Prevalence and Impact on Outcomes of Additional Karyotypic Abnormalities in Patients (Pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Del(5q) from the MDS-003 and MDS-004 Studies

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 50% of pts with de novoMDS present with cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis (Haase D, et al. Ann Hematol. 1995;70:171); deletion (del)5q occurs in ~15% of pts (Haase D, et al. Blood. 2007;110:4385). Cytogenetic abnormalities in addition to del(5q) may be associated with shorter overall survival (OS) and increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) versus del(5q) alone (Mallo M, et al. Leukemia. 2011;25:110). In 2 large multicenter studies (MDS-003 and MDS-004), lenalidomide (LEN) was evaluated in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent pts with IPSS Low- or Intermediate-1-risk MDS and del(5q) (List A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1456; Fenaux P, et al. Blood. 2011;118:3765). Here, we examine specific cytogenetic abnormalities and outcomes in pts with MDS and del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional cytogenetic abnormalities from MDS-003 and MDS-004. Methods: Of 353 pts enrolled, 281 had available cytogenetic data with ≥ 12 evaluable metaphases, and were included. Pts received either LEN 10 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle, LEN 5 mg or 10 mg continuously, or placebo (PBO). In MDS-004, at week (wk) 16, PBO pts could cross over to LEN 5 mg. Centrally reviewed cytogenetic studies were performed at baseline, and wks 24 and 48 (MDS-003); and at baseline, wks 12 and 24, and every 24 wks thereafter (MDS-004). RBC transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 26 wks, cytogenetic response (CyR), AML progression, OS, and AML-free survival were assessed by baseline cytogenetic complexity in LEN-treated pts with del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional abnormalities. These patients did not fulfill IPSS lower-risk classification after central pathologic/cytogenetic evaluation. Results: Of 281 pts, 25 (8.9%) had del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional abnormalities at baseline. In these pts, the most common additional abnormalities at baseline were -7 (20.0%), del(13q) (20.0%), +21 (16.0%), and del(11q) (16.0%). Baseline characteristics were comparable across the 24 LEN-treated pts with 2 (n = 9), 3 (n = 8), or ≥ 4 (n = 7) additional abnormalities. Rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks were 44.4%, 50.0%, and 28.6% in pts with 2, 3, or ≥ 4 additional abnormalities (P = 0.77), respectively. In pts evaluable for CyR (n = 21), rates of CyR were 33.3%, 28.6%, and 20.0% (P = 1.00), respectively; all cytogenetic responders achieved RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks. The other pts who achieved RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks but did not meet the criteria for CyR showed reductions in the del(5q) clone. No PBO pts achieved CyR; however, 1 pt had a partial response (PR) after crossover to LEN 5 mg. Of the pts randomized to LEN, 4 achieved a complete response (CR) (5 mg, n = 1; 10 mg, n = 3) and 2 achieved a PR (5 mg and 10 mg). Median duration of CyR was 282 days (range 168-957). The median number of additional cytogenetic abnormalities in the subset of pts with poor-risk abnormalities (i.e. 17p, 3q, and monosomal abnormalities; n = 7) was 3 versus 2 in pts with good-risk abnormalities (i.e. all other abnormalities; n = 14). Rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks were 28.6% versus 57.1% for the poor-risk versus good-risk groups, respectively. Rates of CyR were 14.3% versus 35.7%, respectively (all CR). In pts with 2, 3, or ≥ 4 additional abnormalities, the 2-year AML progression rates were 56.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 25.8-89.9), 40.0% (95% CI 14.8-80.5), and 33.3% (95% CI 5.5-94.6), respectively. Median time to AML was 1.8 years (95% CI 0.6-not reached [NR]), 3.1 years (95% CI 0.4-4.8), and NR (95% CI 1.6-NR) (P = 0.75), respectively (Figure 1A). Of 10 pts who developed AML, 6 had involvement of chromosome 7 [del(7q) or -7] at baseline, but presence of -7 did not necessarily portend a poor response in all. Median OS was 1.8 years (95% CI 0.6-3.7), 3.6 years (95% CI 0.5-NR), and 1.6 years (95% CI 0.2-3.3) (P = 0.17) in pts with 2, 3, or ≥ 4 additional abnormalities (Figure 1B). Median AML-free survival was 1.5 years (95% CI 0.6-3.7), 2.5 years (95% CI 0.4-4.8), and 1.6 years (95% CI 0.2-3.3) (P = 0.36), respectively (Figure 1C). Conclusions: Although RBC-TI and CyR with LEN do occur in pts with del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional abnormalities, the prognosis is generally dismal and less favorable versus isolated del(5q) and del(5q) plus 1 additional abnormality (Giagounidis A, et al. Blood. 2014;124:abstract 3270). Pts with del(5q) and complex karyotypes are generally associated with IPSS Intermediate-2- or High-risk MDS, which require more intensive treatment approaches, including azacitidine and stem cell transplantation, if feasible. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures Giagounidis: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hellström-Lindberg:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Mufti:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Morrill:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Analysis of Second Primary Malignancies in Lenalidomide-Treated Patients with IPSS Low- or Int-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1704.1704 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1704-1704 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

Azra Raza ◽

Alan F. List ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Bouchra Benettaib ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Prior History ◽

Second Primary ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Increased Risk ◽

