scholarly journals Management of direct factor Xa inhibitor–related major bleeding with prothrombin complex concentrate: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siavash Piran ◽  
Rasha Khatib ◽  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Ammar Majeed ◽  
Anne Holbrook ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
The United States ◽  
Effective Management ◽  
Direct Factor ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Fxa Inhibitor

Abstract A targeted antidote for reversal of direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors is now available for clinical use in the United States, but it is costly and has limited availability. In a systematic review, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) as an alternative for managing direct FXa inhibitor–related major bleeding. A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials up to September 2018. No comparative studies were found. Ten case series with 340 patients who received PCC for direct FXa inhibitor–related major bleeding were included. The pooled proportion of patients with effective management of major bleeding was 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.76) in 2 studies using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63-0.92) in 8 studies that did not use the ISTH criteria; all-cause mortality was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.26), and thromboembolism rate was 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.08). On the basis of evidence with very low certainty from single-arm case series, it is difficult to determine whether 4F-PCC in addition to cessation of direct oral FXa inhibitor is more effective than cessation of direct oral FXa inhibitor alone in patients with direct FXa inhibitor–related major bleeding.

Utilization of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Reversal of Oral Factor Xa Inhibitor–Associated Acute Major Bleeding: A Case Series

2020 ◽  
pp. 089719002090701
Author(s):  
Tessa R. Reynolds ◽  
Brian W. Gilbert ◽  
Katherine M. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Point Analysis ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Fxa Inhibitor

Objective: In cases of oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor–associated acute major bleeding, several reversal strategies are available. Current guidelines recommend a dose of 50 U/kg if using 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC). A paucity of data exists with the use of 4F-PCC for FXa inhibitor reversal for acute major bleeding, specifically the most efficacious dosing regimens and safety data. The purpose of this case series is to describe the utilization of 4F-PCC for reversal of oral FXa inhibitor–associated acute major bleeding. Methods: This retrospective case series included all admitted patients 18 years and older who received 4F-PCC for oral FXa inhibitor–associated major bleeding. Major bleeding was defined using the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis definition for major bleeding in nonsurgical patients. The primary outcome was achievement of hemostasis. Results: A total of 31 patients met inclusion criteria, with 17 receiving rivaroxaban and 14 receiving apixaban. Intracranial hemorrhage was the most common type of bleeding occurring in 15 (55%) patients. The median dose of 4F-PCC was 37 U/kg. Of the patients evaluated in the primary end point analysis, 68% achieved effective hemostasis. Four (12.9%) patients experienced a documented thrombotic event within 7 days of receiving 4F-PCC. Conclusion: The use of 4F-PCC for FXa inhibitor–associated acute major bleeding was effective for the majority of patients. The rate of thrombotic events appears higher compared to previously published studies, although major confounders exist and larger studies are needed to fully evaluate the safety of 4F-PCC for this indication.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Major Bleeding on Factor Xa Inhibitors: A Prospective Cohort Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (05) ◽  
pp. 842-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Gross ◽  
Bruce Ritchie ◽  
Susan Nahirniak ◽  
Yulia Lin ◽  
Lani Lieberman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Reversal Agent ◽  
Major Bleed ◽  
Post Hoc

AbstractOral factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly used for anticoagulation, but there is no approved reversal agent. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) for the management of Xa-inhibitor–associated bleeding has been described in small case series and one cohort study. Patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban, suffering a major bleed, were treated at nine Canadian hospitals as per existing hospital protocol with a fixed dose of PCC 2,000 units and subsequently recruited for a 30-day follow-up. The treating physician evaluated the haemostatic effectiveness as observed during the first day as good, moderate or poor/none, using an assessment guide. Safety outcomes were thromboembolism or death. We recruited 66 patients with major bleeding who were treated with PCC and who were receiving rivaroxaban (56%) or apixaban (44%). The effectiveness was assessed as good in 65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53–77), moderate in 20% (95% CI, 10–30) and poor/none in 15% (95% CI, 6–24). For the 36 patients with intracranial haemorrhage, the corresponding ratings were 67, 17 and 17%, and for 16 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding they were 69, 12 and 19%, respectively. There were nine deaths (14%) by 30 days, and five (8%) major thromboembolic events. In a post hoc analysis, according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, reversal was effective in 68% and ineffective in 32%. For major bleeding associated with oral Xa inhibitors, PCC may have a beneficial effect. The risk of thromboembolism after reversal of anticoagulation in patients with a prothrombotic background has to be taken into account.

