Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence Among Rivaroxaban Treated Patients Who Continued Versus Discontinued Therapy: Analyses Among VTE Patients

Abstract Background: The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines for venous thromboembolism (VTE) disease recommend treatment with anticoagulation for at least 3 months in patients with VTE. Moreover, the EINSTEIN-extension study assessed the effect of rivaroxaban on the risk of VTE recurrences in patients who had completed 6 to 12 months of treatment for VTE. Results showed that rivaroxaban significantly reduced the risk of VTE recurrences with a small increased risk of major bleeding. The objective of this study was to assess the risk of VTE recurrences and major bleeding associated with extended rivaroxaban treatment in a real-world setting among all VTE patients (i.e., unprovoked, provoked, and cancer related). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Databases from 02/2011 to 04/2015. The study included adult patients who initiated rivaroxaban therapy within 7 days after their first VTE and continuously used rivaroxaban for at least 3 months. The end of the initial 3-month rivaroxaban treatment was defined as the index date and patients were categorized into discontinued (treatment ended) and continued cohorts. Patients were followed from index date until end of continuous treatment for the continued cohort or end of data or re-initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy for the discontinued cohort. The outcomes included VTE recurrences identified as a primary diagnosis documented during a hospitalization and major bleeding events identified by a validated algorithm (Cunningham et al., 2011). Kaplan-Meier rates for VTE recurrences and major bleeding events at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the index date were compared between cohorts with adjustment for baseline confounding using the inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) method based on propensity score. Patients with unprovoked VTEs, defined as not having recent surgery, cancer, pregnancy or estrogen therapy, were also evaluated. Sample sizes of patients with provoked VTEs and cancer were too small to analyze these populations. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted among VTE patients receiving rivaroxaban for at least 6 months. Results: Among the 3-month treatment population, a total of 5,933 (63.4% unprovoked VTE) and 1,536 (68.4% unprovoked VTE) rivaroxaban users formed the continued and discontinued cohorts, respectively. The mean (SD) observation period was 149.3 (124.4) days in the continued cohort and 211.1 (191.6) days in the discontinued cohort. The Kaplan-Meier analysis (Figure 1) showed that patients in the continued cohort had significantly lower rates of VTE recurrences after an additional 3 months (0.70% vs. 1.70%), 6 months (1.41% vs. 2.34%), 9 months (1.82% vs. 3.01%), and 12 months (1.97% vs. 3.01%; all p-values < 0.05) of treatment. No statistically significant differences in the cumulative event rates for major bleeding (Figure 2) were observed between the continued and the discontinued cohort at 3 months (0.58% vs. 0.82%), 6 months (0.91% vs. 0.88%), 9 months (1.33% vs. 1.18%), and 12 months (1.44% vs. 1.44%; all p-values > 0.05). Among the 6-month treatment population, a total of 2,676 (65.9% unprovoked VTE) and 1,127 (70.4% unprovoked VTE) rivaroxaban users formed the continued and discontinued cohorts, respectively. The mean (SD) observation period was 158.5 (130.6) days in the continued cohort and 206.5 (171.5) days in the discontinued cohort. Patients in the continued cohort had lower rates of VTE recurrences after an additional 3 months (0.82% vs. 1.41%), 6 months (1.22% vs. 2.69%), 9 months (1.35% vs. 3.02%), and 12 months (1.72% vs. 3.70%; except at 3 months all p-values < 0.05) of treatment. No differences in the cumulative event rates for major bleeding were observed between the continued and the discontinued cohorts. Similar results were found among patients with unprovoked VTE for the 3- and 6-month analyses. The interaction term between the cohort variable (Continued vs. Discontinued) and the type of VTE (unprovoked vs. other types of VTE) was non-significant in both populations (p-value > 0.05), which suggests that the benefit of extended treatment do not depend on the type of VTE events. Conclusions: Our study results suggest that all patients with VTE who continued rivaroxaban therapy after the first 3-month and 6-month treatment periods had significantly lower risk of VTE recurrences without an increased risk of major bleeding. Disclosures Khorana: Halozyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Berger:AZ: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wells:BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Itreas: Other: Served on a Writing Committee; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Other: Speaker Fees and Advisory Board. Seheult:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy. Ashton:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment. Laliberté:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Crivera:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lejeune:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Schein:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Own in excess of $10,000 of J&J stock. Wildgoose:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lefebvre:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Kaatz:Bristol Myer Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Association of Bleeding Severity with Mortality with in-Hospital and Extended Thromboprophylaxis in the Medically Ill in the Magellan Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122930 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2441-2441

Author(s):

Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽

Gary E. Raskob ◽

Alexander T Cohen ◽

Walter Ageno ◽

Jeffrey I. Weitz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Bayer Healthcare ◽

