Latest Results From The PUP-GCP Clinical Trial: A Low Inhibitor Rate In Previously Untreated Patients With Severe Hemophilia A Treated With Octanate

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3596-3596
Author(s):  
Anna Klukowska ◽  
Martina Jansen ◽  
Vladimir Komrska ◽  
Pawel Laguna ◽  
Vladimir Vdovin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Octanate is a highly purified, double virus inactivated, human plasma-derived factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate with all coagulation FVIII bound to its natural stabilizer VWF in a VWF:RCo/FVIII:C ratio of approximately 0.4. Five prospective GCP studies with octanate were conducted in 77 previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A. None of these 77 PTPs developed an inhibitor while treated exclusively with octanate. Aim To assess the immunogenicity in previously untreated patients (PUPs), a prospective clinical trial has been initiated in 2000. This included 50 PUPs with severe hemophilia A for an observational period of 100 exposure days with octanate, for at least 6 months. Methods Patients with severe hemophilia A without previous exposure to FVIII or FVIII-containing products were enrolled. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed by a 4-point verbal rating scale. Inhibitors were assessed according to modified Bethesda method prior to treatment every 3-4 exposure days (ED 1-20), and after treatment every 10 EDs (ED 21-100), but at minimum every three months. Results Two of 50 (4%) subjects developed clinically relevant inhibitor titers over the course of the study. Another two displayed inhibitors that disappeared spontaneously without change of dose or dosing interval. All inhibitors developed under on-demand treatment and before ED 50. From the 50 subjects, 42 had exceeded 50 EDs at the time of this analysis. Octanate was well-tolerated and the adverse event profile was consistent with the population studied. The hemostatic efficacy in prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes was generally rated as “excellent” and no complication was reported for any surgical treatment. Conclusion Despite frequent inhibitor testing and predominant on-demand treatment, the data indicate a low overall inhibitor rate for octanate in patients who exceeded 50 exposure days (4/42) of which only 2 (4.8%) were clinically relevant. Disclosures: Klukowska: Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Jansen:Octapharma AG: Employment. Komrska:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Laguna:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Vdovin:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Knaub:Octapharma AG: Employment.

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5051-5051
Author(s):  
Sigurd Knaub ◽  
Anna Klukowska ◽  
Vladimir Komrska ◽  
Pawel Laguna ◽  
Vdovin Vladimir ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : Octanate is a highly purified, double virus inactivated, human plasma-derived factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate with all coagulation FVIII bound to its natural stabilizer VWF in a VWF:RCo/FVIII:C ratio of approximately 0.4. A prospective clinical trial has been initiated in 2000 in order to assess the immunogenicity, efficacy and tolerability of Octanate in previously untreated patients (PUPs). Materials and Methods: Patients with severe hemophilia A without previous exposure to FVIII or FVIII-containing products were enrolled. Inhibitor screening, using the modified Bethesda method, was performed prior to treatment, starting every 3-4 EDs (ED 1-20), and afterwards every 10 EDs (ED 21-100), but at least every three months. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed by a 4-point verbal rating scale. Results: The study is clinically completed, after fifty-one subjects with severe haemophilia A, at screening 0,01-5,61 years old (median 0,65 years; median 0,99 years at treatment start) have been enrolled. Three of them developed clinically relevant high titer inhibitors over the course of the study. Another two displayed transient inhibitors that disappeared spontaneously without changing the dose or dosing interval. All inhibitors developed under on-demand treatment and before ED 50. For 4 inhibitor patients an intron 22 inversion, for 1 inhibitor patient a large deletion of exons 7 – 12 was found. From 51 subjects, 45 exceeded 50 EDs. Octanate was well-tolerated and the adverse event profile was consistent with the population studied. The haemostatic efficacy in prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes was generally rated as “excellent” and no complication was reported for any surgical treatment. Conclusion: Despite frequent inhibitor testing and predominant on-demand treatment, the data indicate a low overall inhibitor rate for Octanate in patients who exceeded 50 EDs (5/45) of which only 3 (6.7%) were clinically relevant. Disclosures Knaub: Octapharma AG: Employment. Klukowska:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Komrska:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Laguna:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Vladimir:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Jansen:Octapharma AG: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1121-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uriel Martinowitz ◽  
