scholarly journals Comparison of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) to Bone Marrow (BM) for T-Replete HLA-Haploidentical Donor Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 683-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asad Bashey ◽  
MeiJie Zhang ◽  
Shannon R. McCurdy ◽  
Stefan O. Ciurea ◽  
Andrew St. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mortality Risks ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract T cell-replete haploidentical donor transplants (HAPLO-HCT) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide for control of alloreactivity is now being increasingly utilized. HAPLO-HCTs were originally performed using BM grafts. However, recently, a few single center studies have reported good outcomes using G-CSF mobilized PBSC grafts for HAPLO-HCT. No prospective randomized comparisons of BM to PBSC grafts for HAPLO-HCT have been performed. Therefore, we analyzed outcomes for 687 adults (496 BM, 191 PBSC) who received HAPLO-HCT for hematologic malignancies using post-transplant cyclophosphamide + mycophenolate + calcineurin inhibitor for GVHD prophylaxis between 2009 and 2014 in the United States. The primary outcome was overall survival. The characteristics of recipients of BM and PBSC were similar except BM recipients were older, more likely to have a performance score ≥90, HCT-CI index ≤2, be CMV seronegative, have a lymphoid malignancy and receive reduced-intensity conditioning. Most PBSC transplants occurred between 2012 and 2014. The median follow-up was 35 and 20 months for recipients of BM and PBSC grafts, respectively. Cox regression models were built to study the effect of graft type adjusted for other significant factors on overall mortality, non-relapse mortality, relapse and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and outcomes censored at 2-years to accommodate differential follow-up between treatment groups (Table 1). After adjusting for age, CMV serostatus, disease risk index (disease type/disease status for myeloid and lymphoid malignancy and cytogenetic risk for acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome) and transplant conditioning regimen there were no significant differences in risks for overall mortality (HR 1.00, p= 0.98; 2-year overall survival: 54% and 57%) or non-relapse mortality (HR 0.92, p=0.74; 2-year non-relapse mortality: 17% and 16%) after transplantation of BM compared to PBSC, respectively. However, relapse risks were higher after transplantation of BM compared to PBSC (HR 1.49, p=0.009; 2-year relapse: 45% and 28%). Subset analyses explored the effect of graft type separately for myeloablative and reduced intensity conditioning regimen adjusting for age, CMV serostatus and disease risk index. Consistent with the main analysis there were no differences in overall or non-relapse mortality risks and relapse risks were higher with BM compared to PBSC with myeloablative regimens (Table 1). Although this may in part be explained by lower chronic GVHD risks with transplantation of BM grafts, chronic GVHD was not significantly predictive of relapse risk when modeled as a time-dependent covariate (HR= 0.73, p=0.49). Grade II-IV acute GVHD risks (HR 0.45, p<0.001; 22% and 37%), adjusted for conditioning regimen were lower after transplantation of BM compared to PBSC. Chronic GVHD risks adjusted for age and performance score were also lower after transplantation of BM compared to PBSC (HR 0.35, p<0.001; 20% and 41%) but rates of moderate and severe chronic GVHD were not significantly different (28% and 32%). There were no differences in incidence of hematopoietic recovery by graft type. In conclusion, compared to BM grafts HAPLO-HCT with PBSC are associated with similar overall survival and non-relapse mortality risks but lower relapse risks with myeloablative conditioning regimens. Longer follow up is needed to ascertain whether survival differences may occur later. The observed adverse effect of BM grafts on relapse with myeloablative regimens must be studied further in the setting of carefully controlled trials. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Ciurea: Cyto-Sen Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board. Hamadani:Takeda: Research Funding. Soiffer:Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wingard:Ansun: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

Effectiveness of Reduced Toxicity Conditioning Regimen with Intravenous Busulfan Plus Pentostatin (BUPENT) in Patients Older Than 50 Years with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3331-3331
Author(s):  
Tulio E. Rodriguez ◽  
Mala Parthasarathy ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Zachary M. Earley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Graft Failure ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Reduced Toxicity

Abstract Abstract 3331 Poster Board III-219 Introduction Current data suggests that recipient age above 50 is associated with an inferior outcome after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Overall survival (OS) of 31%, and transplant related mortality (TRM) of 17% at 100 days have been reported in this population (Ditchkowski, et al 2005; Yanada, et al. 2004). Encouraging results are observed with non-myeloablative conditioning regimens. However, for patients with a high relapse risk, this approach may not be sufficient to achieve long term disease control. In these cases, a reduced toxicity, yet ablative stem cell transplantation (RT-SCT) may give adequate time to the transplanted cells to mature and mount an immune-mediated antitumor response. This study evaluated the outcome after RT-SCT using a conditioning regimen consisting of intravenous busulfan (Bu) and pentostatin (Pent). Methods Consented adult patients up to 70 years with a fully-matched related (MRD) or unrelated donor (MUD) were screened for enrollment. Conditioning consisted of Bu 1.6 mg/kg every 12 hours days -7 to -4, and Pent 4 mg/m2 on day -3 and -2 prior to stem cell infusion on day 0. GVHD prophylaxis was methotrexate 10 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5 mg/m2 on days 3, and 6. Tacrolimus was started on day -2, and then tapered over 1 month after day +100. Characteristics Twenty six patients were analyzed. Male to female ratio was 1:1. Stem cell source was