Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Anti-Xa Guided Reversal of Apixaban With Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in a Patient on Hemodialysis

The growing use of oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly the recent increased use of apixaban in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), has created a new dilemma in the already controversial topic of oral FXa inhibitor reversal. With the limited availability of anti-Xa levels specific to oral FXa inhibitors and even scarcer availability of reversal data for patients on these agents with ESRD, ensuring adequate reversal is currently often solely guided by repeat imaging and changes in clinical status. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) anti-Xa levels have been used as a more commonly accessible test to guide the need for and efficacy of reversal of oral FXa inhibitors in patients with normal renal function. However, evidence supporting this technique is again lacking in patients with renal dysfunction. This case report focuses on the use of LMWH anti-Xa levels to guide reversal of apixaban in a patient with ESRD on hemodialysis and correlation of those levels to the patient’s clinical status.

A Diagnostic Solution for Lupus Anticoagulant Testing in Patients Taking Direct Oral FXa Inhibitors Using DOAC Filter

Background: Direct oral factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors interfere with lupus anticoagulant (LA) assays challenging antiphospholipid syndrome diagnosis in treated patients. We evaluated a new device, called DOAC Filter, and its usefulness in this setting. It is a single-use filtration cartridge in which FXa inhibitor compounds are trapped by non-covalent binding while plasma is filtered through a solid phase. Patient samples were analyzed before and after filtration: 38 rivaroxaban, 41 apixaban, and 68 none. Anticoagulant plasma concentrations were measured using specific anti-Xa assays and HPLC-MS/MS. LA testing was performed using dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) and Silica Clotting Time (SCT). Baseline median [min–max] concentrations were 64.8 [17.6; 311.4] for rivaroxaban and 92.1 ng/mL [37.1; 390.7] for apixaban (HPLC-MS/MS). They were significantly correlated with anti-Xa assay results (r = 0.98 and r = 0.94, respectively). dRVVT was positive in 92% rivaroxaban and 72% apixaban and SCT in 28 and 41% of samples, respectively. Post-filtration, median % of neutralization was 100% with rivaroxaban and apixaban concentrations of, respectively, <2 [<2–2.4] and <2 ng/mL [<2–9.6] using HPLC-MS/MS. No significant effect of DOAC Filter was observed on LA testing in controls (n = 31) and LA-positive (n = 37) non-anticoagulated samples. dRVVT and SCT remained positive in, respectively, 16 and 8% of rivaroxaban and 41 and 18% of apixaban samples. DOAC Filter would be an easy-to-use device allowing FXa inhibitor removal from plasma samples, limiting their interference with LA testing in treated patients.

Hemostatic Efficacy and Anti-FXa (Factor Xa) Reversal With Andexanet Alfa in Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose: Andexanet alfa is a recombinant modified human FXa (factor Xa) developed to reverse FXa inhibition from anticoagulants. Hemostatic efficacy and reversal of anti-FXa activity with andexanet were assessed in patients from the ANNEXA-4 study (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of FXa Inhibitors) with intracranial hemorrhage (ICrH). Methods: ANNEXA-4 was a single-arm study evaluating andexanet in patients presenting with major bleeding ≤18 hours after taking an FXa inhibitor. Patients received a bolus plus 2-hour infusion of andexanet. Brain imaging in patients with ICrH was performed at baseline and at 1 and 12 hours postandexanet infusion. Coprimary efficacy outcomes were change in anti-FXa activity and hemostatic efficacy at 12 hours (excellent/good efficacy defined as ≤35% increase in hemorrhage volume/thickness). Safety outcomes included occurrence of thrombotic events and death at 30 days. Results: A total of 227 patients with ICrH were included in the safety population (51.5% male; mean age 79.3 years) and 171 in the efficacy population (99 spontaneous and 72 traumatic bleeds). In efficacy evaluable patients, excellent/good hemostasis 12 hours postandexanet occurred in 77 out of 98 (78.6%) and in 58 out of 70 (82.9%) patients with spontaneous and traumatic bleeding, respectively. In the subanalysis by FXa inhibitor treatment group in the efficacy population, median of percent change in anti-FXa from baseline to nadir showed a decrease of 93.8% for apixaban-treated patients (n=99) and by 92.6% for rivaroxaban-treated patients (n=59). Within 30 days, death occurred in 34 out of 227 (15.0%) patients and thrombotic events occurred in 21 out of 227 (9.3%) patients (safety population). Conclusions: Andexanet reduced anti-FXa activity in FXa inhibitor-treated patients with ICrH, with a high rate of hemostatic efficacy. Andexanet may substantially benefit patients with ICrH, the most serious complication of anticoagulation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02329327.