Aaron Lubetsky ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Gantcho Jotov ◽  
Jacob Luboshitz ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1121 Factor IX (FIX) replacement therapy is the standard of care for patients with haemophilia B. FIX products currently available have a relatively short half-life, requiring 2–3 times a week intravenous prophylactic treatment to achieve a significant bleeding reduction. A recombinant FIX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) was generated by genetic fusion of human recombinant albumin to rFIX to extend the half life of FIX. A Phase I/II open-label, multicenter, clinical study of rIX-FP has been completed in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia B (FIX ≤ 2%) as part of the PROLONG - 9FP clinical developmental program. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the prevention of bleeding episodes during once weekly prophylaxis and to assess the hemostatic efficacy of rIX-FP for the treatment of bleeding, in addition to safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments. The study consisted of a 10 to 14 day PK evaluation period, and a 3 to 12 month safety and efficacy evaluation period, during which subjects received either on-demand or prophylaxis treatment. Subjects receiving weekly prophylactic treatment were initially treated with a dose based upon the subject's PK profile, bleeding phenotype, and physical activity level. The dose could be adjusted based on clinical outcome, while maintaining a 7 day treatment interval. Subjects receiving on-demand treatment were treated with a dose based upon the subject's PK profile and WFH recommendations for treatment of bleeding episodes. Seventeen study subjects from hemophilia treatment centers in Israel and Bulgaria participated in the study, 13 of whom received weekly prophylaxis treatment and 4 of whom received on-demand treatment. Following a single infusion of 25 IU/kg rIX-FP (n=13), the PK parameters (t1/2 = 94 hrs, AUC0-inf= 3414 hr*IU/dL) were comparable to those previously reported from the Phase I study (Blood prepublished Aug 2, 2012). In addition, rIX-FP maintained a baseline-corrected mean trough level of 3.8% and 2.7% at Day 7 and Day 14, respectively, after 25 IU/kg rIX-FP administration. There were no AEs considered as possibly related to rIX-FP. There were no allergic reactions, inhibitors to FIX or antibodies to rIX-FP reported. All 10 prophylaxis subjects who were previously receiving routine prophylaxis with FIX were maintained successfully on weekly treatment with rIX-FP for the entire study. Furthermore, three prophylaxis subjects who were previously treated on-demand were maintained successfully on weekly prophylaxis treatment with rIX-FP with at least 85% reduction in the annualized spontaneous and total bleeding rate compared to the annualized bleeding rate prior to study entry. All of the bleeding events were treated successfully, including approximately 90% of the events with a single infusion of rIX-FP. The mean weekly product consumption of rIX-FP (IUs) was reduced compared to the consumption of the previous FIX product (IUs). No subject was withdrawn from the study due to safety concerns or lack of hemostatic efficacy. This Phase I/II study has demonstrated the clinical efficacy of rIX-FP for once weekly routine prophylaxis to prevent spontaneous bleeding episodes and treatment of bleeding episodes, in addition to the excellent safety characteristics and improved PK profile. A detailed analysis of the efficacy of weekly routine prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes, improved PK and safety properties of rIX-FP will be presented. Disclosures: Martinowitz: CSL Behring: Honoraria, Investigator for CSL clinical study of rIX-FP Other. Lubetsky:CSL Behring: Investigator for CSL clinical trial of rIX-FP Other. Santagostino:CSL Behring: Honoraria, Investigator for CSL Behring clinical trial of rIX-FP Other, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jotov:CSL Behring: sub-investigator for CSL clinical trial of rIX-FP Other. Barazani-Brutman:CSL Behring: study coordinator for CSL Behring clinical trial of rIX-FP Other. Voigt:CSL Behring: Employment. Moises:CSL Behring: Employment. Jacobs:CSL Behring: Employment. Lissitchkov:CSL Behring: Investigator for CSL Behgring clinical trial of rIX-FP Other.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4703-4703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Shiller ◽  
Vladimir Vdovin ◽  
Victor Petrov ◽  
Pavel Svirin ◽  
Tatiana Andreeva ◽  
...  

