2 groups based on the use of high dose cytarabine in their induction regimen (table 1). Patients who received high dose cytarabine were younger and had a shorter time from diagnosis to transplant that patients who were treated without cytarabine. Survival endpoints for cytarabine based and no cytarabine based induction at 5 years post-transplant were as follows OS (82% vs 69%), DFS (65% vs 50%), Non-relapse mortality (4% vs 9%) and relapse (31% vs 41%) respectively ( figure 1). A multivariable cox analysis for OS, DFS, NRM and relapse showed that cytarabine had no effect on any of the endpoints. For OS, B symptoms and worse ECOG performance at Diagnosis (&gt;=2) were associated with worse OS. For relapse, higher MIPI score and no use of Rituxan maintenance resulted in higher relapse. In conclusion, our data shows that among MCL patients receiving ASCT, the use of more intensive cytarabine based induction does not clearly improve long-term outcomes It is possible that use of ASCT compensates for the use of a less intense induction regimen. Disease (MIPI), Patient (ECOG)characteristics and use of post-transplant maintenance are factors that contribute to post transplant outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Solh: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Partner Therapeutics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding.

A Pilot Study of Acalabrutinib with Bendamustine/Rituximab Followed By Cytarabine/Rituximab (R-ABC) for Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Daniel Guy ◽  
Marcus Watkins ◽  
Fei Wan ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Amanda F Cashen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Introduction The management of younger fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) varies widely with no consensus on an optimal induction therapy. To date, the treatments with the longest progression-free survival incorporate a chemotherapy backbone that includes high dose cytarabine, followed by consolidation with an autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) (Hermine et al. Lancet 2016, Eskelund et al. Br J Haematol 2016). Recent data showed that a regimen of bendamustine/rituximab followed by cytarabine/rituximab achieved high complete response rates with high minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (Merryman RW et al. Blood Adv 2020). We hypothesized that adding the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor acalabrutinib to the same chemotherapeutic backbone would be safe and increase complete response rates as well as minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity pre-transplant, and potentially improve clinical outcomes. Methods We conducted a single arm, single institution pilot study registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03623373). Patients with untreated MCL, who were between ages 18-70 and were candidates for ASCT, were eligible. Patients received six 28-day cycles of treatment. Cycles 1-3 consisted of bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 and acalabrutinib 100mg BID on days 1 through 28. Cycles 4-6 consisted of rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, cytarabine 2 g/m2 (1.5 g/m2 if age&gt;60) q12 hours on days 1 and 2, and acalabrutinib 100mg BID on days 1 through 7 and 22 through 28. Restaging PET/CT and response assessment based on the Lugano classification were obtained following cycles 3 and 6. After cycle 6 patients underwent leukapheresis and stem-cell collection as preparation for ASCT. Blood for MRD status was collected after cycles 2, 4 and 6 and will be evaluated using the ClonoSeq assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies). The primary objective was to determine the stem cell mobilization success rate. Secondary objectives included safety and tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), pre-transplant complete response rate (CR), and the MRD negativity rate during and after completion of therapy. Results The trial enrolled 14 patients from December 2018 to February 2020. One patient withdrew consent prior to start of treatment and another was found to have an undiagnosed adenocarcinoma shortly after starting MCL treatment. Both are excluded from the analysis. The median age was 57 years (range 52-66). 11 patients were males (92%), all patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-1. 