Health Related Quality of Life and Fatigue Improve on Second Line Treatments in Pediatric Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Abstract Background: The impact of second line therapies on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and fatigue in pediatric patients with ITP is not well studied. Objective: To describe the impact of second line therapies on HRQoL and fatigue in North American pediatric patients with ITP. Methods: A longitudinal observational cohort of 120 children with ITP starting second line treatments was enrolled from 2013-2015 at 21 ICON centers. Enrollment requirements included age 1-17y and starting a second line treatment (not IVIG, corticosteroids or anti-D immunoglobulin) as monotherapy. HRQoL (Kids ITP Tool - KIT) and fatigue (Hockenberry Fatigue Scale - FS) surveys were completed prior to starting treatment (baseline) and 1 and 12 months after starting treatment by patient/caregiver. KIT is scored from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), and the FS scores were re-scaled so that 0 is no fatigue and 100 is highest fatigue. At the same time points as the patient/caregiver surveys, physicians assessed the perceived effect of treatment on patient HRQoL using a 7-point scale. ANOVA was used to compare the baseline means of the treatment groups. This study specifically compared change from baseline to 1 month in the KIT and FS using paired t-tests within each treatment group. The 12 month timepoint was not used in the paired analysis of individual treatments due to attrition between 1 and 12 months. Results: The median age at enrollment was 11.3 y (1.2-17.8), and 16% (19/120) had newly diagnosed ITP, 31% (37/120) had persistent ITP, and 53% (64/120) had chronic ITP. The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range: 1-9). Fifty-eight (48%) patients had received at least one prior second line treatment. Treatments selected for second line treatment included: rituximab (n=43), romiplostim (n=31), eltrombopag (n=20), oral immunosuppressants (n=19), splenectomy (n=4), and dapsone (n=3). The child and parent proxy KIT scores significantly improved on rituximab (p<0.001 for both), oral immunosuppressants (p=0.02, p=0.001), and eltrombopag (p=0.01 for both). Child KIT scores also significantly improved on romiplostim (p=0.003); however, there was no significant change in the parent proxy score (p=0.29). The parent impact KIT scores significantly improved from baseline to 1 month on all treatments (p<0.001), although the scores were not significantly different between treatment types (p=0.67). Child, parent proxy, and parent impact KIT scores significantly increased between 1 month and 12 months in paired analysis combining treatments (p<0.001). As previously described, at enrollment, physicians reported that ITP had impacted the patients' HRQoL severely in 15%, significantly in 45%, moderately in 38%, and almost not at all in 3%. Physicians reported that HRQoL improved in 68% (range: 64-75%) of patients while on treatment from baseline to 1 month with no significant difference by treatment group (p=0.46). The physician's assessment of the patient's baseline HRQoL significantly correlated with the child and parent proxy KIT report (p<0.0001); however, after 1 month of treatment, the physician's assessment no longer correlated with the child (p=0.26) or parent proxy KIT report (p=0.11). At enrollment, the median FS-Child score (n=54) was 18.5 (range 0-85), the median FS-Adolescent score (n=42) was 20.2 (0-73), and the median FS-Parent (n= 100) score was 35 (7-81). One month FS-Child improved for those who were treated with rituximab (p=0.03); there was no significant change in fatigue on the other treatments. One month FS-Parent significantly improved for those treated with rituximab (p=0.015) and eltrombopag (p=0.009). Conclusions: In this pediatric cohort, all second line treatments appear to significantly improve HRQoL in ITP. Rituximab had the greatest impact in decreasing fatigue at one month. Physician assessment of patient HRQoL did not correlate well with patient assessment after treatment was started, suggesting there may be challenges in ascertaining the effect of treatment on HRQoL. Future analysis of ICON1 will consider the impact of treatment on HRQoL and fatigue while also accounting for the treatment effect on bleeding and platelet count. Disclosures Grace: Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Klaassen: Amgen: Consultancy; Hoffman-La Roche LTD: Consultancy; Octapharma: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria; Biogen Canada LTD: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Despotovic: Sanofi: Consultancy; Schell Cooley LLP: Other: Expert witness. Bussel: Protalex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Momenta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rothman: Pfizer: Consultancy; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Haley: Genentech: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria. Neufeld: Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lambert: Educational Concepts in Medicine: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Clinical Characteristics and Quality of Life of Children with ITP Starting Second Line Treatments: Data from the ITP Consortium of North America ICON1 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.249.249 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 249-249

Author(s):

Rachael F Grace ◽

Robert J. Klaassen ◽

Jennifer A Rothman ◽

Kerry Hege ◽

Ellis J Neufeld ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Proxy Report ◽

