Immunogenicity of BAX 855 in Previously Treated Patients with Congenital Severe Hemophilia Α

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2594-2594
Author(s):  
Frank Michael Horling ◽  
Peter Allacher ◽  
Herwig Koppensteiner ◽  
Werner Engl ◽  
Fritz Scheiflinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Background and objectives BAX 855 (Antihemophilic Factor [Recombinant] pegylated, rurioctocog alfa pegol) is an extended half-life (EHL) recombinant human coagulation factor VIII (rFVIII) modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG) (Turecek et al., 2012). It was recently approved in the US and Japan for on-demand treatment of bleeding events and for prophylactic treatment for patients with congenital severe hemophilia A. The efficacy and safety of BAX 855 were extensively studied during clinical development of this compound (Konkle et al., 2015). The assessment of BAX855 immunogenicity was of particular interest because the development of neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) is the most serious complication following replacement therapies with FVIII products. FVIII inhibitors develop in about 20-32% of previously untreated patients (Gouw SC et al., 2013) and with a rate of 1.55- 3.8 per 1000 patients per year in previously treated patients (Kempton CL, 2010) with severe hemophilia A. To fully understand the potential of BAX855 to induce antibody responses, both FVIII inhibitors and total FVIII-binding antibodies were assessed. Furthermore, potential antibody development against PEG-FVIII, PEG and CHO proteins was investigated. Methods The clinical protocols (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02585960, NCT02210091, NCT01736475, NCT01913405, NCT01945593, NCT01599819, NCT02615691) and the methods used for antibody analytics (Whelan et al 2013; Lubich et al 2016) were previously described. ELISA technologies were used for the analysis of total binding antibodies, the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay was used for the detection of FVIII inhibitors. Correlation analyses were done to assess any potential correlation between the development of antibodies and potential adverse events. Results None of the 243 subjects (6 PUPs and 237 PTPs) included in the analysis developed FVIII inhibitors (≥ 0.6 BU/mL) A total of 44 subjects tested positive for binding antibodies against FVIII, PEG-FVIII or PEG at single time points. 28 of these 44 subjects showed pre-existing antibodies against FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG prior to first exposure to BAX 855, which disappeared during the study. 13 subjects who tested negative at screening developed transient antibodies against FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG at one or two consecutive study visits after exposure to BAX 855. Antibodies were transient and not detectable at subsequent visits or at completion of the study. Five subjects showed positive results for binding antibodies at study completion or at the time of the data cutoff. No conclusion can be drawn whether these antibodies are of transient or persistent nature. There was no confirmed causal relationship between the appearance of binding antibodies against FVIII, PEG or PEG-FVIII and adverse events, nor was there an impact on hemostatic efficacy in any of the 44subjects. No subject had pre-existing antibodies or developed de novo antibodies to CHO proteins during the study at any time point. Conclusion Our data indicate that BAX855 did not show an increased risk for PTPs to develop FVIII inhibitors. We did not see any FVIII inhibitor development in PUPs, but the small number of overall exposures does not allow general conclusions for PUPs. Importantly, the data suggest that BAX855 did not induce immune responses associated with impaired treatment efficacy or with altered PK parameters. Disclosures Horling: Shire: Employment. Allacher:IMC Krems: Research Funding. Koppensteiner:Shire: Employment. Engl:Shire, formerly Baxalta and Baxter: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheiflinger:Shire: Employment, Research Funding. Abbuehl:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment. Reipert:Shire: Employment.

scholarly journals 99.3% of Inhibitors in Severe Hemophilia a Develop before Exposure Day 75. Time to Change Definition of Previously Treated Patients; Data from 1038 Patients with Severe Hemophilia a of the Pednet Registry

