CA180-372: An International Collaborative Phase 2 Trial of Dasatinib and Chemotherapy in Pediatric Patients with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL)

Abstract Introduction: Ph+ ALL comprises ~5% of childhood and adolescent ALL. Prior to development of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, survival rates were poor. Less than half of patients (pts) survived despite treatment with intensive chemotherapy and frequent use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first remission (CR1). The Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL0031 trial (Schultz, JCO 2009) and the EsPhALL trial (Biondi, Lancet Oncology 2012) showed adding imatinib to different intensive chemotherapy backbones improved event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in pediatric Ph+ ALL. Dasatinib is attractive to study in Ph+ ALL because it is a dual ABL/SRC TKI that is 300 times more potent than imatinib in vitro, is active against most ABL1 TKI domain mutations that cause imatinib resistance, and accumulates in the central nervous system (CNS), a sanctuary site for ALL where imatinib penetration is poor. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial of dasatinib added to the EsPhALL chemotherapy backbone in pediatric (>1-17.99 years (yrs) of age) Ph+ ALL pts at COG sites in North America and Australia and EsPhALL sites in Italy and the United Kingdom. Protocol therapy added continuous daily dasatinib (60 mg/m2) at day 15 of induction chemotherapy. The study measured minimal residual disease (MRD) by Ig/TCR PCR, flow cytometry, and BCR - ABL1 RT-PCR, with clinical actions based upon a single method, in this hierarchical order. Pts with MRD ≥ 0.05% at the end of block Ib (day 78) and those with MRD 0.005-0.05% at end of Ib who remained MRD positive at any detectable level after three additional high-risk (HR) chemotherapy blocks underwent HSCT in CR1. Dasatinib treatment post HSCT was optional. The remaining pts received chemotherapy plus daily dasatinib for 2 yrs, with cranial irradiation limited to CNS3 pts. The primary study endpoint was 3-year EFS assessed when all patients completed 3 years of follow-up. Results: From April 2012 to May 2014, 109 pts enrolled; 3 did not meet inclusion criteria and received no trial therapy. The median age was 9.0 yrs (range 1-17), 54% were males, and 80% were Caucasian. 71% had CNS1 status at baseline, 24% CNS2, and 5% CNS3. Safety analysis included all treated pts (N=106) and efficacy analysis included all treated Ph+ ALL pts (N=104; 2 pts were retrospectively diagnosed with blast crisis CML). The database lock date was 8/17/16; at this time all pts had completed therapy and 75% had ≥3 yrs of follow-up. Two pts discontinued dasatinib for toxicity (1 allergy and 1 prolonged myelosuppression post HSCT). Nineteen pts met study criteria for HSCT, and 15 received HSCT in CR1 (14.2% of pts). The remaining 91 pts (85.8%) received EsPhALL chemotherapy plus dasatinib without HSCT. Patients tolerated dasatinib combined with chemotherapy well. The primary toxicity was febrile neutropenia and infection: Grade 3+ febrile neutropenia occurred in 75.5% of pts, Grade 3+ sepsis in 18.9%; and Grade 3+ bacteremia in 13.2%. Elevated ALT (21.7%) and AST (10.4%) were the only non-hematologic, non-infectious Grade 3+ adverse events attributed to dasatinib reported in >10% of pts. Relevant Grade 3+ non-hematologic, non-infectious toxicities attributed to dasatinib included pleural effusion (3.8%), edema (3.8%), hemorrhage (2.8%), and cardiac failure (0.8%). No cases of pulmonary hypertension or pulmonary arterial hypertension were reported. All 104 treated Ph+ ALL pts achieved CR. As of the database lock date, 33 events had occurred including 5 deaths (3 in HR3 and 2 in reinduction) due to proven or suspected infection in the 91 patients receiving chemotherapy plus dasatinib, 2 deaths from infection post-HSCT in the 15 HSCT pts, and 26 relapses (chemotherapy 22/86; HSCT 4/12). Sites of relapse included isolated bone marrow (BM; 14), CNS (4), BM+CNS (3), BM+other (2), and other (3). At the time of the interim analysis the 3-yr EFS is 66.0% (95% CI, 54.8-75.0) and the 3-yr OS is 92.3% (95% CI, 85.2-96.1); updated results with all patients having at least 3 years of follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: Addition of dasatinib to the EsPhALL chemotherapy regimen is safe and effective in pediatric Ph+ ALL pts. With only 14% of pts undergoing SCT in CR1, as compared to 80% in the EsPhALL imatinib trial, this trial demonstrates similar outcomes with 3-yr EFS/OS 66.0%/92.3% in this trial vs. published 4-yr EFS/OS 61.9%/72.1% in the EsPhALL imatinib trial. Disclosures Hunger: Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Erytech Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Saha: Shire: Research Funding. Gastier Foster: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Cazzaniga: Italian Association for Cancer Research: Research Funding; Fondazione Tettamanti onlus: Employment. Borowitz: Beckman Coulter: Honoraria; Becton-Dickinson Biosciences: Research Funding; HTG Molecular: Honoraria. Gramatges: Bristol Meyer Squibb: Research Funding. Sun: Baxalta: Consultancy. Swanink: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Schrappe: Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; JAZZ Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; SigmaTau: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Research Funding. Healey: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) Plus R-CHOP in Patients with High-Risk or Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Grade 3B Follicular Lymphoma, or Transformed Lymphoma (AFT-08)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114438 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2964-2964 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Peter Martin ◽