Parent Proxy Report ◽

Bleeding Score ◽

Parent Proxy

Abstract Background: Children with ITP who are prescribedsecond line treatments vary in terms of their clinical phenotype, prior treatments, and health related quality of life (HRQoL). Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics and HRQoL of North American pediatric patients with ITP initiating second line treatments. Methods: A longitudinal observational cohort of 118 children with ITP starting second line treatments was enrolled from 2013-2015 at 21 ICON centers. Enrollment requirements included age 1-17y and starting a second line treatment (not IVIG, steroids or anti-D) as monotherapy. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, including response to prior treatments, worst bleeding scores, and baseline platelet counts. Fisher's exact test was used to compare treatment with phase of ITP, age cohort, and gender. HRQoL was measured by patient/caregiver report using the Kids ITP Tool (KIT) where 0 is worst and 100 is best, while physicians assessed the perceived effect of ITP on patient HRQoL using a 5-point scale. Spearman correlations were used to test for association between bleeding, HRQoL, and duration of ITP. ANOVA was used to compare the mean KIT scores of the treatment groups. Results: The clinical characteristics of the cohort are shown in the Table. Median age at enrollment was 11.4 y and 15% had newly diagnosed ITP, 31% had persistent ITP, and 54% had chronic ITP. The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range: 1-9). The prior response rate (platelet >30 x 109/µL and no bleeding) to prednisone was 59% and IVIG 66%. Fifty-five (47%) patients had received at least one prior second line treatment. At enrollment, physicians reported that ITP had impacted the patients' HRQoL severely in 15%, significantly in 44%, moderately in 38%, and almost not at all in 3%. The mean score of the child KIT report was 71.4 (SD 17.2), the parent proxy KIT was 64.7 (SD 16.4), and the parent impact KIT was 36.1 (SD 19.2). The physician's assessment of the patient's HRQoL significantly correlated with the child report (p<.001) and parent proxy report (p<.001). The number of prior treatments and the worst bleeding score did not significantly correlate with the child or parent proxy KIT scores with the exception of gynecologic bleeding on the parent proxy report (p=.002). The duration of ITP significantly correlated with child (p=0.001) and parent proxy KIT scores (p=0.005) where a longer duration was associated with better HRQoL. The number of prior treatments, worst bleeding, and phase of ITP did not correlate with the parent impact KIT score. Treatments selected for second line treatment included: rituximab (n=42), romiplostim (n=31), eltrombopag (n=20), oral immunosuppressants (n=16), splenectomy (n=4), and dapsone (n=3). The selected treatment was not significantly different by age, gender, baseline child KIT score, or duration of ITP. Baseline parent proxy KIT scores varied significantly between selected treatments (p=0.03) and were significantly lower in children starting on eltrombopag in comparison to romiplostim (56.4 (SD 15.1) vs. 70.3 (SD 15.1), respectively; p=0.03). Conclusions: Children with ITP starting on new second line treatments often have received multiple prior treatments and nearly half start these treatments prior to being diagnosed with chronic ITP, including 15% who were in the newly diagnosed phase. Physician assessment of patient HRQoL correlates well with child and parent proxy report of HRQoL. The number of prior treatments and worst bleeding score did not correlate with HRQoL. Longer duration of ITP was associated with a better HRQoL, suggesting that the level of concern related to ITP may lessen over time. Baseline KIT scores were significantly different in children starting on specific treatments. Future analysis will compare the change from baseline in HRQoL in children treated with second line therapies. Disclosures Grace: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Scientific Advisor, Research Funding. Neufeld:Novartis: Consultancy. Bussel:Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Symphogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Protalex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Physicians Education Resource: Speakers Bureau; Prophylix Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Genzyme: Research Funding; BiologicTx: Research Funding; Momenta Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sysmex: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Haley:Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Honoraria. Thompson:Baxalta (now part of Shire): Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxalta (now part of Shire): Research Funding; ApoPharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Mast: Research Funding; Mast: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Eli Lily: Research Funding; Eli Lily: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Healthcare Utilization and Health Related Quality of Life in Persons with Von Willebrand Disease

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-143055 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3-4

Author(s):

Jonathan C. Roberts ◽

Roshni Kulkarni ◽

Peter A. Kouides ◽

Robert F. Sidonio ◽

Shannon L Carpenter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Healthcare Utilization ◽

Research Funding ◽

Von Willebrand Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Related Quality ◽

Joint Health ◽

Health Related ◽

The Impact

Background: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Questions remain regarding the impact of VWD related bleeding phenotype on healthcare utilization, joint health, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the US. Objective: Our study investigated the impact of VWD bleeding phenotype on healthcare utilization, joint health, and HRQoL in a geographically diverse cohort of individuals with VWD who obtain care at seven US Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs). Methods: Hematology Utilization Group Studies (HUGS) prospectively examined the cost and burden of illness in persons with VWD. The current study enrolled individuals age ≥12 with VWD Type 1 (VWF:Ag/RCo: ≤30%), low VWF (VWF:Ag/RCo: 30-50%), Type 2, and 3. Participants completed a standardized interview to collect sociodemographic and clinical data, self-reported healthcare utilization and bleeding in last 6 months, self-reported pain, joint health and HRQoL measured by EQ-5D-3L. Clinical chart reviews abstracted information about VWD type and treatment. Association of bleeding and VWD type with healthcare utilization, joint health, and HRQoL were assessed using Chi-square or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and Student T-tests or one-way ANOVA for continuous variables. P value ≥0.05 indicates not statistically significant (NS). Results: We analyzed 100 participants with complete baseline information. Mean age was 31.7 (SD=18.6) years, 67.0% were adults ≥18 years, 80.0% were female, 67.7% had Type 1/low VWF, and 3.0% had Type 3 VWD. Mean age at VWD diagnosis was 13.6 (SD=13.0) years. Persons with low VWF were diagnosed and received VWD treatment at an older age (mean 19.2, SD=11.8; 19.4, SD=11.9 years for diagnosis and treatment respectively) than those with Type 1 (13.7, SD=12.7; 15.6, SD=13.7), or Types 2&3 (9.4, SD=12.9; 13.3, SD=16.6), p=0.03 and p=NS. As compared to individuals without bleeding in the previous 6 months, those reported bleeding had significantly higher rate of medical procedures related to treating bleeding events (42.5% vs. 13.3%, p=0.001), and overnight hospitalization (20.0% vs. 3.3%, p<0.01). The individuals with recent bleeding also reported higher proportion of emergency room visits (25.0% vs. 11.9%, p=NS), physician visits (55.0% vs. 38.3%, p=NS), joint pain (48.7% vs. 40.0%, p=NS), and joint range of motion limitation (35.9% vs. 20.0%, p=NS) than those without bleeding, although the differences were not statistically significant. Those with recent bleeding reported more problems in EQ-5D mobility (33.3% vs. 15.0%, p=0.03) and usual activities (41.0% vs. 26.7%, p=NS) than those without recent bleeding. EQ VAS (71.6 vs. 75.2, p=NS) and EQ index scores (0.79 vs. 0.83, p=NS) were not significantly different between persons with and without recent bleeding. Those with Types 2&3 VWD were more likely to have hospitalization (25.0% vs. 5.0%, 2.1%, p<0.01), bleeding (50.0% vs. 35.0%, 36.2%, p=NS), joint pain (53.1% vs. 30.0%, 41.3%, p=NS), joint range of motion limitation (40.6% vs. 20.0%, 19.6%, p=NS) than those with low VWF or Type 1 VWD. Individuals with low VWF (50.0%) reported higher rate of anxiety or depression per EQ-5D than Type 1 (34.8%) or Type 2&3 (40.6%), p=NS. Covariate-adjusted EQ-5D VAS or index score were lower among persons with low VWF (64.7±8.2 for VAS, 0.76±0.07 for EQ-index) than those with Type 1 (77.3±7.6, 0.84±0.06) or Types 2&3 (78.7±7.4, 0.84±0.66), p values=NS. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that persons with VWD who obtain care at US HTCs experience significant illness burden regardless of severity. Self-reported recent bleeding as expected was associated with increased healthcare utilization and negative impact on joint health and HRQoL. Bleeding phenotype was significantly associated with healthcare utilization differences. Delayed diagnosis and treatment for persons with low VWF may impact their HRQoL, and if confirmed in a larger sample size would underscore the fact that low VWF is not necessarily a mild disorder compared to other VWD subtypes. Disclosures Roberts: Octapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; uniQure: Consultancy. Kulkarni:Bioverativ/Sanofi, BPL, Genentech, Kedrion, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Takeda, Catalyst Bioscience Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi/ Bioverativ, Bayer, Biomarin, Shire/Takeda, Novo Nordisk, Freeline: Other: clinical trial research grants . Sidonio:Octapharma, Grifols, Takeda and Genentech: Research Funding; Bayer, Bioverativ/Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Takeda, Uniqure, Biomarin, Octapharma, Catalyst, Grifols, Sigilon, Tremeau, Genentech/Roche: Consultancy. Carpenter:Kedrion: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria; American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Hemostasis & Thrombosis Research Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; American Academy of Pediatrics: Other: PREP Heme/Onc editorial board. Konkle:Sigilon: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Uniquire: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Baxalta: Research Funding; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wu:Baxalta US Inc., Bannockburn, IL (a Takeda Company), CSL Behring L.L.C., and Octapharma USA, Inc.: Research Funding. Curtis:USC Hemophilia Utilization Group Study (HUGS): Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences: Consultancy. Carrasco:Baxalta US Inc., Bannockburn, IL (a Takeda Company), CSL Behring L.L.C., and Octapharma USA, Inc.: Research Funding. Tran:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Nichol:Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Baxalta US Inc., Bannockburn, IL (a Takeda Company): Research Funding; Genentech Inc.: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Variation in Health-Related Quality of Life by Age Among Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2085.2085 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2085-2085