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2472-2472
Author(s):  
Marijke Van den Berg ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Herve Chambost ◽  
Karin Kurnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Introduction.In patients with hemophilia treated with factor VIII products, the development of inhibitory antibodies poses the largest safety risk. Especially during the first 50 exposure days (EDs), up to 37% of patients with severe hemophilia A have been reported to develop an inhibitor. To study neo-immunogenicity of products and new treatment strategies, patients have been distinguished into previously untreated (PUPs) and previously treated patients (PTPs); the latter defined as patients treated for more than 150 EDs. The number of 150 EDs was established in the eighties during a time when most patients received on-demand treatment and testing for inhibitors was not frequently performed. More recent studies on inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe hemophilia A report that 50% of inhibitors develop within 14-15 EDs, however the cut-off number of EDs for a PUP to become a PTP is not well defined. The aim of this study was to define the number of EDs for PUPs to become PTPs based on long-term follow-up of patients with severe hemophilia A Methods.All patients with severe hemophilia A born after January 1, 2000, treated for at least 1 ED and followed prospectively until inhibitor development or the number of EDs at last follow-up, were included. The number of EDs at inhibitor development is the last exposure day before the first positive titer was reported. An inhibitor was defined as positive when at least two positive inhibitor titers were measured. Positivity was defined according to the cut-off level in each individual center's laboratory. Results.Of 1,038 PUPs with severe hemophilia A, 930 (89.6%) were followed until 75 EDs, 429 until 500 EDs and 212 until 1000 EDs. In total, 300 inhibitors developed, of which 298 (99.3%) within the first 75 EDs. Thereafter only two inhibitors developed, both low titer: after 249 and 264 EDs. Conclusion.Almost all inhibitors develop during the first 75 EDs. Patients with severe hemophilia A can be defined as PTP after 75 instead of 150 exposure days. A change of definition of PTP will increase the number of severe hemophilia A patients eligible for new therapies. Disclosures Santagostino: Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Male:SOBI: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liesner:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: Clinical study investigator for NuProtect Study (Octapharma sponsored), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Carcao:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL-Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nolan:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Álvarez-Roman:Shire: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy. Koenigs:Gilead: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Intersero: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Roche/Chugai: Consultancy; EU (IMI, FP7): Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jansen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals ASPIRE Final Results Confirm Established Safety and Sustained Efficacy for Up to 4 Years of Treatment With rFVIIIFc in Previously Treated Subjects With Severe Hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1192-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Nolan ◽  
Johnny Mahlangu ◽  
Guy Young ◽  
Barbara A Konkle ◽  
K. John Pasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Introduction: Prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is the standard of care in hemophilia A, given its natural mechanism of action, strict homeostatic regulation, and consistent safety profile. Recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) is an extended half-life therapy that demonstrated safety and efficacy in previously treated pediatric, adolescent, and adult subjects with severe hemophilia A in the Phase 3 A-LONG and Kids A-LONG trials (NCT01181128 and NCT01458106, respectively) (Young et al, J Thromb Haemostas, 2015; Mahlangu et al, Blood, 2014). Herein, the final results are reported from ASPIRE (NCT01454739), the long-term extension trial of those 2 studies. Methods: This was an open-label, multicenter, long-term trial of previously treated subjects of all ages with severe hemophilia A. Subjects received 1 of the 4 following regimens: individualized prophylaxis (IP; rFVIIIFc 25‒60 IU/kg every 3-5 days, or twice weekly), weekly prophylaxis (WP; rFVIIIFc 65 IU/kg every 7 days), modified prophylaxis (MP; personalized dosing), or episodic treatment (ET; on-demand dosing based on bleeding episodes). Subjects <12 years of age were eligible for only IP or MP. Investigators could switch a subject's treatment group at any time; therefore, each subject may appear in >1 treatment group. The primary endpoint was development of inhibitors. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), joint ABRs, spontaneous joint ABRs, exposure days (ED), and factor consumption. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Analyses were performed separately based on parent study. Results: A total of 211 subjects (150 were from A-LONG and 61 were from Kids A-LONG) enrolled in ASPIRE, and 186 subjects (132 from A-LONG and 54 from Kids A-LONG) completed the study. Subjects from Kids A-LONG had a median (range) age of 6.0 (2-12) years. Of the subjects from the A-LONG study enrolled to ASPIRE, the median (range) age was 31.0 (13-66) years. Most subjects received IP regardless of parent study (Kids A-LONG: IP [n=59], MP [n=3]; A-LONG: IP [n=110], WP [n=27], MP [n=21], ET [n=13]). No inhibitors were observed throughout the study, and the overall safety profile of rFVIIIFc was consistent with the parent studies and prior interim analyses. ABRs remained low throughout the entirety of ASPIRE in subjects prescribed IP (Table 1). For subjects from the Kids A-LONG study, the median (range) number of ED during ASPIRE was 332.0 (18.0-467.0) days. Total median (range) treatment duration was 166.6 (14.4-203.0) weeks. The median (range) number of ED for A-LONG subjects was 267.5 (8.0-660.0) days. Total median treatment duration was 201.4 (5.1-274.6) weeks. Overall, the median (range) duration of treatment with rFVIIIFc was 4.1 (0.4, 5.9) years. From the end of the parent study to the end of ASPIRE, the rFVIIIFc dosing interval increased for 6.6% and 21.1% of subjects from Kids A-LONG and A-LONG, respectively (Table 2). There was no change in median weekly factor consumption from the end of either parent study to the end of ASPIRE. For subjects from Kids A-LONG, the median (IQR) was 0.0 (0.0‒3.2), while the median (IQR) for those from A-LONG was 0.0 (0.0‒0.0). Conclusions: Throughout up to 4 years of treatment with rFVIIIFc in the ASPIRE extension study, no inhibitors were reported, and low ABRs and extended dosing intervals were sustained. These data are consistent with the well-characterized safety profile and durable efficacy of rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in previously treated subjects of all ages with hemophilia A. Disclosures Nolan: Bayer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding. Mahlangu:Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Consultancy; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Biomarin: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; LFB: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding. Young:Bayer: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kedrion: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria. Konkle:Sangamo: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding. Pasi:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Biomarin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Honoraria, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Speakers Bureau; Catalyst Bio: Honoraria; Apcintex: Honoraria. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nogami:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Anti-FIXa/X bispecific antibodies , Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tripkovic:Sobi: Employment. Rudin:Bioverativ: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety Results from a Phase 3b, Open-Label, Multicenter, Continuation Study of Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol for Prophylaxis in Previously Treated Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2483-2483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S. Mullins ◽  
Barbara A Konkle ◽  
Catherine E. McGuinn ◽  
Werner Engl ◽  
Srilatha D. Tangada
Keyword(s):  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Recombinant Fviii