Nancy L. Bartlett ◽

Julio C. Chavez ◽

John L. Reagan ◽

Sonali M. Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: For patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), resistance to standard R-CHOP immunochemotherapy remains an urgent and unmet clinical challenge. Aberrant DNA methylation likely contributes to chemoresistance and may represent a therapeutic target.In a phase I study of R-CHOP plus subcutaneous azacitidine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, complete responses (CRs) were achieved in 10/11 high-risk DLBCL patients (Clozel et al. Cancer Discovery 2013), providing the rationale for this study of oral azacytidine (CC-486) plus R-CHOP. Previously reported data from the dose escalation phase of this study demonstrated promising response rates in patients with high-risk DLBCL (Martin et al. Blood 2017). Here, we present results from both the dose escalation and expansion phases after substantially longer follow-up. Methods: CC-486-DLBCL-001 (NCT02343536) is a phase I, open-label, multicenter study of CC-486 plus standard R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated DLBCL, grade 3B follicular lymphoma (FL), or transformed FL. Eligible patients were aged ≥18-80 years with no active viral hepatitis, had an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score ≥2 or DLBCL double-positive for BCL2 and c-MYC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, and Ann Arbor stage II-IV disease. Patients in the dose escalation phase were enrolled sequentially into 4 dose cohorts of CC-486 (100, 150, 200, and 300 mg) using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. Additional patients were enrolled in the expansion phase to evaluate preliminary efficacy. Patients received up to six 21-day cycles. CC-486 was administered for 7 days before initiation of R-CHOP and on days 8-21 of cycles 1-5. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was mandated by protocol and anti-emetics were standard treatment. The primary objectives were to determine safety (per NCI CTCAE v4.03) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of CC-486 in combination with standard R-CHOP. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy per the International Working Group criteria (Cheson et al.J Clin Oncol 2014). Results: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled as of May 31, 2018, including 40 treated at the RP2D of CC-486 300 mg. The median age in the overall population was 66 years (range, 25-80), 76% were aged >60 years, 59% were male, and 59% had an IPI score ≥3. Fifty-four patients (92%) completed all 6 planned cycles of study treatment. Thirteen patients (22%) had CC-486 dose reductions because of adverse events (AEs). Two patients discontinued CC-486 due to AEs: febrile neutropenia (n=1; 150 mg) and sepsis (n=1; 300 mg). The most common AEs were gastrointestinal, which were mainly grade 1/2; hematologic AEs were the most common grade 3/4 toxicity (Table 1). Grade 3/4 AEs related to CC-486 occurred in 36 (61%) patients, most commonly neutropenia (41%) and febrile neutropenia (20%). Febrile neutropenia was more common among older patients (9/15 patients with this AE were aged >70 years) and those with IPI scores ≥3 versus ≤2 (31% vs 17%) but was not correlated with CC-486 dose. One patient died during the study (acute respiratory failure possibly related to study treatment). All patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 95%, with 52 patients (88%) achieving a CR; response rates were generally similar in patients with IPI scores ≥3 and ≤2 and in patients treated at the RP2D (Table 2). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (median follow-up of 12 months); estimated 1-year PFS rates were similar in the overall population (86%) and in patients with IPI scores ≥3 (84%) and ≤2 (89%). Conclusions: Epigenetic priming with CC-486 before R-CHOP demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients with high-risk, previously untreated DLBCL, transformed FL, or grade 3B FL. AEs were generally consistent with the known safety profile of azacitidine and toxicities associated with R-CHOP. These results support further investigation of oral azacitidine (CC-486) in combination with R-CHOP, including patients with high-risk disease. Disclosures Martin: Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Bartlett:Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; ImaginAB: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Acerta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding. Chavez:Merck: Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Humanigen: Consultancy. Reagan:Alexion: Honoraria; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Smith:Portola: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy. LaCasce:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Humanigen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Data safety and monitoring board; Research to Practice: Speakers Bureau. Jones:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Drew:Celgene Corp.: Employment. Wu:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cerchietti:Celgene: Research Funding; Weill Cornell Medicine: Employment. Leonard:ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Biotest: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Sutro: Consultancy; United Therapeutics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase 3b UPFRONT Study: Safety and Efficacy of Weekly Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy After Bortezomib-Based Induction Regimens In Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.619.619 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 619-619 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Robert M. Rifkin ◽