from MRD in 15 patients and MUD in 11. Median age was 62, with 92% of patients being older than 50 years. Indications for treatment were AML (35%), MDS (42%), Refractory CLL (23%), Relapsed NHL (12%), and Philadelphia (+) ALL (4%). All AML patients were high risk either due to poor cytogenetic, transformation, or relapse and only two of them were transplanted in first complete remission. MDS patients were RAEB (36%), secondary MDS (36%), or multilineage dysplasia (18%). Two patients had prior autologous transplants. Results No graft failure was observed. All patients achieved neutrophil (NEU) engraftment. Two patients expired prior to platelet (PLT) engraftment. Median engraftment days for NEU and PLT were 13 days. At a median follow up of 25 months, the OS and progression free survival for the entire group was 40% and 38% respectively. The OS in the MRD group was 58%. TRM at 100 days was seen in one patient (4%) due to veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Limited chronic GVHD was the most common observed toxicity (54%), followed by diarrhea (30%) and mucositis (23%). Mucositis was mainly grade 1 (8%) and grade 2 (8%). No grade 3 mucositis was observed. There was only one case of VOD and one case of acute GVHD. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first report of a RT-SCT using BuPent. This study demonstrates the efficacy of the regimen in patients older than 50 years. No graft failure was observed and the regimen related toxicity was acceptable in this high-risk population. The overall survival of 40% at a median follow up of 25 months compares favorably with prior reports of myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplatation in patients older than 50 years. This regimen provides an exciting opportunity to extend the benefits of allogenic transplant to an older population, and warrants replication with larger controlled trials. Disclosures Rodriguez: Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Vesole:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Centocor Ortho Biotech: Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Utilizing Organ-Sparing Marrow Irradiation to Condition Patients Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant with High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies: Results of a Pilot Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2856-2856
Author(s):  
Sumithira Vasu ◽  
Meghan Kromer ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
Hannah Choe ◽  
Karilyn Larkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
Grade Ii

Abstract Background: Total body irradiation (TBI) has long been incorporated as part of the conditioning regimen prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). While the myeloablative TBI conditioning is associated with a lower relapse rate in high risk diseases such as Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), it is also associated with substantial toxicities, and increased NRM so use of this regimen is limited to young patients with excellent performance status. In this study, we used a linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique to deliver standard myeloablative radiation to high risk body sites while sparing radiation sensitive organs (Organ Sparing Marrow Targeted Irradiation, OSMI). We hypothesized that this technique would be feasible and safe in patients who are older or who have higher transplant specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI), typically ineligible for standard TBI conditioning. Methods: This is a single-arm prospective study. Patients from age 18-75 with high risk AML, MDS or ALL were eligible. There are 3 cohorts: (1) age 18-50 with HCT-CI of 3/4; (2) age 51-65 with HCT-CI of ≤ 3; and (3) age 66-75 with HCT-CI of ≤ 2. Patients receive OSMI to a total dose of 1200 cGy delivered twice daily for 6 fractions for a total of 7200 cGy. Clinical tumor volume includes total skeletal bone marrow and any sanctuary or high-risk areas. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis originally was tacrolimus and methotrexate. Given high incidence of bacterial infections related to mucositis, prophylaxis was changed to tacrolimus and sirolimus without methotrexate. All patients received Keratinocyte growth factor for prevention of mucositis. The primary objective was to assess feasibility and tolerability of OSMI based HSCT as defined by transplant-related mortality (TRM) at day 30 (D30) as well as rate of grade II/III organ toxicity (defined by Bearman Regimen-Related Toxicities Scale) attributable to conditioning occurring within 30 days. Results: Patient demographics for the 24 patients are shown in Table 1. Median age of recipients was 56.5 years. No graft failures were observed. The most common grade II or III Bearman toxicities include mucositis (grade 2: n=4), and diarrhea (grade 2: n=4). Clinical outcomes are shown in Figure 2. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) at 2 years was 78% and 74% respectively. Among the 5 patients who were not in complete remission at the time of transplant, 2-year OS and RFS rate was 40%. Incidence of Grades II-IV acute GVHD was 79% and Grades III-IV GVHD was 30%. Relapse incidence was 4% at 2 years. Incidence of Thrombotic microangiopathy by day 100 (TMA) as defined by Jodele's criteria was 17%. Incidence of chronic GVHD was 45% and severe chronic GVHD was 16%. One year non-relapse mortality was 22%, likely due to higher incidence of GVHD. Conclusions: Selected patients who are older or with higher HCT-CI, who are typically not candidates for standard TBI conditioning, were able to receive a radiation-based myeloablative conditioning regimen with 2 year overall survival rates of 78%. We observed a high incidence of TMA, possibly related to use of tacrolimus and sirolimus as GVHD prophylaxis, and a high incidence of Grade II-IV acute GVHD. Low incidence of relapse was observed. OSMI-based conditioning was feasible in this cohort with median age of 56 years and was associated with low rates of relapse and favorable 2 year overall survival. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Vasu: Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: travel support; Kiadis, Inc.: Research Funding; Omeros, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy. Brammer: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. de Lima: Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan Conditioning Regimen with Sorafenib in Patients with AML: Results of Phase I Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 556-556
