Use of Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Malignancy- a Single Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5907-5907
Author(s):  
Sravanthi Ravulapati ◽  
Cerena K Leung ◽  
Mudresh R Mehta ◽  
Kara M Christopher ◽  
Susan K. Woelich ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially lethal condition commonly suspected in patients with malignancy. Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) is increasingly used in the diagnosis of PE, and guidelines have incorporated various screening tools including the Modified Geneva and Wells criteria to facilitate exclusion of pulmonary embolism. There is an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with active malignancy and therefore an increased suspicion in patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with concerning symptoms. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis at a single tertiary care institution. All patients initially diagnosed with an active malignancy since 2005 and underwent a CTPA between January 2010 and October 2015 were reviewed. Patients were excluded if the CTPA was performed in the setting of trauma, a history of benign malignancy, or if the diagnosis of malignancy was made subsequent to the CTPA. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical presentation, type of malignancy and treatment regimen received. The modified Geneva and Wells criteria were applied to all patients independent from the initial ED risk assessment for a PE. Results: There were 796 patient records reviewed, of which 162 patients met inclusion criteria. Out of these 162 patients, only 8 (4.9%) were found to have a pulmonary embolism. All patients with a positive CTPA had an intermediate risk per the Geneva criteria while only 62.5% had an intermediate risk per the Wells criteria. Of the 154 patients with a negative CTPA, 71.5% and 78.7% had an intermediate risk; 22.5% and 18.7% were classified as low risk based on Wells and Geneva criteria, respectively. The median age of patients was 59 years old, and the majority were male (58%). The most common malignancies in which a CTPA was ordered were lung cancer (27.7%) followed by breast cancer (14.9%) and prostate cancer (6.8%). Despite a negative CTPA, 82 out of 154 patients (53%) were admitted to the hospital. Conclusion: Pulmonary embolism is commonly associated with and frequently suspected in patients with active malignancy. The incidence of PE over a 5-year period in oncology patients was 5% in our emergency department. In total, 18.7% to 22.5% of patients could have avoided a CTPA if scoring was based on the Wells or Geneva criteria. Based on the review at our institution, the modified Geneva and Wells criteria are not adequate, and a new tool needs to be developed for risk stratification for the diagnosis of PE specifically in patients with active malignancy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 714-714
Author(s):  
Miriam Kimpton ◽  
Elena Pena Fernandez ◽  
Carole Dennie ◽  
Rebecca Peterson ◽  
Marc Carrier

Abstract Abstract 714 Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has become the standard diagnostic modality for the detection of pulmonary embolism (PE). More recently, the advent of multidetector CT has allowed better visualization of segmental and sub-segmental pulmonary arteries. Hence, the proportion of patients with suspected PE, in whom an isolated sub-segmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) is reported, has increased. The clinical importance of isolated SSPE diagnosis is unclear. The increased incidence of SSPE diagnosed by CTPA seems to be associated with a lower severity of illness and lower mortality in the CTPA era. Nonetheless, a large majority of patients with SSPE are treated with oral anticoagulant therapy. Current guidelines recommend to anticoagulate patients with unprovoked thrombosis for a minimum of three months and to consider long-term treatment in the absence of contra-indications. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of SSPE is important before exposing patients to potentially indefinite anticoagulant therapy and its associated complications. We sought to determine the rate of agreement between radiologists for the diagnosis of isolated SSPE in patients presenting with suspected PE, and report the three-month outcome of patients who had been diagnosed with an isolated SSPE. A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with suspected acute PE who underwent CTPA between January 2007 and December 2008 was conducted. The CTPA images of all patients with a diagnosis of isolated SSPE were reviewed by a blinded thoracic radiologist. We reported the rate of agreement, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), of isolated SSPE diagnosis between radiologists. Other outcomes captured during follow-up included: recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding episodes and overall mortality. All included patients were followed for three months. A total of 70 patients with a diagnosis of isolated SSPE (single or multiple) on were included. The median age was 64 (range 15–92) and 55% (39/70) were female. Twenty-six percent had a prior history of VTE. Forty-five percent of patients had cancer. The blinded thoracic radiologist agreed with 44% (31/70; 95% CI: 32% to 56%) of the initial isolated SSPE diagnoses. A total of 12% of the included CTPA images were interpreted by the thoracic radiologist to be without evidence of PE. Out of the 70 patients, 18 (26%) did not receive any anticoagulation, and none of them suffered recurrent VTE (PE or DVT) during the three-month follow-up period. One patient in the group of 55 patients who received anticoagulation (2%) suffered a major bleeding. A total of 33% (24/73) of patients died during the follow-up period, most of them from cancer progression. There was no fatal PE. The rate of agreement for the diagnosis of isolated SSPE on CTPA is moderate among radiologists. The risk-benefit ratio of anticoagulant therapy remains unclear in patients with SSPE, especially in the context of a modest agreement on the diagnosis. More prospective management studies and clinical trials are required to assess this very important clinical problem. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Salehi ◽  
Prashant Phalpher ◽  
Hubert Yu ◽  
Jeffrey Jaskolka ◽  
Marc Ossip ◽  
...  

Abstract Background A variety of evidence-based algorithms and decision rules using D-Dimer testing have been proposed as instruments to allow physicians to safely rule out a pulmonary embolism (PE) in low-risk patients. Objective To describe the prevalence of D-Dimer utilization among emergency department (ED) physicians and its impact on positive yields and utilization rates of Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA). Methods Data was collected on all CTPA studies ordered by ED physicians at three sites during a 2-year period. Using a chi-square test, we compared the diagnostic yield for those patients who had a D-Dimer prior to their CTPA and those who did not. Secondary analysis was done to examine the impact of D-Dimer testing prior to CTPA on individual physician diagnostic yield or utilization rate. Results A total of 2811 CTPAs were included in the analysis. Of these, 964 CTPAs (34.3%) were ordered without a D-Dimer, and 343 (18.7%) underwent a CTPA despite a negative D-Dimer. Those CTPAs preceded by a D-Dimer showed no significant difference in positive yields when compared to those ordered without a D-Dimer (9.9% versus 11.3%, p = 0.26). At the individual physician level, no statistically significant relationship was found between D-Dimer utilization and CTPA utilization rate or diagnostic yield. Conclusion This study provides evidence of suboptimal adherence to guidelines in terms of D-Dimer screening prior to CTPA, and forgoing CTPAs in patients with negative D-Dimers. However, the lack of a positive impact of D-Dimer testing on either CTPA diagnostic yield or utilization rate is indicative of issues relating to the high false-positive rates associated with D-Dimer screening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document