Equity Ownership

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common after hospitalization in acutely ill medical patients, yet extended thromboprophylaxis has not been widely implemented due to concerns about bleeding. The MAGELLAN study (NCT00571649) evaluated whether rivaroxaban (10 mg QD for 35±4 days) compared with enoxaparin (40 mg QD for 10±4 days) followed by placebo could prevent asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, and VTE-related death. Through Day 35, rivaroxaban was superior to enoxaparin/placebo in the modified intent-to-treat population (4.4% vs 5.7%, RR 0.77, 95%CI, 0.62 to 0.96, p=0.02), but there was an increase in clinically relevant bleeding, the composite of major and non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding (4.1% vs 1,7%, RR 2.5, 95%CI 1.85-3.25, p<0.001). Although major bleeding has been associated with increased mortality, the relationship between NMCR bleeding and all-cause mortality (ACM) is not established. We hypothesized that subjects in the MAGELLAN trial with major bleeding but not those with NMCR bleeding, would be at an increased risk of ACM irrespective of treatment group. Methods: We evaluated all bleeding events in subjects taking at least one dose of study drug from randomization until 2 days after the last dose (safety population) and their association with ACM through the Day 90 visit in 3 mutually exclusive groups: (1) subjects with no major or NMCR bleeding; (2) subjects whose first event was NMCR bleeding; and (3) subjects whose first event was major bleeding. Subjects only developing minimal or trivial bleeding were grouped with those who had no clinically relevant bleeding. Using a Cox proportional hazards model that included the bleeding group variable and baseline covariates significantly associated with ACM at p<0.05 (age, BMI, history of cancer, history of anemia, inflammatory disease, acute ischemic stroke, and acute respiratory insufficiency), we compared the risk of ACM in subjects with and without bleeding events. Results: The incidence of ACM for subjects who had NMCR bleeding was numerically higher but not significantly increased compared with subjects with no bleeding (20/176, 11.4% vs 468/7763, 6.0%, HR 1.41 95%CI 0.88, 2.25, p=0.151), while subjects with major bleeding were at a significantly increased risk of death (28/59, 47.5% vs 468/7763, 6.0%, HR 7.74 95%CI 5.16, 11.59, p<0.0001). Results of landmark analyses from the first bleeding event or end of treatment + 2 days to ACM for the three groups are displayed (Figure). Limitations: This analysis was post hoc and may have been underpowered to detect differences in ACM associated with NMCR bleeding. Conclusion: Major bleeding was associated with a significantly increased risk of ACM but NMCR bleeding was not. This suggests that a modest increase in NMCR bleeding associated with extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban may be acceptable to prevent VTE. Strategies to better select patients at lower risk of bleeding may improve the benefit risk profile of extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban. Disclosures Spyropoulos: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; ATLAS (Colorado Prevention Center): Consultancy; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy. Raskob:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Tetherex: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Anthos: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Consultancy. Cohen:Boston Scientific: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GLG: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; ACI Clinical: Consultancy; Aspen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; McKinsey: Consultancy; Navigant: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Temasek Capital: Consultancy; TRN: Consultancy; UK Government Health Select Committee: Other: advised the UK Government Health Select Committee, the all-party working group on thrombosis, the Department of Health, and the NHS, on the prevention of VTE; Lifeblood: Other: advisor to Lifeblood: the thrombosis charity and is the founder of the European educational charity the Coalition to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism. Ageno:Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference and travel support; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: research support,travel support ; BMS Pfizer: Other: travel support; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Weitz:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spiro:Bayer U.S. LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lu:Janssen R&D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lipardi:Janssen Research and Develompent: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barnathan:Janssen Research and Development LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: Rivaroxaban is a Factor Xa inhibitor. It is currently under review by FDA for approval as thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

Download Full-text

Safety of Anticoagulant Therapies for Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1178.1178 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1178-1178 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Michael Streiff ◽

Dejan Milentijevic ◽

Keith McCrae ◽

Daniel Yannicelli ◽

Jonathan Fortier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Control Cohort ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Introduction: Anticoagulation is effective for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients, but it is also associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Previous clinical trials (e.g., CLOT and CATCH) of LMWH and warfarin for the treatment of VTE in cancer patients reported major bleeding in 3% to 6% of treated patients. The objective of this observational study was to compare the risk of major bleeding in cancer patients treated with anticoagulants for VTE in a real world setting. Methods: Medical and pharmacy claims from the Humana Database from 1/1/2013 to 05/31/2015 were analyzed. Newly diagnosed cancer patients with a first VTE diagnosis occurring after their first cancer diagnosis, and with ≥1 dispensing of an anticoagulant within 7 days after their VTE diagnosis, were selected. Based on the first anticoagulant received, patients were classified into one of the following cohorts: LMWH, warfarin, and rivaroxaban (other agents not included due to low utilization). Inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity score were used to adjust for differences between treatment cohorts for the following comparisons: LMWH vs. rivaroxaban, LMWH vs. warfarin, and rivaroxaban vs. warfarin. Patients were followed up until the earliest event, either treatment non-persistence (gap > 60 days between the end of the days of supply of a dispensing and the start date of the next dispensing), or end of data availability. Major bleeding events were identified using validated criteria (Cunningham et al., 2011). Kaplan-Meier rates at 3 and 6 months and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the risk of bleeding between different treatment cohorts. To better understand the risk of major bleeding in cancer patients unrelated to anticoagulation, a cohort of patients with cancer who did not have VTE and did not receive an anticoagulant was added as a control cohort. Results: A total of 2,428 patients (LMWH: n=660; warfarin: n=1,061; rivaroxaban: n=707) were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced among treatment cohorts. Median duration of therapy with LMWH was shorter than rivaroxaban (1.0 vs. 3.0 months, p<.0001) and warfarin (1.0 vs. 3.5 months, p<.0001). Rates of major bleeding for LMWH and rivaroxaban were 8.3% and 8.2%, respectively at 6 months with a hazard ratio (HRs [95% CI]) of 1.03 (0.64-1.65; Figure 1A). In the comparison between LMWH and warfarin cohorts, major bleeding rates were 8.5% and 8.6%, respectively at 6 months with hazard ratio (HRs [95% CI]) of 1.04 (0.69-1.57; Figure 1B). The risk of major bleeding was also similar for rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts, 9.0% and 8.7%, respectively at 6 months with a hazard ratio (HR [95% CI]) of 1.01 (0.71-1.43; Figure 1C). For the control cohort of cancer patients without VTE and not receiving anticoagulation median follow-up was 5.6 months. Rates of major bleeding events for the control cohort were 2.6% and 4.2 % at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Conclusion: This real world study of cancer patients treated for VTE found that the risk of major bleeding was similar for the 3 most widely prescribed anticoagulants in current clinical practice: LMWH, warfarin, and rivaroxaban. The observed rates of major bleeding were generally higher than what has been reported for LMWH and warfarin in the CLOT and CATCH trials. Patient characteristics such as older age (average age 73 years) could have contributed to the higher major bleeding rate seen in this study compared to the CLOT and CATCH trials, respectively. Figure 1 Rates of Major Bleeding Events LMWH vs. rivaroxaban cohorts Figure 1. Rates of Major Bleeding Events. / LMWH vs. rivaroxaban cohorts Figure 2 LMWH vs. warfarin cohorts Figure 2. LMWH vs. warfarin cohorts Figure 3 rivaroxaban vs. warfarin cohorts Figure 3. rivaroxaban vs. warfarin cohorts Disclosures Streiff: Portola: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding. Milentijevic:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. McCrae:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yannicelli:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fortier:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nelson:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Laliberté:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Crivera:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lefebvre:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Schein:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Own in excess of $10,000 of J&J stock. Khorana:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Halozyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Reduced Costs and Length-of-Stay Associated with Rivaroxaban As Compared to Parenteral Bridging and Warfarin in Pulmonary Embolism Patients Managed in Observation Status