Nashat Y Gabrail ◽

Veena Charu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Duration ◽

Study Endpoint ◽

Primary Study ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

D 20

Abstract Abstract 619 The UPFRONT study is a US community-based, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3b trial comparing the safety and efficacy of three bortezomib (Velcade®, Vc)-based regimens, VcD (Vc-dexamethasone), VcTD (Vc-thalidomide-dexamethasone), and VcMP (Vc-melphalan-prednisone), followed by Vc maintenance, in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients ineligible for high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation. Patients with previously untreated, symptomatic, measurable MM were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 49 weeks of therapy: 24 weeks (eight 21-day cycles) of induction with VcD, VcTD, or VcMP (VcD: Vc 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8, 11; D 20 mg, days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 [cycles 1–4]), days 1, 2, 4, 5 [cycles 5–8]); VcTD: Vc 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8, 11; T 100 mg/d, d1–21; D 20 mg, days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 [cycles 1–4]), days 1, 2, 4, 5 [cycles 5–8]); VcMP: Vc 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8, 11; M 9 mg/m2 and P 60 mg/m2, day 1–4, every other cycle), followed by 25 weeks (five 35-day cycles) of maintenance with weekly Vc (1.6 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, 22). Here we present updated results after 300 patients had the opportunity to undergo the entire 13-cycle treatment period (8 induction + 5 maintenance cycles). The primary study endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints include efficacy (overall response rate [ORR], complete response [CR]/near-CR [nCR] and very good partial response [≥VGPR] rates), safety and tolerability, and response duration. Responses were assessed by investigators using central laboratory data, applying modified International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Patients in the VcD, VcTD, and VcMP arms had median ages of 73.5, 73.0, and 72.0 years, respectively; 85%, 64%, and 74% had ISS stage II/III, and 22%, 27%, and 28% were non-Caucasian. Patients received a median of 9 (VcD), 6 (VcTD), and 7 (VcMP) treatment cycles (induction + maintenance); 56%, 33%, and 43% of patients, respectively, received Vc maintenance. In the VcD, VcTD, and VcMP arms, Vc dose intensity (mean ratio of doses received/doses planned) was 76%, 63%, and 69% during induction, and 73%, 77%, and 85% during maintenance, respectively. All three Vc-based induction regimens exhibited substantial efficacy after 8 cycles, with ORRs (≥PR; best confirmed response) of 68%, 78%, and 71% for VcD, VcTD, and VcMP, respectively. After 5 cycles of Vc maintenance, the ORR was increased to 71%, 79%, and 73% in the VcD, VcTD, and VcMP arms, respectively. Similar trends were seen in CR+nCR and ≥VGPR rates after Vc maintenance in the VcD, VcTD, and VcMP arms: CR+nCR rates were 24%, 36%, and 31% after induction versus 31%, 38%, and 34% after Vc maintenance, and ≥VGPR rates were 36%, 44%, and 40% after induction versus 39%, 47%, and 44% after Vc maintenance, respectively (Table). After 13 treatment cycles, the rates of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were 74%, 86%, and 80% for patients in the VcD, VcTD, and VcMP arms, respectively; similar to the rates reported after 8 cycles, 70%, 84%, and 79%, respectively. After 13 cycles, the five most common grade ≥3 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (PN) (18%, 28%, and 21% for VcD, VcTD, and VcMP, respectively), fatigue (10%, 15%, 8%), diarrhea (11%, 5%, 10%), neutropenia (1%, 3%, 21%), and pneumonia (11%, 6%, 6%). The incidence of serious AEs was highest in the VcTD arm (61%, vs 57% with VcD and 51% with VcMP). All-grade PN was most frequently reported in the VcTD arm (61%), versus the VcD (49%) and VcMP (45%) arms; these rates are similar to those reported after 8 induction cycles (59%, 45%, and 43% for the VcTD, VcD, and VcMP arms). Rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were 7%, 4%, and 2%, and 4%, 3%, and 1%, respectively, in the VcD, VcTD, and VcMP arms. Study drug discontinuation due to AEs was highest in the VcTD arm (41%, vs 29% with VcD and 35% with VcMP). In conclusion, maintenance with Vc monotherapy is well tolerated when administered after VcD, VcTD, and VcMP induction regimens. Response rates, including CR and ≥VGPR, improved after Vc maintenance with no concomitant increase in the incidence of PN. Patients continue to be monitored for PFS and response duration. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Discussion of Velcade in a novel combination in frontline myeloma is included. Flinn:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rifkin:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau; Dendreon: Speakers Bureau. Gabrail:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Charu:Amgen: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Pfizer: Equity Ownership; GSK: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Lilly: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Equity Ownership. Neuwirth:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Corzo:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Reeves:Celgene: Common stock in Celgene.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide and prednisone for myelofibrosis: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) phase 2 trial E4903

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2010-05-287417 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (22) ◽

pp. 4436-4438 ◽

Cited By ~ 93

Author(s):

Ruben A. Mesa ◽

Xiaopan Yao ◽

Larry D. Cripe ◽

Chin Yang Li ◽

Mark Litzow ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Cooperative Group ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Phase 2 Trial ◽

Nonhematologic Toxicity ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Bone Marrow Analysis ◽

Dose Prednisone

A multicenter Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) phase 2 trial assessed whether adding prednisone to lenalidomide would improve previously reported responses in persons with myelofibrosis (MF). Forty-eight subjects with anemia (42 evaluable) received lenalidomide, 10 mg/d, with a 3-month low-dose prednisone taper. Ten subjects received 3 months, and 25 received 6 months of therapy. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity with 88% with ≥ grade 3 hematologic toxicity and 45% ≥ grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. There were responses in 10 subjects (23%) using the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT)–defined clinical improvement of anemia in 8 (19%) and/or decreased spleen size in 4 (10%). Serial bone marrow analysis showed no resolution of disease-related fibrosis or angiogenesis. With a median follow-up of 2.3 years, 23 subjects are alive. Lenali-domide and prednisone for myelofibro-sis evaluated through a multicentered-cooperative group mechanism is only modestly active and myelosuppre-sive. This study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00227591.