11 patients (92%) presented with stage IV disease. The mean MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) score was 6.3 (25% high-risk, 42% intermediate-risk and 33% low-risk). Of the 12 patients who began treatment, 9 completed all 6 cycles. Three patients did not complete therapy due to: insurance issues (n = 1), and thrombocytopenia (n = 2) following cycle 5 and 4. The side effect profile showed expected hematologic toxicities with grade 3-4 cytopenias in all patients, mostly during cytarabine cycles. In total, 100% of patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and 83% of patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia. Three episodes of febrile neutropenia were observed. One patient had a grade 3 transaminase increase, and one patient had grade 3 diarrhea. No bleeding events or treatment related deaths occurred. The remainder of the side effects were low grade and the treatment was generally well tolerated. Of the 12 evaluable patients, 10 responded (ORR 83%) with 9 achieving CR (75%). One patient achieved PR prior to being removed from the study due to thrombocytopenia and then achieved CR off study. Two patients experienced PD during induction. With a median follow up of 9 months, no responding patients have relapsed. The median CD34+ stem cell collection was 3.84x106 cells/kg (range 2.77 - 5.9). MRD results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions This is the first study attempting to combine BTK inhibition with a high dose cytarabine containing regimen. The addition of acalabrutinib to a regimen of bendamustine/rituximab followed by cytarabine/rituximab appears to be safe. The R-ABC combination will be further tested in the recently activated intergroup trial EA4181. Disclosures Bartlett: Autolus: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BTG: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Affimed Therapeutics: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Fehniger:ImmunityBio: Research Funding; HCW Biologics: Research Funding; Kiadis: Consultancy; Nkarta: Consultancy; Indapta: Consultancy; Wugen: Consultancy; Orca Biosystems: Consultancy; Compass Therapeutics: Research Funding. Ghobadi:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; EUSA: Consultancy; WuGen: Consultancy. Mehta-Shah:Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding; C4 Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Genetech/Roche: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy; Verastem: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Corvus: Research Funding. Kahl:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC: Consultancy; Roche Laboratories Inc: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Safety and Tolerability of Conatumumab in Combination with Bortezomib or Vorinostat in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1708-1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anas Younes ◽  
Mark Kirschbaum ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
Lorrin Yee ◽  
Jorge Romaguera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Death Receptor ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Refractory Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1708 Poster Board I-734 Conatumumab is an investigational, fully human, monoclonal antibody agonist of human death receptor 5 (DR5 [TRAIL receptor 2]) that activates caspases and triggers apoptosis in sensitive tumor cells. DR5 is expressed by a variety of lymphoma cell lines, and TRAIL receptor agonists have been shown to induce apoptosis in lymphoma cells and lymphoma xenografts. Bortezomib and vorinostat are active and approved agents in certain lymphoma subtypes. In addition, they enhance death receptor-mediated apoptosis in multiple tumor models. In this 2-part study, we evaluated conatumumab in combination with bortezomib or vorinostat to treat patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. The dose-escalation phase evaluated the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of conatumumab in combination with bortezomib or vorinostat; the dose-expansion phase was designed to estimate the efficacy of conatumumab plus bortezomib in pts with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Here we present data from the dose-escalation phase. Eligibility criteria included: relapsed or refractory low-grade lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), diffuse large cell lymphoma, or Hodgkin lymphoma; age ≥ 18 years; informed consent; ECOG performance status of 0 or 1; life expectancy of > 3 months; adequate organ function; no prior treatment with bortezomib or vorinostat; no evidence of CNS involvement by lymphoma; and no primary CNS lymphoma. Three to 6 pts were enrolled into 1 of 3 sequential dose cohorts (1.5, 5, or 15 mg/kg) of conatumumab administered intravenously every 3 weeks (on day 1 of every 21-day cycle) in combination with either bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 IV twice weekly for 2 weeks followed by a 10-day rest period) or vorinostat (400 mg orally daily). Endpoints included safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of conatumumab, pharmacokinetics (PK) of conatumumab, incidence of anti-conatumumab antibodies, and best tumor response (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]). CRs were confirmed by FDG-PET and bone marrow biopsy per Cheson criteria (2007). Monocyte DR5 occupancy by conatumumab was determined as an exploratory endpoint. As of July 9, 2009, 27 pts were enrolled and 23 received ≥1 dose of conatumumab: 3, 3, and 6 pts at 1.5, 5, and 15 mg/kg conatumumab + bortezomib; 7, 3, and 1 pt at 1.5, 5, and 15 mg/kg conatumumab + vorinostat. 