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2337.2337 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2337-2337

Author(s):

Christine G Kohn ◽

Erin R Weeda ◽

W Frank Peacock ◽

Gregory J Fermann ◽

Christopher W. Baugh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pulmonary Embolism ◽

New Jersey ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hospital Costs ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Hospital Treatment ◽

Total Hospital ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Observation stays are intended to assess patients for short periods (i.e., <2-midnights) to determine need for inpatient admission or discharge. Unlike rivaroxaban, treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) with parenteral bridging to warfarin requires frequent coagulation monitoring and dosing adjustments that may prolong length-of-stay (LOS) and increase hospital treatment costs. Objective: To compare LOS, hospital treatment costs, and readmissions in PE patients managed through observation stays treated with either rivaroxaban or parenterally-bridged warfarin. Methods: US Premier Hospital claims data spanning 11/2012-9/2015 was used to identify patients with a primary diagnosis code for PE (415.1x) managed through an observation stay and having ³1 claim for a PE-related diagnostic test on day 0-2. Rivaroxaban users, allowing ²2 days of prior parenteral therapy, were 1:1 propensity-score matched to patients parenterally bridged to warfarin. LOS, the proportion of encounters lasting >2-midnights, total hospital costs and risk of readmission for venous thromboembolism (VTE) or major bleeding during the same month or 2 months subsequent to the index event were compared between propensity-score-matched treatment cohorts. Results: A total of 401 rivaroxaban patients were matched to 401 patients receiving parenteral bridging to warfarin.Rivaroxaban use was associated with a shorter LOS (-0.25 days), fewer encounters lasting >2 midnights (21.1% vs. 32.7%) and lower total hospital costs (-$240) vs. parenteral bridging to warfarin (p²0.03 for all) (Table). Readmission was similar between cohorts (p>0.99 for both VTE and major bleeding readmission). Conclusion: Shorter LOS and lower hospital costs occurred with rivaroxaban vs. parenteral bridging to warfarin in PE observation stay patients. This was achieved without increasing short-term risk of VTE or major bleeding readmission. Table Table. Disclosures Peacock: Portola: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fermann:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding. Baugh:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche Diagnostics: Other: Advisory Board. Wells:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Other: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Itreas: Other: Writing Committee. Ashton:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment. Crivera:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wildgoose:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schein:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Own in excess of $10,000 of J&J stock. Coleman:Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Pharmaceuticals AG: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Bleeding Incidence Among Patients With Venous Thromboembolism: A Large US Insurance Database Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2916.2916 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2916-2916 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Xianchen Liu ◽

Lin Xie ◽

Hemant Phatak ◽

Jack Mardekian ◽

Wilson Tan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Disease ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Employment Equity ◽

History Of ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Insurance Database

Abstract Introduction It is crucial to assess clinical benefit and bleeding risk when selecting an anticoagulant for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study examined the incidence of major bleeding and non-major bleeding and clinical predictors of major bleeding among patients with VTE in the usual clinical practice setting. Methods VTE patients aged ≥18 years were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan commercial or Medicare supplemental insurance database. Index date was defined as the first VTE diagnosis between 07/01/2006 – 12/31/2011. Patients were required to have ≥2 VTE outpatient diagnoses within a 3-week window or have 1 VTE diagnosis in an inpatient setting, have a continuous health plan enrollment for 6 months prior to the index date (baseline), and have no VTE diagnosis in the baseline period. Major bleeding was defined as any bleeding that resulted in hospitalization or blood transfusion; all other bleeds were non-major bleeding. Patients were followed until major bleeding/non-major bleeding, death, disenrollment, or end of study. Multivariate Cox regression was used to examine factors associated with major bleeding. Results Of 267,655 eligible patients, 182,972 patients were with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) only (68.4%), 69,169 with pulmonary embolism (PE) only (25.8%); and 15,514 with both (5.8%). Mean age was 61.5 years, and 53.1% were female. Mean follow-up period was 17.3 months (median=12.1). The annual incidence of major bleeding and non-major bleeding were 3.9% and 20.1%, respectively. The median time to major bleeding from index VTE diagnosis was 2.2 months. Major risk factors at baseline for major bleeding (Risk increase>20%) were history of major bleeding (HR=10.78, 95%CI=10.30-11.28) and non-major bleeding (HR=1.61, 95%CI=1.54-1.68), chemotherapy (HR=1.27, 95%CI=1.20-1.35), age ≥65 vs.≤40 years (HR=1.27, 95%CI=1.18-1.37), alcohol abuse (HR=1.26, 95%CI=1.16-1.38), cancer (HR=1.25, 95%CI=1.19-1.31), and heart disease (HR=1.23, 95%CI=1.18-1.28) (Table). Baseline hormone therapy (HR=0.74, 95%CI=0.68-0.80) and pregnancy (HR=0.59, 95%CI=0.46-0.74) were associated with reduced risk for major bleeding. Conclusions Major and non-major bleeding were common in patients with VTE. Multiple factors, especially history of bleeding, age≥65 years, alcohol abuse, cancer and heart disease, were associated with increased risk for major bleeding. Further research needs to examine bleeding risk associated with anticoagulant therapy. Disclosures: Liu: Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Xie:StatInMed: Employment, Research Funding. Phatak:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mardekian:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tan:Pfizer: Employment, Equity Ownership. Baser:StatInMed: Employment, Research Funding. Ramacciotti:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Predictors of Major Bleeding in Patients with First Venous Thromboembolism Treated with Vitamin K Antagonists in Clinical Practice in the United Kingdom