History Of ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Abstract 1704 Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) is approved in the US for the treatment of RBC transfusion-dependent patients with IPSS Low- or Int-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with del(5q), with or without other cytogenetic abnormalities. In a phase 3 trial, treatment with LEN 5 mg and 10 mg resulted in RBC transfusion independence (TI) for ≥ 26 weeks in 43% and 56% of such patients, cytogenetic response in 25% and 50%, and a significant improvement of health-related quality of life (p <.05 for both 5 mg and 10 mg). Achievement of RBC-TI ≥ 8 weeks was associated with a significantly reduced risk of AML progression and death (p <.05 for both) (Fenaux P et al. Blood 2011;doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330126). In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, results of phase 3 trials showed a numerical imbalance in the occurrence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) between patients treated with LEN (in combination with melphalan or immediately after high-dose melphalan therapy and stem cell transplantation) and control cohorts. SPMs were analyzed in clinical trials of LEN across indications, including MDS. Methods: This was a single arm analysis of SPM data retrieved from RBC transfusion-dependent patients with IPSS Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with or without del(5q) who received LEN as monotherapy in 5 studies (MDS-001, -002, -003, -004, and -007). The cutoff date was February 28, 2011. SPMs were defined using MedDRA (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) categories of invasive SPMs (hematologic malignancies and solid tumors) and non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is considered part of the natural history of disease progression in MDS. Although further follow-up is needed, results of a phase 3 study showed no obvious evidence for an increased risk of AML progression in LEN-treated RBC transfusion-dependent patients with IPSS Low- or Int-1-risk MDS and del(5q) (Fenaux P et al. Blood 2011;doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330126). AML was not included in the present analysis. The overall number of SPMs (invasive malignancies and NMSC), and the number and incidence rate (IR) of all invasive SPMs were evaluated, with IR defined as the number of new events per 100 person-years (pys). The IR of invasive SPMs was compared with the IR of new events of invasive cancer as reported from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) cancer registry (2.1/100 pys for persons aged ≥ 65 years) (Howalder N et al. National Cancer Institute, 2011). Results: The combined population of all 5 studies comprised 557 LEN-treated patients. The median age was 71 years (range 27–95 years) and 72% of patients were aged ≥ 65 years. 88 patients (15.8%) had a prior history of cancer including malignant melanoma, meningioma, breast cancer, lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, and basal cell carcinoma. A total of 28 patients (5.0%) developed ≥ 1 SPM, including 17 (3.1%) with an invasive SPM and 12 (2.2%) with NMSC; 1 patient had both an invasive malignancy and a NMSC. Two of the 17 patients with invasive SPMs had a B-cell malignancy and 15 had solid tumors of heterogeneous type. Of the 28 patients with SPMs in total, 5 patients had a prior history of cancer. The IR of invasive SPMs was 2.60/100 pys (95% confidence interval 1.56–4.07), which is consistent with the IR reported in the SEER database among patients in this age group (2.1/100 pys for persons aged ≥ 65 years). The median time to onset of SPMs was 13.5 months (range 0.3–48.6 months). Conclusion: There was no clear evidence to associate LEN treatment with an increased risk of developing SPMs in patients with Low- or Int-1-risk MDS with or without del(5q). The IR of invasive SPMs among these LEN-treated patients is what would be expected from population-based estimates of invasive cancer incidence among persons in this age group. The collection of data on SPMs in LEN-treated patients including post-marketing information is ongoing. Disclosures: Giagounidis: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. List:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fenaux:Merck: Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Benettaib:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brown:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhong:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brandenburg:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mufti:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Azacitidine (AZA) Prolongs Overall Survival in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with Poor Prognostic Karyotypes Compared with Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1638.1638 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1638-1638 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hartmut Döhner ◽

Paresh Vyas ◽

John F. Seymour ◽

Valeria Santini ◽

Richard M. Stone ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Complex Karyotype ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Poor Risk ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Karyotype is the strongest independent prognostic factor for survival in AML. The randomized phase 3 AZA-AML-001 study of older patients with AML showed AZA prolonged overall survival (OS) compared with CCR (10.4 vs 6.5 months, respectively; P=0.101) (Dombret et al, Blood, 2015). In a prospective subanalysis of the study, AZA was shown to meaningfully prolong OS by 3.2 months compared with CCR (P=0.0185) in the subgroup of patients with NCCN-defined poor-risk cytogenetics (Döhner et al, Blood, 2014: Abstract 621). Aim: This analysis evaluates treatment effects of AZA vs CCR on OS in subgroups of patients with specific cytogenetic abnormalities as well as in patient subgroups defined by cytogenetic risk per modified European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations (not considering molecular markers) (Döhner et al, Blood, 2010). Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed AML (>30% bone marrow [BM] blasts), ECOG performance status score ≤2, intermediate- or poor-risk cytogenetics per NCCN 2009 criteria, and WBC count ≤15x109/L were randomized to receive AZA (75 mg/m2/day [d] x7d/28d) or CCR: intensive chemotherapy (cytarabine 100-200mg/m2IV x7d + anthracycline IV x3d induction), low-dose ara-C (20mg SC BID x10d/28d), or best supportive care only. Karyotypes obtained from BM were reviewed centrally by an independent cytogeneticist. OS was evaluated in subgroups of patients with frequent specific abnormalities, including -5/del(5q), -7, -7/del(7q), abnormal (17p) or complex karyotype (based on specific abnormalities, patients may have been evaluated in more than one category). OS was also assessed for patients in ELN-defined karyotype risk subgroups: Intermediate (Int)-I (normal karyotype), Int-II (all abnormalities not classified as Favorable or Adverse), and Adverse karyotype. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using a weighted log-rank test. Results: Centrally reviewed cytogenetic data were available for 485/488 patients (99.4%). In all, 220 patients (45.4%; AZA n=114, CCR n=106) had Int-I karyotype, 111 patients (22.9%; AZA n=53, CCR n=58) had Int-II karyotype, and 154 patients (31.8%, AZA n=73, CCR n=81) had Adverse karyotype (Figure 1). OS was comparable between AZA and CCR in patients with Int-I karyotype (14.1 vs 10.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95%CI 0.60, 1.1; P=0.44) and patients with Int-II karyotype (8.9 vs 9.6 months; HR 1.19, 95%CI 0.79, 1.8; P=0.78). There was a significant 2.4-month median OS difference in favor of AZA in patients with Adverse karyotype (5.3 vs 2.9 months with CCR; HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.51, 0.99; P=0.046; Figure 2), with 1-year survival rates of 29.1% vs 14.7% for AZA and CCR, respectively. AZA was associated with longer median OS and higher 1-year survival compared with CCR for all subgroups of patients with the specific cytogenetic abnormalities under study: -5/del(5q), -7, -7/del(7q), abnormal (17p), and complex karyotype, with HRs ranging from 0.54 to 0.69(Table). Median OS in the CCR arm was less than 3 months for each of these subgroups. Similar to what has been reported in MDS (Ravandi et al, Cancer, 2009), AML patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities responded particularly well to AZA, with an improvement in median OS of 4.1 months over CCR. Patients with complex karyotypes also had meaningful improvements in OS, with ~15% more AZA-treated patients alive at 1 year than CCR patients. Conclusions: Prognosis is dismal for older AML patients with adverse karyotypes, and is especially poor for patients with complex karyotypes. Median OS and 1-year survival in patients with ELN-defined Adverse karyotype treated with AZA were almost double those of patients treated with CCR. AZA-treated patients with the specific cytogenetic abnormalities and/or complex karyotype in this analysis had a 31-46% reduction in risk of death vs CCR, and proportions of patients alive at 1 year were 11-22% greater with AZA. These data suggest AZA should be the preferred treatment for older patients with AML and adverse karyotypes. Disclosures Seymour: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Santini:Astex: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stone:Celator: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xenetic Biosciences: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Al-Ali:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Morrill:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Songer:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weaver:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Beach:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dombret:Agios: Honoraria; Ambit (Daiichi Sankyo): Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria; Menarini: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Sunesis: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Kite Pharma.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide Treatment Is Not Related to AML Progression Risk but Is Associated with a Survival Benefit in RBC Transfusion-Dependent Patients with IPSS Low- or Int-1-Risk MDS with del5q: Results From a Comparative Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.119.119 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 119-119 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Andrea Kuendgen ◽