Author(s):  
Uday R. Popat ◽  
Roland Bassett ◽  
Peter F. Thall ◽  
Amin M. Alousi ◽  
Gheath Alatrash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
License Agreement ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Scientific Advisory Board ◽  
Scientific Advisory

Abstract Background: Myeloablative conditioning can be given safely to older patients by administering busulfan over a longer period (fractionated busulfan regimen) than the standard four-day regimen. (Popat, et al Lancet Haematology 2018). This longer conditioning regimen duration allows the addition of oral targeted agents like sorafenib, which may be synergistic with conditioning chemotherapy and thus further improve disease control. Therefore, we added sorafenib to fludarabine and fractionated busulfan regimen (f-bu) in a phase 1 dose-finding trial studying 4 different doses of sorafenib with f-bu (NCT03247088). Here we report the results of this trial. Methods: Between 3/2018 and 6/2021, 24 patients with AML aged 18 to 70 years with adequate organ function and 8/8-HLA matched related or unrelated donors were enrolled prospectively. The dose of sorafenib was varied among the four values 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg administered from day -24 to -5. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or higher regimen-related non-hematologic, non-infectious, non-GVHD toxicity occurring between day -24 and day 3. The Bayesian Model Averaging Continual Reassessment Method (BMA-CRM) with target DLT probability 0.30 was used to choose doses for successive cohorts of 3 patients. The first cohort was treated at the lowest sorafenib dose 200, with all successive cohorts' doses chosen adaptively by the BMA-CRM. The doses and schedules of busulfan and fludarabine were fixed, with f-Bu dose targeting an area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC) of 20,000 ± 12% μmol.min given over 3 weeks. The first two doses of busulfan (80 mg/m2 IV each) were administered on days -20 and -13 on an outpatient basis. The last four Bu doses were calculated to give a total course AUC of 20,000 ± 12% μmol.min and were given as inpatient following each dose of Flu 40 mg/m2 on days -6 through -3. GVHD prophylaxis was post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) 50mg/kg on days 3 and 4 and tacrolimus. Recipients of unrelated donor grafts also received MMF. All patients were eligible to receive post-transplant maintenance sorafenib after engraftment. Results: The median age was 52 years (range, 30-70). Disease status was CR in 16 (66.6%) patients, CRi in 5 (20.8%), and advanced in 3 (12.5%). Adverse risk karyotype was present in 10 (41.7%) patients. MRD was present in 13 (54.2%). 9 (38%) had mutated flt3. The donor was unrelated in 14 (58%), and peripheral blood stem cells were the graft source in 21(87.5%). Due to the absence of DLTs, the BMA-CRM assigned 200mg, 400mg, 600mg, and 800mg of sorafenib, respectively, to the first 4 cohorts, and the next 4 cohorts were given 800mg. Only 2 dose-limiting skin toxicities were seen, one in cohort 3 with 600mg of sorafenib and the second in cohort 6 with 800mg of sorafenib. 800mg was the final recommended phase 2 dose. The median follow-up in 20 surviving patients was 7.6 months and 1-year progression free survival was 89% (95% CI 75-100%). Other outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Conclusion: Sorafenib can be safely added to the fractionated busulfan regimen. Early data on efficacy appear promising, with an 89% PFS at 1 year of follow up. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Popat: Bayer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Hosing: Nkarta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rezvani: Bayer: Other: Scientific Advisory Board ; AvengeBio: Other: Scientific Advisory Board ; Navan Technologies: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; GSK: Other: Scientific Advisory Board ; Virogin: Other: Scientific Advisory Board ; Affimed: Other: License agreement and research agreement; education grant, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Educational grant, Research Funding; Caribou: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; GemoAb: Other: Scientific Advisory Board ; Takeda: Other: License agreement and research agreement, Patents & Royalties. Qazilbash: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Advisory Board; Biolline: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Other: Advisory Board; NexImmune: Research Funding; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Daver: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Hanmi: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; FATE Therapeutics: Research Funding; Sevier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novimmune: Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Data Monitoring Committee member; Dava Oncology (Arog): Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Shattuck Labs: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy; STAR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Newave: Research Funding. Ravandi: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Xencor: Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Prelude: Research Funding; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Shpall: Magenta: Consultancy; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Magenta: Honoraria; Adaptimmune: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Navan: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Affimed: Patents & Royalties; Axio: Consultancy. Mehta: CSLBehring: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide in matched and haploidentical transplant recipients receiving myeloablative timed sequential busulfan conditioning regimen: Results of a phase II study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7007-7007
Author(s):  
Uday R. Popat ◽  
Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽  
Roland Bassett ◽  
Amanda Leigh Olson ◽  
Amin Majid Alousi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Risk Index ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Target Area ◽  