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2327.2327 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2327-2327

Author(s):

Alexander T Cohen ◽

Christopher Wallenhorst ◽

Anja Katholing ◽

Melissa Hamilton ◽

Sreevalsa Unniachan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Vitamin K Antagonists ◽

Medical Illness ◽

Treatment Episode ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

History Of ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Active Cancer

Abstract Introduction: The management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the prevention of recurrent VTE consists of anticoagulation primarily with Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA). The main adverse effect of anticoagulation is bleeding. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of major bleeding in patients with first VTE treated with VKA. Methods: A cohort study was undertaken using the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink with additional data from hospitalizations and causes of death. Patients with incident first VTE between 2008-2013 treated with VKA, i.e. starting VKA treatment within 60 days after first VTE, were included in the cohort. Major bleeding was defined in accordance with the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis recommendations comprising fatal bleeds, bleeds at a critical site, and bleeding events in association with anemia or blood transfusions. Patients were followed until the end of the first VKA treatment episode. Hazard ratios of potential predictors for major bleeding during the first VKA treatment episode were estimated from Cox regression models which included recognized predictors for major bleeding before the diagnosis of VTE, and a list of potential predictors during VKA treatment. Results: Among 10,118 VKA-treated VTE patients the incidence rate of major bleeding was 2.6 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.2-3.1) per 100 person-years (145 major bleeds during 5,548 person-years of VKA use). Among baseline characteristics, predictors for major bleeding (Table) included increasing age, and history of a major bleeding and of a non-major clinically relevant bleeding. Furthermore the following events after the first VTE (80 of 145 cases) were also associated with an increased risk of major bleeding: non-major clinically relevant bleeding, HR 2.88 (95% CI, 1.85 - 4.46), active cancer 4.13 (2.48-6.89), trauma 14.05 (7.96-24.82), surgery 3.27 (1.29-8.28), and medical illness 3.03 (1.87-4.90). Additional predictors for major bleeding were new onset or history of moderate/severe liver disease, 7.44 (2.93-18.92), or renal disease, 1.73 (1.19-2.52). Conclusions: Assessment for and awareness of these predictors prior to and during VKA treatment is needed to prevent major bleeding events. Caution is warranted in patients with these independent risk factors. Table 1. Association between factors at first VTE and during VKA treatment and major bleeding Incident major bleeding after first VTE n (%) Crude hazard ratio (95%-CI) Adjusted hazard ratio (95%-CI) Total 145 (100) Age1 <60 26 (17.93) 1 1 60-69 31 (21.38) 2.03 (1.21 - 3.42) 1.83 (1.07 - 3.14) 70-79 39 (26.90) 2.56 (1.56 - 4.21) 2.19 (1.27 - 3.76) 80+ 49 (33.79) 4.52 (2.81 - 7.28) 3.28 (1.90 - 5.68) Gender Female 72 (49.66) 0.98 (0.71 - 1.35) 0.89 (0.63 - 1.25) Type of first VTE DVT 82 (56.55) 1 1 PE 63 (43.45) 0.91 (0.65 - 1.27) 0.78 (0.56 - 1.09) History of bleeding prior to first VTE Non-major clinically relevant 56 (38.62) 2.09 (1.48 - 2.95) 1.75 (1.23 - 2.49) Major bleeding 13 (8.97) 4.47 (2.48 - 8.05) 3.17 (1.73 - 5.80) Prevalence of prior events at the day of the first VTE (duration of exposure) Active cancer (90 days) 14 (9.66) 2.07 (1.20 - 3.60) 0.75 (0.37 - 1.50) Non-active cancer 14 (9.66) 1.40 (0.81 - 2.43) 0.75 (0.42 - 1.37) Trauma (90 days) 11 (7.59) 1.01 (0.54 - 1.86) 1.09 (0.58 - 2.04) Inpatient surgery (90 days) 13 (8.97) 1.00 (0.57 - 1.77) 0.90 (0.48 - 1.68) Medical illness (90 days) 11 (7.59) 1.14 (0.62 - 2.11) 0.71 (0.35 - 1.42) Liver disease Mild 4 (2.76) 1.62 (0.60 - 4.38) 1.15 (0.42 - 3.17) Moderate/severe 5 (3.45) 6.80 (2.78 - 16.64) 7.44 (2.93 - 18.92) Renal disease 50 (34.48) 2.60 (1.84 - 3.66) 1.73 (1.19 - 2.52) Bleeding after first VTE Non-major clinically relevant 27 (18.62) 3.91 (2.55 - 5.99) 2.88 (1.85 - 4.46) Events after first VTE (duration of exposure) Active cancer (90 days) 32 (22.07) 4.76 (3.19 - 7.10) 4.13 (2.48 - 6.89) Trauma (14 days) 14 (9.66) 16.63 (9.49 - 29.12) 14.05 (7.96 - 24.82) Inpatient surgery (14 days) 5 (3.45) 5.79 (2.33 - 14.37) 3.27 (1.29 - 8.28) Medical illness (90 days) 24 (16.55) 3.24 (2.06 - 5.10) 3.03 (1.87 - 4.90) Disclosures Cohen: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jannsen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boeheringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hamilton:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Unniachan:BMS: Employment, Equity Ownership. Martinez:Bayer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Merz Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Association of Bleeding Severity with Mortality with Extended Thromboprophylaxis in the Medically Ill in the Mariner Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122621 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3669-3669