Abstract Efficacy and safety of a new domestically produced rFVIII-BDD (moroctocog alfa, Octofactor, CJSC "GENERIUM", Russia) was investigated in a controlled, open, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. After screening and a 4-days washout period 12 previously treated patients adolescents (age 12-18 years old) with severe hemophilia A (the activity of FVIII was less than 1%) were included in the clinical trial. The patients were given the moroctocog alfa as prophylactic treatment in a dose of 35±5 ME/kg 3 times per week during 21±1 weeks. Before participation in this clinical trial 2 pts had received treatment with another recombinant FVIII, 2 pts had therapy with pdFVIII and 8 pts had been treated with rFVIII and pdFVIII. The main criterion of drug efficacy was the incidence of spontaneous bleeding occurred within 48 hours after of the moroctocog alfa injection. The additional criteria were: · The severity of spontaneous bleeding occurred in 21 ± 1 week. · Number of injections needed for the one episode of bleeding according of its severity. · The total amount of drug administered over a period of prophylactic treatment and treatment "on demand". · The number of patients with severe hemophilia A with a residual activity of FVIII ≥1% in 48 hours after the injection on prophylactic therapy. During the follow up period (21±1 week) 17 bleeding episodes were registered, 2 of them (11,8%) were severe, 10 (58,8%) were moderate and 5 (29,4%) were mild (Tab.1). Number of bleeding episodes (spontaneous and traumatic) was 17 (1.55 in average). Number of spontaneous bleeding was 3 (17,6%), 1 of them was mild and 2 were moderate. The average number of injections that stop one bleeding episode was 1.7±0.8. The total amount of moroctocog alfa administered over a period was 1.502.000 ÌÅ for prophylactic treatment and 64.750 ÌÅ for "on demand" treatment. The number of patients with severe hemophilia A with a residual activity of FVIII ≥1% in 48 hours after injection on prophylactic therapy was 63,6% on visit 2, 90,09% on visit 3 and 81,1% on visit 4. The safety assessment was performed in 12 patients. There were 8 adverse events and 7 of them were not associated with drugs administration. There was one serious adverse effect, allergic reaction accompanied by arthralgia and cephalalgia. The patient was excluded from the trial without consequences for life and health. There were no infection transmissions and de novo inhibitor incident. The study showed that moroctocog alfa is effective and safe in prophylactic treatment and stopping of bleeding in adolescents with severe hemophilia A. Table 1. Efficacy evaluation Table 1. Efficacy evaluation Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (05) ◽  
pp. 1352-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emel Aygören-Pürsün ◽  
Inge Scharrer ◽  

SummaryIn this open multicenter study the safety and efficacy of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) was assessed in 39 previously treated patients with hemophilia A (factor VIII basal activity ≤15%).Recombinant FVIII was administered for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes and for surgical procedures. A total of 3679 infusions of rFVIII were given. Efficacy of rFVIII as assessed by subjective evaluation of response to infusion and mean annual consumption of rFVIII was comparable to that of plasma derived FVIII concentrates. The incremental recovery of FVIII (2.4 ± 0,83%/IU/kg, 2.12 ± 0.61%/IU/kg, resp.) was within the expected range. No clinical significant FVIII inhibitor was detected in this trial. Five of 16 susceptible patients showed a seroconversion for parvovirus B19. However, the results are ambiguous in two cases and might be explained otherwise in one further case. Thus, in two patients a reliable seroconversion for parvovirus B19 was observed.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 20-21
Author(s):  
Gili Kenet ◽  
Thomas Moulton ◽  
Erika Soltes Rak ◽  
Brian M. Wicklund ◽  
Sanjay P Ahuja