Post Transplant

7007 Background: Myeloablative stem cell transplants have a lower rate of relapse than reduced intensity regimens. Timed sequential busulfan (TSB) with fludarabine (Flu) is a promising myeloablative regimen for patients undergoing matched sibling (MSD) or unrelated (MUD) donor transplantation (HCT) with low non-relapse mortality (NRM) (Popat et al Lancet Haematology 2018), but was not tested in haploidentical (haplo). Also, whether this approach can be used with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in MSD, MUD and haplo HCT is unknown. To address these issues, we conducted a prospective phase II study. Methods: Patients with hematological malignancies with MSD, MUD or haplo donor were eligible. They received fixed doses of Busulfan(BU) 80mg/m2 either on day -13 and -12 (n=45) or on -20 and -13 (n=10). Then, Flu 40mg/m2 was given on day -6 to -2 followed by Bu dosed to achieve target area under the curve (AUC) of 20,000 umol/min for the whole course based on pharmacokinetic studies. Thiotepa 5mg/kg was given on day -7 to haplo group. GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy 50mg/kg on day 3 and 4 and tacrolimus. Haplo and later MUD recipients also received mycophenolate mofetil. Results: 55 patients with a median age of 47 (15-65) years were enrolled. 30 patients had AML or MDS, 9 CML or MPD, 5 lymphoma, 5 myeloma and 6 ALL. About half had haplo 26 (47%); others had MUD 18 (33%) or MSD 11(20%). Disease risk index was high in 18 (32%), intermediate in 32 (58%), and low in 5 (9%) patients. Comorbidity score was ≥3 in 22 (40%) patients. With a median follow up of 17 months (5-28), 1-year OS, PFS, NRM and relapse rates were 71% (60-84%), 63% (51-77%), 20% (9-31%), and 17% (7-27%), respectively [Table]. There were no graft failures. Day 100 grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD rates were 38% (25-51%) and 9% (95% CI 1-17%), respectively; 1-year chronic GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD rates were 10% (2-28%) and 8% (0-15%), respectively. 1-year OS in MSD, MUD and haplo groups were 91% (75-100%), 72% (54-96%), and 62% (45-83%) respectively (P=0.11). Conclusions: Myeloablative TSB with PTCy is feasible in MSD, MUD and haplo HCT. It lowers the incidence of severe acute and chronic GVHD without apparent increase in relapse. Clinical trial information: NCT02861417. [Table: see text]

Reduced Severe aGVHD and Improved Survival Using Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide/Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in AML Patients Receiving Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan Conditioning Regimen

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3296-3296
Author(s):  
Uday Popat ◽  
Rima M. Saliba ◽  
Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽  
Amanda L. Olson ◽  
Julianne Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis

Background: Myeloablative conditioning can be given safely to older patients by simply administering busulfan over a longer period (fractionated busulfan regimen) than the standard four day regimen. (Popat et al Lancet Haematology 2018). Subsequently, we added post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) GVHD prophylaxis to our fractionated regimen with a hypothesis that it will reduce GVHD and improve outcomes. Herein, we report the results of our retrospective analysis comparing outcomes of patients with AML who received fractionated busulfan myeloablative conditioning and PTCy versus standard tacrolimus (Tac) and methotrexate (Mtx) GVHD prophylaxis. Methods: Patients with AML between 18-70 years of age with adequate organ function and 8/8-HLA matched related or unrelated donor, who were treated on 4 consecutive protocols using fractionated busulfan were included in the analysis. All patients received two fixed doses of busulfan 80mg/m2 as outpatient either on days -13 and -12, or on days -20 and-13 followed by busulfan on day -6 to -3 dosed to achieve target area under the curve (AUC) of 20,000 mol/min for the whole course based on pharmacokinetic studies. Fludarabine ± cladribine were given on day -6 to -3. GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy 50mg/kg on days 3 and 4 and Tac ± mycophenolate mofetil in PTCy cohort (n=53), or standard Tac+ Mtx (n=53). Patients in both the cohorts were matched 1:1 by propensity score. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the PTCy and Tac/Mtx cohorts. The median age was 60 (range, 18-70) and 58 (range, 24-70) years, respectively, (P=0.3). Forty-nine percent were in CR, and 30% had comorbidity index >3 in each arm. Similar proportion of patients had ELN adverse risk in both arms (43% vs 40%, respectively P=0.7). The median follow up was 19 months (range, 3-36) in the PTCy and 46 months (range, 14-73) in Tac/Mtx cohort. Overall survival at 2-year was 78% vs 58% (P=0.03), non-relapse mortality was 6% vs 13% (P=0.2), incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD at 1-year was 6% vs 19% (P=0.07) and chronic GVHD at 2-year was 10% vs 29% (P=0.03) [Table 1 and figure 1]. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was prolonged by 3 days (15 vs 12 days; P<0.001) and platelet engraftment by 9 days (22 vs 13 days; P<0.001) in the PTCy cohort. Full donor chimerism at day 30 was noted in 79% vs 28% in the PTCy and Tac/Mtx cohorts respectively, (P<0.001). Conclusion: As compared to Tac/Mtx, PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis not only reduced severe acute GVHD and chronic GVHD, but also improved overall survival in AML patients up to the age of 70 years who received myeloablative fractionated busulfan conditioning. Prospective randomized trial is warranted to validate these findings. Disclosures Popat: Bayer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Bashir:Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Ciurea:Kiadis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: stock holder; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Research Funding. Kebriaei:Kite: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Nieto:Astra-Zeneca: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Affimed: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Oran:Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Genzyme: Other: Speaker; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Autolus: Consultancy; Bioclinical: Consultancy. Molldrem:M. D. Anderson & Astellas Pharma: Other: Royalties. Champlin:Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Long-Term Outcome of Children with Acute Leukemia (AL) Given Alphabeta T and B-Cell Depleted HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (TBdepl-haploHSCT)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 799-799