Michael Lauseker ◽

Alan F. List ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lower Risk ◽

Survival Benefit ◽

Research Funding ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Rbc Transfusion ◽

Reduced Risk

Abstract Abstract 119 Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) treatment resulted in RBC transfusion independence for ≥ 8 wks in 51–67% of patients (pts) and cytogenetic response in 25–73% of pts with lower-risk MDS and del5q in 2 large multicenter trials (MDS-003 and -004) (List A et al. NEJM 2006;355:1456–65; Fenaux P et al. Blood 2011; doi:10.1182/blood-2011-01-330126). However, these studies were either single-arm or allowed early crossover to LEN, thus data on the influence of LEN on AML progression and overall survival (OS) is lacking. Aims: To assess the risk of AML progression and death in LEN-treated MDS-003 and -004 pts vs untreated MDS pts with del5q from a large multicenter registry, and to determine relevant risk factors. Methods: Data from 459 MDS pts with del5q entered into local or regional MDS registries were retrospectively collected from 9 centers (Europe, USA, Australia) using a uniform minimal data set. Eligible pt controls had IPSS Low-/Int-1-risk MDS and were RBC transfusion-dependent (≥ 1 unit/8 wks), reflecting the relevant inclusion criteria for both trials, and received best supportive care only including ESAs. Incidence of AML progression was assessed using a cumulative incidence estimator in the presence of competing risk (ie, death), and considering left truncation (LT) for the LEN cohort. OS was assessed using a cumulative probability estimator considering LT. Cox proportional hazards (PH) models with LT were used to assess the impact of LEN treatment and baseline factors (ie, age, sex, cytogenetics, bone marrow [BM] blast %, transfusion burden, no. of cytopenias, hemoglobin [Hgb] level [g/dL], and platelet and neutrophil counts) on risk of AML progression and death. LT is a statistical method to correct for different starting points of follow-up (ie, date of first LEN dose in clinical trial pts vs date of diagnosis in registry pts). Results: We analyzed 295 LEN-treated and 125 untreated pts. Baseline characteristics of treated (at first LEN dose) vs untreated (at diagnosis) pts were similar: mean age 65.0 vs 66.2 yrs; female sex 71% vs 68%; IPSS Low-/Int-1-risk 43%/57% vs 43%/57%. Median observation time was 4.3 vs 4.6 yrs. Baseline RBC transfusion burden was higher in the LEN cohort (median [range] units/8 wks: 6 [1–25] vs 2 [1–10]). Two- and 5-yr cumulative AML incidences were 7% and 23% for LEN vs 12% and 20% for the untreated cohort. Two- and 5-yr cumulative OS probabilities were 90% and 54% for LEN vs 74% and 41% for the untreated cohort. Median time to AML progression has not been reached for either cohort. Median OS was 5.2 yrs (95% CI 4.5–5.9) for LEN-treated vs 3.8 yrs (95% CI 2.9–4.8) for untreated pts. In the final Cox PH models, LEN treatment (hazard ratio [HR].939; p =.860) and 1 cytogenetic abnormality (abn) in addition to del5q (HR 1.111; p =.755) did not increase the risk of AML progression. Significant factors associated with an increased risk of AML progression were complex cytogenetics (del5q plus > 1 abn; HR 3.627; p =.002), BM blasts 5–10% (HR 2.215; p =.016), and higher transfusion burden (HR 1.097 [10% increase in risk per unit at baseline]; p =.029); higher Hgb levels were associated with a reduced risk (HR.857; p =.054). Regarding survival, LEN treatment was associated with a reduced risk of death (HR.597; p =.012). Other factors associated with decreased mortality were higher Hgb levels (HR.883; p =.028), higher platelet counts (HR.999; p =.035), and female sex (HR.598; p =.002). Higher transfusion burden (HR 1.056; p =.037) and age (HR 1.049; p <.001) increased the risk of death. In separate Cox PH models considering IPSS risk (Int-1 vs Low) and transfusion dependency for AML progression and OS, as well as age and sex for OS only, IPSS Int-1-risk was associated with an increased risk of AML progression (HR 1.689; p =.041) but not with an increased risk of death (HR 1.056; p =.723). Findings for LEN treatment when considering IPSS risk were similar to the final Cox PH models that considered individual covariates (AML progression: HR.892, p =.741; OS: HR.545; p =.003). Results were similar when Cox PH models were reanalyzed without LT. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of RBC transfusion-dependent pts with lower-risk MDS and del5q, LEN treatment was not associated with a higher risk of AML progression but led to a survival benefit vs untreated pts, despite a higher transfusion burden in the LEN cohort. Other significant risk factors for AML progression and death are consistent with previous findings in MDS pts. Disclosures: Kuendgen: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. List:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fenaux:Merck: Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Giagounidis:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brandenburg:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Backstrom:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Glasmacher:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hasford:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Germing:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Additional Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Patients (Pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Deletion 5q from the MDS-003 and MDS-004 Studies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3270.3270 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3270-3270

Author(s):

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

Alan F. List ◽

Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg ◽

Ghulam J. Mufti ◽

Brigitte Schlegelberger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clinical Impact ◽