Author(s):

Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽

Walter Ageno ◽

Gregory W. Albers ◽

C. Gregory Elliott ◽

Jonathan L. Halperin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Medical Patients ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Bayer Healthcare ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Prevention Center

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common after hospitalization in acutely ill medical patients, yet extended thromboprophylaxis has not been widely implemented due to concerns about bleeding. The MARINER study (NCT02111564) compared thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban (10mg daily or 7.5mg daily in subjects with creatinine clearance 30-<50ml/min at baseline) vs placebo for 45 days beyond hospital discharge to prevent symptomatic VTE in acutely ill medical patients while reducing bleeding events through patient selection (Spyropoulos AC et al NEJM 2018). Rivaroxaban did not significantly lower the composite of symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death but reduced symptomatic VTE (0.18% vs 0.42%, p=0.023). While major bleeding (MB) was infrequent in both study groups (0.28% vs 0.15% with rivaroxaban vs. placebo, p=0.124), there was more non-major clinically relevant bleeding (NMCRB) with rivaroxaban (1.42% vs 0.85%, HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.17-2.35, p=0.004). Although MB has been associated with increased mortality, the relationship between NMCRB and all-cause mortality (ACM) is not established. We hypothesized that subjects in the MARINER trial with MB but not those with NMCRB would be at an increased risk of ACM irrespective of treatment group. Methods: We evaluated all bleeding events in subjects taking at least one dose of study drug from randomization until 2 days after the last dose (safety population) and their association with ACM through the Day 75 visit in 3 mutually exclusive groups: (1) subjects with no MB or NMCRB; (2) subjects whose first event was NMCRB; and (3) subjects whose first event was MB. Subjects only developing minimal or trivial bleeding were grouped with those who had no bleeding. Using a Cox proportional hazards model that included the bleeding group variable and baseline covariates that were significantly associated with ACM at p<0.05 (age, sex, history of VTE, history of anemia), we compared the risk of ACM in subjects with and without bleeding events. Results: The incidence of ACM among subjects who had a NMCRB was not increased over that in subjects without bleeding (2/136, 1.5% vs 218/11800, 1.8%, HR 0.41 95%CI 0.10, 1.67, p=0.213), while those experiencing MB had a higher incidence of death (4/26, 15.4% vs 218/11800, 1.8%, HR 3.43 95%CI 1.23, 9.54, p=0.018). Results of landmark analyses from the first bleeding event or end of treatment + 2 days to ACM for the three groups are displayed (Figure). Limitations: This analysis was post hoc and the MARINER trial excluded subjects at a high risk of bleeding. Conclusion: Although few subjects had MB events, those who did had an increased risk of ACM, while those who had NMCRB events did not. This suggests that the modest increase in NMCRB in trials of extended thromboprophylaxis may be an acceptable tradeoff to prevent VTE. Disclosures Spyropoulos: Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy; ATLAS (Colorado Prevention Center): Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Ageno:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: research support,travel support ; BMS Pfizer: Other: travel support; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference and travel support; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Albers:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy. Elliott:Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; University of Cincinnati: Honoraria; Spectrum Health: Honoraria; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy. Halperin:Ortho-McNeil-Janssen: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; ATLAS (Colorado Prevention Center): Consultancy; NIH: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy. Hiatt:Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy; NIH: Research Funding; Janssen R&D, LLD: Consultancy. Maynard:Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy. Steg:Novartis: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amarin: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy. Weitz:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria. Spiro:Bayer U.S. LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lu:Janssen R&D, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sugarmann:Janssen Research and Development LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lipardi:Janssen Research and Develompent: Employment, Equity Ownership. Raskob:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tetherex: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Anthos: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen R&D, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria; Portola: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Honoraria. Barnathan:Janssen Research and Development LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: Rivaroxaban is a Factor Xa inhibitor. The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban post-hospitalization in subjects with an acute medical illness as thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Second Primary Malignancies in Lenalidomide-Treated Patients with IPSS Low- or Int-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1704.1704 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1704-1704 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

Azra Raza ◽

Alan F. List ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Bouchra Benettaib ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Prior History ◽

Second Primary ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Increased Risk ◽