15 pts were men; median (range) age was 53 (23 to 81) years; ECOG PS 0 = 65%, 1 = 26%, unknown = 9%; disease stage I = 4%, II = 4%, III = 39%, IV = 48%, unknown = 4%. Nine pts are still receiving treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) were: fatigue (13 pts), diarrhea (9 pts), constipation (8 pts), nausea (8 pts), thrombocytopenia (8 pts), headache (7 pts), anemia (5 pts), dizziness (5 pts), and peripheral neuropathy (5 pts). A total of 6 and 3 pts reported worst grade 3 and 4 AEs, respectively, with no apparent differences between the 2 drug combinations. There were 2 DLTs: grade 3 prolonged Qt at 1.5 mg/kg conatumumab + vorinostat and grade 4 pulmonary embolism at 15 mg/kg conatumumab + bortezomib. An MTD has not been reached. Anti-conatumumb antibodies have not been detected in any pt. After one dose of conatumumab at 1.5, 5, or 15 mg/kg after bortezomib or vorinostat, conatumumab exposures were slightly higher (< 2-fold) than those in the first-in-human monotherapy study, indicating minimal effect of bortezomib or vorinostat on PK of conatumumab. Two pts had a confirmed CR: 1 pt with diffuse large cell lymphoma (1.5 mg/kg vorinostat cohort) at day 97 and 1 pt with nodular sclerosis Hodgkin lymphoma (5 mg/kg vorinostat cohort) at day 169. Thirteen pts had stable disease as their best objective response, 10 of whom had tumor shrinkage (range [based on sum of nodal and extra-nodal at each visit], -1.74% to -68.24%]). Receptor occupancy data will be presented. The combination of conatumumab with either bortezomib or vorinostat did not result in an unacceptable rate of dose-limiting toxicities and showed preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity in pts with relapsed or refractory lymphoma. The expansion phase in pts with MCL treated with conatumumab plus bortezomib is currently enrolling. Disclosures Younes: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbott Oncology: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Allos Therapeutics : Consultancy; Gloucester Pharm: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Tiba Oncology: Consultancy; Trubion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Methylgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kirschbaum:Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Romaguera:Wyeth: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Goyal:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hsu:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hwang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gorski:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wong:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Beaupre:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

The VcR-CVAD Regimen Produces a High Complete Response Rate in Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): First Analysis of E1405 – A Phase II Study of VcR-CVAD with Maintenance Rituximab for MCL.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1661-1661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad S Kahl ◽  
Hailun Li ◽  
Mitchell R Smith ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
Elisabeth Paietta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1661 Poster Board I-687 Introduction One approach to improving outcomes in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) is to incorporate newer targeted agents into standard chemotherapy regimens. As the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Velcade‘) achieved a 33% response rate in relapsed MCL, we hypothesized that the incorporation of Velcade (Vc) into a modified R-hyperCVAD chemotherapy backbone would result in a high complete response rate (CR). The new regimen, VcR-CVAD, was tested for safety and efficacy in a phase II study within the Wisconsin Oncology Network (UW) and demonstrated a CR rate of 77% (Kahl, ASH 2008). To determine the safety and efficacy of this regimen in a cooperative group setting, we initiated E1405: a phase II study of VcR-CVAD with maintenance rituximab (MR) for untreated MCL. Methods Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, previously untreated MCL, PS 0-2, and adequate end organ function. The treatment plan included: Velcade 1.3 mg/m2 days 1 and 4, rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV over 3 hrs q 12 hrs X 6 doses days 1-3, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 48 hrs days 1-2, vincristine 1 mg IV day 3, dexamethasone 40 mg po days 1-4. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles and all patients received G-CSF support. Patients achieving SD, PR, or CR received MR administered as 4 weekly treatments every 6 months for 2 years (protocol therapy). Patients had an option to receive high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (off protocol) rather than MR. The primary endpoint of the trial was the CR rate, incorporating PET imaging, to VcR-CVAD induction therapy. Results Seventy-six eligible patients were enrolled between 5/07 and 10/08. Baseline characteristics include median age 62 (40-76), 59M:17F, 91% stage III/IV, and 39% with elevated LDH. Sixty-four patients (84%) completed VcR-CVAD induction therapy. Reasons for treatment discontinuation included PD (1), toxicity (4), patient preference (2), and other/unknown (5). Response information is available on 74 patients while data is outstanding on 2 patients. The ORR was 96% (73/76; 95% CI, 89%-99%), CR rate 75% (57/76; 95% CI, 64%-84%) and the PR rate 21% (16/76; 95% CI, 13%-32%). Six of the PR patients were coded as such because of protocol violations in which a post-treatment bone marrow biopsy or PET scan was not obtained. The CR rate in the 68 completely restaged patients was 84%. Forty-four patients proceeded to planned MR while 21 patients went off protocol to SCT consolidation. Median follow up is currently too short (9 months) to assess PFS and OS. The major toxicity of the treatment regimen was expected myelosuppression. Grade 3-4 non hematologic toxicities were rare. No patients developed grade 3-4 neuropathy. There were no treatment related deaths. Conclusion The VcR-CVAD induction produced high overall response (96%) and CR rate (75%) in a representative MCL patient population treated on a cooperative group protocol. The CR rate was high and comparable to the UW pilot study (77%). No episodes of severe painful peripheral neuropathy were reported using the reduced vincristine dosage and the overall toxicity profile was very acceptable. Longer follow up is needed to determine if the high CR rate will translate into improved PFS and OS. Disclosures Kahl: Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bortezomib as front line treatment in MCL. Smith:Genentech: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Advani:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Horning:Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding.

A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2719-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2719 Poster Board II-695 Background: Rituximab directly targets CD20 positive lymphoma cells while lenalidomide targets the microenvironment. This combination was proven effective in vitro and in vivo in mantle cell lymphoma (Wu et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008; Zhang et al, Am J Hematol 2009). Clinically, lenalidomide (Habermann et al, Br J Haematol 2009) and rituximab have single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and may be an effective combination. The goal of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1 and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in phase 2. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle, and rituximab (375 mg/m2) weekly during cycle 1. Dose escalation was used to determine the MTD with lenalidomide (10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic, or grade 4 hematologic adverse events in cycle 1. Phase 2 has reached targeted enrolment with 45 patients treated at MTD. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival rate and response duration. Median time to event in months with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Of 45 patients treated at the MTD, the median age was 66 (46–85), 91% were males. All patients had received prior rituximab and were enrolled regardless of prior rituximab sensitivity or resistance. Results: The median follow-up time for the censored observations was 11.4 months. Two DLTs occurred at 25 mg in phase 1 (hypercalcemia, non-neutropenic fever); therefore, the MTD was 20 mg. The grade 3–4 non-hematologic events included elevated AST, elevated ALT, fatigue, myalgia, tremors, ataxia, cough, deep vein thrombosis, dyspnea, edema (facial), infection, neuropathy sensory, rash, and respiratory failure. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (37 events), neutropenic fever (4 events), and thrombocytopenia (16 events). There were no responses in patients treated at 10 mg or 15 mg. Thirty six patients (36) were evaluable for response. Nine (9) patients are too early in their treatment and are not yet eligible for response evaluation. Among the 36 evaluable patients, 11 (31%) patients achieved CR, 8 (22%) patients achieved PR, 3 (8%) patients had minor response, 6 (17%) patients had stable disease and 8 (22%) patients had progressive mantle cell lymphoma. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 53%. Seventy eight (78%) patients achieved stable disease or better and benefited from oral Lenalidomide plus 4 doses of rituximab. The median time to response was 2 months (2–8), and the median duration of response for the 19 patients with CR or PR was 18 months (95% CI: 10.6, NA) (range1–30 months). The median progression free survival for all patients on phase 2 was 14 months (95% CI: 9.8, NA) (ranging from 1–32 months). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in relapsed/refractory MCL with a favourable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Wang: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagemeister:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Samaniego:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Yi:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Knight:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document