Structural Rearrangements ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Introduction: Around 50% of pts with de novo MDS present with chromosomal abnormalities at diagnosis. One of the most common cytogenetic abnormalities in MDS, deletion 5q [del(5q)], occurs in ~15% of pts (Haase et al. Blood 2007;110:4385-95). The presence of cytogenetic abnormalities in addition to del(5q) may be associated with shorter overall survival (OS) and increased risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) versus del(5q) alone (Mallo et al. Leukemia 2011;25:110-20). In 2 large multicenter studies (MDS-003 and MDS-004), lenalidomide (LEN) was evaluated in RBC transfusion-dependent pts with IPSS Low/Intermediate (Int)-1-risk MDS and del(5q) (List et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1456-65; Fenaux et al. Blood 2011;118:3765-76). This analysis describes the prevalence and clinical impact of the most common cytogenetic abnormalities in pts with del(5q) from MDS-003 and MDS-004. Methods: Of 353 pts enrolled in MDS-003 and MDS-004, 281 pts had available cytogenetic data with ≥ 16 metaphases evaluable, and were included in the analysis. Pts received 10 mg LEN on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle; LEN 5 mg or 10 mg continuously; or placebo. In MDS-004, placebo pts could crossover to LEN 5 mg by Week (Wk) 16. Centrally reviewed cytogenetic studies were performed at baseline, and wks 24 and 48 (MDS-003); or baseline, Wk 24, and every 24 wks thereafter (MDS-004). RBC-transfusion independence (RBC-TI) ≥ 26 wks, cytogenetic response (CyR), AML progression, and OS were assessed by most common cytogenetic abnormalities in LEN-treated pts with del(5q) plus 1 additional abnormality. Some pts did not fulfill the IPSS lower-risk classification after central pathologic/cytogenetic evaluation. For this analysis outcomes in the del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional abnormalities group were not evaluated. Results: Of the 281 pts, 70.8% had isolated del(5q), 19.9% del(5q) plus 1 additional abnormality, and 9.3% had del(5q) plus ≥ 2 additional abnormalities. Baseline characteristics including age, time from diagnosis, RBC transfusion burden, hemoglobin level, and platelet and absolute neutrophil counts were comparable across the cytogenetic groups. In pts with del(5q) plus 1 additional abnormality at baseline, the most common numerical abnormalities were +8 (17.9%; n = 10), +21 (14.3%; n = 8), and −7 (3.6%; n = 2); the most common balanced structural rearrangements were translocation 2;11 [t(2;11)] (5.4%; n = 3) and isochromosome 21q [i(21q)] (3.6%; n = 2); and the most common unbalanced structural rearrangements were del(11q) (7.1%; n = 4), del(20q) (5.4%; n = 3), del(9q) (3.6%; n = 2), and del(12p) (3.6%; n = 2) (Figure). In the del(5q) plus 1 additional abnormality group, baseline characteristics were comparable across pts with +8, +21, or other abnormalities (i.e. excluding those with +21 and +8), with the exception of age (P = 0.023). Rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks and CyR did not significantly differ among LEN-treated pts with +8 (n = 9), +21 (n = 8), or other abnormalities (n = 37). Rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks were 66.7%, 50.0%, and 54.1% (P = 0.839), respectively. In pts evaluable for CyR (n = 40), CyR rates were 42.9%, 42.9%, and 65.4% (P = 0.407), respectively. Median time to AML progression was shorter in LEN-treated pts with +21 (2.6 years [yrs]; 95% CI 1.2–4.8) versus +8 (4.8 yrs; 95% CI 1.6–not estimable) or other abnormalities (7.5 yrs; 95% CI 4.1–7.5) (P = 0.0143). The 5-year AML progression rates were 68.8% (95% CI 26.6–98.7), 85.7% (95% CI 53.5–99.3), and 36.3% (95% CI 19.2–61.3) in pts with +8, +21, or other abnormalities, respectively. Median OS was 4.1 yrs (95% CI 0.9–5.3), 3.0 yrs (95% CI 1.1–4.9), and 3.4 yrs (95% CI 2.6–6.5) (P = 0.423), respectively. Of the 2 pts with −7: 1 pt with Int-1-risk MDS had a 92% to 8% reduction of −7-positive metaphases at Day 84 on treatment, but no RBC-TI ≥ 26 wks, and died at Day 709 without AML; the other Int-2-risk pt progressed to AML on Day 147 with clearance of −7 from 8%, and development of new +8 and del(16q) abnormalities. Conclusions:In MDS pts with del(5q) plus 1 additional abnormality from MDS-003 and MDS-004, the most common cytogenetic abnormalities were +8, +21, del(11q), del(20q), and t(2;11), which accounted for 50% of the additional abnormalities at baseline. In the del(5q) plus 1 additional abnormality population, median time to AML progression was shorter in pts with +21 versus either +8 or other abnormalities. Due to small pt numbers, larger prospective analyses are needed to confirm these observations. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Giagounidis: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. List:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Hellstrom-Lindberg:Celgene: Research Funding. Mufti:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schlegelberger:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Morrill:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Impact Of The Proportion Of Metaphases With Isolated Del(5q) On Clinical Outcomes In Lenalidomide (LEN)-Treated Patients With IPSS Low-/Int-1-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) In MDS-003 and MDS-004

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.1538.1538 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 1538-1538

Author(s):