History Of ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Abstract 1704 Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) is approved in the US for the treatment of RBC transfusion-dependent patients with IPSS Low- or Int-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with del(5q), with or without other cytogenetic abnormalities. In a phase 3 trial, treatment with LEN 5 mg and 10 mg resulted in RBC transfusion independence (TI) for ≥ 26 weeks in 43% and 56% of such patients, cytogenetic response in 25% and 50%, and a significant improvement of health-related quality of life (p <.05 for both 5 mg and 10 mg). Achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks was associated with a significantly reduced risk of AML progression and death (p <.05 for both) (Fenaux P et al. Blood 2011;doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330126). In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, results of phase 3 trials showed a numerical imbalance in the occurrence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) between patients treated with LEN (in combination with melphalan or immediately after high-dose melphalan therapy and stem cell transplantation) and control cohorts. SPMs were analyzed in clinical trials of LEN across indications, including MDS. Methods: This was a single arm analysis of SPM data retrieved from RBC transfusion-dependent patients with IPSS Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with or without del(5q) who received LEN as monotherapy in 5 studies (MDS-001, -002, -003, -004, and -007). The cutoff date was February 28, 2011. SPMs were defined using MedDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) categories of invasive SPMs (hematologic malignancies and solid tumors) and non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is considered part of the natural history of disease progression in MDS. Although further follow-up is needed, results of a phase 3 study showed no obvious evidence for an increased risk of AML progression in LEN-treated RBC transfusion-dependent patients with IPSS Low- or Int-1-risk MDS and del(5q) (Fenaux P et al. Blood 2011;doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330126). AML was not included in the present analysis. The overall number of SPMs (invasive malignancies and NMSC), and the number and incidence rate (IR) of all invasive SPMs were evaluated, with IR defined as the number of new events per 100 person-years (pys). The IR of invasive SPMs was compared with the IR of new events of invasive cancer as reported from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) cancer registry (2.1/100 pys for persons aged ≥ 65 years) (Howalder N et al. National Cancer Institute, 2011). Results: The combined population of all 5 studies comprised 557 LEN-treated patients. The median age was 71 years (range 27–95 years) and 72% of patients were aged ≥ 65 years. 88 patients (15.8%) had a prior history of cancer including malignant melanoma, meningioma, breast cancer, lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma. A total of 28 patients (5.0%) developed ≥ 1 SPM, including 17 (3.1%) with an invasive SPM and 12 (2.2%) with NMSC; 1 patient had both an invasive malignancy and a NMSC. Two of the 17 patients with invasive SPMs had a B-cell malignancy and 15 had solid tumors of heterogeneous type. Of the 28 patients with SPMs in total, 5 patients had a prior history of cancer. The IR of invasive SPMs was 2.60/100 pys (95% confidence interval 1.56–4.07), which is consistent with the IR reported in the SEER database among patients in this age group (2.1/100 pys for persons aged ≥ 65 years). The median time to onset of SPMs was 13.5 months (range 0.3–48.6 months). Conclusion: There was no clear evidence to associate LEN treatment with an increased risk of developing SPMs in patients with Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with or without del(5q). The IR of invasive SPMs among these LEN-treated patients is what would be expected from population-based estimates of invasive cancer incidence among persons in this age group. The collection of data on SPMs in LEN-treated patients including post-marketing information is ongoing. Disclosures: Giagounidis: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. List:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fenaux:Merck: Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Benettaib:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brown:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhong:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brandenburg:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mufti:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Tolerability of Bosutinib and Imatinib in Older Versus Younger Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia–BELA Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4442.4442 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4442-4442 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽

Tim H Brümmendorf ◽

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Irina Dyagil ◽

Hagop M Kantarjian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Age Groups ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4442 Bosutinib (BOS) is an orally active, dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor with activity and manageable toxicity in the phase 3 BELA trial of patients (pts) with newly diagnosed (≤6 mo) chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The current analysis of the BELA trial summarizes the activity and tolerability of BOS 500 mg/d and imatinib (IM) 400 mg/d among older (≥65 y; BOS n = 30; IM n = 27) versus younger pts (<65 y; BOS n = 220; IM n = 225). Sokal risk scores were balanced between treatment arms but, as expected, higher among older pts (4% low; 72% intermediate; 25% high) versus younger pts (39% low; 44% intermediate; 17% high). Minimum follow-up duration was 24 mo. BOS was discontinued by 37% of pts (57% older vs 35% younger; P = 0.023); difference between age groups was primarily due to adverse events (AEs; 39% vs 22%; most commonly increased alanine aminotransferase [ALT]). IM was discontinued by 27% of pts (35% older vs 28% younger; P= 0.496); disease progression was the primary reason. In the intent-to-treat population, cumulative rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 24 mo in older/younger pts was 70%/80% on BOS and 78%/80% on IM. Median time to CCyR was 24.0 wk for older versus 12.7 wk for younger pts on BOS and 24.4 wk versus 24.7 wk on IM; in younger pts CCyR was achieved significantly faster on BOS versus IM (P<0.001). Among older/younger pts with a CCyR, 57%/79% on BOS and 76%/85% on IM were still on treatment and retained their CCyR as of the data cutoff. Cumulative rates of major molecular response (MMR) by 24 mo in older/younger pts were 53%/60% on BOS and 48%/49% on IM. Median time to MMR was 48.1 wk for older versus 48.0 wk for younger pts on BOS and 60.6 wk versus 84.1 wks on IM; for younger pts MMR was achieved significantly faster on BOS versus IM (P<0.001). Among older/younger pts with a MMR, 63%/84% on BOS and 92%/89% on IM were still on treatment and retained their MMR as of the data cutoff. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival in older/younger pts at 2 y was 100%/91% on BOS and 81%/88% on IM. Kaplan-Meier on-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase CML by 2 y was 0% for older and 2% (4 transformations) for younger pts on BOS (4 total), and 9% (2 transformations) for older and 5% (11 transformations) for younger pts on IM (13 total). Kaplan-Meier overall survival in older/younger pts at 2 y was 100%/97% on BOS and 92%/95% on IM. The majority of deaths were due to disease progression (BOS, n = 6; IM, n = 10); few deaths due to AEs on BOS (n = 1) or IM (n = 2) were reported, none treatment related. BOS was associated with higher rates of gastrointestinal TEAEs, elevated ALT and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and pyrexia; IM was associated with higher rates of musculoskeletal TEAEs and edema (Table). Rates of common TEAEs were generally similar or higher among older pts. Pleural/pericardial effusion occurred in 6 (21%) older pts (3/6 with treatment-related events; median event duration, 36.5 d) versus 5 (2%) younger pts (all with treatment-related events) on BOS, and in no IM pts. Overall grade 3/4 TEAEs were more frequent among older pts on both BOS and IM, as was dose modification (Table). Grade 3/4 lab abnormalities of elevated ALT (BOS, 18% older/24% younger; IM, 4% each) and AST (BOS, 7%/12%; IM, 4% each) were more frequent with BOS versus IM, but similar between age groups. Grade 3/4 lab abnormalities of neutropenia were more frequent with IM (23% older/22% younger) versus BOS (11% each) regardless of age; grade 3/4 anemia (6%-14%) and thrombocytopenia (14%-23%) were generally similar regardless of age or treatment arm. In conclusion, BOS demonstrated activity in both older and younger pts with newly diagnosed CP CML. Although the frequency of certain toxicities as well as treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs was higher among older pts, the toxicity profile of BOS remained manageable and distinct from that of IM regardless of age. Event, % BOS IM ≥65 y (n = 28) <65 y (n = 220) ≥65 y (n = 26) <65 y (n = 225) Non-hematologic TEAEsa Diarrhea 86 68 46 22 Rash 36 22 27 18 Nausea 36 32 31 37 Vomiting 32 32 19 15 Dyspnea 32 5 12 3 Pyrexia 29 17 4 13 Elevated ALT 29 32 15 8 Elevated AST 25 27 15 8 Elevated lipase 25 12 19 10 Headache 21 12 8 12 Asthenia 21 5 4 7 Dyspepsia 14 6 23 5 Muscle spasms 14 3 35 21 Periorbital edema 7 <1 35 12 Any grade 3/4 TEAE 89 65 73 56 Dose reduction due to AE 64 40 42 18 Dose interruption due to AE 89 63 69 42 Treatment discontinuation due to AE 39 22 8 9 All treated pts were included in the safety analyses. a Includes TEAEs reported for ≥20% of older or younger pts. Disclosures: Gambacorti-Passerini: Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy. Brümmendorf:Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Patent on the use of imatinib and hypusination: Patents & Royalties. Kim:BMS, Novartis, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Pfizer Inc: Research Funding. Pavlov:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gogat:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Duvillie:Pfizer Inc: Employment. Shapiro:Pfizer Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cortes:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ariad, Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Prevalence and Impact on Outcomes of Additional Karyotypic Abnormalities in Patients (Pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Del(5q) from the MDS-003 and MDS-004 Studies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1680.1680 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1680-1680