Factor VIII Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA) Reversal for Apixaban and Rivaroxaban in Patients With Acute Intracranial and Nonintracranial Hemorrhage

Background: The clinical use of factor VIII inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) for factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor reversal is derived from small studies with notable variation in patient eligibility for use, dosage regimens, concurrent supportive care, and outcome measures. Consequently, additional effectiveness and safety data are warranted to expand the literature evaluating FEIBA for FXa inhibitor reversal. Objective: This study sought to determine the incidence of observed effective hemostasis within 24 hours of post-FEIBA® administration as well as in-hospital and 30-day post-discharge incidences of thromboembolic event (TEE) and mortality between apixaban and rivaroxaban in the intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and non-ICH populations. Methods: This case series evaluated patients between January 1, 2014 through July 1, 2019 who received at least one FEIBA® dose for apixaban or rivaroxaban reversal secondary to acute ICH or non-ICH. Patient demographics, FEIBA® dosages, adjunct treatments, effectiveness, and safety outcomes were retrospectively collected from electronic medical record review. Modified hemostasis outcomes, adapted from criteria previously published by Sarode et al., TEE, and mortality between apixaban and rivaroxaban in the ICH and non-ICH populations were evaluated. Results: Among the 104 patients evaluated, 62 received apixaban and 42 rivaroxaban. Thirty apixaban and 25 rivaroxaban users experienced ICH, whereas 32 apixaban and 17 rivaroxaban users experienced non-ICH. Among the combined ICH and non-ICH populations, effective hemostasis occurred in 89%, TEE in 8%, and mortality in 13%. No statistically significant differences were observed within ICH and non-ICH populations receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban regarding effective hemostasis, TEE, or mortality. Conclusion and Relevance: The combined ICH and non-ICH overall rates of effective hemostasis, TEE, and mortality were comparable to preexisting studies of FEIBA for factor Xa inhibitor reversal. The limitations inherent to the study design warrant a randomized controlled trial with an active comparator to confirm these observations.

Retrospective Comparison of Andexanet Alfa and 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex for Reversal of Factor Xa-Inhibitor Related Bleeding

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare andexanet alfa and 4-factor prothrombin complex (4F-PCC) for reversal of factor Xa (FXa)-inhibitor bleeding. Patients that received andexanet alfa for reversal were included. An equivalent number of patients administered 4F-PCC for FXa-inhibitor bleeding were randomly selected as historical controls. The primary outcome was effective hemostasis achievement within 12 h, defined using ANNEXA-4 criteria. Thromboembolic events and mortality within 30 days were also evaluated. A total of 32 patients were included. Baseline characteristics were not statistically different between andexanet alfa (n = 16) and 4F-PCC (n = 16). Intracranial bleeding was the primary reversal indication in 43.8% versus 62.5% of patients, respectively. Effective hemostasis was reached in 75.0% of andexanet alfa patients compared to 62.5% of 4F-PCC patients ( P = .70). Thromboembolic events occurred in 4 (25.0%) patients and 3 (18.8%) patients, respectively ( P = .99). Mortality incidence was 12.5% and 31.3%, respectively ( P = .39). Andexanet alfa and 4F-PCC attained hemostasis in a majority of patients. A high, but a similar rate of thromboembolic events was seen with both treatments. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate comparative risks and benefits of the 2 agents.

Validation of a Modified Anti-FXa Assay on STA-Compact Analyzer for Measuring FXa Inhibitor Levels in the Presence of Andexanet Alfa

Introduction: The anticoagulants rivaroxaban and apixaban inhibit Factor Xa (FXa) activity and are effective therapeutic agents for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism. Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is the only specific reversal agent approved for anticoagulation reversal in patients presenting with life-threatening bleeding treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban. Anti-FXa assays are functional assays used for measuring direct and indirect FXa inhibitor levels in plasma. Current commercially available anti-FXa assays are not suitable for accurately measuring anti-FXa activity in patient samples in the presence of andexanet due to the high sample dilutions (e.g.,1:44 with STA-Liquid Anti-Xa), which causes dissociation of the inhibitor from andexanet (due to reversible binding). This results in substantial underestimation of the reversal activity of andexanet, and in some cases with erroneously elevated anti-FXa levels in patient samples following andexanet treatment. Therefore, we modified the current anti-FXa assays to measure apixaban and rivaroxaban anti-FXa levels in the presence of andexanet. Methods: The modified anti-FXa assays were performed on STA®-Compact analyzer using reagents from STA-Liquid Anti-Xa assay kits (Stago). Andexanet was provided as a 10 mg/mL frozen stock. Plasma samples with FXa inhibitor in the presence or absence of andexanet were prepared using Stago Calibrator 1 and pooled normal human plasma (Precision Biologic). Previous anti-FXa assays (calibrator range: 0-500 ng/mL) employed 1:4 dilution of test plasma in Owren-Koller buffer followed by addition of FXa substrate and bovine FXa with an overall 1:44 sample dilution. In the modified assays, calibration curves for the anti-FXa assay were generated using apixaban or rivaroxaban calibrators in the range of 0 to 80 ng/mL; test samples were analyzed neat with an overall 1:2.6 sample dilution. Rivaroxaban and apixaban concentrations in the test samples were interpolated from the respective assay specific calibration curves. Validation of the modified anti-FXa assays was performed by assessing a) linearity and precision of the calibration curve and controls, b) lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ), c) inter-assay precision and d) sample stability. Results: The calibration curves for both apixaban and rivaroxaban assays demonstrated good correlation with a mean "r" value of 0.997 and 0.998, respectively (n=6). The percent recovery and precision of the modified anti-FXa assay are summarized in Table 1. The LLOQ for apixaban and rivaroxaban using the modified assays were <18.8 and <20.6 ng/mL, respectively, based on the preliminary results. Both apixaban and rivaroxaban assays demonstrated potent reversal of anti-FXa activity in presence of andexanet. Samples containing 232 ng/mL apixaban (0.5 µM) treated with equimolar andexanet (0.5 µM) resulted in 77.18 ng/mL of quantifiable apixaban (~66.7% reversal). Similarly, samples containing 242 ng/mL rivaroxaban (0.5 µM) treated with equimolar andexanet (0.5 µM) resulted in 29.44 ng/mL quantifiable rivaroxaban (~87.8% reversal). The short-term stability study with the modified anti-FXa assay included storage of plasma samples at 2-8oC up to 24 hours and under frozen conditions at -20oC up to 2 weeks. Conclusions: The modified anti-FXa assays intended for measuring FXa inhibitor levels in the presence of andexanet produced acceptable analytical performance characteristics. Application of the modified anti-FXa assays in plasma samples from andexanet-treated human subjects has yet to be studied. Table 1 Disclosures Cardenas: CirQuest Labs/MLM Medical Labs: Current Employment. Kotha:CirQuest Labs/MLM Medical Labs: Current Employment. Lu:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Conley:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Bourdin:Diagnostica Stago: Current Employment. Herve:Diagnostica Stago: Current Employment. Jennings:CirQuest Labs/MLM Medical Labs: Current Employment, Current equity holder in private company.