Aristoteles Giagounidis ◽

Alan List ◽

Eva Hellström-Lindberg ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Ghulam J. Mufti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Rank Test ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Log Rank Test ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Abstract Introduction The proportion of aberrant metaphases is prognostic for overall survival (OS) in MDS patients with trisomy 8 (Mallo M, et al. Leuk Res. 2011;35:834-6). The impact of the proportion of metaphases with del(5q) on clinical outcomes, including OS, disease progression and response to therapy with LEN in MDS remains undefined. In two large multicenter studies of LEN (MDS-003 and MDS-004) in RBC transfusion-dependent patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Low- or Intermediate (Int)-1-risk del(5q) MDS, RBC transfusion independence (TI) ≥ 8 weeks was achieved in 51–67% of patients (List A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1456-65; Fenaux P, et al. Blood. 2011;118:3765-76). This retrospective analysis evaluated response to treatment, progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and OS by proportion of del(5q) metaphases in patients with isolated del(5q) from the MDS-003 and 004 studies. Methods In order to allow sufficient patient numbers for analysis, ≥ 16 metaphases were evaluated for del(5q) by standard karyotyping (MDS-003 and MDS-004) and 200 interphase nuclei were evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; MDS-004 only) using a probe for the commonly deleted region 5q31 (LSI EGR1/D5S721, Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany). Patients received LEN on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle (10 mg) or continuously (5 mg or 10 mg), or placebo. In MDS-004, patients randomized to placebo could cross over to LEN 5 mg by week 16. RBC-TI ≥ 26 weeks, time to AML progression and OS were analyzed by the proportion of del(5q) metaphases or interphases (≤ 60% vs > 60%) using standard karyotyping and FISH, respectively. Results Of the 353 patients from MDS-003 and MDS-004, 194 had isolated del(5q) by standard karyotyping; median proportion of del(5q) metaphases was 96% (range 4–100). Baseline characteristics including age, time from diagnosis, RBC transfusion burden, hemoglobin level, platelet and absolute neutrophil counts were comparable among patients with ≤ 60% (n = 21) and > 60% (n = 173) del(5q) metaphases. Rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 weeks were similar across patients in the ≤ 60% and > 60% groups (P = 0.6515). Time to AML progression was comparable for patients in the ≤ 60% group versus the > 60% group (log-rank test P = 0.9802); 2-year rates were 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.7–54.5%) and 14.6% (95% CI: 9.9–21.2%), respectively. Time to AML progression was similar when analyzed with death without AML as competing risk (Gray’s test P = 0.5514). OS was longer in the > 60% versus the ≤ 60% group (log-rank test P = 0.0436); median OS was 3.7 years (95% CI: 3.0–4.2) and 2.4 years (95% CI: 1.5–4.9), respectively. In MDS-004, the proportion of del(5q) interphases was analyzed using FISH in 106 patients, including 46 with ≤ 60% and 60 with > 60%. When analyzed by FISH, rates of RBC-TI ≥ 26 weeks were similar across patients in the ≤ 60% and > 60% groups (P = 1.000). Time to AML progression and OS were similar across these groups (log-rank test P = 0.7311 and P = 0.8639, respectively) when analyzed by FISH. In the ≤ 60% and > 60% groups respectively, 2-year AML progression rates were 14.8% (95% CI: 6.9–30.1%) and 18.6% (95% CI: 10.4–32.0%), and median OS was 3.1 years (95% CI: 2.3–4.8) and 2.9 years (95% CI: 2.3–4.4). Time to AML progression was similar when analyzed with death without AML as competing risk (Gray’s test P = 0.8631). Conclusions In IPSS Low- or Int-1-risk MDS patients with isolated del(5q) treated with LEN in MDS-003 and MDS-004 studies, baseline characteristics, RBC-TI ≥ 26 weeks and AML progression were comparable in patients with > 60% versus ≤ 60% del(5q) metaphases. Although similar across groups when analyzed by FISH in a subset of patients, surprisingly, OS was longer in patients with > 60% del(5q) metaphases than in those with ≤ 60% del(5q) metaphases by standard karyotyping. However, the number of patients with ≤ 60% del(5q) metaphases was limited and no adjustment was made for multiple testing. These findings suggest that the number of cells with the isolated del(5q) abnormality measured by FISH does not impact clinical outcome in this RBC transfusion-dependent study population, but this finding could not be confirmed for OS by standard karyotyping. Disclosures: Giagounidis: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. List:Celgene: Serve on Celgene Data Safety & Monitoring Committee Other. Hellström-Lindberg:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mufti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schlegelberger:Celgene: Consultancy. Morrill:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

An Evaluation of Molecular Response in a Phase 2 Open-Label, Multicenter Confirmatory Study in Patients (pts) with Relapsed/Refractory B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (r/r ALL) Receiving Treatment with the BiTE® Antibody Construct Blinatumomab

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3704.3704 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3704-3704 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Nicola Goekbuget ◽

Hagop Kantarjian ◽

Monika Brüggemann ◽

Anthony Stein ◽

Ralf C. Bargou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Pcr Amplification ◽