Background BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry®) is a full-length, unmodified, recombinant factor VIII (FVIII), indicated for on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes, perioperative management of bleeding and routine prophylaxis to reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in adults and children with hemophilia A. It has the same amino acid sequence as sucrose formulated FVIII (FVIII-FS; Kogenate® FS/Helixate® FS). Pharmacokinetic comparisons confirmed BAY 81-8973 to have a longer half-life and lower clearance than FVIII-FS. The objective of this analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety outcomes of patients with hemophilia A who were receiving FVIII-FS prior to enrolling into the LEOPOLD clinical studies receiving BAY 81-8973. Methods LEOPOLD I (NCT01029340) Part B and LEOPOLD Kids (NCT01311648) were Phase 3, multinational, open-label studies that included male patients with severe hemophilia A receiving on-demand or prophylactic therapy, with ≥50 exposure days to any FVIII product and no history of FVIII inhibitors. Patients in LEOPOLD I were >12 years old and received 20-50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 prophylaxis twice-weekly (2×W) or three times a week (3×W) for up to one year. Patients in LEOPOLD Kids were ≤12 years old and received 25-50 IU/kg BAY 81-8973 ≥2×W for six months. Dosing regimens for both studies were assigned by the investigator. In this analysis, efficacy and safety are assessed in the subset of patients in LEOPOLD I Part B and LEOPOLD Kids who were previously treated with FVIII-FS. Results In LEOPOLD I, 22 (35.5%) patients were previously treated with FVIII-FS with a median age of 27.0; in LEOPOLD Kids, 24 (47.1%) patients were previously treated with FVIII-FS with a median age of 5.0 (Table 1). In general, these switch cohorts had similar patient demographics to the whole study cohort (Table 1) and any differences did not affect the final analysis. Most patients did not change their dosing frequency when starting treatment with BAY 81-8973 but most increased their dose (FVIII-FS dose is 25 IU/kg 3×W [adults] or every other day [EOD; children]; BAY 81-8973 dose is 25-40 IU/kg 2×W or 3×W [>12 years] or 25-50 IU/kg 2×W, 3×W or EOD [≤12 years]). Switching from FVIII-FS to BAY 81-8973 resulted in lower median annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in the LEOPOLD studies. In LEOPOLD I, median (Q1; Q3) total ABR decreased from 2.5 (0.0; 9.0) in the 12 months of FVIII-FS treatment prior to study entry, to 1.0 (0.0; 6.8) (Figure 1). In LEOPOLD Kids, median total ABR decreased from 3.0 (1.0; 12.0) to 2.0 (0.0; 6.0) for 0-<6 year old patients (n = 13) and from 4.0 (0.0; 10) to 0.0 (0.0; 2.1) for 6-12 year old patients (n = 11) after switching from FVIII-FS to BAY 81-8973 (Figure 1). Joint and spontaneous median ABRs were zero for <12 year old patients treated with BAY 81-8973. There were no study-drug-related adverse events (AEs) or serious AEs (SAEs) reported in patients switching from FVIII-FS to BAY 81-8973 in either LEOPOLD I Part B or LEOPOLD Kids (Table 2). One patient in the LEOPOLD Kids main study discontinued BAY 81-8973 due to a central venous catheter-related infection after six months of treatment, which was not considered study-drug-related. No FVIII inhibitors developed in any patients in either study. Conclusions Switching from FVIII-FS to BAY 81-8973 resulted in improved bleeding control in adults and children with hemophilia A and was well-tolerated. Disclosures Kenet: PI Healthcare, CSL Behring: Honoraria; Bayer, Pfizer, Takeda, BioMarin, Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Bayer, Pfizer, Roche, Alnylam (Sanofi), Shire: Research Funding; Bayer, Pfizer, BioMarin, Takeda, Roche, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moulton:Bayer: Current Employment. Soltes Rak:Bayer: Other: Employee of Belcan, contracted with Bayer. Wicklund:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire (Takeda): Consultancy, Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria. Ahuja:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; XaTek, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 548-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Christine Voigt ◽  
Denise Wolko ◽  
Grace Cole ◽  
Yanyan Li ◽  
...  