Abstract Background: Patients with severe hemophilia A experience substantial morbidity and mortality due to frequent spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes, especially in joints. Prophylaxis with standard half-life factor VIII (FVIII) is the standard of care to prevent bleeds. Extended half-life products benefit patients by reducing the number of infusions without impacting the treatment efficacy. Methods: This phase 3b, prospective, open-label, multicenter, continuation study (NCT# 01945593) investigated the safety and efficacy of a PEGylated recombinant FVIII with an extended half-life, rurioctocog alfa pegol (SHP660, BAX 855, ADYNOVATE®, Shire, Lexington, MA, USA), for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A (FVIII <1%). Eligible children and adults were ≤75 years of age and had either completed a previous rurioctocog alfa pegol study (NCT# 01599819, 01736475, 02210091, 02615691, 01913405, or 02585960) and were willing to immediately transition to the continuation study, or were naïve to rurioctocog alfa pegol but had received treatment with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII for ≥150 (in patients ≥6 years of age) or ≥50 (in patients <6 years of age) exposure days. Patients received prophylactic rurioctocog alfa pegol at least twice weekly, either at a fixed dose (FD; 45 ± 5 IU/kg in patients ≥12 years of age; 50 ± 10 IU/kg in those <12 years of age; dose adjustment ≤80 ± 5 IU/kg allowed) or with pharmacokinetically (PK)-tailored dosing (≤80 ± 5 IU/kg) to maintain FVIII trough levels ≥3%. The co-primary endpoints assessed were the incidence of FVIII inhibitory antibody development (as measured by ≥0.6 BU in the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay) and the spontaneous annualized bleed rate (ABR). Secondary endpoints included overall hemostatic efficacy ratings and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Results: The study began in October 2013 and completed in March 2018. Overall, 216 patients receiving prophylaxis were eligible and included in the safety/full analysis dataset (≥1 dose received). Of these, 215 were male, the mean (SD) age at enrollment was 22.8 (15.7) years, the mean (SD) number of documented previous rurioctocog alfa pegol exposure days was 57.0 (39.6), the total ABR over 3-6 months prior to enrollment in the continuation study (including patients naïve to rurioctocog alfa pegol or receiving on-demand or prophylactic treatment with rurioctocog alfa pegol) was mean (SD) 4.7 (12.6), median (range) 0.0 (0-69). Most patients (206; 95.4%) had participated in a previous rurioctocog alfa pegol study. Overall, 215 patients received ≥1 dose in the FD regimen and 25 received ≥1 dose in the PK regimen. These patients received a mean (SD) of 1.72 (0.29) and 2.11 (0.61) prophylactic infusions per week, respectively, with a mean (SD) dose per infusion of 51.15 (8.11) IU/kg and 52.14 (17.03) IU/kg, respectively. None of the patients developed a confirmed FVIII inhibitor in this study and only 1 treatment-related allergic or hypersensitivity reaction (a nonserious mild AE) was reported. Nonserious AEs assessed by the investigators to be related to treatment occurred in 11/216 (5.1%) patients. Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 33 (15.3%) patients; there were no SAEs assessed by the investigators to be related to treatment. Descriptive statistics on spontaneous, joint, and total ABR by prophylactic regimen are shown in the Table. The overall total ABR in all patients was mean (SD) 2.5 (3.1), median (range) 1.6 (0.0-19.5). Overall hemostatic efficacy was rated as good or excellent in 88.5% of all bleeds and 89.4% of all bleeds were treated with 1 or 2 infusions. Conclusions: These results show that in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A, rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis in FD- and PK-tailored regimens was well tolerated and effective. None of the patients developed FVIII inhibitory antibodies, and a decrease in mean total ABR was reported in these patients compared with baseline. Disclosures Mullins: Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Konkle:Genentech: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Sangamo: Research Funding. McGuinn:CSL Behring: Consultancy; BioMarin: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Shire: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Engl:Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tangada:Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Latest Results From The PUP-GCP Clinical Trial: A Low Inhibitor Rate In Previously Untreated Patients With Severe Hemophilia A Treated With Octanate