Relapse Free Survival ◽

First Line ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Minimum Sensitivity ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Blinatumomab is an investigational bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) antibody construct designed to direct cytotoxic T cells to CD19-expressing B cells. In a study in minimal residual disease (MRD)-positive ALL, 80% of pts achieved MRD-negative status after receiving one treatment cycle of blinatumomab (Topp MS, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2493-8). For pts with newly diagnosed ALL, persistence of MRD after first-line treatment predicts disease recurrence. However, only limited data are available about the relationship between MRD and outcome in adult pts with r/r ALL. Therefore, the aim of this secondary analysis was to evaluate MRD responses and their relationships to other efficacy indices in adult pts with r/r ALL receiving blinatumomab in this phase 2 study. Methods: Eligibility criteria included adult pts ≥18 years, with Philadelphia chromosome negative B-cell r/r ALL who were primary refractory or refractory to first salvage, had their first relapse within 12 months of first remission or allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), or received second or later salvage. Blinatumomab was dosed via continuous IV infusion at 28 μg/d (cycle 1 only: 9 μg/d on days 1-7, 28 μg/d on days 8-28) for up to five cycles (one cycle: 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off). The primary endpoint was complete remission (CR: ≤5% blasts with platelets >100,000/µL, absolute neutrophil count >1000/µL) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh*: platelets >50,000/µL, absolute neutrophil count >500/µL) within the first two treatment cycles. MRD in bone marrow was assessed at a central laboratory using allele-specific real-time quantitative PCR. Two MRD-based exploratory endpoints were analyzed: MRD response (no PCR amplification at a minimum sensitivity of 10-4 or <10-4 leukemic cells by PCR) and complete MRD response (no PCR amplification at a minimum sensitivity of 10-4) within the first two treatment cycles. Results: Of 189 treated pts (median [range] age = 39 [18–79] years), 81 (43%) pts had a CR (n = 63, 33%) or a CRh* (n = 18, 10%) during the first two treatment cycles. In the subgroup of pts with a CR/CRh* and evaluable MRD data (n = 73), 60 (82%) pts had an MRD response. Of those, 51 (70%) pts had a complete MRD response. The majority of those who achieved a CR/CRh* also achieved a complete MRD response regardless of the number of prior lines of salvage therapy (Table 1). Of all treated pts, 64 (34%) pts had prior HSCT. In pts who achieved CR/CRh*, the rate of MRD response was 81% in pts without and 85% in pts with prior HSCT. In pts who achieved CR/CRh*, the median (95% CI) duration of overall survival was 11.4 (8.5, not estimable) months for those with a MRD response and 6.7 (2.0, not estimable) months for those with no MRD response. The median (95% CI) duration of relapse-free survival was 6.9 (5.5, 10.1) months in patients with a MRD response and 2.3 (1.2, not estimable) months in patients with no MRD response. The HSCT realization rate did not differ significantly between pts with CR/CRh* and a MRD response and those with CR/CRh* and no MRD response (31% and 43%, respectively). Seventeen pts classified as nonresponders per protocol had ≤5% blasts and no evidence of disease, but recovery of peripheral counts did not meet criteria for CRh*. Ten of these 17 pts had evaluable MRD assessments; 50% (5/10) had MRD response and 20% (2/10) had complete MRD response. The clinical significance of this finding remains open. Grade ≥3 adverse events regardless of causality and occurring in >10% of all treated pts during treatment until 30 days after treatment were febrile neutropenia (25%), neutropenia (16%), and anemia (14%). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported in three (1.6%) patients. Three (1.6%) patients had grade 4 neurologic events, all resolved. Twenty-one (11%) patients had grade 3 neurologic events, 17 were resolved, with 4 events unresolved at death or unknown. Conclusion: In this largest study to date of adult pts with r/r ALL with PCR-based central assessment of MRD, pts who achieved CR/CRh* during single-agent treatment with blinatumomab had high MRD response rates. The exploratory analyses suggested that within pts with a CR/CRh*, those who did not achieve MRD responses tended to have shorter durations of overall and relapse-free survival. These results are consistent with prior reports highlighting the importance of achieving an MRD response in first-line therapy. Disclosures Goekbuget: Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: This presentation will discuss the off-label use of blinatumomab, as this agent is not approved for use by the FDA, EMA or any other regulatory authorities. Kantarjian:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Brüggemann:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stein:Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bargou:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dombret:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Heffner:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Research Funding; Dana Farber CI: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Idera: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Talon Therapeutics: Research Funding. Rigal-Huguet:Amgen, Inc.: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Litzow:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zugmaier:Amgen Reseach (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Jia:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Maniar:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huber:Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH: Employment; Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Nagorsen:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership, Related to blinatumomab Patents & Royalties. Topp:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Assessment of Romiplostim Immunogenicity in Adult Patients in Clinical Trials and in a Global Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113484 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2427-2427 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Troy E. Barger ◽

Andy Boshier ◽

Vibha Jawa ◽

June Kim ◽

Daniel T. Mytych ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Lower Baseline ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Global Registry

Abstract Background: Romiplostim (Nplate®) is a thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist approved for the treatment of adult chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The formation of antibodies (Abs) against romiplostim may lead to a loss of response, and a theoretical risk exists that an immune response against romiplostim might lead to the formation of Abs that bind both romiplostim and native TPO. We therefore examined Abs against romiplostim and TPO in adult patients (pts) enrolled in clinical trials and in a global postmarketing registry based on spontaneously submitted requests for Ab testing. Methods: The clinical trial population included adult pts (age ≥18 years at screening) with ITP who received ≥1 dose of romiplostim in any of 13 completed romiplostim clinical trials, including phase 1 (n=1), phase 2 (n=3), phase 1/2 (n=1), phase 3 (n=5), and open-label extension (n=3) studies. Duration of romiplostim treatment varied among the trials. The postmarketing global registry population included romiplostim-treated adult pts with ITP who had blood samples sent for Ab testing. Serum samples from the clinical trials and the registry were assessed for romiplostim and TPO binding Abs in a surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based immunoassay, and samples positive for binding were assessed for neutralizing activity in a cell-based bioassay, as previously described (Jawa et al. Ann Hematol 2010). Pt characteristics were summarized for those who did and did not develop Abs in the clinical trials. Pts in the registry found to have romiplostim neutralizing Abs were to be followed every 3 months for up to 12 months. No formal statistical analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 1046 romiplostim-treated pts from clinical trials were available for analysis. At baseline, 958 pts had romiplostim Ab results: 35 pts (3.7%) were positive for binding Abs and 1 pt (0.1%) was positive for neutralizing Abs. Post-baseline, 961 pts had romiplostim Ab results: 80 pts (8.3%) were positive for binding Abs and 4 pts (0.4%) were positive for neutralizing Abs, independent of the baseline result. Sixty (6.2%) pts negative for anti-drug Abs at baseline developed romiplostim binding Abs during the clinical trials. Characteristics of the pts who did and did not develop romiplostim binding Abs are presented in Table 1. Development of romiplostim binding Abs was more frequent in pts with ITP duration >3 years at baseline (70.0% vs 57.4%), prior splenectomy (48.3% vs 37.5%), and a history of allergies (21.7% vs 8.4%). Pts who developed Abs also had lower baseline TPO levels (84.8 pg/mL vs 104.6 pg/mL), lower baseline platelet counts (12.5× 109/L vs 20.5 × 109/L), and a higher number of previous ITP treatments (median 3 vs 2). Four of the 60 pts with romiplostim binding Abs developed romiplostim neutralizing Abs after treatment (0.38% of 1046 pts overall; Table 2). The emergence of neutralizing Abs did not appear to be related to romiplostim dose or platelet count. The neutralizing Abs were directed against the peptide component of romiplostim and did not bind native TPO. Pts in the clinical trials were also tested for TPO Abs. At baseline, 956 pts had TPO Ab results: 31 pts (3.2%) were positive for TPO binding Abs and 1 pt (0.1%) was positive for neutralizing Abs. Post-baseline, 960 pts had TPO Ab results: 33 pts (3.4%) were positive for TPO binding Abs and no pts were positive for neutralizing Abs. Of the 184 adult pts in the registry, 9 (4.9%) were positive for binding Abs: 5 were positive for romiplostim binding, 2 for TPO binding, and 2 for romiplostim and TPO binding. No predose Ab results were available for these pts. One pt received romiplostim for 11 months at a dose of 2 µg/kg and then experienced an abrupt fall in platelet count even as romiplostim dose was increased to 10 µg/kg. The pt tested positive for romiplostim binding and neutralizing Abs. Romiplostim was discontinued, and the pt was switched to alternative therapy. Conclusions: An analysis of pts in 13 clinical trials shows that pts with indicators of more severe disease (longer duration of ITP, prior splenectomy, and a higher number of previous ITP treatments) may be at increased risk of developing romiplostim binding Abs. Development of romiplostim neutralizing Abs was uncommon in the clinical trials, and these Abs did not bind native TPO. Data from a postmarketing registry showed that the overall risk of clinically significant immunogenicity following exposure to romiplostim is low. Disclosures Barger: Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boshier:Sanofi: Other: rents a room to a Sanofi employee; Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mytych:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Park:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kuter:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dova Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; Principia: Research Funding; Protalex: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Research Funding; ONO: Consultancy; Syntimmune: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Imerge: A Study to Evaluate Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Transfusion-Dependent Subjects with IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) That Is Relapsed/Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Treatment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127435 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4248-4248 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Uwe Platzbecker ◽