Abstract A fusion protein genetically linking recombinant human coagulation FIX with recombinant human albumin (rIX-FP) has been developed with an improved PK profile, thus improving hemophilia B treatment by allowing less frequent dosing. Two Phase 3 studies (CSL654-3001 and CSL654-3002) were completed. CSL654-3001 study evaluated safety and efficacy of rIX-FP for prophylaxis treatment (PT) of every 7-, 10- and 14-day and on-demand (ODT) of bleeding episodes in 63 previously treated patients (PTP), 12-61 years of age with hemophilia B (FIX ≤ 2%). Subjects in the on-demand arm received only ODT for 6 months and then switched to every 7-day PT. Subjects in the prophylaxis arm received every 7-day PT, and eligible subjects switched to every 10- or 14-day PT for approximately 12-18 months. Annualized spontaneous bleeding rates (AsBR) were compared between ODT and PT periods (in on-demand arm), and between 7-day PT and 10- or 14-day PT (in prophylaxis arm). CSL654-3002 study evaluated safety and efficacy of rIX-FP for weekly prophylaxis regimen in 27 previously treated patients younger than 12 years with hemophilia B (FIX ≤ 2%) for approximately 12 months. Annualized spontaneous bleeding rates (AsBR) were calculated. The median annualized spontaneous bleeding rate were all 0.00 for all treatment interval (7-day, 10-day or 14-day) and in both studies age groups (1-11 years and 12-65 years) during the two completed phase 3 studies. Seventy-six subjects from both studies continued their prophylaxis regimen in the on-going extension study. In addition, subjects (including children), switched to longer treatment intervals of 10-day, 3 times per month or 14-day or lowered their weekly prophylaxis dose. Nine subjects switched to 21-day treatment interval with 100 IU/kg rIX-FP. As of 28 July 2015, at least 50 subjects (PTP) had achieved 100 EDs without developing an inhibitor to FIX or antibodies to rIX-FP. The long term safety and efficacy of rIX-FP will be presented. This presentation includes the new information regarding the change to longer than 7-day treatment regimens in the extension study, among those subjects (1-61 years of age) that previously participated in the lead in studies. Conclusion: The Prolong - 9FP clinical programdemonstrated the clinical efficacy of rIX-FP for routine prophylaxis every 7-, 10- and 14-day treatment intervals. Routine prophylaxis once every 21 days may be effective in preventing bleeding episodes in a selected patient population. In addition, rIX-FP demonstrated favorable long-term safety and tolerability. Disclosures Santagostino: Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau; Baxter/Baxalta: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen/Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau. Voigt:CSL Behring: Employment. Wolko:CSL Behring: Employment. Cole:CSL Behring: Employment. Li:CSL Behring: Employment. Jacobs:CSL Behring: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2594-2594
Author(s):  
Frank Michael Horling ◽  
Peter Allacher ◽  
Herwig Koppensteiner ◽  
Werner Engl ◽  
Fritz Scheiflinger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objectives BAX 855 (Antihemophilic Factor [Recombinant] pegylated, rurioctocog alfa pegol) is an extended half-life (EHL) recombinant human coagulation factor VIII (rFVIII) modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG) (Turecek et al., 2012). It was recently approved in the US and Japan for on-demand treatment of bleeding events and for prophylactic treatment for patients with congenital severe hemophilia A. The efficacy and safety of BAX 855 were extensively studied during clinical development of this compound (Konkle et al., 2015). The assessment of BAX855 immunogenicity was of particular interest because the development of neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) is the most serious complication following replacement therapies with FVIII products. FVIII inhibitors develop in about 20-32% of previously untreated patients (Gouw SC et al., 2013) and with a rate of 1.55- 3.8 per 1000 patients per year in previously treated patients (Kempton CL, 2010) with severe hemophilia A. To fully understand the potential of BAX855 to induce antibody responses, both FVIII inhibitors and total FVIII-binding antibodies were assessed. Furthermore, potential antibody development against PEG-FVIII, PEG and CHO proteins was investigated. Methods The clinical protocols (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02585960, NCT02210091, NCT01736475, NCT01913405, NCT01945593, NCT01599819, NCT02615691) and the methods used for antibody analytics (Whelan et al 2013; Lubich et al 2016) were previously described. ELISA technologies were used for the analysis of total binding antibodies, the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay was used for the detection of FVIII inhibitors. Correlation analyses were done to assess any potential correlation between the development of antibodies and potential adverse events. Results None of the 243 subjects (6 PUPs and 237 PTPs) included in the analysis developed FVIII inhibitors (≥ 0.6 BU/mL) A total of 44 subjects tested positive for binding antibodies against FVIII, PEG-FVIII or PEG at single time points. 28 of these 44 subjects showed pre-existing antibodies against FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG prior to first exposure to BAX 855, which disappeared during the study. 13 subjects who tested negative at screening developed transient antibodies against FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG at one or two consecutive study visits after exposure to BAX 855. Antibodies were transient and not detectable at subsequent visits or at completion of the study. Five subjects showed positive results for binding antibodies at study completion or at the time of the data cutoff. No conclusion can be drawn whether these antibodies are of transient or persistent nature. There was no confirmed causal relationship between the appearance of binding antibodies against FVIII, PEG or PEG-FVIII and adverse events, nor was there an impact on hemostatic efficacy in any of the 44subjects. No subject had pre-existing antibodies or developed de novo antibodies to CHO proteins during the study at any time point. Conclusion Our data indicate that BAX855 did not show an increased risk for PTPs to develop FVIII inhibitors. We did not see any FVIII inhibitor development in PUPs, but the small number of overall exposures does not allow general conclusions for PUPs. Importantly, the data suggest that BAX855 did not induce immune responses associated with impaired treatment efficacy or with altered PK parameters. Disclosures Horling: Shire: Employment. Allacher:IMC Krems: Research Funding. Koppensteiner:Shire: Employment. Engl:Shire, formerly Baxalta and Baxter: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheiflinger:Shire: Employment, Research Funding. Abbuehl:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Employment. Reipert:Shire: Employment.