Download Full-text

Atezolizumab + obinutuzumab + venetoclax in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (R/R iNHL): Primary analysis of a phase 2 trial from LYSA.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.7544 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 7544-7544

Author(s):

Charles Herbaux ◽

Herve Ghesquieres ◽

Reda Bouabdallah ◽

Stephanie Guidez ◽

Emmanuel Gyan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽

Safety Data ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Phase 2 Trial ◽

Ann Arbor ◽

Baseline Characteristics ◽

Grade 3

7544 Background: R/R iNHL treatment remains challenging. Atezolizumab (ATE) and obinutuzumab (OBI) are monoclonal antibodies acting respectively to inhibit T-lymphocyte exhaustion or by inducing lymphoma cells cytotoxicity, whereas venetoclax (VEN) is a small molecule inhibiting BCL-2. Combining tumor-targeted therapies with agents that enhance anti-tumor immunity represents an attractive treatment paradigm. This LYSA sponsored multicenter phase 2 trial (NCT03276468) evaluated ATE, OBI and VEN combination in R/R B-cell lymphomas. Herein, we present primary efficacy and safety data from the iNHL cohort including Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and Marginal Zone Lymphomas (MZL). Methods: Patients ≥18 years with biopsy-confirmed R/R FL and MZL who failed at least one line of therapy were eligible. OBI was given IV at 1 g on day (D) 1, 8 and 15 of cycle (C) 1 and on D1 from C2 to C8 every 3 weeks. ATE was given IV, 1.2 g every 3 weeks, started at D2 of C1, then administered at D2 of each cycle for 24 cycles. VEN was given orally at 800 mg/D at full dose, starting on D8C1 for 24 cycles. The primary endpoint was the Overall Response Rate (ORR) evaluated by Lugano criteria at the end of induction (EOI) after 8 cycles of ATE, OBI and VEN (M6) or at premature treatment discontinuation. Results: At the time of the primary analysis (08 Jan 2021), 78 patients were enrolled. FL cohort (n = 58): the median follow-up was 14.5 months. Main baseline characteristics were: Ann Arbor Stage III/IV, 85.7%; FLIPI HR, 47.3%; > 2 prior lines of therapy, 32.1%; and exposed to ASCT, 30.4%. The ORR on PET scan at EOI was measured at 53.6% [41.8%-65.1%], including 30.4% of CMR. 37 patients (63%) received the full induction treatment. MZL cohort (n = 20; 13 nMZL, 5 eMZL, 2 sMZL): the median follow-up was 11.9 months. Main baseline characteristics were: Ann Arbor Stage IV, 100%; bone marrow infiltration, 38.9%; ≥ 2 extra-nodal sites, 50%; and > 2 prior lines of therapy, 22.2%. The ORR on CT scan at EOI was measured at 66.76% [44.6%-84.4%], including 16.7% of CR and 50.0% PR. 11 patients (55%) received the full induction treatment. At time of the present analysis, responses in the 2 cohorts seem durable with only 21,4% of responders who have reported relapse/progression. Out of the 78 pts, a total of 55 (70.5%) pts experienced grade 3–4 adverse event (AE) and 1 patient experienced an AE that led to discontinuation of any drug. Main AE of grade 3 or more were hematologic cytopenias, with only one febrile neutropenia (1.3%). Three pts experienced immune-related AE (1 grade 2 myositis and 2 grade 3 colitis), no tumor lysis syndrome was observed. Conclusions: ATE, OBI and VEN triplet appears to be well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicity brought by the combination. The ORR at EOI seems to be comparable to other innovative regiments in this setting, with durable responses to date. Clinical trial information: NCT03276468.

Download Full-text

Phase 3 Study of Pomalidomide with Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone Versus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Asian Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma (RRMM) - Interim Analysis of a Trial By the Asian Myeloma Network (AMN)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139019 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1-1

Author(s):

Wee-Joo Chng ◽

Xinhua Li ◽

Cindy Lin ◽

Jin Seok Kim ◽

Hiroshi Handa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Interim Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Prior Exposure ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Asian Patients ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Experienced Grade