David P. Steensma ◽

Koen Van Eygen ◽

Azra Raza ◽

Valeria Santini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

The Impact ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Background: Current treatment options for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent (TD) patients with lower risk (LR) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) relapsed after or refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have limited efficacy and durability; new approaches are needed. Imetelstat is a 13-mer lipid-conjugated oligonucleotide that targets the RNA template of human telomerase and is a competitive inhibitor of telomerase enzymatic activity (Asai et al, Cancer Res 2003; Herbert et al, Oncogene 2005). Preclinical, in vivo xenograft models (Dikmen et al, Cancer Res 2005; Hochreiter et al, Clin Cancer Res 2006) and preliminary clinical data from a pilot study conducted at Mayo Clinic (Tefferi et al, Blood Cancer Journal 2016) supported initiation of a study in TD LR MDS patients. A Phase 2 study of imetelstat, IMerge, demonstrated an 8-week RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) rate of 42%, 24-week RBC-TI rate of 29%, and 68% erythroid hematologic improvement (HI-E) rate in 38 heavily TD patients (median prior RBC transfusion burden 8 units / 8 weeks over the 16 weeks pre-study period) with LR MDS. Responses were durable with median duration of 8-week RBC-TI of 85.9 weeks by Kaplan Meier estimates (range 8.0-140.9) (Steensma ASH 2018, Fenaux EHA 2019). These Phase 2 results provided further evidence of potential clinical benefit of imetelstat treatment in TD LR MDS, and supported initiation of a Phase 3 trial. Methods: IMerge is two-part, Phase 2/3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02598661). The Phase 2 portion of the study described above is closed for enrollment. The Phase 3 portion of the study is open for enrollment of adult patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low or intermediate-1 risk, non-del(5q) MDS, who are TD, are relapsed after or refractory to ESAs, and have not received treatment with lenalidomide or hypomethylating agents. The study is a randomized (2:1) double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare efficacy of imetelstat vs. placebo that will enroll approximately 170 patients and will be conducted at approximately 90 centers in North America, Europe, Asia and Middle East. Imetelstat will be administered as 2-hour IV infusion every 4 weeks at 7.5 mg/kg. The primary endpoint of the study is to assess the rate of RBC-TI lasting ≥8 weeks. Secondary endpoints include safety, rate of RBC-TI ≥24 weeks, time to RBC-TI start, RBC-TI duration, rate of HI-E, the amount and relative change in RBC transfusions, rate of CR or PR, overall survival, progression of MDS, pharmacokinetics and effect of treatment on quality of life. Biomarkers relevant to the mechanism of action of imetelstat will be assessed to demonstrate target inhibition and their association with clinical responses. Cytogenetics and mutation analyses will be performed to evaluate the impact of imetelstat on reduction/depletion of malignant clones leading to disease modification. Disclosures Platzbecker: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Steensma:Astex: Consultancy; Arrowhead: Equity Ownership; Summer Road: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy; Aprea: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Stemline: Consultancy; H3 Biosciences: Other: Research funding to institution, not investigator.. Santini:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria; Acceleron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Menarini: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Germing:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Font:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Díez-Campelo:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Patnaik:Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sherman:Geron Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dougherty:Geron Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Feller:Geron Corporation: Employment. Sun:Geron Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wan:Geron Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huang:Geron Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rizo:Geron Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fenaux:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Astex: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Epidemiology of PNH and Real-World Treatment Patterns Following an Incident PNH Diagnosis in the US

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125867 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3407-3407 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jessica J Jalbert ◽

Umesh Chaudhari ◽

Haixin Zhang ◽

Jonathan Weyne ◽

Jamile M. Shammo

Keyword(s):

Incidence Rate ◽

Real World ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

The United States ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Procedure Codes ◽