Author(s):

Chris L. Pashos ◽

Christopher R Flowers ◽

Mark Weiss ◽

Nicole Lamanna ◽

Charles M Farber ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Age Groups ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Age Group ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Related Quality ◽

Health Related ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 2085 Introduction. Although advanced patient age is commonly used as a factor in selecting therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), based on presumed associations with functional status, limited data exist regarding the relationships between age and physical, emotional, social, and functional well being. We examined the relationships between age and these domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for CLL patients treated in US community practices. Methods. Baseline data were collected as part of Connect CLL®, a prospective observational registry initiated in March 2010 involving centers in the US. Data on patient demographics and clinical characteristics were provided by clinicians. HRQOL was self-reported by patients in the clinic at enrollment. Patients completed 3 psychometrically validated instruments: the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), EQ-5D, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu). Standard analyses were conducted of each instrument given clinical characteristics at that time. Reported mean BFI, EQ-5D and FACT-Leu scores were analyzed by age group (<65, 65–74, >74). Statistical significance of score differences among sub-cohorts was ascertained by ANOVA using SAS 9.1. Results. Baseline HRQOL data were reported by 604 patients, enrolled from 161 centers. Patients were predominantly male (62%) and white (90%) with mean age at 69.9 (standard deviation [SD] 11.2) yrs. HRQOL scores by age group are presented: There were no significant differences between the age groups in fatigue as measured by the BFI, or differences in overall HRQOL as measured by the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or the FACT-G. Anxiety/depression and self care are EQ-5D domains that also did not vary by age. Although mobility was most impaired in the oldest age group compared to the two younger groups, usual activities and pain/discomfort were worse in both the younger and older cohorts compared to those 65–74 years of age. FACT-Leu results indicated that the social/family domain scores did not vary by age, but that physical, emotional, and functional domains did vary statistically with the oldest typically doing better than the 65–74 year olds, but not necessarily better than those <65. Conclusions. Initial results from the Connect CLL® Registry indicate that HRQOL does not worsen monotonically with older age. In this cohort, both the youngest and oldest age groups had worse HRQOL in certain domains, presenting an inverted v-shaped relationship. Future analyses should be conducted on: (1) how HRQOL may be affected over time with changes in disease; and, (2) how HRQOL may be influenced by alternative therapies. Results reported here should serve as a useful baseline reference. Disclosures: Pashos: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flowers:Genentech/Roche (unpaid): Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Weiss:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lamanna:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Farber:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kipps:Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbot Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Lerner:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kay:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sharman:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Grinblatt:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flinn:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kozloff:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Swern:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kahn:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Street:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sullivan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Keating:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Management of Steroid-Refractory Graft-Versus-Host Disease - a Survey By the Transplant Complications Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152305 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2884-2884

Author(s):

Zinaida Peric ◽

Helene Schoemans ◽

Christophe Peczynski ◽

Christian Koenecke ◽

Ivan S. Moiseev ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Working Party ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Clinical Practices ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prospective Trials ◽