F1000Research ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1049
Author(s):  
Bendix Samarta Witarto ◽  
Visuddho Visuddho ◽  
Andro Pramana Witarto ◽  
Henry Sutanto ◽  
Bayu Satria Wiratama ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with severe hemophilia often present with painful joint and soft tissue bleeding which may restrict them from their daily activities. The current standard of care still relies on a regular prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII), which has a high daily treatment burden. Recently, rurioctocog alfa pegol, a third-generation recombinant FVIII with a modification in its polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, has been developed. Several trials have studied this synthetic drug as bleeding prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of rurioctocog alfa pegol for previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A. Methods: This study was conducted in conformity with the PRISMA guidelines. Data were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, and CINAHL (via EBSCOhost). Study qualities were assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Modified Jadad scales. Results: Four studies involving 517 previously treated severe hemophilia A patients were included in this study. The pooled mean of total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and hemostatic efficacy was 2.59 (95% CI = 2.04–3.14) and 92% (95% CI = 85%–97%), respectively. Only 30 (2.3%) non-serious and one (1.4%) serious adverse events were considered related to rurioctocog alfa pegol treatment. At the end of the studies, no development of FVIII inhibitory antibodies was observed. None of the developed binding antibodies to FVIII, PEG-FVIII, or PEG was correlated to the treatment efficacy and safety. Conclusions: Despite the limited availability of direct comparison studies, our analyses indicate that rurioctocog alfa pegol could serve as a safe and effective alternative for bleeding prophylaxis in previously treated hemophilia A patients. Moreover, it appears to have low immunogenicity, which further increases the safety profile of the drug in such clinical conditions.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2472-2472
Author(s):  
Marijke Van den Berg ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Herve Chambost ◽  
Karin Kurnik ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction.In patients with hemophilia treated with factor VIII products, the development of inhibitory antibodies poses the largest safety risk. Especially during the first 50 exposure days (EDs), up to 37% of patients with severe hemophilia A have been reported to develop an inhibitor. To study neo-immunogenicity of products and new treatment strategies, patients have been distinguished into previously untreated (PUPs) and previously treated patients (PTPs); the latter defined as patients treated for more than 150 EDs. The number of 150 EDs was established in the eighties during a time when most patients received on-demand treatment and testing for inhibitors was not frequently performed. More recent studies on inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe hemophilia A report that 50% of inhibitors develop within 14-15 EDs, however the cut-off number of EDs for a PUP to become a PTP is not well defined. The aim of this study was to define the number of EDs for PUPs to become PTPs based on long-term follow-up of patients with severe hemophilia A Methods.All patients with severe hemophilia A born after January 1, 2000, treated for at least 1 ED and followed prospectively until inhibitor development or the number of EDs at last follow-up, were included. The number of EDs at inhibitor development is the last exposure day before the first positive titer was reported. An inhibitor was defined as positive when at least two positive inhibitor titers were measured. Positivity was defined according to the cut-off level in each individual center's laboratory. Results.Of 1,038 PUPs with severe hemophilia A, 930 (89.6%) were followed until 75 EDs, 429 until 500 EDs and 212 until 1000 EDs. In total, 300 inhibitors developed, of which 298 (99.3%) within the first 75 EDs. Thereafter only two inhibitors developed, both low titer: after 249 and 264 EDs. Conclusion.Almost all inhibitors develop during the first 75 EDs. Patients with severe hemophilia A can be defined as PTP after 75 instead of 150 exposure days. A change of definition of PTP will increase the number of severe hemophilia A patients eligible for new therapies. Disclosures Santagostino: Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Male:SOBI: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liesner:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: Clinical study investigator for NuProtect Study (Octapharma sponsored), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Carcao:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL-Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nolan:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Álvarez-Roman:Shire: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy. Koenigs:Gilead: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Intersero: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Roche/Chugai: Consultancy; EU (IMI, FP7): Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jansen: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document