Background Pomalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that has been approved for the treatment of relapse refractory myeloma. A previous small randomized phase 2 study in the United States showed that combination of Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induce a greater response rate than pomalidomide and dexamethasone1. In our prior study, AMN0012, we should that in patients with sub-optimal response to pomalidomide and dexamethasone, the addition of cyclophosphamide can increase response resulting in improvement of progression free survival. In the current study, we seek to randomize Asian patients with RRMM between PCD and PD to confirm the benefit of PCD. Method We conducted a prospective randomized trial of pomalidomide (4mg daily for 21 days followed by 7 days rest) plus dexamethasone 40mg once weekly for 4 weeks with or without cyclophosphamide (400mg once a week) in patients with relapse and refractory myeloma that has to be refractory to lenalidomide and has prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors. Each cycle is 4 weeks. Patients from Singapore, Japan and Korea (NCT03143049) were included in this Asian Myeloma Network trial. The trial was started in Sep 2017 and is still ongoing. To date, 53 patients have been recruited so far. This interim report presents data available up till the data cut-off date of 24 June 2020. Results Forty-six patients have available base line information and safety data and is included in this interim analysis. 50% of patients are male and median age of the cohort is 68 years old. 39% and 28% of patients are International Stage System (ISS) stage 2 and 3 respectively. 20% of patients have abnormal creatinine clearance. Median prior line of treatment is 3. All patients are refractory to lenalidomide and 96% have prior exposure to bortezomib. In addition, 12 patients (26%) and 5 (11%) have been treated with Carfilzomib and Ixazomib respectively. 15 (33%) patients had prior high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant. 20 (44%) patients required dose reduction of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide or dexamethasone. 89% of patients experience adverse events (AEs) of any grade. Of the 297 episodes of AEs, 43% are grade 3 or higher, with 50% of these episodes related to the study drugs. 57% of patients experienced serious AEs (SAEs) of any grade. Of the 74 episodes of SAE, 89% are grade 3 or higher, with 49% of these episodes related to the study drugs. Almost all of these events are related to cytopenias and infections. 20 (44%) of the patients develop grade 3 neutropenic fever and 9 (20%) patients have grade 3 or higher pneumonia. Only 1 patient experienced grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, 1 patient develop grade 3 pulmonary embolism, 1 patient developed grade 3 venous thromboembolism, and 1 patient experienced grade 3 renal impairment. At a median follow-up of 10.9 months, 9 of the 46 patients have died, and 21 have progressed. Three patients withdrew due to toxicity. While the overall response of the study population is not part of this interim analysis, we assessed the response of patients from the National University Cancer Institute, Singapore which has the highest number of patients recruited to get an idea of the therapeutic efficacy. Of the 14 patients recruited at NCIS, 1 patient achieved CR, 3 VGPR, 7 PR, producing a response rate of 79%. Conclusion In this interim analysis of a prospective randomized study of pomalidomide and dexamethasone with or without cyclophosphamide in Asian patients, we demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of this combination. Longer follow-up and final analysis of the study will be needed to ascertain the therapeutic advantage of PCD over PD in relapse and refractory myeloma that is refractory to lenalidomide. References 1. Baz RC, Martin TG 3rd, Lin HY, Zhao X, Shain KH, Cho HJ, Wolf JL, Mahindra A, Chari A, Sullivan DM, Nardelli LA, Lau K, Alsina M, Jagannath S. Randomized multicenter phase 2 study of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone in relapsed refractory myeloma. Blood. 2016 May 26;127(21):2561-8. 2. Soekojo CY, Kim K, Huang SY, Chim CS, Takezako N, Asaoku H, Kimura H, Kosugi H, Sakamoto J, Gopalakrishnan SK, Nagarajan C, Wei Y, Moorakonda R, Lee SL, Lee JJ, Yoon SS, Kim JS, Min CK, Lee JH, Durie B,Chng WJ. 3. Pomalidomide and dexamethasone combination with additional cyclophosphamide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (AMN001)-a trial by the Asian Myeloma Network. Blood Cancer J. 2019 Oct 8;9(10):83. Disclosures Chng: Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.2719.2719 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 2719-2719 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Luhua Wang ◽

Luis Fayad ◽

Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽

Sattva Neelapu ◽

Felipe Samaniego ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2719 Poster Board II-695 Background: Rituximab directly targets CD20 positive lymphoma cells while lenalidomide targets the microenvironment. This combination was proven effective in vitro and in vivo in mantle cell lymphoma (Wu et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008; Zhang et al, Am J Hematol 2009). Clinically, lenalidomide (Habermann et al, Br J Haematol 2009) and rituximab have single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and may be an effective combination. The goal of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1 and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in phase 2. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle, and rituximab (375 mg/m2) weekly during cycle 1. Dose escalation was used to determine the MTD with lenalidomide (10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic, or grade 4 hematologic adverse events in cycle 1. Phase 2 has reached targeted enrolment with 45 patients treated at MTD. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival rate and response duration. Median time to event in months with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Of 45 patients treated at the MTD, the median age was 66 (46–85), 91% were males. All patients had received prior rituximab and were enrolled regardless of prior rituximab sensitivity or resistance. Results: The median follow-up time for the censored observations was 11.4 months. Two DLTs occurred at 25 mg in phase 1 (hypercalcemia, non-neutropenic fever); therefore, the MTD was 20 mg. The grade 3–4 non-hematologic events included elevated AST, elevated ALT, fatigue, myalgia, tremors, ataxia, cough, deep vein thrombosis, dyspnea, edema (facial), infection, neuropathy sensory, rash, and respiratory failure. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (37 events), neutropenic fever (4 events), and thrombocytopenia (16 events). There were no responses in patients treated at 10 mg or 15 mg. Thirty six patients (36) were evaluable for response. Nine (9) patients are too early in their treatment and are not yet eligible for response evaluation. Among the 36 evaluable patients, 11 (31%) patients achieved CR, 8 (22%) patients achieved PR, 3 (8%) patients had minor response, 6 (17%) patients had stable disease and 8 (22%) patients had progressive mantle cell lymphoma. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 53%. Seventy eight (78%) patients achieved stable disease or better and benefited from oral Lenalidomide plus 4 doses of rituximab. The median time to response was 2 months (2–8), and the median duration of response for the 19 patients with CR or PR was 18 months (95% CI: 10.6, NA) (range1–30 months). The median progression free survival for all patients on phase 2 was 14 months (95% CI: 9.8, NA) (ranging from 1–32 months). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in relapsed/refractory MCL with a favourable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Wang: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagemeister:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Samaniego:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Yi:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Knight:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.603.603 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 603-603 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽

Steven D. Gore ◽

Christopher R. Cogle ◽

Elias J. Jabbour ◽

M. Renee Ward ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Phase I ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Treatment Schedule ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Transfusion Independence ◽