First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: As there is limited evidence to guide management of patients with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) there is a broad variability of clinical practices. To document the current practice and assess the impact of emerging new drugs in SR-GVHD, Transplant Complications Working Party (TCWP) of the EBMT performed a survey among EBMT centers that covered specific treatment decisions on first- and second-line treatment of acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD). Methods: The survey was conducted from December 2020 to March 2021 among EBMT centers. A questionnaire was developed by the study authors and used for data collection. It consisted of 40 questions focused on general approach in the first-line treatment, preferred second-line treatment in SR-GVHD and ancillary care in aGVHD and cGVHD. Results: 145 centers from 33 countries agreed to participate and responded to the questionnaire. First-line treatment of aGVHD was reported as rather homogenous; with most centers (68%) starting with lower doses of corticosteroids (CS) (<2mg/kg) in lower grade aGVHD (grade 2a) and most centers (88%) starting with higher doses (2mg/kg) in aGVHD grades >2b. On the other hand, the evaluation of response to CS was more heterogeneous: at 3 days in 33%, at 5 days in 30%, at 7 days in 15% of centers and depending on severity of aGVHD in most other centers. In the presence of SR-aGVHD, 50% of centers consider inclusion of patients in clinical trials. Although as much as 85% of centers reported to have a standard operating procedure (SOP) for SR-aGVHD management, only 45% (n=66) have an established one or 2-agent second-line treatment; most frequently ruxolitinib (n=46) and/or extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) (n=29). All other centers reported a very heterogeneous practice and listed multiple agents (range, 3-10) as second-line treatment options. In total, the most used agents for SR-aGVHD as shown in Figure 1A are ruxolitinib in 68%, ECP in 59%, mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) in 27%, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in 25%, high-dose CS (>2mg/kg) in 15%, mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in 14%, etanercept in 13%, infliximab in 11% and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in 10% of centers. Clinical practice in first-line treatment of cGVHD again appeared relatively homogeneous; 58% of centers reported to treat mild forms with topical treatment only, unless affected organs could not be reached topically. In moderate/severe cGVHD, the majority (71%) of centers start with 0.5-1mg/kg of CS, in 45% with addition of CNI, while others use higher doses of CS +/- other agents. The evaluation of response was done before 4 weeks in 41% of centers, between 5-8 weeks in 41%, while a minority performed later response assessment or based the latter on organ affection/severity. In case of SR-cGVHD, 56% of centers would consider the inclusion in clinical trials, while only 65% have a SOP on management of these patients. One third of centers (35%) has an established multidisciplinary cGVHD team. Practices for SR-cGVHD again varied significantly, with most centers reporting on the use of more than 2 agents (range, 3-13) as second-line and with most applied agents as depicted in Figure 1B; ruxolitinib and ECP in 68% of centers, CNI in 40%, MMF in 37%, rituximab in 27%, imatinib in 25%, mTOR inhibitors in 23%, ibrutinib and methotrexate (MTX) in 19%, pulse of CS in 17%, MSC in 12% and PUVA therapy in 10% of centers. Conclusions:In summary, this survey revealed a rather homogenous first-line management of aGVHD and cGVHD based on steroids in the majority of centers. However, when first-line fails, the definition of SR-GVHD remains highly variable and SR-GVHD is still treated with a seemingly "trial and error" approach as demonstrated by significant variability of clinical practices among EBMT centers for second-line treatment. However, in line with recently published prospective trials, ruxolitinib comes forth as one of the most used therapeutic modalities in both SR-aGVHD and cGVHD, together with already widely administered ECP. On the contrary, ibrutinib has not emerged as standard of care in this setting. Future efforts should be invested in finding a standardized approach in SR-GVHD by directly comparing most applied second-line agents in prospective trials as well as evidence-based personalized treatment approaches. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Peric: Therakos, Servier, MSD, Astellas, Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer: Honoraria. Schoemans: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: personal fees , Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants and personal fees; Gilead: Other: travel grants; CIBMTR: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BHS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants and personal fees , Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: personal fees; Takeda: Other: personal fees. Koenecke: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; EUSA Pharm: Consultancy. Basak: Saventic Health: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Greinix: Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Therakos: Consultancy. Penack: Omeros: Consultancy; Shionogi: Consultancy; Priothera: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Therakos: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Neovii: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Health-Related Quality of Life in a Biologic Assignment Trial of Reduced Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Availability in Patients Aged 50-75 with Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147514 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 421-421

Author(s):

Rachel Cusatis ◽

Michael Martens ◽

Ryotaro Nakamura ◽

Corey Cutler ◽

Wael Saber ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Health Related Quality ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

