Optimizing Outcome After Unrelated Marrow Transplantation by Comprehensive Matching of HLA Class I and II Alleles in the Donor and Recipient

Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. 3515-3520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Effie W. Petersdorf ◽  
Theodore A. Gooley ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Paul J. Martin ◽  
Anajane G. Smith ◽  
...  

In unrelated marrow transplantation, the benefit of matching class II HLA-DRB1 and DQB1 alleles of the donor and recipient is well documented. Little is known about the clinical relevance of matching for class I HLA-A, B, and C alleles. We used DNA-amplification methods to identify the HLA-A, B, and C alleles of 300 patients and their donors. The incidence of graft failure was correlated with multiple class I mismatching in the donor. The risk of grades III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease was highest with class II mismatching in the recipient. Mismatching for a single class I or class II allele had no effect on survival, but mortality was increased by mismatching for more than one class I allele and by simultaneous mismatching for class I and class II alleles. We conclude that matching HLA class I and class II alleles of the donor and recipient can improve outcome after unrelated marrow transplantation.

Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. 3515-3520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Effie W. Petersdorf ◽  
Theodore A. Gooley ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Paul J. Martin ◽  
Anajane G. Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract In unrelated marrow transplantation, the benefit of matching class II HLA-DRB1 and DQB1 alleles of the donor and recipient is well documented. Little is known about the clinical relevance of matching for class I HLA-A, B, and C alleles. We used DNA-amplification methods to identify the HLA-A, B, and C alleles of 300 patients and their donors. The incidence of graft failure was correlated with multiple class I mismatching in the donor. The risk of grades III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease was highest with class II mismatching in the recipient. Mismatching for a single class I or class II allele had no effect on survival, but mortality was increased by mismatching for more than one class I allele and by simultaneous mismatching for class I and class II alleles. We conclude that matching HLA class I and class II alleles of the donor and recipient can improve outcome after unrelated marrow transplantation.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 311-311
Author(s):  
Scott R Solomon ◽  
Michael T Aubrey ◽  
Cheri Anobile ◽  
Xu Zhang ◽  
Brian M Freed ◽  
...  

Abstract Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has improved the outcomes and expanded the use of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT). Unlike many other allogeneic HCT settings, the impact of HLA disparity on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and transplant outcome in this setting remains unclear. HLAMatchmaker is a computer algorithm that assesses HLA compatibility at the structural level by determining what and how many functional epitopes (eplets), defined as patches of polymorphic residues within a radius of 3.0-3.5 Ångstroms, are shared between donor and recipient. It has been useful in the identification of acceptable mismatches (mm) for alloimmunized kidney transplant candidates. In order to determine the effects of HLA class I (HLA-A, B, C) and II (HLA-DR, DQ, DP) epitope mm on transplant outcome, we retrospectively analyzed 208 consecutive donor-recipient pairs receiving haplo-HCT with PTCy for hematologic malignancy. The impact of epitope mm (GVH direction) on GVHD and survival endpoints was evaluated by Cox multivariate analysis (MVA), controlling for other significant patient, donor and transplant-related factors. Median (range) recipient and donor age was 52 (19-75) and 38 (15-73) years respectively. Patients were transplanted for AML (34%), MDS/MPS/CML (20%), ALL (17%), NHL/HD/CLL (25%). PBSC was used as the stem cell source in 66% of patients, and conditioning intensity was myeloablative in 41%. The donor was a child, sibling, or parent in 47%, 38%, and 14% respectively. Median (range) follow-up for surviving patients was 33 (7-130) months. HLA class I epitope mm had no effect on GVHD or survival. In contrast, increased HLA class II epitope mm (>16) was significantly correlated to an increased frequency of chronic GVHD (figure 1). In MVA, higher degree of class II epitope mm was associated with chronic GVHD, total (HR 1.91, p=0.012) and moderate-to-severe (HR 2.37, p=0.006). The positive effect of increased class II epitope mm on chronic GVHD was driven mostly by HLA-DQ epitope mm (HR 1.7 for >7 vs. ≤7, p=0.047) with a non-significant contribution from HLA-DP (HR 1.36 for >2 vs. ≤2, p=0.24). In contrast, increased HLA-DR epitope mm had a protective effect on chronic GVHD (HR 0.52 for >7 vs. ≤7, p=0.021). Epitope mm was not significantly associated with acute GVHD, grade 2-4 or 3-4. There was also no effect of allele-level mm at any HLA loci on acute or chronic GVHD. We next tested the impact of class I and II epitope mm on survival, including the individual impact of HLA-DR, -DQ and -DP epitope mm. Although class I epitope mm had no impact in univariate analysis, a higher number of class II epitope mm (>16) was correlated with better overall survival and the effect was primarily driven by HLA-DQ epitope mm (figure 2). To better assess the impact of class II epitope mm on survival, we analyzed this variable in the context of a previously published MVA (Solomon et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24:789-798). Controlling for other significant variables (age, race, CMV status, donor relationship, HLA-DR mm, nonpermissive HLA-DP mm, KIR receptor-ligand mm and KIR haplotype), only increased HLA-DQ epitope mm (>7) was independently associated with decreased non-relapse (HR 0.34, p=0.021) and overall mortality (HR 0.60, p=0.039). These results indicate a significant effect of class II epitope mm on chronic GVHD and survival following haplo-HCT with PTCy. Higher level of class II epitope mm and HLA-DQ epitope mm is associated with increased chronic GVHD incidence, whereas HLA-DR epitope mm is protective. Higher HLA-DQ epitope mm is independently associated with better survival, when controlling for the presence of HLA-DR allele-level mm or a nonpermissive HLA-DP mm, which have been shown previously to improve survival. Class II HLA epitope level matching provides important prognostic information in the setting of haplo-HCT and PTCy, which is not reflected by conventional allele-level matching. Disclosures Solh: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding.