Clinical Responses ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 603 Parenteral azacitidine (AZA) is approved for administration on days 1–7 of a 28-day treatment schedule. Based on the short plasma half-life of AZA, S-phase restricted incorporation into DNA, and rapid re-methylation of DNA, it is possible that chronic daily exposure could enhanced its clinical activity. An oral formulation would be convenient and allow evaluation of lower doses administered on extended schedules. The initial phase I study of oral AZA, administered daily on a 7-day schedule demonstrated that it was bioavailable, safe, and clinically active in patients with MDS and AML (Garcia-Manero G, et al. Blood 2009;114:A117). Here, we report the results of a multicenter phase I exploration of extended oral AZA schedules, including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and preliminary response data. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with MDS, CMML or AML (not candidates for other therapies) were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were a hemoglobin level of ≤ 9.0 g/dL, and/or platelet count of ≤ 50 × 109/L, and/or be RBC transfusion-dependent; prior azanucleoside therapy was not permitted. Patients received oral AZA daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) on 14- or 21-days schedules, with starting at a dose of 300 mg for QD dosing and 200 mg for BID dosing. Patients were enrolled into cohorts of 6 and evaluated for DLTs at the end of Cycle 1. Patients were monitored continuously for adverse events (AEs) and assessed for disease response at the end of every second cycle. During Cycle 1, on the first and last day of treatment, PK parameters were derived from AZA concentrations in the plasma after the first dose of the day. PD samples were collected during the first 2 cycles and DNA methylation changes were evaluated using a LINE-1 assay. To date, 25 patients (median age 68 years [range 44–87]; 14 male and 11 female) with MDS (n = 13), AML (n = 7 de novo and n = 3 transformed), and CMML (n = 2) have received oral AZA on extended treatment schedules. Two DLTs, grade 3 nausea and grade 3 vomiting, occurred in 1 of 6 DLT-evaluable patients treated at 14-days QD (n = 7). No DLTs were observed on the 21-day QD (n = 6) or 14-day BID (n = 6) schedules; safety evaluation for the 21-day BID schedule is ongoing (n = 6). The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached on these schedules; no patient has received > 300 mg per dose. Overall rates of all grades nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal pain with the extended schedules were similar to those observed with the oral 7-day schedule. The rate of febrile neutropenia (all grades) was higher in the 21-day QD cohort. This was observed in 4 patients with baseline ANC < 500 and/or AML diagnosis. Most common grade 3/4 AEs in the QD schedules were febrile neutropenia (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 4/6), anemia (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 0/6), thrombocytopenia (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 1/6), diarrhea (14-day, 0/7; 21-day, 1/6), nausea (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 0/6), and vomiting (14-day, 1/7; 21-day, 0/6). Extended BID schedules are under evaluation. PK data have been generated for 19 of 25 patients. For the 300 mg 14-day QD, 300 mg 21-day QD, and 200 mg 14-day BID schedules, using mean AUC (first and last day) results, extrapolated cumulative exposures per cycle were ~28%, 42% and 26%, respectively, compared with historical exposure observed following subcutaneous administration. AZA exposure increased with increasing dose, but was not dose-proportional. Clinical responses were observed for MDS/CMML patients on both extended QD schedules, with assessment ongoing for BID schedules (Table). In summary, extended (14- and 21-day) dosing of oral AZA is generally well tolerated, with no AZA accumulation, and promising clinical responses were observed, including complete remission (CR), marrow CR (mCR), and hematologic improvement (HI). Table. Parameter, n (%) Oral AZA Treatment Schedule MDS/CMML Responders/Evaluable patients, (%) 14-day QD 21-day QD Overall response* (CR, mCR, any HI) 5/6 (83) 3/3 (100) CR 0/6 2/3 (67) mCR 0/6 3/3 (100) HI 5/6 (83) 3/3 (100) HI-erythroid 3/5 (60) 1/1 (100) HI-platelet† 2/5 (40) 3/3 (100) HI-neutrophil 0/1 0/1 Transfusion independence 3/4 (75) 1/2 (50) RBC 1/2 (50) 1/1 (100) Platelet 2/2 (100) 0/1 * International Working Group 2006 criteria, patients only counted once for overall response, but may be counted more than once in individual response categories. † Includes patients achieving partial (≥ 50%) or complete platelet transfusion independence. Disclosures: Gore: Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Cogle:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Ward:Celgene: Equity Ownership. MacBeth:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Laille:Celgene: Employment. Giordano:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Celgene: Research Funding. Skikne:Celgene: Employment.

Download Full-text

Escalated Dose Bortezomib Once Weekly Combined with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (eVRD) Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance in First Relapse of Multiple Myeloma (MM). the HOVON 86 Phase 2 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1853.1853 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1853-1853

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Okke de Weerdt ◽

Mark-David Levin ◽

Wendimagegn Ghidey ◽

Edo Vellenga ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Partial Response ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Level 3 ◽