Extended treatment of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (7) ◽  
pp. 545-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang-Ling Wang ◽  
Nick van Es ◽  
Chris Cameron ◽  
Lana A Castellucci ◽  
Harry R Büller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitors ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Standard Intensity ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Dose Factor

ObjectiveTo evaluate efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant regimens and aspirin for extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and conference proceedings for randomised controlled trials studying vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or aspirin for secondary prevention of VTE beyond 3 months. ORs (95% credible intervals) between treatments were estimated using random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis.ResultsSixteen studies, totaling more than 22 000 patients, were included. Compared with placebo or observation and with aspirin, respectively, the risk of recurrent VTE was lower with standard-intensity VKAs (0.15 (0.08 to 0.24) and 0.23 (0.09 to 0.54)), low-dose factor Xa inhibitors (0.16 (0.06 to 0.38) and 0.25 (0.09 to 0.66)), standard-dose factor Xa inhibitors (0.17 (0.08 to 0.33) and 0.27 (0.11 to 0.65)) and the direct thrombin inhibitor (0.15 (0.04 to 0.37) and 0.23 (0.06 to 0.74)) although the risk of major bleeding was higher with standard-intensity VKAs (4.42 (1.99 to 12.24) and 4.14 (1.17 to 18.86)). Effect estimates were consistent in male patients and those with index pulmonary embolism or with unprovoked VTE and in sensitivity analyses. In addition, compared with placebo or observation, the risk of all-cause mortality was reduced with standard-intensity VKAs (0.44 (0.20 to 0.87)) and low-dose factor Xa inhibitors (0.38 (0.12 to 0.995)).ConclusionsStandard-intensity VKAs and DOACs are more efficacious than aspirin for extended VTE treatment. Despite a higher risk of major bleeding, standard-intensity VKAs was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Since overall efficacy and safety of standard-intensity VKAs and DOACs are in equipoise, patient factors, costs and patient preferences should be considered when recommending extending anticoagulation treatment.

Oral Rivaroxaban Compared with Subcutaneous Enoxaparin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis after Total Hip Arthroplasty: The RECORD1 Trial.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bengt I. Eriksson ◽  
Lars C. Borris ◽  
Richard J. Friedman ◽  
Sylvia Haas ◽  
Menno V. Huisman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitor ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Primary Efficacy Endpoint ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Direct Factor ◽  
Mitt Population ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Subcutaneous Enoxaparin

Abstract Background Thromboprophylaxis for at least 10 days and for up to 4–5 weeks is recommended after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Rivaroxaban is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. RECORD1 was a phase III, multinational, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of oral rivaroxaban, compared with subcutaneous enoxaparin, for 5 weeks of thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing THA. Methods Patients received rivaroxaban 10 mg beginning 6–8 hours after surgery and once daily (od) thereafter, or enoxaparin 40 mg od, beginning the evening before surgery (restarting 6–8 hours after surgery). Therapy continued for 35±4 days and mandatory, bilateral venography was conducted the next day. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of any deep vein thrombosis (DVT), non-fatal pulmonary embolism (PE), and all-cause mortality. The primary efficacy analysis was a test for non-inferiority in the per-protocol (PP) population, followed by a test for superiority in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. The main secondary efficacy endpoint was major venous thromboembolism (VTE): the composite of proximal DVT, non-fatal PE and VTE-related death. Major and non-major bleeding during the active treatment period were the primary and secondary safety endpoints, respectively. Results A total of 4541 patients were randomized; 4433 were eligible for the safety population, 3153 for the mITT population, and 3029 for the PP population. The criteria for non-inferiority were met and testing for superiority was performed. Rivaroxaban significantly reduced the incidence of the primary efficacy endpoint (p<0.001) and major VTE (p<0.001), compared with enoxaparin, in the mITT population (Table). The incidence of major and non-major bleeding events was similar in both groups (Table). Conclusions Rivaroxaban was significantly more effective than enoxaparin for extended prophylaxis after THA, with a similar safety profile. This is the first pivotal trial to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of a fixed, unmonitored dose of an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor - rivaroxaban - for extended thromboprophylaxis after THA. Rivaroxaban 10mg od % (n/N) Enoxaparin 40 mg od % (n/N) Relative risk reduction % (95% CI) P-value for difference DVT, non-fatal PE, and all-cause mortality 1.1% (18/1595) 3.7% (58/1558) 70% (49–82%) P<0.001 Major VTE 0.2% (4/1686) 2.0% (33/1678) 88% (66–96%) P<0.001 Major bleeding 0.3% (6/2209) 0.1% (2/2224) - P=0.178 Non-major bleeding 5.8% (128/2209) 5.8% (129/2224) - P=1.000