2001 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wing H Leung ◽  
Victoria Turner ◽  
Stacye L Richardson ◽  
Ely Benaim ◽  
Gregory Hale ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 475-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Bray ◽  
Sandy Rosen-Bronson ◽  
Michael Haagenson ◽  
John Klein ◽  
Susan Flesch ◽  
...  

Abstract Animal studies point to a strong role for MHC-specific antibody as a cause for failed donor hematopoietic cell engraftment, but the role of donor-directed HLA-specific allo-antibodies in human transplants has been controversial. To investigate such a role, we used a retrospective case-control design and studied unrelated donor:recipient pairs whose transplants were facilitated through the NMDP. A total of 37 cases with graft failure and 78 matched control pairs were evaluated. The 37 graft failure cases were selected based on survival beyond 28 days of transplant with no sustained engraftment, and available cryopreserved recipient serum to test for HLA-specific alloantibodies. Up to 3 controls were selected for each case, and matched for disease, disease status, graft type, patient age and year of transplant. Patients had AML, ALL, CML or MDS, 98% received myeloablative conditioning regimens, 100% received T replete grafts, 97% received marrow, and 97% received calcineurin-based GVHD prophylaxis. Patients and donors were retrospectively typed for HLA-A,B,Cw,DRB1,DQB1,DQA1,DPB1,and DPA1 by sequencing or other high resolution typing methods. Stored pre-transplant serum samples (patients and controls) were retrieved from the NMDP Research Repository, and assayed for HLA antibodies by solid-phase FlowPRA (One Lambda, Inc). All positive samples were evaluated for HLA specificity by single-antigen microparticles (LabScreen, One Lambda, Inc). Among the 37 failed transplants, 11 (30%) recipients possessed alloantibodies specific for donor HLA Class I or Class II, compared to only 3 (4%) of 78 controls. HLA-DR or DQ specific antibodies were not detected; hence, all HLA Class II-specific antibodies were directed to DP. Recipients with anti-DP antibodies against the donor mismatched DP were at increased risk of graft failure, indicating the importance of recipient antibodies directed against mismatched donor DP antigens. Exact conditional logistic regression analysis for the presence of either Class I HLA-A,B,Cw or Class II HLA-DP antibodies showed similar findings (Class I alone: OR. 6.31: 95% CI 1.17–62.9; p=0.03, Class II alone: OR 12.00; 95% CI 1.46–551.97; p=0.01, Class I and II combined: OR 19.08; 95% CI 2.72–828.49; p=0.0003). Further analyses were conducted to evaluate a limited set of covariates not accounted for in the case:control study, i.e. patient CMV status, cell dose and HLA-C match. Cell dose and CMV status were independently predictive of engraftment, p=0.01 and 0.03, respectively. No effect was observed for HLA-Cw match (p=0.84). The presence of anti-donor HLA Class I or II antibodies was predictive of engraftment when adjustment was made for either cell dose (OR 15.49; 95% CI 2.06–697.83; p=0.002) or CMV status (OR 7.94; 95% CI 0.97–367.84; p=0.05). In summary, these results indicate that donor-specific HLA Class I or Class II antibodies in recipients of unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplants are associated with failed engraftment. We recommend that, as a “Standard-of-Practice”, all potential recipients be screened for the presence of HLA class I and class II antibodies including HLA DP. Donors should be excluded if they carry mismatched HLA types against which the patient has specific antibodies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document