First Relapse ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 1853 Background: Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) combined with Lenalidomide (10–25 mg) and Dexamethasone (VRD) is effective in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Reported data on the effect of these drugs in relapse/refractory MM are available from the APEX and MM-009/MM-010 trials, respectively. These trials, however, were performed in patients with 2–8 prior regimens. Aim: This investigator sponsored two-step phase 2 HOVON trial was designed to evaluate escalated dosages of Bortezomib (B) given once weekly and daily Lenalidomide (L) combined with weekly Dexamethasone (D) (eVRD) followed by Lenalidomide maintenance in an homogenous group of patients with symptomatic MM in first relapse. The goal was to explore the maximum tolerated dose of this combination in order to achieve a durable second remission. Methods: Dose levels were B 1.3 mg/m2, L 10 mg, (level 1); B 1.6 mg/m2, L 10 mg (level 2); B 1.6 mg/m2, L 15 mg (level 3); B 1.6 mg/m2, L 20 mg (level 4). D dose was 20 mg days 1–2, 8–9, 15–16 in all dose levels. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic MM ISS stage 1–3, aged 18–80 in first relapse after initial treatment. The primary endpoint was response (complete response (CR) according to IMWG criteria, very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), together overall response (ORR)) with Progression-free Survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity as secondary endpoints. Results: Eighty-one patients were included, i.e. 15 patients in dose levels 1, 2 and 3, followed by 66 in the phase 2 part. This report is based on 12 patients in the dose escalation phase and the first 42 patients in the phase 2 part. Median age was 67 yrs, with ISS stages 1 (56%), 2 (40%) and 3 (5%). 37/54 patients had received HDM followed by stem cell transplant as part of first-line treatment. The MTD was reached at dose level 3 when the maximum of 3 SAEs in 5 patients was observed. After establishment of the MTD, the phase 2 part of the trial was performed with B 1.6 mg/m2 once weekly for 3 weeks, L 20 mg days 1–21 and D 20 mg days 1–2, 8–9, 15–16, for 8 cycles of 28 days followed by L maintenance 10 mg days 1–21 of a 28 days cycle. The median number of cycles was 6 in the dose-escalation phase and 7 cycles in phase 2. 7/12 (58%) patients in the dose-escalation phase and 23/42 (55%) patients in phase 2 started lenalidomide maintenance. Reasons for premature discontinuation of the protocol treatment were toxicity (14%), progression (24%), no response (5%) or other (14%). Polyneuropathy grade 3–4 occurred in 19% with a median time to maximum PNP of 123 days. Hematological toxicity grade 3 and 4 was observed in 29 % of patients In the phase 2 part including 42 patients the ORR was 92 %, ≥VGPR 64% and CR/nCR 30%. Median time to response was 1.1 cycles. At a median follow-up of 13.6 months PFS at 18 months was 52% and OS 76%. Among predetermined risk factors ISS stage, prior HDM/ASCT and achieved response on protocol, depth of response was the only significant factor which was associated with PFS (p<0.001) and OS (p<0.001), Eight patients died from progressive MM (n=4) or other causes (n=4). One second primary malignancy was observed in dose level 3. Conclusions: Escalated VRD followed by Lenalidomide maintenance is effective and feasible in patients with first relapse MM. We will present an updated follow-up at ASH This trial was registered as Eudract nr 2007–002533–37. Unrestricted grants and study drug were provided by Janssen and Celgene. Disclosures: Sonneveld: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Findings From Comfort-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy (BAT) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.801.801 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 801-801 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Francisco Cervantes ◽

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽

Dietger Niederwieser ◽

Andres Sirulnik ◽

Viktoriya Stalbovskaya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Extension Phase ◽

Spleen Volume ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 801 Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1 & 2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of MF. In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label study evaluating ruxolitinib versus BAT in patients (pts) with MF. The primary and key secondary endpoints were both met: the proportion of pts achieving a response (defined as a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 48 (ruxolitinib, 28.5%; BAT, 0%; P < .0001) and 24 (31.9% and 0%; P < .0001), respectively. The present analyses update the efficacy and safety findings of COMFORT-II (median follow-up, 112 wk). Methods: In COMFORT-II, 219 pts with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF and splenomegaly were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg bid, based on baseline platelet count [100-200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively]) or BAT. Efficacy results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis; a loss of spleen response was defined as a > 25% increase in spleen volume over on-study nadir that is no longer a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 112 wk (ruxolitinib, 113; BAT, 108), and the median duration of exposure 83.3 wk (ruxolitinib, 111.4 [randomized and extension phases]; BAT, 45.1 [randomized treatment only]). Because the core study has completed, all pts have either entered the extension phase or discontinued from the study. The primary reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; ruxolitinib, 11.6%; BAT, 6.8%), consent withdrawal (4.1% and 12.3%), and disease progression (2.7% and 5.5%). Overall, 72.6% of pts (106/146) in the ruxolitinib arm and 61.6% (45/73) in the BAT arm entered the extension phase to receive ruxolitinib, and 55.5% (81/146) of those originally randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. The primary reasons for discontinuation from the extension phase were progressive disease (8.2%), AEs (2.1%), and other (4.1%). Overall, 70 pts (48.3%) treated with ruxolitinib achieved a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study, and 97.1% of pts (132/136) with postbaseline assessments experienced a clinical benefit with some degree of reduction in spleen volume. Spleen reductions of ≥ 35% were sustained with continued ruxolitinib therapy (median duration not yet reached); the probabilities of maintaining the spleen response at wk 48 and 84 are 75% (95% CI, 61%-84%) and 58% (95% CI, 35%-76%), respectively (Figure). Since the last report (median 61.1 wk), an additional 9 and 12 deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively, resulting in a total of 20 (14%) and 16 (22%) deaths overall. Although there was no inferential statistical testing at this unplanned analysis, pts randomized to ruxolitinib showed longer survival than those randomized to BAT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00). As expected, given the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib as a JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, the most common new or worsened grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities during randomized treatment were anemia (ruxolitinib, 40.4%; BAT, 23.3%), lymphopenia (22.6%; 31.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9.6%; 9.6%). In the ruxolitinib arm, mean hemoglobin levels decreased over the first 12 wk of treatment and then recovered to levels similar to BAT from wk 24 onward; there was no difference in the mean monthly red blood cell transfusion rate among the ruxolitinib and BAT groups (0.834 vs 0.956 units, respectively). Nonhematologic AEs were primarily grade 1/2. Including the extension phase, there were no new nonhematologic AEs in the ruxolitinib group that were not observed previously (in ≥ 10% of pts), and only 1 pt had a new grade 3/4 AE (epistaxis). Conclusion: In COMFORT-II, ruxolitinib provided rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly; this analysis demonstrates that these reductions are sustained over 2 years of treatment in the majority of pts. Ruxolitinib-treated pts showed longer survival than those receiving BAT, consistent with the survival advantage observed in previous (Verstovsek et al. NEJM. 2012) and current analyses of COMFORT-I, as well as with the comparison of pts of the phase 1/2 study with matched historical controls (Verstovsek et al. Blood. 2012). Disclosures: Cervantes: Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Celgene: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: AdvisoryBoard Other, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, stock options Other. Passamonti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barbui:Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Interim Results of an International, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), in Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): Durable Efficacy and Tolerability with Longer Follow-up