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3596-3596
Author(s):  
Anna Klukowska ◽  
Martina Jansen ◽  
Vladimir Komrska ◽  
Pawel Laguna ◽  
Vladimir Vdovin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Observational Period ◽  
Adverse Event Profile ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Bleeding Episodes

Abstract Background Octanate is a highly purified, double virus inactivated, human plasma-derived factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate with all coagulation FVIII bound to its natural stabilizer VWF in a VWF:RCo/FVIII:C ratio of approximately 0.4. Five prospective GCP studies with octanate were conducted in 77 previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A. None of these 77 PTPs developed an inhibitor while treated exclusively with octanate. Aim To assess the immunogenicity in previously untreated patients (PUPs), a prospective clinical trial has been initiated in 2000. This included 50 PUPs with severe hemophilia A for an observational period of 100 exposure days with octanate, for at least 6 months. Methods Patients with severe hemophilia A without previous exposure to FVIII or FVIII-containing products were enrolled. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed by a 4-point verbal rating scale. Inhibitors were assessed according to modified Bethesda method prior to treatment every 3-4 exposure days (ED 1-20), and after treatment every 10 EDs (ED 21-100), but at minimum every three months. Results Two of 50 (4%) subjects developed clinically relevant inhibitor titers over the course of the study. Another two displayed inhibitors that disappeared spontaneously without change of dose or dosing interval. All inhibitors developed under on-demand treatment and before ED 50. From the 50 subjects, 42 had exceeded 50 EDs at the time of this analysis. Octanate was well-tolerated and the adverse event profile was consistent with the population studied. The hemostatic efficacy in prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes was generally rated as “excellent” and no complication was reported for any surgical treatment. Conclusion Despite frequent inhibitor testing and predominant on-demand treatment, the data indicate a low overall inhibitor rate for octanate in patients who exceeded 50 exposure days (4/42) of which only 2 (4.8%) were clinically relevant. Disclosures: Klukowska: Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Jansen:Octapharma AG: Employment. Komrska:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Laguna:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Vdovin:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Knaub:Octapharma AG: Employment.