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Concentrations in Obese and High Body Weight Patients: A Cohort Study

Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are prescribed for atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and both occur more frequently in obese patients. Outcomes from DOAC trials included few individuals ≥ 120 kg leading to uncertainty whether high body weight (BW) reduces DOAC concentrations. Objectives This article investigates the relationship between factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor concentrations, BW, and renal function, and compares them in high BW patients with unselected populations. Methods Consecutive patients in two United Kingdom centers, weighing ≥ 120 kg receiving 5 mg twice daily apixaban or 20 mg once daily rivaroxaban for AF or VTE were prospectively included. Peak or trough concentrations were measured using specific chromogenic assays, expressed in mean or median (5th–95th percentiles). On-therapy range was the interval from the 5th percentile trough concentration to the 95th percentile peak concentration. Results One hundred patients were included; age range: 23 to 78 years, 31% were women, 58% had AF, creatinine clearance range: 67 to 474 mL/min. Median BW was 139 kg, and 84% had body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2. DOAC peak and trough concentrations varied from 44 to 727 and 14 to 299 ng/mL, respectively. There was no linear relationship between FXa inhibitor concentrations at peak or trough and BW or BMI, and creatinine clearance. Apixaban troughs in AF and rivaroxaban peaks in VTE were lower than in unselected populations. However, only two trough concentrations were below the expected range, and 109/116 were within the on-therapy range. Conclusion These data indicated that obese or high BW patients generally achieve therapeutic FXa inhibitor concentrations. However, further investigations assessing clinical outcomes are required.

An engineered factor Va prevents bleeding induced by direct-acting oral anticoagulants by different mechanisms

Control of bleeding with direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains an unmet clinical need. Activated superFactor V (superFVa) is an engineered activated protein C (APC)–resistant FVa variant with enhanced procoagulant activity resulting from an A2/A3 domain disulfide bond and was studied here for control of DOAC-induced bleeding. SuperFVa reversed bleeding induced by FXa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban), and the FIIa inhibitor dabigatran in BalbC mice. The blocking anti-protein C and APC [(A)PC] antibody SPC-54 also reduced FXa inhibitor induced bleeding similar to superFVa, whereas dabigatran-induced bleeding was not affected. This indicated that sufficient APC was generated to contribute to bleeding in the presence of FXa inhibitors, but not in the presence of dabigatran, suggesting that mechanisms contributing to bleeding differed for FXa and FIIa inhibitors. Despite different mechanisms contributing to bleeding, superFVa effectively reduced bleeding for all DOACs, indicating the versatility of superFVa’s properties that contribute to its universal prohemostatic effects for DOAC associated bleeding. Supported by thrombin generation assays on endothelial cells in normal plasma spiked with DOACs and patient plasma anticoagulated with DOACs, 3 complementary mechanisms were identified by which superFVa achieved DOAC class-independent prohemostatic efficiency. These mechanisms are resistance to inactivation by APC, overcoming the FV activation threshold, and maximizing the efficiency of the prothrombinase complex when the available FXa is increased by FVIIa-based prohemostatics. In summary, it is this versatility of superFVa that delineates it from other prohemostatic agents as a promising class-independent rescue agent in bleeding situations associated with DOACs.