No Donor ◽

Free Survival ◽

Related Quality ◽

Health Related

Abstract Introduction The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network study (BMT CTN 1102, NCT02016781) was a multicenter, biologic assignment trial in older adults aged 50-75 with higher risk de novo MDS (IPSS Intermediate-2 or High) who were candidates for reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT. The trial compared outcomes of those with a suitable HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor (Donor arm) to those where no donor was identified (No Donor arm) within a search window of 90 days. The trial reported a survival benefit for patients in the Donor arm compared to the No Donor arm [Nakamura et al, JCO 2021, in press]. Here, we compare the health-related quality of life (QOL) for patients between the two arms through 36 months after enrollment. We also describe the predictors and trajectories of QOL. Methods English and Spanish-speaking subjects were invited to complete patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), the SF-36 yielding a Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS), and the EQ-5D, at enrollment and every 6 months until 24 months, then 36 months after enrollment. Validation studies indicate a clinically meaningful difference of 5 points for FACT-G, PCS, and MCS and 2 points for associated subscales. To account for the missingness of assessments, including those missing due to death, we compared each score between arms using an inverse probability weighted - independent estimating equation (IPW-IEE) model, which models the scores in surviving patients while using IPW to account for baseline variables and follow-up outcomes that impact the likelihood of missingness. Since 4 scores were evaluated, a Bonferroni corrected significance level of 1.25% = 5% / 4 was used. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the impact of QOL measures on overall and leukemia free survival. The IPW-IEE models adjust for baseline score and follow-up assessment time as well as age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy; the Cox models adjusted for the 6 latter variables and treatment arm. Trajectories of QOL are shown by plotting mean +/- standard error by group over time. Results Between January 2014 and November 2018, 384 subjects (median age 66.7 years, range: 50.1-75.3) were enrolled at 34 centers and biologically assigned to Donor (n=261) or No Donor arm (n=123) by 90 days from enrollment. For the Donor arm the median duration from registration to HCT was 3.9 months (range 0.3-20.7). Completion rates were generally high at 65-78% of eligible survivors at each timepoint. At enrollment, 204 subjects (78.2%) in the Donor arm and 85 subjects (69.1%) in the No Donor arm completed at least one QOL form, with 4 patients unable to complete due to language (non-English or Spanish speaking). While there were some small differences at 18 months favoring the Donor arm, no clinically significant differences in PRO scores or subscales were seen between the arms at any timepoint (Figure 1) or in the scores over time. In general, similar trajectories for the Donor arm were seen for each PRO, with most decreasing or stable from baseline to 6 months and improving thereafter. Compared to published averages of U.S cancer populations, FACT-G means in both arms were higher beginning at 18 months. Baseline and 6-month PRO scores were the strongest predictors of later PRO scores despite adjusting for patient demographic and clinical factors. Overall survival was predicted by baseline FACT-G <70 (HR=1.61, p<.01) and PCS scores <40 (HR=1.82, p<0.001), while leukemia-free survival was predicted by baseline FACT-G <70 (HR=1.61, p<0.01) and PCS <40 (HR=1.80, p<0.002). No associations of PROs with AML transformation, relapse, or acute or chronic GVHD were found. Non-compliance with biologic assignment was less likely in Donor arm compared to No Donor, but baseline QOL was not a confounding factor. Conclusion In older adults with MDS, the survival advantage associated with Donor availability and HCT does not come at the cost of worse QOL in comparison to the No Donor arm. Baseline PRO scores were the strongest independent predictors of subsequent QOL outcomes and survival, even after controlling for clinical and patient-level factors. These results should reassure older patients and clinicians who prefer curative approaches to MDS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cutler: Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Editas: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Cimeio: Consultancy; Deciphera: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Saber: Govt. COI: Other. Lee: Takeda: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other; Incyte: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Shaw: mallinkrodt: Other: payments; Orca bio: Consultancy. Horowitz: Magenta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy; Daiicho Sankyo: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Research Funding; Chimerix: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Medac: Research Funding; Kiadis: Research Funding; Xenikos: Research Funding; Vor Biopharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc: Research Funding; Orca Biosystems: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Mesoblast: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Stemcyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Tscan: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Longitudinal Changes of Impairments in Health-Related Quality of Life in Lower-Risk MDS Patients: A European Leukemianet Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112508 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3097-3097

Author(s):

Reinhard Stauder ◽

Ge Yu ◽

Karin A Koinig ◽

Dominic Culligan ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Self Care ◽

Initial Diagnosis ◽

Health Related Quality ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Related Quality ◽

Health Related ◽

Anxiety Depression

Abstract Introduction Patient perception and perspective have become relevant in individualised therapy planning in MDS. Thus, integration of patient-reported outcomes (PRO), including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), in studies and in clinical practice is essential. We demonstrated recently pronounced impairments in HRQoL in patients with MDS (Stauder et al., Leukemia 2018). However, longitudinal data on aspects of HRQoL in MDS are rare. Objectives 1. To describe longitudinal changes of HRQoL in MDS and 2. To compare the time course in different patient subgroups to define patients at high risk of deterioration of HRQoL. Methods The EUMDS Registry is a prospective, non-interventional longitudinal study, enrolling newly diagnosed patients with IPSS low or intermediate-1 MDS from 143 haematology centres in 17 European countries and Israel. HRQOL was assessed by EQ-5D questionnaire. Patients were selected, if they fully completed the EQ-5D score (five dimensions and VAS) at baseline and at 6 and 12 months, resulting in a total of 743 subjects at 86 centres in 15 countries. Differences in response for the five EQ-5D dimensions between patients subgroups were evaluated using chi-squareMcNemar tests. For EQ-VAS, the mean score with standard deviation was calculated. Wilcoxon's signed ranks tests were conducted to identify changes over time between HRQOL values at baseline and at 6, 12 months. Results Moderate/severe impairments at initial diagnosis were observed in the dimensions mobility (39.4%), self-care (10.2%), usual activities (32.6%), pain discomfort (46.6%) and anxiety/depression (36.7%). As compared with baseline a pronounced increase in moderate/severe problems was observed at 12 months in the dimensions self-care (10.2% (baseline) vs 15.5% (12 mo); p=0.003) and in usual activities (32.6% vs 40.6%; p=0.001). In contrast, self-reported mobility, pain and anxiety/depression did not change significantly. Decrease in VAS over time revealed a trend toward significance (75 vs. 70; p=0.056). More pronounced impairment of HRQOL was most significantly observed in patients of advanced age: 60-75 yrs in self-care 8.3% vs 14.3% (p=0.016) and in usual activities 28% vs 35.7% (p=0.032); in persons 75+ years in self-care 14.2% vs 19.8% (p=0.058) and in usual activities 48.7% vs 50.3% (p=0.003). Similarly, VAS significantly decreased in the latter group from 70 to 66 (p=0.038). Increases in impairments were most prominent in male patients in self-care (9.7 vs 16.7%; p=0.002) and in usual activities (29.4 vs 38.7%; p=0.003), whereas in women HRQoL at the different time points was not significantly different. Pronounced decreases in HRQoL aspects was observed in anemic patients (Hb-levels <10g/dl) at initial diagnosis: mobility 47.4 vs 55.2% (p=0.06), self-care 13.5 vs 21.1% (p=0.015), usual activities 41.3 vs 52.7% (p=0.006), pain/discomfort 43.3 vs 55.6% (p=0.058) and VAS (70 vs 68; p=0.051). A reduction in HRQoL was observed even in patients with a Hb-level ≥10 g/dl in the dimension self-care (7.9 vs 12.1%; p=0.042). Pronounced decreases in problems in HRQoL were observed in anemic patients (Hb<10 g/dL) who received transfusions in self-care (18.1% vs 25.6%; p=0.029), in usual activities (43.6% vs 61.5%; p=0.038), and in VAS (67.3 vs 61.9; p=0.003). Transfusion dependent patients were at high risk to develop impairments in VAS (70 vs 64; p=0.006) and in most dimensions of EQ-5D (mobility 50.2 vs 62%, p=0.017), self-care (8.8 vs 11.5%, p=0.017), usual activities (41.6 vs 62.9%, p=0.01) and pain/discomfort (48.3 vs 58.5%, p=0.038). Conclusions Low-risk MDS patients report relevant restrictions in distinct dimensions at initial diagnosis. A relevant drop in HRQoL is observed at 12 months particularly in self-care and in usual activities. Patients of advanced age, males and those with initial low Hb-levels most frequently reported declines in HRQoL. Transfusion-need represents a relevant predictor of deterioration of HRQoL. These analyses form the basis to identify vulnerable patients and to tailor individualized interventions and treatment approaches. Analyses are planned to unravel the role of intervention therapies on observed changes in HRQoL. Disclosures Stauder: Teva: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fenaux:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Garelius:novartis: Honoraria. Efficace:Incyte: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; TEVA: Consultancy; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Lundbeck: Research Funding; TEVA: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding. de Witte:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Health Related Quality of Life Results from the Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Endeavor Trial Evaluating Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.3309.3309 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 3309-3309 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Heinz Ludwig ◽