Towards the Care of Hemophilia a Patients Using Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC)-Derived Megakaryocytes (iMks) Expressing Coagulation Factor (F) VIII

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2266-2266
Author(s):  
Randolph B Lyde ◽  
Li Zhai ◽  
Karen Vo ◽  
Danuta Jadwiga Jarocha ◽  
Spencer Sullivan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Blood ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Specific Activity ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Clot Formation ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Furin Cleavage ◽  
Furin Cleavage Site

Abstract We and others have shown that FVIII expressed ectopically in platelets (pFVIII) is stored in α-granules, released at sites of vascular injury and restores hemostasis in FVIIInull mice, even in the presence of neutralizing antibodies to FVIII. These studies support the concept that unlike therapeutic interventions that correct plasma FVIII, pFVIII may be a useful therapy in hemophilia A with intractable inhibitors and significant bleeds. We have also demonstrated this approach has several limitations that may make pFVIII gene therapy bone marrow transplantation (BMT) strategies problematic: 1) pFVIII is not equivalent to plasma FVIII and its efficacy in joint and intracranial bleeds has yet to be shown, especially in the presence of inhibitors, and 2) pFVIII expressed during megakaryopoiesis can cause injury to the Mks, potentially exacerbating post-BMT thrombocytopenia. We propose an alternative strategy: interval prophylactic infusions of FVIII-containing platelets generated from patient-specific iMks expressing either human B-domain-deleted (BDD) FVIII or variants of this FVIII that have greater stability and longer half-lives; making them especially efficacious as pFVIII as we previously demonstrated. iPSCs are a renewable source of cells that can be pre-screened prior to clinical usage for lines that express optimal levels of pFVIII and also release optimal numbers of platelets after differentiation into iMks. Such iPSCs were transfected with a self-inactivating lentivirus containing cDNA for one of three FVIII variants: wildtype BDD FVIII (WT FVIII), R1645H PACE/furin cleavage site FVIII (FVIIIR1645H), and amino acid 1645 to 1648 deletion FVIII (FVIIIΔ). FVIIIR1645H and FVIIIΔ show greater stability and consequently greater specific activity with no increase in injuring Mks. All FVIII variants were expressed using the MK-specific Cxcl4 promoter and were shown to be effective in several bleeding models in FVIIInull mice. Differentiated and transduced iMKs were analyzed for RNA and protein expression. All of the FVIII variant iMKs expressed at least forty-fold higher levels of mRNA compared to the non-transduced control (n=6) and protein was expressed at >550 pg/106 CD42b+ iMKs (n=6). Transduced MKs released FVIII into the supernatant when activated by thrombin showing the pFVIII was likely stored in α-granules. Annexin staining was the same between FVIII-expressing iMKs and control iMks suggesting that the level of pFVIII did not cause the iMks to become apoptotic. To test the ability of FVIII-expressing iMKs to correct the coagulopathy in hemophilia A, 5x105 iMKs were added to FVIIInull murine whole blood and evaluated for clot formation using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Each FVIII variant showed a decrease in clotting time, clot formation time, and an increase in maximum clot firmness when compared to the non-transduced control (n=4). These data show that iMKs expressing FVIII variants can improve hemostasis in a whole blood clotting assay. Our next goal is to generate sufficient platelets from these iMKs to test for correction of the bleeding diathesis in immunodeficient FVIIInull mice and to determine their efficacy in improving hemostasis in a number of clinically relevant hemostatic models. Disclosures Arruda: Pfizer: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Spark Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties. Camire:Pfizer: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Research Funding; Spark Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Efficacy safety and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylactic treatment in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1049
Author(s):  
Bendix Samarta Witarto ◽  
Visuddho Visuddho ◽  
Andro Pramana Witarto ◽  
Henry Sutanto ◽  
Bayu Satria Wiratama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Bleeding Prophylaxis ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated

Background: Patients with severe hemophilia often present with painful joint and soft tissue bleeding which may restrict them from their daily activities. The current standard of care still relies on a regular prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII), which has a high daily treatment burden. Recently, rurioctocog alfa pegol, a third-generation recombinant FVIII with a modification in its polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, has been developed. Several trials have studied this synthetic drug as bleeding prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: This study was conducted in conformity with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, and CINAHL (via EBSCOhost). Study qualities were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Modified Jadad scales. Results: Four studies involving 517 previously treated severe hemophilia A patients were included in this study. The pooled mean of total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and hemostatic efficacy was 2.59 (95% CI = 2.04–3.14) and 92% (95% CI = 85%–97%), respectively. Only 30 (2.3%) non-serious and one (1.4%) serious adverse events were considered related to rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment. At the end of the studies, no development of FVIII inhibitory antibodies was observed. None of the developed binding antibodies to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG was correlated to the treatment efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Despite the limited availability of direct comparison studies, our analyses indicate that rurioctocog alfa pegol could serve as a safe and effective alternative for bleeding prophylaxis in previously treated hemophilia A patients. Moreover, it appears to have low immunogenicity, which further increases the safety profile of the drug in such clinical conditions.