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.904.904 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 904-904 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Michael Wang ◽

Simon A. Rule ◽

Peter Martin ◽

Andre Goy ◽

Rebecca Auer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Tumor Response ◽

Single Agent ◽

Safety Data ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 904 Background Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a central mediator of B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling which is essential for normal B-cell development. Ibrutinib is an orally administered inhibitor of BTK that induces apoptosis and inhibits cellular migration and adhesion in malignant B-cells. MCL is an aggressive subtype of NHL, and despite high response rates to initial therapy, patients often relapse with acquired chemotherapy resistance and short response durations to conventional therapy. Preliminary results in 51 evaluable patients from the Phase 2 PCYC-1104 study demonstrated ibrutinib could achieve rapid nodal responses (including complete responses) in relapsed and refractory MCL patients (Wang et al, ASH 2011). Treatment with ibrutinib was associated with a transient increase in peripheral lymphocyte count representing a compartmental shift of cells with the CD19+/CD5+ phenotype from nodal tissues to peripheral blood (Chang et al, ASH 2011). Reported here are interim results of an international study of single-agent ibrutinib in previously treated MCL. Methods Subjects with relapsed or refractory MCL who were either bortezomib-naïve or bortezomib-exposed (prior treatment with at least 2 cycles of bortezomib) were enrolled. Ibrutinib was administered orally at 560mg daily (in continuous 28-day cycles) until disease progression. Bortezomib-naive and bortezomib-exposed cohorts were evaluated separately. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles according to the revised International Working Group for NHL criteria. The primary endpoint of the study is overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints include: duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Subjects A total of 115 subjects (65 bortezomib-naïve and 50 bortezomib-exposed) were enrolled between February 15, 2011 and July 3, 2012. Of the 111 subjects treated, 109 subjects were evaluable for efficacy (received at least one dose of ibrutinib and underwent ≥ 1 tumor response assessment). Baseline characteristics include median age 68 years (40–84), median time since diagnosis 42 months, median number of prior treatments 3 (1–6), bulky disease (≥ 10 cm) 13%, Ann Arbor stage IV at screening 77.4%, prior stem cell transplant 9.6%, high risk by MIPI score at baseline assessment 48.7%, and refractory disease 44.3%. Results Safety data are available for 111 subjects. Treatment-emergent AEs occurring in ≥ 15% of subjects: diarrhea (35%), fatigue (32%), upper respiratory tract infections (23%), nausea (21%), rash (21%), dyspnea (20%), and oedema peripheral (15%). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurring in ≥ 5% of subjects were neutropenia (11%), anemia (5%), diarrhea (5%), dyspnea (5%), pneumonia (5%), and thrombocytopenia (5%). Grade 4 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (5%), hyperuricaemia (2%), and pancytopenia (1%). One grade 5 AE, pneumonia, was thought to be treatment-related. In the efficacy evaluable subjects, the ORR (complete + partial responses) is reported in Table 1. The median time on treatment was 6.0 months (0.7-16.6 months); 53% of subjects remain on treatment. Median DOR, PFS and OS have not been reached: 9 month DOR 65%, 12 month estimation of PFS 53% and OS 67%. Responses to ibrutinib increase with longer time on study treatment. Time to PR ranged from 1.4 – 8.3 months (median 1.9) and CR ranged from 1.7 – 11.2 months (median 3.9). This is seen with longer follow-up on the initial 51 subjects reported at ASH 2011: median time on study treatment was 3.8 months and is now 11.3 months; ORR was 69% and is now 74.5%; CR rate was 16% and is now 35.3%. Conclusions Longer follow up demonstrates the durability of responses and confirms the unprecedented single agent activity of ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory MCL in terms of ORR. The treatment- emergent AEs were consistent with safety data previously reported. A pivotal study in relapsed and refractory MCL patients following bortezomib treatment has been initiated. Disclosures: Wang: Pharmacyclic: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ibrutinib is a novel agent being studied in a clinical trial. Rule:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Martin:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Goy:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Auer:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Kahl:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Jurczak:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Advani:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. McGreivy:pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clow:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stevens-Brogan:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kunkel:Pharmacyclics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Blum:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text