Philippe Moreau ◽

Meletios A Dimopoulos ◽

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Martin F Kaiser ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Life Questionnaire ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Related Quality ◽

Health Related

Abstract Introduction: The randomized, phase 3 study ENDEAVOR (NCT01568866; N=929) demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who were treated with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd; median, 18.7 vs 9.4 months; hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.65; P<0.0001) (Dimopoulos et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:27−38). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were included as exploratory endpoints in the ENDEAVOR study. Here, we present results of a prespecified analysis of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in the ENDEAVOR trial. Methods: HR-QoL was assessed by 3 validated instruments: the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30-item questionnaire (QLQ-C30), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-multiple myeloma specific 20-item module (QLQ-MY20), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) "Additional Concerns" neurotoxicity subscale. These instruments were assessed prior to treatment administration on day 1 of cycle 1, and then every 28 days until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or commencement of other nonstudy anticancer treatment. Due to differing treatment cycle lengths, the PRO assessments coincided across groups every 12 weeks. The primary PRO hypothesis was superiority of Kd over Vd for the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale of the QLQ-C30. Seven further subscales were prespecified from the QLQ-C30 (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, physical functioning, role functioning) and the QLQ-MY20 (disease symptoms, side effects of treatment). PRO subscales were compared between groups using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). Two sensitivity analyses were performed for the GHS/QoL scale to evaluate the robustness of the MMRM to missing data. Clinical interpretation for the EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales was guided by pre-specifying minimum important differences (MIDs) based on evidence-based guidelines (5 points for the GHS/QoL scale). For the QLQ-MY20 subscales, the standard error of measurement was used as a proxy for the MID. The proportion of patients who had improved (≥5 points) from baseline on the GHS scale was summarized at each coinciding time point. Results: Baseline completion of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire was similar between groups (Kd, 87.7%; Vd, 84.3%). Compliance was high when calculated for all patients expected to provide a questionnaire at each time point (ie, alive and on-study), ranging from 73.1% to 93.9%. Median duration on study treatment was 40 weeks and 27 weeks for Kd and Vd patients, respectively. Using the MMRM model, Kd was associated with statistically significantly higher GHS/QoL scores compared with Vd (p<0.0001). However, the overall treatment difference point estimate of 3.5 (95% CI, 2.0-5.1) did not reach the pre-defined MID. When including the treatment by time interaction (p=0.28) to estimate the treatment difference at timepoints where HR-QoL assessments coincided with day 1 of a cycle, the point estimates increased over time, with the differences at week 60 and 72 reaching clinical significance (5.4 and 5.8, respectively) (Figure). Results from the two sensitivity analyses confirmed findings from the MMRM analysis. Statistically significant benefits were observed in favor of the Kd group for fatigue (P=0.04), pain (P=0.02), side effects (P<0.0001) and NTx subscales (p=0.0002), although these differences did not meet MID thresholds. The proportion of patients reaching a ≥5 point improvement in the GHS scale was numerically higher in the Kd group up to week 48, although the difference between the groups did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: This analysis of PROs in the ENDEAVOR study demonstrated that Kd was statistically superior to Vd on the QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scale, with clinically meaningful differences observed at later timepoints but not on average overall. For patients remaining on longer term treatment, the clinical benefits of Kd compared with Vd were associated with better GHS/QOL. Although not meeting MID thresholds, statistically significant benefits were also observed in favor of the Kd group for other aspects of HR-QoL. Disclosures Ludwig: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Moreau:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Glicomimetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaiser:BMS: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Consultancy. Feng:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cocks:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Endomag: Consultancy. Buchanan:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weisel:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Symptoms, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Tolerability of Loncastuximab Tesirine in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139571 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3-4

Author(s):