Surgery with Turoctocog Alfa: Efficacy and Safety in Bleeding Prevention During Surgical Procedures - Results From the guardian™ Trials.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2228-2228
Author(s):  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Steven R. Lentz ◽  
Mudi Misgav ◽  
Brigitte Brand ◽  
Pratima Chowdary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Surgical Bleeding ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Hemostatic Efficacy ◽  
The Guardian ◽  
Extension Trial

Abstract Abstract 2228 Introduction: Novo Nordisk is developing turoctocog alfa, a human third generation recombinant FVIII for treatment of hemophilia A. During the pivotal trial in adult and adolescent previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A (guardian™1), subjects in need of surgery were able to participate in a subtrial to document efficacy and safety of turoctocog alfa in prevention of surgical bleeding. Pediatric (<12 years of age) previously treated patients in the guardian™3 trial were allowed to undergo minor surgery if needed during the trial. In addition, after completing these initial trials subjects were allowed to continue treatment with turoctocog alfa in the extension trial (guardian™2) which also includes a subtrial to document efficacy and safety of turoctocog alfa in prevention of surgical bleeding. Methods: We here describe surgeries performed within the guardian trials. For the ongoing guardian™2 extension trial, only cases included in the interim analysis (data cut-off 21NOV2011) are included. Results: In all, results from 10 major and 3 minor surgeries are included. Surgery indication was related to hemophilia joint disease in 8/13 cases. The hemostatic efficacy during and after surgery was rated on a 4-point scale (excellent, good, moderate and none) by the Investigator and/or Surgeon. Details and outcome of the individual surgeries performed are presented in Table 1. In addition, there were no safety concerns. Discussion: Prevention of surgical bleeding is an important aspect of hemophilia treatment. In the present 13 surgeries, including all surgeries performed with turoctocog alfa in the phase 3 guardian™ trials, hemostatic efficacy during and after was rated as either excellent or good in each case. The results support that turoctocog alfa has an excellent safety and efficacy profile for use in hemophilia A. Disclosures: Santagostino: Novo Nordisk and Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer, Baxter, Bayer, CSL Behring, Kedrion, Grifols and Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Bayer, Baxter, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Biotest, Kedrion and Grifols: Speakers Bureau. Lentz:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding. Brand:Bayer: Travel support, Travel support Other; Novo Nordisk, Baxter, Pfizer: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria. Chowdary:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy. Savic:Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau. Lindblom:Novo Nordisk A/S: Employment.

scholarly journals Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for prophylactic treatment in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1049
Author(s):  
Bendix Samarta Witarto ◽  
Visuddho Visuddho ◽  
Andro Pramana Witarto ◽  
Henry Sutanto ◽  
Bayu Satria Wiratama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Bleeding Prophylaxis ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated

Background: Patients with severe hemophilia often present with painful joint and soft tissue bleeding which may restrict them from their daily activities. The current standard of care still relies on a regular prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII), which has a high daily treatment burden. Recently, rurioctocog alfa pegol, a third-generation recombinant FVIII with a modification in its polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, has been developed. Several trials have studied this synthetic drug as bleeding prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: This study was conducted in conformity with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, and CINAHL (via EBSCOhost). Study qualities were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Modified Jadad scales. Results: Four studies involving 517 previously treated severe hemophilia A patients were included in this study. The pooled mean of total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and hemostatic efficacy was 2.59 (95% CI = 2.04–3.14) and 92% (95% CI = 85%–97%), respectively. Only 30 (2.3%) non-serious and one (1.4%) serious adverse events were considered related to rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment. At the end of the studies, no development of FVIII inhibitory antibodies was observed. None of the developed binding antibodies to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG was correlated to the treatment efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Despite the limited availability of direct comparison studies, our analyses indicate that rurioctocog alfa pegol could serve as a safe and effective alternative for bleeding prophylaxis in previously treated hemophilia A patients. Moreover, it appears to have low immunogenicity, which further increases the safety profile of the drug in such clinical conditions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document