Author(s):

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

Alan F. List ◽

Eva Hellström-Lindberg ◽

Ghulam J. Mufti ◽

Brigitte Schlegelberger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Multicenter Studies ◽

Free Survival ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Poor Risk ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Good Risk ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 50% of pts with de novoMDS present with cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis (Haase D, et al. Ann Hematol. 1995;70:171); deletion (del)5q occurs in ~15% of pts (Haase D, et al. Blood. 2007;110:4385). Cytogenetic abnormalities in addition to del(5q) may be associated with shorter overall survival (OS) and increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) versus del(5q) alone (Mallo M, et al. Leukemia. 2011;25:110). In 2 large multicenter studies (MDS-003 and MDS-004), lenalidomide (LEN) was evaluated in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent pts with IPSS Low- or Intermediate-1-risk MDS and del(5q) (List A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1456; Fenaux P, et al. Blood. 2011;118:3765). Here, we examine specific cytogenetic abnormalities and outcomes in pts with MDS and del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional cytogenetic abnormalities from MDS-003 and MDS-004. Methods: Of 353 pts enrolled, 281 had available cytogenetic data with ≥ 12 evaluable metaphases, and were included. Pts received either LEN 10 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, LEN 5 mg or 10 mg continuously, or placebo (PBO). In MDS-004, at week (wk) 16, PBO pts could cross over to LEN 5 mg. Centrally reviewed cytogenetic studies were performed at baseline, and wks 24 and 48 (MDS-003); and at baseline, wks 12 and 24, and every 24 wks thereafter (MDS-004). RBC transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 26 wks, cytogenetic response (CyR), AML progression, OS, and AML-free survival were assessed by baseline cytogenetic complexity in LEN-treated pts with del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional abnormalities. These patients did not fulfill IPSS lower-risk classification after central pathologic/cytogenetic evaluation. Results: Of 281 pts, 25 (8.9%) had del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional abnormalities at baseline. In these pts, the most common additional abnormalities at baseline were -7 (20.0%), del(13q) (20.0%), +21 (16.0%), and del(11q) (16.0%). Baseline characteristics were comparable across the 24 LEN-treated pts with 2 (n = 9), 3 (n = 8), or ≥ 4 (n = 7) additional abnormalities. Rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks were 44.4%, 50.0%, and 28.6% in pts with 2, 3, or ≥ 4 additional abnormalities (P = 0.77), respectively. In pts evaluable for CyR (n = 21), rates of CyR were 33.3%, 28.6%, and 20.0% (P = 1.00), respectively; all cytogenetic responders achieved RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks. The other pts who achieved RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks but did not meet the criteria for CyR showed reductions in the del(5q) clone. No PBO pts achieved CyR; however, 1 pt had a partial response (PR) after crossover to LEN 5 mg. Of the pts randomized to LEN, 4 achieved a complete response (CR) (5 mg, n = 1; 10 mg, n = 3) and 2 achieved a PR (5 mg and 10 mg). Median duration of CyR was 282 days (range 168-957). The median number of additional cytogenetic abnormalities in the subset of pts with poor-risk abnormalities (i.e. 17p, 3q, and monosomal abnormalities; n = 7) was 3 versus 2 in pts with good-risk abnormalities (i.e. all other abnormalities; n = 14). Rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks were 28.6% versus 57.1% for the poor-risk versus good-risk groups, respectively. Rates of CyR were 14.3% versus 35.7%, respectively (all CR). In pts with 2, 3, or ≥ 4 additional abnormalities, the 2-year AML progression rates were 56.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.8-89.9), 40.0% (95% CI 14.8-80.5), and 33.3% (95% CI 5.5-94.6), respectively. Median time to AML was 1.8 years (95% CI 0.6-not reached [NR]), 3.1 years (95% CI 0.4-4.8), and NR (95% CI 1.6-NR) (P = 0.75), respectively (Figure 1A). Of 10 pts who developed AML, 6 had involvement of chromosome 7 [del(7q) or -7] at baseline, but presence of -7 did not necessarily portend a poor response in all. Median OS was 1.8 years (95% CI 0.6-3.7), 3.6 years (95% CI 0.5-NR), and 1.6 years (95% CI 0.2-3.3) (P = 0.17) in pts with 2, 3, or ≥ 4 additional abnormalities (Figure 1B). Median AML-free survival was 1.5 years (95% CI 0.6-3.7), 2.5 years (95% CI 0.4-4.8), and 1.6 years (95% CI 0.2-3.3) (P = 0.36), respectively (Figure 1C). Conclusions: Although RBC-TI and CyR with LEN do occur in pts with del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional abnormalities, the prognosis is generally dismal and less favorable versus isolated del(5q) and del(5q) plus 1 additional abnormality (Giagounidis A, et al. Blood. 2014;124:abstract 3270). Pts with del(5q) and complex karyotypes are generally associated with IPSS Intermediate-2- or High-risk MDS, which require more intensive treatment approaches, including azacitidine and stem cell transplantation, if feasible. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures Giagounidis: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hellström-Lindberg:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Mufti:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Morrill:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Low- or Int-1- Risk MDS Results in Reduced Bleeding without Impacting Leukemic Progression: Final Follow-up Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2000.2000 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2000-2000