Alexander I. Spira ◽

Lei Chen ◽

Xiaolei Zhou ◽

Ari Gnanasakthy ◽

Luqiang Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Related Quality ◽

Health Related ◽

Night Sweats

Introduction In the ongoing single-arm, open-label phase 2 ADCT-402-201 study (LOTIS 2, NCT03589469), loncastuximab tesirine has shown substantial antitumor activity with a manageable toxicity profile in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who had failed ≥ 2 prior therapies, including activity in patients with high-risk disease characteristics. The overall response rate was 48.3% (based on positron emission tomography-computed tomography [PET-CT] assessed by independent review according to Lugano response criteria), and the median duration of response was 10.25 months. This analysis examined symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and tolerability using validated patient-reported outcome instruments. Methods Enrolled patients aged ≥18 years received loncastuximab tesirine as an intravenous infusion on day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. Responders were defined as patients with a best overall response of complete or partial response. Patient-reported symptoms and HRQoL were measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) and EQ-5D 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) instruments at baseline, day 1 of each cycle while patients were treated, and at the end-of-treatment visit. Descriptive statistics for change from baseline scores and percentages of patients with improved, stable, or worsened symptoms were summarized by visit and clinical response. Analysis was conducted using data collected from study initiation (1 August 2018) through 6 April 2020. Results The 145 patients enrolled in this study had a median age of 66 years (range, 23-94). Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 3 (range, 2-7) prior systemic therapies. A baseline patient-reported outcome score and at least one post-baseline score were available for 130 patients. Completion rates among patients treated at each visit were ≥ 92% for EQ-5D-5L and ≥ 88% for FACT-Lym up to cycle 9, day 1 (24 weeks). After cycle 9, fewer than 20 patients had patient-reported outcome scores available for analysis. For symptoms assessed in the FACT-Lym lymphoma subscale, pain in certain parts of the body, lumps/swelling, trouble sleeping at night, and fatigue were the most frequently reported symptoms at baseline (34%-59% reported "somewhat" to "very much"). Most patients (≥ 80%) reported "not at all" or "a little bit" at baseline for fever, night sweats, losing weight, itching, and loss of appetite. During the course of treatment, higher percentages of patients reported improvement than worsening for pain and lumps/swelling for the majority of visits. Fever, night sweats, and losing weight did not change for most patients. Itching was the only symptom for which more patients experienced worsening than improvement. For other symptoms, similar percentages of patients reported improvement and worsening. The mean change from baseline in EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score showed a trend of improvement in overall health over time (see figure). The mean VAS change reached the minimally important difference of 7 points at cycle 8, day 1. This improvement was associated with clinical response. When patients were asked how much they were bothered by side effects of treatment, most patients (> 60%) reported "not at all" or "a little bit" for all visits throughout the treatment. Conclusions Results of this analysis suggest that patients who responded to treatment with loncastuximab tesirine generally had stable or improved symptoms and overall HRQoL. The treatment was well tolerated by patients. These findings further support the clinical use of loncastuximab tesirine for the treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Disclosures Spira: ADCT:Research Funding;Janssen:Consultancy;Incyte:Consultancy;BMS:Consultancy;Merck:Consultancy;Novartis:Consultancy;Takeda:Consultancy;Cardiff Oncology:Research Funding.Chen:ADCT:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Zhou:ADCT:Research Funding.Gnanasakthy:ADCT:Research Funding.Wang:ADC Therapeutics America, inc:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Ungar:ADC Therapeutics:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Curiel:ADCT:Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.Radford:GlaxoSmithKline:Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Spouse;AstraZeneca:Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Spouse;Takeda:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer:Research Funding;ADCT:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;BMS:Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria;Seattle Genetics:Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.Kahl:AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Celgene Corporation:Consultancy;Genentech:Consultancy;Pharmacyclics LLC:Consultancy;Roche Laboratories Inc:Consultancy;BeiGene:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Janssen:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Acerta:Consultancy, Research Funding;ADC Therapeutics:Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;AbbVie:Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Predictors of Glucocorticoid Responsiveness in Multicentric Castleman's Disease

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136469 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 31-32

Author(s):

Kazutoshi Ebisawa ◽

Arika Nukina Shimura ◽

Akira Honda ◽

Yosuke Masamoto ◽

Fumio Nakahara ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Castleman’S Disease ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Castleman's Disease ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Treatment

Background: Multicentric Castleman's disease (MCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disease accompanying various symptoms and multi-organ dysfunctions. Although anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibodies, tocilizumab and siltuximab are recommended as a therapeutic option, these treatments require patients to visit hospitals at least once a month for many years, and the drug costs are quite high. In Japan, where tocilizumab is the only biological agent covered by the medical insurance, glucocorticoid monotherapy is still an important treatment option. In fact, a part of MCD patients initially treated with glucocorticoids could be successfully controlled without adding or switching to other agents. Considering that emergence of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies which reduced therapeutic efficacy could also be a clinical problem in MCD, there would be a rationale for reserving newer agents for future relapse by using glucocorticoids as first-line treatment for potential responders. Here, we retrospectively analyzed clinical characteristics of MCD patients treated in our institution to explore factors predicting who could be successfully treated with glucocorticoid monotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed histologically confirmed Castleman's disease patients who visited the Department of Hematology and Oncology of the University of Tokyo Hospital from January 2000 to March 2020. Based on the diagnostic criteria of Castleman Disease Collaborative Network (CDCN), MCD was diagnosed when enlarged lymph nodes were present in more than 2 lymph node stations and laboratory and/or clinical diagnostic criteria were met. Unicentric Castleman's disease (UCD) was diagnosed when only one single lymph node region was involved. MCD patients who were initially treated with prednisolone (PSL) were divided into two groups: patients who continued PSL until the latest follow-up (PSL-only group) and patients who received subsequent treatment (Second-line group). Results: 8 patients with UCD and 27 patients with MCD were included in our analysis. With a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 21 MCD patients underwent first-line treatment (PSL, n=18; tocilizumab, n=3). Compared to patients who did not receive any treatment, patients who underwent treatment had marginally higher levels of CRP (7.15 mg/dl vs 4.17 mg/dl, respectively; p=0.066) and significantly lower levels of hemoglobin (9.5 g/dl vs 12.5 g/dl, respectively; p=0.036). Seven out of 18 patients initially treated with PSL had received subsequent treatments (tocilizumab, n=6; rituximab, n=1). Among the PSL-only group, biochemical responses at the latest follow-up could be assessed for 10 in 11 patients: two in complete response, five in partial response, two in stable disease, and one in progressive disease, based on the response criteria of CDCN. Compared to PSL-only group, patients classified into second-line group had higher levels of CRP (11.88 mg/dl vs 6.24 mg/dl, respectively; p=0.024) and lower hemoglobin levels (6.4 g/dl vs9.4 g/dl, respectively; p=0.033). Patients whose CRP levels were lower than 12 mg/dl before starting PSL had significantly longer time to next treatment (TTNT) (median not reached vs 0.88 years; HR, 0.078 [95%CI: 0.013-0.48], p=0.00044). Similarly, patients whose hemoglobin levels were more than 8 g/dl had marginally longer TTNT (median not reached vs 2.63 years; HR, 0.22 [95%CI: 0.040-1.17], p=0.054). In addition, patients with either Hb < 8 g/dl or CRP ≧12 mg/dl had significantly shorter TTNT (median not reached vs 2.12 years; HR, 0.090 [95%CI: 0.010-0.77], p=0.0074). The median PSL dose at the latest follow-up in PSL-only group was 3 mg per day [interquartile range: 0-5 mg per day], which would be comparably safe considering previous reports indicating that PSL dose of less than 5 mg per day was associated with lower incidence of adverse events. Conclusion: Out data suggest that glucocorticoid monotherapy has a good potential to induce sustained disease control for MCD patients with higher Hb or lower CRP levels. Furthermore, PSL doses could be tapered to safer doses among patients who could continue PSL until the latest follow-up. In contrast, the efficacy of glucocorticoids for MCD patients with lower Hb or higher CRP levels were limited. Such patients would be good candidates for novel agents such as tocilizumab or rituximab. Disclosures Honda: Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Speakers Bureau; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.: Speakers Bureau. Nakahara:Eisai Co., Ltd.: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma Inc.: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Honoraria. Kurokawa:Chugai: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanwa-Kagaku: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Otsuka: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teijin: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Nippon Shinyaku: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ Japan: Consultancy; Shire Plc: Speakers Bureau; Jansen Pharmaceutical: Speakers Bureau; Ono: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Characterization of Relapse and Second-Line Therapy in Lenalidomide-Refractory, Transplant-Ineligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Subanalysis of the Phase 3 First Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124557 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3122-3122