Rbc Transfusion

Introduction: Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an acquired, life-threatening blood disease. While PNH is known to be a rare disease, the incidence and prevalence of the condition has been described only in a few small studies. In addition, while the International PNH registry is a rich source of data on real-world PNH patients globally, it is not possible to estimate the incidence and prevalence of PNH directly from the registry. As complement inhibitors are becoming the standard of care for PNH treatment, we also sought to explore how patients are managed following an incident PNH diagnosis. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence and prevalence of PNH and to describe real-world treatment patterns among patients newly diagnosed with PNH in the United States (US). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Truven US MarketScan Commercial/Medicare data (1 Jan 2015 to 30 June 2018), an employer-sponsored insurance claims database including annually approximately 30 million insured patients and their dependents' complete longitudinal records of inpatient services, outpatient services, and prescription drug claims covered under a variety of fee-for-service and capitated health plans. While these data are considered nationally representative of Americans with employer-provided health insurance, data come mainly from large employers. To estimate prevalence, we identified patients with ≥ 1 PNH diagnosis (ICD10: D59.5) among persons continually enrolled in the databases in 2017. To estimate incidence, we required ≥1-year of baseline enrolment and no PNH diagnosis or eculizumab exposure, identified using national drug codes [NDC] or procedure codes for drug administration, during the baseline period. Person-time accrued post-baseline until PNH diagnosis, end of study period, or disenrollment. We stratified incidence and prevalence estimates by age and sex and described patients with incident PNH in terms of demographics, comorbidities, and past-year healthcare resource utilization. Using Kaplan-Meier estimators, we estimated incidence of eculizumab initiation, timing of initiation, treatment duration, and risk of discontinuation/treatment holiday (>42 days between eculizumab exposures [i.e. 14-day exposure period + 28-day grace period between infusions], the equivalent of missing 2 infusions assuming a bi-weekly infusion schedule for eculizumab) following the incident PNH diagnosis. While accounting for censoring, we also investigated patterns of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, identified using procedure codes, in terms of incidence and timing of first transfusion following an incident PNH diagnosis. Results: The prevalence of PNH varied little between 2016 and 2017, from 12 to 13 per 1,000,000. The incidence rate over the study period was 5.7 per 1,000,000 person-years, representing 257 incident PNH cases. The incidence rate of PNH increased with age and was similar across sex. At diagnosis, mean age was 50.0 years (standard deviation [SD]: 18.6), 3.1% (8/257) were less than 18 years, 52.1% were women, 19.5% had a past-year diagnosis of aplastic anemia, 8.2% had a past-year diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome, 14.0% had a past-year RBC transfusion, and 31.5% had been hospitalized in the past-year. Over a mean follow-up time of 385.6 days (SD: 253.2), 10.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3-14.1%) of patients initiated eculizumab on average 60.5 days (SD: 55.9) from PNH diagnosis. At 1 year, about one third of patients discontinued eculizumab or had taken a treatment holiday; average treatment duration was 328.2 days (SD:245.4). Cumulative incidence of RBC transfusions at 6 months and 1 year was 14.6% (10.1-18.9%) and 17.4% (12.2-22.3%), respectively. On average, the first RBC transfusion occurred within 63.6 days (SD: 114.4) of an incident PNH diagnosis. Conclusions: In routine clinical practice, only a minority of patients recently diagnosed with PNH are initiated on eculizumab. Among PNH patients treated with eculizumab, less than 70% remain on treatment after 1 year. Findings must be interpreted in the context of limitations including lack of information on clone size, symptom burden, measures of disease activity, or bone marrow failure state which may affect treatment course. Future studies should explore factors affecting eculizumab initiation and persistence on treatment. Disclosures Jalbert: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chaudhari:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weyne:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shammo:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onconova: Research Funding; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Astex Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Influence of Karyotype On Overall Survival in Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treated with Azacitidine or a Conventional Care Regimen.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1755.1755 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1755-1755 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Ghulam J Mufti ◽

Steven D. Gore ◽

Valeria Santini ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Lewis R. Silverman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conventional Care ◽

Complex Karyotype ◽

Trisomy 8 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 1755 Poster Board I-781 Background Karyotypic abnormalities are common in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and specific chromosomal abnormalities are associated with poor prognosis. The phase III AZA-001 study (Lancet Oncol, 2009) showed azacitidine (AZA) prolonged overall survival (OS) regardless of IPSS cytogenetic risk category. This analysis assessed the effects of specific cytogenetic abnormalities on OS in patient (pt) subgroups treated with AZA or a conventional care regimen (CCR). Methods Pts with higher-risk MDS (FAB RAEB, RAEB-t, or CMML and IPSS Int-2 or High) were enrolled and randomized to receive AZA or CCR. CCR comprised 3 treatments: best supportive care only, low-dose ara-C, or induction chemotherapy. Erythropoietins were prohibited. OS was determined in subgroups of pts with del 5/5q-, del 7/7q-, or trisomy 8, each as part of a non-complex karyotype (<3 cytogenetic abnormalities) or as part of a complex karyotype (≥3 cytogenetic abnormalities). OS was also analyzed in pts with combinations of del 5/5q- and/or del 7/7q- as part of non-complex or complex karyotypes (Table). Pt karyotype was determined at baseline. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. A stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 358 pts were enrolled (AZA 179, CCR 179). Of them, 153 had normal karyotypes (AZA 77, CCR 76). Median OS in pts with normal karyotypes was not reached at 21.1 months with AZA vs 17.2 months (95%CI: 15.2 – 24.1 months) with CCR; HR = 0.63 (95%CI: 0.39 – 1.03). Of remaining pts, 136 had del 5/5q-, del 7/7q-, and/or trisomy 8 as part of a non-complex or complex karyotype. AZA was associated with longer OS vs CCR in all subgroups of pts with non-complex cytogenetics, with HRs ranging from 0.20 (95%CI: 0.06 – 0.65) to 0.51 (95%CI: 0.05 – 4.74) (Table). In both the AZA and CCR treatment groups, pts in all subgroups with non-complex karyotypes had substantially longer OS than pts with complex karyotypes. Pts with complex karyotypes in some subgroups had longer OS with AZA vs CCR: median OS in pts with del 5/5q-, del 5/5q- WITHOUT del 7/7q-, or trisomy 8 as part of a complex karyotype treated with AZA survived 5.1, 8.0, and 12.4 months longer, respectively, than their counterparts who received CCR. HRs with AZA vs CCR in pts with complex cytogenetics ranged from 0.42 (95%CI: 0.10 – 1.69) to 0.55 (95%CI: 0.29 – 1.05). Conclusions These findings support earlier data showing effectiveness of AZA in higher-risk MDS pts with complex or non-complex karyotypes. Major gains in OS were obtained with AZA vs CCR (12-18 months longer OS with AZA) for the following categories: del 7/7q- (non-complex), del 7/7q- WITHOUT del 5/5q- (non-complex), and trisomy 8 (non-complex and complex). Pts with trisomy 8 treated with AZA experienced a 3-fold increase in median OS compared with similar pts who received CCR. Longer OS (AZA 15.3 vs CCR 7.3 months) was also obtained for pts with del5/5q- WITHOUT del7/7q- as part of a complex karyotype. The worse cytogenetic categories, del 7/7q- and del 5/5q- AND del 7/7q-, both with complex karyotype, were associated with the poorest OS regardless of treatment. Pt subgroups in this post hoc analysis were small and heterogeneous; confirmation of these findings in larger pt samples is warranted. Disclosures Mufti: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding. Santini:Celgene: Honoraria. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cephalon: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Epicept: Honoraria, Research Funding. Skikne:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hellstrom-Lindberg:Celgene: Research Funding. Seymour:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Beach:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Backstrom:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fernando:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text