Abstract 12901: Novel Oral Anticoagulants Are Associated With Decreased Recurrence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Upadhaya ◽  
Seetharamprasad Madala ◽  
Sunil Badami
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Novel Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
P Value ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Introduction: Patients with cancer are at high risk for recurrent thromboembolic phenomenon. Use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) for treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in such patients is controversial. We conducted this updated meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled efficacy and safety of NOAC in patients with cancer. Methods: We did systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane library databases for randomized controlled trials comparing NOAC with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for VTE treatment in cancer patients till April 2020. The efficacy outcomes were recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality rates, and the primary safety outcome was incidence of major bleeding rate. Results: Four randomized controlled studies comparing NOAC with LMWH (1446 patients in NOAC group and 1448 patients in LMWH group) were included in our study. Use of NOAC lead to significant reduction in recurrent VTE rate (odds ratio (OR): 0.55 [0.36-0.84], I 2 = 45 %, p value = 0.006) (Figure 1). However, we did not find any significant difference in rate of major bleeding (OR: 1.30 [0.76-2.23], I 2 = 35%, p value = 0.34) (Figure 2) and all-cause mortality (OR: 1 [0.80 - 1.26], I 2 = 33%, p value = 0.98). Conclusions: This updated meta-analysis showed comparatively lower pooled recurrent VTE rate in patient being treated with NOAC, whereas similar rates of major bleeding and all-cause death. NOAC are more efficacious and has similar safety profile compared with LMWH.

Evaluation of the Use of Low-Dose 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in the Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Bleeding Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 903-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa A. Allison ◽  
Pei Jen Lin ◽  
Jennifer A. Gass ◽  
Kenneth Chong ◽  
Samuel J. Prater ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Prothrombin Complex Concentrate ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Factor Xa Inhibitor ◽  
Direct Factor

Objective: This study investigated the percentage of patients who achieved hemostasis with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4-factor PCC) 35 U/kg. The primary end point was to determine the effect of 4-factor PCC 35 U/kg on bleeding progression, assessed using computed tomography. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study conducted in patients with a major bleed admitted to a level 1 trauma center from May 1, 2013, to June 15, 2015, who received 4-factor PCC 35 U/kg for reversal of a direct factor Xa inhibitor taken prior to admission. Results: Thirty-three patients were included in the study, with 31 patients in the final analysis. The mean (standard deviation) age was 73 (14.8) years; 54.5% of patients were female. Of the 33 patients, 13 presented with a traumatic brain injury, 9 with an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, 8 with an intracerebral hemorrhage, 1 with a gastrointestinal bleed, 1 with a hematoma with active extravasation, and 1 with an intra-abdominal bleed. The most frequently used direct factor Xa inhibitor was rivaroxaban (81.8%). Overall, 83.8% of patients achieved hemostasis with 4-factor PCC 35 U/kg. Progression of hemorrhage was observed in 4 patients on repeat computed tomography scan and 1 patient had continued surgical bleeding. No thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusions: Low-dose, 4-factor PCC 35 U/kg appeared to produce hemostasis in a majority of the patients. This may be an effective dosing regimen for anticoagulant reversal of factor Xa inhibitors in clinically bleeding patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document