Author(s):

Salmon Manier ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Cyrille Hulin ◽

Xavier Leleu ◽

Michel Delforge ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Late Relapse ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Early Relapse ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Ecog Ps

BACKGROUND: Rd continuous is now a standard treatment option in patients (pts) with transplant-ineligible NDMM based on the results of the large phase 3 registrational FIRST trial showing significant PFS and OS benefits of lenalidomide (LEN) + low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous) vs melphalan + prednisone + thalidomide (MPT). However, pts who relapse on frontline LEN represent a growing population for whom there is limited clinical evidence on subsequent treatment. Factors associated with relapse within 12 mos in Rd- and MPT-treated pts (LDH ≥ 200 U/L, ISS stage III, high-risk cytogenetics, ECOG PS ≥ 2, and baseline platelet count ≤ 150 × 109/L) indicate that the individual risk of progression may involve a combination of disease biology, genetics, and pt-specific factors (Facon, EHA 2019). Physicians may consider these early relapse factors when making treatment decisions. To characterize pts relapsing while receiving frontline LEN, this analysis evaluated Rd-treated pts from the FIRST trial who progressed while receiving LEN based on their time of relapse, type of relapse (CRAB [symptomatic] vs non-CRAB [nonsymptomatic]), and second-line treatment. METHODS: Pts randomized to Rd continuous (n = 535) or Rd for 18 cycles (n = 541) arms and who progressed while receiving LEN or within 60 days of treatment end (per IMWG criteria) were pooled and grouped according to their time of relapse after randomization (< 12 mos = early< 12; 12-18 mos = early12-18, and > 18 mos = late relapse). The data cutoff was January 2016. RESULTS: Of the 389 pts who relapsed, 203 had early< 12 relapse, 69 had early12-18 relapse, and 117 had late relapse. Pts who relapsed within the first 12 mos or between 12 and 18 mos had higher rates of elevated LDH, ISS Stage III disease, and ECOG PS 2 compared with those who relapsed beyond 18 mos (Table). Early< 12 and early12-18 relapses were also associated with poor PFS and OS outcomes. Median PFS in pts with early< 12, early12-18, and late relapse was 6.5, 15.9, and 26.4 mos, and median OS was 26.8, 41.6, and 78.0 mos, respectively (Figure). Pts with late relapse had more dose reductions prior to PD vs those with early relapse and were more likely to experience nonsymptomatic progression. Across the 3 groups, in pts experiencing a nonsymptomatic progression who started second-line treatment, 88% started second-line treatment prior to experiencing CRAB symptoms. The median time from PD to second-line treatment was shorter in those with CRAB relapse (1.4-2.5 mos) vs non-CRAB relapse (2.5-5.9 mos). Second-line treatment was reported in 170 (83.7%), 62 (89.9%), and 99 (84.6%) pts with early< 12, early12-18, and late relapse, respectively. The majority of these pts received bortezomib-based regimens (65.6% overall), most commonly bortezomib + dexamethasone, bortezomib + melphalan + prednisone, or bortezomib + alkylator (cyclophosphamide or bendamustine). Second PFS was similar regardless of time of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis focused on an emerging and clinically relevant population of transplant-ineligible pts relapsing on frontline LEN. Pts with late relapse on LEN more commonly had nonsymptomatic progression vs pts relapsing early. This raises the question on the possible impact of the immune stimulatory effects of LEN in pts able to remain on therapy and achieve a longer OS and warrants further investigation of the biological impact of IMiD agent-based therapies on long-term disease control. The increase in dose reductions in the late- vs early-relapse groups is also an important consideration for continuous treatment. Consistent with the prior analysis of the FIRST study exploring Rd and MPT-treated pts with early< 12 relapse (Facon, EHA), pts relapsing on LEN within 12 mos and between 12-18 mos both appeared to have functionally high-risk disease and represent a population with an unmet need that should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials investigating new therapeutic strategies. Due to the timing of the FIRST trial, limited novel-novel agent combination treatments were available at relapse, and the majority of pts received bortezomib-based second-line regimens. These results highlight the need for effective therapies for pts with early relapse. Further characterization of first- and second-line outcomes according to type of relapse are ongoing and will be reported at the meeting. Disclosures Dimopoulos: Sanofi Oncology: Research Funding. Hulin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria. Leleu:Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Oncopeptide: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Carsgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Delforge:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen , Takeda: Honoraria. Weisel:Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Srinivasan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Costa:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Robinson:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Facon:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text