Author(s):

Hagop Kantarjian ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Jeffrey Szer ◽

Uwe Platzbecker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Drug ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia occurs in ~50% of patients with low/int-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is associated with reduced survival. In a placebo (PBO)-controlled study, 250 patients with MDS were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly romiplostim or PBO. In the original June 2011 analysis, romiplostim reduced clinically significant bleeding events [hazard ratio (HR) romiplostim vs PBO 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66−1.05, P = 0.13] and platelet transfusions (relative risk 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66−0.88, P<0.001) and increased IWG hematologic improvement platelets (HI-P) incidence (odds ratio 15.6, 95% CI: 4.7−51.8, P<0.001). Peripheral blast count increases >10% were more frequent with romiplostim (25/167, 15%) than PBO (3/83, 3.6%) and resolved after discontinuation in most cases. In February 2011, the DMC recommended that treatment with study drug be discontinued as the potential benefit seen in the reduction of bleeding did not outweigh the potential risk for disease progression to AML, and that transient increases in blast cell counts might put patients at risk for diagnosis of and treatment for AML. Patients were moved into long-term follow-up (LTFU). Previously reported (Giagounidis et al, Cancer 2014) 58-week incidence of AML was 6.0% (N = 10) for romiplostim and 4.9% for PBO (N = 4); HR 1.20 (95% CI: 0.38−3.84). This report provides final 5-year LTFU data. Methods: Eligible patients were receiving only supportive care and had IPSS low/int-1 risk MDS and platelets 1) ≤20 × 109/L or 2) ≤50 × 109/L with a history of bleeding. Disease progression to AML was defined as 1) ≥20% blasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood after 4 weeks following discontinuation of romiplostim; 2) pathology consistent with leukemia; or 3) antileukemic treatment. Results are presented by treatment group. Results: At baseline, median (Q1, Q3) age was 70 (61, 77) years, the majority (59%) of patients were male; 27.6% were IPSS low risk and 72.4% were int-1 risk. WHO classifications were RCMD: 67.6%, RAEB-1: 13.2%, MDS-U: 11.2%, RA: 4.4%, RCMD-RS: 2.4%, RARS: 0.8%, and RAEB-2: 0.4%. Of 250 patients in the study, 210 entered LTFU and 66 completed the 5 years of LTFU; median (Q1, Q3) follow-up was 27.5 (10.8, 58.7) months. Reasons for discontinuation (death, lost to follow-up, and consent withdrawal) during LTFU were similar in both groups. During the active study period and LTFU, death was reported in 93 (55.7%) patients in the romiplostim group and 45 (54.2%) patients in the PBO group (HR romiplostim vs PBO 1.03, 95% CI: 0.72−1.47) (Figure); mortality rates were greater in those with IPSS int-1 vs low risk for both groups (Table). AML was reported in 20 (11.9%) patients in the romiplostim group and 9 (11.0%) patients in the PBO group (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.48−2.33). The proportions of patients who either died or developed AML were 56.9% (N = 95) in the romiplostim group and 55.4% (N = 46) in the PBO group (HR for AML-free survival 1.04, 95% CI: 0.73−1.48) (Figure). Nearly half (N = 14, 48%) of the 29 AML cases occurred in patients who were RAEB-1 at screening (none RAEB-2), and 6 cases were diagnosed because of anti-AML treatment use alone (Table). In LTFU, patient-reported use of MDS therapy (eg, azacitidine or cyclosporine) was 42.8% (N = 59, 95% CI: 34.4%−51.5%) in the romiplostim group and 31.4% (N = 22, 95% CI: 20.9%−43.6%) in the PBO group. AML therapy (eg, chemotherapy) was used in 14 (10.2%) patients in the romiplostim group and 7 (10.0%) patients in the PBO group. Conclusions: Following the decision in 2011 to stop study drug secondary to increased AML rates at that time and transient blasts increases, final 5-year LTFU HRs (romiplostim vs placebo) for death or progression to AML, respectively, are 1.03 (95% CI: 0.72−1.47) and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.48−2.33). In conclusion, romiplostim reduced bleeding events and platelet transfusions, with no increase in AML incidence or impact on survival. Disclosures Kantarjian: Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Fenaux:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Szer:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Australia: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kuendgen:Celgene: Research Funding. Gaidano:Morphosys: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak:Angelini: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Carpenter:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mehta:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Franklin:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giagounidis:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text