Author(s):  
Pietro Merli ◽  
Daria Pagliara ◽  
Mattia Algeri ◽  
Federica Galaverna ◽  
Giuseppina Li Pira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Patient’S Outcome

Background: TBdepl-haploHSCT is a suitable option for children with AL in need of an allograft, lacking an HLA-compatible donor. We previously published promising results in a cohort of 80 children with AL, given this type of allograft (Locatelli et al., Blood 2017), demonstrating a low incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and low non-relapse mortality (NRM), translating into a final outcome comparable to that of patients transplanted from an HLA-compatible donor. We present the long-term follow-up analysis of this study (NCT01810120), now including 134 patients, with a minimum observation time of 100 days after the allograft. Patients and methods: Between October 2010 and April 2019, 134 children with AL in morphological complete remission (CR) received TBdepl-haploHSCT from an HLA-partially matched relative (a parent in 97% of cases) at Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù in Rome, Italy. All patients were prepared to the allograft using a fully-myeloablative conditioning regimen including a combination of cytotoxic drugs and/or total body irradiation (TBI). Anti-T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) was used before transplantation (12 mg/kg total dose, from days -5 to day -3) to modulate bi-directional donor/recipient alloreactivity. Rituximab (200 mg/sqm) was administered on day -1 to prevent post-transplantation EBV-induced lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD). No patient received any post-transplant GvHD prophylaxis. Results: Characteristics of patients enrolled in the study are shown in Table 1. Median follow-up of surviving patients is 60 months (range: 3 months - 8.7 years). Only 3 patients did not achieve engraftment (all affected by acute myeloid leukemia and who did not receive TBI during conditioning regimen); median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery was 13 (range 9-22) and 11 (range 8-23) days, respectively. Cumulative incidence of grade II-III acute GvHD was 16.5% (95% CI 9.9-22.6). One patient developed gut GvHD, while for all other patients skin was the sole organ involved; no case of grade IV GvHD was recorded. Eight out of the 123 patients at risk developed chronic GvHD, in all cases of limited severity, the cumulative incidence of this complication being 7.6% (95% CI 2.3-12.6). Six patients died for transplant-related complications (2 because of idiopathic pneumonitis and 1 each of disseminated adenovirus infection, cardiac insufficiency, combined CMV/rhinovirus pneumonia and sepsis from Pseudomonas aeruginosa), the 5-year cumulative incidence of NRM being 4.5% (95% CI, 1.8-9.0). Since 25 patients relapsed at a median time of 173 days (range 59-1012) after HSCT, the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse is 21.1% (95% CI, 14.2-29.1). The 5-year probability of overall and leukemia-free survival (LFS) were 74.6 (95% CI 65.1 -71.9) and 74.4% (95% CI 65.4-81.4) (Figure 1A), respectively. Use of TBI during the preparative regimen, age at transplant above the median value (Figure 1B) and disease status at transplantation (CR1 and CR2, Figure 1C) were associated with better patient's outcome, because of a reduced incidence of relapse (Figure 1D for TBI). All these 3 factors remained statistically significant in multivariable analysis for LFS: hazard ratio (HR) for TBI was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.06- 0.37, p&lt;0.001, HR for age at HSCT was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.11-0.65, p=0.003), while that for disease status was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.26-0.91, p=0.02), respectively. The 5-year GvHD/relapse-free survival was 69.9% (95% CI 60.8-77.3). The median CD3+ cell count on day +30, +90, +180 and +360 were 187, 215, 660 and 1260/mcl, respectively. Conclusions: These data confirm in a larger population and with a longer follow-up that TBdepl-haploHSCT is a safe and effective transplant option, being associated with a low risk of both NRM and acute/chronic GvHD, resulting into a 5-year LFS comparable or even better with that reported in studies using either an HLA-identical sibling or an unrelated volunteer as donor. In particular, the low incidence of chronic GvHD preserves a good quality of life in patients with long life-expectancy. Leukemia recurrence represents the main cause of treatment failure and strategies based either on the use of a titrated number of donor T cells transduced with a safety switch or ex-vivo depleted of the alloreactive component could further improve patient's outcome. Figure 1 Disclosures Merli: Novartis: Honoraria; Sobi: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy. Algeri:Miltenyi: Honoraria; Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria. Locatelli:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Immune Reconstitution and Long-Term Outcomes Following Allo-HCT with TLI-ATG and Post-Transplant Rituximab

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1996-1996
Author(s):  
Vanessa E Kennedy ◽  
Sally Arai ◽  
David B Miklos ◽  
Fang Wu
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Immune Reconstitution ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant

Post-transplant, prophylactic rituximab has been associated with low incidence of chronic graft-versus host disease (cGVHD) by significantly reducing B-cell allogeneic immunity. However, the long-term effects of B-cell depletion on immune reconstitution and the long-term overall survival (OS) and incidence of cGVHD remain unknown. We describe 35 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n = 13) or high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; n = 22) treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with total lymphocyte irradiation/anti-thymocyte globumin (TLI-ATG) conditioning and prophylactic rituximab. The median follow up time was 9.9 years. As a comparison group, we analyzed 43 patients of various histologies transplanted during the same time period who received TLI-ATG conditioning but no prophylactic rituximab. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) at 8 years for CLL were 54.5% and 22.7%, respectively; for MCL patients 8-year OS and PFS were 53.8% and 23.1%, respectively. The 8-year cumulative incidence of cGHVD and freedom from immunosuppression for all patients treated with prophylactic rituximab were 22.8% and 65.7%, respectively, compared to 34.9% and 48.8% for the comparison group. To assess B-cell alloimmunity, we examined formation of antibodies targeting Y-chromosome encoded protein (HY Abs) in male patients receiving grafts from female donors (F à M). At 3 years post-HCT, 20% of F à M patients receiving rituximab had formed HY Abs compared to 78% of F à M patients in the comparison group (p = 0.04). At 10 year follow up, only 33% of F à M patients who received rituximab had formed HY Abs. B-cell alloimmunity was also assessed by development of antibodies to common infectious antigens. At 3 years post-HCT, patients who received rituximab had significantly lower tetanus (3.29 vs 3.74 fold, p = .017) and EBV (3.36 vs 3.76 fold; p = 0.045) titers than patients who did not. At 10-year follow up, tetanus and EBV titers patients who received rituximab had not significantly changed. Importantly, patients who received prophylactic rituximab had significantly lower IgG levels at both 3 years (498 vs 843 mg/dL, p = 0.009) and 5 years (357 vs 724 mg/dL, p = 0.041) post-HCT. For patients receiving prophylactic rituximab, at 10 years post-transplant, the median IgG was 603, and 20% of patients had IgG < 400 mg/dL. More patients receiving rituximab required intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) supplementation than patients not receiving rituximab (62.9% vs 32.6%, p = 0.01). Of the patients who required IVIG, patients receiving rituximab did so for a longer amount of time (median duration of use 3.9 vs 0.6 years, p = 0.002). Despite decreased IgG levels, use of rituximab was not associated with a significant increase in hospitalizations for infectious etiologies or febrile neutropenia. Rituximab treatment after allogeneic transplantation provides significantly decreased incidence of chronic GVHD and reduction in B cell alloimmunity, but associates with prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia without increased infection risk. Figure Disclosures Miklos: Kite-Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AlloGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Precision Bioscience: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Becton Dickinson: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Haploidentical Transplantation Using High Dose Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide for Patients with Aplastic Anemia : The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 486-486
Author(s):  
Pedro H Prata ◽  
Boris Afanasyev ◽  
Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽  
Frans Smiers ◽  
Cora Knol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aplastic Anemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Haploidentical Transplantation ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract The outcome of patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) has greatly improved in recent years but is still poor for patients who failed or relapsed after immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and don't have a matched donor. Recent use of eltrombopag shows blood count improvements in 40% of cases, but most patients refractory to immunosuppressive therapy, are also unresponsive to eltrombopag. In this situation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using alternative donor sources (mismatched unrelated donors, cord blood, and haploidentical family donors) may be curative but are also associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Moreover, ethnic minorities have limited access to an alternative donor, especially in the adult population. Haploidentical transplantation using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (Haplo-PTCy) has been shown to facilitate engraftment and shows GvHD rates comparable to those of matched sibling HSCT in hematologic malignancies. However, few papers have been published on Haplo-PTCy in the context of aplastic anemia. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 36 patients (72% male), who received an haplo-PTCy for aplastic anemia in 22 EBMT centers from June 2010 to March 2017. Haplo-PTCy was the first transplantation for 81% patients (second, 11%; third, 8%). The non-myeloablative preparatory regimen included anti-thymocyte globulin in 33% of patients and low dose TBI in 58% of patients. Donors were father (n=12, 35%), mother (n=12, 35%), brother (n=5, 15%), sister (n=3, 9%), cousin (n=1, 3%) and daughter (n=1, 3%). The stem cell source was mainly bone marrow (55%). All patients received cyclophosphamide 50mg/kg/day IV on days +3, and +4 post-transplant and 75% received tacrolimus or cyclosporine plus mycophenolic acid. The primary endpoint was the probability of OS. Secondary study endpoints included probability of neutrophil recovery (ANC 500/ μL for at least 3 consecutive days), platelet recovery (platelets 20 000/ μL for at least 3 consecutive days, and 7 days after the last transfusion), cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD and relapse-free survival without Grade III-IV acute GvHD and without extensive chronic (GRFS). Thirty-two patients were diagnosed with moderate (7%), severe (52%) or very severe idiopathic aplastic anemia (41%), while 4 patients were transplanted for congenital aplastic anemia (3 Fanconi Anemia and 1 Diamond Blackfan). The median age was 19.4 years (range 2.5-45.4 years; 58% adults). Median disease duration before haplo-PTCy was 11.3 months (1.9-201.2). Thirty patients (83%) received pretreatment (77% anti-thymocyte globulin plus cyclosporine, 12% eltrombopag, and 1 patient (3%) received androgens). Cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil recovery at day 60 was 78% (64-91) with a median time of 21 days (18-26). Cumulative incidence (CI) of platelet recovery at day 60 was 60% (44-76) with a median time of 31 days (22-185). The CI of grade II-IV acute GvHD was 26% (12-41%) (grade II 19% (7-32%), grade III 6% (0-13%) and no grade IV). CI of chronic GvHD was 17% (5-30) at 1 year (6% (0-13%) extensive) and a CI of 22% (7-37) at 2 years (only limited, there was no new case of extensive cGvHD after one year). With a median follow-up of 24.6 months (15.9 - 38.2), the estimated probability of overall survival (OS) was 78% (64-91) at 1 year and 74% (60-89) at 2 years. Of note, among the 4 patients with inherited disorders, 2 died [1 infection (Diamond Blackfan) and 1 aGvHD (Fanconi Anemia)] and 2 are alive at month 12 and month 15 of follow-up, respectively. Nine patients died during the study. The main cause of death was infection (n=6, 67%). Finally, the GRFS (alive, full donor chimerism, without previous grade III-IV GvHD and without extensive cGvHD) was 58% (41-75) at 2 years. In conclusion, with a median follow-up of 2 years, Haplo-PTCy leads to 74% overall survival in 36 patients with aplastic anemia, with almost 60% of the patients being free from GvHD complication. In a population with no other therapeutic options, our data suggests haplo-PTCY is a feasible option. However, prospective well-designed trials are urgently needed before the inclusion of Haplo-PTCy in the treatment strategy of aplastic anemia. Disclosures Bloor: Janssen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Ganser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tilly:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Russell:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Kerre:Celyad: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Peffault De Latour:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Treosulfan Plus Fludarabine (FT14) with Busulfan Plus Fludarabine (FB4) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First or Second Complete Remission: An Analysis from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1787-1787
Author(s):  
Eleni Gavriilaki ◽  
Ioanna Sakellari ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Urpu Salmenniemi ◽  
Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Blood And Marrow Transplantation ◽  
Unrelated Donors

Abstract Background: Treosulfan has been increasingly used in reduced toxicity regimens, especially in older or frail patients. Different doses of treosulfan plus fludarabine have shown an advantage over reduced intensity regimens, confirmed by a randomized phase 3 trial utilizing treosulfan 30 g/m² (or FT10) in the majority of patients. However, data comparing fludarabine with higher doses of treosulfan (FT14) to fludarabine combined with myeloablative doses of busulfan are limited. Aims: We compared outcomes between treatment alternatives of similar conditioning intensity: FT14 (fludarabine 150 or 160 mg/m 2 and treosulfan 42g/m 2, or FT14) over FB4 (fludarabine 150 or 160 mg/m 2 and busulfan 12.8 mg/kg). Methods: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, meeting the following inclusion criteria: a) adults diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), b) recipients of first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from a matched unrelated or sibling donor between 2010-2020, c) HSCT at first or second complete remission (CR), d) conditioning regimen with either FT14 or FB4. Patients with ex vivo manipulated grafts were excluded. A sub-group analysis was performed according to age (&lt;55 years or ≥55 years). Results: In total, 2703 patients were included in the analysis comprising 2025 (75%) transplanted with FB4, and 678 (25%) with FT14. In the sub-group of patients younger than 55 years (n=1676), FT14 recipients (n=236) had a significantly increased age (p&lt;0.001), higher rates of secondary AML (p&lt;0.0001), unrelated donors (p&lt;0.0001), and peripheral blood grafts (p=0.026), but a lower percentage of female donors to male recipients (p=0.008), compared to FB4 recipients (n=1440). Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade III-IV was higher in FT14 (9.3% versus 5.8%, p=0.044), but rates of chronic GVHD were similar. With a median follow-up of 24.4 months (range 23.4-25.6), 2-year CI of relapse was higher in FT14 (35.9% versus 27.5%, p=0.025, Figure 1A), while non-relapse mortality was similar between groups (NRM 11.9% versus 7.7%, p=0.28, 1B). This led to lower 2-year leukemia-free survival (LFS 52.2% versus 62.4%, p=0.002, 1C), overall survival (OS 63.2% versus 72.9%, p=0.038, 1D), and GVHD free, relapse free survival (GRFS 41.3% versus 50%, p=0.004) in FT14. In Cox-regression multivariate analysis, conditioning regimen remained an independent predictor of CI of relapse (p=0.011), and LFS (p=0.03). Similar differences in patient characteristics were observed in patients aged ≥55 years (n=1027). FT14 recipients (n=442) had a significantly increased age (p&lt;0.001), higher rates of secondary AML (p&lt;0.0001), unrelated donors (p&lt;0.0001), adverse cytogenetics (p&lt;0.0001), peripheral blood grafts (p=0.026), but a lower percentage of female to male combinations (p=0.008) compared to FB4 (n=585). Cumulative incidence (CI) of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV was higher in FT14 (7.6% versus 6.5%, p=0.001), with similar rates of chronic GVHD. Nevertheless, with a median follow-up of 29.6 months (range 23.9-34.1), 2-year CI of relapse, NRM, as well as LFS, OS and GFRS were similar between groups. Conclusion: With the limitations of a retrospective analysis, our large real-world multicenter study suggests that FB4 is associated with better outcomes compared to FT14 in younger patients with AML transplanted in first or second CR. The same was not true for older patients (≥55 years). It should also be noted that FT14 has been selected by treating physicians for higher risk HSCT, including patients who are older, have secondary disease, adverse cytogenetics, and unrelated donors. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine the optimal conditioning regimen for such patient populations. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gavriilaki: Alexion, Omeros, Sanofi Corporation: Consultancy; Gilead Corporation: Honoraria; Pfizer Corporation: Research Funding. Labopin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Yakoub-Agha: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Hilgendorf: Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Other: Travel Support; SanofiGenzyme: Other: Travel Support. Kröger: Novartis: Research Funding; Riemser: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Pharma: Honoraria. Mielke: Gilead/KITE: Other: Travel support, Expert panel ; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Immunicum: Other: Data safety monitoring board; Miltenyi: Other: Data safety monitoring board; DNA Prime SA: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Speakers Bureau. Zuckerman: AbbVie: Honoraria; Orgenesis Inc.: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BioSight Ltd: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cellect Biotechnology: Honoraria. Giebel: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Bazarbachi: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Hikma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spyridonidis: Menarini: Current Employment. Mohty: Astellas: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Second Blood or Marrow Transplant (BMT) for Relapse: Mismatch Haplotype Switch May Improve Outcome

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2252-2252
Author(s):  
Philip H Imus ◽  
August R Dietrich ◽  
Amanda Blackford ◽  
Robert A. Brodsky ◽  
Heather J. Symons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Shared Haplotype ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Introduction: With improvements in supportive care, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) control, relapse has become the major complication of allogeneic BMT. The use of haploidentical donors often allows the potential to select a different donor for the second transplant. We examined the outcomes of patients who underwent a second BMT for relapse at Johns Hopkins between 2005 and 2014. We hypothesized that if loss of heterozygosity is a mechanism for relapse after haploBMT, then utilizing a donor that recognizes the other shared haplotype could improve antitumor activity and thus overall survival (OS). In the case of a failed matched transplant, recognition of a non-shared haplotype on the tumor by the second allograft would be beneficial. Methods: We identified all patients who received a second transplant for relapse of a hematologic malignancy between 2005 and 2014. Acute GVHD (aGVHD) is reported as Glucksberg grades 1-4; chronic GVHD (cGVHD) is reported as limited or extensive. GVHD and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was calculated via cumulative incidence (CI) with competing risk analysis. OS was calculated as the time from second transplant to death or last known follow-up and estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. Differences in time to death between patient groups were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Non-relapse mortality was estimated using Fine and GrayÕs method. Results: Between 2005 and 2014, 40 patients received a second BMT for a relapsed hematologic malignancy (Table 1). The median age at second transplant was 43.9 (range 1 to 74); 14 (35%) were female. Fifteen (41%) received myeloablative conditioning for their first transplant, and 35 (92%) received high dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as part of their GVHD prophylaxis. The incidence of grade 2-4 aGVHD after the first transplant was 13%, and limited cGVHD was 13%. There was no extensive cGVHD. Re-induction therapy and second allograft characteristics (Table 2): Refractory or progressive disease at the time of second transplant was present in 20% of patients, and 7/40 (18%) had their second transplant within 1 year. After a first failed HLA-matched transplant, 15 received a haploidentical graft, and 4 received a second HLA-matched graft. Among the 21 who relapsed after a haploBMT, 7 received an HLA-matched allograft, and 14 received a haploidentical graft; 6 out of those 14 used a donor that switched the shared haplotype. Most (81%) received PTCy with the second BMT. Median follow up is 598 days. Median OS in the cohort is 911 days (95% CI 602 Ð NR); 4 year OS is 38%. The CI of NRM by 2 years was 29% - 4 patients died of complications of GVHD (only one of whom received post-transplant Cyclophosphamide), 3 associated with prolonged cytopenias, 1 within a month of BMT, and 3 of pneumonia. Grade 2-4 aGVHD occurred in 11 pts (28%), grade 3-4 in 5 (13%). Extensive cGVHD was seen in 7 (18%). Median OS for the patients who relapsed after initial haploBMT who were then retransplanted with an HLA-haploidentical donor with a different shared haplotype has not been reached, versus a median OS of 501 [317-2950+] days among the 15 who did not receive a graft with an alternate shared haplotype (HR 0.21 [0.03, 1.61]; p=0.06). If the 19 patients who received a matched allograft at first transplant are included, median OS is 552 days in the group transplanted with a second graft with the same shared haplotype(s), and 1308 days (Figure 1) in the group whose allograft contained a different non-shared haplotype (HR 0.39 [0.16, 0.98]; p=0.04). OS was better when the second transplant was performed more than one year after the first (HR 0.30 [0.11, 0.80]; p=0.03). A trend towards improved OS was associated with disease status at time of second transplant (remission or chemo-responsiveness versus progressive or refractory disease; HR 0.41 [0.16, 1.03]; p=0.07). Source of graft (BM versus peripheral), conditioning intensity, era of transplant (2005-2010 versus 2010-2015), same versus different donor, and age group (<25, 25-60, 60+) did not significantly influence OS. Conclusion: Second transplants are feasible in all age groups and provide a reasonable chance of long-term survival. GVHD rates using PTCy are low, and similar to that seen with first BMTs. An allograft sharing a different haplotype in the case of relapse after haploBMT, or a haploidentical donor after failure of a matched graft, may be beneficial. OS by Second Donor Haplotype OS by Second Donor Haplotype Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brodsky: Apellis Pharmaceuticals Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Achillion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document