scholarly journals A Real-World Evidence Systematic Literature Review of Health-Related Quality of Life, Costs and Economic Evaluations in Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4777-4777
Author(s):  
Candice Yong ◽  
Ellen Korol ◽  
Zaeem Khan ◽  
Huamao Mark Lin ◽  
Juliette Thompson ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Current treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) is not curative, but aims to provide patients with improved disease control to extend survival. Newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) can have significant implications on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of a patient and increase the economic burden to both the patient and healthcare system. Strict protocols followed for clinical trials mean results seen in clinical trials may not reflect routine clinical practice. To assess the burden of illness of NDMM, systematic reviews of real-world humanistic and economic data was conducted. Methods Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) of the humanistic and economic burden in NDMM were conducted, covering the published literature from Jan 2007 to June 2016. Data sources reviewed included Medline, Embase, PubMed (for e-publications ahead of print), and select hematology, oncology and health services research conferences. Eligibility criteria were limited to NDMM patients receiving first-line treatment (including induction, stem cell transplant [SCT], consolidation, and maintenance therapy) reported in observational studies or cost effectiveness analysis (CEA). Results Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for the HRQoL SLR and 29 studies for the economic SLR. The study populations were heterogeneous in terms of patient and clinical characteristics (Table 1). A summary of HRQoL measures and baseline values are shown in Table 2. Cancer or myeloma specific tools were used to assess HRQoL in 5 studies; 2 studies utilized a generic HRQoL tool (EQ-5D and SF-36). Symptoms of interest associated with MM and MM treatment - either pain, fatigue, or neuropathy - were assessed in 8 of the included studies. The humanistic burden was pronounced in patients with NDMM. Across studies, HRQoL was poor at diagnosis; the European Organization for Research and treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) global scores ranged from 55 to 64 at diagnosis (scale from 0-100 with higher values indicating better HRQoL), and improved as patients received therapy. Domains related to physical attributes, including symptoms, were more adversely affected than those related to mental domains. Pain and fatigue were consistently highlighted as the most problematic symptoms throughout the treatment period; however, both symptoms improved over the course of therapy. Neuropathy was measured in 3 studies, each in selected populations; patients who were ineligible for SCT reported greater burden due to neuropathy, and neuropathy increased over the course of first-line treatment. Financial difficulties also contributed to impairment on HRQoL for patients throughout the measured period. Of the 29 studies identified as eligible for the economic review, 22 included either direct or indirect costs, and 7 studies were CEA; 11 studies included estimates of real-world resource use. Costs varied across studies, mainly due to different cost inputs considered and currencies reported. Overall, direct costs ranged from 7,534 USD 2014 per patient per month (unadjusted medical and pharmacy costs for 1st line lenalidomide treatment) to 213,166 USD 2014 per patient (direct costs associated with autologous SCT and one year follow-up). The primary cost drivers of direct medical costs were largely medical care, including hospitalizations and ambulatory care. Two studies reported out-of-pocket expenses, ranging from 3,478 USD 2013 (annual cost to patient in 1st year after diagnoses) to 4,666 USD (year not reported; per treatment episode for 1st year after treatment initiation). The results from the CEA studies differed significantly (Table 3). Conclusions MM specific HRQoL measures indicate reduced HRQoL at diagnosis which gradually improves throughout the treatment period in newly diagnosed patients (before they experience relapse). Pain, fatigue and financial difficulties were domains reported as problematic to patients. Resource use burden studies primarily reported in- and out-patient visits. Indirect costs were reported to be as high as 4,666 USD, which further supports the financial difficulties reported in the HRQoL studies. The burden of NDMM for a patient is physical, emotional, and financial. Real-world evidence on HRQoL and economic outcomes reported from the patient perspective is complementary to evidence from clinical trials and provides an insight into the burden of NDMM. Disclosures Yong: Takeda: Employment. Korol:ICON plc: Employment. Khan:ICON plc: Employment. Lin:Takeda: Employment. Thompson:Takeda: Consultancy. Valovicova:Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd: Consultancy. Luptakova:Takeda Oncology: Employment. Seal:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment, Equity Ownership.

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-499
Author(s):  
Sati Mazumdar ◽  
Mary Amanda Dew ◽  
Patricia R. Houck ◽  
Charles F. Reynolds

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Straube ◽  
Philipp Stude ◽  
Charly Gaul ◽  
Katrin Schuh ◽  
Mirja Koch

Abstract Background Erenumab, the first-in-class fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, was shown to be efficacious and safe for the prophylactic treatment of migraine in adults in randomized clinical trials. Large-scale, real-world evidence in multi-centre settings is still needed to confirm these results. Erenumab patient profiles outside clinical trials and physicians’ treatment patterns, as well as data from patients treated in Germany, a severely impacted population, are not published yet. Methods TELESCOPE was a multi-centre survey gathering real-world data from 45 German headache centres between July 2019 and December 2019. The project consisted of two parts. In the first part, treating physicians shared their experiences on current erenumab treatment with regard to patient profiles, treatment patterns and treatment responses. In the second part, a retrospective chart review was conducted of 542 migraine patients treated with erenumab for at least three months. Treatment responses focused on various aspects of patients’ quality of life. Results The analysis of 542 patients’ charts revealed that three-month treatment with erenumab significantly reduced monthly headaches, migraine and acute medication days. Furthermore, headache intensity and frequency were reduced in over 75 % and accompanying aura in 35 % of patients. The clinical global impression scale revealed a general improvement in 91 % of patients. According to the treating physicians’ professional judgement, 83 % of patients responded to erenumab and 80 % were satisfied with the treatment. Physicians evaluated restricted quality of life, the number of monthly migraine days and previous, prophylactic treatments as the main components of the current patient profile for monoclonal antibody recipients. Based on the assessment of physicians, erenumab reduced migraine symptoms in 65 % and increased quality of life in more than 75 % of their patients. Conclusions TELESCOPE confirms positive treatment responses with erenumab shown in clinical trials in a real-world multi-centre setting. The results show consistently positive experiences of physicians utilizing erenumab in clinical practice and underline that therapy with this monoclonal antibody is effective in migraine patients, particular in those, who have failed several prophylactic therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document